User talk:EF5
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]Please do not upload random images from the internet unless they are in the public domain or freely licensed. 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 08:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial-panorama-of-lower-manhattan-skyline-at-sunset-mihai-andritoiu.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
0x0a (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
File:February-26 2024-Storm-Damage Near my Home, London Ohio, Lafayette-Plain City Road.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
0x0a (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello EF5.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
0x0a (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Sean Jones Mugshot For Sports 2024 Marquette.webp
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:London Studer picture for article 2024.jpg
- File:GLHS LOGO 2024 yes.png
- File:Photo I Took Of Main Entrance March 2024.webp
- File:GLHS My Render Fall 2025.jpg
- File:March 31 2023 Adamsville tornado nws.jpg
- File:2014 Pilger Tornadoes NWS Damage Aftermath.jpg
- File:Pilger Twin Tornadoes 2014 NWS.jpg
- File:Feb 27 2024 ohio tornado gahanna.jpg
- File:The London, Ohio EF1 tornado on February 28, 2024.jpg
Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week
[edit]You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: uploading unfree files after warnings.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
--Didym (talk) 21:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
File:March 14 2024 Ohio tornado location unknown.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Penitentes (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:A larger version of a tornado gif that I made.gif
- File:A pixel drawing of a tornado that I created earlier this morning.gif
Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sulphur, OK tornado.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sulphur, OK tornado.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sulphur, OK tornado.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
WeatherWriter (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey MemeGod27, WeatherWriter here. This may seem odd, but this is actually a standard process for images where it seems even slightly unlikely to be true. The same process actually had to occur for the aeriel photograph of the Sulphur, Oklahoma damage (File:Sulphur, OK Tornado Damage 2024.png - look at the "permission section" of the description of the image). Basically, your friend needs to pop a very short and quick few word email over to the Volunteer Response Team that the photograph is indeed authorized to be put into the public domain. The email link for them is in the message above. Basically, most times when an editor uploads a really unique photograph (large shots (like drone/helicopter photographs) or historic/style photographs (tornadoes or events), and they are uploaded without a URL-based link, the images almost always run through this "deletion"-style process. It does not mean anything is wrong with the image, but for legal purposes, the Commons administrators have to keep records of who gave what photographs into the public domain/free-to-use licenses. Like I said, this is not meant to be like a true "deletion" request for the image, but rather the start to that short email process. If you have any questions about it, feel free to message me! WeatherWriter (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll shoot him an email to confirm that it is him that took the photo. Thanks! :D MemeGod27 (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- (And to email the team) MemeGod27 (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll shoot him an email to confirm that it is him that took the photo. Thanks! :D MemeGod27 (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dead Man Walking Jarrell 1997.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chlod (say hi!) 12:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Just so you know, I recategorized this file into some more relevant categories. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 14:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Greenfield or Corning Iowa Violent Tornado 5.21.24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 20:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me. Good god. MemeGod27 (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2023 rolling fork tornado picks up car.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WeatherWriter (talk) 22:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey WxTrinity! This image is actually a rare-instance of an exempt image (I believe at least) from the PD-NWS template. Sorry for the deletion discussion on it, but I think this one doesn't fall under the PD-NWS template criteria. WeatherWriter (talk) 22:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, well I guess I learned something new today! WxTrinity (talk to me!) 20:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
1997 Jerrell tornado.
[edit]Just to warn in advance. There is a deletion request affecting all Non-NWS images on NWS servers. And that argument is currently veering towards deletion. If the consensus is to delete. I (or someone else) will have to re-nominate the 1997 Jerrell Dead Man Walking tornado picture for deletion. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Jarrell tornado image was confirmed to have been PD, it should be unaffected by this already over-the-top deletion thing. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 23:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- It affects ALL pictures using the PD-NWS template that weren’t directly produced by the NWS itself. I received a copyvio warning myself just now because of it. And apparently everyone on the project did. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 23:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jesus. And I indirectly started this madness. This'll significantly lower the quality of many tornado articles aswell. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 23:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m going to be blunt here; that image will probably be nominated for deletion (or even tagged for speedy deletion), because the discussion ruled that not every image submitted to the NWS is PD; as such, there is about a 99.9% chance that the Jerrell tornado image gets deleted. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news there; but that’s the direction it’s going. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 19:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- To further ruin your day (as much as I don’t want to); the National Weather Service itself just sent one of the other editors an email clarifying that the upload process (onto their servers) does NOT automatically release the image into the public domain. Which means that copyrighted/nonfree images are hosted on there. So I am alerting everyone: DO NOT upload anything under A PD-NWS TAG that isn’t directly produced by the weather service. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 04:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 19:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m going to be blunt here; that image will probably be nominated for deletion (or even tagged for speedy deletion), because the discussion ruled that not every image submitted to the NWS is PD; as such, there is about a 99.9% chance that the Jerrell tornado image gets deleted. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news there; but that’s the direction it’s going. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jesus. And I indirectly started this madness. This'll significantly lower the quality of many tornado articles aswell. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 23:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- It affects ALL pictures using the PD-NWS template that weren’t directly produced by the NWS itself. I received a copyvio warning myself just now because of it. And apparently everyone on the project did. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 23:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Dead Man Walking Jarrell 1997.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WestVirginiaWX (talk) 16:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- As much as it pains me to have to do this. I did have to renominate that picture for deletion; because the PD rationale is no longer valid. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- I got it the first 2 times. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 17:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well I’m sorry about the second message; it automatically generated when I nominated the picture. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 17:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies if the bolded message above sent by me came off as rude, I guess I just wasn't having a good day on the 10th. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 20:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well I’m sorry about the second message; it automatically generated when I nominated the picture. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 17:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I got it the first 2 times. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 17:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
File:2024 Pedro Fire near Coulterville.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Penitentes (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
File:1997 Jarrell tornado peak strength.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WestVirginiaWX (talk) 17:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize; you may get additional messages like this because they automatically generate when the file is nominated. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service
[edit]I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.
The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.
Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).
Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll get to it! Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 21:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Jarrell tornado path.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Jarrell tornado funnel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Jarrell tornado up close 1997.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Jarrell tornado initial stages.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 07:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi Sir MemeGod -- I've been trying to verify where this image came from, but I can't find it at the URL you cited, either in its current, live version or in archives. Could you help guide me to the image source please? --Rlandmann (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Rlandmann: I believe it was removed from the source, because that's where it was. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 23:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks; I won't look further afield. --01:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Rlandmann (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Jarrell F5 pavement scouring.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 10:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
File:1997 Jarrell tornado roping.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Listen. I’m going to be blunt on this one image here. It may very well meet speedy deletion criteria for a copyright violation. I have pinged three administrators on this one to get their take. But the owner of the picture when contacted by Rlandmann refused to license it and then sent another email to cuss Rlandmann out essentially. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have placed a speedy delete tag on this one. Please read the rationale before deciding to remove it. Because the copyright holder essentially cussed us out when refusing to release their rights. So that tells me that this is a clear copyright violation and that they are not happy and potentially ready to sue. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- They reverted the speedy delete tag. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 19:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I take that back. At least one admin is still supporting speedy deletion. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 21:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- They reverted the speedy delete tag. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 19:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have placed a speedy delete tag on this one. Please read the rationale before deciding to remove it. Because the copyright holder essentially cussed us out when refusing to release their rights. So that tells me that this is a clear copyright violation and that they are not happy and potentially ready to sue. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 16:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
File:1997 Jarrell forming.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- It has been tagged for speedy deletion. Sorry; but it was taken by the same person who cussed Rlandmann out. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 02:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
File:C-City First Christian Church on Wisconsin Street Damage.gif and File:Charles City tornado track.gif
[edit]File:C-City First Christian Church on Wisconsin Street Damage.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 08:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Tornado damage Charles city 8th and Hildreth.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Rlandmann.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ixfd64 (talk) 20:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Grimaces Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 20:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Moody County tornado 1997.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 12:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Well-lit cone tornado.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 07:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 08:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 09:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
File:2023 Lewiston shooting Montage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fastily 00:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rlandmann (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |