Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/30

29 October 2024

31 October 2024

Deletion requests on 30 October 2024

October 30

Files created by SantanaZ and Minorax

File:Movimiento Popular Alternativo VE.jpg (user created by SantanaZ)
File:2019 Canadian North logo.svg (user created by Minorax)

Estas imagenes no forman parte de Commons:Threshold of originality la primera foto el logo no es simple porque aparece el símbolo de una mano (hand) y la 2 según el DR (el símbolo de un hombre no es simple) , realmente ellos violan los derechos de autor (copyright) AbchyZa22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbchyZa22 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safwan sutaji (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sTM81AzfbLM/UrkucMru1CI/AAAAAAAABUE/JlXu-lFeMUQ/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/DSC_0025.JPG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. we need at least an OTRS ticket. Ruthven (msg) 11:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Safwan sutaji (talk · contribs)

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images and COM:DW.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mood animation.gif

Unused animation without purpose or context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moeda (17205567270).jpg

COM:DW and no context, no educaitonal value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:More conferencing! (3849935430).jpg

Unused photo of nondescript event/people, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mottenfalle IMG 1096.jpg

Unused random close-up photo of some form, no context, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mrodakkstto Hatawer.jpg

Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. And likely COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pasillo de acceso desde la torre de los espejos por las almenas de la muralla sur...hacia " El Baluarte del Saliente.jpg

Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:پیش نویس کامران محمدی.pdf

Out of scope: unused PDF printout of a draft article on fawiki. Omphalographer (talk) 02:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pik-50 (talk · contribs)

Unused low-quality blurry photos, unusable, and redundant to numerous better alternatives already in its category.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muro pichado (17160167818).jpg

Unused low quality photo of nondescript building, no context, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MVI 0189.MOV.00 40 34 04.Imagen fija001.jpg

Unused random photo of some signs on a door, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's identified in Spanish: "Puerta de ingreso al Laboratorio en el edificio de la UTN-Santa Fe". I don't speak a lot of Spanish, but I know that means "Entrance (door) to the laboratory in the UTN-Santa Fe Building." When I did a web search on UTN-Santa Fe, this was the first result: Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Now, the real issue could be that Argentina (which I figure .ar stands for in the university's URL) has a pretty restrictive COM:TOO, so their logo on the door might be a problem in that regard, but it is not a random sign on a door with no imaginable educational use, and I think it could be in scope but may not be within COM:TOO Argentina. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NA2014-final.jpg

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google translation: Logo of the National Archives of the United Arab Emirates. Might be in scope, but definitely above COM:TOO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niñosespecialesrd.png

Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screengrab. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Horakiomartin (talk · contribs)

Unused personal documents, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1979 TCMA Japanese Pro Baseball cards

Copyvio. These were published with copyright notice. You can see the notice at the bottom of the reverse side of the card here. This user has a pattern of this behavior. See here --Denniscabrams (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, genuine mistake. Not sure how I missed that. No contest here to deletion. Captain Parmenter (talk) 22:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though to your point about a "pattern of behavior" — I do feel compelled to note that not all of the linked examples were uploaded by me, nor are the circumstances of their pending deletion the same (though I concede that yes, it appears PD-US-78-89 does not apply). Not that it bears mentioning for this request, but a minor clarification. Captain Parmenter (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Note circulaire 002-2017 Republique du Tchad.jpg

Unused text doc, out of scope. Also added:

File:Note circulaire №0008 Ministère des Affaires étrangères de Centrafrique.jpg

--P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Notre Histoire.png

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nonomuller (talk · contribs)

Original research, or personal images without educational use. The article was deleted on the French Wikipedia. Regards,

Yann (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 15:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nonomuller (talk · contribs)

Unused text images, logos, and low-res diagrams without context, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Adeleuzi (talk · contribs)

Logos above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nz polygon number4.PNG

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KamranSamadov19988991 (talk · contribs)

Unused text table and low-res diagrams without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mhuene (talk · contribs)

Unused logo and promotional product image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PakejTonton.png

Advertising, out of scope. Also added logo:

File:Logotonton.jpg

--P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panotur360 imagen corporativa.svg

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK 東涌 Tung Chung 迎禧路 Ying Hei Road Century Link mall shop Fusion by ParknShop Supermarket March 2022 Px3 09.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 04:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK TKO 將軍澳南 Tseung Kwan O South 唐俊街 21 Tong Chun Street 海翩滙 Papillons Square shop Tak Wah Dispensary March 2022 Px3 02.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 04:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO 寶琳 Po Lam 新都城中心商場 Metro City Plaza MCP Two Central mall shop 實惠家居 PriceRite March 2022 Px3 07.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 04:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK TKO 寶琳 Po Lam MCP 新都城中心 Metro City Plaza One mall shop 口果店 snack food 廣良興 Kwong Leung Hing March 2022 Px3 19.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 04:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not de minimis, the japanese packaging are COM:DW メイド理世 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK WC 灣仔 Wan Chai 軒尼詩道 308 Hennessy Road 集成中心 C C Wu Building basement ParknShop Supermarket goods Lee Chun Tong Yuen March 2022 Px3.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 04:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket fridge, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tamoufrde (talk · contribs)

Out of scope

--Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 04:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stade d'Ebimpé.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stade Olympique Alassane Ouattara d'Ebimpé Abidjan.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secretary Blinken Attends Côte d’Ivoire-Equatorial Guinea Men’s Africa Cup of Nations Match - 53479835647.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Tour Map of Lian Hua Zhuang.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023-07-06 Introduction of Binhu Subdistrict, Huzhou 湖州滨湖街道简介 01.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chabaidao x Honkai Star Rail ads.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom メイド理世 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Futian Election Poster.png

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Longyang Road Station Sign (Shanghai Maglev).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nanjing Institute of Posts and Telecommunications (2002).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naozhou Lighthouse - P1580075.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Identity V graffiti.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hongqiao Road Station Sign (Line 3 & 4) 2.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hongqiao Road Station Sign (Line 3 & 4) 3.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CSP 2017 Campaign Action (36990174782).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CSP 2017 Campaign Action (37021074291).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Yaohua Glass Factory in Qinhuangdao 01 2015-09.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel 我对删除这些图像没有意见，凡是有条件的，我都会自己画一张取代它（CAD、SKP、Adobe AI、PS这些我也都会用），即使删掉了，我也还会用该文件名再次上传。--猫猫的日记本 (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skyline artwork at Kalauao - Oʻahu Sunset.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a 2D artwork, it's an embossed, extruding, three-dimensional mosaic created with tiles. The plaque reads "Glass Mosaic, 2021". –Fpmfpm (talk) 08:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skyline artwork at Kualakaʻi - Cherished Are the Hala and Koʻoloa ʻUla of Kualakaʻi.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the other artwork on this rail line. This isn't a 2D artwork, it's an embossed, extruding, three-dimensional mosaic created with tiles. The plaque reads "Glazed Ceramic, 2021". –Fpmfpm (talk) 09:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tlingit & Haida Totem 126.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhua District 西門町 Ximen Ding night March 2024 R12S 201.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW 台灣 Taiwan 台北市 Taipei 萬華區 Wanhua District 西門町 Ximen Ding night March 2024 R12S 200.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:제주드림타워.jpg

this hotel & resort "Jeju Dream Tower" is already complete with construction. this picture is not official one as well. on behalf of Jeju Dream Tower, please remove this picture. Younganda14 (talk) 05:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We don't delete photos of things just because they've changed since the photo was taken. Omphalographer (talk) 06:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I agree with the above comment about not deleting photos just because something the photographed subject has changed since being photographed, there's only limited freedom of panorama for buildings in Korea per COM:FOP South Korea. Commons requires that the content it hosts not be subject to non-commercial use restrictions per COM:LJ. So, unless it's common practice under South Korean copyright law to treat buildings under construction as "non-building structures", it doesn't seem as if this file can be kept. The same thing would also seem to apply to File:제주드림타워정면.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Marchjuly. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The rationale is without merit, and the building as shown is a mere box. I doubt that's copyrightable as a design, in SK or anywhere else. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:제주드림타워정면.jpg shows the same building. Either both are ok, or both are out. They are used on the same page at ko.wikipedia.org --C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 23:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memories of Puhuangyu mural at L14 Puhuangyu Station (20170406132524).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 05:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Quanzhou Confucian Temple 01 2019-10.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 05:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mickeil IMG 1457 (15642919811).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mickeil IMG 1483 (15645766395).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maladrerie de Saint-Riom de Bréhat.jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myakumyaku CraneGame 20240916.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stuffed animals at the Ohio State Fair - DPLA - 0707e8e7721a382a45bbbb466ed0c15f.jpg

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure any one toy here is actually prominent and clear enough to be problematic. I think this might be a rare case of a picture of toys that would be OK. - Jmabel ! talk 14:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AKIBA - Antwerp-Central - 12-12-2023 2.jpg

The banner in the vending machine is a temporary display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom メイド理世 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajko Grlić a la Mostra de València 2024 6.jpg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article CurlingMan13 (talk) 06:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of this user's deletion requests should be taken seriously. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is not "nonsense" and usability in a Wikipedia article is not a requirement for Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajko Grlić a la Mostra de València 2024 12.jpg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article CurlingMan13 (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiona Hill lecture at Lafayette Square.jpg

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article CurlingMan13 (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a bit harsh for a poster promoting a talk by a notable foreign policy scholar, I think. Maybe it's not immediately useful, but I could see it being used on articles about the US response to the War in Ukraine, Fiona Hill's own page, or the Brookings Institution if someone wanted to demonstrate their social reach. Oganguly (talk) 10:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it is certainly not nonsense, and usability in a Wikipedia article is not a requirement for Commons.

There may be a copyright issue, especially with the photo on the poster, but that would be a totally separate issue from the grounds given here. - Jmabel ! talk 15:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Bond Gunbarrel.png

False copyright attirbution. Clearly not the author's own work, unless Maurice Binder's spirit has internet access. Betty Logan (talk) 06:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 Lohas Park mall shop Foodville Store February 2022 Px3 04.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 06:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 Lohas Park mall shop Foodville Store February 2022 Px3 11.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 06:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 日出康城 Lohas Park mall shop Foodville Store February 2022 Px3 14.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 06:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK 將軍澳 TKO Montara 日出康城商場 LOHAS Park Shopping mall shop BestMart360 Store February 2022 Px3 03.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 06:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the supermarket packaging are COM:DW メイド理世 (talk) 04:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SKD TKO Po Yap Road 將軍澳廣場 Tseung Kwan O Plaza K-mart fresh food indoor market shop 佳寶食品 Kai Bo Food Supermarket January 2022 Px3 06.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE メイド理世 (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Packages are COM:DM, as the focus of the image is a stocked supermarket shelf, not any of the individual package designs. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not de minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 03:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SGTB Khalsa College front building.jpg

No evidence of the file being the uploader's own work or it being copyright free. Appears to be taken from https://sgtbkhalsadu.ac.in/about.php. WikiEditor50 (talk) 06:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashford 2023 Campus 001-1024x495.jpg

No evidence of the file being the uploader's own work or it being copyright free. Appears to be taken from ashfordcollege.ac.uk, see https://www.ashfordcollege.ac.uk/college-life/ WikiEditor50 (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Национальный флаг сибирских татар.jpg

A fictitious flag of a non-existent people. Mizgel (talk) 07:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:241024 twice nayeon k.jpg

This file was initially tagged by FlyingAce as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from https://www.sportsq.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=472180 Ankry (talk) 07:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per UDR complaint.

However, the source video is watermarked with a TV station logo and it is not clear if the Flickr accout owner is related to the TV station and so authorized to license the video. Ankry (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/9/9c/20241030085021%21241024_twice_nayeon_k.jpg Yolo9090 (talk) 08:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/9/9c/20241030085627%21241024_twice_nayeon_k.jpg Yolo9090 (talk) 08:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alabasterboss (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: various AI-generated or misattributed images unused outside a hoax sandbox article

Omphalographer (talk) 07:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Third-party photos hosted by the NWS uploaded by JForget

These images were both sourced from webpages of the US National Weather Service but are the work of third-party photographers. However, we have no evidence that either of these images are in the public domain or available under a free license.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For anyone interested in seeking the permission of the creators to retain these files, I offer, as a head start, the following notes left over from when I investigated them:

File:Tornado Chicot County, Arkansas.JPG: Emailed creator September 23; no response. VRT ticket:2024103010003153

Both these images were taken in the US after 1989, and therefore automatically protected by copyright at the instant of their creation unless ineligible for some reason. Unless anybody can provide any evidence of ineligibility for copyright, or permission from the respective copyright owners, we must delete both the files listed in this request per COM:PRP because as far as we can tell, they both are protected by copyright. --Rlandmann (talk) 07:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intersection of AI and Government Cybersecurity Policies..webp

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of icons of padlocks, shields, etc overlaid on a government building; not a useful illustration. Omphalographer (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Third-party photos hosted by the NWS uploaded by HurricaneKappa

These images were both sourced from webpages of the US National Weather Service but are the work of third-party photographers. However, we have no evidence that either of these images are in the public domain or available under a free license.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For anyone interested in seeking the permission of the creators to retain these files, I offer, as a head start, the following notes left over from when I investigated them:

File:Happy, Texas Tornado Damage.jpg: Emailed creator; Stopped responding October 2. VRT ticket:2024103010003421

Both these images were taken in the US after 1989, and therefore automatically protected by copyright at the instant of their creation unless ineligible for some reason. Unless anybody can provide any evidence of ineligibility for copyright, or permission from the respective copyright owners, we must delete both the files listed in this request per COM:PRP because as far as we can tell, they both are protected by copyright. --Rlandmann (talk) 08:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cold air funnel cloud 2008-08-19 Amarillo.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it are attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source on September 30, but they stopped responding on October 2 without confirming the copyright or licensing status of the file.

I forwarded our correspondence to the VRT: (ticket:2024103010003421)

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator not ineligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 08:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shashwat dahal original.jpg

Author doesn't want to keep it as creative common Thuglifescientist (talk) 08:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed this was your own work. Never upload photos you didn't take as "Own work." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete out of courtesy per deleted en:Draft:Shashwat Dahal. No other contribs to wm projects. --Achim55 (talk) 14:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Third-party photos hosted by the NWS uploaded by Hoguert

These images were both sourced from webpages of the US National Weather Service but are the work of third-party photographers. However, we have no evidence that either of these images are in the public domain or available under a free license.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For anyone interested in seeking the permission of the creators to retain these files, I offer, as a head start, the following notes left over from when I investigated them:

File:Kaschuba-chickasha-02.jpg: Emailed creator; Confirms that they own the copyright. Stopped responding October 1. VRT ticket:2024103010003681

Both these images were taken in the US after 1989, and therefore automatically protected by copyright at the instant of their creation unless ineligible for some reason. Unless anybody can provide any evidence of ineligibility for copyright, or permission from the respective copyright owners, we must delete both the files listed in this request per COM:PRP because as far as we can tell, they both are protected by copyright. --Rlandmann (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Armoiries - nouveau blason.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The question for any image like this is whether the coat of arms is in the public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robby Robinson Wiki.jpg

This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkey fall icon.png

This file was initially tagged by Green Mostaza as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of Tskhinval.png

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 08:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cebrianorama (talk · contribs)

Possibly out of scope - big collection of cartoons from private website (see the uploader's username for the corresponding site name) - I'm not sure what, if any, educational value these have

INeverCry 03:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pretty much obvious copyvio. Licence says: CC BY NC ND. Not free licence. Not evidence of OTRS. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)--Ganímedes (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ganímedes. Kaldari (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 22:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cebrianorama (talk · contribs)

Copyright violations - the provided source is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND. Additionally, these are out of the project scope as personal comics.

Nutshinou ^Talk! 08:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Third-party photos hosted by the NWS uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)

These images were both sourced from webpages of the US National Weather Service but are the work of third-party photographers. However, we have no evidence that either of these images are in the public domain or available under a free license.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For anyone interested in seeking the permission of the creators to retain these files, I offer, as a head start, the following notes left over from when I investigated them:

File:Parkersburg tornado.jpg: Photographer is an NWS employee; confirms that the photo was taken on his own time and that he is the copyright owner. Stopped responding September 21. VRT ticket:2024103010003681
File:Roanoke-tornado-july-04-parsons-after.jpg: Creator uncertain: NWS publicly credits Woodford County EM; Woodford County EM says that NWS told them that copyright belongs to Indiana State Police (VRT ticket:2024092110006474) ; FOIA request with Indiana State Police has not been able to find this image in ISP records as of October 18 (VRT ticket:2024101010006787)

Both these images were taken in the US after 1989, and therefore automatically protected by copyright at the instant of their creation unless ineligible for some reason. Unless anybody can provide any evidence of ineligibility for copyright, or permission from the respective copyright owners, we must delete both the files listed in this request per COM:PRP because as far as we can tell, they both are protected by copyright. --Rlandmann (talk) 08:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Standing Buddha, Mathura, India, 1-99 AD, sikri sandstone - Fitchburg Art Museum - DSC08847.JPG

As per [1] and [2]. Yann (talk) 09:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as no longer copyrighted. The photography restriction is a COM:NCR. @Yann: Your first link is for rollback. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Jeff. Yann (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bidentrump2000mockelection.svg

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 09:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pavolkrisko71 (talk · contribs)

Uploader is apparently the subject, but copyright belongs to the photographer (Ivan Kováč). VRT permission from photographer needed.

MKFI (talk) 09:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RehanBouwer (talk · contribs)

Uploader is apparently the subject, but copyright belongs to the photographer.

MKFI (talk) 09:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artist Quarter 103.jpg

File contains nothing but raw text Nv8200p (talk) 10:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NAIM BOUSLIMANI.jpeg

Private informations, promotion on fr:wp. Wyslijp16 (talk) 10:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conjunto de animados cubanos.jpg

Copyright violation. No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Nv8200p (talk) 10:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Morality, Unity, Honour.jpg

copygihted logo 95.87.235.200 10:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3plecon logo sml rgb.svg

Werbegespamme einer Neugründung He3nry (talk) 11:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Zappa Innovation Manager.png

Self-promotion Yiyi (Dimmi!) 11:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cooking chef.png

Unclear picture without educational value. The Banner (talk) 11:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fortymile River from Taylor Highway.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An article linked from Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-NWS review/File review statuses identifies Larry and June Taylor as "official observers" of the National Weather Service. Here are more details on what being an "official observer" means. However, I'm not sure if that affects the copyright status. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because observers are volunteers, not federal government employees, we'd need to see:

evidence of a contract that transfers volunteers' copyrights into the public domain (not simply transfers their copyrights to the NWS)
evidence that this photo was taken under the terms of that contract

(or, of course, evidence of a release of copyright or a free license via any other mechanism, as for any other image) Without that, the copyright presumably belongs to either June or Larry Taylor. --Rlandmann (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wwparka.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:16 June 1992 Chandler tornado.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tornado southofKennett.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stoneville nws blacksburg.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oscela-Polk-tornado-06202011.JPG

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Witoka hwy17a.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the image 2007 or so from the EN:WP to Commons. Obviously wrong attribution there and then already. Delete. Matthiasb (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EBacc.png

Unlikely to be the uploader's work. Appears to be taken from https://www.latimer.org.uk/_site/data/files/91D751BE32D7C8976B0D56291F89BFA3.pdf. WikiEditor50 (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girardcr36.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EF3 tornado near Nickerson, Kansas.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder.

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PSAP Diagram.jpg

File:PSAP Diagram.jpg is a product image that is found elsewhere on the internet (and it seems to have been photographed rather than copied). I doubt File:PSAP SuperEar® 5000 .jpg is de minimis. Sinigh (talk) 13:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I obviously meant to include File:PSAP SuperEar® 5000 .jpg in the DR too.

It has now been tagged and the uploader (same as above) has been notified. Sinigh (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucie Caffaret - P. Apers, Paris - btv1b84161380.jpg

English: 1

According to the archives of the Journal officiel de la République française, Pierre Apers was repeatedly included in lists of recognized professional experts. Specifically, his name appears in the edition dated 10 April 1957, listed as "Apers (Pierre) (photography), 116, rue de Rennes, Paris (6°)." (see sources included for date of death on wikidata) This record substantiates that he was alive as of April 1957. Although the precise date of his death is unknown, it is reasonable to conclude, based on the information available, that less than 70 years have elapsed since his passing. Accordingly, the works of Pierre Apers cannot be considered part of the public domain.

Français : 2

Selon les archives du Journal officiel de la République française, M. Pierre Apers a été désigné à plusieurs reprises dans une liste d'experts professionnels. Son nom apparaît notamment dans l'édition datée du 10 avril 1957, sous la mention "Apers (Pierre) (photographie), 116, rue de Rennes, Paris (6°)" (cf. sources incluses pour la date de décès sur wikidata) . Ces éléments permettent d’établir qu’il était encore en vie en avril 1957. Bien que la date exacte de son décès demeure inconnue, il est raisonnable de conclure, en vertu des informations disponibles, que moins de 70 ans se sont écoulés depuis son décès. Par conséquent, les œuvres de M. Pierre Apers ne peuvent être considérées comme entrant dans le domaine public. Trauenbaum (talk) 13:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also / Voir également :

File talk:St. Andrews Church Goa Velha.jpg

I am the copyright owner of this ANSON084 (talk) 13:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TV Shows We Used To Watch - The Worker - Charlie Drake 1965-70.jpg

Still from a 1960s British television show. No reason to think that the person who uploaded it to Flickr in 2010 is the copyright holder. Belbury (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/brizzlebornandbred

brizzlebornandbred seems to have been a Flickr user (account now deleted) who uploaded nostalgic British cultural images that he found interesting, writing a little about them in the file description. (Commons:Deletion requests/File:TV Shows We Used To Watch - The Worker - Charlie Drake 1965-70.jpg from this Flickr user is just a still from a 1960s TV show, licenced on Commons as CC-BY to their own name.)

It's possible that the user's street photos taken in the 1960s were his own work, but these ones look like press and publicity shots. There's also a 1928 aerial photograph.

Belbury (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cctecnj.jpg

Taken from https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=456647479818680. No evidence of the file being the uploader's work. WikiEditor50 (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hana Sofia Lopes.jpg

Wahrscheinlich Urheberrechtsverletzugng, Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Hochlader ist aber nicht mit Urheber identisch Lutheraner (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hana Sofia Lopes (cropped).jpg

Wahrscheinlich Urheberrechtsverletzugng, Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Hochlader ist aber nicht mit Urheber identisch Lutheraner (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shacha sauce.jpg

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pilifo (talk · contribs)

Is this permanent display as required by Commons:Freedom of panorama in Slovakia?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as copyvios per COM:FOP Slovakia. The festival is temporary, running 14 June – 22 June per en:IFF Art Film. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After all, they are photos created by me that are in the public domain. Thanks. Pilifo (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Chechen 1.jpg

Not educationally useful 2A01:B747:94C:344:99C9:FF80:82CF:5B65 14:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erotic male nude photography.jpg

COM:NUDE private porn, no educational value LevandeMänniska (talk), 14:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hajj front of Haramian.jpg

COPYVIO AjayDas (talk) 14:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from where? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:আকাশবাণী তেজপুৰ নগৰ.jpg

COPYVIO AjayDas (talk) 14:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag day

Probably some content here worth merging into Flag day in the English-language Wikipedia, but this is basically an overlapping encyclopedia article, not at all a Commons gallery. Jmabel ! talk 14:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The content has been changed to a gallery. Evrik (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- That's fine, it's now an essentially different page. @Evrik: was there nothing worth merging to en-wiki? - Jmabel ! talk 18:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria khan.jpg

COPYVIO AjayDas (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FRIDAY NIGHT FUNKIN' -Playable Pico Preview- Sep.12th.webm

Derivative work of Pico, mascot character of the Newgrounds website (https://newgrounds.fandom.com/wiki/Pico) Trade (talk) 15:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Юрий Вафин.jpg

A piece of absurd. A fake or forged image of a person who preserves his/her privacy and doesn't have any public image. A placeholder for an article, bad idea really. Bilderling (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secretary Blinken Delivers Remarks at Art in Embassies Reception (54103160499).jpg

COM:DW artwork, note that the image is intentionally blurred, thus to focus on the artwork, so de minimis cannot be applied A1Cafel (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:City wall of Sheng County 02 2017-03.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep@A1Cafel 本标志牌的内容是公布文物保护单位的保护范围和建设控制地带，根据《中华人民共和国文物保护法》，“各级文物保护单位，分别由省、自治区、直辖市人民政府和市、县级人民政府划定必要的保护范围，作出标志说明。根据保护文物的实际需要，经省、自治区、直辖市人民政府批准，可以在文物保护单位的周围划出一定的建设控制地带，并予以公布。”

且在图片左下角明确该图片及文字说明均源自于浙江省人民政府（浙政函[2007]22号文件）。

再根据《中华人民共和国著作权法》第五条，“该法不适用于法律、法规，国家机关的决议、决定、命令和其他具有立法、行政、司法性质的文件，及其官方正式译文。”

该图片中内容由政府机构根据法定管理职责发布，并属于政府为管理文物保护单位所形成的行政性质的文件，并不具备版权。猫猫的日记本 (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Olga Semenova

Not available on Flickr now. Internet Archive shows that these photos were uploaded on Flickr by w:Yevgeny Dodolev, who's not a photographer, so no evidence he's the proper copyright holder.

Komarof (talk) 16:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3 Roman Britain 43-410.png

Per Category:Fictional flags of historical entities (to be replaced and deleted), fictitious flag, not currently in use HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magnetic image of council circle.jpg

As briefly discussed here, this survey image may be copyrightable in the United States. In that case, it would probably have to be deleted, since the source page restricts use to nonprofit educational purposes, which is insuficient for Commons. Felix QW (talk) 16:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I consider the image is equivalent to an aerial image, so it should have a copyright. The given NC license is not suitable for Commons. Glrx (talk) 16:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kurdish state under British Mandate.png

Per Category:Fictional flags of historical entities (to be replaced and deleted), fictitious flag, not currently in use HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:American-Lithuanian flag.png

Fictitious flag; unlikely to have educational value per COM:EV and is thus out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandera coronel rosales.png

Unused unofficial flag. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BanderaCnelRosales.png

Unused unofficial flag. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Greek SSR.png

Unused fictitious flag. Out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No such nation ever existed. Omphalographer (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Mongolian SSR.png

Unused fictitious flag. Out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just as with the "Greek SSR", no such nation ever existed. Mongolia was never annexed by the USSR. Omphalographer (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilles Fumey au festival international de géographie 2024.jpg

Hello, I would like to delete this photo which was not successful, the photographer had less than a minute to take it. Is it possible to replace it with another one in the gallery? Thank you so much. 85.170.245.209 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. But please upload a better photo you have the copyright for, because if you do, it's likely to be used instead of this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Serboalbania.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems". After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to do engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Serboalbania.png

Unused fictional flag file. Out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the King of Bohemia (own design - 2).png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the King of Bohemia (own design).png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flagofgermanempire(1871-1918).PNG

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flagofgermanempire(1871-1918).PNG

I share User:Mate2Code's opinion about this. Also, to add my opinion, fictional flags should not be retroactively added to sourced, historical countries. For this specific file, maybe a compromise could be made, as in combining two or more sourced historical flags, and calling that fictional. Centralismo (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ə XPLICIT 01:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flagofgermanempire(1871-1918).PNG

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LGBT Pride Flag of the Qing dynasty.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nazi swastika on a background of the US and UK flags.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pride flag of Manchukuo.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even the creator describes this as "highly fictitious". Omphalographer (talk) 00:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prime Minister Standard of Serbia (fictional).png

An invented flag, which is not in use. There are no relevant sources. --Smiroje (talk) 18:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: older upload, no reason. --Krd 04:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prime Minister Standard of Serbia (fictional).png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rainbow flag of the Chinese Soviet Republic.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ahistorical in the extreme; the source flag was only used between 1934 and 1937. Omphalographer (talk) 20:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Flag of the Hellenic League (circa. 1943).png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Constantine ✍ 20:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Union of Australian Federal Republics-1.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Umayyad Caliphate Flag.png

per COM:EDUSE and COM:WEBHOST: self-made fan-flag with elements that are anachronistic (crescent-and-star) and incorrect (green color, the Umayyads used white). One of a series of such fictional flags, but labelled as if they were legitimate, by the same author. Constantine ✍ 20:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Umayyad Caliphate Flag.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per this and my previous nomination. Constantine ✍ 20:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tak personal flag.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NUCB Business School.jpg

own work? https://mba.nucba.ac.jp/access/nagoya.html eien20 (talk) 16:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Umayyad Banner.png

out of scope INeverCry 22:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uncontested DR. MBisanz ^talk 21:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Umayyad Banner.png

per COM:EDUSE and COM:WEBHOST, a completely fictional and made-up flag. An 'Umayyad-ized' version of File:Abbasid Caliphate Caliphal Banner.svg, with the Kufic inscription from the modern Iraqi flag. Constantine ✍ 18:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. COM:INUSE. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- IronGargoyle it is no longer in use. Constantine ✍ 10:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.47.151.213 (talk) 06:59, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Umayyad Banner.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Constantine ✍ 20:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Collaborationist England.webp

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolfennstein Flag.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiction flag of Bouvet Island.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of NO 2100 Longyearbyen.png

Unused fictitious flag; out of project scope. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 16:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folheto do curso virtual Wikipédia em chave de gêneros.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner do curso virtual Wikipédia em chave de gêneros.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner do curso virtual Wikipédia para professores universitários.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curadores do evento Mais Povos Originários em Teoria da História na Wiki.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webinar Mais Povos Originários.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webinar Povos Originários.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webinar Mais Pretas.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facilitadores da editatona Mais Pretas em Teoria da História na Wiki.png

This file was initially tagged by DarwIn as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 17:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável.png

Doesn't meet {{PD-UN-doc}} as it is not a "text document". Belbury (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embassy of Vietnam in India 9.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake कृष्ण कान्त शर्मा (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload but file is still COM:INUSE at d:Q112671313. --Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BurnsidePark-1-2.jpg

No FoP for 2D graphical works in Canada. Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stern Benjamin.jpg

Potential copyright vio [3] Elfabso (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bakare jamiu oladosu.png

image used only by spam entry which will have been deleted off wikidata by the time an admin deals with this request DS (talk) 18:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alan and Karen photo.webp

Uploaded as own work, but it seems highly unlikely that one of the people in this photo has taken it. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now corrected PD-US-1978-89, no registration in the USCO database under either name or variations of their name. --RAN (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alan, Roger, Karen, Irv in barn.webp

Uploaded as own work, but it seems highly unlikely that one of the people in this photo has taken it. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irv, Alan, Alex and Karen.jpg

Uploaded as own work, but it seems highly unlikely that one of the people in this photo has taken it. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:William Dunst

Self-promotion: William Dunst Official is a dedicated multimedia repository on Wikimedia Commons, curated and managed by Team Dunst. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 19:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nana Patole during detention after protest.jpg

Possible license laundering by the Flickr uploader, no camera EXIF plus no followers. Abzeronow (talk) 19:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vargaći , Vargaci ,Vargaći, Picture.jpg

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 19:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corrientes marinas Océano Paciífico centro oriental.png

This file actually ASKS for its own deletion reading "File candidate to deletion". There is a load of whitespacew in this file which is probably the reason. Thanks in advance! 109.79.30.209 19:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koripallokenttä.webp

Out of scope: unused, inaccurate AI-generated diagram of a basketball court. We have much better human-made diagrams, e.g. File:Basketball court dimensions.svg. Omphalographer (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Overdoofus.webp

Out of scope: unused AI-generated cartoon. No clear educational use. Omphalographer (talk) 20:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fffiorana.webp

Out of scope: AI-generated image of a store, unused outside a (likely hoax) enwiki sandbox. Omphalographer (talk) 20:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Xemsomenh (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: logo and artwork related to uploader's astrology(?) web site. Uploader indef blocked on viwiki for related edits.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warning File Icon.png

New account does not have autopatrol but has updated version of file that should be used, current file is not used in any Wikimedia project. The People's Internet Legacy Assets (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Unidentified locations in Virginia

Unused low quality images of random forests in VA from flickr, unfortunaly there is no context on the more exact location, and plenty of much higher-quality images can be found at Category:Fall foliage in Virginia. Therefore these images are ouf of scope.

(I think these 1 2 3 4 scenes from the series are worth keeping)

~TheImaCow (talk) 21:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babajide.jpg

Archivo de internet 186.174.39.170 21:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GSS2uQiWgAEpJXu.jpg

Quién es Heinrich Hoffman? 186.174.39.170 21:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saints Row 2 on Igromir 2008 (3012105101).jpg

Copyrighted billboard and video game gameplay is clearly the focus of the photo Trade (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylheti world.jpg

Inaccurate map with no sources or references, such figures can never found as no data is recorded of such a group and wrong countries are highlighted giving false information Abu Ayyub (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. Discuss this on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Munfordville, Kentucky Tornado, November 6, 2005.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source. They confirmed that some photos taken by the Civil Air Patrol belong to agencies that paid for missions, but the CAP retains ownership of others. They stopped responding by September 21 without confirming the status of this particular image.

I forwarded our correspondence to the VRT: (ticket:2024102710005989)

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los peces rojos (1955).jpg

This file will be protected in Spain until at least 2036. The poster is signed CARVILLE and Barno, which may identify the artist. In addition, the URAA will make this poster protected in the US until 2050. there is no indication that the Flickr uploader is the rights holder, so the rules for {{PDMark-Owner}} do not allow for that template to be applied. Felix QW (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The actual artist's signature is on the lower left, JANO. That is Francisco Fernández-Zarza Pérez, who died in 1992. Undelete in 2063. --Rosenzweig τ 12:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent identification work, thank you very much! Felix QW (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adolf-hitler-at-the-reich-chancellery-20-march-1945-v0-3b2hsqxdkjod1.webp

Es Reddit el autor con derechos? 186.174.39.170 21:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin. Saffet Arıkan Adolf Hitler'in evinde Berlin. Saffet Arıkan in Adolf Hitler's house.jpg

Pertenece al gobierno de Polonia esta foto? 186.174.39.170 21:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emdad Tafsir Profile Picture.jpg

Foto de Emdad Tasfir 186.174.39.170 22:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting not to delete, It's my own work. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 02:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FridleyDamage.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party, although it is unclear whether the supplier of the image was actually the photographer and presumably copyright owner.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to a person who I believe supplied the photo named in the attribution at the source on September 22, but they never replied. The actual creator holder therefore remains unknown.

I forwarded our correspondence to the VRT: (ticket:2024103010012741)

Since this is an image created in the US before 1989, its copyright status will depend on the circumstances of its first publication, in particular, whether it was published before or after March 1, 1989. The earliest known publication of this image is on the NWS website where it was sourced. Unless any evidence of a previous publication can be found, this image is protected for 70 years after the death of its creator, or 120 years (expiring in 2086) if its creator is never identified.

Without evidence to the contrary, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 22:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esmeralda la zíngara.jpg

The Spanish Wikipedia entry for the film suggests that the Spanish debut was in 1944, making this poster copyrighted in Spain until the end of this year, and in the US until 2040. It is very unlikely that the Flickr uploader is the copyright holder, so the requirements for {{PDMark-Owner}} are not met. Felix QW (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waverly, NE EF3 Tornado on April 26, 2024.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source on September 5, but they never replied. (VRT ticket:2024103010012876)

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washington tornado at EF4 intensity passing by home taken by Anthony Khoury.jpg

This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.

For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:

public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice

An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.

Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source on October 2, but they never replied. (VRT ticket:2024103010012947)

Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: What platform did you try to contact the photographer on? He seems to have a presence on multiple websites. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook. --Rlandmann (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hans Christen (Bruder Klaus Kirche, Basel)

copyvio; artist d. 1994; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Roy Hill (1970).jpg

This is not George Roy Hill. There's an actual photo of him on the set of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid here, which makes it pretty obvious this is just some random guy (as if the fact that this guy is bald and has a mustache wasn't enough). This is cropped from another photo, File:George Roy Hill and William R Edmondson.jpg, whose discussion page has two comments that also point out this is not Hill. Nohomersryan (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. Discuss this on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorenzetti - Madonna col Bambino in trono e angeli, c. 1340, 1890 n. 445.jpg

copy vio, this file is not covered by the PD-art tag as it is not PD-art but 3D see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lorenzetti - firma - Madonna con Bambino in trono e angeli, 00284550.jpg Oursana (talk) 22:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azeroth in World of Warcraft 2021.jpg

I was planning to use this map in the Azeroth article on ENWIKI, but while it shares a vague resemblance to the map of Azeroth, the scaling of places is way off to the point it's hilariously inaccurate. Compared to the more official, copyrighted map ([4]) Broken Isles and Zandalar are insanely massive, almost continent-sized in themselves. The attempt at making a map is appreciated, but we should also not be misinforming readers with maps that are simply false, it may be better to just make readers look one up. Zxcvbnm (talk) 23:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Hiya! When I made this quick map, it was in order to comply with the Commons:Fan art guidelines. I wanted to keep it vague enough not to infringe on any sort of copyright. If you're an active contributor to enwiki, you may be able to use a map from the games themselves using free use on that project (something most projects, including Commons, are unable to do). I am not opposing deletion or anything, I just wanted to give context! This image is also in use on nowiki (where I am primarily active) to give a rough idea of the world. I agree the map could be better, but in my mind, it was (and is) better than nothing. EdoAug (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my argument is not with the map's stylization, but with the proportional sizing of everything being out-of-whack to the point of misinforming viewers. So I do think it's potentially fixable. A fanmade version would still be preferable to an official one. Zxcvbnm (talk) 02:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azeroth.jpg

Another very incorrect, unencyclopedic Azeroth map that should probably not be used in any articles. Compared to the [5] official map, it seems to omit Pandaria, which is odd given that Mists of Pandaria released in 2012. It mislabels Kezan, gives the wrong name "Easter Kingdoms", and also lacks the Broken Isles. There are too many errors for the map to represent an accurate visual of Azeroth as opposed to someone's vague recollection. Zxcvbnm (talk) 23:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – It's worth noting that the map of Warcraft's world, Azeroth, has not always appeared the same. It seems the map is taking inspiration from older fan-made composite maps based on then-available sources.

The island named Telabim is misspelled, but not necessarily mislabeled. Tel'Abim was an island present in some lore, as well as seemingly directly depicted (like in this file) in the World of Warcraft RPG from 2006. In World of Warcraft (and the new Chronicle books, which you linked to as an official map), those islands have been shifted around in later expansions. It's not until Cataclysm (2010) that Kezan gets added to and labeled in the in-game map – Pandaria as a whole was not added until Mists of Pandaria (2012). The Broken Isles were also not added until Legion (2016), though may have been visible in some older roleplaying books.

I'm not opposing deletion, I just found it important to share context to the map. The map of Azeroth is evolving with the expansion of the Warcraft franchise. It does seem like this particular map is drawing heavy influence from another fan-made map, however. EdoAug (talk) 01:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is understandable, but neither the description nor the map makes it clear what out-of-universe time period in the lore, or what map, it's actually based on. With regards to current lore, it's very out-of-date, and therefore not of much use as an accurate map of current Azeroth in articles that will likely mention places such as Pandaria, etc. It was uploaded in 2020 so there is not really a reason for it to be so dated either. Zxcvbnm (talk) 01:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE. Discuss inaccuracies elsewhere, such as on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot Of Homepage Wikitubia.jpg

Fandom disclaimer only covers text, images are not automatically CC-BY-SA Trade (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

Unclear source of the photos. See monitor moire pattern on all photos (probably photos of the photos on the screen). According to Exif it's impossible to be in one day in villages all over Slovakia.

— Draceane ^talk_contrib. 18:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the nominator. The screen door effect on all the images is extremely suspicious. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

These are just photographes of the screen, the original copyrihgt holder is Czech television (Česká televize).

Gumruch (talk) 16:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

Dervivate work of non-free video, copyright holder is TV Lux.

Gumruch (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Doko (talk · contribs)

Imagevios. Copyright Czech television. Just re-photographed from the screen.

Gumruch (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sadoveanu - Nobela Peko, 1929, Morariu.pdf

This is based on the complaint on the talk page. I can't load the source, so I can't verify whether John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin would actually have the rights to release the works of Sadoveanu and Morariu. The translator Morariu died in 1987, so copyright would naturally last until 2057 in the EU, where it was originally published (Leipzig, Germany). However, it was published in 1929, and is out of copyright in the US in two months. At that point, it could be uploaded to the Esperanto Wikisource, their rules willing, or the multilingual Wikisource, which does accept works that are PD-US-only if the normal Wikisource excludes them by their copyright rules. Prosfilaes (talk) 00:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ĉi tio baziĝas sur la plendo sur la diskutpaĝo. Mi ne povas ŝargi la fonton, do mi ne povas kontroli ĉu Johano Paŭlo la 2-a Katolika Universitato de Lublin efektive havus la rajtojn liberigi la verkojn de Sadoveanu kaj Morariu. La tradukinto Morariu mortis en 1987, do kopirajto nature daŭros ĝis 2057 en EU, kie ĝi estis origine eldonita (Leipzig, Germanio). Tamen, ĝi estis publikigita en 1929, kaj estas sen kopirajto en Usono en du monatoj. Tiutempe, ĝi povus esti alŝutita al la Esperanta Vikifontaro, laŭ iliaj reguloj, aŭ al la plurlingva Vikifontaro, kiu ja akceptas verkojn kiuj estas nur PD-Usonaj se la normala Vikifontaro ekskludas ilin per siaj kopirajtaj reguloj. --Prosfilaes (talk) 00:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. On the page where I found this book, it is indicated that the rights are hold by the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, and that it is public domain. So I don’t understand… Lepticed7 (talk) 07:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For whatever reason, the page wouldn't load for me. I am a little skeptical that it's not just carelessness, especially as there is Sadoveanu and Morariu's copyrights to worry about. Sadoveanu was a major Romanian author who died in 1961, associated with Communism and the Romanian Orthodox Church. How did rights to his works end up in the hands of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin? Morariu is more likely, but not sufficient, and even there I'd like more information.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaliforniyskaya-poroda.jpg

low resolution, no Exif > very likely to be an imagevio — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 09:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]