Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/03/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![26 File:Dj Aztel "Los Musicarios Del Barrio" The Mixtape Coming Soon (Prod By Terra 4-19 Studio).jpg](#File:Dj_Aztel_"Los_Musicarios_Del_Barrio"_The_Mixtape_Coming_Soon_(Prod_By_Terra_4-19_Studio).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![147 File:"Ramana Maharishi with Kavyakanta Ganapathi Muni.jpg".jpg](#File:"Ramana_Maharishi_with_Kavyakanta_Ganapathi_Muni.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
AUTHOR REQUESTING FULL DELETION - FILE CONTAINS PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION AND IT A PRIVACY CONCERN. THANK YOU Jculottta (talk) 05:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Sreejith K (talk) 10:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав. Изображение датируется 2001 годом. Это картина художника И. Мамонтова. http://ivmamontov.narod.ru/HTMLs_2/polz7.html Anton Chorny (talk) 14:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed. Donna know what was written in the source web page that time, probably it was declared as an old painting. A.Savin 14:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Presumably copyrighted advert, which someone has unhelpfully edited... Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Advert, out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete educational importance questionable! Gegensystem (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Keep - just about our only photo of sexual penetrative use of non-dildos. Other pictures are either drawings, purpose-made sex toys or a toothbrush. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)- Keep as mattbuck said ... --Don-kun (talk) 12:52, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per “Commons does not need you to drop your pants and grab a camera.“ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Nudity --Hold and wave (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Do you even look at the images up for deletion, or do you actually just c/p the same remark into every DR, regardless of content? -mattbuck (Talk) 15:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The quality isn't that great, but, people do use these things as sex toys, and such. I changed the description a bit. Missvain (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
31.57.143.7 13:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep No new reason for deletion given. Image is still of good quality and in scope. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 14:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy kept - no reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
This file is inappropriate for minors and should be moved to an age-appropriate area inaccessible to minors! This came up in a keyword search under ball as one of the first images! Suitable for all audiences???? Really??? I THINK NOT! 173.22.234.9 21:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Educational, free, high quality, personality rights aren't relevant due to the face being blurred. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 03:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No significantly different deletion reason than the other two (2) deletion discussions for this image that both resulted in "Kept.", as well. -- Cirt (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This image is highly inappropriate for minors! Either move it to an area inaccessible to children or DELETE IT! 173.22.234.9 21:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation Edgars2007 (talk) 15:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- And this file too. --Edgars2007 (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm nominating these two files, too:
- --Edgars2007 (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, there are some more files from this user:
- --Edgars2007 (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: all copyvios Denniss (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
quality is so bad, no use possible, except as bad example. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality, {{Out of scope}} Sreejith K (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Equivalent to File:Liaisons hydrogènes entre molécules de cellulose.png, except has stray marks, large white margins, and more low-resolution caption text in image DMacks (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Leyo 10:25, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Low quality, replaced by File:1,4-dichlorobutane.svg. Leyo 16:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. All sorts of pixelation artifacts and small size the inhibit reuse, cf. given .svg or a trivially-redrawn (or exported-from-svg) high-res raster if someone really needed it. DMacks (talk) 01:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom NEURO ⇌ 09:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Random file from the internet. Megapixie (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- See also the rest of the uploaders contributions. Megapixie (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg ~ Fry1989 eh? 00:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The SVG flag is better. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused scaled down duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
A private school calendar? No educational use. Get Outlook. :) Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
No information about what and where and when. No educational value. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, only a checklist for someone writing to obtain a degree. Correct me if I am wrong. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
As far as I can tell: Pre degree paper, some kind of homework. Out of scope. Correct me if I am wrong. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Source=Facebook. Put it back on Facebook. :-} No educational value Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Business card, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Band spam, Source = facebook [1] 124 likes! :) Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Facebook spam for a company in Lyon, FR. If I knew who that lady is, I think I'd keep it, even if the image is a bit tiny. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Dj Aztel "Los Musicarios Del Barrio" The Mixtape Coming Soon (Prod By Terra 4-19 Studio).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Formula can be written in text and is even incomplete and therefore totally useless this way. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 00:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Faked picture to compromise some one not notable (privacy violation) MoiraMoira (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Redundant image: de facto duplicate of File:Villagehall2.JPG, inexplicably converted to GIF. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Very poor personal image (of a pet) and not in use on a user page, so must be out of scope. —innotata 15:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Uploader's own CV! Stefan4 (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Plain spanish text in a jpg, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 21:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Spanish text in a jpg, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 22:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unclear waht it is, looks out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 22:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Blurry. Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- And copyvio. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, unusable George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
1987 house in Paris. The architect, fr:Jean Nouvel, is still alive. No freedom of panorama in France. Stefan4 (talk) 01:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Per the nominator. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This is a statue by Maurice de Korte (1889-1971).There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Painting by a living artist. His permission is needed. BrightRaven (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a relief by Joseph Witterwulghe (1883-1967). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This is a relief by Jean Lecroart (1883-1967). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This is a relief by Jean Lecroart (1883-1967). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Βερναρδ as Speedy for the following reason: violation de la vie privée, personne identifiable ; publication sans autorisation de personne identifiable ; stigmatisation d’une population (cf. les catégories) ; non respect du droit à l'image des personnes ; aucune garantie que cette personne soit Rom. Sreejith K (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: This may need a rename, but ther women is clearly begging and is in a public place. Italy is apparently OK with imag4es of identifiable people in public places. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No encyclopedic value. Only used in massive spam article en:User:Pepmanrajasekar. Please delete all other uploads by this user - they all poor quality and mostly squashed vertically or horizontally. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Motopark as Speedy for the following reason: out of scope, can be written to some wikipedia Sreejith K (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Rights of used photographs unclear. Funfood ␌ 11:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, no permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm the author. I don't understand why do you want to delete it.--Feministo (talk) 12:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Even if the text is own work, you don't have permission for all of the images in the document. The document doesn't belong to Wikimedia Commons anyway. Articles don't belong to Wikimedia Commons. They belong to Wikipedia instead. Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Most text is not part of Commons mission -- it is out of scope. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Korespondence s katastralnim pracovistem ve Svitavach ohledne datovani katastralnich uprav v okrese Svitavy.pdf
[edit]Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don´t think. It is good example of official letter that is written by Land Registry in the Czech Republic. --Dezidor (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I prepared and uploaded this crop without noticing that a better version was already in Commons, namely File:Saguaro_gatherers2.jpg. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Lorenzo Coullaut Valera (1876—1932). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I beliewe, this whole affair with FOP in Belgium is big nonsence and made really great pointlesss troubless to many good working wikipedians. For Belgium FOP there is written: Modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photograph without permission of the artwork copyright holder. But Wikipedia is not commercial subject, everything here is based on voluntary, complimetary contributions of all Wikipedians and Wikipedia did not offer its work for any commercial usage! So, please, use common sense and stop this absurd hunting for images like this one. Thanks,--Karelj (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Actually, I made a mistake: this sculpture is in the public domain since Valera died in 1932. Sorry. BrightRaven (talk) 07:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Note to Karelj -- Your argument is incorrect. Commons requires that all images be available for commercial use. This is a keep only because the creator died before 1942 Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Lorenzo Coullaut Valera (1876—1932). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I beliewe, this whole affair with FOP in Belgium is big nonsence and made really great pointlesss troubless to many good working wikipedians. For Belgium FOP there is written: Modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photograph without permission of the artwork copyright holder. But Wikipedia is not commercial subject, everything here is based on voluntary, complimetary contributions of all Wikipedians and Wikipedia did not offer its work for any commercial usage! So, please, use common sense and stop this absurd hunting for images like this one. Thanks, --Karelj (talk) 21:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- COM:L: "Wikimedia Commons accepts only free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose." BrightRaven (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Actually, I made a mistake: this sculpture is in the public domain since Valera died in 1932. Sorry. BrightRaven (talk) 07:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- COM:L: "Wikimedia Commons accepts only free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose." BrightRaven (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Lorenzo Coullaut Valera (1876—1932). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Actually, I made a mistake: this sculpture is in the public domain since Valera died in 1932. Sorry. BrightRaven (talk) 08:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by Lorenzo Coullaut Valera (1876—1932). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Actually, I made a mistake: this sculpture is in the public domain since Valera died in 1932. Sorry. BrightRaven (talk) 08:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I loaded the wrong one Heavymetalover (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
This picture was uploaded by accident. Shatton8111 (talk) 13:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
This picture shouldn't have been uploaded. Shatton8111 (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Hof-07.jpg Jonas849 (talk) 14:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be from this PDF: http://www.villageofhoward.com/cm/pdfs/Welcome%20Packet1.pdf Ytoyoda (talk) 14:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author is 石鲁（1919－1982）, Not PD shizhao (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Prof. Dr. Karin Büttner-Janz wants this picture showing herself with Walter Ulbricht to be deleted. as fast as possible. is there any possibility to for me as her secretary to do that? Sl blue (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep Is this an attempt to whitewash history and put under the rug an presently inconvenient aspect for this former athlete? I ask this as this image depicts Karin Büttner-Janz a year after being nominated "East German Athlete of the Year" and Walter Ulbricht. This image was taken in an public homenage made by the "State Council of the German Democratic Republic" to the DDR olimpic team of 1968, the same Olimpic Games in which Karin Büttner-Janz won "the silver medal on the uneven bars and a bronze medal as part of the country's gymnastics team at the 1968 Summer Olympics". As it says in this caption, this image depicts this athlete and Walther Ulbritcht who was then the "The First Secretary of the SED Central Committee (the political party that then ruled the DDR) and Chairman of the Council of State, so as sayed by the deletion requester it wants this image deleted as it depicts this athlete with Walter Ulbricht (the leader of the DDR that was ruled as a dictatorship). Also not that this image was released by the Bundesarchiv (the German Federal Archives) and is avaible on its site and was taken by Eva Brüggmann in a public event and one that surely was well published and made as propaganda in those years in the DDR and the others Warsaw Pact countries. Also file is in use in de.wikipedia.org in "Karin Büttner-Janz" article and in en.wikipedia.org in "Patriotic Order of Merit" article. Tm (talk) 02:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: We do not generally delete images at the request of the subject, particularly not if they are in use. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Conflicting source information - the uploader claims authorship, but uses "Village of Howard" for "permission". Ytoyoda (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Wrong method. Nails are not to be used when applying, due to the risk of scratches. Eak86 (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In use, the information in this request should be added to the file's description page, but not given as the reason for deletion per COM:NPOV. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 07:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, licensed as public domain, so that's not an issue, and it's used on many other project sites. -- Cirt (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Properly licensed and widely used. The simple fact that there is disagreement over the method being used is not grounds alone for deletion. Like Beta_M said, maybe that is a good thing to add the to file's description? Tiptoety talk 23:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Per Tiptoety/Beta_M. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
stamps copyrighted in China. shizhao (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
no permission since March 13, 2012 Yaya7812 (talk) 15:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
no permission Yaya7812 (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: This is a USA image, taken around 1882 and clearly published. Therefore PD-1923 applies. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Renomination #1
the user does not have permission to use 130.111.96.115 17:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
this photo was first published in 1980's, therefore it is under owner copyright 130.111.96.115 17:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept Nonsense. The image is in the form of a card, so it was clearly published before 1923 and therefore PD. However, even if it were not published until recently, it is still PD because all USA images created before 1892 are PD, even if never published.
I also note that you now nominated this for deletion three times, using two different names. That is a serious violation of our rules. If you take similar action again, you will blocked from editing on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Renomination #2
no permission 130.111.96.115 12:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
not in public domain, it was first published in the 1980's 130.111.96.115 12:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy keep -- user blocked for three days What part of the explanation and warning above didn't you understand? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Same format as File:Cellulose Sessel.svg but lower quality due to non-standard angles, leading to the following problems: methylene carbons are harder to see in the CH2OH group attached to each ring) and one of the OH on the right-hand ring is unusually positioned as well. Widely used image at more recognizeable name than improved replacement, so I have not yet actually replaced...will do so if others think that is better than this, or else maybe this should just become a redirect? DMacks (talk) 14:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I agree that File:Cellulose Sessel.svg is better. I'd recommend just uploading File:Cellulose Sessel.svg over File:Cellulose-2D-skeletal.svg - no need for deletion! One can be made a redirect to the other if required. --Slashme (talk) 10:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep File:Cellulose-2D-skeletal.svg is a good image. It might not be perfect, but what is the damage of having a few alternative versions? I don't think we need to narrow down the variety of chemical structures here on Commons to the "best" ones available. Not to mention that it would be very difficult to agree on criteria for which structures are best (a discussion also users from the other projects would want to participate in – after all Commons is mainly a service provider to the wikipedias, wikibooks etc.). To my mind there's no reason to sort out multiple versions of chemical structures as long as they are correct and of acceptable quality. --NEURO ⇌ 08:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- What's the point of having an alternative that is difficult to understand and doesn't provide any improvement in any other aspect? I know you and I are on opposite sides of "variety for variety's sake" in terms of various aspects of diagram-style, but this isn't just MOS-compliance or nonstandard (to some concept of "standard") and equivalently "good" otherwise...stylistic details here interferes with interpreting the content/meaning IMO. DMacks (talk) 22:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete. Ed (Edgar181) 13:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pinetreepainter (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission.
- File:The Georgian Bay eframe 40 x 48 inch high res.jpg
- File:Sunny day web logo dec 2011.jpg
- File:"Un Petit peu de ciel" A Piece of Heaven 30"x36" Oil on canvas.jpg
- File:The Beacon, 36"x48" oil on canvas.jpg
- File:Making a living as an artist 2011 2012.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal pictures.
- File:BigChoc Photoo.jpg
- File:Jamal Big Choc.png
- File:Big Choc Picture.jpg
- File:Big-Choc.jpg
- File:Big Choc Shoot.jpg
- File:Big Choc Photo.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cepiwanfoundation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal pictures.
- File:CEP JOON PYO - The Vision.jpg
- File:CEP JOON PYO - The Medicine.jpg
- File:CEP JOON PYO - Charisma.jpg
- File:CEP JOON PYO Motorcycle.jpg
- File:CEP JOON PYO - Shore.jpg
- File:CEP JOON PYO.jpg
Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SebaIgnacio (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission.
- File:Elvis Presley Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Mariah Carey Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Katy Perry Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Justin Bieber y Illapu Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Janis Joplin Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Isabel Pantoja Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Alicia Keys (Catalina) Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
- File:Illapu, Rihanna, Beyoncé Mi Nombre Es Canal 13.jpg
_Mi_Nombre_Es_Canal_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:07, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Promo pics, probably copy vio. Article twice deleted on eswiki [2]
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hadjiganev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Art spam. Commons is not a replacement for flickr or photobucket. Unknown painter from France. See frwiki [3] discussion.
- File:Après-midi hivernal (200x300cm).JPG
- File:Couchant Semonsut 2 (100x100cm).JPG
- File:Ombre et lumière (81x130cm).JPG
- File:Coup de vent (200x200cm).JPG
- File:Calvados (46x61 cm).JPG
- File:Arbre au bord du chemin (81x60cm).jpg
- File:2 arbres en hiver (80x40cm).jpg
- File:Anglard-brume (40x50cm).jpg
- File:AlbertH.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete --Vera (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted
User experiment. No educational value
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BPAssocies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam account, see frwiki [4]
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
because for it is not the time Sim Johnson (talk) 04:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Valentini17 as Speedy for the following reason: delete il titolo è sbagliato Sreejith K (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Valentini17 as Speedy for the following reason: delete il titolo è sbagliato Sreejith K (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
screenshot quality is looooooooooooooooooooow, can't read a thing. can't be used for anything Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, because it's a mistake, and forgotten file, Sorry, I will remove this picture. Err404 (talk) 08:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
I try remove this file, but I can't Err404 (talk)
- No problem, administrators will delete the file. I like your user name, btw. That's why you forgot about the file. 404 - not found :-)) --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete File is of no use.
Hedwig in Washington Do not make fun of a fellow user. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
Comment I was making fun with, not about my fellow user. If anyone considers this little joke to be rude I sincerely apologize! --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 11:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Low quality unused image with no educational scope Sreejith K (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Footbal magazine page, rights of photographs unclear Funfood ␌ 00:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Doesn't look like own work to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The cartoon has not been published under CC BY-SA 2.5 license, but CC BY-NC-ND 2.5. Wikimedia Commons does not accept non-derivative, non-commercial licenses. Americophile 04:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination because of User:555/Latuff, but the license needs to be fixed. Americophile 04:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Denniss (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Website doesn't exist (anymore), can't verify free usage. Not own work anyway. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Website doesn't exist (anymore), can't verify free usage. Not own work anyway. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Can't verify free usage. Not own work anyway. Spam for torrent pay site Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --GeorgHH • talk 09:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Ilikeeatingwaffles as Copyvio for the following reason: Uses trademarked Nike swoosh and Kia logo Sreejith K (talk) 07:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Denniss (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
not own work (http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/211897_100002406833374_1291454_q.jpg) out of scope (personal pic.) McZusatz (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Unfree logo from http://www.fireislandbeer.com/ Funfood ␌ 19:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope and dubious copyright status. Stefan4 (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Credited to "NASA/JPL-Caltech." No evidence that Caltech has allowed distribution under the GFDL. Stefan4 (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Changed to standard NASA license template Denniss (talk) 11:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
"Source: Barber Motorsports Ala." could suggest copyvio. EXIF creation date is in the future. Stefan4 (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have an established line of communication with the rights owner in OTRS ticket 2012031210012571 and have marked this as pending while the situation unfolds. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- And I've removed the pending. While the ticket in question did not expicitly release this photo, it did put beyond reasonable doubt that the uploader has the right to upload and license this file. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
"Description: official photo for Art Of Dying" contradicts with "Source: Own work". Copyvio likely. Stefan4 (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Looks more like a copyvio of a cover than an own work. Stefan4 (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Appears here under an unfree licence. Stefan4 (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also published here. No evidence that the Commons user and the Facebook user are the same. The user names differ a lot. Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also here. No evidence that the Commons user and the Facebook user are the same. Stefan4 (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Web resolution, probably copied from random website Bulwersator (talk) 21:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Dubious source: "Facebook,gmail". Can't find it anywhere. Stefan4 (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Dubious own work: also here. Stefan4 (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also here but the uploader's user name suggests that the uploader and the copyright holder might be the same person. Needs OTRS permission I suppose. Stefan4 (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Newspaper article, photograph doubtfully free Funfood ␌ 22:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also here in smaller resolution. Stefan4 (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also here. The uploader claims that this is the uploader's own page, but I think that this would need to go through OTRS. Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also here. Stefan4 (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Information}} says published elsewhere, no evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Marked as © all rights reserved at cited source page http://www.haryana-online.com/Fauna/jungle_cat.htm and no evidence for permission here MPF (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Looks clear. Maybe original uploader got some kind of permission, but, as far as I can see, he's retired so Delete. Yarl ✉ 10:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Also appears here but the uploader insists that the uploader took the photo in a Special:EmailUser message: "so I can not post photos I took at NAS lemoore? guess wiki is anti American. all you foreigners dont like the truth. rag head mother fucking terrorist" Needs OTRS confirmation I think. For the uploader: check COM:OTRS for instructions on how to send in permission. For others: see also File:VAQ 129 NAS Widbey Island.jpg with a blatantly wrong author credit and licence on a different file uploaded by the same user. Stefan4 (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
just for now Sim Johnson (talk) 04:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
dictionar roman german 86.107.41.11 16:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - no reason for deletion. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Deutsch: (missing text)Ich sehe nicht, welches hier der Grund einer Löschung sein sollte!
- Română: (missing text)Eu nu inteleg care este aici motivul de ştergere! --L.Kenzel 15:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid rationale for deletion given. Jafeluv (talk) 10:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
There is no purpose for this image as it is not a screenshot of an actual program and thus does not serve its intended purpose. —danhash (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a screenshot of an actual program, the copyrighted artwork part being edited. It could be used on Wikipedia projects not allowing non free screenshots in their EDP. --Dereckson (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- It was a screenshot of a program. There is absolutely no usefulness to this image now that it has been edited. The edit removed an integral part of the program interface, resulting in an image that now has no real purpose. Furthermore, it was edited in a way that it is not readily apparent that the interface has been changed. There is simply no reason for this image to exist, and this point was raised in the deletion discussion for the original image: Michaeldsuarez said "The ion cannon image is an integral part of the LOIC's identity. Editing the ion cannon image out of the screenshot is the equivalent of editing out the pink ribbons from photographs of breast cancer awareness events. I don't believe that the ion cannon should be edited out." —danhash (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree respectfully, this image is still interesting, to show the interface and the options, and thus, have an educational valid as in COM:SCOPE. --Dereckson (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- It was a screenshot of a program. There is absolutely no usefulness to this image now that it has been edited. The edit removed an integral part of the program interface, resulting in an image that now has no real purpose. Furthermore, it was edited in a way that it is not readily apparent that the interface has been changed. There is simply no reason for this image to exist, and this point was raised in the deletion discussion for the original image: Michaeldsuarez said "The ion cannon image is an integral part of the LOIC's identity. Editing the ion cannon image out of the screenshot is the equivalent of editing out the pink ribbons from photographs of breast cancer awareness events. I don't believe that the ion cannon should be edited out." —danhash (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep as per above. --McZusatz (talk) 15:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment – For the reason File:LoicNewEraCrackerEdited.png exists, please see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LoicNewEraCracker.png. I'll upload the original, unedited version onto enwiki when I return to my personal computer. Due to the language barrier and unfamiliarity, I can't do the same on non-English Wikipedia's. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Already transferred to en:File:LoicNewEraCracker - from Commons.png, you only need to write a fair use rationale, and when it's done, request filemove.
- Anybody willing to check the situation in other WPs: You need to check on meta:EDP if the local Wikipedia projects accept fair use screenshots. fr. doesn't for example. --Dereckson (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As we are discussing the scope, the image seems in our COM:SCOPE and it's already in use on multiple Wikipedias to illustrate the LOIC articles. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In scope & in use. Jafeluv (talk) 09:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
because of some p Sim Johnson (talk) 04:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
because this is not the time to talk about my best friend Sim Johnson (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acosecurite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam, Article deleted on frwiki [5]
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete poor quality--El. (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Facu Verdinegro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtfully "Own work". Five files, five different resolutions (720 × 479px, 600 × 450px, 1 600 × 1 200px, 720 × 540px, 750 × 550px). Two files with two different cams, three files without EXIF. Two files with missing permission. Uploader uploaded some other, deleted, copyvios.
- File:Facundo Baigorria.jpg
- File:Gente que llega temprano.jpg
- File:Estadio Ingeniero Hilario Sanchez.jpg
- File:La Banda Del Pueblo Viejo.jpg
- File:La banda d p viejo.jpg
Saibo (Δ) 01:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 11:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
No FoP exception in Iran. Americophile 18:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: maybe due to bad quality but I don't see any copyrightable. JuTa 19:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
80.177.168.71 removed the {{PD-art}} and claimed "Brancusi died in 1957 and Romania's copyright is life plus 70; and it isn't 2D". I undid his contribution but nominate the image for deletion because I found his argument reasonable. Americophile 00:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Foto seems to be uploaders work, but the artwork is still protected --> deleted but undelete in 2028. JuTa 20:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Probable non-free icons in image. – JBarta (talk) 02:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Now the image is uploaded with the open source software icons for further review. --Yjenith (talk) 08:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Open source I would imagine is fine. And while it's not related to the original issue, this image has me wondering about its potential usefulness. It's of rather poor quality, doesn't seem to show anything of encyclopedic value, and what exactly is a "home screen" since it seems that can be anything you put on it? – JBarta (talk) 05:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- I should be clear, since the non-free icons no longer exist in the image, I'm no longer suggesting it be deleted. My further questions about the image's quality & usefulness are more out of idle curiosity than proposed grounds for deletion. – JBarta (talk) 21:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: first version hided. The quality is not the best but IMHO still wihin scope. JuTa 20:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of possibly non-free content. Americophile 04:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Calligraphy work exceeds IMHO thresholdof originality and no FOP in Iran. JuTa 20:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was tagged by C.Fred as Copyvio for the following reason: Studio picture/frame enlargement claimed as own work Sreejith K (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep When this photo was published copyrights had to be renewed at the 25 (28?) year mark. The studio made the decision that it was too much trouble to renew its copyriht on this movie and a whole whack of movies of the same vintage. Does nominator believe they would choose not to renew their copyright on the film itself, but would still take the trouble to renew the copyright on promotion still for the film? Geo Swan (talk) 22:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Geo Swan JuTa 20:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Author in 陳綿祥, （1900 – 1985), copyrighted. shizhao (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: either copyrighted artwork or out of scope chinese text. JuTa 20:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
This image infringes the architect's copyright. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This is only a normal building without any artistic value in architecture. Monfie (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Copyright does not make judgements on artistic merit. All works of architecture, painting, sculpture, writing, and so forth have copyrights, whether done by Picasso or my grandson. Even if that were not the case, the choice of window shape and surface decoration is clearly imaginative. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The building has some indivudual structiures and there is no FOP in Iran. JuTa 21:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Suspect "flickr washing"; Flickr original and adjacent photostream shows no evidence that it is the contributor's own work MPF (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: proparbly flickr washing; i.e. many different cameras at flickr uploaders fotostream JuTa 21:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Please do not upload twice. See File:Slovakpirateparty.jpg ~ Fry1989 eh? 20:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This one (File:Sps_-_slovak_pirate_party.jpg) is actually higher quality (compare the blue in the coat of arms); if one is deleted, it should be the other one... AnonMoos (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- One or the other, doesn't matter to me, but we don't need both, especially when thy're both JPEGs. Fry1989 eh? 00:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: its a duplicate and the other one is in use. JuTa 21:36, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of some unspecified map, I suppose. Stefan4 (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused and more or less a duplicate of File:Mithila-Bihar-Jhharkhand.jpg JuTa 21:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be a British work by someone who died in 1959. Still copyrighted in the UK. Stefan4 (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: but undelete in 2030 JuTa 21:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
"Historic drawing" could suggest public domain and the date implies PD in the US at least, but the source is dead so the country of origin can't be checked. Stefan4 (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I dont know where the date comes from. The source http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2007/12/australian_murids_ii.php (@uploader: please link your source, its not so difficult!) not says something of "1901 drawing", the section this illustration comes from only speaks of a 2001 book with illustrations. Same problem with File:Long-tailed Hopping Mouse historic drawing.jpg. The book is from "Flannery & Schouten 2001", the second file File:Long-tailed Hopping Mouse historic drawing.jpg comes from http://rainforestinfo.org.au/spp/Schouten/long.htm, there the URL already says "Schouten". And it is from this book, http://rainforestinfo.org.au/spp/Schouten/. So this is stealing from a 2001 book. --Martin H. (talk) 04:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: both as copyright violation. JuTa 21:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Also here so presumably copyvio but I can't read the text. Stefan4 (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio JuTa 21:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of packaging. Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The dog on the packaging exceeds the threshold of originality. JuTa 22:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
empty Cqdx (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Not empty, needed for all images that have no entry yet in the "by country category" subcategories (a basic rule for all metat categories) and for other potential category extensions (history, coverage patterns, technology, types, ...) --Foroa (talk) 05:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: per Foroa. JuTa 22:01, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Shows the Firefox logo and I'm not convinced that it is de minimis... Stefan4 (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Isn't the Firefox logo under a free license? See Mozilla Firefox 3.5 logo 256.png, for example. Jafeluv (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Firefox logo is free JuTa 22:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
The mix of different colours looks very stylistic. Most likely above the threshold of originality of the UK and no evidence of permission for the GNU+CC licences. Stefan4 (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The Threshold of originality in the UK is very low, see COM:TOO#UK. --JD554 (talk) 07:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete agree that this is likely copyrightable in the UK. Jafeluv (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: pr nom and very unlikely realy own work. JuTa 22:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a derivative work of an unidentified map. Stefan4 (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: cpvio from i.e. http://archive.fieldmuseum.org/philippine_mammals/species/SP_66.asp JuTa 22:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
"Source" and "Author" fields seem to contradict each other. Stefan4 (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
![23:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/03/13#c-Stefan4-2012-03-13T23:01:00.000Z-File:"Ramana_Maharishi_with_Kavyakanta_Ganapathi_Muni.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
- As the depicted person died in 1950, the photo is certainly not from 2010 as indicated on the description page. If this was published anonymously before 1950 it would fall under {{PD-India}}, but there's no indication of previous publication or the author's name. If not anonymous, the photograph is likely still under copyright (60 years pma in India). With the information we have, I'm afraid we'll have to be Delete per COM:PCP. Jafeluv (talk) 09:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jafeluv JuTa 22:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
![22:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/03/13#c-JuTa-2012-06-09T22:18:00.000Z-File:"Ramana_Maharishi_with_Kavyakanta_Ganapathi_Muni.jpg".jpg){kind=link}
No evidence of permission but maybe PD-textlogo? Stefan4 (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I think {{PD-textlogo}} can b applied here. JuTa 22:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Screenshots of computer software with unknown licence.
- File:Sprintometer, 3-dimensional burndown chart with statistical prediction.png
- File:Sprintometer, statistical prediction in burndown chart.png
Stefan4 (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: see also en:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sprintometer JuTa 22:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
See en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 March 5#File:YugoslavOrderOfBravery.jpg. Stefan4 (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of possibly non-free content. Americophile 18:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep , According to Iranian "Law for the Protection of Authors, Composers and Artist Rights" , the work belongs to a legal personality ( Museum of Maqbaratoshoara) and the rights are transferred to a legal personality.I ask if it was legal to take a photo and post it in Wikipedia and the Museum accepted and said it would introduce the museum to the public . When in Iran , the photography is allowed in the museums , that means using it is in public domain , otherwise the museum would not allow photography .--Alborz Fallah (talk) 10:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- In this case, please send a permission to OTRS. Americophile 10:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Museums in Iran , does not have a mechanism of giving permissions for publishing images .But as I said , when photography is allowed , that is equivalent to having permissions , In case of contradicting with Iranian law , the authorities does not allow getting the camera in to the museums . I don't think the norm of written permission of western museums can be applied here : Can you show any permission to OTRS in other pictures that are taken in Iranian museums in previous Wiki images ?--Alborz Fallah (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I know that Iran is a strange country but it makes no difference. Iran has a copyright law that nobody cares about it but here on Commons we respect it. Furthermore, photography is not allowed in all of the museums in Iran. Americophile 13:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your respect for Iranian law , but you know , your interpretation of that law may be different from what the authorities think or do inside Iran . Coining their understanding on others is also a problem of western world in dealing with Eastern and Third world . --Alborz Fallah (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Let's be honest. Do you mean to imply that the copyright owner will not bother to sue or will not mind? if so, please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Americophile 14:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- The copyright owner does not consider it as a violation of copyright law , because the Iranian law is different from US law .--Alborz Fallah (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Let's be honest. Do you mean to imply that the copyright owner will not bother to sue or will not mind? if so, please read Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Americophile 14:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your respect for Iranian law , but you know , your interpretation of that law may be different from what the authorities think or do inside Iran . Coining their understanding on others is also a problem of western world in dealing with Eastern and Third world . --Alborz Fallah (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- I know that Iran is a strange country but it makes no difference. Iran has a copyright law that nobody cares about it but here on Commons we respect it. Furthermore, photography is not allowed in all of the museums in Iran. Americophile 13:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Museums in Iran , does not have a mechanism of giving permissions for publishing images .But as I said , when photography is allowed , that is equivalent to having permissions , In case of contradicting with Iranian law , the authorities does not allow getting the camera in to the museums . I don't think the norm of written permission of western museums can be applied here : Can you show any permission to OTRS in other pictures that are taken in Iranian museums in previous Wiki images ?--Alborz Fallah (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- In this case, please send a permission to OTRS. Americophile 10:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that a museum allows photography says nothing about the copyright status -- both because museums often don't bother to know the status and because in most countries, personal use does not infringe. Commons requires freedom for commercial use, which is a very different thing. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Author is 新凤霞（1927－1998), Not PD shizhao (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- keep. This is a soundrecord of a China Film first published in 1956, that never been published in other country. The author was Changchun Film Group Corporation. Singer 新凤霞（1927－1998) was not the copyright holder. Under chinese copyright law :[6]
Chapter II, Section 3 Term of Protection
The term of protection of the right of publication and of the rights provided in Items (5) through (17) of Paragraph 1 of Article 10 of this Law where the copyright belongs to a legal entity or another organization, or in respect of a service work where the legal entity or organization enjoys the copyright (except the right of authorship), shall be fifty years, expiring on December 31 of the fiftieth year after the first publication of such a work, however, any such work that has not been published within fifty years after the completion of its creation shall no longer be protected by this Law.
The term of protection of the right of publication and of the rights provided in Items (5) through (17) of Paragraph 1 of Article 10 of this Law in respect of a cinematographic work or a work created in a way similar to cinematography shall be fifty years, expiring on December 31 of the fiftieth year after the first publication of such a work, however, any such work that has not been published within fifty years after the completion of its creation shall no longer be protected by this Law.
Chapter IV, Section 3 Sound Recording and Video Recording
A producer of sound recordings or video recordings shall have the right to permit others to reproduce, distribute, lease and disseminate to the public through information network such sound recordings or video recordings and shall have the right to receive remuneration for it. The term of protection of such rights shall be fifty years, expiring on December 31 of the fiftieth year after the production of the recording is firstly completed.
--苹果派.留言 17:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: File is apparently unfree. The keep vote does not address whether the file is free or unfree. FASTILY (TALK) 03:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The file was created when we used coat of arms and flags from vector-images.com on Wikimedia Commons. I was co-author of it and an uploader. I could add template about source to it, and in this way it would be deleted with other files long time ago. My bad, I didn't do this when uploading it. It should be speedy deleted, but I think it's a very important file to Wikimedia and maybe somebody will find a free version. I tried my best and I haven't found anything suitable. I'm not even sure if this CoA (not exactly this file) is in public domain. So if somebody would like find a legal status of CoA of Gabon (not exactly this file), I'd be grateful. I'm so sorry about not tagging it correctly and about not noticing earlier (I just forgot about this file). I'm adding one derivative work and one photo, in case if it's copyrighted and there's no freedom of panorama. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- File:Flag_Gabon_President.png - has to be deleted or replaced
- File:LOGOPORTGENTIL.JPG - has to be deleted if there's no freedom of panorama and CoA is copyrighted
- Have the arms redone and RevDel the history. There's no proof it's copyrighted so until that arises, the arms themselves are still Commons material. Fry1989 eh? 03:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's a derivative of the work from vector-images.com and they were deleted. There's no doubt it has to be deleted, the problem is if there's a replacement. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- And there's no proof that's not copyrighted at all. And we don't add image to commons if we aen't sure of its status. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- As I said, we can redo the arms, and RevDel the VI version. This has been done before, examples are the flag of Fiji, and the Seal of Texas, no reason we cant do that here. And we have plenty of coats of arms on here which we're not 100% about the status, but keep based on the principles of COM:COA. Fry1989 eh? 03:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I didn't know about COM:COA. But still I don't know how to redo it - I don't know when it would be derivative and when it would become just inspired. There's a thin line between that. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't have the ability to redo it myself either, but we have several users we can ask who have amazing skills when it comes to vector graphics. Fry1989 eh? 03:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I didn't know about COM:COA. But still I don't know how to redo it - I don't know when it would be derivative and when it would become just inspired. There's a thin line between that. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- As I said, we can redo the arms, and RevDel the VI version. This has been done before, examples are the flag of Fiji, and the Seal of Texas, no reason we cant do that here. And we have plenty of coats of arms on here which we're not 100% about the status, but keep based on the principles of COM:COA. Fry1989 eh? 03:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- And there's no proof that's not copyrighted at all. And we don't add image to commons if we aen't sure of its status. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's a derivative of the work from vector-images.com and they were deleted. There's no doubt it has to be deleted, the problem is if there's a replacement. Herr Kriss (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Have the arms redone and RevDel the history. There's no proof it's copyrighted so until that arises, the arms themselves are still Commons material. Fry1989 eh? 03:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- It seems that someone else thinks they designed this CoA too. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 11:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Doesn't seem to be consensus to delete anything. Though, if someone could redo these images, that'd be great. FASTILY (TALK) 08:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
