Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/11/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Reasons for deletion request -Redbecks (talk) 19:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: deletion request by creator
Commons does not take pictures from Myspace. -Nard the Bard 00:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by MichaelMaggs: Copyright violation: http://www.mpirefilms.com/SAFIYA_SONGHAI/Videos.html
Derivative work. -Nard the Bard 00:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - fair use
http://www.liceoforestalescuadron.cl/ does not give GFDL licenses. -Nard the Bard 00:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Not own work, uploader has uploaded this before, and now he's put it on Flickr. It's still a copyvio. It was attributed before to MYSPACE. -Nard the Bard 02:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
The image is the author's photo, all of the images are under the author's name, Mpirefilms. It is my own work, and Mpirefilms is trademarked under Melissa McClinton, who is the same person the article is about. and the picture is from their personal collection. -Mpirefilms 10:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, in that case {{Copyvio}}
- --D-Kuru (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: all rights reserved from flickr
Originally liscensed on Panoramio as Non-Derivatives, which is not allowed on Commons. Soxred93 (talk) 04:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Soxred93, ab jetzt ist die Lizenz von R.Möhler auf "Attribution Share Alike" zurückgesetzt, so dass Most Curious dieses Foto nun auch in Commons verwenden darf. Bitte dieses Foto nicht löschen. Mit der Lizenz ist alles geregelt. Vielen Dank. Most Curious
- Confirmed ("Attribution Share Alike")[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 16:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Kept licence changed, now cc-by-sa --D-Kuru (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Originally liscensed on Panoramio as Non-Derivatives, which is not allowed on Commons. Soxred93 (talk) 04:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Soxred93, ab jetzt ist die Lizenz von R.Möhler auf "Attribution Share Alike" zurückgesetzt, so dass Most Curious dieses Foto nun auch in Commons verwenden darf. Bitte dieses Foto nicht löschen. Mit der Lizenz ist alles geregelt. Vielen Dank. Most Curious
- Confirmed ("Attribution Share Alike")[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Kept licence changed, now cc-by-sa --D-Kuru (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted software Soxred93 (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Mike.lifeguard: : Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Originally liscensed on Panoramio as Non-Derivatives, which is not allowed on Commons. Soxred93 (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Soxred93, ab jetzt ist die Lizenz von R.Möhler auf "Attribution Share Alike" zurückgesetzt, so dass Most Curious dieses Foto nun auch in Commons verwenden darf. Bitte dieses Foto nicht löschen. Mit der Lizenz ist alles geregelt. Vielen Dank. Most Curious
- Confirmed ("Attribution Share Alike")[3]. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Kept licence cahnged; now cc-by-sa --D-Kuru (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
the description has a joke claiming "robbie" is the greatest man alive. some kid joking perhaps. the photo is fine. 133.32.203.119 08:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- An ip had added some clear vandalism, including writing 'hilary clinton' and 'barak obama' backwards as the names of apparent priests of the church. I've cleared this out, the image should be kept. Benea (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy kept; no problem other than vandalism to description text which has since been reverted. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
COM:DW, w:en:Sonic the Hedgehog (character) is protected by copyright. sугсго 09:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - fair use
COM:DW, w:en:Sonic the Hedgehog (character) is protected by copyright. sугсго 09:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - derivative work
Uploaded for and only used in a speedily deleted article en:Shenaniguns (non-notable company). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
personal image, out of COM:SCOPE and eventually an attack image (regarding the original description) Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- due to edit conflict, has already been deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Eliot Hodgkin died in 1987. So far as I can see, this work is still protected by copyright in the UK. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Please delete asap. My mistake. Thanks Angus. Poltair (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy deleted for copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Company logo, most likely not self-made. Soxred93 (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - logo
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
not public domain --Simeon87 (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - screenshot of "World in Conflict"
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
not public domain --Simeon87 (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - screenshot of "World in Conflict"
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
not public domain --Simeon87 (talk) 18:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - screenshot of "World in Conflict"
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
image is edited in a offensive way 195.174.68.8 20:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- More importantly, it's a falsification of a document[4], pretending to be original. --Túrelio (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Vandalism - no educational use. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Copyrighted figure 83.85.95.146 21:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - derivative work
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Copyrighted figure 83.85.95.146 21:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - derivative work
as of COM:SCOPE; personal image without any real use Túrelio (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
Outside scope. -Nard the Bard 22:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Duplicate of Image:Zahi Hawass.jpg with "fuck" edited into background. Offensive and an alternative uncorrupted version exists QuiteUnusual (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. offensive, out of scope, not used Herr Kriss (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
as of COM:SCOPE. Image declared as user image, but not used on any page. Túrelio (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
as of COM:SCOPE. Image with filename ME.jpg and description "Colton Scott", but nowhere in use. Túrelio (talk) 23:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
Copyright violations, as the photo was originally taken from this site. The uploader claimed that it was his own work, as well as being a cousin of Angel Locsin. However, the statement written on this page appears as if the photo was taken by a fan who visited Locsin on location and not by a cousin as claimed by the uploader. The uploader is also a sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez a suspected sockpuppet who is prone to uploading copyvio images on Commons and claim it as his own work. -- 114.198.145.132 13:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio by a Gerald Gonzalez sockpuppet. Kanonkas(talk) 00:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
COM:DW, Secret Maryo is a cw of w:en:Mario. Mario is protected by copyright. sугсго 10:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- delete as dw or Commons:Fan art; in the game en:Secret Maryo Chronicles they now use another character as protagonist (think why). --Isderion (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment The game is licenced under GPL. It's in use on de:Benutzer:Euphoriceyes/Secret Maryo Chronicles. The image description text says "Frühere Version mit Super Mario" which is Early version with super Mario in english. It's very near to dw, but I'm not usre if you really can call it a dw. --D-Kuru (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is not a work of fan art of super mario, they just copied the SNES Super Mario World Super Mario sprite. sугсго 09:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 20:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Photo published in France less than 70 years ago. Author unknown. Teofilo (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 20:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Work created in a EU country less than 70 years ago. See also en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Mitchell (production manager) Teofilo (talk) 14:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 20:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Not photographed by Luke Ford, but by Jay Cummings (see http://www.lukeisback.com/images/photos/010110.htm, top); therefore OTRS permission does not apply. Rosenzweig δ 15:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep Luke Ford's permission is for anything on his website. -Nard the Bard 21:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
,_dessin_par_Lismonde,_1943.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
- It is not. If you read it, you can see that a) it is only for images and b) it is only for the photos HE has taken. If it were otherwise, the separate permission for photos from Mike South that were posted there would not be necessary. --Rosenzweig δ 00:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete I know exactly what permissions we do and do not have since I was the one who arranged to get them, and Rosenzweig is dead on. We have permission for the photos Luke's taken, and we have permission for the few photos taken by Mike South that are on Luke's site as well. We do not have anything for Jay Cummings. Tabercil (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 20:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
May also should get deleted:
I don't think that it's the uploaders own work.
D-Kuru (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 20:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
,_dessin_par_Lismonde,_1943.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_dessin_par_Lismonde,_1943.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artist fr:Lismonde died in 2001 Teofilo (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
,_dessin_par_Lismonde,_1943.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Copyvio. Pruneautalk 15:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 21:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
,_dessin_par_Lismonde,_1943.jpg){kind=link}
Artist fr:Carlo Lambert died in 1940 (undelete in January 2011) Teofilo (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio. Pruneautalk 15:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 21:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Work made in a EU country less than 70 years ago. This is neither a a statute, ordinance, official decree nor a judgment Teofilo (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Still it's made by a government institut (armed forces) and therefor the template fits. No reason for deletation. --Memnon335bc (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I will ask for other people's opinions on Commons:Forum. Teofilo (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- delete, not everything published by a government institution is a w:de:amtliches Werk. Only in very specific cases § 5 can be applied. Read the Begründung zur ersten Fassung des UrhG (explanatory memorandum to the German copyright law) to understand that only a narrow interpreation is valid. --Isderion (talk) 14:37, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- comment. Not possible to close your eyes just a few months ? Ceedjee (talk) 21:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- In a few months 70 years will be over, but if there is a copyright on this, you have to wait until 70 years after the death of the author.
- The UrhG is a 1965 law. In 1939 the LUG was relevant. The equivalent of § 5 UrhG seems to be § 16 LUG. That paragraph doesn't cover the image we are talking about. I haven't read all paragraphs in that law, perhaps there are additional regulations in other paragraphs. I doubt it, but if you want to try, you now know the place to search.
- delete. --Slomox (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- When did the author die ? In fact, I checked. He died 2 years before the publication. Kind Regards. Ceedjee (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please add his name and the date of death to the image description page. --Slomox (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- If the author died 2 years ago the publication - ok. But what is the name of him? --Marcela (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- I will add the name asap. But I am 100% sure. Ceedjee (talk) 09:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- If the author died 2 years ago the publication - ok. But what is the name of him? --Marcela (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please add his name and the date of death to the image description page. --Slomox (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
See also at Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Zeitschrift-Wehrmacht.jpg --Mrilabs (talk) 09:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ChristianBier (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
May also should get deleted:
Out of scope; unused D-Kuru (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not used, article on en.wiki deleted. Herr Kriss (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Scope, licensing etc etc. --Herby talk thyme 13:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Maxim: Missing essential information: license/permission/source
The copyright term in Mexico is 100 years after the photographer's death. See COM:L#Mexico Teofilo (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Surely not PD-self as claimed. Pruneautalk 15:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 15:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
as of COM:SCOPE. Unused image of unknown content without any description, by one-time uploader who has not been active since. Túrelio (talk) 22:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 00:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted unused image that is clearly out of our scope abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 15:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
1939 Austrian pictures
[edit]
Work created in a EU country less than 70 years ago. See also en:Directive harmonizing the term_of copyright protection#Copyright restoration Teofilo (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 20:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
anonymous French pictures from 1939/1940
[edit]
Photograph made in France less than 70 years ago Teofilo (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ~/w /Talk 21:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Images by User:Ythetaz
[edit]File:Col saint bernard.jpg ()
File:Bernard.jpg ()
File:NorbertBrunner.jpg ()
File:Schwery.jpg ()
File:MauriceTornay.jpg ()
File:MgrAdam.jpg ()
This user has uploaded many copyvios, see talk page of the user. I have deleted the main part of his uploads now (as requested by actual copyright holder via OTRS) and these are the remaining ones. They are all tagged own work, as were the ones I deleted. I think most of them are not his own work, if not all of them. As long as we don't get a clear statement who created these images, I think they have to go. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 18:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted all, per nomination. File:Bernard.jpg might maybe be PD-art, but I was unable to find anything about that. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 15:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Commons isn't photo album and we don't need it. OsamaK 09:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete: outside project scope. WjBscribe 18:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
as of COM:SCOPE. Declared as user image, but not used on any page as of today. Túrelio (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
The image on the source page is tagged as © Ken Marschall all rights reserved. No evidence this is either a work of a Brazillian news agency or the US government Benea (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --84.167.78.164 09:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Dont delete it. I have seen it in more than 3 books and they were all illustrated by Ken Marshall. Zeno Panthakree (talk) 03:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it's his work and is copyrighted to that artist. Therefore its use here without permission is a copyright violation. Benea (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No permission from copyright holder.
Invalid reasons given for PD 83.85.95.146 19:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
commercial image of company, not for public use 84.155.214.122 23:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no public, no author, origin is fanuc corp., USA 84.155.214.122 23:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, company picture of Fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, copyright from fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, copyright is fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, copyright is fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, copyright is fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, copyright is fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 05:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
no PD, no author, copyright is fanuc ltd, usa 84.155.214.122 23:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by MBisanz: Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:R-2000iA.jpg
May also should get deleted:
I don't think that games in 1911 looked like this.
D-Kuru (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep the 1911 version, Delete the 1936 version. I don't see a problem with the 1911 version. However, the 1936 version is a photograph of a drawing published after 1923 in the US, so it isn't free. Pruneautalk 15:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a flimsy rationalization. While I have no specific knowledge of this game, certainly the printing technology of the time was capable of something like this. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Note that it says Russian Empire and that there appear to be no travel sections by air. I believe this game is from 1911, at least I see no reason to doubt it. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- On the other hand, a game about pirates maybe won't use airplanes anyway.. I noted the same picture with the exact same resolution an be found on http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/5910?size=medium, as well as other sizes. This confirms the age, but raises doubts about the origin. Of course it's possible the user is the same person who uploaded it there, but it feels unlikely. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, its nothing but a map!! And maps don t have any threshold of originality. --Peng (talk) 10:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted 1936, Kept 1911. MBisanz talk 05:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Work created in a EU country less than 70 years ago Teofilo (talk) 15:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Present situation
[edit]
- This work was taken from Wikikids <http://kennisnet.wikia.com/wikikids>.
- A link on the page <http://kennisnet.wikia.com/wikikids/wiki/Wikikids:Handleiding-wikivolw/Auteursrecht> was providing a valid license.
- Since then, the website has changed its main address.
- The new website is to be found at <http://wikikids.wiki.kennisnet.nl>
- The page providing informations on license is <http://wikikids.wiki.kennisnet.nl/Auteursrecht>
- But the image seems to have disapeared in the process. I try to find more about it.
MHM-com (talk) 17:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
An email requesting more information and - if possible - a declaration of consent, has been sent to the person who uploaded the image on Wikikids. -- MHM-com (talk) 14:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- What we need is a permission from the photographer. If that person is not the photographer, it will be very difficult to keep it. Teofilo (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, I know the procedure. I just received the link to the website where the picture has been taken from (De Weerkplaats). I will ask them about the photographer or rights owner. -- MHM-com (talk) 07:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Permission via OTRS is needed.--Trixt (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Derivative work. Because there is {{Ja}} used in the description I think it's taken in Japan. There is no FOP in Japan (see COM:FOP#Japan)
D-Kuru (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's called "The Myth of Tomorrow" and it is currently located in Japan[5] but it was painted in Mexico. I doubt, however, the photograph is from Mexico.
Neutral -Nard the Bard 13:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC) - Myself photographed it in Japan (Shibuya Station). I edited two pieces of photographs with "Photoshop". (Image:Asunosinwa3.JPG,Image:Asunosinwa4.JPG) Lemon-s (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It doesn't matter where the painting is located, since freedom of panorama only applies to 3D works. This is a photo of a copyrighted painting and is therefore not free. Pruneautalk 08:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted per Pruneau. No 2D FOP in Japan. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
We're gonna need proof this is "own work". -Nard the Bard 21:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Joe Locke Force of Four albumcover.jpg got undeleted by ChrisiPK, because Natz claimed that it's his own work. Right now there is no clear proof that he is nor that he isn't the author. An OTRS ticket would be the best, but who should send this ticket?
- --D-Kuru (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Um, the uploader? -Nard the Bard 12:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- The rights owner has to send it. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Um, the uploader? -Nard the Bard 12:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No OTRS permission received, so far as I can see, even after five months. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
derivative work - book is likely to be copyrighted --Jaro.p (talk) 11:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- If so, delete. --Tavrian (talk) 22:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- That's not the point. The book author has no copyright over images which are already in the public domain. A four-square arrangement is probably too obvious to be an artistic work just by arrangement alone. --Sumple (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- I say keep because the four images are what is important; the text in the middle does not matter. In addition, the four images are in the public domain in Russia. --Įиʛ§øç βїʛβяøтњєя Rant | Contributions 07:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- keep book author has no copyright over images which are already in the public domain. -- Esemono (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- the image botton right is a painting. Painting is not PD --Jaro.p (talk) 12:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Derivative works cannot claim copyright over the original PD work. -- King of Hearts (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep as per the reasons stated above regarding PD works.
Kept: per explanations Belgrano (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
fr:Pierre Reverdy died less than 70 years ago Teofilo (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment I don't think it's the same Pierre Reverdy as the one in the fr.wp article. In the description, Reverdy is credited as the voice in the music file, but it is clear that this was recorded long after 1960, when fr:Pierre Reverdy died. Pruneautalk 15:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think that "voice" means "text" in the uploader's mind (but I might be wrong). Teofilo (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- The uploader wrote "Voix : Pierre Reverdy, Encore l'amour, 1939". If everything was made after 1960, why did he write 1939 ? Teofilo (talk) 11:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- OK, after listening more carefully to the entire file, I think I understand what was meant: the song itself is clearly pretty recent (the band Molypop was founded in 2006), but around the 2'30" mark, there is about a sentence spoken by someone else; it sounds like an old recording. Presumably, that is the part which is Pierre Reverdy's voice and dates back to 1939. I don't know enough about audio files to decide whether this is an unacceptable derivative work. Could some sort of de minimis possibly apply? Pruneautalk 09:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- The uploader wrote "Voix : Pierre Reverdy, Encore l'amour, 1939". If everything was made after 1960, why did he write 1939 ? Teofilo (talk) 11:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think that "voice" means "text" in the uploader's mind (but I might be wrong). Teofilo (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Kept per Pruneau as this should be treated as a case of de minimis. I located the voice of Pierre Reverdy in the time interval between 2:27 and 2:36, i.e. the voice in the background is to be heard for 9 seconds only. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)