Commons:Administrators/Requests/Gameposo

 Support = 1;  Oppose = 15;  Neutral = 1 - 6% Result. Unsuccessful. --Krd 07:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Gameposo

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/Gameposo

Vote

Gameposo (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 05:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm a long-term editor and contributor to Wikipedia. I would like to use several additional features in Commons to expand my activities as an automatically authenticated user of Wikipedia and an administrator of Korean Wikipedia. Gameposo (talk) 05:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Votes

 Oppose, no user rights log entries for this user found on kowiki. The user continues to upload copyright violations, and canvassed in these edits.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:24, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Probably not qualified to be a kowiki admin anyway: account created < 6 months ago and has only 190 edits. Commons account is only slightly older. Brianjd (talk) 12:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose per Jeff G.. Also, as recently as last month, the nominee posted comments on a DR, marking their edits as "minor", and also responded to the DR on their own talk page, again marking their edits as "minor". The response on their talk page should have been on the DR; another user posted a comment on the DR referencing the talk page. I could go on, but I think their talk page speaks for itself; also, looking through their contributions, I found another one to nominate for deletion as copyvio (includes copyright notice from 1991, claimed "own work" CC BY-SA 4.0). Brianjd (talk) 11:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Start with simpler rights. Also there are a lot of things to do, where you don't need any special right. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose per Jeff and Brian. User's only been here since May 2021 so that alone is enough to oppose, Honestly not sure if this a serious nom or whether we're all being trolled!. –Davey2010^Talk 12:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support moral support. Otherwise I'm against as per above comments. Bedivere (talk) 15:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jeff G. --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacking necessary experience. --A.Savin 16:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now, no intent posted about what they would do with the additional tools or how it will benefit the Wikimedia Commons. Anyhow, I hope that not passing through this RfA won't discourage you from contributing and that you will seek to help tackle current backlogs and will try again in the future after you've gained more experience and the trust of your fellow unpaid colleagues. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 04:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Per above. Would like to see you more involved in tackling the current backlog in other areas before going to RfA. --Hulged (talk) 07:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Still have copyvio uploads recently. User is not ready for advanced user level, not to say request for adminiship. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too early. Not enough experience. Rzuwig^► 12:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry to pile on, but I agree the candidate lacks the level of experience expected, and I am also concerned by these posts [1][2] where this user is going around asking about how to apply for adminship hours after filing this request. I'd expect that to be something they did before applying. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

  @Beeblebrox It's hard to tell what they are saying, because those posts are very broken English. Hence my suggestion below that they add a Babel box. Note that Jeff G. considers at least one of those edits to be inappropriate canvassing (see their vote above). Brianjd (talk) 03:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

  @Brianjd: Both edits, actually.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 12:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Neutral because I don't want to pile on. I'm seeing a lack of experience and lack of understanding of copyright. Maybe next time but not now. Jianhui67 ^T★C 15:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose: per above —MdsShakil (talk) 18:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose: I don't think they really understand what is Wikimedia Commons, much less being able to work as an admin here. Platonides (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose. Gameposo still needs to prove their eligibility for adminship. The doors are always open though, but still too early. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too early Poco a poco (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

In the second example of canvassing offered by Jeff G., this user refers to themselves in the plural. Either they have limited English (in which case they should add a Babel box to their user page, which currently redirects to their user talk page), or we have deeper problems. Brianjd (talk) 12:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

@Brianjd: I agree, but please note that I appreciate being pinged when mentioned (except on my user talk page, where that would be superfluous).   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 15:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

I see that the nominee has made a few edits on other projects, but has not returned to Commons. I invite them to respond here. Brianjd (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)