Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
SVG at File:HIFI logo.svg Fry1989 eh? 02:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The existance of an SVG does not make the png version deleteable in and of itself. Generally both versions are kept. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Eqhd.svg Fry1989 eh? 02:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The existance of an SVG does not make the png version deleteable in and of itself. Generally both versions are kept. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, no use, SVG exists. Fry1989 eh? 04:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The existence of a similar, but not identical, SVG is still not a valid ground for deletion. Sven's rationale from a a year ago still applies. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
SVG at File:FX Canada.svg Fry1989 eh? 02:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The existance of an SVG does not make the png version deleteable in and of itself. Generally both versions are kept. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Comedy Gold 2012.svg Fry1989 eh? 02:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The existance of an SVG does not make the png version deleteable in and of itself. Generally both versions are kept. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Unused self-promotional personal photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- yah I Support You. Ramesh Ramaiah (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: no problem for the uploader Denniss (talk) 11:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Also uploaded as File:Flag of Croatia-Slavonia with CoA.svg Fry1989 eh? 01:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Damn it, a stupid mistake. Didn't notice that. Feel free to delete forthwith, apologies. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 01:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- They're not totally identical. You sure you want this one deleted? Sven Manguard Wha? 03:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yup. Its basically an accident. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 13:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- They're not totally identical. You sure you want this one deleted? Sven Manguard Wha? 03:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request; mistaken upload Sven Manguard Wha? 01:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
no me gusta Brandonem12 (talk) 03:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Wutsje. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
copyvio, copyrighted material JAn Dudík (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Martin H. (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Invasion of Privacy--Photograph taken in a private place. Individual is a private person and did not consent to the publication of the photograph or use of her name. The photo does not relate to any issue nor link to any articles--THIS IS NOT SOCIAL MEDIA. The photograph(s) was requested by the owner (on the right) *only* to help him remember the people with whom he had spoken. Zzzquil (talk) 19:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Invasion of Privacy--Photograph taken in a private place. Individual is a private person and did not consent to the publication of the photograph or use of her name. The photo does not relate to any issue nor link to any articles--THIS IS NOT SOCIAL MEDIA. The photograph(s) was requested by the owner (on the right) *only* to help him remember the people with whom he had spoken. Zzzquil (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Invasion of Privacy--Photograph taken in a private place. Individual is a private person and did not consent to the publication of the photograph or use of her name. The photo does not relate to any issue nor link to any articles--THIS IS NOT SOCIAL MEDIA. The photograph(s) was requested by the owner (on the right) *only* to help him remember the people with whom he had spoken. Zzzquil (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file is duplicate. Dudek1337 (talk) 22:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete You don't need to list duplicates for deletion - they can be speedied with the {{Duplicate}} template. --Ytoyoda (talk) 02:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm BPositive, who is the author of this animation file. Actually, I usurped BPositive and was originally User:Pratiklahoti8004. I have no problems in this getting deleted. Had created it long back for testing purpose. Delete it. BPositive (talk) 08:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
"Don't fuck with us Wikipedia" JeanBono (talk) 07:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, no educational value, and expletive in image. INeverCry 22:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
copyrighted from facebook : http://www.facebook.com/pages/Figgaart-Studio/305115562831932 JeanBono (talk) 07:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete copyvio. --Art-top (talk) 18:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 22:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 22:42, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
OTRS will not be available; the author answer in emails his agreement about the free licensing, but do not change the licensing in his website source acordind with wikipedia Riba28-maps (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment That is not necessary, as long as a valid release is received and archived in the OTRS system. I've added the ticket, which contains a release in Portuguese but doesn't make a lot of sense in Google Translate, so I'll defer to a Portuguese-speaking OTRS volunteer to ensure the license is valid. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received Béria Lima msg 20:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from the Swedish Energy Agency - http://energimyndigheten.se/en/ Tournesol (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Tournesol is correct. This file was uploaded by mistake, and done without a good enough comprehension of the trademark and copyright implications. Please delete this file. -Energimyndigheten (talk) 11:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope - too small George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope. A t-shirt promo George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:12, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. INeverCry 18:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
This is an image I uploaded myself, there is no freedom of panorama in the US and the statue was erected in 1993. I'll upload a different version locally with a fair use rationale. Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:07, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above. INeverCry 18:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio, the watermark from Sulekha.com is visible on the image. —SpacemanSpiff 05:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above. INeverCry 18:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Author died in 1964, which is not 70 years ago. No information on artist of cover for PD either. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Better SVG at File:Logo TVE-HD.svg Fry1989 eh? 00:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The page indicated for permission, http://www.queenston.ca/index.html, only says copyright 2012 Queensland Mining heather walls (talk) 00:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The page indicated for permission, http://www.queenston.ca/projects/cadillac/index.html, only says copyright 2012 Queensland Mining heather walls (talk) 00:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The page indicated for permission, http://www.queenston.ca/projects/kirkland/index.html, only says copyright 2012 Queensland Mining heather walls (talk) 00:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This file is tagged as being in the public domain, but the owner of the copyright recently stated on English Wikipedia that the file is copyrighted. Another version has been uploaded locally on Wikipedia with fair-use rationale, and this file should be deleted. Jmajeremy (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This file is tagged as being in the public domain, but the owner of the copyright recently stated on English Wikipedia that the file is copyrighted. Another version has been uploaded locally on Wikipedia with fair-use rationale, and this file should be deleted. Jmajeremy (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This file is tagged as being in the public domain, but the owner of the copyright recently stated on English Wikipedia that the file is copyrighted. Another version has been uploaded locally on Wikipedia with fair-use rationale, and this file should be deleted. Jmajeremy (talk) 00:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This file is tagged as being in the public domain, but the owner of the copyright recently stated on English Wikipedia that the file is copyrighted. Another version has been uploaded locally on Wikipedia with fair-use rationale, and this file should be deleted. Jmajeremy (talk) 00:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This file is tagged as being in the public domain, but the owner of the copyright recently stated on English Wikipedia that the file is copyrighted. Another version has been uploaded locally on Wikipedia with fair-use rationale, and this file should be deleted. Jmajeremy (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Derived work of a copyrighted sculpture. FoP doesn't apply because it's not on permanent display. The same applies to the rest of its category. Ghouston (talk) 01:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Is this free? It has been used as non-free on enwp for years, Courcelles 01:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Greece. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused photo originally uploaded for user page on en.wp. Has been replaced by a newer photo (to be retained only on en.wp). Horologium (talk) 01:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Flag of Mexico.svg Fry1989 eh? 01:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete: This image, with different text on the nose, is found by tineye on a few webpages. I highly doubt the uplaoder, who claims it as his own work, actually took the photo and is the copyright holder. He probably just changed the text to IPDS and believes this allow him claim copyright just as hs did with File:IPDS.jpg which he also claimed was his own work but for which tineye found many more images. Ww2censor (talk) 01:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Is in fact a DW of File:MiG-17 landing by StuSeeger.jpeg, but this modification makes it out of scope. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: dupe russavia (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject of this image which he claims is his own work. SInce he is blind, it seems unlikely that he could have actually taken the photograph, even with a self-timer. Therefore, in order to keep the image, we will need a licenses fromn the actual photographer. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject of this image which he claims is his own work. SInce he is blind, it seems unlikely that he could have actually taken the photograph, even with a self-timer. Therefore, in order to keep the image, we will need a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete same opinion, includes plenty of textMotopark (talk) 04:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Need permission from photographer. Also possible scope issues russavia (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC) Deleted: INeverCry 20:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 13:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; redirect File:Vivek.JPG.jpg included. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Brandon elizondo
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 03:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
It is highly doubtful that this "photoshoot picture" is the uploader's own work. I feel OTRS would be required for this one. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
False claim of own work by serial offender. Image is too complicated to be PD. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. This file seems to be a picture of a personal letter accusing a company. whym (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:S-kyurin-yami2.jpg. --whym (talk) 05:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. This file seems to be a picture of a personal letter accusing a company. whym (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:S-kyurin-yami1.jpg. --whym (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- In addition I believe this has potential privacy concerns. The real name and descriptions of career and medical history of a non public figure are depicted in the picture. --whym (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
nonsense file, out of scope. C messier (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
No FoP in Saudi Arabia. Note: Transferred to English Wikipedia. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm BPositive, who is the author of this image. Actually, I usurped BPositive and was originally User:Pratiklahoti8004. I have no problems in this getting deleted but would like to know why is this out of scope of project? BPositive (talk) 08:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is out of scope because personal images are supposed to be in use on a userpage or talkpage. INeverCry 22:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment or weak keep: This is a generic, if (if I may say so) a bit garish "Welcome to my user page!" banner which could be potentially used by any user on any project - it's not a personal image in the sense of a a photo depicting a specific user, or a "Welcome to BPositive's user page" banner. Gestumblindi (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- This is out of scope because personal images are supposed to be in use on a userpage or talkpage. INeverCry 22:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This was uploaded a year ago and hasn't seen any use. Uploader doesn't want to keep it. INeverCry 02:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. INeverCry 05:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Lymantria (talk) 07:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. INeverCry 05:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Lymantria (talk) 07:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
incorrect image uploaded Boston Matthews (talk) 08:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Although the uploader stated that this image (or image elements) are not copyrighted, i'm nominating this image for deletion as a copyrighted magazine cover. Smooth_O (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete, and I've tagged it as such. This is a blatant copyright violation. Yes, the painting is old and out of copyright. The cover of the magazine includes copyrightable elements that are not out of copyright. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep This is not a copyvio for the reasons mentioned in the license section. The photograph on the cover is a faithful reproduction of a 2D artwork, and therefore public domain in the United States (see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag). The only other elements are a bit of text, which is too simple to be copyrighted (see Commons:Threshold of originality). InverseHypercube 23:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)- Comment The logo clearly meets the threshold of originality, and it'll be a hard case to argue that it's DM since the whole point of the image is to show a National Geographic cover. Maybe if the logo were censored by being blurred, the rest (including layout, text, etc.) will fall below it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- migrate to en:wikipedia "non-free cover" Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 23:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Contains copyrighted logo. Also the complete layout of this frontpage seems to meet the threshold of originality in my opinion: the head of the reproduction goes over the "National Geographic" headers, while other elements stay below it. That is more than just dumping a text over a 2d-reproduction. Lymantria (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Image of a book cover and possibly has been taken from here. Rapsar (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Image is taken in 1956, so it's not in public domain. Smooth_O (talk) 10:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Italy-only PD is not valid here. Should have obeyed the "do not transfer to Commons" tag on it.wiki. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Iraq Stefan4 (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
One of the photos was deleted as a copyright violation: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bertrand Russell 1950.jpg. Also, some pictures are unsorced. Stefan4 (talk) 11:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted material: ©UP-FRONT AGENCY すけ (talk) 12:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Unclear file permissions. Metadata on the upload indicates a different author (viz. "foto mauro di locatelli mauro" or "photos of mauro mauro locatelli") than that cited by the uploader Malindu1988, who claims it as his/her own work. The copyright holder parameter also indicates that the picture should be accredited to FOTO MAURO Brembate di Sopra 035 621955 o www.foto-mauro.it. In addition, there's an identical image content-wise on flickr that is a part of Magdi Cristiano's official photostream [1]; however, it is All Rights Reserved. Middayexpress (talk) 12:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Esta imagen una reproducción incorrecta del emblema oficial de las fuerzas Armadas dominicanas y podria generar confusion. Cheposo (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
derivative work (main element is photo on the poster, and this photo is clearly copyrighted) FA2010 (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Poor quality; alternatives available: File:Proflavine structure.png, File:Proflavine.svg. Leyo 14:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be subject (doubtful), no evidence that uploader is copyright holder, author said to be Joao Job. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Asianomainen toivoo sivua poistettavaksi 84.251.19.224 18:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
нарушение авторских прав - фото явно не заявителя, а скан офсетной печати, да и цветной вариант в истории в пользу нарушения авторских прав Wolkodlak (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Badzil as no permission (no permission since).
It is a "star with a fan-photo". Not likely to be taken by a professiona. I found no hits on Google - except one where the photo was taken from Commons. So I do not think we have reason to think it is from the Internet. MGA73 (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed, in the absence of probable cause, Keep King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from here: http://www.safusionfc.com/Trainers.html Ytoyoda (talk) 20:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 18:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Taken from: http://proworldsport.com/en/players/javier-franco-cortes.html Ytoyoda (talk) 20:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 18:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Das Bild wurde mit falschem Dateinamen hochgeladen. Elcom.stadler (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be lifted from this Tripod (!) site: http://hernanposada.tripod.com/ivanleonardolopezlicht/ Ytoyoda (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 18:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Illustration is by Horace Knight, date of death unknown (see en:File:Catocala ophelia2.JPG). —innotata 21:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Copied from vandystadt.com. "Copyright Christophe Guibbaud / Agence Vandystadt." Badzil (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Used for selfpromotion on nl:User:CommissievanDijk and nl:User:CommvanDijk (both deleted by now). Trijnsteltalk 21:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
4 uploads so far by user = 2x copyvio via flickr and 1x unsourced logo, all declared as self work. This one: Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolution & exif. Identical (in size & exif) to [2] = [3]. Gunnex (talk) 21:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The caption of the picture on Flickr says: "The license on this photo has been changed from Creative Commons to Copyright due to a request from the IOC: richardgiles.com/2009/10/14/the-olympics-and-creative-com..." Badzil (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Additional files with the same problem:
- File:Mumbru Rudy Beijing Olympic.jpg
- File:Mumbru Beijing.jpg (derivative work)
- File:Marc Gasol Beijing Olympics.jpg
- File:Kobe Bryant Beijing Olympics 1.jpg
- File:Kobe Bryant Beijing Olympics 1crop.jpg (derivative work)
- File:Paolo Quinteros-Juegos Olimpicos 2008.jpg (derivative work)
- File:Paolo Quinteros-Juegos Olimpicos 2008(2).jpg (derivative work)
- File:Summer Olympics 2008 - Kobe Bryant.jpg
- File:Beijing Olympics, Closing Ceremony, Yao Ming.jpg
- File:Summer Olympics 2008 - Lyudmila Blonska.jpg
- File:Summer Olympics 2008 - Anna Bogdanova.jpg (derivative work)
- File:Beijing Olympics- Closing Ceremony.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Badzil (talk) 21:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- This reasoning would apply to most of all pictures from Olympia?!? -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 12:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I would think that it would apply only to the pictures where the license has actually been changed. Badzil (talk) 12:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's very unclear!? I think the IOC mean this generally, not only for "some selected" pictures. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 12:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think the IOC is simply not entitled to claim copyright over images they haven't made by themselves. In regard to the IOC claim, we should consider it as Commons:Non-copyright restrictions, which we usually ignore if nobody suffers any damage.
- In regard to the images by Flickr-user Richard Giles, we should delete all images from the last olympic games (if there are any from him on Commons), in order to not expose him to legal problems on behalf of the IOC. However, with images from the olympic games in 2008, don't know; needs discussion.
- To minimize legal risks for re-users we might consider tagging these images with a sort of warning template (as we do with shots under freedom-of-panorama exemption). However, we should consult with WMF legal about whether this approach is o.k. for the foundation. --Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I would think that it would apply only to the pictures where the license has actually been changed. Badzil (talk) 12:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but this would not be a applicable law!? Also retroactive licensing / reverting is not applicable from flick to Commons!?see also -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 12:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ähem, not sure what you mean by "applicable law". Though IANAL, I'm rather sure about that the IOC cannot really interfere with copyright. My approach was guided by the aim to reduce legal risks for the photographer (who is now fully identified to the IOC) and for re-users. In case the IOC, with all the money they have, gets a ruling, even if premature, against the photographer, he may be financially dead. We should not let that happen. The same might happen with re-users, provided the IOC follows such a path, which may be unlikely for images from earlier olympic games. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but this would not be a applicable law!? Also retroactive licensing / reverting is not applicable from flick to Commons!?see also -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 12:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- At least we should not delete before the Flickr-Uploader indicates (s)he received a C&D-Letter. This way the Flickr-user only has a small chance to get sued and the IOC has plenty of work. In this case, I am not sure; there are lots of good great photos by this Flickr-user. If he is in trouble due to files on Commons, we should, of course delete but did he tell so? If not, a warning tag for reusers might be enough. At least the IOC claims to be concerned about personality rights (protect the rights of the athletes appearing in the photos) and does not intend to censure the Olympic spirit. -- Rillke(q?) 13:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Update for Olympia 2012: As Ralf, who reported from London, has just commented at the Forum[4], there were no such restriction in this years olympic games and actually the IOC used one of Ralf's images under a CC-BY-SA license. So the problem seems to be restricted to 2008. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment The question is who did this request in the IOC to re license the pics, the Chinese IOC responsible guys, Lausanne or someone else?--Sanandros (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: IOC has no power over the copyright. I would delete if the photographer asks because he might have a problem with the IOC, but this is still unlikely. Yann (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BreatheInLife.jpg Eduardopb (talk) 21:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Flickr user is not the photographer. The whole flickr account is created to serve as an image hoster for some website. But the photos are not self-created but plagiarized from elsewhere, in this case from universalbikeracing.com with credit to the true author. I find other files on that flickr account from Press Agencies with wrong CC-by licenses and without any credit, the Flickr account WorldXCmtb worth blacklisting at COM:QFI. Martin H. (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
See EXIF: (C) EGO-Promotion, Armin M. Küstenbrück. The flickr user worldxcmtb is not a reliable source but only abusing flickr as a photohosting service for a website. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Litscher world champion u23 2011.jpg. Martin H. (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfully own work, found on many webpages. Funfood ␌ 22:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The file is from this jpg from website http://www.photo13-17.it/. See author info in the EXIF. The flickr user is not reliable, its someone abusing flickr as a filehosting service for some website. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Litscher world champion u23 2011.jpg. Martin H. (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Flickr user WorldXCmtb is plagiarizing from other sources. This photo is from http://www.londontown.com/LondonInformation/London-Olympics/London-Olympics-Hadleigh-Farm/874de/ courtesy of Hadleigh Farm, posted there in August 2011. The flickr uploader added it on January 14. Martin H. (talk) 22:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Photographers and rights of used images unclear AtelierMonpli (talk) 22:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Smaller on products site http://provillusz.com/ , doubtfully own work of uploader. Funfood ␌ 22:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm BPositive, who is the author of this file. Actually, I usurped BPositive and was originally User:Pratiklahoti8004. I would like to this to be kept as I might need it later sometime. BPositive (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons personal file hosting service. FASTILY (TALK) 06:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
No scanning EXIF tag. No description. No photographer name. Dereckson (talk) 10:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- However, the source is given quite clearly, and I have no reason to think that Instituto Ayrton Senna (the apparent owner of the Flickr account) does not have legal right to the photo. The description given in the title is enough to identify subject, date and context for most uses. I see no reason to delete this. Pyrope (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The image on Flickr is watermarked "Fotos: Fred Scatley - ASE". I think it is very possible that Instituto Ayrton Senna has ignored Scatley's copyright when they posted this to Flickr. It also means that the uploader was aware of this possibility and deliberately removed the watermark. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:File:Norsefire-flag-comic.png UK have a low COM:TOO but I can't help wondering if a N on a flag is enough. It seems rather simple to me. MGA73 (talk) 11:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - as I've pointed out elsewhere, the threshold of originality is extremely low in the UK. Even the slighest alteration to the letter is enough to rise above the threshold: even signatures are copyrightable. In this case, it is not a simple N and a simple flag; there is, er, waviness to the flag, and personality to the N. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Template was used to categorize a deleted work (copyrighted until 1/1/2030), therefore it's no longer needed. (See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gedichte Gedichte (Ringelnatz)) cmadler (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: no longer needed Wvk (talk) 21:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Alisma michaletii is a synonym of Alisma plantago-aquatica Thiotrix (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Very small image with no EXIF from a contributor that uploaded only one file. High chance that this is copied from the web. Badzil (talk) 18:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I found no hits on Google - except one on Facebook that sources the file to Wikipedia. It was uploaded on en-wiki via the placeholder system where we asked everyone reading an article "Hey, do you have a free photo? If yes please upload it." That way we catch users who if not normally active on Wikipedia and therefore it is not strange that some users only upload one file. And new users would not know that we prefer files with EXIF (we do not say that on en:Wikipedia:Upload).
- Anyway I agree there is a risk but so we have no evidence that it is an Internet file. --MGA73 (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Badzil as no permission (no permission since).
This file and the other uploads from this user have a clear statement of "Own work". They have no EXIF which could indicate it is an Internet file. I checked this and all the other files on Google and found no hits. Except on facebook where the source is Wikipedia. So no proof that it is copyvios. MGA73 (talk) 20:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
The other files:
- File:Angban vs Zambie.jpg
- File:Angban à l'asec vainqueur.jpg
- File:Angban au Jeux.jpg
- File:Civ Nigeria.jpg
- File:Angban trophée.jpg
- File:Angban Vincent.jpg
- File:Angban Vincent de Paul.jpg
- File:Angban.jpg
--MGA73 (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete File:Civ Nigeria.jpg Appears on sulekha.com with an Associated Press watermark. Badzil (talk) 20:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete File:Angban au Jeux.jpg Picture taken at the 2008 Summer Olympics. This point of view is most likely only available to accredited photographs. The personal page of the uploader on WP:fr shows that he is not a professional photographer. And no EXIF and small resolution. Badzil (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Description of the picture File:Angban Vincent de Paul.jpg says that it has been taken during the en:2011 African Nations Championship. The logo on Angban's shirt shows a year starting with '200.' (unsure about the last digit). Badzil (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Vincent Angban stopped playing soccer in 2010. All these files show the date "3 October 2011". Badzil (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, per above I not trust the uploaders "own work".
- The filesize of File:Angban vs Guinée.jpg is 720px, thats the usual filesize for facebook thumbnails, I suspect its from facebook. At https://www.facebook.com/vincentdepaul.angban/photos you find some/all of the uploads with 720px filesize.
- File:Civ Nigeria.jpg is a professional photo with 610px size, thats the thumbnail size of daylife.com, a service publishing REUTERS, Getty and AP content for a limited time - indeed Civ_Nigeria.jpg is from the Associated Press, in their database under ID 080522060120. --Martin H. (talk) 21:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
No source, probably copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 22:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC) Give me a good reason to delete the coat of arms --Carloshistory (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC) -Bolivia
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
cause its a fake person 74.47.99.250 03:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
hes not real celebrity 74.47.99.250 03:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo russavia (talk) 05:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
cause its a fake person 74.47.99.250 03:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
hes not real celebrity 74.47.99.250 03:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo russavia (talk) 05:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 03:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 03:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmbassadorEmmanuel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
INeverCry 03:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parkoffice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising purpose, rights of photographs not clear.
- File:PARKOFFICE 011.jpg
- File:PARKOFFICE 142.jpg
- File:LogoPO.jpg
- File:Logo PARKOFFICE.jpg
- File:PARKOFFICE 085.jpg
- File:PARKOFFICE 218.jpg
- File:PARK OFFICE-006695.jpg
Funfood ␌ 09:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:21, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work - Small/middle size without EXIFs, other uploads were deleted
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heri 211297 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. INeverCry 18:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Likely to be collection of promo photos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, content taken from elsewhere, uploaded here with strange information {{PD-Art}} (author died 70 years ago) Martin H. (talk) 08:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
These images all have {{PD-URAA-Simul}}. One requirement for that template is that the files were published in the United States before 1 March 1989. However, all of these seem to have been created several decades after 1989, so they can impossibly have been published before 1989. Also, I've found earlier copies of some of the images outside Commons, e.g. [5] = File:Defqon.1luchtfoto.jpg.
- File:Q-BASE 2004.jpg
- File:Qlubtempo 2002.jpg
- File:Qlimax 2003 Thialf Heerenveen.jpg
- File:Qlimax DVD.jpg
- File:Q-dance op Tomorrowland.jpg
- File:The Qontinent.jpg
- File:Q-dance op Mysteryland.jpg
- File:Q-BASE.jpg
- File:Defqon.1eindshow.jpg
- File:Defqon.1luchtfoto.jpg
- File:Feestfabriek.jpg
- File:Qlimax.jpg
- File:QORE.jpg
- File:Q wiki.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Syria is not mentioned on COM:FOP Bulwersator (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- If only there were a tool for doing the research yourself before nominating things for deletion. It could search a worldwide database of internetworked computers. We could call it "The Internet". Perhaps the tool for searching could work on myriads, or Googols of webpages. Then you could update the FOP page, using the "edit" button at the top of the page, before citing something for deletion. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 18:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Although architectural drawings are copyrighted in Syria, architecture is not. Also, the period is only ten years. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
No known FoP in Syria. Was transferred to Commons from en.wiki despite warning. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination withdrawn. For some reason I recalled Syria being one of the countries that were not allowed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Isn't my closing comment above clear? Although architectural drawings have copyright, there is no copyright for architecture in Syria, see Article 3 of the Copyright law. Therefore, the lack of FOP is not a problem for architecture. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept Withdrawn by nom -- thanks, KoH. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence picture taken by uploader at festival (or that he would be allowed to do so). Bbb23 (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- I thought the same thing, but then I dug around and found this sachynmital.com, as well as this. And looking at the user name (Sachyn) of the person who uploaded them here, it seems plausible that the user is who he claims to be and indeed did take these pictures. Nymf (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Not sure how to comment as new to wikipedia, but image taken by Sachyn Mital and shared by Sachyn Mital (as user Sachyn). I don't know what more evidence you could want other than the image is mine and I uploaded it. See the links above or you can see my contributions to wikimedia here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Sachyn - Sachyn PS - Plus is it not innocent before proven guilty wherever you are from? I would suggest the onus is on you Bbb23 to show me why this image is in violation. #Simplyrude.
Kept: Actually, on Commons it is up to the uploader to prove that an image is free, not the other way around. With that said, I am willing to assume good faith here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sachyn as Speedy (I as the uploader no longer want to share this image.) Converted from a speedy to DR by me, as the above is not a speedy-rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Ok, deletion request can be DR and not speedy but I still want this deleted. I dislike the idea the burden of me proving the images are mine is on me. The previous discussion and comments have soured my opinion of sharing images. I'd like this particular image to be deleted straight away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachyn (talk • contribs) 03:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept The image is in use on 26 WPs, including at Topher Grace. The CC license is irrevocable.
As for your disagreement with our rules, please be reasonable. How can anyone else prove that the image is actually yours, except you? We normally assume good faith, but note that approximately 1/4 of all uploads are deleted -- that's more than 2,400 deletions per day, most of them uploaded by people who claim that the image was their own work. So please forgive us if our rules include a healthy dose of skepticism -- I think you will agree that we see so many bad actors that a level of skepticism is reasonable. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The film is a British film, directed by the en:Boulting brothers. If the work was published solely in the UK, the copyright label here will not apply. I do not believe we can retain the image without knowing publication history. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- From the description given, I cannot really tell if this was a photograph for promotional purposes during filming, or a scene released from the film; can someone explain that more clearly? The facts appear to be that we do not know if this image was published, where it was published and the photographer appears to be unknown/anonymous. If UK copyright applies, then this image would be copyright until 2040. --Fæ (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you look at similar photos, this looks like a film still-
- All have Columbia copyrights on the lower left and border. If you look at the original uploaded image and enlarge it, you see some numbers similar to those used for marking the other photos at lower left. The original upload is the way it was listed on eBay; it looks like either the seller or someone else cropped the photo, hence the remaining "-36" on Sellers' suit. HTH, We hope (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status FASTILY (TALK) 22:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
No license and no permission. Unless it is {{PD-ineligible}} but personally I think it is above COM:TOO. MGA73 (talk) 18:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion this logo is under the TOO. Fma12 (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Image goes far beyond PD-ineligible due to font; graphic device; and superposition of graphic device James F. (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Figurines dans le domaine public ou soumises au droit d'auteur ? Dereckson (talk) 10:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Je ne pense pas qu'il y est de problème pour ces figurines sans marque. En plus la qualité de la photo ne permet pas de bien distinguer... Kergourlay (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Cqui (talk) J'ai personnellement un gros doute, mais en voyant la Category:Santon (figurine), pourquoi pas en fait. --10:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ces figurines sont de [6], site qui les présente comme une fabrication artisanale originale. Je n'arrive pas à comprendre pourquoi les photos de poupées (Barbie entre autres) sont protégées, et interdites sur Commons , et pas les santons. --Barbetorte (talk) 10:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Je pense qu'il y a une différence entre une création totalement nouvelle comme Barbie et une traduction folklorique telle que les santons. Perso, je n'approuve pas la suppression des images de jouets avec un design moderne, mais la plupart des admins pensent le contraire. Yann (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- OK, ça se comprend. Mais dans le cas qui nous occupe on peut considérer qu'il y a une certaine créativité dans le dessin des figurines (dans le visage). Le plus simple à mon avis serait de demander au(x) créateur(s) d'envoyer des images CC BY SA, avec le nom du créateur propriétaire des droits. --Barbetorte (talk) 11:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Kergoulay ! tu viens de modifier ton post Je ne pense pas qu'il y est de problème pour ces figurines industrielles sans marque par Je ne pense pas qu'il y est de problème pour ces figurines sans marque. Ce n'est pas important, le fait qu'elles soient faites au moule ou pas, c'est l'originalité qui compte. Mais je ne pense pas qu'il y ait de problème si le créateur admet de voir figurer des photos de ses figurines sur Commons. Sinon, c'est à supprimer. --Barbetorte (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai vu sur le site que c'est artisanale et j'ai envoyé un message pour leur demander si ils autorisent la publication. Kergourlay (talk) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Un exemplaire unique est un critère important pour déterminer s'il y a un droit d'auteur ou pas. Yann (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Kergoulay ! tu viens de modifier ton post Je ne pense pas qu'il y est de problème pour ces figurines industrielles sans marque par Je ne pense pas qu'il y est de problème pour ces figurines sans marque. Ce n'est pas important, le fait qu'elles soient faites au moule ou pas, c'est l'originalité qui compte. Mais je ne pense pas qu'il y ait de problème si le créateur admet de voir figurer des photos de ses figurines sur Commons. Sinon, c'est à supprimer. --Barbetorte (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- OK, ça se comprend. Mais dans le cas qui nous occupe on peut considérer qu'il y a une certaine créativité dans le dessin des figurines (dans le visage). Le plus simple à mon avis serait de demander au(x) créateur(s) d'envoyer des images CC BY SA, avec le nom du créateur propriétaire des droits. --Barbetorte (talk) 11:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Je pense qu'il y a une différence entre une création totalement nouvelle comme Barbie et une traduction folklorique telle que les santons. Perso, je n'approuve pas la suppression des images de jouets avec un design moderne, mais la plupart des admins pensent le contraire. Yann (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 03:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
