Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/12/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
There is no such chemical compound. It was created for a hoax page on the Portuguese Wikipedia (w:pt:Denestatovir) and should be deleted. 96.227.89.95 00:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete 0 Google hits (except the Wikipedia related ones). --Leyo 10:30, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 04:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded this file, but now understand it to be undercopyright. Please remove it. Obscurasky (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 04:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I uploaded this file, but now understand it to be undercopyright. Please remove it Obscurasky (talk) 01:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 03:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Image will never be used. Article on en-wiki deleted and salted for epic lack of notability. No other wiki could concievabally ever want or need this image. Commons is not a free image hosting service. Sven Manguard (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 04:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
1984 photo, seems to be scanned. Belgrano (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- so what? Author scanned his old photos, so what is wrong? --Алый Король (talk) 02:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Keep for reason given by Алый Король. A Google search did not turn up the image, so unlikely to be pulled off the Internet. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept per above. I don't see anything suspicious with this picture taken with Olympus OM-2. Trycatch (talk) 14:39, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Out of scope; no definable use on any wiki projects, I could create the same logo and claim it my own. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Out of scope; not used on any wiki projects, simple construction and design that is easily replaceable (see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kreyg.png). :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
the copyright on the picture is not compatible with the GFDL and CC-by license -- Badener 05:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: copyright statement was added by uploader. Copyright holders retain the copyrights in their images when they license them under GFDL and CC licences, so the copyright statement is compatible with the licences. However, it is against policy to have such statements in images, so I have tagged the image with {{Watermark}}. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- The picture without watermark is existing (File:Obermorschwiller retouched.jpg) but as I understand the watermark-template it should have the same name and should be uploade instead if this one, not also. -- Badener 21:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: OK, I have uploaded "File:Obermorschwiller retouched.jpg" over "File:Obermorschwiller.JPG", and tagged "Obermorschwiller retouched.jpg" with {{Duplicate}}. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks! -- Badener 12:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)!
- The picture without watermark is existing (File:Obermorschwiller retouched.jpg) but as I understand the watermark-template it should have the same name and should be uploade instead if this one, not also. -- Badener 21:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Geagea (talk) 22:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Too small to be useful. A personal photo. 134.96.231.113 09:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 04:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Retrato de Felipe IV en armadura, by Diego Velázquez.jpg, not worth keeping. Martin H. (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: current image is not useful for any project as better quality image is available. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Scaled-down poor duplicate, unused now George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
I have inadvertently loaded the image on its side ( first contribution) and don't know how to rotate it 90 degree anti clockwise... Sullivanthepoet (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep: next time, tag the image with {{Rotate}} as I have done. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 17:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Profoundest thanks Jack... I'm new here and still working it all out... As it doesn't now need deleting - is there something I can do to withdraw the request? Or should I let it ride to wipe out the 'dodgy' one?
- There isn't any "dodgy" version as it has been replaced by the corrected version. There isn't any way to withdraw a deletion request. An administrator will come along shortly and close the discussion. Feel free to ask questions at "Commons:Village pump". — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 09:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Jack you're a star... Many thanks for your help.
By mistake, I put a wrong name Diablo Cojuelo (talk) 10:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: derivative work book cover – insufficient evidence that book cover is in the public domain. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Per Commons:Image casebook#Book covers. ZooFari 05:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Copy from the city's website [1] - defenitely not by Thomas Thumann Eingangskontrolle (talk) 11:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
![[1]](http://www.neumarkt.de/index.php?eID=tx_cms_showpic&file=uploads%2Fpics%2FPassfoto_zur_Weitergabe_31.01.08_03.jpg&title=Image&width=800m&height=600m&bodyTag=%3Cbody+bgcolor%3D%22%23FFFFFF%22%3E&wrap=%3Ca+href%3D%22javascript%3Aclose%28%29%3B%22%3E+%7C+%3C%2Fa%3E%3Cbr%3E%3Cfont+face%3D%22arial%22+size%3D%221%22%3E%3C%2Ffont%3E&md5=ea59a50a0610408a7938735e8b04ec77){kind=link}
- Delete: copyright violation. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. by User:Yann.Geagea (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Incorrect structure (compare PubChem or ChemIDplus); replaced by File:Lanepitant.png. Leyo 12:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Without any doubt. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 15:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
I doubt the authorship of this photo. The original ruwiki uploader has a long track record of copivios (see his local talk page or Commons:Deletion requests/File:UAZ Hunter 3.jpg for example), resolution is low, several TinEye hits (though I couldn't establish which photo was earlier). Blacklake (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Trycatch (talk) 16:15, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio. The low-res photo was uploaded in ruwiki by a newbie and PD-self tag was added later by a user, completely ignorant of image licensing. Blacklake (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Trycatch (talk) 16:16, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Its licenced on panoramico as non-commercial use only and that, apparently, is not acceptable for commons. Calistemon (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've replaced the file with a non-copyrighted version, created by myself. Please ignore the deletion request. Calistemon (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
copyrighted version deleted Kept. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
picture is a hoax, and added to the article and is not the subject, see discussion at enwiki BLP noticeboard - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Artel_Jarod_Walker Off2riorob (talk) 14:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete not sure if it's a hoax or a mistake, but its a BLP issue, so better safe. The en.wp thread says it all.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete definitely a hoax perpetrated by en-wiki editor User:Phrasia/User:CenterfoldSally. See the BLPN discussion linked to above for further details. --Ponyo (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Keep You people are ape nuts, the picture is obviously the same man that is on the imdb profile. 173.51.244.175 07:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but the person in this picture[2] is not the same man as pictured at the awards ceremony.[3] IMDB has been affected by the same hoax. Fences and windows (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Hoax image, also affecting IMDB. Fences and windows (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 20:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Drive-by uploader, low resolution, no metadata. Further, if the uploader DID take the photo for a portfolio, it seems unlikely they would retain copyright. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Agree, it looks cut and copied from somewhere. As Matt says portfolio pics unlikely the photographer would retain copyright. Off2riorob (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. --Màñü飆¹5 talk 20:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Fair-use not allowed. Yann (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Far out of project scope self-promotional unused animated logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Far out of project scope. Unusable poor private drawing George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Very poor and unusable small duplicate of File:Tr-book.jpg George Chernilevsky talk 16:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete for nominator's reason. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope private drawing George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Unusable poor photo of computer screen with not defined software. Far out of project scope. George Chernilevsky talk 16:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete description says "pic taken from online with camera for the purpose off project"; so why was it uploaded here? Also, wallpaper is presumably still copyrighted.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009 George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009 George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
It appears to not be the copyright holders work and is unlicensed, see [4] David Fuchs (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- The pic was a very very lucky find at the back of a junk shop w/o artist info. It was in a century frame and had been there ('cording to the antique lady in question) for twenty-odd years. So I'm guessing it's from the seventies or eighties; but then again it could have been taken last winter.
- It's so beautiful I just couldn't pass up the attempt to upload. Delete away if you must. (Or perhaps find the original photographer?) -- Marskell
- Delete: Speedy delete, crop of commercial photograph copyrighted to Art Wolfe.[5] Jappalang (talk) 08:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Far out of project scope. Private photo with self-promotion. George Chernilevsky talk 17:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009. George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009 George Chernilevsky talk 17:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009 George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009 George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009 George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Unusable poor photo, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and uncategorized since 2009. Very poor quality George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Tiny drawing, unused and unusable for a project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Tiny drawing, unused and unusable for a project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete for nominator's reason. Commons is not a personal file server. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 17:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unusable small and poor George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 17:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Unused private logo. Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 17:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009, source? 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009, violating personal rights 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and unusably too small George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 05:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
should not be free use Freya1993 (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Non-free logo, uploader request. --Martin H. (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyright violation http://selec.sk/v-tame-v-s-na-str-nkach-obce-selec/ - © 2009 Obecný úrad Selec. Chiak (talk) 18:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Exact file URL: http://selec.sk/assets/vseobecne/panb.jpg --Chiak (talk) 18:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- I added {{subst:npd}} but no Slovak (Slovenčina: (missing text)) translation of this template. Geagea (talk) 22:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope, not used or categorized since 12/2009 4028mdk09 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
out of project scope. Private photo. Unused and unusably too small George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Not submitter's own work as claimed. A tineye.com reverse image search shows it is widepsread on the web. 71.48.137.163 19:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo Secret (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
No evidence of permission by author/copyright owner. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey Morbidthoughts. What do you mean? It is its page. It has made a photo. Where its interdiction for this photo? You it it? Place other photo. With best regards. 22:00 14 December 2010
- Did Danica give you permission to upload her picture to the Commons and release it to the public domain? Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- )OK.Twitter or Myspace public domains???...To remove page? 0:24 16 December 2010
- No, Twitter and Myspace is not the public domain. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
OK.If it is not difficult.Please find its photo in the public domain. It is impossible to me.The page should have a photo.You after all understand it, as the photographer....Or remove page.Ths.Johnsmith877 (talk12:25,16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Need OTRS-permission, so delete--Motopark (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Then let will be...Johnsmith877 (talk)00:55,18 December 2010
- Need OTRS-permission, so delete--Motopark (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Is this image a Flickrwash as Wknight states (and I think) in the image history? There aren't many images on this flickr source account of people and most aren't concentrated on this single person. What does the community think? Leoboudv (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete, flickr washing. --Martin H. (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hi every on .. this images are not Flickrwash. Just received from the owner amenda edirisinghe a sri lankan model. Can give her contact to verify.... And this Photos are not been released to the net before. please do not delete. --Darshana3d (talk · contribs). (Moved from talk page) --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Comment I reiterate my delete vote. Please view the small image resolution. This hints at a flickrwash. Even basic flickr accounts had a higher resolution of 1024 X 783 pixels thereabouts. This needs COM:OTRS permission I think and there is nothing. No evidence the flickr account source owner is the real photographer or holds the image's rights unfortunately. This is a derivative, for instance. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I agree we need a OTRS permission to keep this photo. --MGA73 (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Per the comments above - OTRS will be needed to host this image, thanks Herby talk thyme 08:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
out of scope 78.50.145.157 21:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. by User:Yann. Geagea (talk) 22:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Also the smaller version File:Mejorguajira2.gif.
Appears to be promotional/spam in intent for a website. Out of scope. BrokenSphere (Talk) 21:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Blatant advertisement George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
This is not the own work of the uploader. No evidence, no EXIF, only image by uploader 80.187.107.74 22:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Uploaded under copyrighted free use license - No evidence that uploader is copyright holder or that copyright owner has released the photo for free use - source is listed both as website [6] (which does not state a source or the copyright status of the photo and also from a book (Gunston, Bill & Wood, Tony - Hitler's Luftwaffe, 1977, Salamander Books Ltd., London) Nigel Ish (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:42, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Artwork by Brusilov Alexander
[edit]- File:Арагонская хота 2001 х.м. 65х80.jpg
- File:Каталонский танец сардана. 2001 х.м. 70х90.jpg
- File:Масленница 1999 х.м. 92х114.JPG
- File:Русский танец 2001 х.м. 73х92.JPG
- File:Фламенко 1999 х.м. 81х65.jpg
- File:Шествие Гигантов в Барселоне 2004 х.м.81х100.jpg
- File:Старый Таллин 1978 картон смеш.техника 66х59.JPG
- File:Башни Ростовского Кремля 1973 к.смеш.техника 61х69.JPG
- File:Девушка в узорном платке 1991 х.м. 61х50.jpg
- File:Дед Григорий 1994 х.м. 80х60.JPG
Artwork by Brusilov Alexander (born 1938). --Geagea (talk) 01:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Permission required to host files. ZooFari 04:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Files of User:Dorjee
[edit]- File:Recherche1.jpg
- File:Recherche2.jpg
- File:Wikispot-screenshot.png
- File:Wikispot-logo.png
- File:Visualisation.jpg
- File:Logo-wikispot.jpg
All files are unused screenshots and logos of wikispot, a website with no notability as decided here fr:Discussion:Wikispot/Suppression; many were invalidated by the uploader him/herself - advertising, unusable, out of scope. --Santosga (talk) 02:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. per nom George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
there is two delete the bottom one Najibahmed1 (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: unused personal photograph. Commons is not a personal file server. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
there is two delete the bottom one Najibahmed1 (talk) 20:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Transcluded user signatures
[edit]- User:Rdsmith4/sig
- User:Omegatron/sig
- User:Martijn/sig
- User:Emil76/sig
- User:っ/sig
- User:Rdsmith4/Sig
- User:Doodledoo/Sig
- User:Phlox/Sig
- User:Ananda/sig
- User:Jeff G./sig
- User:Beta m common/sig
- User:Walter Humala/Best sig
- User:-Strogoff-/Signature
- User:Artem Karimov/Signature
- User:Liangent/Signature
- User:Redline/signature
- User:Hucz/Signature
- User:Warregubbi/Signature
- User:Krinkle/Signature
- User:Blast/signature
- User:SanZel/signature
- User:Orem/signature
- User:ColdShine/Signature
- User:Husky/Signature
- User:J+/signature
- User:Marcushsu/signature
- User:Eequor/Signature/Syllabic
- User:Kameraad Pjotr/signature2
- User:Hucz/Signature 2
User:Upior polnocy/signature- User:Labberté K.J./Signature
- User:Zzebah punk/Private/Signature
(Substitute and) delete per Commons:Signatures#Transclusion of templates. --Leyo 15:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - May want to contact COM:BWR for automated substitution. I didn't realize I still had a sig in use, I switched to normal (direct) wikitext a while ago. –Krinkletalk 15:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Commons:Signatures is totally new for me. This so called doesn't seem to have a lot of support. Using such a new proposal to try to get a lot of signatures deleted is a bit strange. Multichill (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - This policy has never been voted on, and thus is "null and void". And besides, nowhere in the policy is stated that the signatures have to be deleted, they only have to be substituted, which makes this an invalid DR as well. Kameraad Pjotr 19:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- To me it is so clear that no templates should be used in signatures, that the (local) guideline would even not be necessary. I just waited with any action while the proposal was pending.
- @Multichill: You seem to have a bad memory, sorry. Commons:Signatures was a topic three times on village pump during the past six month. The interest of users in contributing to the policy was limited, unfortunately. --Leyo 21:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Not "null and void" - a guideline does not need to be created by counting green circles or such. There have been plenty of endorsement elsewhere (the proposal originated in the admins' board) and lack of opposition also contributes to the born of a guideline. However, I agree that the templates not need to be deleted, but they do need to be substituted and the users need to be asked to do so (or change the sig entirely). ZooFari 23:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I am quite shocked that sth has become "an official guideline" without information of those, whom it may concern, that is I believe that all users mentioned should have been noticed BEFORE voting on this guideline. What about another user-templates on file pages? Upior polnocy (talk) 23:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Since yours is used only for file page purposes, the guideline does not apply. In this case it can be striked from the list. ZooFari 00:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Mine is ONLY for file page purposes, I would never use it in discussion. So, AFAIU, it may remain? Upior polnocy (talk) 01:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I have now striked it off the list. ZooFari 01:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I do not agree. There is just no use of not substituting this template. --Leyo 17:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have not transcluded mine since early June 2007. I have removed all evidence of transcluding it except on protected User talk:Polarlys/Archiv1, for which I have a pending edit request at User talk:Polarlys#Edit_request. I stopped because of the discussion now archived at Commons:Village pump/Archive/2007Jun#Edit_summary_reminder, in which my transclusion of it (called "template-sig" and questioned by pfctdayelise), was commented upon as follows (without some of the indentation). — Jeff G. ツ 04:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
| “ |
|
” |
- Thank you, Jeff. I substituted the template in User talk:Polarlys/Archiv1. --Leyo 08:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - My signature (at User:Blast/signature—could this be moved, as a side note?) needs to be subst'd to work to begin with. Octane 20.12.10 1604 (UTC)
- Comment - My signature is only use in file description, and NOT in talk pages. Therefore, as Upior polnocy's (see upside), it shall be deleted from this list, no ? ---Strogoff- (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- IMO your signature template should be substituted, also in file description pages. Some of the reasons that concern talk pages do also apply to file description pages (e.g. target for vandalism). --Leyo 17:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Kept. - there's no need to delete those templates, the just need to be substituted - Jcb (talk) 12:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK, then please initiate it as the admin having decided here. --Leyo 12:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Uploads of Riccardo Gioja
[edit]- File:Indiana metropolitana.jpg
- File:Le tre Civette.jpg
- File:Sottile Ambiguità.jpg
- File:Doppia Personalità.jpg
All are works by Italian artist it:Bastiano da Montalbano who is still alive. No proof that da Montalbano has licensed these paintings under a free license. --BrokenSphere (Talk) 22:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)