Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/08/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Gogotte_Male.JPG){kind=link}
Low resolution photo without original exif. Doubtful authorship. Art-top (talk) 05:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Not an original work https://www.tineye.com/search/aaf35c690fbf6f217d35e1e82f93d21ec6ac6cf1/ please note the guidelines state you need to take a photo of a person at a public event or supply info that you have permission to re-use others' work. Hnapel (talk) 14:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
The source website, [1], has license CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0. Daniel Message 09:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploader request to delete (only had it up b/c needed for a brief IRC discussion); also doesn't have copyright information Purplebackpack89 (talk) 16:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
juejos olinpico 190.136.242.41 17:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense request. Martin H. (talk) 18:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
The image is of low resolution and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep Mistakenly nominated this. Image is in use. Withdraw nom. INeverCry 23:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Close as kept; nom withdrawn by nominator. In use user page image. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:36, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
This image allegedly depicts Oberleutnant Alois Brunner of the Austro-Hungarian army and it was taken in 1917. The source page [2] doesn't mention the name "Alois Brunner". The image is/was used throughout Wikipedia to illustrate the article on the SS officer Alois Brunner, born in 1912. Given this information, the usage of this image is incorrect. Disembodied Soul (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete the image, it's indeed possible to have two people with the same name ... Denniss (talk) 01:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
inproper licence and probably copyvio from here. Edgars2007 (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Xoptvio. Courcelles 22:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
copied from commercial homepage Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Георгий Гончаренко (talk) 08:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Не имеет значимости. http://commons.wikimedia - is not photohosting Agent001 (talk) 10:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Не имеет значимости. http://commons.wikimedia - is not photohosting Agent001 (talk) 10:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Не имеет значимости. http://commons.wikimedia - is not photohosting Agent001 (talk) 10:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Не имеет значимости. http://commons.wikimedia - is not photohosting Agent001 (talk) 10:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
unused image without description or descriptive name Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Orphan personal pic, only contribution by user not active since November. -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
quality too bad; also it looks like a screenshot Isderion (talk) 00:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph.Érico Wouters msg 22:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph.Érico Wouters msg 22:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photograph.Érico Wouters msg 22:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
out of scope; copyrighted Isderion (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Uploaded that picture to use in my article Sanki King, whats wrong with that? SameStruggle (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Are you Sanki King?
- The image contains advertisement for webpages which is annoying. --Isderion (talk) 01:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
That is the actual picture of the sticker, in the real sticker, the links are printed in the bottom, if you want pictures of the real sticker I can give you several links right now, if the web links was an issue couldnt you just ask me to remove the links and then upload the picture? Was it necessary to propose it for deletion without talking to me? I would gladly let you guys delete it but you did not say a word to me about the sticker you just proposed it for deletion within 1 minute of the time when I uploaded it, before I could even go to Edit the picture and enter the category you posted the propose for deletion thing. Very immature and careless. SameStruggle (talk) 23:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Propose any of my pictures for deletion if they are inappropriate but its always polite to highlight the issue to the user. SameStruggle (talk) 23:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
This picture is currently being used here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanki_King with a reliable/verifiable citation. SameStruggle (talk) 23:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
You are right, I could have done a better jobs in explaining what the exact problem is. As the sticker is designed by Sanki King and published elsewhere as you suggest we need the permission of Sanki King to use it. Please get a written permission (also possible via email with an email-adress that undisputable belongs to him) from him and forward it to the OTRS as described in Commons:Permission. --Isderion (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission. See COM:OTRS FASTILY (TALK) 08:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 00:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 01:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 01:02, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 01:02, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Ryan Vesey Review me! 02:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Wrong license. Sreejith K (talk) 01:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Obvious professional studio portrait. Claims permission from "Carlos Montero email relinquishing copyright" but no such email has been filed with OTRS. User has history of copyvio uploads at English Wikipedia. Dcoetzee (talk) 03:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. INeverCry 19:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Flag of Tamil Eelam.svg Fry1989 eh? 03:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 04:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The license terms given here are not at all free, and for instance do not allow commercial re-use. Not a suitable license for uploads here. Lymantria (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: PDF file which contains text for an wikipedia article. Also, I doubt the such text is upload with permission. Mys 721tx (talk) 06:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: simple pattern which no project uses. Mys 721tx (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
a logo of a company trying to make self-promotion. Zhxy 519 (talk) 07:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Out of scope. Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. INeverCry 19:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Fue utilizado solo para efectos de prueba. Disculpas por la novatada, no estoy muy ducho todavía en la dinamica de subida de nuevas versiones de archivos Sparkve (talk) 09:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Raffig Tullou (1909-1990), not in public domain. No FOP in France. 90.2.102.182 09:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
I have entered wrong information about the picture by mistake. D.andonov (talk) 09:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
blurry, better images available (see Tamarindus indica) Thiotrix (talk) 10:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The painter is living and there is no evidence that he has given permission for use of his work here. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The artist is living and there is no evidence that he has given permission for use of his work here. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
blurry, better images available Thiotrix (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
copy right protected Saleem100 (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, irrelevant subject. See also Emmanuel Ijumi. Trijnsteltalk 12:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. INeverCry 19:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The only file left from a prolific uploader of copyrighted media, see Special:DeletedContributions/Chrispilot2293 and User talk:Chrispilot2293. This one's most likely not free either. Trijnsteltalk 12:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Blown up pixels; just a doodle to make a point; unused and unusable in main name space; pertains only to a closed discussion. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. INeverCry 19:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
According to this page, the Table Bay Hotel was constructed in 1996 or early 1997. South African copyright is 50 years pma, so this can safely be assumed copyrighted until at least 1/1/2047. South Africa does not have freedom of panorama suitable for Commons, so this is an unauthorized derivative of a copyrighted work. cmadler (talk) 12:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Is extracted from the web www.lgars.com already disappeared. No OTRS mention. Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 
14:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This statue recognizes South Africa's four Nobel Peace Prize laureates. Since Mandela and de Klerk won in 1993, these statues were probably created since then. South Africa's copyright term is 50 years pma, so these will probably be under copyright until at least 1/1/2044. South Africa does not have adequate freedom of panorama for Commons, so this is an unauthorized derivative of a copyrighted work. cmadler (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Likely to just scan/photo of diploma created by 3rd party. Text may be not copyrighted, by graphical design may. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Modern monument. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
According to this page, this waterfront shopping complex was constructed in several stages from 1992 through 2006. There's not enough information there to tell for certain which stage this was, but even if it was the first one, the architecture is still copyrighted (South Africa is 50 years pma, so if the architect died in 1992, it will expire 1/1/2043). South Africa does not have freedom of panorama for Commons purposes. cmadler (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Conserver: Cette image représente un paysage portuaire dont le bâtiment visé n'est qu'un élément. "Freedom of panorama" does not make haram any image with something copyrighted on it. --Wuyouyuan (talk) 13:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Both buildings of the Civic Centre were built in 1978. South African copyright is 50 years pma, so these will remain copyrighted until at least 1/1/2029 (if the architect died the year of construction). South Africa has no freedom of panorama. cmadler (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
blurry, unidentifiable Thiotrix (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The displayed information is copyrightable in common law countries, namely India. This does not fall under India's freedom of panorama clause, because it is a 2D work; besides, the information is changing on the board anyway. In short, the displays on the bottom and the information displays on the top are both copyrightable and this is a derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Common Good (talk) 17:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- How is this not Derivative work? It's clearly a poster designed by the local police that is used to advertise traffic safety. Advertisements don't fall under FOP. --Vera (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The present image is a cpvio of the conference/event poster in the background which is a 2D work. Perhaps we can do with cropping but the image is unused at any rate, and is, therefore, perhaps out of scope. In addition, it needs to be rotated and moved to a more descriptive filename. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE; unfocussed shot, non-notable. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted. Useless. --Dschwen (talk) 23:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 17:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work
Speedy not appropiate. FOP might apply. -- Common Good (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work
Speedy not appropiate. FOP might apply. -- Common Good (talk) 18:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
unused user photo, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Last image can be found on Panoramio, licensed with unaccepteable CC license http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18139357 Smooth_O (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Recent work of art which may not be covered by FOP exemption, as the original work seems to be installed inside a building. --Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Same problem with:
--Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 18:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 18:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 18:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. INeverCry 19:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 22:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 18:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 18:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 18:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused image, very bad quality, no description Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
No encyclopedic use. Uploaded by hoaxer for use in deleted hoax articles on en:wp about a non-existent "Prince" Charles Henrik Andre Lamar Wellington or Wellesley, variously claimed to be second in line to the throne, grandson of the Duke of Wellington, eldest son of the Archduke of Austria-Este etc. JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, out of scope Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This file, as well as File:Hg 2.jpeg, is most probably a blatant hoax: who ever heard about this Leopold Gustave, or about Louis Philippe Cachin? See also deleted French article on fr:Urine de cheval. Azurfrog (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake: I wanted to have the file deleted, not the talk page. --Azurfrog (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This file, as well as File:Hg 2.jpeg and File:Hg 3.jpeg of the same author, is most probably a blatant hoax (see deleted article on the French Wikikpedia, fr:Urine de cheval): who ever heard about this Leopold Gustave, or about Louis Philippe Cachin anyway? Moreover, this file (Hg 1) has also been copied without proper authorisation from http://trouvephoto.com/. Reading the first paragraph of this website clearly shows that it is not compatible with the Wikipedia licence. Azurfrog (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake: I wanted to have the file deleted, not the talk page. --Azurfrog (talk) 19:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hoax: This file is obviously clipped - under a false title - from the 1885 portrait of Louis Pasteur by Albert Edelfelt, which, together with other files from the same contributor, has been used to illustrate a blatant hoax on the French Wikipedia, namely fr:Urine de cheval. Azurfrog (talk) 19:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This file, as well as File:Hg 2.jpeg, is a blatant hoax, used on the French Wikipedia to illustrate fr:Urine de cheval: who ever heard about this Leopold Gustave, or about Louis Philippe Cachin anyway? Azurfrog (talk) 19:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This file, as well as File:Hg 2.jpeg and File:Hg 3.jpeg of the same author, is most probably a blatant hoax (see deleted article on the French Wikikpedia, fr:Urine de cheval): who ever heard about this Leopold Gustave, or about Louis Philippe Cachin anyway? Moreover, this file (Hg 1) has also been copied without proper authorisation from http://trouvephoto.com/. Reading the first paragraph of this website clearly shows that it is not compatible with the Wikipedia licence. Azurfrog (talk) 19:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Shrihanimations1.jpg
- File:Shrihanimations2.jpg
- File:Shrihanimations3.jpg
- File:Shrihanimations4.jpg
- File:Shrihanimations5.jpg
- File:Shrihanimations6.jpg
- File:Shrihanimations7.jpg
These images were uploaded solely for an advertisement of a non-notable company and are therefore out of scope and should be deleted per COM:SCOPE. PCock (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
wrong name. this picture will be reuploaded with a proper name tetraktys (talk) 20:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
wrong name. this file will be reuploaded with a proper name tetraktys (talk) 20:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
wrong name. this file will be reuploaded with a proper name tetraktys (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculptures by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
_Gogotte_Male.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Gogotte_Male.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
_Gogotte_Male.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
_Gogotte_Male.JPG){kind=link}
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Philolaos, dead in 2010. Not in public domain, no freedom of panorama in France. OxIxO (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Google logo is cropped out of this photo, but see this link. It appears like Wikimapia uses google maps, which would make this a derivative work. Ryan Vesey Review me! 20:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The magazine cover is not under a free license and it cannot be treated as De minimis Sreejith K (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Abhishek Kapoor, Shazahn Padamsee, Shailendra Singh, Sophie Choudryat DJ magazine launch 02.jpg
[edit]
The magazine cover is copyrighted at it does not come under De minimis Sreejith K (talk) 21:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the Philippines, see COM:FOP#Philippines Ronhjones (Talk) 21:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
copyright violation Reality 21:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
The watermark in the bottom right corner of the image indicates this file is not the uploader's work, and was taken from www.coins-spb.ru. Aamsse talk to me 22:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused file. Out of scope. INeverCry 22:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 22:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 22:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
spam, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 22:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 22:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 22:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
No indication of notability of subject - out of scope. Also appears to be a professional portrait lacking permission. INeverCry 22:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 22:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional image. INeverCry 22:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused, rights of used photographs unclear and out of COM:PS. Funfood ␌ 23:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Érico Wouters msg 23:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional. INeverCry 23:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Promotional. INeverCry 23:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. INeverCry 23:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture and photo are property of sculptor James Croak. The link [3] is offered as proof this photo is in the public domain, but depicts a different photograph of the sculpture. Dcoetzee (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
![[3]](http://www.jamescroak.com/html/images/dirtbaby_2b.jpg){kind=link}
- It's exactly the same photo. If you take the web photo and re-size by around 125% and rotate 90° CCW, one can perfectly superimpose them in PhotoShop. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake! Dcoetzee (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Ronhjones was clear enough about it. Fma12 (talk) 03:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nikbot as no license (no license) Yann (talk) 18:41, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- PD-textlogo? It may be borderline. Let's discuss. Yann (talk) 18:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept. I can't see anything which would be any potential copyright violation. The only part of the logo which isn't simple text is the little "bone" shaped design, and since that symbol for a bone goes back centuries (example File:ENG COA Newton.svg from 18th century) it too is PD. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Still from a television program. Probably unfree. Trijnsteltalk 12:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know if it is simple enough to be PD-textlogo, but the copyright status does not depend of the source of the logo. Yann (talk) 13:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I didn't notice the previous request, but imho it's not PD-textlogo. And as all the other uploads are deleted, I vote for Delete. Trijnsteltalk 15:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- DRs are not contest, and votes do not count. The fact that other files were deleted is irrelevant. Do you have any information why it would not be PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 05:10, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because of this and the fact that the lettertype and file is used for all marketing stuff. Besides, those title cards/still are usually not free. Trijnsteltalk 13:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- All this is irrelevant for determining the copyright status of this file. What would be useful is a court case or an opinion from a legal expert, about a similar logo. Yann (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- None of that matters. If a user drew this and uploaded it without it being used for anything, it would be just as copyrightable (or not) as one in wide use as a trademark. Commercial value has no effect on a work's copyrightability in the U.S. (nor does visual appeal for that matter). Typeface is also not copyrightable, even if custom. However... the 3-D effects may push things over the line (I've not seen a Copyright Office registration refusal which does contain a 3-D effect at least). The dog bone is pretty stock; maybe its placement may matter a little, but sort of doubt it. Not completely sure... don't think the bone adds much in the way of copyrightability in this case, but I may lean delete based on the 3-D effect, as basic as it seems, as there are non-typeface effects involved there. But I think that would be the only thing which has a chance of making it copyrightable. It's borderline for sure. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because the "3-D effects" are merely a subtle drop shadow on the lettering (note that it's not applied to the bone), I see that as on par with italicizing text; it's still just part of typeface. cmadler (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- It can involve elements like how deep, how much perspective, etc. which aren't really part of the typeface. I'm not really sure to be honest; it's just that in all the appeals decisions posted online where logos were involved, I don't remember any which had 3D effects, which makes me a bit suspicious. Granted, this is a very simple effect, so maybe this one wouldn't qualify. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because the "3-D effects" are merely a subtle drop shadow on the lettering (note that it's not applied to the bone), I see that as on par with italicizing text; it's still just part of typeface. cmadler (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Because of this and the fact that the lettertype and file is used for all marketing stuff. Besides, those title cards/still are usually not free. Trijnsteltalk 13:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- DRs are not contest, and votes do not count. The fact that other files were deleted is irrelevant. Do you have any information why it would not be PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 05:10, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry, I didn't notice the previous request, but imho it's not PD-textlogo. And as all the other uploads are deleted, I vote for
- Keep The font itself is not copyrightable in the US, which is the country of origin. There is not enough text to be copyrightable as text. The bone is not copyrightable, because "copyright does not protect familiar shapes, or mere variations in size and color" ([4]). Looking at the image as a whole, there is simple text aligned flush left, and the familiar bone shape. When I compare it to works known to be uncopyrightable, such as File:Best Western logo.svg and File:Nikken Logo.jpg, I think this pretty clearly fails to meet the US originality requirement. cmadler (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept as per Carl L. and Cmadler. Yann (talk) 13:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Master Chief Images
[edit]- File:Halo3LaunchInNYC ShaneKim MasterChief.jpg
- File:Halo3LaunchInTaiwan Brock MasterChief.jpg
- File:Kevin Hickman - Master Chief - Halo.jpg
- File:Master Chief at Dragon Con 2005.jpg
- File:Master Chief Halo cosplay.jpg
- File:SXSW 2009 Master Chief cosplay.jpg
Copyvio --Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete As derivative works. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Image_casebook#Costumes_and_cosplay. Rd232 (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:David Tar
[edit]- File:Sturnus roseus kumisi.jpg
- File:Pelobates rana tadpoles.jpg
- File:Chestnut forest.jpg
- File:Rana macrocnemis camerani.jpg
- File:Rana macrocnemis1.jpg
- File:Pelodytes caucasicus.jpg
- File:Male protuberance in Mertensiella.jpg
- File:Mertensiella caucasica.jpg
All images are from copyrighted website, and with no permission. --Smooth_O (talk) 09:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:45, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Likely to be collection of promo/fan images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This DR includes 11 images by a single purpose account, this is all their uploads apart from File:PCity.png which seems copyright ineligible. The others lack EXIF data and fail the precautionary principle after I find the image File:-pop.jpg in an original uncropped version with its background un-masked at http://www.herrenausstatter.de/pimages/24/24073_norm.jpg. The images are all professional standard "web quality" images that you would expect to find in a men's underwear catalogue. Consequently the CC-BY-SA as "own work" by an anonymous account is not credible.
As the example file has been touched up by masking the background as well as cropping, simple Google image searches are far less likely to turn up the original sources.
- File:Slipverde.jpg
- File:Sliptrasero.jpg
- File:Sliprojo.jpg
- File:Sliplateral.jpg
- File:Slipdelante.jpg
- File:-pop.jpg
- File:Boxtrasero.jpg
- File:Boxertrans.jpg
- File:Boxerslipwhite.jpg
- File:Boxergray.jpg
- File:Miniboxerblanco.jpg
Fæ (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only files.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only files.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AC Sparta Praha cycling (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of team photos/advertisement. No evidence of permission.
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 40.JPG
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 39.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 38.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 36.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 37.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling -5-.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling -6-.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling -4-.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling -3-.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling -2-.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling -1-.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 35.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 34.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 33.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 32.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 31.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 30.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 29.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 28.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 27.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 26.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 25.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 24.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 22.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 23.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 21.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 10.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 20.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 18.jpg
- File:AC Sparta Praha Cycling 17.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is no FoP in South Africa. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.62.200.57 12:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- This is only an interpretation - and an unnecessarily severe one. Even Freedom_of_panorama#South_Africa says "However, since it does not adequately mention photographs, it is unknown if photographs of artistic works are an infringement or not." If images of buildings were not allowed, this would certainly have been enforced in South Africa during the 2010 FIFA World Cup, when restrictions of this sort were enforced more strictly than usual, but it wasn't. Zaian (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: - "it is unknown if photographs of artistic works are an infringement or not" - Jcb (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Stadium was constructed in 1972, so based on South Africa's 50 years pma copyright term, is under copyright until at least 1/1/2023. South Africa does not have freedom of panorama adequate for Commons (this appears to have been clarified since the prior deletion discussion), so photographs of copyrighted buildings are not allowed. cmadler (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 07:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cbmacademy (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of scope
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DarynaGonzalez (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of scope
- File:Daryna Gonzalez 3 años.jpg
- File:Daryna Natalia Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Daryna Natalia Gonzalez Saavedra.jpg
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mei Wilshire (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of scope
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
unused user images, out of scope
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ValentinaShee (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of scope
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Dorothy Apartments (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is no personal free web host, out of scope
- File:The Dorothy Font.jpg
- File:The Dorothy.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 10.jpg
- File:The Dorothy Front.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 6.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 8.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 9.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 7.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 5.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 4.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 1.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 3.jpg
- File:One Bedroom 2.jpg
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 18:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anoopjacob (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of scope
- File:Anoop jacob 5.JPG
- File:Anoop jacob 7.JPG
- File:Anoop jacob 4.jpg
- File:Anoop jacob 3.jpg
- File:Anoop jacob 1.jpg
- File:Anoop jacob 2.jpg
- File:Anoop jacob.jpg
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lorenzokame (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused user images, out of scope
- File:Dbrdfsleep2.JPG
- File:Dbrdftrash.JPG
- File:Dbrdfsleep.JPG
- File:Dbrdfsleep3.JPG
- File:Dbrdfritratto.jpg
- File:Dbrdfpanza.JPG
- File:Dbrdffront.jpg
- File:Dbrdfmacchina.JPG
Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:1g andorra gold.jpg
Unused diagram parts (?) and out of COM:PS.
Funfood ␌ 22:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused image of an unidentified person - out of scope. Deletion also requested by supposed subject of the picture via OTRS 2012080510003941 QU TalkQu 11:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Looks like German singer Claudia Cane to me: official website. Plenty of google hits, youtube, etc. This is a pic of a notable musician/singer and is in scope. INeverCry 19:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Could you ask her submitting a photo to OTRS as a replacement? Thank you. -- Rillke(q?) 18:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes it could be nice to ask her a better picture ( OTRS ticket 2012080510003941 ) Otourly (talk) 19:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 03:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Poorly photographed own penis snapshot, far inferior in illustrative quality to many other images on Commons. Only use is on user subpage of user with no contributions to Commons since 2009. Infrogmation (talk) 18:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Seems like a unique angle, and isn't that low quality. Being unused is not a reason for deletion. Handcuffed (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- By "unique angle", I assume you mean the angle from which the photographer photographed his genitalia? If you take a couple minutes to look through Category:Human scrotum, Category:Human testicles, Category:Human penis, Category:Male human genitalia, and their numerous subcategories, I believe you will find dozens photographed from very similar viewpoints. Agree the quality is not abysmally dreadful, it is merely poor-- bad lighting, decided yellow cast, mediocre focus. The more common the subject, the less excuse there is for poor image quality. Human male genitalia is an extremely common object of which Commons has an unusual wealth of images. If you can state any particular aspect of human male genitalia illustrated by this image which Commons does not have multiple other images of, at least a couple being of superior photographic quality, I will withdraw this nomination. -- Infrogmation (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete "Unique angle" is not an argument - similar to unique date or unique file name. Peer Infrogmation: COM:PORN. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, different and specific illustrative nature of anatomical venous structure as well as pigmentation of capillary formation. -- Cirt (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No Consensus to delete FASTILY (TALK) 03:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Low quality unused penis image Dronebogus (talk) 14:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Юрий Д.К 14:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Files of User:BNKR wiki
[edit]I nominated some images of BNKR wiki (talk · contribs) as copyrighted, but as i can see, almost all (or all) images of this user are taken from various copyrighted sites. --Smooth_O (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)