User talk:Esemono
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 14:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Soviet censorship with Stalin.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Soviet censorship with Stalin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bogdan K 05:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Wrong information in the map
[edit]The image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Balkans_Animation_1800-2006.gif ist wrong. The principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia did always exist, though they were not independent, but vassal (like Montenegro). Both states have never been an ottoman villayet. --Olahus 17:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) The image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Balkans_Animation_1800-2006.gif is wrong. Part of Iran between 1700 to 1900.
Your continental animations
[edit]Well done, well done. I had tried to do North America, but I think my error was trying to go too far back; clearly, yeah, sticking to "non-native control" was key. I'm not sure if I agree with including the states, provinces, etc., but on the whole you did a great job. :) Nice job on South America too, I also tried that and ran into trouble of figuring out where the borders were in the middle of the continent. --Golbez 20:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
The most wonderful thing I have seen in Wikipedia
[edit]Your maps are the most wonderful thing I have seen in Wikipedia. But I believe there is a small error in the Brasilian southern border. Indeed the Missiones Orientales were far south. I will find some maps to discuss with you. Another suggestion: the southern border of Argentina and Chile was indian territory in the 19th century. There was no clear definition of where started the indian territories and where finished Argentina. Why not to blurr the line to give the ideia that a defined border did not exist? Thanks for your great work.
Quissamã--Quissamã (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Soviet censorship with Stalin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 12:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Please don't forget to categorize your images. I am now categorizing your Poland-related maps, please ensure that all of your other images are properly categorized. Uncategorized images (maps in particular) lose much of their usefulness, as they are much more difficult to find by interested editors and users. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1993.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1938.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1991.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1653.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1804.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1701.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1713.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1721.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1933.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1792.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1938b.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1939.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1645.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:Territorial changes of Poland 1920b.jpg is uncategorized since 2 April 2009.
- Image:USIASeal.jpeg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Sktf.svg was uncategorized on 16 October 2009.
- Image:1967 in text.svg was uncategorized on 4 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:1968 in text.svg was uncategorized on 4 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:1969 om text.svg was uncategorized on 4 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Your territorial changes of Poland maps ...
[edit]...contain a significant error. Silesia was part of Prussia since 1742, yet all your maps prior to 1919 include Silesia in the Habsburg empire instead. 62.134.88.17 08:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 0cb784ac58515c923894f8aed037faab
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File tagging File:David_McMillan_1999_Athens_square.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:David_McMillan_1999_Athens_square.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:David_McMillan_1999_Athens_square.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yann (talk) 22:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello , I've been checking your image since time ago, but I didn't notice that you forgot three things I know;
- 1823-1825: United Provinces of Central America (No colonies)
- 1825-1839: Federal Republic of Central America
- 1825 - British Honduras (U.K)
- 1825 - the line marked on the border of Nicaragua as part of U.K, it's wrong, it was part of the great Colombia not U.K
Thanks. --TownDown How's it going? 22:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Report a problem
[edit]Hello. Your timeline map of ottomon empire has a big problem. Between 1683 and 1829, casacus regions are shown as part of ottomon empire, while in reality it was part of Persian empire that later due to Treaty of Gulistan and Treaty of Turkmencha were submitted to Russian empire. I'll be appreciably grateful if you correct it. Aliwiki (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Swedish Pomerania missing
[edit]You did a great job with your maps. However, they display Swedish Pomerania as part of Brandenburg-Prussia. The problem occurs in the maps covering the mid- and late 1600s and the early 1700s, until 1721.
The border between Swedish Pomerania and Brandenburg ran some kilometers east of the Oder until 1679, from a point east of Cammin/Kammin/Kamien to a point south of Greifenhagen/Gryfino (?), with the latter being on the Swedish side and Stargard on the Brandenburgian side, from there it turned west. See en:Treaty of Stettin (1653).
From 1679 to 1720, the border was determined by the Oder and Dievenow/Dzwina (?), with Wollin/Wolin remaining with Sweden. See en:Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye (1679).
Since 1720, the border was determined by the Peene and Peenestrom rivers, so the part remaining with Sweden until 1815 is not depicted on your maps anymore. See en:Treaty of Stockholm (Great Northern War).
I guess you have some sort of a "master map" and would be grateful if you correct the erroneous maps. I tried for 1660. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 12:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Problem in gif image
[edit]Hello. Could you review File:Non-Native_American_Nations_Control_over_South_America_1700_and_on.gif, please? It's seems that the gif image is not working anymore. Thanks. Giro720 (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Borders of Poland and Belarus before August 1945.png
[edit]Dude you forgot a small segment on the San river in the south-west of Poland, city of Peremyshl etc. Add Ukraine to the map as well. Regards
Could you please provide the regular Flickr-URL for this image, not the useless static-URL. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the URL is still without use as it has no information at all about the image (author, rights, et.c) --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Subpectoral breast implants.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Subpectoral breast implants.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--SpinningSpark 09:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Mistake on Ottoman Empire Map year 1923
[edit]Very nice maps... but as in the title mentioned there is a mistake on the last Image/gif of Ottoman Empire (1923).
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Territorial_changes_of_the_Ottoman_Empire_1923.jpg
Because here the province " Hatay " wasn't a part of Turkey in 1923. Hatay has been included to Turkey since 1938 but not before. It was something like a gouverment of France but due to an aggreement between Turkey and France it became again a turkish province.
So here is a link which shows where the province Hatay is and the text as a prove for it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatay_Province
Pls correct this. It has not to be counted as a turkish province in 1923 but the map can be extended further to 1938 where Hatay is and has to be counted as a province of Turkey. Thanks
files
[edit]Not good images: File:Territorial changes of Poland 1940.jpg, File:Territorial changes of Poland 1942.jpg Szajci pošta 11:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Ottoman Empire map 1739 - 1817
[edit]Your map shows w:Vojvodina (the northern part of modern-day Serbia, bordering modern-day Hungary) being part of the Ottoman Empire from 1739 (w:Treaty of Belgrade) until 1817, while it continued to be under Habsburg rule. Instead, a part of northern Bosnia and a part of Serbia south of Belgrade wasn't part of the Ottoman Empire 1718-1739 (see File:Passarowitz_1718.JPG). Icek (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Mai Lai
[edit]I just happened to see this Commons:Deletion requests/File:My Lai massacre.jpg -- I agree with you 100%, your totally correct. I don't understand the Keep's in that thread, they seemed to be engaged in wishful thinking and ignoring the evidence. Green Cardamom (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
[edit]Today I found your animation on North-American territorial changes. Totally cool! I replayed it several times. A big thanks, and some virtual stroopwafels. If you send me your postal address, I will follow up with the real thing. Erik Zachte (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2012 (UTC) |
Copyright status: File:Ronald Allen Smith Mug Shot.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Ronald Allen Smith Mug Shot.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 16:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]A page has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:HMS Bayano with dazzle camouflage c1914-15.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:HMS Bayano with dazzle camouflage c1914-15.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Looking up at the Tokyo Tower 2016.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Looking up at the Tokyo Tower 2016.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
South America map: Chiloé
[edit]Hi Esemono,
great work, really! I found just one thing missing, this is the island of Chiloé. This island had been under spanish rule since the conquest of 1567 and stayed spanish after 1598. During 17th and 18th century it was a very important Spanish exclave deep in South - and was spanish even in the first few years after chilean independence. Only in 1826 it came under chilean rule. I understand that your map cannot depict each and every small territory's change; but Chiloé seems to me very important as worth to be shown.
Another outpost was the enclave of Valdivia; however it's territory is probably too small for being shown in this map. Regards Wassermaus (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Soviet leaders Red Square Moscow 1919.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Statue of Giraffe near Tokyo Station - 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
G I Chandor (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
land area of the US and New Spain / Mexico since ~1760
[edit]Hello:
Do you have data on land area of New Spain / Mexico since ~1760?
www.u-s-history.com/pages/h986.html provides numbers for the US population and land area for each decennial census 1790-2000.
I'm working developing an essay on Wikiversity on v:Nuclear weapons and effective defense, and I'd like to include a plot showing how the US has grown while Mexico has shrunk. The data above gives me something to plot for the US, but I could use numbers for Mexico.
If you do not have such a table handy, can you give me shapefiles used to create the maps? I'm relatively facile with R (programming language), and can probably compute it if I have the shapefiles used to create your marvelous series of plots.
Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 00:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Animated gif South-America don´t work
[edit]Hello Esemono, i´ve insert your great map on de.Wikipedia, but the Animation don´t work (Mac Safari, Firefox and Chromebook). What´s the matter? Can you fix? Greetings from germany --Fährtenleser (talk) 07:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Category:Scranton_Slides has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
You should fix a map
[edit]Hi, this map is wrong. Hatay annexed by Turkey in 1939. By the way you need a map from 1923, because this map shows present-day borders. - Felecita (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1699.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1718.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1739.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:07, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1774.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1783.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1792.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1798.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1801.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1817.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 06:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Question on "Territorial evolution of North America since 1763"
[edit]I absolutely love your map that you've created for the territorial evolution of North America. It fits perfectly in my teaching curriculum, and it will be a great visual for my students. However, it goes too fast to study the maps that I want to analyze with my students. I was wondering if there is any way to allow the user to decide when to transition to the next map. I'm not sure how you created this map, but it would be great if I could study specific years and do a comparison. It would be great to allow the user to move forward and backwards. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.44.224.249 (talk) 16:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Yakov Fedotovich Pavlov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:29, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Territorial changes of Poland 1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Каракорум (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Excellent Balkanization map!
[edit]I just stumbled upon your map illustrating the changing political geography in SE Europe. It rocks! Well done! Especially the work put into the description. The timeline is fantastic and wonderfully succinct. Good show!Gamle Kvitrafn (talk) 20:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Camilla Hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Kaba class Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer Katsura helping allies in the Adriatic, Jul 4 1917.jpg
[edit]File:Kaba class Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer Katsura helping allies in the Adriatic, Jul 4 1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thats Just Great (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I think you mislabeled Saint Martin as part of the UK on your Caribbean maps
[edit]Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Ottoman Empire 1912 map is partially historical inaccurate.Territorial changes of the Ottoman Empire 1912.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Territorial_changes_of_the_Ottoman_Empire_1912.jpg
[edit]Batum, Kars, Ardahan, Artvin were occupied by Russians in 1878 after Berlin Agreement and they were a part of Russian Empire until 1918 ; There was a temporary Ottoman Occupation in some Iran regions between 1906-1918; there were some autonomous but Ottoman vassal Arap tribes and Principalities (Iraq and Northern arabia -El Jeyf Confederation; Jabal al Shammar and some Iraq tribes); Crete,Kuwait became autonomuous before 1912, also Cyprus was rented by Britain Empire in 1878. I want an upload permission or I will send you a map that I modified, to your mail address so that you will use my map if you wish. Here is my Ottoman Empire 1909 map before Ottomans losing Trablusgarp (Libya) and some eastern Arabic Territorries. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/II._Abd%C3%BClhamid_d%C3%B6neminde_toprak_kay%C4%B1plar%C4%B1#/media/Dosya:2.Abdulhamid'in_%C3%B6l%C3%BCm%C3%BCnde_Osmanl%C4%B1_%C4%B0maparatorlu%C4%9Fu_(1909).jpg Yours sincerly.(Gerçekler (talk) 03:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC))