Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/10/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3576461897).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_102.jpg){kind=link}
![142 File:"Estrada" альбом Гриши Урганта.jpg](#File:"Estrada"_альбом_Гриши_Урганта.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Unknown place, meaningless name, description - out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 05:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Blagoveshchensky Bridge and Academy of Arts - see 1, 2. NBS (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep Big thanks! Description corrected, category added. --Art-top (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. (By the way, based on the type of architecture, it would be hard to image that the place would be non-notable, so asking for ID might be more helpful than opening a DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
some hompegae picture, unknown persons, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Self promotion. Low quality image and commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 12:46, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image (she is not a notable person), out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
some hompegae picture, unknown persons, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Self promotion. Low quality image and commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 12:46, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image (she is not a notable person), out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photos with byline "Archivo" are in most cases not created by 20minutos.es. This one for example is not, see http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/08/prestige-oil-disaster-investigation-spain (AP photo). Indeed its a photo by Douanes Francaises distributed through various news wires, including the Associated Press wire and Getty Images. Martin H. (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete Maybe we should state that 20minutos.es is not actually a reliable source. On the other hand, how did you find the Guardian picture? I had a look at the EXIF information (it wasn't available) but didn't do any other thing (something that I should have done) Was it a simple google images search or anything more sofisticated? --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 06:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Goolge Search by Image (http://www.google.com/insidesearch/features/images/searchbyimage.html in case you not tried it so far). --Martin H. (talk) 08:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- It already is: Commons:Problematic sources#20minutos.es. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Martin H.'s Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 13:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unknown person, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 03:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: and also used to vandalize (see the deleted user page). Trijnsteltalk 13:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
very likely copyvio Wer?Du?! (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Comics. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
very likely copyvio Wer?Du?! (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Comics. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional INeverCry 02:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyright © Anti-Malware.ru, 2005-2012. All Rights Reserved. Blond (talk) 14:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Web site screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
© 2012 Listal.com Blond (talk) 15:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: typical obvious copyvio, sourced from the net 99of9 (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Swedish painter, died 1945. Works in Sweden are copyrighted until 70 years after death of author. Suggest re-upload to English Wikipedia as it is in the public domain in the United States (published before 1923). Also suggest add to Category:Undelete in 2016. Dcoetzee (talk) 06:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright expires at the end of the year of life+70, so 2016. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The column is work of Anton Bitenc (1920-1977), which makes the image ineligible for Commons (see COM:FOP#Slovenia). I've uploaded a cropped version showing only the ancient Roman statue (File:Emonec replica.jpg). Eleassar (t/p) 08:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it meets the 'de minimis' criteria, because it was included on purpose in the image (it seems that it was a crop of a larger image) and can be cropped without a loss of information on the statue itself. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- But it loses the "breathing space" on the bottom. The point is that including area below the statue is not for the purpose of showing the column, but for the mere purpose of having space below. We could argue that the screens in File:Virgin America airplane interior.jpg be blanked, but such manipulation seems unnatural, not because of what was removed (in which case DM fails as the content of the copyrighted material matters), but where it was removed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean (I've realised already that the crop was too tight, I've uploaded a new version), in any case it's not necessary to include so much of the column. See for example the newly uploaded file or also this image, which has enough of the pedestal to give the "breathing space" and doesn't show more of the copyrighted work than really necessary. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- The new version looks good. Delete King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- The new version looks good.
- I don't think it meets the 'de minimis' criteria, because it was included on purpose in the image (it seems that it was a crop of a larger image) and can be cropped without a loss of information on the statue itself. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per consensus Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Later found and deleted:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Eleassar (t/p) 12:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work" as claimed -- we need details of when and where published, and photographer's name. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - unused now; re-uploaded into ru-wiki as "Fair Use", see ru:Файл:Василий Фёдорович Евстратов (1908-1992).jpg. --Kaganer (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per Kaganer's Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I uploaded an incorrect photo and would like to do this over from scratch. See Help_desk#Wrong_photo Dodger67 (talk) 08:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Problem solved by selectively deleting the mistaken upload from the history of the file. January (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
File does not have any licenses recognized by commons and found at Commons:Copyright tags. The license User:SanglierT/creditimage only mentions CC-BY-NC-SA, which is not allowed on Commons, unless it is accompanied by another license which is recognized. I am marking this file for deletion, so I (or someone else) can verify that the file ends up with valid license. Jarekt (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I did not check but other files using User:SanglierT/creditimage without additional licenses should be treated the same way. --Jarekt (talk) 19:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Jarekt#Licence discussion--Jarekt (talk) 00:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
After closer look it seems like:
- Original upload license was {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}
- It was latter replaced with {{User:SanglierT/creditimage}} stating the same license [1]
- {{User:SanglierT/creditimage}} was latter changed from {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to CC-BY-NC-SA [2]
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ANational_Coat_of_arms_of_Liechtenstein.svg&diff=67915584&oldid=67911619){kind=link}
As I explained at User_talk:Jarekt#Licence discussion with the uploader licenses can not be revoked. See FAQ. I will restore the original license of this and similar files. --Jarekt (talk) 02:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: File kept after restoration of the original license Jarekt (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - article on en.wiki that this links to was deleted as "blatant hoax" - article was w:Rohit Sarin INeverCry 00:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works of the stark wars character. sугсго 10:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion likeness to orginal master Yoda is very far... Electron ツ ➧☎ 21:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: COM:DW doesn't apply Morning ☼ (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Is this group notable, or is this out of scope? . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not a free web host Wiki13 15:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
website (photo). Blond (talk) 15:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement Wiki13 15:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement Wiki13 15:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement Wiki13 15:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement Wiki13 16:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement Wiki13 16:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Looks like advertisement (Commons:Advertisement). Blond (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 16:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
because I had just uploaded it by myself, but I have changed my mind. Dourios (talk) 18:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Louvre pyramide not free Havang(nl) (talk) 19:03, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
-2012-10-22T19:03:00.000Z-File:Louvre_Museum_-_Pyramid_at_Front.JPG){kind=link}
Support yes to delete. No FoP in France --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
image used only in spam userpage deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused personal image Wiki13 20:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Unused vanity picture GrapedApe (talk) 21:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
copyvio see picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
screenshot copyvio Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
copyvio screenshot Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
copyvio screenshot Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
screenshot copyvio Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, belongs to http://sergiokato.com/ Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
see previous picture. copyvio, belongs to http://sergiokato.com/ Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio see picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
copyright violation Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational use Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Inicio do Túnel do Rossio.jpg -- Tuválkin ✉ 00:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:CPA 4006 e 4003 do serviço Alfa Pendular em Santa Apolónia.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ 00:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Duplicate per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:CP MLW 1562 Parque do Poceirão com 1905 a reboque.jpg -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Duplicate per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:SET UTE + UQE de Cascais.jpg -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 01:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3576461897).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3576461897).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Duas automotoras da linha de Cascais no Cais do Sodré.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
_(3576461897).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:02, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
_(3576461897).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Duas automotoras na Carroças Quebradas com chuva.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:02, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:MTS C018 a sair de Corroios com destino ao Pragal em 07072009.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 01:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Gov't logo uploaded without evidence of PD status or free license GrapedApe (talk) 03:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 掬茶 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: 投稿者本人による削除依頼 Sreejith K (talk) 04:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- 日本語ですみません。秋田中央警察署に関しては、他のユーザーから好天時のより見やすい画像が提供されたこと(撮影地点もほぼ同一で画像の内容にはほとんど違いがありません)から、このファイルの削除を求めた次第です。--掬茶 (talk) 05:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment I'm sorry, but can someone please provide a translation of both statements? Unfortunately Google Translate is chronically bad at Asian languages, especially Japanese. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)- The object which is shown by this file (Akita-Chuo Police Station) is also shown by the another file. This file is inferior in quality to the other. So please delete this file.--掬茶 (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Being superseded by another image doesn't necessarily mean deletion. Not that bad in quality, still educationally useful. Yasu (talk) 15:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Per Yasu Sven Manguard Wha? 02:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
superseded by the File:Akita Chuo Police Office.JPG 掬茶 (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: As per the previous discussion, "being superseded" is not a valid reason for deletion. --DAJF (talk) 00:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 01:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Logo of not significant organization. Art-top (talk) 05:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
On which grounds the logotype of a sport organization is not copyrighted? Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 06:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
_102.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_102.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photographed by Clarence Bull? I don't know, but prior publication is unknown, as the blog posted this photo on website. I bet this is one of unpublished photos. George Ho (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
_102.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
_102.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:PS: Unused personal image, unidentified individual, no educational value, Commons is not a private photo hoster. Gunnex (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Maybe no-FoP in Brazil ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep there is FOP in Brazil, see here:
- Article 48 of Law nº 9.610 of February 19, 1998 states:
- Works permanently located in public places may be freely represented by painting, drawing, photography and audiovisual processes. --Cayambe (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, please check COM:FOP before nominating next time. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: FoP is available in Brazil Morning ☼ (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
unused computer-caracature of the user's self. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 08:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Maps of Middle-earth are copvios, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Maps of Middle-earth NNW (talk) 09:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
definitely not an own work but a scan of a touristical road map: some symbols are blurred, also the upper and lower right edge, in the upper half there can be seen where this map was folded, names are cut, the fonts in the legend are completely different from the map's fonts etc. NNW (talk) 09:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
definitely not an own work but a scan of a touristical road map: some symbols are blurred, also the upper and lower right edge, in the upper half there can be seen where this map was folded, names are cut, the fonts in the legend are completely different from the map's fonts etc. See also File:SInis modificata2 icone indicazioni monte prama.jpg NNW (talk) 09:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not in agreement with this view of things.
- First: the maps are all based on other maps: how else do you meet the accuracy of coast line, the placement of rivers, all geographical features of places?
- second point: I have changed completely, the area corresponding to the Sinis and Oristano city; I have not changed:the network of roads around the city of oristano, for reasons of time,and Ferru Mountain area, in order to respect the places
- third point: the icons used in the legend were made all by myself, except for the icon "simple Nuraghi", because, in any map, they are depicted with that shape: conical trunk shape typical of the Nuraghi.
- fourth point: "the fonts in the legend are completely different from the map's fonts"; really sorry but that comment is completely wrong. What are the icons in the legend, totally different than those of the map?
- Statues?
- nuraghi?
- villages?
- ancient cities?
- Giants ' grave?
- The original map, on which I based my, modified with Gimp, was printed in 1979. If this constitutes copyright infringement, I pick up the map. Or, you can wait till I finish work and totally change. the old map is too general. This is much more precise.--DedaloNur (talk) 12:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- No one expects anybody here to create a completely new map via triangulation. But as you said you used a map published in 1979 and this map is definitely copyrighted. It doesn't matter if the icons were made by you or if you updated parts of that map: you weren't allowed to upload this map with a free license because of the copyright of the original map. You could take OpenStreetMap for your map and there wouldn't be a problem, it has a free license. NNW (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- the non-artistic picture in Italy, are protected by the copyrith for 30 years. However, because I have no time nor desire, to make controversy, and, because, I have uploaded the imagine on wikicommon, I already deleted the map, replacing it with one based on open map,that I hope will improve, hi.--DedaloNur (talk) 23:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- No one expects anybody here to create a completely new map via triangulation. But as you said you used a map published in 1979 and this map is definitely copyrighted. It doesn't matter if the icons were made by you or if you updated parts of that map: you weren't allowed to upload this map with a free license because of the copyright of the original map. You could take OpenStreetMap for your map and there wouldn't be a problem, it has a free license. NNW (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work. The image of the Wilkinson Sword logo is too prominent to claim 'de minimis' (Copyrighted work X is the central part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work useless.) Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 09:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 10:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 10:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 10:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, I guess. Rapsar (talk) 10:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete Seems in scope to me, for illustration of cultural background say. Problem I have is the upload description, which suggests the image fails Commons:BLP#Country-specific_consent_requirements. Being taken in either Czech Republic or Germany consent for publication is required, and it's highly unlikely, given the circumstances, that this was obtained. Rd232 (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Logo of non-significant organization. Art-top (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии. Логотипы, как правило, охраняются авторским правом. Dogad75 (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
copyvio, its from a graphicnovel called borgia Wer?Du?! (talk) 13:03, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Work which is recent (XXth c.) No FoP in France Remi Mathis (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Cannot be released under CC by an anonymous editor. I am not sure whether this is eligible for a PD-type license, as the CUP logo is prominently displayed in the upper left corner. Guillaume2303 (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Looks like advertisement (Commons:Advertisement). Blond (talk) 14:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
per COM:DW Morning ☼ (talk) 15:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Derivative photo of modern architecture of 1990s/2000s. The German Freedom of Panorama only applies for photos taken from a street, or a public slot, but not from a building. A.Savin 15:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Derivative photo of modern architecture of 1990s/2000s. The German Freedom of Panorama only applies for photos taken from a street, or a public slot, but not from a building. A.Savin 15:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Derivative photo of modern architecture of 1990s/2000s. The German Freedom of Panorama only applies for photos taken from a street, or a public slot, but not from a building. A.Savin 15:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The source page doesn't indicate that the image is available as {{Copyrighted free use}} Yasu (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Since this image was taken in the USSR in 1950, it is certainly under copyright until at least 2020. We will need permission from the photographer to keep it. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Photo of a screen showing a copyrighted film- FunkMonk (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Blurry, low resolution and probably out of scope. Blond (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The information in the image description is contradictory. The source is "own work", but the author is "inconnu" (unknown). Absent confirmation from the uploader that (s)he is the author of this photo, or otherwise owns the rights to it, it should be deleted. Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The information in the image description is contradictory. The source is "own work", but the author is "inconnu" (unknown). Absent confirmation from the uploader that (s)he is the author of this photo, or otherwise owns the rights to it, it should be deleted. I asked this question of the uploader on his/her talk page over a month ago, and have received no response. Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The works in this image trespass the threshold of individuality, which makes it a copyright violation. Eleassar (t/p) 18:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
See OTRS 2012101910002699 - in a nutshell - uploaded by someone who was not the copyright holder (just an employee), the copyright holder will only allow "no derrivitives" Ronhjones (Talk) 18:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
architecture 1966, not free yet Havang(nl) (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
-2012-10-22T19:05:00.000Z-File:Lormont_Eglise_St_Esprit.JPG){kind=link}
- OK, I thought that a church was free from a copyright restriction
- Alas, no and there is no Freedom of Panorama in France :-( Remi Mathis (talk) 18:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Built in 1948-1955. No freedom of panorama in Russia. Art-top (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 19:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 19:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 19:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
See OTRS 2012102110008796 - states it is not Bernard Summer. Flickr does not imply that, it says "snowdon" - pop group, looks like face matches en:File:Snowden.jpg, no mention of Bernhard Summer being in Snowdon en:Snowden (band), so e-mail looks true. Since we don't know who he is, no point in keeping image Ronhjones (Talk) 19:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio of a work by Hector Guimard (dead in 1942 => PD in 2013) No FoP in France Remi Mathis (talk) 20:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Info Files restored, because the subject is now PD. --Coyau (talk) 02:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
This picture can't be considered as free. The building was created by architect Charles-Henri Besnard (1881-1946), who died less than 70 years ago. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
No indication as to why/under which laws/etc. this work is "official item legally exempt from copyright", nor does the image appear to be so simple as to fall below the threshold of originality. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be too complex to be copyrightable, so the {{PD-textlogo}} claim looks wrong. The uploader forgot to specify under which law(s) this would be exempt from copyright, so the licence can't be verified. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Claim of "own work" is not credible; no other claim of PD or free license GrapedApe (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Professional style photo with (C) Bacharach copyright notice; no evidence of any release or evidence that uploader is the ever-elusive "Bacharach" GrapedApe (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The picture is of the artist creating an artwork - derivative work, or de minimis? I'd say since the image is ABOUT the artwork, it is dubious at best. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Unknown sculptor, created after 1945, therefore ineligible for Commons (see COM:FOP#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 08:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Work of Jernej Mali, put on display in 2004. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, ineligible for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 09:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Philippines. 84.61.150.64 09:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Work of a living sculptor, Boštjan Drinovec. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, ineligible for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Underlying work is still copyrighted. In the US, FOP does not extend to two dimensional works of art. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
This file (gadera spelled ga) superceded by ILjunction-gedera.png (gedera spelled ge) @Efrat (talk) 07:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The equestrian statue was work of Lojze Dolinar, who died in 1970. Ineligible for Commons per COM:FOP#Slovenia. In addition, there's no reliable source cited that would claim that the author of the photograph was unknown, therefore also delete per lack of evidence. Eleassar (t/p) 08:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Duplicated with File:An exemple of Fangorn Tree.jpg, same resolution, but with a copyright watermark. Rondador (talk) 10:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement Wiki13 16:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This photo illustrates a product and is used in the article sv:Milda. Please be more specific what section of Commons:Project scope that it does not conform to. /ℇsquilo 16:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Per DR. MBisanz talk 19:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
We have a better version of this file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
We have a better version of this file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 19:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of File:Flag of the Patriote movement (Lower Canada).svg Iketsi (talk) 21:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
The uploader claims this is his own work, but the description says it is owned by the family of the subject. We need evidence of permission from the family. Psychonaut (talk) 07:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- This is a family picture, given free for public domain.--Kaktus Kid (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great! Please submit a letter from the family confirming that they were the copyright holder and have released the work into the public domain. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:59, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Requires formal permission from the photographer using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Photograph of a document from the archives of Enerson Xuxu Harger, for which we have no evidence of permission, nor a correct date which might put the work in the public domain. Psychonaut (talk) 07:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- This is a copy from a document of the prefecture of Braço do Norte. It belongs to the community and is in public domain.--Kaktus Kid (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This could be {{PD-BrazilGov}} if it was published before 1983. Unless the publication date can be established, it must be deleted. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jim King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Photo from the Collaço family archives, for which we have no evidence of permission. The uploader's claim of authorship is dubious, and the photo is misdated. Judging from the clothing worn by the subjects, the photo may not yet be in the public domain. Psychonaut (talk) 07:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I am sure to have published this picture correctly, with permission of family Collaço from Braço do Norte! Kaktus Kid (talk) 14:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great. Could you please submit a copy of their letter of permission indicating that they've released the photo under a Commons-compatible licence? —Psychonaut (talk) 09:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Requires formal permission from the photographer using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Italy for buildings. This should never have been kept in the first DR. russavia (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- The first deletion nomination was here: Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:AlitaliaHQFiumicinoItaly.JPG - The rationale for keeping at the time from the individual who argued keeping the image was "not much architecture to see" - Here is a closeup of the building (Piazza Almerico da Schio) in my image. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Rather nondescript building, I really don't see how this is copyrightable (COM:TOO). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Except in France, we have no evidence that all architecture is not copyrightable. This building would certainly have a copyright in the USA. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
No evidence that the creator of the monument (Mr. Ivan Irt from Štepanja Vas) died before 1945. He is mentioned in newspapers as late as October 1943. If there is some tombstone mentioning him at the cemetery in Štepanja Vas, a photo of it could be provided to establish the exact year of his death. Mr. Irt also created other monuments in Slovenia, so it would be great if we can clarify this. Eleassar (t/p) 14:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- There is an Ivan Irt buried in the Štepanja Vas Cemetery, along the eastern wall, line CD, Grave 14, if somebody would like to check that. Also a Janez Irt at the same location. And another Janez Irt at Ljubljana-Polje (Dept. 4, Line 3, Grave 9), and an Ivan Irt at Ljubljana-Polje (Dept. 1, Line 7, Grave 7). Doremo (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- It may also be possible to obtain information here: Kamnoseštvo Irt Jožefa, Kamnoseška Ulica 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel. 01-544-50-29. Doremo (talk) 14:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- It would also be good to determine whether the stonecutter Ivan Irt mentioned in October 1943 here (page 2, column 1, paragraph 5) is the same one that created the 1926 monument. Stonecutting is apparently a family business still continued by the Irt family today, and Janez/Ivan is a rather common first name. Doremo (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I'll see if I can find out anything useful. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ron Blakey explicitly states on his website (http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html) that his maps of prehistoric Earth are NOT freely available for commercial use. He expressed his disapproval to me by email, but you can deduce as much by this quote from his page: "All maps are copyright to me, Ron Blakey, and may bu used, with citation to Ron Blakey, NAU Geology, for educational, non-profit, non-commercial purposes. For commercial uses, please contact me." The CCA license permits free commercial use provided the user credits the original author, which is NOT what Blakey says on his website. This image should instead by uploaded to Wikipedia, where his conditions are accepted.|source=http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html INeverCry 17:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- What about the OTRS ticket? See also this edit. NNW (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Info This image was previously nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files by 36ophiuchi and kept. KTC (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Info Please see my comment here regarding OTRS permission in response to question raised from the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pretesm on related images. KTC (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I think the OTRS e-mail is bogus -- probably written by the uploader (who has subsequently been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Prof Blakely has an e-mail address at nau.edu, which is what you would expect for a university professor. The OTRS message came from a German ISP. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: It appears that the identity of the OTRS client cannot be confirmed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ron Blakey explicitly states on his website (http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html) that his maps of prehistoric Earth are NOT freely available for commercial use. He expressed his disapproval to me by email, but you can deduce as much by this quote from his page: "All maps are copyright to me, Ron Blakey, and may bu used, with citation to Ron Blakey, NAU Geology, for educational, non-profit, non-commercial purposes. For commercial uses, please contact me." The CCA license permits free commercial use provided the user credits the original author, which is NOT what Blakey says on his website. This image should instead by uploaded to Wikipedia, where his conditions are accepted.|source=http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html INeverCry 17:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ron Blakely could be asked if the ten files by Blakely that were uploaded by User:Pretesm can be part of the OTRS ticket 1511126, too. NNW (talk) 15:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I think the OTRS e-mail is bogus -- probably written by the uploader (who has subsequently been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Prof Blakely has an e-mail address at nau.edu, which is what you would expect for a university professor. The OTRS message came from a German ISP. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: It appears that the identity of the OTRS client cannot be confirmed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ron Blakey explicitly states on his website (http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html) that his maps of prehistoric Earth are NOT freely available for commercial use. He expressed his disapproval to me by email, but you can deduce as much by this quote from his page: "All maps are copyright to me, Ron Blakey, and may bu used, with citation to Ron Blakey, NAU Geology, for educational, non-profit, non-commercial purposes. For commercial uses, please contact me." The CCA license permits free commercial use provided the user credits the original author, which is NOT what Blakey says on his website. This image should instead by uploaded to Wikipedia, where his conditions are accepted.|source=http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html INeverCry 17:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- What about the OTRS ticket? NNW (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Blakey states that his image may be freely used ONLY for non-commercial purposes. If you want to use it commercially, you need to get his permission. The CCA license it has on the Wiki Commons allows for free commercial use. He's pretty pissed because people have been selling his work as their own because of this mislabelling.Kurzon (talk) 06:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Here we can read something different: I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs. So it is Blakey's turn to declare if User:36ophiuchi posted a fake mail (but then there is still the OTRS ticket) or if he just changed his mind about it. NNW (talk) 07:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think what Blakey writes on his own website overrules something written on a wiki. You should follow this 36opiuchi guy to his Wikipedia homepage. Apparently he's GERMAN. If this guy did contact Blakey himself, he probably neglected to inform Blakey that Wiki Commons' CCA license permits commercial use.Kurzon (talk) 16:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- I see no connection between this DR and 36opiuchi's citizenship. Are you sure you understood how OTRS works? There must be a mail by Blakey himself, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files by 36ophiuchi. NNW (talk) 16:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think what Blakey writes on his own website overrules something written on a wiki. You should follow this 36opiuchi guy to his Wikipedia homepage. Apparently he's GERMAN. If this guy did contact Blakey himself, he probably neglected to inform Blakey that Wiki Commons' CCA license permits commercial use.Kurzon (talk) 16:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Btw he also wrote I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. So if anyone claims this as his own it is Blakey's right to react. And he definitely should do so. NNW (talk) 07:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Here we can read something different: I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs. So it is Blakey's turn to declare if User:36ophiuchi posted a fake mail (but then there is still the OTRS ticket) or if he just changed his mind about it. NNW (talk) 07:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Blakey states that his image may be freely used ONLY for non-commercial purposes. If you want to use it commercially, you need to get his permission. The CCA license it has on the Wiki Commons allows for free commercial use. He's pretty pissed because people have been selling his work as their own because of this mislabelling.Kurzon (talk) 06:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
From what I read here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ALateJurassicGlobal.jpg&diff=11356922&oldid=11225730 , 36opiuchi wrote to Blakey asking if he could use the maps on WIKIPEDIA, and Blakey replied "Yes, you may use the maps. Please credit me." 36opiuchi did not make it clear to Blakey that he planned to upload the files to Wiki Commons under the CCA license, which permits free commercial use. Because of this, people have been selling his maps as their own without paying him, and he's quite pissed. We don't have to remove these files, just transfer them to Wikipedia, where we can label it as "free for non-commercial, educational use only." I don't understand why this is a problem.Kurzon (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- You still don't understand. Please read this edit again. And this was confirmed via OTRS. If he is "pissed" then he should have thought about it a little bit earlier. NNW (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Here is the email that was sent to Mr Blakey:
- "As I intend to expand and further illustrate Wikipedia's articles on the different time-periods I wondered, if you would be opposed to your global paleographic maps being implemented in these articles. To be more precise: I think it would be most illustrating to use one global map per time-period-article.
- I hereby ask you for your kind permission to use your maps under http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/mollglobe.html on Wikipedia."
- Here is his reply:
- "Yes, you may use the maps. Please credit me.
- Cheers,
- Ron Blakey"
- Notice the email does not make it clear that it would be uploaded under a free license. Mr Blakey assumed it would be educational only, because he heard that Wikipedia is a free, educational encyclopedia. In any case, it doesn't matter who goofed, he wants the pictures removed, because people are exploiting his work for profit without compensating him. It seems absurd that Blakey would knowingly agree to a CCA license, because that would invalidate the copyright blurb on his own page. He cannot grant special exclusive permission on Wiki Commons. People have been exploiting these maps because they took Wiki Commons' word at face value.Kurzon (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- You are wrong again. Mr Blakey as the source of these maps can grant any licence to anybody he wants to. There is no objection. I'll contact the OTRS team to ask what is in ticket #1511126. And please answer the question below. NNW (talk) 10:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- So everything is said now: [3]. The ticket is okay, the license is okay. NNW (talk) 12:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Christ, you really don't want to look into this too deeply, do you? Why don't you contact Mr Blakey by email yourself: rblakey@cpgeosystems.com ? Go ahead, he talked to me, so he'll probably talk to you.Kurzon (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Dear next admin, please close this DR. This is running in circles while Kurzon still doesn't want to answer the question about the files he uploaded for weeks ago. NNW (talk) 10:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Btw: What about File:ContinentalDrift600MY.gif? For this GIF you used File:LateJurassicGlobal.jpg, too. You produced six animations and don't even mention them. Did you use any other data than the files which were uploaded in April 2008 by 36opiuchi? NNW (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I think the OTRS e-mail is bogus -- probably written by the uploader (who has subsequently been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Prof Blakely has an e-mail address at nau.edu, which is what you would expect for a university professor. The OTRS message came from a German ISP. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: It appears that the identity of the OTRS client cannot be confirmed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Restoredfollowing the discussion of Commons:Deletion requests/Files by 36ophiuchi and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pretesm : the file was uploaded in 2008 and is covered by the OTRS ticket (April 2008) ; if the validity of the ticket must be contested this is another matter - not a deletion request. I am in mail contact with Pr. Blacely, he does not contest the OTRS ticket (at least untill now). Michelet-密是力 (talk) 10:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- No one, not even Admins, can simply restore a file out of process. Please use an UnDR on this, which I will oppose for the reason given above -- the OTRS looks bogus. If you have private communication with Blakely, it must be put through the OTRS system. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ron Blakey explicitly states on his website (http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html) that his maps of prehistoric Earth are NOT freely available for commercial use. He expressed his disapproval to me by email, but you can deduce as much by this quote from his page: "All maps are copyright to me, Ron Blakey, and may bu used, with citation to Ron Blakey, NAU Geology, for educational, non-profit, non-commercial purposes. For commercial uses, please contact me." The CCA license permits free commercial use provided the user credits the original author, which is NOT what Blakey says on his website. This image should instead by uploaded to Wikipedia, where his conditions are accepted.|source=http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html INeverCry 17:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- What about the OTRS ticket? NNW (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Info This image was previously nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files by 36ophiuchi and kept. KTC (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Info Please see my comment here regarding OTRS permission in response to question raised from the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pretesm on related images. KTC (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I think the OTRS e-mail is bogus -- probably written by the uploader (who has subsequently been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Prof Blakely has an e-mail address at nau.edu, which is what you would expect for a university professor. The OTRS message came from a German ISP. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: It appears that the identity of the OTRS client cannot be confirmed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kurzon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Ron Blakey explicitly states on his website (http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html) that his maps of prehistoric Earth are NOT freely available for commercial use. He expressed his disapproval to me by email, but you can deduce as much by this quote from his page: "All maps are copyright to me, Ron Blakey, and may bu used, with citation to Ron Blakey, NAU Geology, for educational, non-profit, non-commercial purposes. For commercial uses, please contact me." The CCA license permits free commercial use provided the user credits the original author, which is NOT what Blakey says on his website. This image should instead by uploaded to Wikipedia, where his conditions are accepted.|source=http://cpgeosystems.com/globaltext2.html INeverCry 17:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- What about the OTRS ticket? NNW (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Info This image was previously nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files by 36ophiuchi and kept. KTC (talk) 12:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Info Please see my comment here regarding OTRS permission in response to question raised from the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pretesm on related images. KTC (talk) 12:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I think the OTRS e-mail is bogus -- probably written by the uploader (who has subsequently been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Prof Blakely has an e-mail address at nau.edu, which is what you would expect for a university professor. The OTRS message came from a German ISP. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: It appears that the identity of the OTRS client cannot be confirmed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
неправильно оформлено — Preceding unsigned comment added by NataliAndreevna (talk • contribs)
- Delete. Cover without original author permission. --Art-top (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
![06:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/10/22#c-Art-top-2012-11-01T06:07:00.000Z-File:"Estrada"_альбом_Гриши_Урганта.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:24, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
![22:24, 4 November 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/10/22#c-Jameslwoodward-2012-11-04T22:24:00.000Z-File:"Estrada"_альбом_Гриши_Урганта.jpg){kind=link}
This files looks an attack aimed at a company and I doubt whether we can have this. If I am mistaken, please let me know? Thanks. DVdm (talk) 20:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Note - The image was used to accompany this edit. - DVdm (talk) 20:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
---Next edit:
I'm not fluent in formatting wiki-edits, but the image I uploaded is evidence relating to an ongoing copyrights-issue with the company 'Spinnin records'. It's not an attack on the company, but truthful information to illustrate the ongoing controversy. The company info is still present on the page where this picture is shown. I understand this picture is not making the company look good, but that's not the point of true and unbiased information. The company has brought the problem to themselves by behaving badly in the copyright-dispute. That's fair info to report on a wiki page in my opinion. I do NOT believe this picture is in violation with any rules of correct behavior. The picture simply shows the current copyright dispute-status this company is involved in, which is true and fair information to share publically. Thank you. JEL JELSTUDIO
Deleted: Aside from the attack, the image appears to infring on the copyright of the photograph included on it. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Thelma Coyne Long
[edit]One image is a post-1945 Australian photo. As such, it is copyrighted in the United States for 95 years since publication, or if unpublished, for 120 years since creation. The other one is a modified version of the photo with a dubious {{Self}} claim. There is no evidence that the uploader took the photo more than 60 years ago.
Stefan4 (talk) 02:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Futboldeprimerauruguay (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyvios - images of footballers taken from internet
- File:Liverpool vs Independiente Copa Sudamericana 2012.jpg
- File:Semperena Seleccion Uruguaya Sub 20 año 2001.jpg
- File:Defensor vs Peñarol Semperena.JPG
- File:Central Español. Semeperena patron de dos areas.JPG
- File:Semperena en Defensor Sporting.jpg
- File:Central español vs Peñarol Carlos Bueno y Semperena miden sus fuerzas.JPG
- File:Central Español vs Nacional Semperena quita el balon entre 2 jugadores tricolores.JPG
- File:Central Español y Nacional Segio Blanco y Nelson Semperena.JPG
- File:Ganando en las alturas.jpg
- File:Semperena en la defensa del Zamora 2011.JPG
- File:Saltan De los Santos y Semperena por el balon.jpg
- File:Nelson Semperena en Zamora Fc.jpg
- File:Zamora 0 Fluminense 1.jpg
- File:Semperena vs Riquelme.jpg
- File:Semperena y Cvitanich en accion.jpg
- File:Fluminense 1 Zamora 0.jpg
- File:Zamora 0 Boca Juniors 0 Semperena post partido.jpg
- File:Liverpool 3 U de Sucre 0 Copa Sudamericana 2012.jpg
- File:Semprena seguridad en la defensa negriazul.jpg
- File:Semperena se barre en Liverpool 1 Envigado 0.jpg
- File:Semperena Cabecea con Taborda Lierpool vs Nacional.jpg
- File:Semperena se escapa al ataque vs Cerro Largo.jpg
- File:Semperena en Accion con Liverpool Fc vs Defensor Sporting.jpg
INeverCry 02:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.--Rapsar (talk) 11:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, {{Copyvio}}: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Internet images. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning ☼ (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Plaques in Vancouver
[edit]COM:FOP#Canada doesn't apply to literary works.
- File:1554 East 10th Avenue plaque.JPG
- File:Gabriola plaque.JPG
- File:Hotel Vancouver plaque.jpg
- File:IEEE milestone plaque TRIUMF.JPG
- File:Vancouver - Christ Church Cathedral plaques.jpg
- File:Vancouver - Gastown Steam Clock plaque.jpg
- File:Vancouver - Greenshields Building plaque.jpg
- File:Vancouver - Mole Hill 31.jpg
- File:Vancouver - Orpheum Theatre plaque.jpg
- File:Vancouver - Power Block plaque.jpg
- File:Vancouver - The Manhattan - plaque.jpg
- File:Vancouver Holden Building Tellier Tower Heritage Plaque .jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 02:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I would think that the "literary" content of these is minor enough to not qualify for copyright protection on that basis, but I would not be speaking from any particular knowledge of Canadian copyright law. Does anyone here have any idea if any similar question has ever arisen in a Canadian court, and what that court has ruled? - Jmabel ! talk 03:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Several sentences long sounds enough to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - I transferred some of these from en-wiki that I thought OK as they are definitely not a flat 2D image (which would not be allowed), but are 3D in nature - being cast by liquid metal, you cannot make a 2D image. Canada is like UK (where I am), anything that is 3D in design in a public place is FoP. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- 2D or 3D doesn't matter since it's text. FOP only applies to art, not to text. There are also a few similar images which are currently up for deletion at en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 22. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment If the text is the issue, can't the text be "clouded out" or possibly cropped off, and still keep the COV Heritage Building logo and the name of the building? --Moisejp (talk) 02:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- The problem is that you only can take photos of artistic works if they are works of artistic craftsmanship. While a metallic plaque probably counts as a work of artistic craftsmanship, the art drawn on the plaque does not. Thus, you would have to remove the logo too. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- The heading for this deletion proposal is "COM:FOP#Canada doesn't apply to literary works." Well, how about a link to what IS specified about literary works in Canada, and whether there is a definition there that encompasses this case. Also, the link actually does include (if you scroll up) "Sometimes, a literary work is a part of a sculpture or is presented on a publicly accessible plaque. It is usually understood that the particular presentation of the work falls under the panorama freedom." Where does it say that this is not true in Canada? --Moisejp (talk) 03:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- That is just a generic section which applies to some countries but not to all countries, without further specifying which countries it applies to. Some more specific text from the COM:FOP#Canada section: "The freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs." This is a sign, so FOP does not apply in Canada. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Some people above are arguing that it is 3D. I'd agree that it could be considered 3D. Also, you're changing your arguments. Above you wrote "2D or 3D doesn't matter since it's text." Now you're saying that 2D vs 3D is an issue. --Moisejp (talk) 14:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter so much whether it is 2D or 3D. It only matters if it is a work of artistic craftsmanship or not. A 2D work is usually not a work of artistic craftsmanship, and a 3D work is usually a work of artistic craftsmanship, but there are exceptions. Signs are specifically listed as not being works of artistic craftsmanship. A work of artistic craftsmanship has to have two features: it must be artistic, and it must be a work of craftsmanship. In what way is the text artistic? According to en:craftsmanship, a work of craftsmanship is an "item[] that may be functional or strictly decorative, including furniture, sculpture, clothing, jewellery, household items and tools or even machines such as the handmade devices of a watchmaker". In which way is the text an "item that may be functional or strictly decorative"? --Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Some people above are arguing that it is 3D. I'd agree that it could be considered 3D. Also, you're changing your arguments. Above you wrote "2D or 3D doesn't matter since it's text." Now you're saying that 2D vs 3D is an issue. --Moisejp (talk) 14:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- That is just a generic section which applies to some countries but not to all countries, without further specifying which countries it applies to. Some more specific text from the COM:FOP#Canada section: "The freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs." This is a sign, so FOP does not apply in Canada. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- The heading for this deletion proposal is "COM:FOP#Canada doesn't apply to literary works." Well, how about a link to what IS specified about literary works in Canada, and whether there is a definition there that encompasses this case. Also, the link actually does include (if you scroll up) "Sometimes, a literary work is a part of a sculpture or is presented on a publicly accessible plaque. It is usually understood that the particular presentation of the work falls under the panorama freedom." Where does it say that this is not true in Canada? --Moisejp (talk) 03:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- The problem is that you only can take photos of artistic works if they are works of artistic craftsmanship. While a metallic plaque probably counts as a work of artistic craftsmanship, the art drawn on the plaque does not. Thus, you would have to remove the logo too. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment If the text is the issue, can't the text be "clouded out" or possibly cropped off, and still keep the COV Heritage Building logo and the name of the building? --Moisejp (talk) 02:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- 2D or 3D doesn't matter since it's text. FOP only applies to art, not to text. There are also a few similar images which are currently up for deletion at en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 22. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't think any evidence has been presented so far that clearly and unequivocally shows that these plaques, particularly the Heritage in Vancouver plaques, which by some people's judgment can be considered 3D, fall under the Canadian standards of what must be deleted. --Moisejp (talk) 14:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- According to COM:FOP#Canada, "The freedom provided by the quoted section does not apply to typical two-dimensional works such as paintings, murals, advertising hoardings, maps, posters or signs." In which way is this not a sign? --Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete One of the exceptions is reproduction in a photograph of an architectural work. The plaques in question are clearly affixed to the building, but it is isn't reasonable that merely being affixed to a building removes what would otherwise be copyright protection, or every poster ever affixed to a wall would receive a copyright exemption; that argument doesn't prevail. The definition in the law of "architectural work" is "any building or structure" which doesn't conlcusively clarify whether an affixed plaque is covered. I'll suggest a test: any elements present in the architectural drawings are part of the architectural work, while items not specified in the drawing are outside the definition. While I do not have access to the actual relevant drawings, the thought experiment is adequate. We certainly don't expect the architectural drawings to include a poster of an upcoming concert. Getting to the point at hand, we don't believe the drawings would include a plaque from an external agency.
- There is another exception for sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship or a cast or model of a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, that is permanently situated in a public place or building;. Although the plaques are permanent, and certainly the creator of the plaque would argue that they are examples of artistic craftsmanship, I don't believe this exception applies. We often talk about 2D versus 3D, but it is important to remember that the dimensional aspect is not in the law, it is our (dare I say) synthesis of the law. Rather than debate whether the raised letters on the plaque make it technically a three dimensional object, we should review what the lawmakers were trying to distinguish. They were generally giving copyright protection to words (and other things) and wanted to carve out an exception, so that people wouldn't be prevented from taking and using pictures of buildings. They explicitly exempted buildings, and then, to make sure that no one got around the law by erecting some art object in front of or in the building, they specifically included such sculptures in the exemption. In that context, it isn't so much a technical definition of whether it is 2D or 3D, it is whether the object, not part of the building itself, is there as an art object. A permanently situated sculpture clearly qualifies, but an informational plaque is there primarily for information, and only incidentally is it artistically designed.
- That we cannot take a picture of the plaque itself does not mean we cannot take a picture of a building with a plaque. If the material subject to copyright is a de minimis portion of the total image, and not the central focus, it is permitted.
- (As an aside I see that the Commons FOP section notes that Body Shop Yonge.jpg qualifies for FOP, arguing that it is a qualifying " non-sculptural work". I think the argument is not exactly right. I think the test I suggest above applies. Although "The Body Shop" is text, it is likely to be part of the architectural drawings of the building, and ought to be considered part of the building, therefore part of the Section 32.2 (1)(b)(i) exception, not part of the Section 32.2 (1)(b)(ii) exception.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that these contain text overrides everything else. There are only nine countries (including Germany and Spain) where FOP covers text and Canada is not one of them. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
could be pd-old. otherwise: Delete McZusatz (talk) 07:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment It is a patent application in an unknown country (likely Netherlands). I have done a Google search on the name mentioned, "F. G. Waller," and found this result in Dutch, which would indicate PD-70, but I don't know if it's the same person. I also did a Google search on "Rookgasverzamelaar" and found two Dutch Wikipedia articles: nl:Econosto and nl:Waller-apparaat. Can a Dutch speaker come sort this out? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alojz Kogovšek
[edit]Work of Alojz Kogovšek (1909-1984). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, ineligible for Commons.
Eleassar (t/p) 09:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Images by FractalStudio
[edit]- File:Guaky, the mascot of the Copa Ameriva Venezuela 2007.jpg
- File:Capy mascot.jpg
- File:Gabino original.jpg
- File:Sofi original.jpg
- File:Sofi2 original.jpg
- File:Guaky1 original.jpg
- File:Sofi1 original.jpg
- File:Guaky diseño original.jpg
Although it's possible that these characters have been created by Fractal Studios, it's seems unlikely that they're the owners of the copyright. Instead, it's the sport event the one that seems to be the owner of the copyright --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 09:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Sounds uploaded by Sefer ibrahim
[edit]Uploader claims Template:PD-AZ-exempt on this recordings. We have two works to distinguish:
- the traditional music (maybe, the uploader not gives us a description), that traditional music can be public domain as described in Template:PD-AZ-exempt.
- the recording work is a different work, it is protected by the law and it is not exempted per Template:PD-AZ-exempt and not free for any reason.
The uploader - who otherwise only uploads stolen content with multiple sockpuppets - is not the person who made the recording, just to make that clear.
- File:Azerbaijan traditional folk sonq Qaragilə (Blackberry).ogg
- File:Azerbaijan traditional folk song Gözəlim Sənsən (Youre my bonny).ogg
- File:Azerbaijan traditional folk song Apardı Sellər Saranı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan folk dances Vokaliz mix by Brilyant Dadasheva.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Mirzəyi.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Qavalı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Tərəkəmə.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Yallı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Qazağı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Vağzalı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Ləzginka.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Dəsmalı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Turacı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Cütçü.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Qaytağı by composed Tofiq Quliyev.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Qaytağı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Kintauri.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Kəsmə.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national Dances - Kənani.ogg
- File:Traditional Azerbaijan and Turkish music which played national musical instruments balaban (Azerbaijan) and ney (Turkey).ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Keçiməməsi.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Heyvagülü.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Fuadi.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Fəridi.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Qaytağı of composer Said Rustamov.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Əsgərani.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Nəlbəki.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Dilşadı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Basqalı.ogg
- File:Azerbaijan national dances - Köçəri.ogg
Martin H. (talk) 09:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HipsterBoys (talk · contribs)
[edit]the uploader tagged the deletion-nominated images as open government license, but the source flickr account (http://www.flickr.com/photos/scottishgovernment/) licensed the images under cc-by-nc license (nc licenses are not allowed on commons)
- File:Paul Wheelhouse MSP.jpg
- File:Michael Materson MSP.jpg.jpg
- File:Aileen Campbell MSP (2).jpg
- File:Derek Mackay MSP.jpg
- File:Alex Salmond (2) Brave.jpg
- File:Alex Salmond at Brave.jpg
- File:Kevin McKidd Brave.jpg
- File:Craig Ferguson Brave.jpg
- File:First Minister Alex Salmond and Craig Ferguson.jpg
- File:Kelly MacDonald Brave Premier.jpg.jpg
- File:Alex Salmond at Summer Cabinet.jpg
- File:Alex Salmond and Mayor Raham.jpg
- File:Alex Salmond Ryder Cup 2014.jpg
- File:First Minister meets with Chief Executive of Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Alex Salmond and David Cameron.jpg
- File:DonaldDewarFirstMinister.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brave.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Puramyun31 (talk) 11:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: well known sock Denniss (talk) 11:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF, bad quality, seem like screenshots from video
- File:Minzy of 2ne1.png
- File:Dara of 2ne1.png
- File:Park Bom of 2ne1.png
- File:CL of 2ne1.png
- File:2NE1 Nolza 2011.png
- File:2ne1 Nolza 2011.png
- File:2ne1 Performing at Nolza in 2011.png
Morning ☼ (talk) 11:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ruban.jpg
Files in Category:Janez Boljka
[edit]Work of sl:Janez Boljka (born 1931). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia not eligible for Commons.
Eleassar (t/p) 12:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Additionally found:
- File:ZOO LJ entrance.jpg
- File:Military Volunteers Monument (1980; Boljka), Mansion Square, Ljubljana.jpg
,_Mansion_Square,_Ljubljana.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Eleassar (t/p) 20:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Janez Boljka died on 20 August 2013, which makes these files eligible for Commons in 2013+71=2084. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ljubljana ZOO
[edit]Non-free reproductions of information boards, created after 1945. Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, ineligible for Commons.
Eleassar (t/p) 12:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amina ashraf khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]there is no evidence of permission to use the deletion-nominated images from credited websites. possibly unfree.
Puramyun31 (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Low-resolution photos with no metadata. The other files uploaded by the user were copyright violations grabbed from Google and Facebook.
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry Morning ☼ (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Divonbriesen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MillcreekrancH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Low quality images advertisement. Also no evidence of permission.
- File:Pavilion Wedding Reception Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Wedding Reception.jpg
- File:Pavilion Venue Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Venue.jpg
- File:Pavilion Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Ranch.jpg
- File:Pavilion Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Rentals.jpg
- File:Pavilion Resort Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Resort.jpg
- File:Pavilion Place Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Place.jpg
- File:Pavilion Patio Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Patio.jpg
- File:Pavilion Hall Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Hall.jpg
- File:Pavilion Garden Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Garden.jpg
- File:Pavilion for Weddings Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion for Weddings.jpg
- File:Pavilion for Corporate Events Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion for Corporate Events.jpg
- File:Pavilion Events Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Events.jpg
- File:Pavilion Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion.jpg
- File:Pavilion Catering Canton TX East Texas 1 Pavilion Catering.jpg
- File:Vacation By Rental Canton TX East Texas 1 Vacation By Rental.jpg
- File:Vacation Homes By Rental Canton TX East Texas 1 Vacation Homes Homes By Rental.jpg
- File:Swimming Pool Resort Canton TX East Texas 1 Swimming Pool Resort.jpg
- File:Ranch Ponds Canton TX East Texas 1Ranch Ponds.jpg
- File:Rental Vacation Homes Canton TX East Texas 1 Rental Vacation Homes.jpg
- File:Ranch Garden Canton TX East Texas 1 Ranch Garden.jpg
- File:Living Waters Ranch Canton TX East Texas Living Waters Ranch.jpg
- File:Living Water Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1 Living Water Ranch.jpg
- File:Landscaping Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscaping Water Features.jpg
- File:Landscape Ranch Water Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Ranch Water.jpg
- File:Landscape Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Water Features.jpg
- File:Landscape Water Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Waters.jpg
- File:Landscape Ranch Garden Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Ranch Garden.jpg
- File:Landscape Fish Ponds Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Fish Ponds.jpg
- File:Garden's Water Feature Canton TX East Texas 1 Water Feature of the Garden.jpg
- File:Garden Ponds Canton TX East Texas 1 Garden Ponds.jpg
- File:Fresh Air Trees Canton TX East Texas 1 Fresh Air Trees.jpg
- File:Flower Garden Canton TX East Texas 1 Flower Garden.jpg
- File:Fresh Air Resort Canton TX East Texas 1 Fresh Air Resort.jpg
- File:Forest Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1Forest Ranch.jpg
- File:Fish Pond Landscaping Canton TX East Texas 1 Fish Pond Landscaping.jpg
- File:Team Building Activities Canton TX East Texas 1Team Building Activities.jpg
- File:Venue for Corporate Retreat Canton TX East Texas 1Venue for Corporate Retreat.jpg
- File:Team Building Amenities Canton TX East Texas 1Team Building Amenities.jpg
- File:Fun Corporate Events Canton TX East Texas 1 Fun Corporate Events.jpg
- File:Events Facilities Canton TX East Texas 1 Event Facilities.jpg
- File:Corporate Vacation Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Corporate Vacation Rentals.jpg
- File:Corporate Retreats Venue Canton TX East Texas Corporate Retreats Venue.jpg
- File:Corporate Team Building Canton TX East Texas 1Corporate Team Building.jpg
- File:Corporate Meeting Room Canton TX East Texas 1 Corporate Meeting Room.jpg
- File:Corporate Event Venues Canton TX East Texas 1Corporate Event Venues.jpg
- File:Corporate Event Location Canton TX East Texas 1 Corporate Event Location.jpg
- File:Corporate Event Entertainment Canton TX East Texas 1 Corporate Event Entertainment.jpg
- File:Corporate Amenities Canton TX East Texas 1Corporate Amenities.jpg
- File:Conference Meeting Room Canton TX East Texas 1 Conference Meeting Room.jpg
- File:Conference Rooms Canton TX East Texas 1 Conference Rooms.jpg
- File:Company Retreat Locations Canton TX East Texas 1 Company Retreat Locations.jpg
- File:Company Retreat Activities Canton TX East Texas 1 Company Retreat Activities.jpg
- File:Company Event Locations Canton TX East Texas 1Company Event Locations.jpg
- File:Business Meeting Venues Canton TX East Texas 1 Business Meeting Venues.jpg
- File:Business Meeting Room Canton TX East Texas 1 Business Meeting Room.jpg
- File:Business Meeting Place Canton TX East Texas 1 Business Meeting Place.jpg
- File:Business Function Venue Canton TX East Texas 1Business Function Venue.jpg
- File:Park Lodging Canton TX East Texas 1 Park Lodging.jpg
- File:Vacation Grand Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 Vacation Grand Lodge.jpg
- File:Swimming Vacation Canton TX East Texas 1Swimming Vacation.jpg
- File:Swimming Pool Parks Canton TX East Texas 1 Swimming Pool Parks.jpg
- File:Swimming Pool Canton TX East Texas 1 Swimming Pool.jpg
- File:RV Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Lodge.jpg
- File:Superior Grand Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 Grand Lodge.jpg
- File:RV Grand Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Grand Lodge.jpg
- File:Pool Vacation Canton TX East Texas 1 Pool Vacation.jpg
- File:Pool Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1Pool Ranch.jpg
- File:Party Hall Canton TX East Texas 1 Party Hall.jpg
- File:Luxurious Lodges Canton TX East Texas 1 Luxurious Lodges.jpg
- File:Park Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 Park Lodge.jpg
- File:Lodge Homes Canton TX East Texas 1 Lodge Homes.jpg
- File:Lodging in Outdoor Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Lodging in Outdoor Park.jpg
- File:Lodging in Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Lodging.jpg
- File:Lodging Canton TX Canton Texas 1 Lodging.jpg
- File:Lodges With Swimming Pool Canton TX East Texas 1 Swimming Pool With Lodges.jpg
- File:Lodge With Swimming Pool Canton TX East Texas 1 Lodge With Swimming Pool.jpg
- File:Lodge Cabins Canton TX East Texas 1 Lodge Cabins.jpg
- File:Grand Portage Lodging Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Portage Lodging.jpg
- File:Grand Lodges Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lodges.jpg
- File:Grand Lodge Resort Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lodge Resort.jpg
- File:Grand Lodging Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lodging.jpg
- File:Grand Lodge Water Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Grand Lodge Water Park.jpg
- File:Grand Lodge RV Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lodge RV.jpg
- File:Grand Lodge Pool Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lodge Pool.jpg
- File:Grand Lake Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lake Lodge.jpg
- File:Conference Hall Canton TX East Texas 1Conference Hall.jpg
- File:Grand Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1Grand Lodge.jpg
- File:Banquet Room Canton TX East Texas 1Banquet Room.jpg
- File:Banquet Facility Canton TX East Texas 1Banquet Facility.jpg
- File:Banquet Hall Canton TX East Texas 1 Banquet Hall.jpg
- File:Wicox Fireplace Canton TX East Texas 1 Wicox Fireplace.jpg
- File:Rentals Private Cabins Canton TX East Texas 1 Rentals Private Cabins.jpg
- File:Rentals Private Cottages Canton TX East Texas 1 Rentals Private Cottages.jpg
- File:Rental House Vacation Canton TX East Texas 1 Rental House Vacation.jpg
- File:Rental Cottages Canton TX East Texas 1 Rental Cottages.jpg
- File:Rent Private Cottage Canton TX East Texas 1 Rent Private Cottage.jpg
- File:Ranch Landscape Canton TX East Texas 1 Ranch Landscape.jpg
- File:Relaxing Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Relaxing Park.jpg
- File:Ranch Cottages Canton TX East Texas 1 Ranch Cottages.jpg
- File:Ranch Cabins for Rent Canton TX East Texas 1 Ranch Cabins for Rent.jpg
- File:Private Vacation Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Private Vacation Rentals.jpg
- File:Private Cabins for Rent Canton TX East Texas 1Private Cabin.jpg
- File:Private Cabins for Rent East Texas 1 Private Cabins for Rent.jpg
- File:Private Cottage Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Private Cottage Rentals.jpg
- File:Private Cabin in Canton TX East Texas 1 Private Cabin.jpg
- File:Lake Cabin Rental Canton TX East Texas 1 Lake Cabin Rental.jpg
- File:Luxurious Cottage Canton TX East Texas 1 Luxurious Cottage.jpg
- File:Private Cabin for Rent Canton TX East Texas 1 Private Cabin for Rent.jpg
- File:Lakeside Cottage Rentals East Texas 1 Lakeside Cottage Rentals.jpg
- File:Cottages at Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1 Cottages at Ranch.jpg
- File:Garden Cottage Canton TX East Texas 1 Garden Cottage.jpg
- File:For Rent Cottages Canton TX East Texas 1 For Rent Cottages.jpg
- File:Cottage Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 Cottage Lodge.jpg
- File:Cottage with Bedroom Canton TX East Texas 1Canton Cottage with Bedroom.jpg
- File:Cottage Rent Canton TX East Texas 1 Cottage Rent.jpg
- File:Cabins at Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1Cabins at Ranch.jpg
- File:Bed and Breakfast Canton TX East Texas 1 Bed and Breakfast.jpg
- File:Cabin By The Lake Canton TX East Texas 1Cabin By The Lake.jpg
- File:Vacation Cabins in Canton TX East Texas 1 Vacation Cabins.jpg
- File:Private Cabins Rentals in Canton TX East Texas 1 Private Cabins Rentals.jpg
- File:Vacation Rentals in Canton TX East Texas 1 Vacation rentals.jpg
- File:Cottage For Sale Canton TX East Texas 1 Cottage For Sale.jpg
- File:Cottages in Canton TX East Texas 1Cottages.jpg
- File:New Cottages Canton TX East Texas 1 New Cottages.jpg
- File:Cottages and cabins in Canton TX East Texas 1 Cottages and Cabins.jpg
- File:Cabin and Cottage Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Cabin and Cottages Rentals.jpg
- File:Cabins & Cottages For Sale Canton TX East Texas 1 Cabins & Cottages For Sale.jpg
- File:Cabin Rentals in Canton TX East Texas 1Cabin Rentals.jpg
- File:Cabin in Canton TX East Texas 1 Cabin.jpg
- File:Buy Cottages and Cabins in Canton TX East Texas 1 Cottages and Cabins To Buy.jpg
- File:Stage Show Canton TX East Texas 1 Stage Show.jpg
- File:Outdoor Night Activities Canton TX East Texas 1 Outdoor Night Activities.jpg
- File:Night Party Canton TX East Texas 1 Night Party.jpg
- File:Midnight Party Canton TX East Texas 1 Midnight Party.jpg
- File:Live Shows Canton TX East Texas 1 Live Shows.jpg
- File:Live Show Canton TX East Texas 1 Live Show.jpg
- File:Kid's Play House Canton Tx East Texas 1 Kid's Play House.jpg
- File:Fun Team Building Activities Canton TX East Texas 1Fun Team Building Activities.jpg
- File:Fun Corporate Outings Canton TX East Texas 1 Fun Corporate Outings.jpg
- File:Entertainment Show Canton TX East Texas 1 Entertainment Show.jpg
- File:Corporate Party in Canton TX East Texas 1 Corporate Party.jpg
- File:Corporate Events Activities Canton TX East Texas 1 Corporate Events Activities.jpg
- File:Company Summer Outing Canton TX East Texas 1 Company Summer Outing.jpg
- File:Band Show Canton TX East Texas 1 Band Show.jpg
- File:Children's Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Children's Park.jpg
- File:Summer Outing Canton TX East Texas 1Summer Outing.jpg
- File:Tie Dyeing Canton TX East Texas 1 Tie Dyeing.jpg
- File:Smores Cooking Canton TX East Texas 1 Smores Cooking.jpg
- File:Smores Cuisine Canton TX East Texas 1 Smores Cuisine.jpg
- File:Park For Family Canton TX East Texas 1 Park for Family.jpg
- File:Paddle-Boat Racing Canton TX East Texas 1 Paddle Boat Racing.jpg
- File:Jewelry Making Canton TX East Texas 1 Jewelry Making.jpg
- File:Fishing Hobby Canton TX East Texas 1 Fishing Hobby.jpg
- File:Fishing Canton TX East Texas 1 Fishing.jpg
- File:Family Fishing Canton TX East Texas 1 Family Fishing.jpg
- File:Easter Hayride Canton TX East Texas 1 Easter Hayride.jpg
- File:Dog walking Canton TX East Texas 1Dog Walking Place.jpg
- File:Disc Golf Canton TX East Texas 1 Disc Golf Course.jpg
- File:Children's Playground Canton TX East Texas 1 Children's Playground.jpg
- File:Chalk Drawing Canton TX East Texas 1 Chalk Drawing.jpg
- File:Bonfiring Canton TX East Texas 1 Bonfiring.jpg
- File:Bicycling Canton TX East Texas 1 Bicycling.jpg
- File:Volleyball Court Canton TX East Texas 1 Volleyball Court.jpg
- File:Boating Canton TX East Texas 1 Boating.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MillcreekrancH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Low quality images advertisement. Also no evidence of permission.
- File:Vacation RV Park Canton TX East Texas 1Vacation RV Park.jpg
- File:Vacation RV Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Vacation RV Rentals.jpg
- File:Vacation Lodging Canton TX East Texas 1Vacation Lodging.jpg
- File:Traveling RV Canton TX East Texas 1 Traveling RV.jpg
- File:RV Vehicles Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Vehicle.jpg
- File:RV Travel With Kids Canton TX East Texas 1RV Travel With Kids.jpg
- File:RV Site Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Site Rentals.jpg
- File:RV Site Canton TX East Texas 1RV Site.jpg
- File:RV Resort Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Resort.jpg
- File:RV Rental Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Rental.jpg
- File:RV Ranch Canton TX East Texas 1RV Ranch.jpg
- File:RV Park Resorts Canton TX East Texas 1RV Park Resorts.jpg
- File:RV Park Resort Canton TX East Texas 1RV Park Resort.jpg
- File:RV Park Canton TX East Texas 1RV Park.jpg
- File:RV Lodge Canton TX East Texas 1 RV.jpg
- File:RV For Rent Canton TX East Texas RV For Rent.jpg
- File:RV for Camping Canton TX East Texas 1RV Camping.jpg
- File:RV Camping Site Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Camping Site.jpg
- File:RV Campsites Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Campsites.jpg
- File:Rv Camping Grounds Canton TX East Texas 1RV Camping Grounds.jpg
- File:RV Camping Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1RV Camping Rentals.jpg
- File:RV Camping Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Camping Place.jpg
- File:RV Campgrounds Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Campgrounds.jpg
- File:RV and Campgrounds Canton TX East Texas 1 RV and Campgrounds.jpg
- File:RV Camp Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Camp.jpg
- File:Private RV Rental Canton TX East Texas 1 Private RV Rental.jpg
- File:RV Allegro Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Allegro.jpg
- File:Red Oaks RV Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Red Oaks RV Park.jpg
- File:Playground RV Park Canton TX East Texas 1 Playground RV Park.jpg
- File:Luxury RV Resorts Canton TX East Texas 1 Luxury RV Resorts.jpg
- File:Luxury RV Resort Canton TX East Texas 1 Luxury RV Resort.jpg
- File:Campsites RV Canton TX East Texas 1Campsites RV.jpg
- File:Campgrounds With RV Rentals Canton TX East Texas 1 Campgrounds With RV Rentals.jpg
- File:Campground RV Parks Canton TX East Texas 1 Campground RV Parks.jpg
- File:Camping in an RV Canton TX East Texas 1 RV Camping.jpg
- File:Breath of Fresh Air Canton TX East Texas 1 Breath of Fresh Air.jpg
- File:Cabana RV Canton TX East Texas 1Cabana RV.jpg
- File:Bonfire Activities For Kids Canton TX East Texas 1 Bonfire Activities for Kids.jpg
Wiki13 15:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MillcreekrancH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, missing exif, some of them marked as copyvio - doubtful authorship. Many of them (maybe all?) can be found in the internet. Advertisement in description - out of project scope.
- File:Garden Water Features Fountains Canton TX East Texas 1Garden Water Features Fountains.jpg
- File:Pond Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1Pond Water Features.jpg
- File:Patio Water Feature Canton TX East Texas 1 Pond Water Features.jpg
- File:Landscape Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Water Features Canton.jpg
- File:Rock Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1Rock Water Features.jpg
- File:Garden Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1 Garden Water Features.jpg
- File:Landscape Water Feature Canton TX East Texas 1 Landscape Water Feature.jpg
- File:Natural Water Feature Canton TX East Texas 1 Naural Water Feature.jpg
- File:Natural Looking Water Feature Canton TX East Texas 1 Natural Looking Water Feature.jpg
- File:Outdoor Fountains and Waterfalls Canton TX East Texas 1 Outdoor Founatins and Waterfalls.jpg
- File:Water Features Fountains Canton TX East Texas 1 Water Features Fountains.jpg
- File:Fountains and Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1 Fountains and Water Features.jpg
- File:Outdoor Water Features Canton TX East Texas 1 Outdoor Water Features.jpg
Art-top (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MillcreekrancH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisment. User did uploaded much similiar images before which are all deleted.
- File:Garden Wedding Canton TX East Texas 1 Garden Wedding.jpg
- File:Outdoor Wedding Ideas Canton TX East Texas 1Outdoor Wedding Ideas.jpg
- File:Wedding Place Canton TX East Texas 1 Wedding Place.jpg
- File:Wedding Reception Canton TX East Texas 1 Wedding Reception.jpg
- File:Outdoor Wedding Canton TX East Texas 1 Outdoor Wedding.jpg
- File:Garden Wedding Flowers TX East Texas 1 Garden Wedding Flowers.jpg
- File:Garden Wedding Arrangement Canton TX East Texas 1GardenWedding Arrangement.jpg
- File:Wedding Vehicle Canton TX East Texas 1 Wedding Vehicle.jpg
- File:Garden Wedding Ideas Canton TX East Texas 1 Garden Wedding Ideas.jpg
- File:Garden Wedding Destination Canton TX East Texas 1Garden Wedding Destination.jpg
- File:Wedding Ceremony Canton TX East Texas 1 Wedding Ceremony.jpg
Wiki13 10:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
deleted; copyvios, promotional, out of scope. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used.
- File:Amanda and her husband Adrian Wong.jpg
- File:Amanda Wong out on the day.jpg
- File:Amanda Wong's arm.jpg
- File:Amanda and Adrian Wong.jpg
- File:Amanda Wong.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adnan ahmad kadhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious copyright status of the frames, given other uploads by this user.
Stefan4 (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: both gone. Trijnsteltalk 20:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adnan ahmad kadhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably out of scope.
- File:Adnan ali.jpg
- File:Adnan hassan.jpg
- File:Adnan.jpg
- File:Adnan -ahmad.jpg
- File:Adnan ahmad.jpg
- File:Adnan ahmad kadhar.jpg
Blond (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
copyvio images and logos with facebook as source
- File:WAR del Ecuador.jpg
- File:Campeonatos de WAR.jpg
- File:Titulos de LWA, XNL, WAR.jpg
- File:Logo WAR Superstrellas.png
- File:WAR del Ecuador.png
- File:Roster WAR del Ecuador.jpg
INeverCry 16:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Denniss Morning ☼ (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Blurry, low resolution, files seem to be uploaded from facebook.
Blond (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Birotvialvi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files from www.circlebakote.com (here and here). Copyright © 2012 Circle Bakote. All rights reserved.
Blond (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Birotvialvi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own works". Small sizes, no EXIFs
- File:Musaddiq Abbasi 01.jpg
- File:GALYAT cIRCLE bAKOTE uNION OF jOURNALISTS.jpg
- File:Hotrol 01.jpg
- File:Hotrol.jpg
- File:Naeem.jpg
- File:Kanair kass nullah.jpg
- File:Babu Pir.jpg
- File:Sahibzada azher Bakoti Usmani.jpg
- File:Pir Bakoti Usmani.jpg
- File:Saeed abbasi 06.jpg
91.66.63.145 14:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 15:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Birotvialvi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Сopyright issues (all images). Even they would be copyright-free almost all of them lacking educational purpose due to bad quality/personal files/photos of unknown people. This user has a long history of copyvios/out of scope content.
- File:Winter in Birote.jpg
- File:BIROTE village.jpg
- File:Poet 01.JPG
- File:Chinjo 02.jpg
- File:Teachers.JPG
- File:Naeem.jpg
- File:Molana Saeed.jpg
- File:Afaq abbasi.jpg
- File:Mudassir Abbasi.jpg
- File:Shabir Ahmed Abbasi.jpg
- File:Naeem Abbasi.jpg
- File:Last bus running in Birote.jpg
- File:Family Tree of Dhund Abbasi tribe.jpg
- File:Kanair kass.jpg
- File:Asif sb.JPG
- File:Alvi birotvi sb.JPG
- File:Asan Nain Nabi Pak Hor.jpg
- File:Testament Pir Bakoti Usmani 01.JPG
- File:Pir Bakoti Usmani Verdict 01.JPG
- File:Majid Pir.JPG
- File:Testament Pir Bakoti Usmani.JPG
- File:Pir Bakoti Usmani Verdict.JPG
- File:Habeeb NA 17.jpg
- File:Weekly Hill News.jpg
- File:Saeed abbasi.jpg
- File:S Abbasi 01.JPG
- File:S Abbasi.jpg
- File:Kanair.jpg
- File:GSBUJ.jpg
- File:Saeed Abbasi.jpg
- File:Saeed abbasi 02.jpg
- File:Saeed Abbasi 01.jpg
- File:Birote Masjid 01.jpg
- File:Ishteaq Abbasi 01.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
and other uploads by Togla64 (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 11:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope, I guess. Rapsar (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Osamaalsaadi (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - no sources - no permission - most of these state source as "my pc" - unfree book covers - newspaper clip - etc
- File:Samvel.jpg
- File:Hashima.jpg
- File:Hashim.jpg
- File:InfluentialPicture.jpg
- File:Hbookaa.jpg
- File:Homaira.jpg
- File:Samvelb.jpg
- File:Jawadi1.jpg
- File:Fadhli.jpg
- File:Hbookb.jpg
- File:NawalSaadawy1.jpg
- File:NawalSaadawy.jpg
- File:Khalilabdulkarim1.jpg
- File:Dar3.jpg
- File:Dar1.jpg
- File:محسن مهدي.jpg
- File:محمد سعيد الحكيم.jpg
INeverCry 19:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- they are free on Arabic websites, I just donit' know how to prove that, and the last one File:Samvel.jpg I MADE IT IN MY PC!!!. is that OK if I give the link of PIC in web? Osamaalsaadi (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all except File:Hbookb.jpg and File:Hashima.jpg. The two might not meet the threshold of originality and might be able to be converted to {{PD-ineligible}}. As far as I can see, the design of File:Hbookb.jpg consists of standard typography and simple shapes and arrangement of colors. File:Hashima.jpg is basically similar, but it looks to have more creative elements and more likely to meet the threshold of originality (especially the cluster on the top-center). Since I'm no expert, I would want to hear from someone who understands Arabic calligraphy and Iraqi copyright law, to be sure. --whym (talk) 22:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per DR discussion. MBisanz talk 19:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo, not used, out of project scope. Art-top (talk) 19:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Keep Encyclopedic use is possible, thus it is in scope - in my opinion. The image quality is ok. --High Contrast (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Since we do not know where it is from, there are a variety of personal rights issues. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Very bad quality photo, there are many better images. Art-top (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Think sometimes before you do something. You could ask first why admin with alright photos uploads such thing. I'm using it to learn people how to upload file to Commons, so leave it alone. Krzysiu (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: temp file for learning ppl. Krzysiu (talk) 20:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- You are uploader of this file, and you should not close this nomimation. Please let other sysop to do it.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Bad quality, unused.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Can't you read? It's used for helping people upload new cool photos for Commons and you want to delete it? In the name of what? It's an example. I'm not sure if I still want to teach them to join the place when some people stop your help, because they didn't bother to read what I've wrote. It has to be without deletion request template and you destroyed it. You have destroyed work of Jah. Krzysiu (talk) 21:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unsharp to the point is hard to know what is in the picture, no use, no quality. Béria Lima msg 21:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dufouryachts (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement. Doesn't have permision either
- File:D500 Final Interior 05.jpg
- File:D500 Final Interior 01.jpg
- File:DUFOUR GL 500 Logo quadri-01.jpg
- File:D500 FINAL Exterior01.jpg
- File:Interieur2 445.jpg
- File:Interior445 gl.JPG
- File:DUFOUR GL 445 Logo quad1ri-0.jpg
- File:YNR 0836.JPG
- File:JM LIOT B4K3848.jpg
- File:B4K3867.JPG
- File:B4K3877.JPG
- File:D405 JMLIOT 38V0224.jpg
- File:DUFOUR GL 405 Logo.jpg
- File:36 Y8L2256.jpg
- File:375 interieur 3.jpg
- File:Interieur 375 2.jpg
- File:Interieur 375 grand large.jpg
- File:DUFOUR GL 375 Logo.jpg
- File:D375 navigation.JPG
- File:Carré.jpg
- File:Cabine AV.jpg
- File:Cabine AR.jpg
- File:DUFOUR GL 335 Logo.jpg
- File:Dufour 335 Grand Large Navigation.jpg
- File:Dufour 40.png
- File:Dufour 36 Performance.png
- File:Paris 2009 salon nautique.png
- File:Salon de paris 2009.jpg
- File:Small corporate logo.png
- File:Michel Dufour Blanc.jpeg
- File:Dufour orange.jpeg
- File:Dufour bleu mer.jpeg
- File:Dufour Noir et rouge.jpg
- File:DUFOUR YACHTS Corporate.jpg
Wiki13 21:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 15:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (No FoP in France and Ieo Ming-Pei is stille alive) Remi Mathis (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:DM, the pyramid is too small in this picture to be considered the main subject IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The Pyramid is in the center of this photo and can't be considered as de minimis. Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Остальные фото с дворцом Лувр и пирамидой, загруженные в рамках WLM 2012, тоже будут удалены? -- Wilwarin (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Kept per NoFoP-France - not the major part of this image Denniss (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic, childish doodle. Is this really what we're here for? (Also do the sums on hydrogen lift vs drag of the bladders. There's a reason airships are so large) Andy Dingley (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Delete This image bears no resemblance to anything that could be considered an "airship". I'd be amazed if those "frames with bladders" were capable of even supporting their own weight, much less providing net lift. --Carnildo (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's not an airship, I just gave it this name since it would operate a little like it, and it was conceived upon reflecting on airship design and making the wikiversity article. The main conceptual design of the airplane was fairly good though (a bit like a P38 Lightning) and I made a better derivate for another project. The bladders may not work to provide (only) a little lift (I don't have any calculations made to confirm this though). I guess you could delete it, but it will leave an ugly red link at the article. Tell me what you think.
- Someone please clue me in here. Does Wikiversity (of which I know nothing) have any sort of quality standard, or is it just a free-for-all? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep in use, therefore in scope. Trycatch (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- That can change though. If it shouldn't be in use (and I can't imagine what its usefulnes to any wiki project could be), then it should be removed. Thatreason to hold onto it would then become moot. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- If Wikiversity has any sort of sensible scope policy, the image will very shortly not be in use. --Carnildo (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Has KVDP now learned to animate? 8-) Andy Dingley (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Kept, file is in use and thus within project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 19:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
This is still a childish doodle. It devalues the project, and is no-longer in use. Serves no purpose. Globbet (talk) 15:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Among other things, as a practical matter gaseous hydrogen is useless as a practical fuel because its energy density is too low. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Still no resemblance to anything that could be considered an airship. --Carnildo (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
No longer any need for this blurred photo when there is File:St. Petri, Hamburg, 10.jpg Vsop.de (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ich bin diesbezüglich auf meiner Disk. angesprochen worden, ich bin aber lediglich derjenige, der sie von der de:wp nach commons geschaufelt hat. Bitte sprecht daher den Urheber de:Benutzer:Michael Wogenstein an, der die Datei vor fünf Jahren erstellt hat. Vielen Dank! --Mogelzahn (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2012 (UTC) PS: Die von Vsop.de genannte Datei ist leider nicht verlinkt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 16:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:St._Petri,_Hamburg,_10.jpg --Vsop.de (talk) 03:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hast Du auch de:Benutzer:Michael Wogenstein angesprochen, denn der ist der Urheber dieses Bildes. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Why should I? Michael Wogenstein didn't bring his photo into commons, so why should he care whether it is deleted here or not? --Vsop.de (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Er hat das Bild gemacht und in ein wikimendiaprojekt einbgebracht. also ist davon auszugehen, dass es ihm auch um das Bild geht. Ich habe es lediglich - da lizenztechnisch möglich - nach Commons verschoben. Einen Löschantrag zu stellen, ohne denjenigen, der das Bild zunächst in ein Wikimediaprojekt eingebracht hat, würde ich als erheblichen Affront deinerseits gegen diesen ehrenamtlichen Mitarbeiter empfinden. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
This appears to be a professional portrait. It is very unlikely that it is "own work" of the subject, as claimed. We will probably need a license from the photographer, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Have asked Prof. Krosnick, whom I have been collaborating with over his article, to email a release from the photographer to OTRS. Churn and change (talk) 20:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't that's an encyclopedic image. Out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep I don't understand why Rapsar felt "oust of scope". It's not valid reason. Takabeg (talk) 02:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Because this image is not an encyclopedic image, and we can not use this in any article. That's why.--Rapsar (talk) 08:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- This image is an advertising of the Turkish Naval Forces. So this is encyclopedic image. Takabeg (talk) 11:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- They just use this image on their website. We can not use this in any article.--Rapsar (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Why ? I can use it. When the propaganda and/or advertisement of the Turkish Navy (and Turkish Armed Forces) is explained, this image is also considerably useful and instructive. Please stop to request deletion only with your POV. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- For example, in this image (File:Ottoman Navy at the Golden Horn.jpg), there is Mehmed V and Ottoman naval ships. The image including Atatürk and Turkish naval ships is also encyclopedic. Takabeg (talk) 05:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is not the same thing. That one has historical importance, and can be used in articles. But this one can't, I think.--Rapsar (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- For example, in this image (File:Ottoman Navy at the Golden Horn.jpg), there is Mehmed V and Ottoman naval ships. The image including Atatürk and Turkish naval ships is also encyclopedic. Takabeg (talk) 05:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Why ? I can use it. When the propaganda and/or advertisement of the Turkish Navy (and Turkish Armed Forces) is explained, this image is also considerably useful and instructive. Please stop to request deletion only with your POV. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- They just use this image on their website. We can not use this in any article.--Rapsar (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- This image is an advertising of the Turkish Naval Forces. So this is encyclopedic image. Takabeg (talk) 11:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Keep could be used under propaganda or posters categories. -- Infestor T • C 22:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It is not propaganda or poster, just a wallpaper :)--Rapsar (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- What ??? Wallpaper can be used for propaganda and/or advertisement. Takabeg (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- "Can" be used, but this not has not been used.--Rapsar (talk) 08:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- "Not in use" is not valid reason to delete images. Takabeg (talk) 11:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- My reason is not "not in use". My reason is that the file is not encyclopedic and we "can not" use it in any article.--Rapsar (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- In short "not in use" is not valid reason and your claim is groundless. Takabeg (talk) 12:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- My reason is not "not in use". My reason is that the file is not encyclopedic and we "can not" use it in any article.--Rapsar (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- "Not in use" is not valid reason to delete images. Takabeg (talk) 11:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- "Can" be used, but this not has not been used.--Rapsar (talk) 08:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- What ??? Wallpaper can be used for propaganda and/or advertisement. Takabeg (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- I think. There is no question in my mind that this is in scope. It is designed to advertise the Turkish Navy and is as much in scope as an recruiting poster or other graphic produced by any military arm of any government. I do not think it is PD, though. It is not covered by any of "laws, rules, regulations, notifications, circular letters and juridical decisions" which is the Turkish exception for government works. I defer to Takabeg, or other Turkish speakers on the question, though. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In scope, no copyright issues here (now has navy PD tag, not the general Turkey PD tag) – Philosopher Let us reason together. 14:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Trnovo Bridge
[edit]The bridge is work of en:Jože Plečnik (1872-1957). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, ineligible for Commons until 2028.
- File:LJ Sv. Janez.JPG
- File:Ljubljana Trnovo cerkev.jpg
- File:Trnovo Bridge - Ljubljana Slovenia.JPG
- File:Trnovski most.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The photos File:Ljubljana Trnovo cerkev.jpg and File:LJ Sv. Janez.JPG could be kept if the bridge is cropped. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:56, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have no objection to deletion of the image "Trnovo Bridge - Ljubljana Slovenia.JPG" Doremo (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment We need someone who is familiar with Slovenian copyright. In the USA, bridges are no covered by copyright, since they are not architecture. If that is true in Slovenia, then the bridge is PD. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- This was never disputed. For example, the city administration of Ljubljana claimed that one of the bridges they copied was below the threshold, but not that bridges can't be copyrighted. Bridges are among copyrighted works also by this article. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've cropped File:LJ Sv. Janez.JPG and have uploaded it as File:Lj. cerkev Janeza Krstnika cropped.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Trnovo Bridge
[edit]Per COM:URAA: the scupture is from 1932 and will enter the public domain in the US in 2028.
- File:Kip Janeza Krstnika na trnovskem mostu z ozadjem Trnovske cerkve (Ljubljana, Slovenija) v2.jpg
- File:Kip Janeza Krstnika na trnovskem mostu z ozadjem Trnovske cerkve (Ljubljana, Slovenija).jpg
- File:Ljubljana (14849316217).jpg
_v2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TadejM (t/p) 16:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peter Gabrijelčič
[edit]Work of Peter Gabrijelčič (born 1947), the current dean of the Faculty of Architecture in Ljubljana. The files are ineligible for Commons due to COM:FOP#Slovenia.
Eleassar (t/p) 10:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep for #1 and #2, no copywritable arhitecture visible here. --Sporti (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Disagree. In #1, the lamps and the fences have a distinctive style. #2, the bridge, is a clear work of architecture, also with its distinctive style. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- So where does #2 stand apart from other similar bridges in arhitecture. All you can see is a common concrete base and a common fence? #1 fence and lamps use only common simple geometrical shapes. --Sporti (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- The Prule Bridge is distinguished by its lookout platform (visible), its shallow pylons (visible), and its two columns (visible) as well as its red brick pavements (not so much visible). Overall, due to this elements it is a creative and original work and as such protected by copyright. Simple geometrical shapes can be arranged into a work of art too. The creator of the Fužine Bridge was awarded the Prešeren Prize, the highest national architectural award, for this work. In this article, Gabrijelčič describes the Prule Bridge designed as a table on water with shallow pylons that enable the view of the river and Fužine Bridge as the most architectural of all the new bridges he designed. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment We need someone who is more familiar with Slovenian copyright. In the USA, bridges are no covered by copyright, since they are not architecture. If that is true in Slovenia, then the bridge is PD. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- This was never disputed. For example, the city administration of Ljubljana claimed that one of the bridges they copied was below the threshold, but not that bridges can't be copyrighted. Bridges are among copyrighted works also by this article. The same is written e.g. here (pg 64) and here (pg 236). --Eleassar (t/p) 22:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Aha -- thank you. I see now that the Slovenian law is much more inclusive than most other countries:
- "9. works of architecture such as sketches, plans, and built structures in the field of
- Aha -- thank you. I see now that the Slovenian law is much more inclusive than most other countries:
architecture, urban planning, and landscape architecture;
- 10. works of applied art and industrial design;
- I could argue that a bridge was at least one of urban planning, landscape architecture, or industrial design. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons FASTILY (TALK) 10:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)