Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/09/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![132 File:Marché couvert"les halles Fréry".JPG](#File:Marché_couvert"les_halles_Fréry".JPG){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Simple text in a jpg, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 00:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 02:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 01:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: undefined INeverCry 03:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Bulleted list item
The illustrator (F. W. Frohawk) died in 1946, so this image is not out of copyright in the UK. Gaurav (talk) 00:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Agree. Place along with other Frohawk images in the "attic". Shyamal (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Similar to other images by this illustrator: Commons:Deletion requests/More artworks by F W Frohawk. Undelete in 2017. 99of9 (talk) 04:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
this is old version of File:Delicate arch viewpoint.jpg Tadam (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
and the name of file is also wrong - letter K in Delicate, so please remove--Tadam (talk) 08:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Speeedy delete, uploaded as version of File:Delicate arch viewpoint.jpg for reference. A.J. (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
słaba jakość, obiekt niewidoczny Tadam (talk) 09:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- In English: poor quality, object invisible. A.J. (talk) 09:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree here. (For the record: museum forbids flash and the room was dark...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 19:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Picture of a non-free licensed poster. Rapsar (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 19:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
no author, wrong licence, no exif, unidentified person AtelierMonpli (talk) 19:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 20:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 19:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 20:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio (watermarked) VIGNERON (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 20:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio VIGNERON (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 20:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio VIGNERON (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 20:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio VIGNERON (talk) 20:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 20:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
This image could not have been taken on that date; Wilkins played on the Knicks in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Zagalejo (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio : the photo can be found on many other websites (for example) VIGNERON (talk) 20:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 22:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 22:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 00:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
There appears to be no permission from the author of this work. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Keep as {{PD-UN}} - see File:Rapport droits de l'homme 1989 01.jpg. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nom -- thanks, Robert . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry - da habe ich die Straße verwechselt. Das ist Bild zeigt die Kohlbrennerstraße 19! Denkmalliste aber: Kunihohstraße 19! Amrei-Marie 16:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Bitte doch behalten!
Ich habe das noch einmal nachrechiert: Es ist das richtige Gebäude. Es war etwas verwirrend, denn die Adresse lautet Kunihohstraße 19, das Gebäude steht aber in der Kohlbrennerstraße 19. (Aber da in dem Haus "Jacques Weindepot" ist, konnte ich jetzt verifizieren, dass die Adresse tatsächlich stimmt. Also bitte nicht löschen! Danke --Amrei-Marie 13:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's request and withdrawn. Bitte in Zukunft {{Withdraw}} verwenden, sonst wird es von einigen semi-automatisch arbeitenden Admins gelöscht. -- Rillke(q?) 18:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- mache ich! Danke! --Amrei-Marie 19:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
CV Non-free content criteria 90.190.70.203 19:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is not clear why this should be non-free content. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Nominated by myself, problem solved by overwriting with a new file. Sunshi79 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
CV Non-free content criteria 90.190.70.203 19:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is not clear why this should be non-free content. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Nominated by myself, problem solved by overwriting with a new file. Sunshi79 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
CV Non-free content criteria 90.190.70.203 19:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is not clear why this should be non-free content. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Nominated by myself, problem solved by overwriting with a new file. Sunshi79 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
CV Non-free content criteria 90.190.70.203 19:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is not clear why this should be non-free content. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Nominated by myself, problem solved by overwriting with a new file. Sunshi79 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
CV Non-free content criteria 90.190.70.203 20:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep --VargaA (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It is not clear why this should be non-free content. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:28, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
copyvio (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nikidel/6907131316/) Reality 06:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete Bingo! Takabeg (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: flickr, copyvio Julo (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused german information table, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 10:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete There is now a simple table in de:Heidelberger Kompetenztraining zur Entwicklung mentaler Stärke#Anwendungsgebiete, so this file is no more needed. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:47, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused Julo (talk) 12:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ComputerHotline as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Lights are protected by copyright / l'éclairage est protégé par des droits d'auteur (comme la tour Eiffel de nuit Denniss (talk) 00:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment I think the lights aren't original. It seems it's just the old disappeared colors. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)- Keep Can't be considered as a original artistic work as these lights show the original colors painted on the calvary. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Édicules Guimard are still under copyright. Hector Guimard is dead in 1943, so nearly 70 years ago but not! As there isn't FoP in France, this file should be deleted and undeleted in 2013. Sebleouf (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Everything is de minimis. Yann (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Totally blurry and low-resolution "image"; unusable. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete again. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as abovve. Yann (talk) 08:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
test image only Danielveyde (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Test. Yann (talk) 08:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 08:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
The first version of the image must be deleted because it shows the car license plate number. For security reason and to prevent the possibility that the image is used by criminal organizations against the people in the image or against the institution. DO *NOT* delete the last version of the file, because there it cannot be seen. thanks. Allions (talk) 21:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: First version deleted, new version kept. Yann (talk) 08:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Useless name, no scope for that reason. Fry1989 eh? 21:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
This is either a CD cover (in which case it needs OTRS permission) or out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 22:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 08:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
It can be read 'Enero 7 de 1971' wich means '7 January 1971'. Therefore that photo from a newspaper wouldn't be in the public domain in Colombia. Lobo (howl?) 00:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Copy to English Wikipedia then Delete: UK has a very low threshold of originality (Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos). en.wiki will allow this as fair use as long as en:Andandand Creative exists, and the logo might also meet the U.S.-centric threshold that guides en.wiki ({{PD-ineligible-USonly}}). --Closeapple (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: Logo of a very small business, so unlikely to meet COM:SCOPE. --Closeapple (talk) 15:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: Not in use and unlikely to come within COM:SCOPE; otherwise, it would require evidence anyway that the licensor was the copyright holder's legal representative, not just a marketing employee who tried to issue a license without authorization. --Closeapple (talk) 15:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Copy to English Wikipedia then Delete: The UK has a very low threshold of originality (Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos); but it's well below the U.S.-only threshold of originality and therefore can remain on en.wiki as ({{PD-ineligible-USonly}}). --Closeapple (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: The straightforward way this could be out of copyright in 2012 is if the author died before 1942, or the logo was created before 1942 and the author was anonymous/pseudonymous. But, in this case, en:Coleman Milne says (without citation) that CM was founded in 1953. Even if the logo was published in the first year, and the author remains anonymous/pseudonymous, the work would still remain in copyright until 1953 + 70 years, so the end of 2023. Sending to en.wiki with {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} makes the point moot, but a better version of the logo there would be preferred; this version has JPEG artifacts even thought it was converted to PNG. --Closeapple (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: Same reasons as Commons:Deletion requests/File:CM LOGO round clear.png; and also has no transparent background. --Closeapple (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Adding File:GN-logo accommodating 2.jpg, which is the same logo and same uploader. Both are tagged cc-by-sa-3.0/GFDL, with no evidence of permission from the company. January (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Just unmodified font and very simple shapes. --Leyo 06:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Only ridiculous! --Zebra848 (talk) 21:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Would you disclose what you think is ridiculous? I think a deletion debate is not very ridiculous but should be carefully and seriously discussed. Since it is a British enterprise, it might be true that it passes TOO there. -- Rillke(q?) 18:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- But who can definitely tell us that it passes TOO? As I can see none of the logos here was deleted after eight months of discussion! What has changed now? --Zebra848 (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo should be applied to this. Fma12 (talk) 21:47, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- But who can definitely tell us that it passes TOO? As I can see none of the logos here was deleted after eight months of discussion! What has changed now? --Zebra848 (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Would you disclose what you think is ridiculous? I think a deletion debate is not very ridiculous but should be carefully and seriously discussed. Since it is a British enterprise, it might be true that it passes TOO there. -- Rillke(q?) 18:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Only ridiculous! --Zebra848 (talk) 21:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I think this is under the ToO, still in the UK. Fma12 (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Copy to en.wiki, then Delete: UK logo; the UK has a ridiculously low threshold of originality, per Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos. (It meets {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} on en.wiki, and en.wiki would allow fair use anyway.) --Closeapple (talk) 06:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of meeting COM:SCOPE; and if it did, it is likely to be a copyrighted work under the UK's very low threshold of originality (Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos) and would require evidence that the uploader is actually the author rather than a marketer who isn't authorized to issue licenses. --Closeapple (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of scope, logo of non-notable company (another version of this logo was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vizual Logo no straplinr.png). January (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Image has been moved to enwiki for article use. Ww2censor (talk) 03:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Crop or Move to English Wikipedia: There is a strong chance that copyright has expired on the "Watsonian" part of this logo. Anonymous/psuedonymous creation before 1942 (or death of a known author before 1942) would mean that copyright expired by 2012 in the most straightforward cases (per Commons:Licensing#Ordinary copyright). watsonian-1914-21.jpg via [1] shows what appears to be a pre-1930s copy of the logo, but it doesn't say so explicitly. But by 1936 different logos were in use instead: see [2] for instance. There are other examples of the logo not being used in the 1930s to 1950s, but I'll save it for a later nomination discussion. Suffice to say that there is a good chance that the "Watsonian" part of the image is pre-1936. The combination of "Watsonian" and "Squire" is almost certainly 1988 or later, though, so the solution here is either to crop it so that only "Watsonian" exists, or move it to en.wiki where {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} makes the point moot. --Closeapple (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Split from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom; possibly unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 01:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Licensing#Exceptions to copyright: It is "not an infringement of copyright to ... photograph ... or make a graphic image of a building, [or] sculpture ... if that work is permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public." in the United Kingdom. This is the British Gas beacon, Gorleston-on-Sea, Norfolk: see http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/678541 (now uploaded on Commons as File:Beacon - geograph.org.uk - 678541.jpg) for context. --Closeapple (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Good faith upload, but, this sculpture is copyrighted by the artist and thus we can't have it on Commons. Sarah (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia, "non free 3D art". Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good faith upload, but, this sculpture is copyrighted by the artist and thus we can't have it on Commons. Sarah (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia "non free 3D art" Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good faith upload, but, this sculpture is copyrighted by the artist and thus we can't have it on Commons. Sarah (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia "non free 3D art" Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't see anything in the link that proves this is a free image. Zagalejo (talk) 04:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
copyvio (http://enjoyarmenia.com/archives/681) Reality 06:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 07:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"life of the author plus 70 years.", made in 1932, it is possible that author was alive in 1942 or later. Bulwersator (talk) 06:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blank image. INeverCry 06:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Not really blank: it contains the german text Wenn Sie diesen Text sehen, stellen Sie bitte "Kommentare und Fomulare" im Drucken Dialog auf "Dokument und Markierungen". This loosely translates to If you can see this text, please do some stuff within the printing dialogue – doesn't have anything to do with the file's description. I opened the file in Inkscape and it doesn't seem to contain anything but this text. → Delete --El Grafo (talk) 11:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. INeverCry 06:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Scan from the cover of his book The Golden Seven Plus One [3] --El Grafo (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom/spam.Érico Wouters msg 14:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom/spam.Érico Wouters msg 14:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wylve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source says the image is based on Centamap, a copyrighted map source. Yann (talk) 06:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Uploader said: The names of buildings. roads and places are sourced from there (where copyright can't be claimed; or do you mean you wish me to do Original Researches?), but the rest are all drawn by myself, so nothing is copyright violated. (User talk:Yann#Please restore my files you've deleted)
This file was initially tagged by Wylve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source says the image is based on Centamap, a copyrighted map source. Yann (talk) 06:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Uploader said: The names of buildings. roads and places are sourced from there (where copyright can't be claimed; or do you mean you wish me to do Original Researches?), but the rest are all drawn by myself, so nothing is copyright violated. (User talk:Yann#Please restore my files you've deleted)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wylve as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source says the image is based on Centamap, a copyrighted map source. Yann (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Uploader said: The names of buildings. roads and places are sourced from there (where copyright can't be claimed; or do you mean you wish me to do Original Researches?), but the rest are all drawn by myself, so nothing is copyright violated. (User talk:Yann#Please restore my files you've deleted)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 06:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 07:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 07:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
blauwe lucht is niet mooi Jellievana (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
foto en tekst komen niet overeen Jellievana (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Despite a good faith upload, this artwork is under copyright of the artist still. Sarah (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia, "non free 3D art" Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 20:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Despite a good faith upload, this artwork is under copyright of the artist still. Sarah (talk) 07:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Despite a good faith upload, this artwork is under copyright of the artist still. Sarah (talk) 07:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia, "non free 3D art" Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 20:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Uploader is not the photografer; photografer is the teacher "Mlle Sonchat", as says Gilles Mairet here. OTRS possible... --MGuf (d) 07:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- My arguments for not deleting this file
Our teacher, who took the photography, gave the negative to my parents when she retired. So, it is clear, for me, that she implicitly abandonned her rights to the photography to my father and mother, who gave it to me. May I add that the picture can have an historical interest as it relies to the Doisneau universe. Gilles MAIRET (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: If that is the case, please send confirmation to COM:OTRS FASTILY (TALK) 02:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Alas, this is also copyrighted :( (see here) Sarah (talk) 07:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Blauwe lucht is niet mooi Jellievana (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
blauwe lucht is kunstmatig Jellievana (talk) 07:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
baluwe lucht is niet mooi/kunstmatig Jellievana (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Sadly, this too is copyrighted. Please see [4] Sarah (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Blauwe lucht is niet mooi Jellievana (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
blauwe lucht is kunstmatig Jellievana (talk) 07:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
baluwe lucht is niet mooi/kunstmatig Jellievana (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I have no intention to delete this image. But there seems to be something fishy here. The image was uploaded first to :de by :de:Benutzer:FluestererMD who was active only for 2 days in March 2010. The image was obviously correctly sourced to the German website fluesterer.com, which is owned by Mathias Sichting. However, I can't see any evidence for a permission from the website or Mathias Sichting. In addition, in the EXIF "Lars Frohmueller" is named as the photographer, whereas the image description provides "Mathias Sichting" as the author. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
In between I've contacted the website owner and asked him for comment. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Mathias Sichting has confirmed that he is the photographer and that he himself uploaded this and some other images on :de. I've forwarded his reply to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
although the image looks funny, I don't really see an educational use. Amada44 talk to me 07:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is still alive. If there were no originality of this signature (for example it were consisted of simple text), we can distribute without permission. However, it's very clear that there is originality. Moreover, can people use this signature for commercial purpose ? I don't think so. Takabeg (talk) 08:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- If it really "very clear" that signatures are considered to have originality under Turkish copyright law, that should be mentioned on Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag with a clear reference to statute or case law. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Source not mentioned clearly. If source was available at fr.wikipedia, it should be ascertained. 120.59.43.178 08:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (seems to be cropped from unknown source): small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
small size, no exif, bus poses for camera (unlikely for amateur photographer). also: see many other copyvios by uploader. Amada44 talk to me 09:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AtelierMonpli as no permission (no permission since)
I think that we can safely assume good faith here. See original file description page in de.wikipedia and uploader's talk page. Leyo 09:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment Yes, i believe good faith. I tagged it with no permission, because we need a photographer and not the club-name of the website. When it is own work it should stand there and not a weburl. --AtelierMonpli (talk) 10:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Copy of File:Old Goa.jpg which is better (without border). Lovy Singhal (talk) 09:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
looks very much like a product image to me. thus copyvio. Amada44 talk to me 09:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Also affected:
Unfortunately, the file has to be deleted since the church was built in 1986, and there is no Freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, фотографию следует удалить, так как церковь была построена в 1986 году, а в России нет свободы панорамы. Ymblanter (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Doubtful self license. Image of Oct 2011? GeorgHH • talk 09:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
The architect of this monument, Eugène Lux (1864-1952) according to this document, page 12, isn't dead for 70 years. As there isn't FoP in France, this file should be deleted. Sebleouf (talk) 10:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
![10:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/09/06#c-Sebleouf-2012-09-06T10:00:00.000Z-File:Marché_couvert"les_halles_Fréry".JPG){kind=link}
Support to delete this file --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
![02:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/09/06#c-Fastily-2012-09-13T02:14:00.000Z-File:Marché_couvert"les_halles_Fréry".JPG){kind=link}
No encyclopedia use - uploaded for use in nonsense/hoax article on en:wp JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
No encyclopedic use - uploaded for use in nonsense/hoax article on en:wp JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Forgot to sort this picture out Mmovchin (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Forgot to sort this picture out Mmovchin (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Empty category: The church's common name is in German, not in English, therefore it's sensible to call the category "St.-Bonifatius-Kirche (Lingen)", not "Saint Boniface Church (Lingen)" as done till now. In fact, all other subcategories of churches in Category:Saint Boniface churches in Lower Saxony are labelled in German, just this one till now was an exemption. As three of the four images in the category are even my own uploads, I moved them to a german-labelled category myself. ThomasPusch (talk) 10:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC) ThomasPusch (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Bona ideo. La fotoj nun estas en Category:St.-Bonifatius-Kirche (Lingen). -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Файл должен быть удален, потому что компания провела репозиционирование в 2011 году и магазины выглядят по-иному. Обновленное фото готовы загрузить. С уважением, Представитель компании ДИКСИ, менеджер интернет-проектов, Наталия Dixy web (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep You are welcome to upload newer photos, but there is no reason to delete this one. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Robert
Sorry for writing to you in Russian. I thought there maybe was a Russian support team as well. I take charge for the digital communications at Dixy and since this is the company page we thought it would be inappropriate to keep the old store picture. Dixy respositioned themselves several years ago and Dixy stores look very different from the one in the picture now. We at Dixy really want to get away from the old image associated with the soft discounter format (you know cheap stores). So could you please delete the current picture - the stores really have a very different look now.
Thanks for your cooperation and if you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them Natalia
- It's okay to write in Russian here, no problem! It's just that I can't write in Russian. I understand that you want to show the modernization process in the article about Dixy. I have now added a photograph of a more modern store; see http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B8_%28%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%29&stable=0 -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately has to be deleted since this 1956 building is still copyrighted due to the lack of freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, фотографию следует удалить, так как здание построено в 1956 году, а в России нет свободы панорамы. Ymblanter (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Не подгружается миниатюра изображения. Она же не видна при вставке изображения в документ. KORTEG (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Private image. No educational content. GeorgHH • talk 12:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, has to be deleted since the architect, Moisey Reysher, died in 1980, and there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. К сожалению, фотографию следует удалить, так как архитектор, Моисей Рейшер, умер в 1980 году, а в России нет свободы панорамы. Ymblanter (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Also affected:
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
The "Grande Arche de la Défense" was build in 1989. Even if this image is just a reflection of it, it's recognizable. And as there is no FoP in France, the file should be deleted. Sebleouf (talk) 13:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think the reflection can get a copyright. But what is this sphere? Yann (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Édicules Guimard are still under copyright. Hector Guimard is dead in 1942, so nearly 70 years ago but not! As there isn't FoP in France, this file should be deleted and undeleted in 2013. Sebleouf (talk) 13:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
I think than you can delete a most of files on this category : Underground station entrances in France
--Sigoise (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Édicules Guimard are still under copyright. Hector Guimard is dead in 1943, so nearly 70 years ago but not! As there isn't FoP in France, this file should be deleted and undeleted in 2013. Sebleouf (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
I think than you can delete a most of files on this category : Underground station entrances in France. --Sigoise (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
I think what might get a copyright here is de minimis. Yann (talk) 10:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
Info Files restored, because the subject is now PD. --Coyau (talk) 02:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Édicules Guimard are still under copyright. Hector Guimard is dead in 1943, so nearly 70 years ago but not! As there isn't FoP in France, this file should be deleted and undeleted in 2013. Sebleouf (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
I think than you can delete a most of files on this category : Underground station entrances in France
--Sigoise (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Info Files restored, because the subject is now PD. --Coyau (talk) 02:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Low-quality, low resolution photoshopped version of File:Vaibhav.jpg. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Who needs an image like this? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
L’architecte (Roger Poyé) est mort en 1958 et le sculpteur Robert Coin en 1988. Pas de liberté de panorama en France. VIGNERON (talk) 14:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in France. Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
foto komt niet met tekst overeen Jellievana (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
blauwe lucht is niet mooi Jellievana (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
foto en tekst komen niet overeen Jellievana (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Pas encore dans le domaine public (pas avant 2030) et pas de liberté de panoram en France. Les architectes sont morts en 1946 (Henri Godbarge), 1940 (Louis Gomez) et 1959 (Benjamin Gomez). VIGNERON (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hector Guimard étant mort en 1942, cet édicule n'est pas dans le domaine public. VIGNERON (talk) 14:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture: "my own photo". Out of scope. Badzil (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Also found in the same resolution, here: [5], though without a publication date. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Linked image not found (svg) McZusatz (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Linked image not found (svg) McZusatz (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hallo, ich habe das Bild (File:2005-07_020Trave-Tunnel.jpg) heruntergeladen, in der Annahme, dass ich die Aufnahme selbst gemacht hatte. Dieses ist jedoch nicht der Fall, ich hatte das Bild im Zusammenhang eines gewonnenen Fluges (2005) von Florian Büh übernommen, dieses aber erst beim Herunterladen wieder festgestellt (siehe auch Diskussion). Hapebalf (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Este archivo no corresponde al edificio que se describe en el titulo ni al ID del monumento Pollencio (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Imagen no corresponde al ID del monumento Pollencio (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Russia. Statue made in 1970 by en:Mikhail Anikushin according to en:1970 in fine arts of the Soviet Union. Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
По какой причине, не понятно? По ссылке, что написано не понял. Свободная фотосъёмка и распространение собственных фотографий гарантированы и защищены законодательством РФ. Но я чего-то не понял, почему номинирован файл, что не так? 13243546A (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I am requesting deletion of this file because I have uploaded a file depicting this same title card but in much better quality, saved as File:Yankee Doodle Daffy title card.png. SethAllen623 (talk) 18:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I am going to upload it directly to Wikipedia. It's a logo, which can only be used in conjunction with a WIkipedia article. Matjamoe (talk) 18:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted at the source DrKiernan (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- The National Portrait Gallery presumably claims copyright for scanning the image. Commons doesn't recognise such claims. The photographer died in 1933, so this image is in the public domain in the United Kingdom (as {{PD-old-70}}). However, there is another problem: Commons images also have to be free in the United States. Given that the photo is a photo of two princesses, it is quite possible that the image is a work of the British government, and in that case it is indeed free in the United States (as {{PD-UKGov}}). However, if it is not a work of the British Governmnent, it is copyrighted in the United States for 95 years since the first publication of the photo, and thus still copyrighted in the United States. Without more information about the photographer's employer, I think that we will have to Delete this image as unfree in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- The uploader is unable to comment at this venue; please see User talk:Pieter Kuiper#File:Margaret and Elizabeth.jpg. DrKiernan (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hector Guimard étant mort en 1942, cet édicule n'est pas dans le domaine public. VIGNERON (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Everything by Guimard is de minimis. However there is the publicity photo, but that might also be DM. Yann (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hector Guimard étant mort en 1942, cet édicule n'est pas dans le domaine public. VIGNERON (talk) 18:45, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hector Guimard étant mort en 1942, cet édicule n'est pas dans le domaine public. VIGNERON (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
It contains nothing the category it is inside doesn't have and seems to have been created for no reason. If anything links here it should be redirected to the main category. Lead holder (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Photograph from family archive, not sure if photographer died over 70 years ago. Out of COM:PS also. Funfood ␌ 19:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Relaying a request from the cheesemaker on the French-speaking Wikipedia, where the picture is used:
I can only find that everyone publishes pictures and products as they see fit, without asking the shepherds (i.e. me in this case) anything. Please remove this picture as well as the article pertaining to Mr Guillaume Acquaviva's cheese. At the very least, we should have been asked. Thanks in advance.
The picture represents a locally-made and locally-sold Corsican cheese. It's used on the article about the village where the cheese is produced; the cheese probably has no notability outside of this specific area. Several issues here:
- the drawing on the label is probably copyrighted;
- the label mentions a name, address, and telephone number — while there is no privacy issue as this is a product label, I think it's fair to say the cheesemaker doesn't expect the information to be published in the whole world;
- apparently the cheesemaker complains on personality rights/trademark grounds — I'm not sure this holds much water.
My own position is a weak delete, as a courtesy to the cheesemaker. Not everyone turns their nose up at free advert. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Strange request. The producer should be glad that his cheese gets a world wide audience... Yann (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Diagram with all pictures doubtfully own work, single upload from user. Funfood ␌ 20:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfully own work, found on various websites also in bigger resolution. Funfood ␌ 20:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Advertising purpose, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 20:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Organization of American States (orthographic projection).svg, with that strange black borders Antemister (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. INeverCry 20:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Violation of Creative Commons License. The file is a derivative work of this map and the uploader's claims that it's entirely his own work are clearly false. The uploader was warned about this issue on 12 August 2012 Trasamundo (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
and File:Colin ronel son.jpg doubtful own work when uploader is footballer himself AtelierMonpli (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:45, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Advertising purpose PDF, out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 20:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 20:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo from http://www.isob.it/ . No indication of permission . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Book cover, too small, unreadable. Funfood ␌ 21:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Kelly (talk) 10:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational value. Not used. INeverCry 21:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 21:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Incomplete image of a building (cinema?) in Edinburgh, focused on the copyrighted film poster (and/or film characters) of en:Brave (2012 film). IMHO, not a COM:DM-case. Per file name "'Brave' cinema advert, Edinburgh 2012.JPG" and intention of photographer, adding the image 4 min. after upload to the article about the film, I would consider, citing COM:DM: "It may be relevant how the image is described or classified: it will be difficult to argue de minimis if the photograph is described as illustrating "an advertising poster"". Summarizing: they are two copyrights issues involved, 1x unresolved. I confess, that I am still unsure where COM:DM begins and ends... Gunnex (talk) 21:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm quite surprised that anyone would find this photograph controversial in terms of a possible breach of copyright. I have photographed a cinema building displaying an advertisement, something that has been done countless times in the history of cinema since about the year 1890. I would argue that this is an accepted practice. Think of the historical images you have seen of posters on cinemas showing "The Jazz Singer", "Gone With The Wind" etc. (In fact, numerous examples are currently on public display in an exhibition on Scottish cinema being held in the National Library of Scotland in Edinburgh.) Such photographs are historical documentation and the copyright is held by the photographer e.g. a newspaper. I honestly don't believe I'm breaching the copyright of the film-makers or poster designer. The subject of the photograph is not solely the advert; it shows the film's prominence, almost as an 'event', and how the ad has been displayed. My motives were 1. to record the showing of that particular film in Scotland, and 2. to enliven the Wikipedia page visually. Many other films can be seen advertised within the image and I thought to myself as I uploaded it, "This is a really valuable source for showing what films were on in cinemas in Sept. 2012." Kim Traynor (talk) 23:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Photo used for promotional article deleted on en [6] Traumrune (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I mistakenly uploaded a duplicate of a photo already in Wikimedia Commons OttawaAC (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as a duplicate of File:Wheelchair Curling Medal Round, Vancouver 2010 Paralympics.jpg. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Source of used photograph unclear, doubtfully self portrait. Funfood ␌ 21:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
False file Mmovchin (talk) 21:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 84.222.124.136 as Speedy (Speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: prova per immagine di servizio Wiki loves monuments, non più utile al progetto, please delete. FASTILY (TALK) 22:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I did the request, sorry but I did'n know that I wasn't logged in, I just mistake. Please delete the file, thanks, it is only a test and raw image for understand the design the interactive map of Wiki loves monuments Italy, now we use the other one, this one is no more useful to the project.--Patafisik (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- ok for me. -- CristianCantoro (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lobo as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope FASTILY (TALK) 22:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Keep Clearly in scope as this shows a car wash in Bikini. There is a subsection about bikini car wash in the English Wikipedia about Car_wash. Why is it then that this file is out of scope. Tm (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lobo as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope FASTILY (TALK) 22:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Keep Clearly in scope as this shows a car wash in Bikini. There is a subsection about bikini car wash in the English Wikipedia about Car_wash. Why is it then that this file is out of scope. Tm (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, inaccurate, better version available. Iketsi (talk) 23:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think that someone could take the logo of a company or sg under free licence. - RepliCarter (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
The architect is living. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
The architect is living. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good faith upload, but, this sculpture is copyrighted by the artist and thus we can't have it on Commons. Sarah (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- keep architectural wall covered by FoP US. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Not covered by FOP see Commons:FOP#United_States PierreSelim (talk) 11:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Good faith upload, but, this sculpture is copyrighted by the artist and thus we can't have it on Commons. Sarah (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- keep architectural wall covered by FoP US. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Not covered by FOP see Commons:FOP#United_States PierreSelim (talk) 11:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Original photo not created by US federal government Officer (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Not created by U.S. Federal Government
Can someone please also delete all of these because they were not created by the U.S. Federal Government and so PD-USGov cannot apply. The government usually obtains from other sources any photo in which the wanted person appears, crop the wanted person's face and post it on their website. I'm sure you know all this.--Officer (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
it's damaged 93.32.131.248 13:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep already fixed--McZusatz (talk) 11:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Fixed. Tiptoety talk 05:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The architect is living. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted by Fastily. Yann (talk) 10:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Image is sourced to something called "spankingart.org," which appears to be a wiki on spanking (and not the child-rearing kind). I don't think that website is trustworthy enough to rely on their copyright release verification procedures. If you look at the source http://spankingart.org/wiki/File:Paddles.JPG , commons would never accept such a specious copyright release. --GrapedApe (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know what makes you think that the site is any less trustworthy than Commons; both are wikis that allow user uploads. You're right that that page itself doesn't provide enough information. This is because Spanking Art Wiki went offline for a while, and "Recovered files were uploaded[,] overwriting their description pages".[7] This is why the uploader appears only as an IP address. However, if you look at the page history you'll see it was uploaded by the user Jameslovebirch, who is a frequent uploader of original images, many of which were taken with the same camera. Handcuffed (talk) 03:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- So, the original upload was lost, raising serious questions about chain of ownership of the image--so the Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle should apply; Further, that same user (even though we have no way of knowing for sure who the uploader was, because the original file was lost) has uploaded clear copyright violations while claiming "own work", including magazine covers, yearbook photos, and a drawing by R. Crumb. That spanking website's copyright management procedures certainly are not on par with Commons' well-known strict copyright management system, so we cannot extend to them good faith, as underlines by the examples of clear copyvios from the same user. It's no different than Uncyclopedia.--GrapedApe (talk) 11:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- The "chain of ownership" was not lost; you can see clearly in the page history that it was uploaded by Jameslovebirch in 2009. I'll grant you that those are copyvios, but it's not as if they're passed off as self-made. The fact that he uploaded other original photographs with the same camera and has created spanking films more than satisfies the PRP in my opinion. Also, Google Search by Image doesn't return anything except a much newer blog. Handcuffed (talk) 00:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- So, the original upload was lost, raising serious questions about chain of ownership of the image--so the Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle should apply; Further, that same user (even though we have no way of knowing for sure who the uploader was, because the original file was lost) has uploaded clear copyright violations while claiming "own work", including magazine covers, yearbook photos, and a drawing by R. Crumb. That spanking website's copyright management procedures certainly are not on par with Commons' well-known strict copyright management system, so we cannot extend to them good faith, as underlines by the examples of clear copyvios from the same user. It's no different than Uncyclopedia.--GrapedApe (talk) 11:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 07:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
it's damaged 93.32.131.248 13:35, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep already fixed--McZusatz (talk) 11:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Fixed. Tiptoety talk 05:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The architect is living. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It's only a small part of the building. Most parts are covered. --McZusatz (talk) 10:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept Too simple to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
All images by Kamenwriter (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:情報処理教育棟.png
- File:38gokan.png
- File:21gokan.png
- File:E-cube.png
- File:Blossom.png
- File:BKAN.png
- File:38号館.jpg
- File:33号館.jpg
- File:情報処理教育棟.jpg
- File:39号館.jpg
- File:Nishimon.png
- File:E-ground.png
- File:Genshiro.png
- File:Kinenkaikan.png
- File:Gkan.png
- File:39gokan.png
- File:33gokan.png
- File:11gatsu.png
- File:Kinkiuniv zenkei.jpg
- File:Kinkiuniv main build.png
- File:不倒館.png
- File:中央図書館.png
- File:Kinkiuniv nishimon.png
- File:生駒祭.png
- File:イルミネーション2.png
- File:水産研究本部.png
- File:Suisankenkyusho.png
- File:イルミネーション.png
- File:Kinkiuniv sang shokudo.png
- File:Kinkiuniv seibu cafe.png
- File:Kinkiuniv seibu arena.png
- File:Kinkiunive oogata.png
- File:Kinkiunive tamokuteki.png
- File:Kinkiuniv sang net.png
- File:Kinkiuniv nougaku jyoho.png
- File:Kinkiunive bauhyutte.png
- File:Kinkiuniv kougakubu libra.png
- File:Kinkiuniv jyoho.png
- File:Kinkiuniv sakai.png
- File:Kinkiuniv kogaku shokudo.png
- File:Kinkiuniv cafe601.png
- File:Kinkiuniv nara.png
- File:Kinkiuniv simu.png
- File:近大 医学部 シミュレーション.jpg
- File:生駒祭 02.jpg
- File:医学部 図書館.jpg
- File:医学部＿道場.jpg
- File:医学部 pet.jpg
- File:医学部 教室.jpg
- File:生物理工学部 キャンパス.jpg
- File:産業理工学部 工作工房.jpg
- File:生物理工学部 学生コミュ.jpg
- File:生物理工学部 図書館.jpg
- File:農学部 実験棟.jpg
- File:農学部 食堂.jpg
- File:農学部 図書館.jpg
- File:Bio cokes.png
- File:Bio cokes.jpg
- File:バウヒュッテ.jpg
- File:産業理工学部メインキャンパス.jpg
- File:次世代基盤技術研究所.jpg
- File:工学部メインキャンパス.jpg
- File:医学部メインキャンパス.jpg
- File:高度先端総合医療センター.jpg
- File:先進医工学センター.jpg
- File:生物理工学部 メインキャンパス.jpg
- File:第二共同研究棟.jpg
- File:農学部キャンパス.jpg
- File:18号館(法学部・通信教育部).jpg
- File:クエ鍋セット.jpg
- File:近大マグロ.jpg
- File:水産研究所施設.jpg
- File:バイオコークス.jpg
- File:トラフグセット商品.jpg
- File:Kinkiuniv caviar.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fake authorships and spam. He said "I've uploaded non-self-made (author-unknown) images by commissioning of others for advertising" on user talk (in Japanese). He was blocked on jawp as a spam account. --Vantey (talk) 01:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Caricatuarte
[edit]w:es:User:Caricatuarte upload files with the intention to create an article about yourself. He violates COM:SCOPE when advertising. I do not know if the license is correct by showing characters figure protected (1980-present).
- File:Realización de caricaturas en CENFER.jpg
- File:Artur.jpg
- File:Depredador.jpg
- File:Homenaje a vilma pala e vampiros.jpg
- File:Caricaturas porcelanicron.jpg
- File:Homenaje a kiko.jpg
- File:Homenaje a la chilindrina.jpg
- File:Juan Caricatuarte realizando a Wolverine.jpg
Metrónomo (talk) 04:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smallbeautyfish (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images/promotional.
- File:Speical musical instrument.jpg
- File:Run run,water coming.jpg
- File:Resting time.jpg
- File:Higher-level techniques.jpg
- File:Mongolian dancing.jpg
- File:Miss to hometown.jpg
- File:Next programme is.jpg
- File:Marriage customs.jpg
- File:Rest ur minds.jpg
INeverCry 06:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. Per nom/spam.Érico Wouters msg 14:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Non-notable subject. AFC for this person declined on en.wiki.
INeverCry 07:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 14:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Estoy de acuerdo que el archivo Video-oculógrafo.jpg debe ser borrado. --Dr. José Perea (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
The works in the category were created after 1945, therefore they are still copyrighted. There's no freedom of panorama in Slovenia; see Commons:FOP#Slovenia.
- File:Burger SlikaGeoss1.jpg
- File:GEOSS flags.jpg
- File:GEOSS monument.jpg
- File:GEOSS Svetovni smerokaz.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 08:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment Please check files before requesting deletion. File:GEOSS Svetovni smerokaz.jpg has already been nominated and was kept as "a natural tree trunk with direction signs", while File:GEOSS flags.jpg as the file name suggests only shows flags. --Sporti (talk) 11:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Flags were designed after 1945 and are not exempt of copyright in Slovenia. Thanks for the comment regarding the image of fingerposts. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 02:27, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Images about Brazilian TV star en:Xuxa. File:XUXA LINDA.jpg might be grabbed (scanned) from publication "Revista pt:Contigo! Edição especial de homenagem Xuxa" (2009, details. For all: Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
Gunnex (talk) 09:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Personal unused photos, shown person claims own work but no self portraits. Out of COM:PS also.
Funfood ␌ 10:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 01:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in Greece. Rd232 (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- That is correct, there is no FOP in Greece and on uploading this photograph I made no claim under Freedom of Panorama.
- This example of graffiti is not a community mural but a criminal act, defacing a government building on the main square in Sami. If the creator of this graffiti were to attempt a claim of copyright, they would in the process publish their legal identity and expose themselves to prosecution by the Greek government. I believe this scenario creates an exception under Greek law, as a claim of copyright cannot be made where this would result in direct benefit from a criminal act. Consequently there can be no claim of copyright for this graffiti as a creative work. The only tangible or realistic copyright here is my photograph which has been released on the license stated and there is not that "significant doubt" that would be needed under the precautionary principle to justify deletion due to concern for the potential copyright of the original
artistvandal. --Fæ (talk) 15:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)- The thought crossed my mind that you were asserting that (copyright disappears because it's a work created as a criminal act), but I don't know if the assertion is correct, hence the DR. Rd232 (talk) 15:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- The consideration should be under Greek law, however there are no prior cases in that country that one would refer to (of a graffiti artist claiming the benefit of copyright for their works when created illegally), as far as I am aware. Any discussion here would have to be somewhat theoretical and focus on the nature of our interpretation of what is "significant doubt", or not. --Fæ (talk) 15:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- The thought crossed my mind that you were asserting that (copyright disappears because it's a work created as a criminal act), but I don't know if the assertion is correct, hence the DR. Rd232 (talk) 15:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Image_casebook#Graffiti (which I didn't think to check - I suggested renaming that page because I'm sure the name contributes to me forgetting about it...) suggests any copyright on illegal graffiti may be hard to enforce, even if the law recognises it in principle. And the law isn't necessarily clear (see eg here for US). So... it seems to be considered an exception to COM:PRP, because it's so unlikely that copyright would be successfully enforced. But: there should really be a tag for such cases, to make it clear that the issue of the underlying copyright has been considered, as well as for tracking. like er {{Non-free graffiti}}... Rd232 (talk) 16:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that's the rationale I was attempting to express above. In essence there is no agreed legal principle or working guidance in relation to copyright to apply in this scenario, especially when the nearest legal cases are tangential and appear limited to countries where this photograph was not taken. As the Non-free graffiti template suggests, PRP does not appear to apply, and in my rationale, we can consider that any doubt is not "significant" in any way that is not extremely theoretical and hypothetical. --Fæ (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- But wouldn't it be theoretically possible that the sprayer could still sue use re-users outside of Greece without having to worry about own prosecution? In this particular case i doubt that he ever would (proud to have a picture of his act), but in other cases i would not be so sure. --／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 署名の宣言 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think this is the wrong point. We need to assess if there is "significant doubt" here or not. Very theoretical arguments which are not based on any past enforcement of copyright or any concrete case law cannot be considered significant doubt. To clarify, there has never been a legal case where someone creating illegally placed graffiti has sued re-users of a photograph of that graffiti regardless of the artistic content of that graffiti. There have been tangential cases (such as cases raised by the property owners to keep the graffiti against action by local government) but these do not set a precedent to determine if the graffiti artist has an enforceable or recognized legitimate copyright that would either hamper photographers of the work or the later re-use of such photographs.
- Commons should make a reasonable judgement on photographs based on existing interpretation of copyright law that we can support by example cases. If we go off on hypothetical tangents in order to find incredibly weak and unsubstantiated reasons to delete images, then our mission to preserve open knowledge and as a consequence social and cultural history, is seriously under threat by wikilawyering ourselves out of any useful existence. --Fæ (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- But wouldn't it be theoretically possible that the sprayer could still sue use re-users outside of Greece without having to worry about own prosecution? In this particular case i doubt that he ever would (proud to have a picture of his act), but in other cases i would not be so sure. --／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 署名の宣言 07:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Illegal graffiti, therefore no copyright. Yann (talk) 08:35, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- See also this and the resulting DR. If you sue someone 25 years after painting the graffiti, you are safe. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Stefan, that is a very interesting case study, though there are key differences to this case. What are your thoughts on how realistically this can apply to Greece or other countries, or the fact that as an example case this related to the use of a stencil (rather than a unique graffito) which was used in multiple locations, probably both legally and illegally? I also note that I do not think this was a test case in a court of law, only that a warning letter resulted in the image being removed by consent. --Fæ (talk) 04:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- In the other deletion request, User:Jastrow mentioned some French case from 2006.
- Thanks Stefan, that is a very interesting case study, though there are key differences to this case. What are your thoughts on how realistically this can apply to Greece or other countries, or the fact that as an example case this related to the use of a stencil (rather than a unique graffito) which was used in multiple locations, probably both legally and illegally? I also note that I do not think this was a test case in a court of law, only that a warning letter resulted in the image being removed by consent. --Fæ (talk) 04:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- The main idea of COM:CB#Graffiti seems to be that it is usually impossible to prove that you are the artist. If you tell someone that "I drew this", then you would probably also have to present some evidence for the court that you really are the artist if you wish to claim compensation from a potential copyright violator. Compare with the usual situation of copyright violations on Commons: if you upload a random photo from a random website to Commons, no one will trust you if you say that you took the photo, and you need quite good evidence (via OTRS) if you want the picture to stay. If you have some random, anonymous street art, it might turn out impossible to prove that you are the artist. Thus, COM:CB#Graffiti seems safe for most anonymous works. However, if a work is signed, it gets scarier. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:CB#Graffiti INeverCry 02:36, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 20:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Source "facebook" inconsistent with user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIOs.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Facebook images are not allowed. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonia626 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo/fan photos.
- File:Volcanica 1.gif
- File:Volcanica Icon.jpg
- File:Alejo-Volcanica.gif
- File:Volcanica-Negro1.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Negro0.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Alejo1.JPG
- File:Volcanica-Alejo0.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Surianu2.JPG
- File:Volcanica-Surianu0.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Angel1.JPG
- File:Volcanica-Angel0.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Helut3.JPG
- File:Volcanica-Helut2.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Helut0.jpg
- File:Volcanica-Helut1.jpg
- File:Volcanica 3.gif
- File:Volcanica 2.gif
- File:Surianu Negro.gif
- File:Angel Helut.gif
- File:Helut Alejo.gif
- File:Negro-Volcanica.gif
- File:Surianu-Volcanica.gif
- File:Angel-Volcanica.gif
- File:Helut-Volcanica.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 20:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Delete all. Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 04:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lyndiatitus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 20:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 13 September 2012 (UTC)