User talk:Adamantios

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

FPC candidate

[edit]

Howdy! per your comments on the FP nomination page, I've located the original image and uploaded it. It's less striking as a thumbnail, though the added resolution and surrounding whitespace probably help it as a composition. Please check again to see if this new image satisfies the requirements. If not, I'd appreciate any comments on how to improve the image (or any direct help!), since I'm fairly inexperienced at this, and don't have a particularly good eye for composition. :) GeeJo 23:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stone-bridge-forest-xanthi.jpg

[edit]

Hope you dont mind I have nominated this as one of Commons:Quality Images, if you know of any other images that meet the Commons:Quality images guidelines then nominate them at Commons:Quality images candidates ...Gnangarra 07:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden-plank-and-nailed-alum-sheet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse-at-window-0A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-panorama-mitte-2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kodak-No1-through-the-bellows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thraciae-veteris-typvs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Species identification

[edit]

Species identification is important for QI and FP, especially if the organism is prominent. BTW, the pretty mantis you found is a Sphodromantis viridis, Mantis religiosa has a typical black and white spot on the coxa, S. viridis can amongst other things, be recognized by the pale spot on the proximal part of its elytrae. Lycaon 17:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction and the advice! It's comforting to know that some people like you will help in this regard. I find it quite difficult to properly identify species. Adamantios 18:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No probs. I try, but it is not always easy with only the internet to search. For some taxa I have identification guides (like for North Sea Polychaetes ;-) ), but for others it is mostly a matter of research and looking at the fine details. Regards. Lycaon 18:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mecaflex-camera-HDR-BW-0b.jpg

[edit]

I did an edit of Image:Mecaflex-camera-HDR-BW-0b.jpg with the background brightened and the bright spot on the camera darkened. Tell me what you think or if I made any mistakes. Thegreenj 20:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi greenj, thanks for the effort! I think I prefer the soft grey tone of the background in the original, it makes it a bit easier for the eyes. Of course many people might prefer the other version, you never know. Regards, Adamantios 10:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mantis-greece-alonisos-0a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mecaflex-camera-HDR-BW-0b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ampere-o-meter-vintage-HDR-0h.jpg

[edit]

I am right now uploading a rotated and centered version of this image. I am uploading it to the same name so if you do not like the changes -- please be sure to revert them. Darn, if I had waited 11 minutes, the upload time would have been the same as the width.

I have hindsight issues....

Great image, btw. -- carol 12:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Carol, I'm glad you like it, it took me hours to get it right. I generally prefer to upload with a different filename, unless it's an old picture used all over the wiki space. Never mind, it's probably not so important :) Adamantios 21:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then I shamelessly stole your linux box. You can keep that Jungian thing though.... -- carol 18:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ampere-o-meter-vintage-HDR-0h.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umbrella-orange-textile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, quality good enough -- Alvesgaspar 14:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) It's a lovely image. Arria Belli | parlami 16:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

QIC

[edit]

Just FYI, you don't have to move to CR anymore. Just put a discuss in the template and the bot will move it on its next round to CR. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 16:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the wake-up call, Lycaon! Best regards, adamantios (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure. Lycaon (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Red-crocus-thread-greek.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Red-crocus-thread-greek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

adamantios (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Gyps-rueppellii-rueppells-vulture-0a.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Gyps-rueppellii-rueppells-vulture-0a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

adamantios (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Gyps-himalayensis-himalayan-griffon-vulture-0b.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Gyps-himalayensis-himalayan-griffon-vulture-0b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

adamantios (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Gyps-himalayensis-himalayan-griffon-vulture-0a.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Gyps-himalayensis-himalayan-griffon-vulture-0a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

adamantios (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinops-sphaerocephalus-bumblebee-0a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sufficient DOF, and the noise doesn't ruin it. –Dilaudid 19:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radio recievers

[edit]

Ooops sorry, that was me-- entering a bot command to loose inappropriate captialization, and I made a typo in the process. I'll clean it up if it hasn't been already. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, things happen! Thanks for taking care of it. Regards, adamantios (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful images

[edit]

Hello ! I am quite impressed by the quality of your images. If I may make a suggestion, it would be to write binomial names in italic and with a link: for instance Echinops sphaerocephalus instead of Echinops sphaerocephalus. I have changed this in some of your pictures. Yours, Frédéric (talk) 11:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kindness, it's encouraging. I often find that there's a surplus of hostility and rudeness in Commons and Wikipedia. It's good to be reminded that it's not necessarily so! I'll follow your advice regarding binomial names. Thanks again, adamantios (talk) 16:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I second that. I have played with one of your images for my website. You can see the result here: [1] :-) notafish }<';> 12:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Not-a-fish! "Small planet, global village", now that's an interesting variation! You might as well upload it to commons. Best regards, adamantios (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimping-pliers-pro-RJ-0a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks perfect to me. - Till.niermann 05:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Free space optical communications transceiver.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

eduNET proxies

[edit]

{{unblock|1=IP address 194.63.235.157 is one of the filtering proxies used by the Greek schools network ([http://www.db.ripe.net/whois?form_type=simple&full_query_string=&searchtext=194.63.160.0+-+194.63.239.255&do_search=Search]). This block affects a great number of potential contributors and ultimately the very people that we should encourage to get involved. Please reconsider. Regards, [[User:Adamantios|adamantios]] ([[User talk:Adamantios#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)}}

✓ Approved based on the fact that the IP was never used for vandalism previously, and it was only given a year block which would have expired here shortly. _IF_ there is vandalism, the IP will promptly get reblocked. I'd suggest to your users to sign up for accounts - after all you can't upload on commons without an account. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 21:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the swift response. I found myself unable to edit even though I was logged in. Furthermore there are two more proxies (194.63.235.156 and 194.63.235.155) serving this region that weren't blocked, as far as I can tell. I think they are load-balancing, so it was only a matter of chance for your traffic to go through the blocked one. I do understand your concerns, ofcourse. Regards, adamantios (talk) 21:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Used one of your images

[edit]

Hi,I just wanted to let you know that I used one of your images on one of my blogs: http://tamss60.tamoggemon.com/2009/01/07/nokia-no-firmware-updates-against-curse-of-silence/ Please contact me at tamhan AT tamoggemon DOT com if you have any questions! All the best Tam Hanna

Thank you for taking the time to notify me, it gives a sense of appreciation! Kind regards, adamantios (talk) 18:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radio-frequency-anechoic-chamber-HDR-0a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture, light ok, very good illustration of the subject--Lucarelli 23:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SFF-8484-internal-connector-0a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks great to me. --Notyourbroom 23:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDDI-optical-fiber-connector-hdr-0a.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I just want to let you know that I have nominated your picture File:FDDI-optical-fiber-connector-hdr-0a.jpg for QI. Good work! -- H005 (talk) 10:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you H005 :) Whether they actually promote it or not, your positive feedback is much appreciated. Best regards, adamantios (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mother-spider-and-spiderlings-0a.jpg

[edit]

For the part that I can see... look really like 'my' en:Hogna radiata, shot in France. We can say just using what we see. At least, they should be closely relate. PS: I like picture on white background. I made some tools for myself, feel free to use them. Yug (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, your feedback is appreciated! She was very tame and allowed me to carry her inside and take a few pictures on a sheet of paper. I'm not active lately on Wikimedia, but I'll definitely take a look at your tools. Regards, adamantios (talk) 10:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:X25-network-diagram-0a.svg

[edit]

hi, could u tell me which font is used in this picture (the "x.25 network" part)? i like it and just being curious --Aaa3-other (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm afraid it's too long ago for me to remember. What I can tell you, though, is that I used en:Inkscape. If you search for font definitions within the SVG, you will find the following: "-inkscape-font-specification:Times New Roman;". Hope that helps. Regards, adamantios (talk) 19:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ok, ty :) (o, the thing is, that yes before asking it here, i opened and found that line just didnt believe it; remembered that font to something totally different, but now as i opened up wordpad it looks very similar so now i believe its that ... still feel surprised bit though, but nvm) thanks, aaa

International Photoworkshop

[edit]

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nortel_DMS100_public_voice_exchange.jpg

[edit]
File:Nortel_DMS100_public_voice_exchange.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Edokter (talk) — 21:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Digital Equipment Corporation employee coffee mug.jpg

[edit]
File:Digital Equipment Corporation employee coffee mug.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot-air-balloon-basket-legacy.jpg

[edit]
File:Hot-air-balloon-basket-legacy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.150.52.187 21:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped upload of File:Carousel-slide-projector-0a.jpg

[edit]

Hi there,

I've uploaded a cropped version of your photo, File:Carousel-slide-projector-0a.jpg over the original filename. I haven't altered the intended subject (the projector and projected image itself).

If you're unhappy with this change, or there was a particular reason for including the chair, please feel free to revert it, and I'll upload the modified version as a separate file.

Thanks for the upload, and all the best! Ubcule (talk) 18:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cd-player-top-loading-and-DAC.jpg

[edit]
File:Cd-player-top-loading-and-DAC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

173.16.126.209 17:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adamantios&oldid=879145863"