Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/29

28 November 2024

30 November 2024

Deletion requests on 29 November 2024

November 29

File:Logo-paris8-couleurs-officielles.jpg

Neither license on the image is correct and COM:TOO France is very low, so this might not be pd-textlogo either. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je crois qu’il y a une dérogation pour ces logos d’université en France. Voir le fichier qui était précédemment utilisé pour le même article. ÉducNatUniv (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ceci était le précédent logo qui bénéficiait d’une dérogation : « https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paris_VIII.svg#mw-jump-to-license ». ÉducNatUniv (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ce fichier peut être supprimé : il est désormais remplacé par [1].

In English: this file can be deleted; it has just been replaced by the following one [2]. ÉducNatUniv (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg

Unused duplicate of File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg. Please consider renaming/moving File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg to File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg. Check out Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg for more details about the deletion. Not intended to instigate an edit war. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I tagged the file as the duplicate. Anybody seeing this needs to delete the duplicate file and rename/move File:Emblem of Takashima, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg to File:Emblem of Takashima, Nishisonogi, Nagasaki (1996–2005).svg, in order to retain the characteristics of the duplicate file. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 14:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Prussia 1933.svg

Incorrect version of the emblem in the center. See also factual accuracy template on the file page and the evidence on the linked file. Proposing deletion and subsequently a redirect to the other file. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 04:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:North Tower in 2024.jpg

FOP in Bangladesh for buildings was revoked since 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per this discussion. The new act is still unclear and awaiting for clear interpretation from lawyers. The FOP was updated before the issue was solved. We need to wait till it clears. Borhan (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The person who started the discussion later updated the copyright rules page for Bangladesh, and nobody seemed to have any objections to it. Since we do not take any chances with copyright, I believe the image should be deleted in accordance with the updated rules.Syrus257 (talk) 08:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RSS Flag (Bhagwa Dhwaja).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Ratnahastin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from here and tagged as in public domain when clearly it is a computer generated imagery and not an image from 1925 as the documentation claims.. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have made some fixes according to my understanding. This is simply a work that anyone can create on computer therefore is ineligible for copyright. Therefore, I have fixed the licensing accordingly. If someone believes that it is a copyvio, then I would myself request to delete it ASAP. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works, unless the original creator releases it here we can't keep it.Ratnahastin (talk) 09:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that's not how it works. There is no rule that requires the original creator to themselves release it here. Just like US Federal works are released by US govt and we take it from there website and upload it here. Anyways this is just a simple work which anyone can make on a computer. So PD-ineligible applies. ShaanSengupta^Talk 13:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you created it? You clearly took it from somewhere like the link I mentioned above. You do not have the rights to upload it. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even works by different departments of Govt of India are not created by me. But I absolutely have all the rights to upload it if they are under free licence. I have not marked that as my own work that will require it to be my creation. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 14:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have provided no evidence that this is a work by the government or the organisation itself released under a free license. Until proof is provided that it is not a copyright violation it should be deleted.Ratnahastin (talk) 14:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio is for works that are protected by copyright. I find myself repeating. This is a simple drawing which even you can create on your computer. Therefore this comes under PD-ineligible. So there is no need for this to be released as such. This is what I make of this. As I said if it is a vio it will be deleted when some admin closes this discussion. So let's leave it here. Thank you and bye from my side. ShaanSengupta^Talk 14:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a "simple drawing" created by a person that has not released it under a free licence. Assuming that the link of the site I provided is the oldest instance of it, it falls under copyright. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:TOO. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 15:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senso gietvloeren logo.svg

no author no permission copyvio from https://senso.com Hoyanova (talk) 07:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue af Bresemann.jpg

I have been informed by another user that I should not have uploaded this picture because the sculptor has not yet been dead for 70 years. Økonom (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:GIF IT UP

I can find no evidence of free licence for GIF on the source website.

RoyZuo (talk) 09:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. See the rules of the GIF IT UP contest. — Racconish ^💬 10:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The rules say "Entries... grant the contest organisers the right to assign a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence to this work. Entries... will also be assigned a CC BY 4.0 licence..."

The people submitting their works granted the contest organisers the right, but the contest organisers do not appear to have actually assigned free licences to the GIF. The 2nd sentence uses future tense, which means it has not happened.

There's no mention of the licence on the website (not in footer or a "copyright"/"terms of use" page), or on individual GIF's page. No indication that any text or image on that website is free. RoyZuo (talk) 11:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is an imperative future. The French and German versions use a present tense. See also here : "En participant, vous acceptez que votre GIF soit publié sur le site du concours [...] Votre GIF sera placé sous licence Creative Commons (CC-BY ou CC-BY-SA)". — Racconish ^💬 16:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "contest organisers" need to mark either the GIF or the website like https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Marking_your_work_with_a_CC_license . RoyZuo (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your frustration. My own understanding of this unexpectedly sloppy situation is (1) they take for granted everybody accepts to submit their contribution under a Creative Commons license but (2) they want to give some flexiblility. Therefore it defaults to CC-BY or CC-BY-SA depending on the source material and they give contributors the option to put their GIF under a NC license. Therefore the end result is Commons compatible unless a NC license is specified. — Racconish ^💬 14:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Yavapai-Prescott Tribe.svg

This file was initially tagged by Intervex as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation - this is a copyrighted flag in the USA.|2=https://www.ypit.com/about_ypit.htm Uploaded in 2007, in used. Yann (talk) 10:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the tribe's website is currently down. The URL is archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20241128223829/https://www.ypit.com/about_ypit.htm - there's a clear "Copyright © 2002, The Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe" placed right beside the flag on their website. I'm reasonably sure it's above Threshold of Originality, and being from 2002 it is copyrightable. I was unable to find evidence this is freely licensed. Intervex (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it and transfer it to the tribe's Wikipedia article. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sounds like a plan to me. Intervex (talk) 06:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The new era in South Africa, with an examination of the Chinese labour question (IA newerainsouthafr00markiala).pdf

Book first published in London and the author died in 1959. While the work is PD in the US, it will not be in the public domain in the UK until 2030. Ciridae (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:マルシンプリンバニラプリン.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 10:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source is "own work," backed up by an EXIF. I don't understand this deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:茶のしずく(饅頭).jpg

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 10:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source is "own work," backed up by an EXIF. I don't understand this deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lambang Kesultanan Jambi.jpg

It doesn't seem to be the symbol of the Jambi Sultanate. It is suspected that this is just a new creation and has no history in the Jambi Sultanate, and could even cause fake news. Muhamad Izzul Fiqih (talk) 12:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE on 8 Wikipedia articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADUST Campus 2.jpg

No FOP in Bangladesh since 18 September 2023. See COM:FOP Bangladesh. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree as of this discussion the new act is still unclear and awaiting for clear interpretation from lawyers. The FOP was updated before the issue was solved and still we didn’t get into specific decision. We need to wait till it clears. Mehedi Abedin 12:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Until what clears? Per the COM:Precautionary principle, Commons hides files when the copyright situation is unclear and then unhides them if it's clearly OK to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADUST Campus 3.jpg

No FOP in Bangladesh since 18 September 2023. See COM:FOP Bangladesh. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree as of this discussion the new act is still unclear and awaiting for clear interpretation from lawyers. The FOP was updated before the issue was solved and still we didn’t get into specific decision. We need to wait till it clears. Mehedi Abedin 12:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADUST Campus with bus.jpg

No FOP in Bangladesh since 18 September 2023. See COM:FOP Bangladesh. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree as of this discussion the new act is still unclear and awaiting for clear interpretation from lawyers. The FOP was updated before the issue was solved and still we didn’t get into specific decision. We need to wait till it clears. Mehedi Abedin 12:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exemple d'une tunisienne qui fait une pipe sans préservatif.png

I’m not buying that this person actually went to Tunisia to get a blowjob Dronebogus (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere did I say I went to Tunisia. So the reason this file is getting deleted is because you’re “not buying it”? But buying what? Like I said, I never said I went there, and it has nothing do —- so you’re Deletion Request basis is set on what you personally think, imagine or interpret. Hence discussion revolved around this, and thus answered. Miguel Angel Omaña Rojas (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have to buy it, its free to use. --RAN (talk) 01:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Novo Theatre, Dhaka , Bangladesh.jpg

No FOP in Bangladesh since 18 September 2023. See COM:FOP Bangladesh. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Novo Theatre, Bangladesh.jpg

No FOP in Bangladesh since 18 September 2023. See COM:FOP Bangladesh. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 12:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It was captured when there was an FOP in place. — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 18:12, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:StrongFrancesWebb.jpg

Unlikely own work, seems to be re-photographed from an unknown source, which may be copyrighted. Gumruch (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I own the original portrait. It is a picture of a portrait of her that she owned and was passed to me.

It is the only copy I am aware of and neither is there any copyright on it that I am aware of. Nbstrong (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Щиголь.МедіаЦентр.jpg

No evidence of authorship or free licensing provided on Commons for this image. Redtree21 (talk) 12:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Digitalizacija omogućila pretraživanje knjižnog fonda kroz program COBISS.jpg

Dear @Redtree21,

The uploaded files by the user Dejan Dima were uploaded as part of the Wikipedian in residence project in cooperation with the Public Library "Bora Stankovic". All photos uploaded are his earlier work and he is the absolute owner of the copyright. For all photos where a notice of copyright infringement template has been placed, we will deliver a written permission during the next week, and an OTRS pending template has been placed on them. Is there any other way we can help?

Best regards,

Gorana Gomirac, GLAM Manager at Wikimedia Serbia Gorana Gomirac (VMRS) (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The South African scene (IA southafricanscen00mark).pdf

Book first published in London in 1913 and the author died in 1959. While the work is PD in the US, it will not be in the public domain in the UK until 2030. Ciridae (talk) 14:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Endgueltig.jpg

Cover .. 200.39.139.10 14:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader's username (Meinlabel) is equivalent to the name of the record label by which this album was published ("mein Label"). See German Wikipedia article on this rapper: de:Taichi (Rapper) (the relevant sentence with emphasis added by me: "Taichi ist Geschäftsführer des Labels „mein Label“, über das er auch seine eigenen Tonträger veröffentlicht.") -- Nakonana (talk) 18:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deyverson.png

File is not Creative Commons: https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/blogs/mauricio-noriega/esportes/futebol/atletico-mineiro/a-saudavel-maluquice-de-deyverson-faz-bem-ao-futebol/ NullReason (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANFOX Logo RGB.svg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo. It is not an obvious speedy deletion candidate IMHO but has some originality in the wave so my opinion is to delete it. Royal broil 14:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per COM:G7. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the reason for deletion request is, that the logo has some originality. Here we have to check, whether we use the rule for deletion correct for logos. If this logo has some originality, most company logos - which are not only pure text-logos - has some originality.

In my point of view the reason for deletion is not appropriate for this logo. The request for deletion should be rejected. 86199DocB (talk) 21:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:People media factory logo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Bobby Cohn as Logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the copyright notice on the bottom of the website given as the source in the file: http://peoplemediafactory.com/ but tagged as CC BY-SA 4.0. Might be fair use, but then shouldn't be on commons. In my opinion, its too complex to qualify for textlogo, but I will admit that I have limited experience in this. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, either. It is a notable company per w:People Media Factory, I think, even if that article was written for pay, but that doesn't address COM:TOO India. --- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karin Lorenz-Lindemann.png

no own work 2003:E5:FF17:CE14:A18C:1E87:73D4:BA64 15:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meta data adjusted. This picture is from Karin's personal photo library. She authorized me (her son, Benjamin Lorenz) to use it for her Wikipedia page. Bjjl2304 (talk) 11:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bjjl2304 that's not the meta data, that's the "file description" that has been adjusted. The meta data is a table at the very bottom of the file page and it cannot be adjusted via Commons: File:Karin_Lorenz-Lindemann.png#metadata (you might need to click the "show extended details" button to see the meta data). What you need to do, if you don't want this file to be deleted, is to contact COM:VRT (or rather: your father, who seems to be the photographer of this photo, needs to send an email to VRT where he grants permission to publish this photo under the stated cc-by-sa-4.0 license). Nakonana (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das ganze kann man auch auf Deutsch nachlesen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/de und um den Genehmigungsprozess zu vereinfachen gibt es E-Mail Mustervorlagen und Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator als Hilfsmittel. Nakonana (talk) 18:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:West Thottathodu Bridge.jpg

Need to remove due to wrong file name Varghesepunnamada (talk) 16:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've renamed the file. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, that's never a necessary reason for deletion. Varghesepunnamada, please have a look at COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Iwaqarhashmi. Varghesepunnamada (talk) 01:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modern Reykjavik Church - panoramio - TumbleCow.jpg

No FoP in Iceland, while the church has entered the PD (architect Guðjón Samúelsson died in 1950), the sign in front is not A1Cafel (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sign is a simple silhouette that can be blurred or cropped out. Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please blur or crop. Krd 06:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1996 Pete Seeger letter to Larry Richmond requesting his name be legally removed from "We Shall Overcome" and "Guantanamera".jpg

Apparent copyvio: marked as "own work" by uploader, who does not appear to be Pete Seeger. The image is a low-quality screenshot from a website. I can't find the source of the image; the letter was in evidence in We Shall Overcome Foundation v. The Richmond Organization, Inc., 2017 WL 3981311 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2017), which may be connected. See also the deletion request for File:Pete_Seeger_signature_(cropped).jpg, which is a derivative. Marnanel (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Isaias Gamboa, the founder and president of the We Shall Overcome Foundation(WSOF). In 2016 WSOF, won a landmark class action lawsuit against the Richmond Organization that freed the iconic protest anthem, We Shall Overcome, from 60 years of unlawful control and exploitation by the Richmond Organization, Pete Seeger, Frank Hamilton, Guy Carawan and Myles Horton, and rendered the anthem a public domain work. The following item; "1996 Pete Seeger letter to Larry Richmond requesting his name be legally removed from "We Shall Overcome" and "Guantanamera" aka "Exhibit 44 Case 1:16-cv-02725-DLC Document 56-38 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 3" was filed on June 20, 2017 in the Southern District of New York, and entered into the public record during this case. Pete Seeger is the author of this document. Seeger passed away in 2014, two years after we interviewed him in person in connection with a documentary film about my research into the true origins of We Shall Overcome. This item was submitted by myself to Wikimedia Commmons and is retrievable through Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER.) As the lead plaintiff in the above lawsuit, I know exactly where and how to retrieve this document. However, to know and understand this song's true history, it is in the public's best interest to know how to find, analyze, and access it freely and without cost. Isaias24 (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This seems like a valuable historical document. It would be good to keep it if we can. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pete Seeger signature (cropped).jpg

Cropped from File:1996 Pete Seeger letter to Larry Richmond requesting his name be legally removed from "We Shall Overcome" and "Guantanamera".jpg, q.v. Marnanel (talk) 17:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Periódico semanal Helvecia - Viernes 29 de noviembre.jpg

Derivative photo of copyrighted newspaper Atomicdragon136 (talk) 18:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/insource:"39082734@N02"

Likely Flickrwashing. The Flickr account, without followers, collects images from actor Usama Mukwaya.

Günther Frager (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowen Yang Wicked Special Screening in NY.jpg

Commons:License laundering - Source stated they don't own video image extracted from so release not valid.

Source is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vats99jHZEo where the description states

All materials provided by EPK.TV.

All rights, title and interest to the Materials, including the copyrights and trademarks therein, shall at all times be and remain with the studio and any other co-owner(s) of such copyrights and trademarks in the Materials.

Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-11-26 11 14 17-George Zoltan Lefton — Mozilla Firefox.png

Photograph created in 1939, we need more information about the photo to determine actual copyright status, not an own work of the uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my family's photograph of my father's brother, my uncle. Please do not delete. 2601:243:823:EEAA:5DA3:342E:89F2:ABF9 13:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some information on where this was first published, it could help determine what the copyright status is. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TanApc.png

Own work claim, but it's definitely not. I can't say for sure where the user found it, but maybe it was from here and there is the photo labeled with Dror Arzi. Please read also the TOU of israeldefence.co.il איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 20:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:شعار التعداد السكاني 2024.jpg

شعار له حقوق. Mohammed Qays 🗣 20:25, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

الشعار في النطاق العام، ضمن إعلام التعداد السكاني، وكوني موظف تعداد أتحاسب على ذلك. Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmadf.alabbasi هل يمكنك تزويدي برابط أو موقع يضعه بالنطاق العام؟

اما كونك موظف فهذا لا يعني انك صاحب حقوق هذه الصورة، أما صاحب الحقوق هو مصمم الشعار. Mohammed Qays 🗣 11:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethnicity of Qazvin province.jpg

Esfarvarin ans shal and Takestan, Segzabad is TAT people. (Wrong and false map) Qazvingram (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per COM:INUSE. Argue about the map at fa.wikipedia.org and/or its talk page, and you can put a content disputed template on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map has Deleting the people of Tat these areas. It has no source and is purely a personal work. Esfarvarin, Takestan, Danesfehan, Segzabad, Shal is Tat people Qazvingram (talk) 20:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anos 1960s, Administração Geral do Porto de Lisboa. Homenagem ao Tenente-Coronel Jaime Filipe da Fonseca, que lá tinha sido comandante.jpg

unclear copyright status, false authorship statement Polarlys (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unclear, as an image search will tell you, only other instance it shows up is:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/lusitania.historiaemilitaria/posts/1805915296245684/

Now, as per the facebook comment section, I, facebook user Bernardo Luz, asked for permission for use of a publically shared photo, permission also given publically, then went on a private interview with Joaquim Salvado Santos, grandson of the chief of police who ordered the picture taken, person under the photo frame.

I'm interested on how to carry forward, since he has privately shared other photos of his archive that he has given me permission to use. RustyRapier (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is the (unnamed) photographer. Polarlys (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How could that be true? The unnamed photographer was clearly working for the state, specifically at the behest of the commanding officer, Joaquim Augusto. And, of course, the physical proprietor is his grandson.RustyRapier (talk) 14:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MB 6616.jpg

possible copyvio © Meikel Bennett - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M2k~dewiki: what is your evidence of copyright? Dmartin969 (talk) 04:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The information at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:MB_6616.jpg&oldid=963428599 says:

Owner: Meikel Bennett M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:07, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I imagine that's the uploader's name. Dmartin969 (talk) 07:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/29

November 29

Files in Category:GIF IT UP

Files found with Special:Search/insource:"39082734@N02"

Navigation menu

Search