Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/10/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
file is corrupted 132.199.33.92 12:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Je suis désolée, mais je ne comprends pas le motif : "file is corrupted". C'est une photo prise par un utilisateur très sérieux de wikipedia en galicien, par ailleurs en Espagne il n'y pas de problème de panorama. Je voudrais comprendre pourquoi on demande la suppression et éventuellement arranger ce qui n'est pas conforme. Merci de bien vouloir m'aiderElvire (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- J'ai mis le marqueur de la licence correcte (conforme à celle de l'auteur sur WPgl). Est-ce suffisant pour conserver l'image, ou y-a-t-il un autre problème ? Elvire (talk) 12:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Je suis désolée, mais je ne comprends pas le motif : "file is corrupted". C'est une photo prise par un utilisateur très sérieux de wikipedia en galicien, par ailleurs en Espagne il n'y pas de problème de panorama. Je voudrais comprendre pourquoi on demande la suppression et éventuellement arranger ce qui n'est pas conforme. Merci de bien vouloir m'aiderElvire (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Now fixed. To the nominator: you nominated the file 3 minutes after it was uploaded, and the problem was fixed one minute later; try giving it more time, or contacting the uploader when it's a recent file instead of jumping straight to a DR. –Tryphon☂ 14:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
CK-Homer.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
CK-Homer.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of "Homer Simpson" which is a copyrighted character 132.199.33.92 11:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
CK-Homer.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted as copyvio. Tabercil (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
CK-Homer.jpeg){kind=link}
copyright violation 132.199.211.47 14:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete "All rights reserved" on flickr: falsely tagged with a flickr commons template; perpetrator should be blocked. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Abigor: In category Copyright violations; not edited for 0 days
Personnal pic, unused Abujoy (talk) 15:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Kept The image is in use and thus scope. Multichill (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
The CC-license can't be found on www.gva.be. Probably copyvio. Clausule (talk) 12:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ik stel voor het enkele dagen te laten staan tot de mediastorm wat is gaan liggen. Het is immers de enige afbeelding die we van Felice hebben.--Westermarck (talk) 20:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted webrip from www.gva.be with incorrect license, clear copyvio. Multichill (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
This is a logo from an editorial Cameta (talk) 21:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Abigor: In category Copyright violations; not edited for 0 days
=== File:O3ymf8twesjq7r01tji0a418j0vqfpg.jpg ===
Bloody hell? File was uploaded WITH a delete template already on it. Outside project scope. -Nard the Bard 20:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure how that happened. The image on en:wiki was subject of a deletion discussion, but also tagged with Template:Movetocommons as a free image. Since the image's author requested its deletion on en:wiki, there would seem to be no need to keep it here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Multixfer (talk) 21:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not encyclopedic, and author on EN has requested deletion. See w:Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 8#File:O3ymf8twesjq7r01tji0a418j0vqfpg.jpg --Elonka (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Author requested deletion on enwiki, we should honor that request here as well. Killiondude (talk) 05:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't believe it is own work. This user has uploaded nothing but a few copyrighted pictures used to illustrate a company-centred article on the Russian WP (where this one is used as well). This picture is not an original. I'd be convinced if the user could show the original picture either on wiki or on OTRS. Eusebius (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have oroginal of this foto right now, but i can provide it later probably at 13 oct 2009 (9:00 +3GMT msk)--Demrak (talk) 19:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Is it a picture that you have taken yourself, or is it a corporate picture? --Eusebius (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- I shoot it by myself, and i'm edit this photo to publish on website.
- OK let's
Keep and close the file. --Eusebius (talk) 20:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- OK let's
- I shoot it by myself, and i'm edit this photo to publish on website.
Kept. AGF. Eusebius (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Image without description and useless at the state. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment This image is used in some user monobook.css. I don't know if it should be deleted Jalo 19:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Missing description is not a valid reason to delete. Actually used in a Wikimedia project.Trixt (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Own Work. Now there is a better Category:Haddamshausen. --Hydro (Diskussion) 19:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- So just get it speedied as an empty category. No need for discussion here. In general, if a category needs discussion it should go to Commons:Categories for discussion rather than here, anyway. - Jmabel ! talk 05:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fixing speedy deletion --El-Bardo (talk) 08:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Wknight94: (incorrectly named) duplicate of Category:Haddamshausen
Unused, likely copyvio SpaceFlight89 (talk) 04:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete The only things this uploader has ever done are add 3 "versions" of this image. The 1st 2 are nothing to do with the 3rd. I think this user hasn't got a clue and these are as likely to be copyright violations as they are to be anything else. --Simonxag (talk) 10:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Again uploaded but the AU logo is not free according to Commons:Deletion_requests/Logo_of_the_African_Union.svg and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2007-02#Restore_SCO_and_AU_logos_and_flags. The Undeletion request was never closed, therefore a deletion request instead of simply deleting it. The AU logo is creative enough for copyright and protected according to the AU - are there any new arguments? Martin H. (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete The organisation was only founded in 2002. Obvious copyvio. --Simonxag (talk) 11:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
No fair use on Commons. As source, the uploaded stated "Nights of Horror (magazine)", but are these files really in the public domain? This is what the uploader must proof. 132.199.33.92 12:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I hope the uploader feels not to be attacked by me.
- Nobody is claiming fair use, the image was published by "Nights of Horror" in the 1950s, and that publication was not renewed, so copyright has lapsed and it is public domain. Max Rebo Band (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep File is PD. -Nard the Bard 20:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency and this certain image in discussion seems to be one of them. There is no verification that this image falls under a PD-NASA licence. 132.199.211.47 14:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete A Russian rocket is unlikely to have been Photographed by NASA. --Simonxag (talk) 11:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency and this certain image in discussion seems to be one of them. There is no verification that this image falls under a PD-NASA licence. 132.199.211.47 14:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete A Russian rocket is unlikely to have been Photographed by NASA. --Simonxag (talk) 11:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency and this certain image in discussion seems to be one of them. There is no verification that this image falls under a PD-NASA licence. 132.199.211.47 14:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete A Russian rocket is unlikely to have been Photographed by NASA. --Simonxag (talk) 11:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
According to COM:L "from en.wiki" is not considered as a valid source. More source information is necessary. 132.199.211.47 14:20, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Fixed it for you. Next time use tineye, especially for easy to find stuff like NASA drawings. -Nard the Bard 22:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
It was made by the SOHO
- Keep This is just incomprehensible. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
As stated by the Template:PD-USGov-NASA : "All materials created by the SOHO probe are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use.[1]" Is this enough to forbid them or can we upload SOHO images ? --The RedBurn (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- (ec) I am fully aware of the copyright notice on the SOHO website. However, these images and videos come from http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov, where it is simply asked to Please give credit for this item to NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio (example), and their copyright page clearly stipulates: Some SVS images produced in collaboration with other labs have distinct copyrights. For those instances, the copyright notices are noted on the page with the image. I'm pretty sure we can keep these. –Tryphon☂ 20:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- The template also states that "The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency, and other non-American space agencies. These are not necessarily in the public domain.". This note was added by User:Pharos. The RedBurn (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- For those instances, the copyright notices are noted on the page with the image. –Tryphon☂ 21:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This are images based on data gathered by the SOHO satellite. The images were created bu US government employees at the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio. (And it is the images that should be nominated, not the category.) /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. You're misinterpreting the origin of these images, per Peter Kuiper. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This looks like a derivative work of this image at www.manzer.com. The permission parameter of the information templates says "will be provided soon", but it has said that for a long time now. /Ö 21:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Ö 21:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 12:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism, no evidence of usefulness. 99.27.138.106 23:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism, no evidence of usefulness. 99.27.138.106 23:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete blatantly misleading photo edit that effectively has the people pictured holding a banner saying something they did not say. - Jmabel ! talk 05:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --Simonxag (talk) 11:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
We don't need this kind of nonsense at Commons --Multichill (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Might I suggest moving it to user space? 2 users are currently using it. -Nard the Bard 22:12, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, just don't leave a redirect. Multichill (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep If 2 users are using it, then it's useful. --Simonxag (talk) 11:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept, and moved to userspace, since it's used on two userpages. --The Evil IP address (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
According to COM:L "he.wikipedia" is not considered as a valid source. More source information is necessary. 132.199.211.47 14:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Found it in like 1 second with tineye. Fixed it for you. Geez. Keep -Nard the Bard 21:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept, as the information is given now. --The Evil IP address (talk) 10:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
obviously copyvio. appears on the DVD cover of the HHGTTG movie (en:File:Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy.jpg, lower right corner), therefore probably copyrighted by Touchstone Pictures or Buena Vista. -- FordPrefect42 (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- PS: [2] says clearly "©2004 Buena Vista Pictures Distribution" --FordPrefect42 (talk) 15:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
![[2]](http://images.allmoviephoto.com/2005_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy/2005_the_hitchhickers_guide_to_the_galaxy_wallpaper_002.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, sourced to http://yellowicon.com; it cannot be redistributed or sub-licensed and remains the property of Yellowicon.com, according to [3]. –Tryphon☂ 15:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. --The Evil IP address (talk) 10:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Derivative work of presumably copyrighted sculpture Powers (talk) 16:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Covered by FOP COM:FOP#Canada. -Nard the Bard 16:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I withdraw the nomination; you're right of course. I failed to do a sanity check on the location of this image. Powers (talk) 01:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality - I can't make out what's being depicted and so I wouldn't like to say whether it's permanently situated. --Simonxag (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Agree with Simonxag. Little usefulness. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Definately not true: "copyright expired 150 years ago". Copyright violation! 132.199.211.47 14:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Has probably been accidentally overwritten. I deleted the misplaced image versions and restored the original image. NEURO ⇌ 14:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Uploaded in wrong format: resubmitted as svg Gordalmighty (talk) 18:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- No, do the opposite: delete File:NShw_104.svg, which is actually a PNG file (the exact same file as this one), and keep this one. –Tryphon☂ 19:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Per Tryphon. NEURO ⇌ 14:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Low-resolution image without description. At this state, it's useless. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. The resolution of the image is fine. Admittedly JPG is not well-suited for this kind of image, but with a proper description this file is very usable. Since you speak italian couldn't you ask it:Utente:Fabrizio bastianini to add a description? --NEURO ⇌ 13:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Image is labelled in the bottom right corner as created by Theodore Fujita of the University of Chicago. Though NOAA use the image, use does not equal ownership. As detailed at the source: "The information on government servers are in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise" (my emphasis).[4] Consequently, this image does not fall into the same category as the "Courtesy of.." images hosted by the NOAA, whose copyright is released. --DrKiernan (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Appears to have been published before 1978 without a copyright notice... -Nard the Bard 20:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a higher resolution file from a clear Public Domain source...the issue should be solved now. -Runningonbrains (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. DrKiernan (talk) 08:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a higher resolution file from a clear Public Domain source...the issue should be solved now. -Runningonbrains (talk) 04:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn. DrKiernan (talk) 08:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kim Il Sung.jpg: Not covered by the license, documents of State management are PD, not random photographs. Also the image was first published in Japan according to the image description, so it should be under copyright in the country of origin: the country of first publication.
The second license used on en.wikipedia, w:en:Template:CopyrightedFreeUse-DPRK, was deleted from Commons per Commons:Deletion requests/Template:CopyrightedFreeUse-DPRK. Of course the en.wikipedia template was created in good faith, it was created by the user who uploaded this image, but it show some lack of understanding of the policy of all Wikimedia projects. "The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-commercial, non-profit organization, and thus the respective copyrighted work[...]" is not a rational for free content but fair use. Martin H. (talk) 19:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. –Tryphon☂ 19:43, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: This image was first uploaded to EN Wiki under a fair use tag (dual tagged w/ DPRKGov), and was transferred to Commons by another user. This image should not have been transferred to Commons. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs 00:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyright violation, this is a picture from a McLaren Press Release and there is no indication that its copyright status matches the one indicated in the Commons upload. The359 (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio: Copyright violation: http://www.seriouswheels.com/2011/klm/2011-McLaren-MP4-12C-Side-Angle-Field-1280x960.htm Publications and other non-website projects, please contact me. = not free enough
Exact copy of logo used at http://www.imonggo.com/ with copyright asserted. No evidence uploader has the rights or the owner (CEO Victor Javier or otherwise) has released the image. Amorymeltzer (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, per their terms of service, permission is not granted for use. Copyright violation. –blurpeace (talk) 02:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment This was uploaded to be used in the now-deleted Imonggo POS Software article. That deletion (by me) is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 November 13#Imonggo POS Software. If this article is restored or a new one created then it would be possible to use this image as a fair use logo. If the result of the drv is that there is no article for the logo to accompany then obviously any claim of fair use is moot. Thryduulf (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission, no fair use on Commons. –Tryphon☂ 15:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Tightly cropped, low resolution, high quality image - appears to be press photo and no evidence to suggest this was user created --Ytoyoda (talk) 04:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No metadata too. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete pretty sure to have seen this picture on some Italian sports website at time of AC Milan's last Champions League triumph. --Angelo (talk) 11:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Nilfanion (talk) 23:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Is the file is demaged? --Uwe W. (talk) 10:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- The file doesn't show up in Firefox, but it works fine otherwise. A half-sized version of the same file has also been uploaded, and displays properly. I don't think we need to delete this image, we should just link to the smaller version for web use. –Tryphon☂ 20:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've now uploaded it as an OGV video, which is probably better suited for this usage. –Tryphon☂ 20:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
According to COM:L "from en.wiki" is not considered as a valid source. More source information is necessary. 132.199.211.47 14:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Info http://spaceflight1.nasa.gov/gallery/images/exploration/lunarexploration/html/s78_23252.html -- Common Good (talk) 19:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Don't delete it, it's a good picture!
- I've added the above source to the image file. --agr (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
According to COM:L "from en.wiki" is not considered as a valid source. More source information is necessary. 132.199.211.47 14:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Info http://spaceflight1.nasa.gov/gallery/images/exploration/lunarexploration/html/s78_23252.html -- Common Good (talk) 19:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Don't delete it, it's a good picture!
- I've added the above source to the image file. --agr (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment What does the OTRS permission cover? The photo, the subject or both? --Simonxag (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
This picture concerns UPA billboard not building. It is used to show current nationalism in Ukraine. The picture is used in this article.--Paweł5586 (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment In order for this to be kept, permission is needed for this photo and for the billboard which is the subject of the photo. --Simonxag (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
What should I do? The new otrs is needed?--Paweł5586 (talk) 13:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Therefore it was derivative work (of bilboard) and all rights still belonged to the original designer of this bilboard. OTRS permission was covering only the derivative work. Masur (talk) 10:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
google's home page isn't free Hidro (talk) 10:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Google's minimalist home page may in fact be pd-ineligible, but perhaps not. I have no strong opinion on the matter. -Nard the Bard 22:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Google's home page allows screenshots--Computerkid2000 (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC) nope google allows for the web page to be used in screenshots in fact alot of screenshots are like that with the google home page! --Computerkid2000 (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Lol only remove google logo of the picture -.- then its free I think... --Olli (talk) 16:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Agreed, many snapshots of web browsers use the Google home page. This is perfectly fine and I think there is no reason to delete this picture. Cityscape4 (talk)
Most screenshots of webbrowsers use the WIKIPEDIA welcome page. Ols version with the google-logo must be deleted. --High Contrast (talk) 08:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 21:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
According to COM:L "NASA" is not considered as a valid source. More source information is necessary. 132.199.211.47 14:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Based on the uploader's user name this is apparently own work. Tineye can't find a copy of it on the web, which just adds to my conviction this is so. -Nard the Bard 22:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader doesn't explicitly state that this is their own work or that they are this artist. Their username suggests a connection (fandom? friendship?). We need OTRS permission. --Simonxag (talk) 11:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Email from uploader verifying he is the artist forwarded to OTRS. :) -Nard the Bard 17:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Still waiting... -Nard the Bard 22:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Email from uploader verifying he is the artist forwarded to OTRS. :) -Nard the Bard 17:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- I had an OTRS volunteer find the ticket number and I was advised to add the number to the image. I hope it's sufficient and if not I'll try to have them send an email from an "official" address. -Nard the Bard 21:09, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ticket received at Ticket:2009111410019186, further details requested. Stifle (talk) 11:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Kept, OTRS ticket. Kameraad Pjotr 21:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
According to COM:L "English Wikipedia" is not considered as a valid source. More source information is necessary. 132.199.211.47 14:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Updated the source to show it's my "Own Work" Ittiz (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- 'Keep" Uploader says its their own work. --agr (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Permission from "www.7l.nl" is missing 132.199.211.47 14:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS permission should be sent, as the page doesn't say in one word that their images are licensed under the GFDL and Cc-by-sa-3.0. --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Permission from "www.7l.nl" is missing 132.199.211.47 14:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS permission should be sent, as the page doesn't say in one word that their images are licensed under the GFDL and Cc-by-sa-3.0. --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- File:Mut anu.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Anu stravolto.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Anu sorriso.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sado maso.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Pedobear latex furry.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Outside of project scope with no foreseeable educational use. –blurpeace (talk) 01:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete, agree, the latter two are most likely not even self-created. --Martin H. (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete, out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Cigarette boxes with copyrighted logos
[edit]- File:Pall Mall Dutch.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Pall Mall (Poland).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Pall Mall Schachtel.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Pallmall(hun).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fortuna cigarettes (Spain) - front.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro Blend No. 27.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro Reds.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro black menthol japan.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboromenthol.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MarlboroMenthol.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro red soft.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro cigarettes (Spain) - front.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marlboro box x2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
_-_front.jpg){kind=link}
All images have logos/brands which is copyrighted.... -- Meisam (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Info Commons:Help_desk/Archives/2009Apr#Cigarette_brands -- Meisam (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Trademarked or copyrighted? Multichill (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I mean the logos not the names. -- Meisam (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Trademarked or copyrighted? Multichill (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Marlboro has published its logo on its products in the United States since the 1950's without a copyright notice[5]. Also the designs incorporating simple wordmarks and geometry are below the threshold of individuality. -Nard the Bard 19:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep These are cases where the logo is included 'per accident'.--Westermarck (talk) 20:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I believe you are referring to incidental inclusion. I'm not sure that can apply here since the photos are *of* the packaging, not of things including the packaging. However since Marlboro has published billions and billions of copies of these images without a copyright notice before 1978, when U.S. law was changed to no longer require a copyright notice, it should be fine. -Nard the Bard 22:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Nard the Bard seems to be correct. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Low-resolution image without description. At this state, it's useless. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
not in use + Sannita's arguments Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 23:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
copyright violation from http://www.mondodigitale.net/Rivista/07_numero_2/Henin_p._50-57.pdf Skyluke ★ | @it.wk 14:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
copyright violation from http://www.mondodigitale.net/Rivista/07_numero_2/Henin_p._50-57.pdf --Graziap89 (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader's request; he already uploaded a new version. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep just delete the first version. png should be kept instead ot jpg. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Stifle (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
-the image is copyrighted, according to the EU and Estonian copyright laws authors life + 70 years rule applies, and a violation of the Estonian Film Archives terms of service and the price list (A copy of this image is about $US 6.). PS. see also Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Tallinn_-_17_July_1940_-_0-153449.jpg--Termer (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment It does not matter that they charge for the service of making a print - of course they do. A few dollars is just the cost of labor and handling. In my opinion, such orphan images from established archives should be sufficiently free for commons. Like with the Bundesarchiv. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - I do not know how the Estonian Film Archives "terms of service" is relevant here. The archive owns no rights to this image. For what it's worth, I have paid the archive the sum of "about $US 6" for their services in digitizing this image. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment It's pretty much straight forward, because the image is copyrighted, you need to pay for a (digital) copy. And the terms of service are directly related, you want to have a copy from the archive, pay $6. Commons however allows to upload images that are free, copyright expired and in public domain. And in that respect, no archive, even the Bundesarchiv has no control over making any copyrighted images available for free.--Termer (talk) 06:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I have paid the $6 for the digitizing work. This has however nothing to do with copyright issues. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 13:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Question - What did the 1940 Estonian copyright law say about press photographs? I believe it must have been very similar to {{PD-Finland50}}. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- RE: Please see Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Johan_Laidoner1939.jpg that should answer all your questions, especially regarding the former 50 years rule according to the Berne Convention that applied to the images until the EU W:Copyright Duration Directive (93/98/EEC), the 70 years rule was implemented also in Estonia.--Termer (talk) 01:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - This deletion request is clearly a result of the WP:DIGWUREN problem spilling over into Commons. This previous deletion request by the same user is a clear indication that the user wants to create a similar battleground here. For the latest developement in the story, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list. It seems likely that the puppet master will finally be WP:BANned. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Also I have updated the license tag to {{PD-Russia-2008}}. The work was published anonymously in the Soviet Union, including Russia before June 22, 1941. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment even if the image was in the public domain in Russia, which it's not ({{PD-Russia-2008}} only applies to images taken in Russia or in the Soviet Union); the image is still not in the public domain in the EU, USA etc. in countries where the 70 years rule applies, it's that simple -the image is copyrighted: Delete.--Termer (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- FFI please also see similar copyrighted images previously deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Tallinn - 17 July 1940 - 0-153449.jpg, Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Tallinn_-_17_July_1940_-_0-153447.jpg--Termer (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete, since the EU directive W:Copyright Duration Directive (93/98/EEC) applies, see Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Johan_Laidoner1939.jpg. --Martintg (talk) 05:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept, EU-Anonymous. Kameraad Pjotr 19:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Neither {{PD-GE-exempt}} nor {{PD-Russia-2008}} apply to this image. Most likely still under copyright. –Tryphon☂ 19:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nope its actually taken in 1927. Invalid request. Iberieli (talk) 23:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- On en.wp it says 1919, and on the image page both before 1954 and 1949 (presumably a publication date, since the subject died in 1940). So we need better source information, because it's not even clear if Russian or Georgian law applies. Where and when was it first published? Is the author really unknown, or just unknown to the uploader? The source link needs to be more specific too. –Tryphon☂ 07:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, no date of publication/no author. Kameraad Pjotr 19:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Graphic made out of unknown datas. Maybe is an original research. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Looks about right. Unless we have reason to think it is wrong, I would tend to keep. Have you asked the uploader for the basis of the data? As far as I know, Commons has no ban on original research, it's hard to think how a typical photo could be anything but. - Jmabel ! talk 05:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept, seems within project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 19:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Low-resolution image without description. At this state, it's useless. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 23:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The Italian-language description is in the image itself. It says, in effect, simple concave polygon. Together with the title, example rasterization flood fill, that is plenty to create a description. Whether it's useful is another matter, but the lack of a description shouldn't count against an image when a description is easily created. I've certainly worked out the significance of images that were far harder to identify and describe. - Jmabel ! talk 05:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept, out of project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 19:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
This appears to come from the J-Boats web site (http://www.jboats.com/j24/) which asserts, © Copyright 2009, J/Boats, Inc. - All Rights Reserved. -- RoySmith (talk) 10:10 am, Today (UTC−4) RoySmith (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
WRONG- I've already corresponded with Barbetorte and Torelio about this issue. In case you cannot read the King's English. J/Boats is owned by the Johnstone family- that includes Rodney Johnstone, Robert (Bob) Johnstone and is managed by Jeff Johnstone, Alan Johnstone and Stuart Johnstone. The photographers and copyright owners are the persons that are submitting the images- e.g. they ARE the copyright holders. So, "stuj24" (aka Stuart Johnstone) is doing the uploading of the images, creating a basic history on Wikipedia. The WikiMedia Commons is the "suggested" place to place "multimedia", including photos.
If you have ANY further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me (stuj24/ Stuart Johnstone), my father Bob or uncle Rod or even Jeff or Al Johnstone-- e.g. we are the copyright holders and shareholders of the corporation known as "J/Boats Inc" whom you are citing above in your note. I can be contacted at "stuj24@yahoo.com" or "editor@jboats.com" - e.g. the copyright holders has already sent a note to "barbetorte" and other editors at Wikipedia/ Wikimedia to "release" these images "publicly".
Regards, Stuart
- I, user:Barbetorte got a mail from user:Stuj24, that is right. I mailed an answer to him, 11/09/2009, this a copy of my answer:
Mr Johnstone, I am not allowed to give you some authorisation. Please look at this page : [6] and send a mail to Wikimedia Commons as specified in this page. Excuse me for the trouble, but the requests for deletion were made to prevent copies of your site. I am happy to know that your images will be soon on Commons. When it will be confirmed by the board of Wikimedia Commons, I think the 2 images already deleted will come back. If not, please upload them. Best regards, Barbetorte
Stuj24 a écrit : > Hi Barbetorte- > > This is Stuart Johnstone. I am the Chairman of J/Boats, a family business. > > Please reverse/ undo/ undelete the "copyright violation"-- it is our business. I run it. We own the images. > > Thank you, > Stuart >
- I thought that M Johnston would send a standard form mail to Commons, as requested. After that, all images uploaded by user:Stuj24 ( I requested all of them, J/boats shots, some time before, for deletion) have been deleted. I noticed that few days ago Stuj24 has uploaded the same images...Please if somebody can explain to him in a better english than me, what is the right process he should follow to prevent all his images of being soon or later deleted, thank you. Or perhaps put the copy of this mail in commons archives...--Barbetorte (talk) 11:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- PS: Assuming finaly those pictures will be released, Studj24 should not include so many category in his images pages of J/Boats. There is the category:J/Boats yachts which can be detailed with all kinds of J/Boats, and this category is already included in Category:Sailing yachts of the United States. And the two existing subcategories (J/24 and J/80) are already include in Category:Sailing yachts by class. Otherwise it looks like "I want to be seen everywhere" ! --Barbetorte (talk) 12:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 19:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
