Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/03/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_Page_1.jpg){kind=link}
![71 File:"Love of Millions".jpg](#File:"Love_of_Millions".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
![126 File:Chalk drawing "Bush talk to Europe".jpg](#File:Chalk_drawing_"Bush_talk_to_Europe".jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
This image is mis-labeled. It is not "Brittany Women" by Émile Friant, but "Arrivée du pardon de sainte Anne à Concarneau" by Alfred Guillou (his signature is clear in the lower right-hand corner). It is in the collection of the Musée d'Orsay. Innisart (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment Big thanks to you for clearing out this mess. However, there is no need to delete the picture, it's possible to simply rename it. I've already requested renaming. Trycatch (talk) 03:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Non-admin, non-controversial closure. Moved the file as requested. Materialscientist (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
copyvio (not public domain) McZusatz (talk) 08:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by ALE! Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
dont want it on computer 212.129.76.130 12:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: disruptive/Troll DR Denniss (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
crop of this copyright protected computer graphic, as mantioned here Vera (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation of a computer generated architectural design. Sreejith K (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
copyright violation as of this computer generated image + some color adjustment. Vera (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation of a computer generated architectural design. Sreejith K (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Zscout370 as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.medals.pl/yu/yu3.htm Sreejith K (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 16:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Zscout370 as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.coleccionesmilitares.com/cintas/europa/yugoslaviak.gif Sreejith K (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 16:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Zscout370 as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.coleccionesmilitares.com/cintas/europa/yugoslaviak.gif Sreejith K (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 16:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Zscout370 as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.coleccionesmilitares.com/cintas/europa/yugoslaviak.gif Sreejith K (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 16:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Zscout370 as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.coleccionesmilitares.com/cintas/europa/yugoslaviak.gif Sreejith K (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 16:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Zscout370 as Copyvio for the following reason: http://www.medals.pl/yu/yu2.htm Sreejith K (talk) 06:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 16:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Most likely copyright violation: http://bayern.verdi.de/wir_ueber_uns/landesbezirksleitung/luise_klemens See also "Foto Ralf Kruse" in Meta. Liesbeth Lass (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Alle Rechte an dem Foto, ausdrücklich auch zur Veröffentlichung im Internet, hat ver.di Bayern vom Fotografen Ralf Kruse erworben. Das identische Bild findet sich deshalb auch auf der Webseite von ver.di Bayern (http://bayern.verdi.de/wir_ueber_uns/landesbezirksleitung) --Hsterr (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Ich habe die schriftliche Freigabe aller Nutzungsrechte des Fotografen für dieses Bild, finde aber keine Möglichkeit, sie hier irgendwo als Nachweis hochzuladen. Wie macht man das? --Hsterr (talk) 11:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received, see file description page. →Nagy 17:21, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Unuseful redirect ; I am the author of both pictures ; please suppress this one Tangopaso (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
_Page_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Page_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no information about logo, no educational use possible. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
_Page_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
_Page_1.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 06:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope test file, incorrect relicensing of copyrighted logo. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, test upload George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of uploader, out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 05:53, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Delete grabbed from http://armandolopezcampa.com/trayectoria/ = http://armandolopezcampa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Trayectoria.jpg (last modified: 2012).Gunnex (talk) 23:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Uploader wish deletion (see [1] ). Unused private image. GeorgHH • talk 09:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ASooraj_in_2010.jpg&diff=67921132&oldid=49873530){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
no educational value Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 18:44, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete agree--Vera (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
The coin is not "de minimis" in this image. (Images of the coin are not accepted on Commons per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Euro coin common face 2.) -- Asclepias (talk) 22:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- The coin is not really needed in this picture (and might be removed), because it's not about size. --Leyo 22:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- If it is possible to make a good version without the coin, that would be good, then only this version with the coin needs to be deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Coin is removed.--Hic et nunc (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- If it is possible to make a good version without the coin, that would be good, then only this version with the coin needs to be deleted. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept the current version because the coin has now been removed. Older revision deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 12:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
blurred, low resoultion text. Possible copyvio, but certainly violates our rule against keeping material that can easily be typeset. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Personal artwork, no educational value, out of scope. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio, see https://www.google.ro/search?hl=ro&q=trollface+gif&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSVRpTCxCo1NgEGgIICgwLELCMpwgaLAoqCAESBPUH_1wcaIOxYm2n2f3uYbVhfAkN6cMfrs8A8R3aIuvVmYCbIBb2GDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEbo_1cSQw&sa=X&ei=STJhT7XvBcTOtAbntOG7CQ&ved=0CCMQ2A4oAA&biw=1360&bih=667 Ionutzmovie (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, copyvio Mys 721tx (talk) 00:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Probably false authorship claims. Found at http://vox.hautetfort.com/archive/2004/11/11/un_lievre_cornu_-_le.html years before it was uploaded here. —LX (talk, contribs) 01:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gangsterphobic.jpg: lacking proof of authorship Mys 721tx (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Published on 1966-1969, < 50 years, not PD shizhao (talk) 02:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lin-Mao 1.jpg: not in public domain yet. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. All images uploaded by User:Wolfgang.B were taken from other websites, and there is no proof for {{Own work}}.
- File:Antioch EskiVilla.jpg
- File:Antioch TarihiSokak.jpg
- File:Antioch TarihiSokak2.jpg
- File:Antioch TarihiSokak3.jpg
- File:AntiochK Katolik.jpg
- File:AntiochK Katolik2.jpg
- File:AntiochK Ortodox.jpg
- File:Antioch ProtestanKilisesi.jpg
- File:Antioch Meclis.jpg
- File:Antioch Müze.jpg
- File:Antioch Mozaik.jpg
- File:Antioch KlasikCadde.jpg
- File:Antioch Universite.jpg
- File:Antioch Tyche.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antioch EskiVilla.jpg: no proof for Own work Mys 721tx (talk) 00:13, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I mistakenly called it yellow spotted Eel, while it's a Myrichthys ocellatus (gold spotted Eel) Firedrop (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: A bad name is never a reason to delete. Please use {{Rename}}. Deleting and reloading under a different name simply wastes time and resources. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
copyvio http://ilamp.com.ar/images/E-14-led-lamp.jpg McZusatz (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by High Contrast Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Again you didn't bother to google the depicted person. Some French director -- http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2317858/ . Important enough for Commons. Trycatch (talk) 13:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep There was a clear description; this kind of DR's chases contributors away from Commons. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per comment above Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
The subject appears only in silhouette and almost detail is visible. Wikimedia has better images of the same subject. Motacilla (talk) 12:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not seeing a silhouette, and I don't think this image is so irretrievably bad that it should be considered out of scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per Rodhullandemu. Trycatch (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per comment above Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
The subject appears only in silhouette and almost detail is visible. Wikimedia has better images of the same subject. Motacilla (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not seeing a silhouette, and I don't think this image is so irretrievably bad that it should be considered out of scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
wrong image Velo Vrbata (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request of unused file Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, Ezarateesteban 19:44, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't know where it comes from but I suspect a copyvio. Here, there is a photo with higher resolution and a part of the picture. I think it should be deleted. - Zil (d) 20:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Here, there is another version with higher resolution that the version we've got on commons. - Zil (d) 20:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as well as other uploads by Thawalib (talk · contribs). Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
If "created for an internal company presentation," the copyright is presumably held by the company. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: Regardless of whether or not the file is suited on Commons or not, we have received permission. Ticket:2012031410009982. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Already confirmed by OTRS Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Personal art, out of scope. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Photo of an advertisment Cambalachero (talk) 02:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Photo of a poster presumably still under copyright Jafeluv (talk) 11:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
probably a copy vio from a website, given the size and quality. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio from [2]. Jafeluv (talk) 11:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
This is a logo of a university in Indonesia, so it cannot be a government work as perscribed by this license. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free logo. Jafeluv (talk) 11:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
WTF? The photo has a description. In two languages. Did you bother to read it? w:es:Gabriel Agraz García de Alba, a notable writer. Trycatch (talk) 14:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - obviously. This kind of nominations just chases contributors away. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep (I don't know how to include the keep image) --Janwikifoto (talk) 19:55, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Notable person, image no longer unused. Jafeluv (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Non-free logo. Kobac (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete --Vera (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free logo. Jafeluv (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
who's that girl, no metadata, own work? Ezarateesteban 19:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
who's that girl, no metadata, own work? Ezarateesteban 19:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
who's that girl, no metadata, own work? Ezarateesteban 19:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission of the author was not provided High Contrast (talk) 08:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
one of the source images was deleted, it needs to be replaced or this compilation will be deleted. Denniss (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No changes have been made to remove the copyvio from the image, so delete russavia (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Files of User:Elfamanosetoca
[edit]
They seem personal photos and out of the project's scope. Facha can also be considered an attack. -Savhñ 21:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos ribas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private stuff for a kids group / church project. No educational use possible. Couldn't find evidence that this project ever existed using those images.
- File:Ccr.aguia.JPG
- File:Jesus ccr cruz e tanque.JPG
- File:Simbolo aleatorio resgate.jpg
- File:Vamos onde precisar 2.jpg
- File:Resgate Kids (projeto 3).jpg
- File:Resgate Kids (projeto 2).jpg
- File:Resgate Kids (projeto 1).jpg
- File:Vamos onde precisar comunidade crista resgate.jpg
- File:Operação resgate omunidade cristã resgate.jpg
- File:Comunidade Cristã Resgate.jpg
- File:Resgate kids comunidade crista resgate.jpg
- File:Forças Especias.jpg
- File:Combate.jpg
- File:Projeto.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 18:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope --Vera (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Non descript, low quality, no explanation, location, nothing whatsoever. Not usable at all on commons.
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 18:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete also, terrible choice of format --Vera (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Angola
[edit]See COM:CUR#Angola.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Portuguese Angola
[edit]See COM:CUR#Angola: they don't look very old.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Coins of Australia
[edit]See COM:CUR#Australia: coins made since 1 May 1969 are 
Not OK.
- File:AU $1 CHOGM2011.jpg
- File:AU 20c 2011 IWD.jpg
- File:AU 20c IYV+10.jpg
- File:Sixteen Australian dollar coins.jpg (added later by Gumruch)
Stefan4 (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 15:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:CUR#Australia Sreejith K (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patelpintu007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal pictures.
- File:Me at new taj hotel in mumbai.jpg
- File:Me and my friends at baroda.jpg
- File:Me and my friends in mumbai in boating.jpg
- File:Me and my friends at taj hotel.jpg
- File:This is my photo..jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by INFO.MUSIC (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:INFOMUSIC2012.gif
- File:INFO.MUSIC 2012.jpg
- File:INFO.MUSIC2012.jpg
- File:INFO.MUSIC2012.gif
- File:INFO.MUSIC2011.PNG
- File:INFO.MUSIC 2011.gif
- File:INFO.MUSIC2010.png
- File:INFO.MUSIC 2010.JPG
- File:INFO.MUSIC2009.gif
- File:Bannière Info.Music.gif
Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Toxic_Sickness (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Copy of 387928 10150620194285830 788005829 11855400 1669592331 n.jpg
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-PNG-TRANSPARENT-black-n-pink-500pix (2).jpg
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-PNG-TRANSPARENT-BLACK-TURQOISE-500PIX.jpg
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-PNG-TRANSPARENT-RED-AND-YELLOW-500PIX (1).jpg
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-GOLD-700PIX.png
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-RED-700PIX.png
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-GOLD-AND-BLACK-BACK-700PIX.jpg
- File:TOXIC-SICKNESS-LOGO-WITH-SITE-ADDY-PNG-TRANSPARENT-BLACK-AND-RED-500PIX (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
no information about logo, no educational use possible.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
one of the images (parque Moinhos de Vento) was found here [3], and the skyline is a crop of this one (vista do Lago Guaíba). possibly the uploader is not the author. besides, many other images uploaded by him were deleted for copyvio (see: User talk:Pedro gabriel viero). after his usual behavior i think it's highly probable this one too is copyvio. the other images are on Commons but were not credited. tetraktys (talk) 17:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
the skyline is a crop of Vista do Lago Guaíba. the uploader, Pedro Gariel Viero uploaded many images copyrighted. (see: User talk:Pedro gabriel viero), and this is his usual behavior). the other images are derivative from Commons pictures but were not credited. tetraktys (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
the wind mill was found here, Usina do Gaômetro was found here, and the skyline is a crop of Vista do Lago Guaíba. the uploader, Pedro Gariel Viero uploaded many images copyrighted. (see: User talk:Pedro gabriel viero). other images are derivative from Commons pictures but they were not credited. tetraktys (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
the wind mill was found here and the skyline is a crop of Vista do Lago Guaíba. the uploader, Pedro Gariel Viero uploaded many images copyrighted. (see: User talk:Pedro gabriel viero). other images are derivative from Commons pictures but they were not credited. tetraktys (talk) 18:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Sourced to a dead link on Facebook. Stefan4 (talk) 22:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Ytoyoda as Copyvio for the following reason: The Flickr account is just a guy who photographs other people's photographs. This particular one is an iconic photo shot by Walter Ioos: http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0808/iooss-bp.html Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio shizhao (talk) 01:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope & dubious copyright status. Stefan4 (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Note that there is also a discussion on the talk page. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
COM:DW of a sculpture (and {{Personality rights}} does not apply). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- The {{personality rights}} are there because I uploaded pictures of this event in a batch of 200+ images, most of which included people. They themselves have published a very nice picture of the trophy under CC-BY-SA. --Vera (talk) 23:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- These images are pictures of a bronze sculpture, which although used as an award, still could/should be considered a work of art. It seems to me extra permission of the artist is required. Now you are right about that there is a very nice picture on flickr, but that doesn't give you the permission for your pictures. -- Mdd (talk) 02:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- The copyright holder of the statue is then perhaps willing to grant a similar permission for these photos through OTRS. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- We can only assume the copyright holder of the sculpture has granted permission for the publication of that Flickr picture under CC-BY-SA. There is no prove of that. It is only my experience that with such a prestigious prize, sculptures are made by artists with some name. I think we should track down the artist, and let the artist decide. I have given this a try myself looking for that artist online, but was unsuccessful. I guess contacting the TEDx Amsterdam organization should be an option here, if Vera wants to keep these images here. -- Mdd (talk) 23:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, yes I will try and contact the TEDxAmsterdam organisation --Vera (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Got word back from the organisation. The guy responsible for the award had re-purposed an award he had gotten himself over 10 years ago for the TEDxAmsterdam award, adding a layer of gold foil and the logo to it (oh, how Dutch). So now we have multiple layers of derivative work. We've got the the original creator of the statue, which might be hard to track down now, and the TEDxAmsterdam guy. Is it enough to let him agree with publication? --Vera (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- ROTFL. But he does not own the copyright. The images should be deleted. But thank you very much for the story. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Got word back from the organisation. The guy responsible for the award had re-purposed an award he had gotten himself over 10 years ago for the TEDxAmsterdam award, adding a layer of gold foil and the logo to it (oh, how Dutch). So now we have multiple layers of derivative work. We've got the the original creator of the statue, which might be hard to track down now, and the TEDxAmsterdam guy. Is it enough to let him agree with publication? --Vera (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, yes I will try and contact the TEDxAmsterdam organisation --Vera (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- @Vera, if that guy is willing to cooperate, you could ask him where he got the award and you can further investigate. It's not just a funny story. It is also a good example of recycling, which is a hot item in art nowadays. I agree with Pieter, so far, that we should stay on the save side. If we cannot find the artist, or cannot get his permission these images should be removed. -- Mdd (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- e-mailed him asking where he got the award. --Vera (talk) 23:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- We can only assume the copyright holder of the sculpture has granted permission for the publication of that Flickr picture under CC-BY-SA. There is no prove of that. It is only my experience that with such a prestigious prize, sculptures are made by artists with some name. I think we should track down the artist, and let the artist decide. I have given this a try myself looking for that artist online, but was unsuccessful. I guess contacting the TEDx Amsterdam organization should be an option here, if Vera wants to keep these images here. -- Mdd (talk) 23:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- The copyright holder of the statue is then perhaps willing to grant a similar permission for these photos through OTRS. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- These images are pictures of a bronze sculpture, which although used as an award, still could/should be considered a work of art. It seems to me extra permission of the artist is required. Now you are right about that there is a very nice picture on flickr, but that doesn't give you the permission for your pictures. -- Mdd (talk) 02:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Still haven't heard back. I guess it's a bit embarrassing to ask the people you got an award from who made it because you gave it away again. I suppose this means my pictures will have to be deleted in the protection of the copyright of the unknown author. --Vera (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Original author couldn't be tracked down. Vera (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Also appears at various other places, e.g. here, but not in the same resolution as far as I can see. Stefan4 (talk) 21:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
![21:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/03/15#c-Stefan4-2012-03-15T21:33:00.000Z-File:"Love_of_Millions".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 03:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
![03:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/03/15#c-Denniss-2012-06-18T03:51:00.000Z-File:"Love_of_Millions".jpg){kind=link}
Artsy photo with no metadata, quite low filesize and under 1MP. Possible copyvio? -mattbuck (Talk) 02:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Image appears elsewhere on the net, including http://bleacherreport.com/articles/762241-college-football-2011-the-best-kept-secret-from-every-bcs-team Ytoyoda (talk) 03:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Wrong license. This painting could be in public domain, but no clue about that in the image page. Sreejith K (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This is an obvious copyvio - an official period Ford marketing photograph. Also check the other deleted uploads from the same user. Mr.choppers (talk) 06:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyright violation Gugganij (talk) 06:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyright violation Gugganij (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a sculpture by Alfred Courtens (1889-1967). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 07:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a logo of a university in Indonesia, so it cannot be a government work as perscribed by this license. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Image containing deleted image: File:Emblem of TuAF.svg. Takabeg (talk) 08:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture by a living sculptor, Jacques Nisot. There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a sculpture by a living sculptor, Jacques Nisot. There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a bust by Georges Petit (1879-1958) (source). There is no FOP in France. BrightRaven (talk) 10:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Useless for lack of quality. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of the scope 丁 (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of the scope. 丁 (talk) 13:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I strongly doubt that this copyright release was valid. DS (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
derived work of nonfree content (screenshot of commercial website) DS (talk) 14:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No credible evidence of the licensing claimed; creator has claimed "all rights reserved" on the same photo on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/liamch/5858360623/ Gump Stump (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Architect died in 1956, no-FOP in Belgium M0tty (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:14, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
See copy vio from a website, with size and quality, see http://www.ambujarealty.com/projects/residency/upohar-luxury-gold/convenience-comfort.asp Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:26, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
copy vio from a website, see http://www.qscaudio.com/press/news.php?id=136%7Csubpage=File:Metropolis Mall Kolkata.jpg Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 17:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot of (c) material Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 19:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, belongs to wikipedia Ezarateesteban 19:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, please send this email to COM:OTRS Ezarateesteban 19:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, a love letter with no educational value. Savhñ 20:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: just a line! Stefan4 (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The file information page says CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 but the licence claim is sourced to [4] which also mentions other licences. Not sure what the correct licence for this image might be. Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Also here. Stefan4 (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Collage without reference to the original images. Stefan4 (talk) 21:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Confusing licences: CC-BY-SA 1.0 and CC-Zero. The original map is CC-BY-SA 2.5 which is not compatible with version 1.0. Stefan4 (talk) 22:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Also here and it says "contact me for commercial licensing information" which contradicts with the licences specified. Stefan4 (talk) 22:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
copyright http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Udg0geICw3UJ:www.mines-telecom.fr/p_fr_imt_presenta_chcles_460.html+&cd=2&hl=fr&ct=clnk&gl=fr Tiraden (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obviously wrong licence claim. Not sure if it qualifies as PD-textlogo or not. It looks a bit complex. Stefan4 (talk) 22:44, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
_Logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
_Logo.png){kind=link}
Also appears in lower resolution elsewhere. Note how the date in {{Information}} contradicts with the date in EXIF. Stefan4 (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot of software published under an unidentified licence. Stefan4 (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Bigger image on given flickr-source claims all rights reserved Funfood ␌ 23:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, useless for lack of quality. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, useless for lack of quality. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
See COM:CUR#The Netherlands: this is not yet 70 years. Stefan4 (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio? Source, author and permission listed as "Lombard-Field Projects", which might mean this is graffiti but I really have no idea. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
![22:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/03/15#c-Mattbuck-2012-03-15T22:25:00.000Z-File:Chalk_drawing_"Bush_talk_to_Europe".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
![20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/03/15#c-Fastily-2012-07-23T20:04:00.000Z-File:Chalk_drawing_"Bush_talk_to_Europe".jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in the Philippines and the statues+building are not dated, so impossible to tell if they are free or not. Additionally: collage without references to the included images. Stefan4 (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Dupe of DJVU file (see image). Not sure if {{Duplicate}} works if the format is different and a page number needs to be specified. Stefan4 (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.blockwb.net/expo-sala/index-fotos.html http://www.mural-abad.net/5_29.html . HombreDHojalata.talk 22:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as well as other uploads by Mariapb (talk · contribs). Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. MBisanz talk 03:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Historical photo of some sort. Possibly copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. Unlikely uploader is author. FASTILY (TALK) 06:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Historical photo of some sort. Possibly copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. Unlikely uploader is author. FASTILY (TALK) 06:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Historical photo of some sort. Possibly copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. Unlikely uploader is author. FASTILY (TALK) 06:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I dont have to use the picture. The photo is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic, not under fair use. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- That doesn't say anything about this nomination, I didn't nominate for copyright reasons. The nomination is about scope. The presence of a valid license doesn't make a picture in scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- I might be lost in translation so I have no idea what you are on about so please elaborate. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Out of scope means that this file is not useful for educational purposes. If you think this file can be useful, please tell us why. If you convince me, I will cancel the nomination. At least the closing administrator will take your eventual explanation into account. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- I might be lost in translation so I have no idea what you are on about so please elaborate. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- That doesn't say anything about this nomination, I didn't nominate for copyright reasons. The nomination is about scope. The presence of a valid license doesn't make a picture in scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Her brother was certainly notable. I think we can keep this. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Low resolution for own work. --Art-top (talk) 08:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of a non-free image from Google Maps. —Andrei S. Talk 09:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, {{Copyvio}}. Clearly watermarked. See http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/terms_maps.html. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Is this a notable person? GeorgHH • talk 09:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- KeepI think so - she is a politician from tenerife [[5]].--Funfood ␌ 22:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but this is a derivative of the content on screen and on the display. As this is surely inside, even the display can't be covered by FOP. Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Same problem with File:Xavier Montsalvatge exhibit at Palau Robert (7).JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete obvious copyright violation --Vera (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Euro coins are copyrighted. 84.61.139.62 13:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete-per nom--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence that this is a Swedish photograph or that it is free in the United States. Author is unknown (the image may be used by the Nobel foundation, that doesn't make them the author). Image date unsourced (1930 assertion only based on Nobel date which is not rationally related to the image). We can't host an image lacking vital information on its copyright. Hekerui (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Presumably published in Stockholm in "Les Prix Nobel en 1930". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- How do we know that? Hekerui (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Bottom of the page of source: "This autobiography/biography was written at the time of the award and first published in the book series Les Prix Nobel. It was later edited and republished in Nobel Lectures. To cite this document, always state the source as shown above."--Vera (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- How do we know that? Hekerui (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comments
- (i) The Elsevier reprint can be downloaded at the nevis.columbia.edu page (search for "Nobel Lectures, Physics 1922-1941 site:nevis.columbia.edu"), and surely it does not contain laureate photos - they are only printed in Les Prix Nobel, the note on the nobel.org site refers to the text only. I haven't seen yet any hardcopy reprints of nobel bios with photos, though there are many text reprints.
- (ii) It does not matter for Swedish copyright who and where took the photo; it should be first published in Sweden. AIP attributes this image to A. Bortzells Tryckeri which is a Swedish printing company in Stockholm (Tryckeri = Printing house in Swedish), indirectly supporting the PD-Sweden claim. AIP also puts a copyright mark at the page bottom, but this is a routine blanket protection of the overal site content - many dozens of other sites host this image and do the same, though they obviously copied the image from nobel.org.
- (iii) The photo is taken before 1930s (cf. this)
- No website identifies the image author/date; there is some circumstantial evidence it was printed in Sweden, long, long ago (apparently A. Bortzells was only active in the early 1900s), and there is no evidence anyone else published it untill the advent of the internet. Any factual information can help resolve this case; as it stands, I'm leaning to keep. Materialscientist (talk) 07:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- The Commons precautionary principle suggests removal if we only have circumstantial evidence it was printed in Sweden, long, long ago and lack factual information. Hekerui (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is not that circumstantial: AIP Visual Archives is a serious image library, paying much attention to copyright and authors (nearly all their images are credited, often to non-trivial sources); its crediting the image to Bortzells Tryckeri does mean it was published in Sweden, and there is little doubt it was published before 1969, in Le Prix Nobel. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- And what about the U.S., what evidence do we have its free there? Hekerui (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- {{PD-1996}} - the Swedish publication predates the US one (AIP). Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- And what about the U.S., what evidence do we have its free there? Hekerui (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is not that circumstantial: AIP Visual Archives is a serious image library, paying much attention to copyright and authors (nearly all their images are credited, often to non-trivial sources); its crediting the image to Bortzells Tryckeri does mean it was published in Sweden, and there is little doubt it was published before 1969, in Le Prix Nobel. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- The Commons precautionary principle suggests removal if we only have circumstantial evidence it was printed in Sweden, long, long ago and lack factual information. Hekerui (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Apart from the fact that it's hard to tell whether this was really published in 1965 (note that 1965 photographs are PD in Finland, while 1966 are not), there are also quality issues that make it questionable whether this image is useful in depicting Urho Kekkonen in an educational purpose. Both versions of the image clearly have parts of the suit drawn on top of an existing image, with a painted single-colour background. We have a fair number of actual photographs that can be used to illustrate pages about Kekkonen. Jafeluv (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Motopark (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- "Hard to tell" means nothing imo. Do you have a real reason to doubt it being from 65? Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, good point. I can't really prove the date right or wrong without browsing through every issue of Helsingin Sanomat from 1965. The uploader does have a history of copyright violations, but afaik not of outright falsifications, so I may have been a little too quick to doubt the license. The unlikely-to-be-useful-for-an-educational-purpose part still applies, though. Jafeluv (talk) 00:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm far from a friend of the uploader, I am well aware of his history. But I don't see a reason to doubt the age, at this stage anyways. It's not in use however, so that is something to discuss. Fry1989 eh? 00:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, good point. I can't really prove the date right or wrong without browsing through every issue of Helsingin Sanomat from 1965. The uploader does have a history of copyright violations, but afaik not of outright falsifications, so I may have been a little too quick to doubt the license. The unlikely-to-be-useful-for-an-educational-purpose part still applies, though. Jafeluv (talk) 00:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- "Hard to tell" means nothing imo. Do you have a real reason to doubt it being from 65? Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Although the copyright is a question, the quality and retouching issue is real -- we have 47 other images. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sorry, but FOP exemption in Spain[6] seems not to include works inside of buildings. Thereby this would be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Same problem with File:Saló del Bon Govern (1961).JPG. --Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
- OK, I then would agree to delete the front-view photos of a copyrighted modern painting, but not when the photo is taken from an angle, and the image includes other items in the room. --Jordiferrer (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, in both images the focus is on the painting. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I do agree with you regarding the Tapies painting, but not on the second one. When I took that second photo my goal was to get an overall view of the "Saló del Bon Govern" room, and not of any of its specific paintings. I think "De minimis" applies in this second case.--Jordiferrer (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- O.k. This DR is a good place to discuss this issue with other users. --Túrelio (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I do agree with you regarding the Tapies painting, but not on the second one. When I took that second photo my goal was to get an overall view of the "Saló del Bon Govern" room, and not of any of its specific paintings. I think "De minimis" applies in this second case.--Jordiferrer (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, in both images the focus is on the painting. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete File:Complement Miraculós, pintura d’Antoni Tàpies (2004).JPG but keep File:Saló del Bon Govern (1961).JPG, although it can be seen as a borderline case.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: The fact that the image is taken from an angle is irrelevant. In the second case, virtually the whole image is painting -- just because it is on walls and ceiling does not make it any less a problem. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Dated 2004 which is Not OK per COM:CUR#Bosnia and Herzegovina. Stefan4 (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Architect (Victor Horta) died in 1947, no-FOP in Belgium M0tty (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep These buildings are part of UNESCO heritage, they have a value all around the world so, beyond the copyright, there is a real need for wikipedia to keep a picture of these buildings. The owner of the copyright never askeded for removal of theses pictures on wikipedia. Moreover, the copyright expires in 5 years anyway. --Freb (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- There are no Freedom of Panorama in Belgium, so this picture is a copyright violation. --M0tty (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The architect has a copyright. Belgian law (and that in 43 other countries) says we must honor it. The fact that we would like very much to keep the image is regrettable but cannot change the conclusion. As for the question of whether the architect will enforce, see Precautionary principle #1 and #3. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:10, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
It says that the photographer died at least 70 years ago yet he is unknown. Has a copyright notice on the source web site. If unpublished, the British copyright expires on 1 January 19402040 or, if published before that date, 70 years after publication. Stefan4 (talk) 22:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- We know that the photo was produced in 1891. Assuming it was published at that time (it is regularly featured in various publications) if we add 70 years the copyright expires in 1961. This leaves considerable margin for error if it was published a bit later. Dormskirk (talk) 18:11, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- It appears to be a post card so would have been published soon after it was produced. Suggest a change to Template:PD-UK-unknown MilborneOne (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for that very helpful suggestion. I have amended the template. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- It appears to be a post card so would have been published soon after it was produced. Suggest a change to Template:PD-UK-unknown MilborneOne (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
No evidence as to why this qualifies for the given licence. We have no idea if there was a copyright notice, all we know is that this scan does not have one. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I just uploaded the file from it.wikipedia. Then, after the request for more specific information, I have tried to give her. --raul (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Available for "printing and reproduction" but nothing about derivative works as far as I can see... Stefan4 (talk) 23:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Should the license details be changed? Perhaps this fits under the "non-free content" category but can still be posted in the Wikipedia article. The poster is clearly meant for free distribution by anyone. ClassicalBookworm (talk) 04:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The source site has an explicit (c). The poster celebrates a day honoring the concept of copyright. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be a federal court. Stefan4 (talk) 23:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- No? Keep Fry1989 eh? 06:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Seems to be run by the State of Montana, but I could be wrong. Note the copyright notice in the footer on the court's website. Federal web sites normally don't carry a copyright notice since federal works aren't copyrighted. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- "United States District Court for the District of Montana" makes it a federal Court. As for the copyright notice, that can apply to th ewebsite, but it can not apply to the seal, which is PD. Fry1989 eh? 23:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Seems to be run by the State of Montana, but I could be wrong. Note the copyright notice in the footer on the court's website. Federal web sites normally don't carry a copyright notice since federal works aren't copyrighted. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
It pretty clearly says district court which makes it a federal court, and it is also on the federal court website as you posted. I am confused how you could think this is from a state court. Thus, it is clearly within the public domain for the reasons stated on the file (Fed. U.S. Gov).Boaltie (talk) 17:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware that US district courts are federal courts. I don't know very much about US court. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
This appears to be resolved in favor of keep, because it is a public domain image due to being a work of the US Federal Gov't. This should be closed. Brianwc (talk) 21:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete A Tineye search shows this has been nabbed from porn sites elsewhere and so is highly likely to be a copyright violation. The other images by this uploader have the same problem and this deletion request should apply to them too - [7]. --Fæ (talk) 14:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Low resolution for own work. --Art-top (talk) 08:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Falsche Bezeichnung Unterillertaler (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hat sich doch wohl erledigt, da das Bild umbenannt (und damit jetzt korrekt bezeichnet) ist, oder?--BerlinSight (talk) 10:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Ja, das hat sich erledigt. Trotzdem Vielen Dank.--Unterillertaler (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Problem fixed -FASTILY (TALK) 03:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Proprietary licence according to en:Le Lisp. Stefan4 (talk) 21:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
While Le_Lisp is under Proprietary licence, File:Aida Le-Lisp on Windows.jpg is a screenshot made by Le_Lisp on Windows owner (me) and explicitly declared as (GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 ), What should I do now? --Cjullien (talk) 07:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Are you saying that you are the copyright holder of the Le Lisp software? If so, please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 03:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The uploader user:Dream IVIaster said it was Chantal Dupille gave him the picture, unknowed author; next, user:Chantal dupille says she is ok, "familly picture" ([8]); next, user:Chantal dupille says it's her husband takes the picture (Elle a été prise par mon mari): so, we know the author, but the uploader is another person, no proof "Mr Dupille" gave is work under "Public Domain", we need his authorisation via OTRS, or from heirs if he is dead... or... delete the file. --MGuf (d) 08:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chantal_dupille.jpg&diff=next&oldid=34130960){kind=link}
-- Juste pour info "Dream" est mon fils, je lui ai demandé de mettre la photo sur Wikipedia ne sachant pas le faire (les plus jeunes sont très forts en informatique), sans lui dire qui avait fait la photo ne pensant pas que c'était important (il ne m'a pas posé la question, d'ailleurs, je pense). C'est son père qui l'a prise à ma demande, chez nous en Alsace, voilà c'est tout simple. De toutes façons j'ai contacté un informaticien professionnel qui est en train de faire les démarches pour la rendre publique "commons" je ne sais quoi (moi je ne sais pas faire je ne suis pas technicienne). Mais comme il est en instance de déménagement, il ne peut trop passer de temps à la fois. Mais il s'en occupe. Donc on suivra la procédure pour qu'elle soit publique, accessible à tous. Et tout ce que j'ai dit est vrai, j'ai horreur du mensonge. C'est une photo de famille, elle sera bientôt publique via la procédure demandée, d'ailleurs elle l'est déjà car elle figure sur un de mes ouvrages en couverture. Chantal Dupille, 6 avril 2012. NB Et si je n'ai pas dit plus tôt que Dream était mon fils, c'est justement parce que je ne voulais pas en faire une affaire de famille, je voulais la discrétion (qu'il a respectée en prenant ses distances à ma demande) car je sépare toujours vie privée et vie publique. Je voulais une tierce personne pour mettre la photo car je ne savais pas faire, j'ai pensé à mon fils car il s'y connaît bien en informatique, comme j'aurais pu demander à un technicien de s'occuper de la chose. Et l'informaticien qui s'occupe de remettre la photo, je ne le connais pas, lui, c'est par un lecteur ami que tout se passe désormais. Et il n'y a pas une fausse déclaration dans tout ce que je dis. Evidemment ! C D 6 4 12. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chantal dupille (talk • contribs) 6 avril 2012 à 01:19 (UTC)
- Il faut que l'auteur (mari de madame, dont le nom nous est inconnu) fasse parvenir par OTRS l'autorisation de mettre son oeuvre (cette photo) sous licence libre, en pleine connaissance de ce que ça implique (re-utilisation sans demande préalable de l'image pour tous usages, y compris commerciaux). Merci. ----MGuf (d) 11:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Réponse Chantal Dupille : Merci Monsieur. Je vais plutôt suivre la procédure proposée il y a quelques semaines par EUTERPIA, plutôt que de demander à mon ex-mari, plutôt que d'en faire une affaire de famille, avec nom et tout. CETTE page figure en tête de Google quand on tape chantal dupille. Donc plutôt qu'impliquer mon ex mari, ma famille, je vais faire ce qui m'a été recommandé par la contributrice Euterpia, l'informaticien y travaille depuis un moment c'est difficile et délicat comme procédure. Et si ça pose trop de problèmes, on se passera de photo, ou j'en ferai faire une par un tiers, sans lien familial avec moi, qui suivra ce qui est indiqué un peu plus haut. Je n'aurais pas fait mettre de photo si j'avais su qu'il faudrait impliquer publiquement des proches, ou que cela poserait soudain tant de problèmes (juste après mon soutien à François Asselineau victime d'un black-out organisé). Je voulais une photo car lorsque je vais sur Wikipedia, j'aime bien visualiser la personne. Si c'est trop compliqué, tant pis, on abandonne. Il ne restera quasiment plus rien de ma fiche depuis que j'ai osé soutenir le candidat qui dénonce la France sous tutelle. chantal dupille 6 avril 2012 17 h 21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chantal dupille (talk • contribs) 6 avril 2012 à 16:21 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission. Email COM:OTRS and have them restore the file if you do. FASTILY (TALK) 08:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DmitryGaliullin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free logos.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kobac (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - obvious copyvios. Mr.choppers (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Tables
[edit]
Also here. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)