Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/08/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 4th, 2008
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Publication may be restricted.", per LOC image page 76.175.162.28 03:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by uploader. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Publication may be restricted. " per LOC image page 76.175.162.28 03:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by uploader. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Publication may be restricted." per LOC image page Mangostar (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by uploader. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Publication may be restricted." per LOC image page Mangostar (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by uploader. Nishkid64 (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publication may be restricted. per LOC image page Mangostar (talk) 03:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 03:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was a work for Wikigraphists of the French Graphics Lab. it was my proposition, but not the chosen one. there are other versions of this picture on commons. I found later that the uploader of the original picture was a well known copyvio maker, socks puppet master, banned from WP:fr, Wikinews, commons etc. I request it to be deleted cause i would like to avoid unexcessary risk, as this picture is said to be uploaded by me, and that it s not used. thx Lilyu (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Lilyu (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. If the uploader themselves is concerned ... I think that is enough. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 04:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misspelled the title of the picture, uploaded correct version, this one can be deleted Dedden (talk) 06:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


deleted,

best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hidden sexism UNiesert (talk) 08:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt posed for voyeuristic interest (hardly seems "hidden"). That alone is not reason for deletion. Unless there is some indication of problem with licensing or permission,  Keep -- Infrogmation (talk) 11:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, for now, with no prejudice to a later re-opening over COM:PEOPLE issues. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

hidden sexism UNiesert (talk) 09:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sexism, racism and so on are not a valid reasons for deletion. Is the image usefull? // Liftarn (talk) 09:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt either the photographer or the intended audience is a fan of Japanese school girl uniforms. Whatever. No valid deletion reason offered.  Keep. -- Infrogmation (talk) 11:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, for now, with no prejudice to a future nomination over COM:PEOPLE issues. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

hidden sexism UNiesert (talk) 09:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sexism, racism and so on is not a valid reason for deletion. Is the image usefull? // Liftarn (talk) 09:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, but with no prejudice to a future re-opening due to COM:PEOPLE issues. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate Jvmonjo (talk) 11:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentI have tagged it as duplicate --Mardetanha talk 16:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

18:12, August 6, 2008 Cecil (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Escut de Masalfasar2.svg" ‎ (Dupe of Image:Escut de Masalfasar.svg) (restore)

 — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious about being "own work"... Megapixie (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a low quality version with changed metadata of http://veling-aviation.com/press-release.html (Article: Second ATR72-500 aircraft for Veling, 19 April 2007). sounds a bit strange, but it looks like it is photographed from the monitor with a low quality camera. Other images of this user are looking very similar (like Image:GolfA (3).jpg). Martin H. (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted. Photo of a photo, uploader is not copyright holder. I suggest all uploads by Fatooosh (talk · contribs) be examined, they may all be similar problems. -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrught violation, the source page itself says it's copyrighted at the bottom. I believe the non-free version I uploaded at en.wikipedia w:Image:Coat of arms of South Africa.svg is the correct license. The claim he makes that "This image is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship." is incorrect. Jackaranga (talk) 12:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. This is vectorised from a vector-images.com image, and we decided long ago that images from this site were non-free (largely because they forbade making vector versions of them). Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category moved (copied) to category:Astrochelys_radiata. There is no use for category:Geochelone radiata, anymore AxelStrauss (talk) 12:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC) --AxelStrauss (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Create a redirect if you want. Rocket000(talk) 02:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio - flickrstream is a bunch of random low-resolution pictures of completely different subjects 76.175.162.28 13:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. I don't believe that Flickr user "Indio" owns the copyright to "Melrose Place" and "Back to the Future". Thuresson (talk) 22:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And closed! Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France. dave pape (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i did not mean to upload it Youngpadawan12345 (talk) 15:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has resided for > 1 month in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams without objection; more see below. Leyo 17:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been replaced by Image:Piperonal structure.png and Image:Piperonal.svg. --Leyo 17:21, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Edgar181 (talk) 20:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tamaño inadecuado Cgroman (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Deleted, copyright violation! --Dschwen (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: blury children art Jarekt (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is in use -> within scope. // Liftarn (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is used on a user page, discussion page, and as an example of bad images hosted on Wiki. --Jarekt (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Kimse (talk) 07:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The primary subject of the photo is a copyrighted billboard, and would be a fair use photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo may be CC-licensed, but what about the original crossword? Rat at WikiFur (talk) 23:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as clear copyright violation. On top of that, it looks very suspicious, as the letters are already filled in and done so obviously with a computer and not a pencil. An answer grid doesn't look like that. 76.114.86.121 23:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair point, feel free to delete it (or am I the only person who can do this?). New to WikiCommons. Thank you.


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely that a company would freely license their logo Rat at WikiFur (talk) 23:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong identification, unused, will upload again. adamantios (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Rlevse: Dupe of Image:Aegypius-monachus-eurasian-black-vulture-0a.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have no idea, whether the description is correct, but when it would by true, it would be a work by Leni Riefenstahl, died in 2003 --Mutter Erde (talk) 09:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: blury watermarked children art Jarekt (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: blury watermarked children art Jarekt (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is either a poster or a magazine cover from 1939. For reasons unknown it is tagged as "public domain". It has been tagged as "no source" three times before and it does not have a sensible source. The uploader has left the project but has a long history of deleted contributions. Thuresson (talk) 22:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

no sources for various images 206.170.102.210 22:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. No basis for licence has been given MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use planned, minor quality. completed only deletion request --Svens Welt (talk) 08:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As author of the aformentioned image I do absolutely agree with Svens Welt. Therefore, delete. Christaras A (talk) 11:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Cecil (talk) 12:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Japan films published after 1953 are copyrighted until 70 years later from its publication. 1955+70=2025 This film "Gero no Kubi" published in 1955 is copyrighted until 2025. --miya (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, but the reason given by Miya-san is not appropriate. According to common belief of the Japanese Copyright Law, one cut of film is not treated as cinematographic work but as photographic work. Copyright protection for the photographic work published in 1955 is expired (see Template:PD-Japan-oldphoto). However, this image seems to be captured from TV program. Unauthorized reproduction of received TV program image infringes the neighboring rights of the broadcasting organization (Article 98). This problem is independent of its copyright status.--ZCU (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Cecil (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed photo, no category, no English translation FxJ 14:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Out of project scope would be a deletion reason, the rest is not a valid reason. But this image was taken from the artists page without permission so it has to be deleted. Cecil (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real source; seems to be a scan (border); so copyright is questionable Avron (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Is not a scan. I have transferred this image from english wikipedia, from this page. The deletion is not correct.--Goldorak (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was uploaded to en: by Kos93 who seem to have a problem of understanding copyright. Thuresson (talk) 22:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, the original image was uploaded 12 September 2007, and I transferred this 5 may 2008. See the date. --Goldorak (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what? You are not the author, you just transfered in from en-wiki. But where is the "original" image from? --Avron (talk) 06:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


taken from http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2247/t55a1511sd.jpg appears in thread dateing from 2005 http://www.mycity-military.com/Kopnena-vojska/Oklopne-jedinice-bivsih-YU-republika.html
18:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. Copyvio. Cecil (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No justification for the PD-self license provided. The uploader name is not the same as the author. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. No permission. Cecil (talk) 12:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, one of the photos of this collage was CC-BY-NC (Image:Woman at market in Bangalore.jpg -- it had been tagged by FlickrreviewR back in December 2006 and I just deleted it today), and thus this image is in violation of the license. Also, one of its member images is CC-BY-SA so this can't be GFDL, but that's a tangential point. howcheng {chat} 21:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Collage contains unfree material. Cecil (talk) 12:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission given, DÜP will care about it on de.wikipedia (asking the author) Forrester [[ hate+love letters ]] 14:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. ChristianBier (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence at source website of GFDL license 206.170.102.210 14:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My impression is that every photo on the website is used without permission. No information about sources or credit to the photographer. Thuresson (talk) 22:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. No original source or evidence that site has rights to license the image. dave pape (talk) 16:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, no possible encyclopaedic use Matthiasb (talk) 22:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. No proper licence stated MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed photo, no category, no English translation FxJ 14:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Kept.A decent photo. Please add a category. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong identification, unused, will upload again. adamantios (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong identification, unused, will upload again. adamantios (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by the South African government Jackaranga (talk) 12:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that's copyrighted ? -- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 14:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As-tu des preuves tangibles que ces armes soient soumises aux droits d'auteur. Je suis résolument opposé à cette suppression tant que la preuve n'en sera pas apportée. Cela commence à bien faire que de saboter les autres projets Wikimédia.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 22:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
C'est à celui qui importe le fichier de fournir une source valide, pour que nous puissions vérifier le copyright. Soit le bot qui a importé le fichier à partir de fr a perdu la source, ou alors il n'y en avait pas au départ. En tout cas ce blason est protégé puisqu'il a été adopté en 2000. C'est comme le blason du Canada, tu ne le trouvera pas sur les commons parce qu'il est encore protégé par les droits d'auteurs, sur le wikipedia anglais il est à w:Image:Coat of arms of Canada.svg mais avec une licence qui n'est pas libre. Jackaranga (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Les rosbeefs seraient-il aussi cons que les frogs ?-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 22:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On se passe bien de tes insultes racistes merci. Jackaranga (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ça te blesse ? -- Bertrand GRONDIN → (écrire) 22:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Grondin, outre que ce genre de langage est universellement blessant, il n'apporte rien au débat présent, et tend à empêcher la poursuite de résolution du problème en mettant toutes les personnes impliquées dans un état d'esprit antagoniste (voire même la résolution des problèmes à venir).
Je te demanderai avec insistance, pour le court terme, de mesurer ton langage et de t'abstenir d'écrire sous le coup de la colère ; et pour le moyen terme, de travailler à accepter le fait que les gens qui ne partagent pas ta vision des choses peuvent avoir de bonnes raisons pour ça, et peuvent agir de bonne foi. Rama (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, copyright violation. Kameraad Pjotr 18:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:'Tiger' Matan 1958 - Edmonton 001.jpg et al. (mass deletion request)

[edit]

Author lists that it is "Not copyrighted." However, the source gives no indication that the original source has been released into the public domain. Ian13 (talk) 10:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • 14 further images are also listed for deletion at en.Wikipedia (the original upload location). Ian13 (talk) 10:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment What is the original source of the images? -- Infrogmation (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, all of the uploads had things such as "Dave Wilbur took picture Spokane Fairgrounds Speedway 1971. Not Copyrighted. Public domain. {{PD-self}}", so I can only assume that the images are scans (some, on Wikipedia at least, had white edges from bad cropping). Ian13 (talk) 12:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, These images are from en.wikipedia they have been released into public domain by it's author. Original uploader was User:Nellefson at en.wikipedia . These images were a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia commons so I just checked that they are in Public Domain copied the image information using CommonsHelper uploaded the image and went back to wikipedia and inserted the {{db-i8}} and {{subst:ncd}} tags to indicate that these images are now commons. That's all. To me the images look like a scan just like User:Ian13 said. OpinionPerson (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, and I wasn't intending to imply that you are at fault. I suspect, given the variety of picture authors however, that User:Nellefson does not hold the copyright to release them into the public domain (given the naivety shown by stating they are all 'Not copyrighted.' and providing no rationale for that). Ian13 (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, Yeah I know that you're not saying it was my fault. What would you say should we do know? Contact the original uploader, move the images back to wikipedia, or leave them on commons? OpinionPerson (talk) 20:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, the article that the images were used on has had the bulk of its content removed (including all the images) and the remaining stub is still up for deletion. All of the uploaded files which are still on en.Wikipedia are listed for deletion too. We can contact the original uploader, but really I doubt there is much to add as he isn't listed as the author of any images (I believe), so pd-self is obviously invalid. I think the files should just be deleted. Ian13 (talk) 21:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Additionally, at least one image which was identical was deleted previously as "Public Domain" wasn't sufficient for licensing. In fact, his talk page shows a trail of 9 deleted copyright issues of similar images. Ian13 (talk) 21:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah I agree, {{PD-SELF}} would be invalid, since he did not release the pictures into public domain, because the author did. We even don't know if the author released them into public domain, we've got no evidence. After I moved those Images to Commons I just tagged them for deletion and all of the images I tagged were deleted from Wikipedia. And because you said they are not used on any articles anymore then I think we should delete them. OpinionPerson (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. The original uploader did not react, so there still is no proof that the original authors released the images into PD. Cecil (talk) 12:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete all these images

[edit]
List
Motivations

I'm the uploader of all these pictures, and the author of the vast majority of them. I thought (since I'm the uploader) there wouldn't have been problems with a speedy deletion, but some users state the best way is a normal request of deletion because the images are no longer mine. When I uploaded the pictures I didn't know this policy, I thought I could require the removal whenever I wanted.

I want all those pictures to be deleted because they're low-quality and unuseful (some of my drawings are horrible). Some of them are not mine, they're from Photobucket, where the autor wrote they were free. Unfortunately the account on Photobucket no longer exists, and I can't proof there was a free license. Since I don't want to have problems, please delete also this set of pictures. --Nyo (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Usage

[edit]

These images are indeed very valuable for the Wiki community. Many images are used in various Wikipedias; a subset follows:

fr.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [–]
Yggdrasil dans la culture populaire uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
it.wikipedia.org
- 21 pages [–]
Alex Sanders uses: Alex_Sanders_portrait_1.PNG
Amitistianesimo uses: Lady_Amythyst.PNG
Cocranesimo uses: Four_aspects_of_the_Goddess_1.PNG
Finnismo uses: Ukkousk_symbols_on_stones.PNG
Inglinismo uses: Inglinist_Church_emblem.PNG
Sciacanesimo uses: Shacan_ritual.PNG, Shacanism_logo_red.PNG
Xandrianesimo uses: Alex_Sanders_portrait_1.PNG
Ásatrú uses: Valknut_orange_2.png
User:Petra the Cat uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Template:Sciacanesimo uses: Shacanism_logo_red.PNG
Template:Ásatrú uses: Valknut_orange_2.png
Portale:Etenismo uses: God_Odin_blue.PNG
Portale:Etenismo/Immagine uses: God_Odin_blue.PNG
Portale:Neopaganesimo uses: Pagan_woman.PNG
Portale:Neopaganesimo/Pentacolo uses: Pagan_woman.PNG
Portale:Taoismo uses: Xiantian_symbol.PNG
Portale:Taoismo/Portali correlati uses: Xiantian_symbol.PNG
Portale:Taoismo - Indice uses: Xiantian_symbol.PNG
Portale:Wicca uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
Portale:Wicca/Esbat uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
Discussioni progetto:Religione/icone uses: VoodooDeitySymbol.PNG
pt.wikipedia.org
- 3 pages [–]
Alex Sanders uses: Alex_Sanders_portrait_1.PNG
Portal:Wicca uses: Alex_Sanders_portrait_1.PNG
Portal:Wicca/Biografia Selecionada uses: Alex_Sanders_portrait_1.PNG
es.wikipedia.org
- at least 100 pages [+]
Talk:Coca Guazzini uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
Talk:Daisy Marie uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
Talk:James Potter uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
Talk:La Verdadera Iglesia de Jesús uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
Talk:Nathan Gale uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Discusión:Gusgus/03-07 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Durero/Junio - Agosto 2007 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Durero/Noviembre - Diciembre 2007 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Ensada/Archivo8 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Ensada/Archivo9 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Leo.nunez uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Nehiki uses: Blue_Moon.PNG
User:Techarrow/Discusiones1 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG

User talk:169.139.19.218 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.129.8.24 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.134.30.206 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.140.9.37 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.141.204.152 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.142.230.112 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.144.44.222 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.173.78.115 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:189.175.50.186 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.0.22.89 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.1.168.33 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.129.80.40 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.16.55.145 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.161.22.7 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.161.24.60 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.161.91.13 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.161.91.41 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.24.117.65 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.31.125.50 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.31.61.110 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.37.239.36 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.40.49.159 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.41.5.136 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.41.81.148 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.42.151.145 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.42.25.245 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.44.214.62 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.46.37.34 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.50.146.28 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.65.186.136 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.82.39.8 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.84.0.43 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:190.84.150.223 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:194.179.83.87 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.1.22.22 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.104.131.140 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.104.142.168 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.104.29.176 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.105.162.16 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.105.168.136 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.106.35.201 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.110.133.83 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.111.67.2 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.112.126.196 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.112.18.1 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.112.73.192 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.121.10.81 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.121.200.198 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.121.22.23 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.127.97.83 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.28.73.239 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.30.134.138 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.43.203.34 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.6.212.62 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.64.207.42 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.65.189.144 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.73.14.123 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.83.124.176 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.83.172.87 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.86.3.28 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:200.92.110.226 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.132.203.253 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.139.158.28 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.141.47.106 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.166.40.146 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.170.72.164 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.212.202.168 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.213.162.181 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.214.140.228 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.214.157.168 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.220.222.140 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.223.171.229 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.223.233.84 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.234.229.24 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.239.116.205 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.240.120.169 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.240.161.69 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.240.210.171 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.241.7.198 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.249.227.117 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.250.243.207 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:201.255.9.165 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:207.248.37.251 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:213.37.162.123 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:69.79.236.192 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:71.106.97.205 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG User talk:72.252.64.239 uses: Blue_Moon.PNG

ru.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [+]
Славяно-Арийские Веды uses: Inglinist_Church_emblem.PNG
sv.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [+]
User:Achird/Hedendom uses: Pagan_woman.PNG
fi.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [+]
Template:Perinnesymboli uses: Ukkousk_symbols_on_stones.PNG
tr.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [+]
Ruhsal eşler uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
cs.wikipedia.org
- 33 pages [–]
Baldr uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Dísy uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Einherjové uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Fenrir uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Frey uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Freya uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ginnungagap uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Kenning uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Loki uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Norny uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Poetická Edda uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Prozaická Edda uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ragnarök uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ratatosk uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Runy uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Severská kosmologie uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Severská mytologie uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Seznam lidí, míst a věcí ze severské mytologie uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Seznam severských bohů uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Skald uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Snorri Sturluson uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Thór uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Týr uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Valknut uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Valkýra uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Vanové uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Yggdrasil uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Álfové uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ásové uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ódin uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Čísla v severské mytologii uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Template:Severská mytologie uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Template talk:Severská mytologie uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
he.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [+]

דייוויד ליין: uses: David_Eden_Lane.PNG

gl.wikipedia.org
- 4 pages [+]
Stephen McNallen uses: Valknut_orange_2.png
Sveinbjörn Beinteinsson uses: Valknut_orange_2.png
Ásatrú uses: Valknut_orange_2.png
Template:Ásatrú uses: Valknut_orange_2.png
en.wikiquote.org
- 69 pages [–]
Albert Camus uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Albert Hofmann uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Aldous Huxley uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Aleister Crowley uses: StylizedPentacleSeasons.PNG, Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
American Gods uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Anaïs Nin uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Baruch Spinoza uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Bono uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Bruce Lee uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Buckminster Fuller uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Cyrano de Bergerac uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Dune uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Eden Ahbez uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Edie Brickell uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Edwin Markham uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Felix Adler uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Francis Bacon uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Friedrich Nietzsche uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Fyodor Dostoevsky uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
G. K. Chesterton uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Giordano Bruno uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Henry Kuttner uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Jack Kerouac uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Jalal al-Din Muhammad Rumi uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG, Blue_Moon.PNG
John Carder Bush uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Joyce Kilmer uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Julian Huxley uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Karl Mannheim uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Kate Bush uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ken Wilber uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG, StylizedPentacleSeasons.PNG
Kenneth Rexroth uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Khalil Gibran uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Kurt Vonnegut uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Langdon Smith uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Leaves of Grass uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Loreena McKennitt uses: Blue_Moon.PNG, Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Love uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Margaret Fuller uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Mircea Eliade uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Nikola Tesla uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Nikos Kazantzakis uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Novalis uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Percy Bysshe Shelley uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Peter Kropotkin uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Philip José Farmer uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
R. A. Lafferty uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Ralph Waldo Emerson uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Richard Francis Burton uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Richard Maurice Bucke uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Robert Louis Stevenson uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Simone Weil uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Simone de Beauvoir uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Sri Aurobindo uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Starhawk uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
T. S. Eliot uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Taliesin uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
The Doors of Perception uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
The Two Voices uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Vannevar Bush uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Václav Havel uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Wallace Stevens uses: Blue_Moon.PNG, Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
William Ernest Henley uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
William James uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Project:Quote of the day/August 2008 uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Project:Quote of the day/August 3, 2008 uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Project:Quote of the day/March 2008 uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
Project:Quote of the day/March 3, 2008 uses: Yggdrasil_axis_mundi_1.PNG
an.wikipedia.org
- 1 pages [+]
Template:Wicca/Direutorio uses: WiccanGodYellow.PNG
fi.wikibooks.org
- 1 pages [+]
Maailman uskonnot uses: Religious_texts_collage_small.PNG

--Foroa (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  1.  Keep. As mentioned above many are used, many other are useful and some in the list wasn't even made by you and some wasn't even uploaded by you. I don't think such a blanket request is unsuitable. It would be better to take it in more manageable chunks or on a case by case basis. // Liftarn (talk)
  2.  Delete Only a few pictures among the 300+ listed are used. You can keep those used an delete all the others. --Nyo (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If they are within scope, not copyvios and not dupes or superseded then they should be kept. // Liftarn (talk) 15:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Some are not within scope, others (those from Photobucket) can be considered copyvios because the account is now down (and I suspect the photos of people are actual copyvios). --Nyo (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Delete Delete the most. Maybe keep only this ones which are used and aren't copyvios.--Avron (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Proposed deletion is far too broad, and includes many images in use in multiple Wikimedia projects that I see no valid reason for deletion. (Some individual images or subsets within this group may or may not qualify for deletion, but this broad set as a whole certainly does not. I would suggest closure as keep; individual images or subsets may be relisted seperately as appropriate.) -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete photobucket images  Keep the rest (for now). The photobucket ones absolutely have to go, because the license on photobucket is not free enough (it terminates once the pictures are removed from the site). As for the rest, there are too many to consider at once. Nominate them in smaller chunks. 206.170.102.210 22:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete all, many of them are obviously copyvios. --87.9.84.58 15:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now at least. Nyo asked me to view this discussion and delete these images but I can't feel comfortable doing. This request is far too broad. I've had a quick look through the comments here and a random pick of the images and it seems there is quite a variety of circumstances here. Some are used, some are not used but within project scope, some are from Photobucket with no evidence of the licensing status, and some appear to be from Photobucket with OTRS tickets although I've not reviewed these. There may well be some copyright violations within this bunch and I'll quite happily see those go but I think deleting all of the above images will go beyond addressing this issue. I'd therefore strongly suggest that these are kept for now and would encourage the nominator to create a new deletion request for smaller batches with similar issues. Adambro (talk) 19:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Delete. --87.8.82.153 07:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Why? The administrator closing this discussion will consider the arguments made in relation to the project's policies, simple votes have only limited merit. I note that this vote is this user's only contribution. Adambro (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep until resubmitted in smaller bites... per the reasons above and my comment below. // FrankB 22:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I suggest the user resubmit in smaller groups. Someone has already done a lot of digging indicating which images have been used, so submit listings in smaller groups of thirty or so all those you'd rather change the licensing for is within reason. Aside from that, once one releases something, there really shouldn't be any going back. Technically, you've entered a binding contract, I would guess. As an institution, I would prefer to honor your wishes provided there is no opposition... but obviously when something is used, there is some and the foregoing has a lot of others. // FrankB 22:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Many of those look very shaky on copyright grounds. Image:Priestess Seshen 1.PNG says "The upload of this picture is permitted by the Lycian Sanctuary" but if you follow the link you get "All material in this web site is copyrighted either by the author or the Lycian Sanctuary and may not be used, in any manner, without permission of the copyright holder." It's not used anyway, by all means delete it.
  • Even where there are OTRS submissions I'm not necessarily convinced. Image:Spider Goddess 1.PNG is an artwork by Susan Boulet (1941-1997) and not the "Erkadio" claimed on the image description page. We should delete all the Erkadio images, there are so many different styles of images purportedly by Erkadio that it's clear that they can't all be by the same author. Frankly, I'd be inclined to just go with the uploader's request and  Delete all the images - I doubt any licensing information here can be trusted. Haukurth (talk) 22:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I went ahead and deleted all the Paganeen images for starters. Image:God Odin gray.PNG is actually a 1984 work by Alan Lee. The other artworks were in different styles and very unlikely to be by the same person. None of the photographs had metadata. The Photobucket profile has vanished and the only witness, Nyo, wants the images deleted. I think the level of proof that these were free images was far below what we accept. Haukurth (talk) 19:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. The vast majority of these images have been deleted already. I am deleting the rest based on the arguments by Haukurth. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bajoran insignia

[edit]

Derivative of presumably copyrighted insignia Powers (talk) 12:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. -- Cat ちぃ? 11:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleted. --- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG I made is broken and I don't know how to fix it 790 (talk) 13:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK I got myself together and fixed it so this req can be closed, thx. 790 (talk)

K! Closed. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 01:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably faulty and misleading data. A user on de.WP emailed me about several problems with this map I created, most of them with the trustworthiness of the data source I used, but also systematic errors I made when allocating city districts from the source to the map. So this work of mine is like to be faulty and misleading, and I'd prefer to have it deleted. 790 (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. User request granted. (Unused) Rocket000(talk) 11:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe una imagen de mayor calidad que ésta Traianeum (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qué imagen? / What image? 76.175.162.28 13:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Se trata del Escudo de La Rinconada, creada así mismo por mí.


Kept, please first use User:CommonsDelinker to universally replace. Kameraad Pjotr 20:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe una imagen semejante de mayor calidad Traianeum (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qué imagen? / What image? 76.175.162.28 13:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Se trata del Escudo de La Rinconada, creada así mismo por mí.


Kept, please first use User:CommonsDelinker to universally replace. Kameraad Pjotr 20:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soy el autor de la subida. La he subido por error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobodemadrid (talk • contribs) 17:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Per uploader's request which hasn't been dealt with due to the DR not being filed correctly Bidgee (talk) 08:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]