Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/05/20
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Obvious manipulated image, no evidence that either source image has a license that permits modification or derivative works. uploaded by single-purpose account and likely sockpuppet of blocked editor at English Wikipedia for use on vandalism article. Zero encyclopedic value. 99.27.138.106 06:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: attack image used for vandalism on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Bartok; ooS Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Obvious manipulated image, no evidence that either source image has a license that permits modification or derivative works. uploaded by single-purpose account and likely sockpuppet of blocked editor at English Wikipedia for use on vandalism article. Zero encyclopedic value. 99.27.138.106 06:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: attack image used for vandalism on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Bartok; ooS Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope ■ MMXX talk 14:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal image. Jujutacular talk 15:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. ■ MMXX talk 15:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope ■ MMXX talk 14:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal image. Jujutacular talk 15:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. ■ MMXX talk 15:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope, no clear source, probably from a TV/video Ad. ■ MMXX talk 16:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Mattbuck. ■ MMXX talk 16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope, no clear source, probably from a TV/video Ad. ■ MMXX talk 16:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Mattbuck. ■ MMXX talk 16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope, no clear source, probably from a TV/video Ad. ■ MMXX talk 16:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Mattbuck. ■ MMXX talk 16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
There's no indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Knud Winckelmann (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CB#Album covers Martin H. (talk) 21:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Too dark to be of any use, too blurry to be of any use, no sourse, no EXIF-data, and what should the picture tell us? Yikrazuul (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Completely replaceable, pretty much unusable. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular talk 14:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular talk 14:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphan that can be created in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular talk 14:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphan that can be created in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular talk 14:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Non free logo. Contains non-text elements to be considered as text-logo. Bluemask (talk) 00:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Speedy deletion as copyvio. Uploader is not the copyholder, thus violating copyright and trademark laws. Tbhotch (talk) 06:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular talk 14:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Jujutacular talk 14:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
The same file is exist; 20101003 daewoo veritas 01.jpg. Chu (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep File:20101003 daewoo veritas 001.jpg and delete File:20101003 daewoo veritas 01.jpg, as the former has the file history preserved. OSX (talk • contributions) 07:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: (and deleted the duplicate as proposed) Jcb (talk) 07:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
The same file is exist; 20101003 daewoo veritas 02.jpg. Chu (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep File:20101003 daewoo veritas 002.jpg and delete File:20101003 daewoo veritas 02.jpg, as the former has the file history preserved. OSX (talk • contributions) 07:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (and deleted the duplicate as proposed) Jcb (talk) 07:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope, much easier to create as a table on projects. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: as long as it is in use, it cannot be deleted for being out of scope Jcb (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo + copyvio Slfi (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
promoting image/out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo Slfi (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope (maybe copyvio - looks like screenshot from movie/TV) Slfi (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope, no author Slfi (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo Slfi (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
private photo Slfi (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
promoting image/ad Slfi (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Book cover without permission. Bad source, bad license. Art-top (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope ■ MMXX talk 17:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
broken svg? not used Avron (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Nope, doesn't work for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:50, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Corrupt file George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
low quality personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
no use. uploaded by the user for hoax on he.wiki 79.181.29.79 18:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Text for wikipedia article but not in commons scope Avron (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Text for wikipedia articles but not in commons scope Avron (talk) 19:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
promotion material, not used Avron (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
It was published under the wrong licensing copyright Ramiejacobson (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
spam for website DS (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope, spam George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Image is low quality and has an inappropriate file format. The strange colored dots surrounding the chemical structure are unnecessary and distracting. Other, better options are available in Category:Thiophenols ChemNerd (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unused (have File:Thiophenol.png among other possible replacements). DMacks (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 10:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 20:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Unused pixelated; replaceable by File:Thiophenol.png among others DMacks (talk) 20:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. --Yikrazuul (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 10:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artowrk, not used Avron (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
no usable quality, not used Avron (talk) 21:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not uesed Avron (talk) 21:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork/no usable quality, not used Avron (talk) 21:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork/no usable quality, not used Avron (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 22:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 22:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
File:BTW Ball 2012.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Although the image was created by its autor, the image contains a copyrighted picture of Lady Gaga. It comes from her single "Born This Way" and unless he is the copyholder of that, this is a copyright violation.
- Delete as nominator. Tbhotch (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator. Podzemnik (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope. A business letter posted for promotion purposes. Also nominating similar letters: File:Otziv_rmsteel.png, File:Otzyv srz.jpg (the latter is direct mail advertizing). The case was discussed earlier at [1]. ~ NVO (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom., promotial content. Podzemnik (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the US for modern art works, unlike Canada or Mexico, Germany or the UK. Leoboudv (talk) 09:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Lymantria (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
File from BBC, no evidence of permission Kafuffle (talk) 10:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission. Podzemnik (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: personal snaps hot used in creation of a non-notable biography on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal image. Podzemnik (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Modern art. Will be good idea to confirm painter identity with Commons:OTRS. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. Podzemnik (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
and File:Eduardo Araujo Miglioli.JPG. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal images. Podzemnik (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
promoting picture or copyvio (probably CD cover) Slfi (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Lymantria (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
obrázek již existuje Tomas.urban (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Keep sice existuje, ale v jiné kvalitě a barevnosti. (image allready exist - but it's not duplicate)--Slfi (talk) 16:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment Tuto kopii bych ponechal (má vyšší kvalitu díky nižší kompresi), smazal bych File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg a následně bych tento soubor nechal přejmenovat na File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg . Co vy na to?
I would keep this copy (thanks to lower compression has higher qualitty) and deleted File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg. Then rename this file to File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg--Slfi (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept, renamed. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
copyvio - photo of photo Slfi (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Podzemnik (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, promotial. Podzemnik (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, promotial. Podzemnik (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Visual style and size of image indicates that it may have come from a web source, rather than from uploader's camera. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Agree, seems like copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Uploader's only edits is on their userpage - self promotion. ■ MMXX talk 17:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotial image. Podzemnik (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
small size, questionable copyrigt, not used Avron (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Text for wikipedia article but not in commons scope Avron (talk) 19:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Commons is not an arXiv. Demmo (talk) 07:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
It comes from a copyrighted book, not a self-work. --苹果派.留言 20:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator. Podzemnik (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
It comes from a copyrighted book, not a self-work. --苹果派.留言 20:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator. Podzemnik (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Derivative work -- Common Good (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Scope? Podzemnik (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
small size, I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder Avron (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Scope? Podzemnik (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
All the other files of this user were copyright violations; I couldn't find this image on the internet, but its features lead me to believe that it was, also, taken from some non-free source, most probably some portuguese government website, because all the other images uploaded by this user were from online documents or websites of the government. Ajpvalente (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It seems like copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Non free logo per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unibersidad_ng_Pilipinas.png Bluemask (talk) 00:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Not simple enough to be ineligible for copyright. Jujutacular talk 14:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Moray An Par (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note:File:University of the Philippines Seal.png and File:Unibersidad ng Pilipinas resized.png are duplicates of this. Moray An Par (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Podzemnik (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Non-free logo per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unibersidad_ng_Pilipinas.png Bluemask (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Claim of threshold of originality is dubious. Moray An Par (talk) 23:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note:File:University of the Philippines Seal.png and File:Unibersidad ng Pilipinas.png are duplicates of this. Moray An Par (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Podzemnik (talk) 08:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Photograph by a living professional photographer (Victor Ahlomov, born 1936, - taken from his 2008 exhibition [2]). No permission = copyvio NVO (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted map from Google Maps André Koehne TALK TO ME 06:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
No source, unused, looks fake. OsamaK 08:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per OsamaK. Out of the project scope. Podzemnik (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
There is a Transformer logo and other pictures that may be copyrighted--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 09:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment This is on the fence for DM. On the one hand, the primary subject is Megan Fox. On the other, everything else is Transformers stuff, and its use on es.wiki is not what DM is intended for. It's a nice photo though; would there be any illustrative value for Megan Fox (if so, crop)? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:02, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. File:Megan Fox promoting Transformers in Paris 7.jpg is nearly an identical image to this one with less Transformers stuff, so no need to keep this questionable/controversial one. --P199 (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK, good, Delete. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per P199, there is this image, which is not so questionable. Podzemnik (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Montage of unfree content, the logo, the blue dragon and the background photo are all not self-created. Possibly not even the montage is self-created. Martin H. (talk) 13:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Majority of the image is a non-free logo: en:File:F.C. Porto logo.png. Jujutacular talk 14:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Likely a copyvio, see tineye results.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, thats the evidence for my claim that possibly not even the montage is self-created. --Martin H. (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- It has the looks of an Hi5 creation, probably to be used as a background for profiles. Those things are created by user X, and then spread without control to anyone who stumbles upon some profile using it and wants to use the same background.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, thats the evidence for my claim that possibly not even the montage is self-created. --Martin H. (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted High Contrast (talk) 08:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Essentially a duplicate of the better image: File:East Banqueting Wool Church Chipping Campden.jpg Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted, you can use {{Duplicate}} next time. Podzemnik (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Author is stated to be the subject of the image. Neither is the uploader. We need to know who actually took the photo and have permssion from him or her. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Agree. Deleted. Podzemnik (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
and File:Av cap indio bandeira.jpg. Unlikely to by own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Taken from the internet, for example http://www.tribunadointerior.com.br/mourao/noticias/3286/?noticia=parana-supermercados-inaugura-nova-loja (published November 13, 2010). Bad uploader. --Martin H. (talk) 16:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- And the second image is grabbed from http://www.flickr.com/photos/93934155@N00/3877712819/ or a page reusing this photo, e.g. this blog. Eugene, you have a good nose for such copyvios. --Martin H. (talk) 16:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. Copyvios. Podzemnik (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Hoihoi61 (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion, probably copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 07:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
le programme de maquillage comment enseigner Lapiplek (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jcb (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted logo, sourced from page with "© 2011 Mediacorp Canada Inc." Gobonobo (talk) 19:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}. (Also, the Free Art License is completely wrong and should be corrected to this.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Apparently a photo of a public(?) map - but as there is no FOP in Belgium it is a DW except if the map is public domain for some reason not explained by the uploader. Saibo (Δ) 02:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
ja tak chcę Paweł1995 (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why? / Dlaczego? --Podzemnik (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Podzemnik (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Zbyt wiele wersji tego pliku Werda (talk) 11:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Question So you just want to keep the original one? (Also, you should rename it by placing the template {{Rename}} on it.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: There is no valid reason for deletion, isn´t it? Podzemnik (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Apparently a photo of a public(?) map - but as there is no FOP in Belgium it is a DW except if the map is public domain for some reason not explained by the uploader. Saibo (Δ) 02:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Trycatch (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Non-free photo (source says © Архангельская областная научная библиотека им.Н.А.Добролюбова [3]). Also, although the primary work may qualify for {{PD-RusEmpire}}, it's not PD-Old-70 - author died in 1971 - and not 2-dimensional - wrong license. NVO (talk) 02:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC) NVO (talk) 02:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Trycatch (talk) 19:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
No clear subject. Poor quality. Unusable. Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 10:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- According to the description and upload File:Volcano1.jpg it appears to be some self-created painting / watercolor painting? Out of scope. Maybe the 24 deleted edits in zh.wp can give more information. --Martin H. (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF tags Dereckson (talk) 17:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. A previous debate kept this image on the good faith principe on fr.wikipedia : fr:Wikipédia:Images à supprimer/Fichier:Jaca.jpg. --Dereckson (talk) 17:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. If someone wishes to ask the original uploader a permission, he enabled mail through fr:Spécial:Envoyer_un_courriel/Didierklodawski. --Dereckson (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. This photograph comes from [4] who specifies "© DK 2003 - 2011". Rémih (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Well it is his name on the copyright notice, and he who originally uploaded it at fr.wiki. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be a good user contributing under his real name, the copyright notice fits to the name of the user. Lack of EXIF tags doesn't mean much by itself -- some users for whatever reason prefer to contribute low-res versions (and this is exactly the case -- see w:fr:File:Hippolyte.jpg). I don't see a problem at all. Trycatch (talk) 20:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
without a source as of 24 April 2011 Pierrot de Lioncourt カバー!!!カバー!!! 07:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment There is source {{Own}}, so where is the problem? --Podzemnik (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- All this user's uploads are dubiously sourced: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=53796922#Review – Adrignola talk 16:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Orphan with better version available Bender2k14 (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Someone reverted one of the edits where I replaced this image with its superior SVG version. I am trying to determine why they reverted. Bender2k14 (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- All good. They just wanted to the SVG to be as large as the PNG was, so I set the size parameter appropriately. Bender2k14 (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Demmo (talk) 07:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: the existence of a vector version is insufficient reason to delete the raster version Jcb (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
A newer UN file, not suitable for {{PD-UN}}. Is this simple enough for {{PD-ineligible}}? JuTa 21:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:PRP. INeverCry 21:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Wrong licence MetaDesign (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Wrong licence MetaDesign (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: fixed Jcb (talk) 10:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Rotate 90 degrees clockwise, if not possible delete and I will upload a better one CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept, I fixed the problem for you. Next time please visit the graphic lab for image corrections instead. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Apex union
[edit]out of scope (copyvio???) --Slfi (talk) 16:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Was uploaded as part of a series amid several copyvios with fraudulent "own work" claims; known unreliable uploader, likely copyvio Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- This is a personal attack, i can't take it serious. Please stop those attacks. --Vinie007 (talk) 10:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Are you denying the "own work" claims on File:Train in Albania.jpg, File:Tirana beer.png, en:File:Tirana City Cirkus.jpg and en:File:Shemsi Beqiri.jpg were fraudulent? Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- I am discussing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albanian bear.jpg, if you have an other case to dicuss, please message me --Vinie007 (talk) 15:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Are you denying the "own work" claims on File:Train in Albania.jpg, File:Tirana beer.png, en:File:Tirana City Cirkus.jpg and en:File:Shemsi Beqiri.jpg were fraudulent? Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept: no reason provided why this image would be copyvio Jcb (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
They don't use this tenue anymore Olivier Bommel (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: invalid deletion reason Jcb (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Incorrect Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Kept. I would have deleted this if I had closed the first DR, but I do not believe we should be reopening DRs on images that are not copyvios and for which there is no practical reason to delete. Admins delete one thousand images a day. Eight of us do half of that. I object to wasting time by arguing at length about minor issues like this one. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
They don't use this tenue anymore Olivier Bommel (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: invalid deletion reason Jcb (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Incorrect Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment please give more details, admins have enough to do -- πϵρήλιο(℗) 16:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Kept. I would have deleted this if I had closed the first DR, but I do not believe we should be reopening DRs on images that are not copyvios and for which there is no practical reason to delete. Admins delete one thousand images a day. Eight of us do half of that. I object to wasting time by arguing at length about minor issues like this one. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)