Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/05/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 20th, 2011
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious manipulated image, no evidence that either source image has a license that permits modification or derivative works. uploaded by single-purpose account and likely sockpuppet of blocked editor at English Wikipedia for use on vandalism article. Zero encyclopedic value. 99.27.138.106 06:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: attack image used for vandalism on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Bartok; ooS Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious manipulated image, no evidence that either source image has a license that permits modification or derivative works. uploaded by single-purpose account and likely sockpuppet of blocked editor at English Wikipedia for use on vandalism article. Zero encyclopedic value. 99.27.138.106 06:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: attack image used for vandalism on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_Bartok; ooS Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope   ■ MMXX  talk  14:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.   ■ MMXX  talk  15:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope   ■ MMXX  talk  14:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom.   ■ MMXX  talk  15:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, no clear source, probably from a TV/video Ad.   ■ MMXX  talk  16:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Mattbuck.   ■ MMXX  talk  16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, no clear source, probably from a TV/video Ad.   ■ MMXX  talk  16:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Mattbuck.   ■ MMXX  talk  16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, no clear source, probably from a TV/video Ad.   ■ MMXX  talk  16:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Mattbuck.   ■ MMXX  talk  16:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Knud Winckelmann (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CB#Album covers Martin H. (talk) 21:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark to be of any use, too blurry to be of any use, no sourse, no EXIF-data, and what should the picture tell us? Yikrazuul (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Completely replaceable, pretty much unusable. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan that can be created in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan that can be created in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 20:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo. Contains non-text elements to be considered as text-logo. Bluemask (talk) 00:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Speedy deletion as copyvio. Uploader is not the copyholder, thus violating copyright and trademark laws. Tbhotch (talk) 06:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan that can be created in HTML or in math tags Bender2k14 (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same file is exist; 20101003 daewoo veritas 01.jpg. Chu (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Keep File:20101003 daewoo veritas 001.jpg and delete File:20101003 daewoo veritas 01.jpg, as the former has the file history preserved. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: (and deleted the duplicate as proposed) Jcb (talk) 07:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same file is exist; 20101003 daewoo veritas 02.jpg. Chu (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:20101003 daewoo veritas 002.jpg and delete File:20101003 daewoo veritas 02.jpg, as the former has the file history preserved. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: (and deleted the duplicate as proposed) Jcb (talk) 07:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, much easier to create as a table on projects. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as long as it is in use, it cannot be deleted for being out of scope Jcb (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo + copyvio Slfi (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promoting image/out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Slfi (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Slfi (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (maybe copyvio - looks like screenshot from movie/TV) Slfi (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no author Slfi (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Slfi (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private photo Slfi (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promoting image/ad Slfi (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover without permission. Bad source, bad license. Art-top (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope   ■ MMXX  talk  17:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

broken svg? not used Avron (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Corrupt file George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no use. uploaded by the user for hoax on he.wiki 79.181.29.79 18:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text for wikipedia article but not in commons scope Avron (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text for wikipedia articles but not in commons scope Avron (talk) 19:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotion material, not used Avron (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was published under the wrong licensing copyright Ramiejacobson (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam for website DS (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope, spam George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is low quality and has an inappropriate file format. The strange colored dots surrounding the chemical structure are unnecessary and distracting. Other, better options are available in Category:Thiophenols ChemNerd (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 10:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 20:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pixelated; replaceable by File:Thiophenol.png among others DMacks (talk) 20:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 10:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artowrk, not used Avron (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no usable quality, not used Avron (talk) 21:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not uesed Avron (talk) 21:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork/no usable quality, not used Avron (talk) 21:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork/no usable quality, not used Avron (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 22:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 22:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BTW Ball 2012.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Although the image was created by its autor, the image contains a copyrighted picture of Lady Gaga. It comes from her single "Born This Way" and unless he is the copyholder of that, this is a copyright violation.

 Delete as nominator. Tbhotch (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nominator. Podzemnik (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. A business letter posted for promotion purposes. Also nominating similar letters: File:Otziv_rmsteel.png, File:Otzyv srz.jpg (the latter is direct mail advertizing). The case was discussed earlier at [1]. ~ NVO (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom., promotial content. Podzemnik (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the US for modern art works, unlike Canada or Mexico, Germany or the UK. Leoboudv (talk) 09:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Lymantria (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File from BBC, no evidence of permission Kafuffle (talk) 10:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission. Podzemnik (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal snaps hot used in creation of a non-notable biography on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image. Podzemnik (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. Will be good idea to confirm painter identity with Commons:OTRS. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. Podzemnik (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Eduardo Araujo Miglioli.JPG. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal images. Podzemnik (talk) 21:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promoting picture or copyvio (probably CD cover) Slfi (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Lymantria (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obrázek již existuje Tomas.urban (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep sice existuje, ale v jiné kvalitě a barevnosti. (image allready exist - but it's not duplicate)--Slfi (talk) 16:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Tuto kopii bych ponechal (má vyšší kvalitu díky nižší kompresi), smazal bych File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg a následně bych tento soubor nechal přejmenovat na File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg . Co vy na to?

I would keep this copy (thanks to lower compression has higher qualitty) and deleted File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg. Then rename this file to File:Biskup_Vrana_Josef.jpg--Slfi (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, renamed. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - photo of photo Slfi (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Podzemnik (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, promotial. Podzemnik (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Slfi (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, promotial. Podzemnik (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visual style and size of image indicates that it may have come from a web source, rather than from uploader's camera. Huntster (t @ c) 17:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agree, seems like copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's only edits is on their userpage - self promotion.   ■ MMXX  talk  17:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promotial image. Podzemnik (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, questionable copyrigt, not used Avron (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text for wikipedia article but not in commons scope Avron (talk) 19:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 22:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It comes from a copyrighted book, not a self-work. --苹果派.留言 20:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator. Podzemnik (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It comes from a copyrighted book, not a self-work. --苹果派.留言 20:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator. Podzemnik (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work -- Common Good (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Podzemnik (talk) 21:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? not used Avron (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 21:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scope? Podzemnik (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder Avron (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scope? Podzemnik (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

All the other files of this user were copyright violations; I couldn't find this image on the internet, but its features lead me to believe that it was, also, taken from some non-free source, most probably some portuguese government website, because all the other images uploaded by this user were from online documents or websites of the government. Ajpvalente (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It seems like copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unibersidad_ng_Pilipinas.png Bluemask (talk) 00:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note:File:University of the Philippines Seal.png and File:Unibersidad ng Pilipinas resized.png are duplicates of this. Moray An Par (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Podzemnik (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unibersidad_ng_Pilipinas.png Bluemask (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Claim of threshold of originality is dubious. Moray An Par (talk) 23:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note:File:University of the Philippines Seal.png and File:Unibersidad ng Pilipinas.png are duplicates of this. Moray An Par (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Podzemnik (talk) 08:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph by a living professional photographer (Victor Ahlomov, born 1936, - taken from his 2008 exhibition [2]). No permission = copyvio NVO (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted map from Google Maps André Koehne TALK TO ME 06:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Podzemnik (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unused, looks fake. OsamaK 08:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per OsamaK. Out of the project scope. Podzemnik (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a Transformer logo and other pictures that may be copyrighted--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 09:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per P199, there is this image, which is not so questionable. Podzemnik (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Montage of unfree content, the logo, the blue dragon and the background photo are all not self-created. Possibly not even the montage is self-created. Martin H. (talk) 13:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted High Contrast (talk) 08:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Essentially a duplicate of the better image: File:East Banqueting Wool Church Chipping Campden.jpg Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted, you can use {{Duplicate}} next time. Podzemnik (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is stated to be the subject of the image. Neither is the uploader. We need to know who actually took the photo and have permssion from him or her.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agree. Deleted. Podzemnik (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Av cap indio bandeira.jpg. Unlikely to by own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from the internet, for example http://www.tribunadointerior.com.br/mourao/noticias/3286/?noticia=parana-supermercados-inaugura-nova-loja (published November 13, 2010). Bad uploader. --Martin H. (talk) 16:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And the second image is grabbed from http://www.flickr.com/photos/93934155@N00/3877712819/ or a page reusing this photo, e.g. this blog. Eugene, you have a good nose for such copyvios. --Martin H. (talk) 16:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Copyvios. Podzemnik (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and other uploads by Hoihoi61 (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion, probably copyvio. Podzemnik (talk) 07:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le programme de maquillage comment enseigner Lapiplek (talk) 15:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Jcb (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo, sourced from page with "© 2011 Mediacorp Canada Inc." Gobonobo (talk) 19:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a photo of a public(?) map - but as there is no FOP in Belgium it is a DW except if the map is public domain for some reason not explained by the uploader. Saibo (Δ) 02:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jcb (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ja tak chcę Paweł1995 (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? / Dlaczego? --Podzemnik (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Podzemnik (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zbyt wiele wersji tego pliku Werda (talk) 11:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There is no valid reason for deletion, isn´t it? Podzemnik (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a photo of a public(?) map - but as there is no FOP in Belgium it is a DW except if the map is public domain for some reason not explained by the uploader. Saibo (Δ) 02:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Trycatch (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo (source says © Архангельская областная научная библиотека им.Н.А.Добролюбова [3]). Also, although the primary work may qualify for {{PD-RusEmpire}}, it's not PD-Old-70 - author died in 1971 - and not 2-dimensional - wrong license. NVO (talk) 02:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC) NVO (talk) 02:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Trycatch (talk) 19:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear subject. Poor quality. Unusable. Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 10:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to the description and upload File:Volcano1.jpg it appears to be some self-created painting / watercolor painting? Out of scope. Maybe the 24 deleted edits in zh.wp can give more information. --Martin H. (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF tags Dereckson (talk) 17:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without a source as of 24 April 2011 Pierrot de Lioncourt カバー!!!カバー!!! 07:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment There is source {{Own}}, so where is the problem? --Podzemnik (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All this user's uploads are dubiously sourced: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=53796922#Review – Adrignola talk 16:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no permission. Yann (talk) 07:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan with better version available Bender2k14 (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone reverted one of the edits where I replaced this image with its superior SVG version. I am trying to determine why they reverted. Bender2k14 (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All good. They just wanted to the SVG to be as large as the PNG was, so I set the size parameter appropriately. Bender2k14 (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the existence of a vector version is insufficient reason to delete the raster version Jcb (talk) 13:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A newer UN file, not suitable for {{PD-UN}}. Is this simple enough for {{PD-ineligible}}? JuTa 21:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per COM:PRP. INeverCry 21:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong licence MetaDesign (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong licence MetaDesign (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed Jcb (talk) 10:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Rotate 90 degrees clockwise, if not possible delete and I will upload a better one CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I fixed the problem for you. Next time please visit the graphic lab for image corrections instead. King of 11:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apex union

[edit]

out of scope (copyvio???) --Slfi (talk) 16:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was uploaded as part of a series amid several copyvios with fraudulent "own work" claims; known unreliable uploader, likely copyvio Fut.Perf. 19:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a personal attack, i can't take it serious. Please stop those attacks. --Vinie007 (talk) 10:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are you denying the "own work" claims on File:Train in Albania.jpg, File:Tirana beer.png, en:File:Tirana City Cirkus.jpg and en:File:Shemsi Beqiri.jpg were fraudulent? Fut.Perf. 17:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am discussing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albanian bear.jpg, if you have an other case to dicuss, please message me --Vinie007 (talk) 15:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason provided why this image would be copyvio Jcb (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

They don't use this tenue anymore Olivier Bommel (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: invalid deletion reason Jcb (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Incorrect Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. I would have deleted this if I had closed the first DR, but I do not believe we should be reopening DRs on images that are not copyvios and for which there is no practical reason to delete. Admins delete one thousand images a day. Eight of us do half of that. I object to wasting time by arguing at length about minor issues like this one.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

They don't use this tenue anymore Olivier Bommel (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: invalid deletion reason Jcb (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Incorrect Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment please give more details, admins have enough to do -- πϵρήλιο() 16:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. I would have deleted this if I had closed the first DR, but I do not believe we should be reopening DRs on images that are not copyvios and for which there is no practical reason to delete. Admins delete one thousand images a day. Eight of us do half of that. I object to wasting time by arguing at length about minor issues like this one.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]