User talk:XRay/Archive/2016

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Feld an der Friedensallee -- 2015 -- 8727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful implementation. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Amazing color combination and beautiful motive. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche und Rathaus -- 2015 -- 8694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ugly, but good quality. --Rolf H. 05:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glandorf, Ortsansicht -- 2014 -- 8531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8654-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wiese am Strandbadweg -- 2015 -- 8731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8629-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Borgplackenweg -- 2015 -- 8742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8644-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, it's not blurred but it might have been a bit sharper Finally, gooed enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 06:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hasenläufer 12:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Great detail! --Michael Barera 04:20, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wiese am Strandbadweg -- 2015 -- 8733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8624-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Thrilling view. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 03:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wiese am Strandbadweg -- 2015 -- 8738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice Bokeh! --Hasenläufer 03:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wiese am Strandbadweg -- 2015 -- 8736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some background on the light side, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2015 -- 0050-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality and nice --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8704-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A Q1photo, the perspective is good, only right part of the building is a bit blurred --Michielverbeek 06:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Haus an der Marktstraße -- 2015 -- 8698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof not so sharp, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you for your answer. Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Blumen am Straßenrand -- 2015 -- 8899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Marienkapelle -- 2015 -- 8718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8602-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Haus Löhning -- 2012 -- 8751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 09:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2015 -- 0039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olfen, Haus Sandfort -- 2014 -- 8879 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Nonnenturm -- 2015 -- 7933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulpturen im Bendixpark -- 2015 -- 8539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I do not object nice (but that's personal), but the picture is of good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rorup, Grabstein des Ersten Amtmannes -- 2015 -- 7498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

QI cats in my user template

Hi XRay, thank you for the corrections in my user template regarding the QI categorization and sorry for creating extra work that way. Feel free to leave me a note and I'll remove those sections from the template and just do this manually, that might be easier to maintain. Cheers, — Julian H.^✈ 18:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

War zwar etwas umständlicher, aber bei den beiden Änderungen kein Problem. Kein Problem. --XRay ^talk 18:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rorup, St.-Agatha-Kirche -- 2015 -- 7665-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bold perspective for me but good quality.--Famberhorst 07:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen, Schloss Nordkirchen, Schlosspark -- 2015 -- 7833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Appelhülsen, St.-Maria-Himmelfahrt-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velen, Schloss Velen -- 2015 -- 1343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Berenbrock, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (an der Kreisstraße 13) -- 2015 -- 9972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velen, Schloss Velen -- 2015 -- 1341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 05:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice! --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Haus Osthoff -- 2014 -- 4453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velen, Schloss Velen -- 2015 -- 1347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Haus Löhning -- 2015 -- 8708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems to be a little crooked, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lippetal, Lippborg -- 2014 -- 8726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality fo me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8609-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Berenbrock, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (an der Kreisstraße 23) -- 2015 -- 4655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warendorf, Franziskaner-Kloster -- 2014 -- 8606 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Well done, the shadows are a bit too dark maybe --Hubertl 09:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now. --XRay 17:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sassenberg, Füchtorf, Schloss Harkotten -- 2014 -- 8549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Heubach -- 2015 -- 0103-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, Hohe Domkirche St. Peter -- 2015 -- 6146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Justizvollzugsanstalt -- 2014 -- 8284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8857-63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen -- 2015 -- 0013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee -- 2014 -- 8942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, Alte Brennerei Hellmann -- 2015 -- 5804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Kettbach -- 2015 -- 9900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Clemens-Brentano-Gymnasium -- 2014 -- 8093 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:14, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Parkbank am Wildpark -- 2016 -- 0349-55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 07:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee -- 2014 -- 8921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hörstel, Ostenwalde -- 2014 -- 9615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Servatiikirche -- 2014 -- 4004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 13:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, St.-Sixtus-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Wiese -- 2015 -- 0219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greven, St.-Josef-Kirche -- 2014 -- 9861 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Wallgarten -- 2015 -- 0223-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Kettbach -- 2015 -- 0217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice picture. --Code 07:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm, Schloss Heessen -- 2014 -- 8827 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Wallgarten -- 2015 -- 0221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 9923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Carschten 17:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Wallgarten -- 2015 -- 0228-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in Börnste -- 2016 -- 0376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden, St.-Laurentius-Kirche -- 2014 -- 7349 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in Börnste -- 2016 -- 0383-bw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

New FP nomination

Hello, XRay! I decided to nominate this picture for Commons:Featured picture candidates. I really like it; it's like a good painting, and I hate how some people don't like photos if there's "too much going on" in them. Anyway, I hope others like it as much as I do, but I thought I'd let you know in case you'd like to vote on your own photo.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sassenberg, Füchtorf, Schloss Harkotten -- 2014 -- 8548 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Autobahn 43 (Borkener Straße) -- 2016 -- 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 9925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Oedlerteich (Heubachniederung) -- 2015 -- 0189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments weak support, but the mood and the different DOF makes it for me. Third opinions appreciated --Hubertl 11:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm, Lippeauen -- 2014 -- 8816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8609-13.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8609-13.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ladbergen, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal -- 2014 -- 9826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Freilichtmuseum Mühlenhof -- 2014 -- 8248 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Parkbank am Wildpark -- 2016 -- 0356-62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in Börnste -- 2016 -- 0379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Hatten wir dieses Feld nicht schon zu anderen Jahreszeiten? Ein Lieblingsfeld? ) --Cccefalon 05:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC) Ertappt. Nein, aber nah dran: Es ist auf dem Weg zum Bäcker, wenn man einen kleinen Umweg fährt. --XRay 13:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sendenhorst, Fernmeldeturm -- 2014 -- 8660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recke, St.-Dionysius-Kirche -- 2014 -- 9705 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in Börnste -- 2016 -- 0383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in Börnste -- 2016 -- 0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality, nice --Christian Ferrer 17:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me if you improve the bottom left crop Poco a poco 21:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. Crop (and CAs) improved. --XRay 16:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8478-82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 09:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Walzenwehr am Stausee -- 2016 -- 0399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Bahnhof -- 2016 -- 0438-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clovelly (Devon, UK), Katze -- 2013 -- 1337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Kettbach -- 2015 -- 0211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood and just enough in focus --Daniel Case 05:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Parkbank am Wildpark -- 2016 -- 0327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Oedlerteich (Heubachniederung) -- 2015 -- 0184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee -- 2014 -- 9106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Nonnenturm -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bottom of the tower is a bit unsharp but it's still a Q1photo, perspectiove is good --Michielverbeek 21:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Autobahn 43 (Leuster Weg) -- 2016 -- 0278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another one of these done right --Daniel Case 06:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Düsseldorf, Rheinturm -- 2015 -- 8127.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Düsseldorf, Rheinturm -- 2015 -- 8127.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Bildungszentrum der IG Bergbau, Chemie, Energie -- 2016 -- 0473-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technical a beautiful photo --Michielverbeek 23:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in Börnste -- 2016 -- 0376-bw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I believe that DOF could be better chosen, so as the nearer poles were in focus, so a  weak support. --C messier 16:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Brücke am Walzenwehr -- 2016 -- 0500-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments special.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Bootssteg -- 2016 -- 0490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Untilting marks top left and bottom right. Raising chroma denoising alongside with slight raise of brightness might be an enhancement. --Cccefalon 07:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks for your advise. It's no fixed. --XRay 08:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Unfortunately not. The marks just changed their location. Use "Constrain Crop" in LR pse. --Cccefalon 09:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC) Ok now! --Cccefalon 09:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Strohfiguren in Daldrup -- 2015 -- 5954.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Strohfiguren in Daldrup -- 2015 -- 5954.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3533.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3533.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Rathaus -- 2016 -- 0600-6, 0614-20, 0621-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent night photo from a town where I have been before, very sharp, low ISO, long exposure time, high f-value, only the streetlights are reflecting a bit --Michielverbeek 11:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Freibad -- 2016 -- 0635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful mood. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Rathaus -- 2016 -- 0600-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Rathaus -- 2016 -- 0600-6, 0614-20, 0621-7 - bw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Distortion needs to be more carefully fixed: the photo is slightly tilted to the left, and the white lines between the windows at the center are also slightly bent.--Rftblr 21:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)  Fixed It's fixed and IMO OK (now). Thanks for your advice. --XRay 18:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)  Support Looks like good quality to me --Prosthetic Head 14:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality! --Rftblr 18:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kunstwerk am Vermessungsbüro Drerup -- 2016 -- 0726-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kunstwerk am Vermessungsbüro Drerup -- 2016 -- 0703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 16:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Blick auf den Chemiepark Marl -- 2016 -- 0745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! --Ermell 13:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Römermuseum -- 2016 -- 0753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lorenkenturm -- 2003 -- 0119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kunstwerk am Vermessungsbüro Drerup -- 2016 -- 0712-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Blick auf den Chemiepark Marl -- 2016 -- 0738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Römermuseum -- 2016 -- 0756-63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0079.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0079.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Re: Picture of the day on March, 7

No problem at all. Thanks for letting me know. --Arjuno (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 0786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 0792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 0790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice perspective on the fence --Daniel Case 05:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 0793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lüdinghausen, Berenbrock, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (an der Kreisstraße 23) -- 2015 -- 4655.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lüdinghausen, Berenbrock, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal (an der Kreisstraße 23) -- 2015 -- 4655.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2016 -- 0822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM -- 2016 -- 0823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM, Skulptur -Körper und Seele- -- 2016 -- 0820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2016 -- 0808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM -- 2016 -- 0854-60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2016 -- 0865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, DRK, Zentrum für Transfusionsmedizin -- 2016 -- 0809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM -- 2016 -- 0861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Do you know the name of the tree? Sounds like a lime. Good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2016 -- 0863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2016 -- 0866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Münster, Prinzipalmarkt -- 2014 -- 4516-20-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Prinzipalmarkt -- 2014 -- 4516-20-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 0787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 10:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 0803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CA should be fixed. Declining sharpness on the left--Ermell 07:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)  Fixed CAs removed now. Thanks for your advice. --XRay 11:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marl, Blick auf den Chemiepark Marl -- 2016 -- 1061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marl, Zeche Auguste Victoria, Schacht 8 -- 2016 -- 1068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2016 -- 0806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good composition. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Klettergarten -- 2016 -- 1070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

wie gewuenscht

select img_name, img_width, img_height from image where img_user = (select user_id from user where user_name = "XRay" limit 1) and greatest(img_width, img_height)<2000;

name	width	height
file:Ahlen,_Vorhelm,_St.-Pankratius-Kirche_--_2014_--_8667_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1439	1348
file:Apfel_-Dülmener_Rose-_--_2014_--_1.jpg	1962	1398
file:Ascheberg,_Herbern,_St.-Benedikt-Kirche_--_2014_--_3866_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1343	1329
file:Bad_Bentheim,_Evangelische_Kirche_--_2014_--_9558_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1016	1242
file:Bad_Bentheim,_Kirche_-St._Johannes_der_Täufer-_--_2014_--_9526_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1575	1323
file:Bad_Bentheim,_Martin-Luther-Kirche_--_2014_--_9537_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	890	818
file:Beckum,_Christuskirche_--_2014_--_8707_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	881	847
file:Beckum,_Ehem._Liebfrauen-Kirche_--_2014_--_8706_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1239	1128
file:Beckum,_St.-Stephanus-Kirche_--_2014_--_8709_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1160	1454
file:Beckum,_Windmühle_am_Höxberg_--_2014_--_8717_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1317	1137
file:Billerbeck,_Kapelle_Aulendorf_--_2014_--_9376_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1574	1271
file:Billerbeck,_Kolvenburg_--_2014_--_7576_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1862	1463
file:Billerbeck,_St.-Johannis-Kirche_--_2014_--_4200_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1740	1971
file:Borken,_Burlo,_Evangelische_Kirche_--_2014_--_2286_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1438	1321
file:Buldern,_Alte_Kirche_--_2012_--_1.jpg	1600	1067
file:Buldern,_Alte_Kirche_--_2014_--_9951_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1904	1853
file:Buldern,_Eulenturm_(am_Schloss_Buldern)_--_2013_--_1.jpg	933	1400
file:Buldern,_Großer_Spieker_--_2012_--_1.jpg	872	1200
file:Buldern,_Kleiner_Spieker_--_2012_--_1.jpg	928	1200
file:Buldern,_Kriegerehrenmal_--_2012_--_1.jpg	800	1200
file:Buldern,_Kunstwerk_-Schiene-_--_2011_--_1.jpg	910	1200
file:Buldern,_Kunstwerk_-Toller_Bomberg-_--_2012_--_1.jpg	1201	1400
file:Buldern,_Mitte_des_Kreises_Coesfeld_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1600	1067
file:Buldern,_Schloss_Buldern_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1800	1299
file:Buldern,_Schloss_Buldern_--_2013_--_2.jpg	1800	994
file:Buldern,_Schloss_Buldern_--_3.jpg	1000	698
file:Buldern,_St.-Pankratius-Kirche_--_2013_--_1.jpg	933	1400
file:Buldern,_Wegweiser_auf_dem_Dorfplatz_--_2013_--_1.jpg	802	1400
file:Burgsteinfurt,_St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kirche_--_2014_--_2465_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1570	1423
file:Coesfeld,_St.-Joseph-Kirche_--_2014_--_7746_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1138	942
file:Coesfeld,_Walkenbrückentor_--_2014_--_4078_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1988	1540
file:Coesfeld_Marktplatz.jpg	1280	960
file:Drensteinfurt,_St.-Regina-Kirche_--_2014_--_3888_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1218	1204
file:Dülmen,_Christus-Kirche_--_2014_--_2632_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1235	1405
file:Dülmen,_Freizeitbad_düb.jpg	800	512
file:Dülmen,_Haus_Beck_--_2014_--_8150_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1872	1434
file:Dülmen,_Haus_Osthoff_--_2014_--_8073_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1628	1723
file:Dülmen,_Hermann-Leeser-Schule_--_2014_--_8104_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1866	1095
file:Dülmen,_Hiddingsel,_St.-Georg-Kirche_--_2014_--_4253_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1391	1300
file:Dülmen,_Lüdinghauser_Tor_--_2014_--_8027_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	749	910
file:Dülmen,_Merfeld,_Wildpferdebahn_--_2015_--_6796.jpg	1712	1443
file:Dülmen,_Overbergpassage_--_2014_--_8108_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1518	1054
file:Dülmen,_Overbergschule_--_2014_--_8108_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1720	1169
file:Dülmen,_Sparkasse_--_2014_--_8108_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1691	1265
file:Dülmen,_Sportwagenmanufaktur_Wiesmann_(Gewerbegebiet_Telgenkamp)_--_2005_--_9.jpg	1977	1383
file:Dülmen,_Storch_auf_einer_Wiese_--_2014_--_0050.jpg	1888	1596
file:Dülmen,_Storch_auf_einer_Wiese_--_2014_--_0053.jpg	1865	1979
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_1.jpg	1800	1410
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_2.jpg	1800	1199
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_3.jpg	1800	1336
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_4.jpg	1800	1728
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_5.jpg	1800	945
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_6.jpg	1800	1067
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_7.jpg	1799	1181
file:Dülmen,_Wildpferdefang_1982_--_2010_--_8.jpg	1800	1191
file:Dülmen_-_Kreuzkapelle.jpg	1402	1400
file:Gescher,_Marienkirche_--_2014_--_4107_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1511	1803
file:Glandorf,_Windmühle_--_2014_--_8541_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1454	1486
file:Greven,_Christuskirche_--_2014_--_9873_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1589	1945
file:Hamm,_Heessen,_Yunus-Emre-Moschee_--_2014_--_8831_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1805	1345
file:Hamm,_Kirche_Uentrop_--_2014_--_8791_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1603	1165
file:Hamm,_Maria-Königin-Kirche_--_2014_--_8841_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1383	1378
file:Hamm,_Theresienkirche_--_2014_--_8835_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1777	1490
file:Hausdülmen,_Burgplatz_mit_St.-Mauritius-Kirche_--_4.jpg	1000	469
file:Hausdülmen,_Dorfplatz_--_5.jpg	1800	956
file:Hausdülmen,_Ehrenfriedhof_--_1.jpg	1000	667
file:Hausdülmen,_Große_Teichsmühle_--_3.jpg	1000	667
file:Hausdülmen,_Heubach_--_2.jpg	1000	750
file:Hausdülmen,_St-Mauritius-Kindergarten_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1600	902
file:Hausdülmen,_St.-Mauritius-Schule_--_1.jpg	1000	705
file:Hausdülmen,_St.-Mauritius-Schule_--_2014_--_9057_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1102	722
file:Hausdülmen,_Wegekreuz_(Halterner_Straße)_--_6.jpg	678	1000
file:Havixbeck,_Hohenholte,_St.-Georg-Kirche_--_2014_--_9302_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	974	819
file:Havixbeck,_St.-Dionysus-Kirche_--_2014_--_9364_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	872	963
file:Heek,_St.-Ludgerus-Kirche_--_2014_--_2384_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1702	1372
file:Hiddingsel,_Brennerei_Hellmann_--_1.jpg	1000	674
file:Hiddingsel,_Figur_St._Nepomuk_--_2013_--_1.jpg	628	1200
file:Hiddingsel,_Kreuzigungsgruppe_auf_dem_Friedhof_--_2013_--_1.jpg	724	1199
file:Hiddingsel,_Kriegerdenkmal_--_1-2.jpg	1000	526
file:Hiddingsel,_Kriegerdenkmal_--_1.jpg	1000	504
file:Hiddingsel,_Skulptur_-Frauenschemm-_von_Uta_Krüger-Naumann_an_der_Frauenschemmbrücke_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1600	1067
file:Hiddingsel,_St.-Georg-Kirche_--_2012_--_1.jpg	1800	1395
file:Hiddingsel,_Wassermühle_Schulze-Waltering_--_2013_--_1.jpg	797	1199
file:Hiddingsel,_Wegkreuz_(Hiddostraße)_--_1.jpg	667	1000
file:Isselburg,_Altes_Rathaus_--_2014_--_2084_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1204	1250
file:Isselburg,_Evangelische_Kirche_--_2014_--_2083_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	960	1097
file:Juist,_Inselkirche_--_2014_--_3707.jpg	1407	1758
file:Juist,_Leuchtturm_--_2005_--_1.jpg	1499	1804
file:Kirchspiel,_Empte,_Haus_Empte_--_2013_--_7.jpg	1799	945
file:Kirchspiel,_Karthaus,_Kriegerdenkmal_--_2013_--_11.jpg	1411	1400
file:Kirchspiel,_Karthaus_--_2013_--_12.jpg	1800	1111
file:Kirchspiel,_Leuste,_Alte_Bauerschaftsschule_Leuste_--_2012_--_6.jpg	1015	1400
file:Kirchspiel,_Rödder,_Kriegerdenkmal_--_2013_--_9.jpg	1800	1006
file:Kirchspiel,_Rödder,_Mäusescheune_--_2013_--_8.jpg	1800	1132
file:Kirchspiel,_Rödder,_St.-Michael-Kapelle_--_2010_--_1.jpg	1800	1171
file:Kirchspiel,_Visbeck,_Marienkapelle_--_2011_--_4.jpg	1800	1237
file:Kirchspiel,_Visbeck,_Marienkapelle_und_Haus_Visbeck_--_2011_--_3.jpg	1800	1200
file:Kirchspiel,_Visbeck,_Märchenpfad_(bei_Haus_Visbeck)_--_2011_--_2.jpg	574	1400
file:Kirchspiel,_Weddern,_Anna-Katharinenstift_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1800	1201
file:Kirchspiel,_Weddern,_St.-Jakobus-Kirche_--_2012_--_5.jpg	1603	1400
file:Laer,_Windmühle_--_2014_--_2519_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1652	1799
file:Legden,_St.-Brigida-Kirche_--_2014_--_2312_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1434	1684
file:Lengerich,_Hohne,_Evangelische_Kirche_--_2014_--_9752_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1141	1348
file:Lüdinghausen,_Burg_Kakesbeck_--_2014_--_7312_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1954	1176
file:Lüdinghausen,_Burg_Wolfsberg_--_2014_--_7259.jpg	1305	922
file:Lüdinghausen,_Burg_Wolfsberg_--_2014_--_7271.jpg	940	711
file:Lüdinghausen,_Burg_Wolfsberg_--_2014_--_7274.jpg	761	659
file:Merfeld,_Antoniusstatue_--_2012_--_1.jpg	688	1400
file:Merfeld,_Merfelder_Bruch,_Dülmener_Wildpferde_--_2012_--_1.jpg	1800	958
file:Merfeld,_Ortsansicht_--_2014_--_9130_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1548	1125
file:Merfeld,_St.-Antonius-Kirche_--_2012_--_1.jpg	1025	1400
file:Merfeld,_Wegkreuz_(beim_Haus_Merfeld)_--_2012_--_1.jpg	853	1400
file:Münster,_Dyckburg-Kirche_--_2014_--_8436_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1872	1559
file:Münster,_Montgolfiade_2004_--_2004_--_1.jpg	1704	1794
file:Münster,_Montgolfiade_2004_--_2004_--_4.jpg	1388	1977
file:Münster,_Montgolfiade_2004_--_2004_--_5.jpg	1416	1942
file:Neubeckum,_Christuskirche_--_2014_--_8690_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1039	1219
file:Neubeckum,_St.-Josef-Kirche_--_2014_--_8681_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1438	1831
file:Norderney,_Hafen_--_2006_--_3.jpg	1704	1956
file:Nottuln,_Appelhülsen,_St.-Mariä-Himmelfahrt-Kirche_--_2014_--_3971_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1482	1517
file:Nottuln,_Darup,_Haus_Darup_--_2014_--_4010_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1949	1242
file:Nottuln,_Darup,_St.-Fabian-und-Sebastian-Kirche_--_2014_--_4012_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1738	1550
file:Nottuln,_Kirche_-Unter_dem_Kreuz-_--_2014_--_3988_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	883	852
file:Ochtrup,_Langenhorst,_St.-Johannes-Baptist-Kirche_--_2014_--_9452_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1304	930
file:Ochtrup,_St.-Lamberti-Kirche_--_2014_--_9478_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	890	1154
file:Olfen,_St.-Vitus-Kirche_--_2014_--_8888_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1131	1078
file:Osterwick,_Ss.-Fabian-und-Sebastian-Kirche_--_2014_--_4155_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1389	1401
file:Recke,_St.-Dionysius-Kirche_--_2014_--_9705_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1724	1388
file:Recke,_Steinbeck,_St.-Philippus-und-Jacobus-Kirche_--_2014_--_9638_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	977	1290
file:Rorup,_Bürgerhaus_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1800	1200
file:Rorup,_Haus_Rorup_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1800	1188
file:Rorup,_Haus_Rorup_--_2014_--_9169_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1891	1338
file:Rorup,_Haus_Schwickering_--_2014_--_9159_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1529	1376
file:Rorup,_Kloster_Hamicolt_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1800	922
file:Rorup,_Schandpfahl_(Replikat)_--_2013_--_2.jpg	920	1400
file:Rorup,_Schandpfahl_--_2010_--_1.jpg	869	1399
file:Rorup,_St.-Agatha-Kirche_--_2013_--_1.jpg	1056	1400
file:Rorup,_St.-Agatha-Kirche_--_2014_--_9181_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1953	1848
file:Salzbergen,_St.-Cyriakus-Kirche_--_2014_--_9573_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1265	1328
file:Sassenberg,_Füchtorf,_St.-Mariä-Himmelfahrt-Kirche_--_2014_--_8570_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1460	1609
file:Senden,_Bösensell,_St.-Johann-Baptist-Kirche_--_2014_--_9905_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1123	996
file:Senden,_Bösensell,_St.-Johannes-Baptist-Kirche_--_2014_--_7411_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1776	1861
file:Senden,_Venne,_St.-Johannes-Kirche_--_2014_--_3954_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1024	869
file:Soest,_Bruno-Grundschule_--_2014_--_8754_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1632	1123
file:Soest,_St.-Albertus-Magnus-Kirche_--_2014_--_8738_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1603	1309
file:Tecklenburg,_Evangelische_Stadtkirche_--_2014_--_9773_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1508	1397
file:Tecklenburg,_St.-Michael-Kirche_--_2014_--_9787_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1565	1762
file:Trier,_Hohe_Domkirche_St._Peter_--_2015_--_6145.jpg	1992	1992
file:Velen,_St.-Andreas-Kirche_--_2014_--_7714_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1410	1588
file:Warendorf,_Hoetmar,_St.-Lambertus-Kirche_--_2014_--_8655_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	1526	1415
file:Warendorf,_Milte,_Dorfkirche_--_2014_--_8579_--_Ausschnitt.jpg	650	741
file:Warwick_(Rhode_Island,_USA),_Ford_GT_--_2006_--_1.jpg	1835	1356
file:Warwick_(Rhode_Island,_USA),_Hot_rod_--_2006_--_5.jpg	1898	1362
file:Winterswijk_(Niederlande),_-Jacobskerk_--_2014_--_0174.jpg	1876	1956

-- seth (talk) 12:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1186-92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2016 -- 1176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the deep shade, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Pfannenwagen -- 2016 -- 1204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2016 -- 1252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Kleiner Spieker -- 2012 -- 7108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Großer Spieker -- 2012 -- 7398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Eulenturm (am Schloss Buldern) -- 2013 -- 0969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 19:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Neusträßer Graben -- 2016 -- 1295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Kettbach -- 2016 -- 1296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special mood. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Neusträßer Graben -- 2016 -- 1293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Kettbach -- 2016 -- 1297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2013 -- 0963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Torpedowagen -- 2016 -- 1199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Mitte des Kreises Coesfeld -- 2013 -- 2178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Börnste, Neusträßer Graben -- 2016 -- 1292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Kunstwerk -Toller Bomberg- -- 2012 -- 7378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2013 -- 0521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Freizeitbad düb -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Burgplatz mit St.-Mauritius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 3327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Dorfplatz -- 2012 -- 3779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Große Teichsmühle -- 2012 -- 2931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kreuzkapelle -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Kriegerdenkmal -- 2012 -- 7393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Skulptur -Frauenschemm- von Uta Krüger-Naumann an der Frauenschemmbrücke -- 2013 -- 2218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Wegkapelle (Hiddostraße) -- 2012 -- 7389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, St.-Mauritius-Kindergarten -- 2013 -- 00147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Figur St. Nepomuk -- 2013 -- 0947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alter Jüdischer Friedhof -- 2016 -- 1402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, St.-Mauritius-Schule -- 2012 -- 2909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Brennerei Hellmann -- 2010 -- 3679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Aquarell -- 2016 -- 1356-62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Aquarell -- 2016 -- 1363-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A swimming pool entry at night might be not the most interesting objecdt to take a photo from but I like this modern composition which is sharp enough to bwe a Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Galeria Kaufhof, Eingang -- 2016 -- 1399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Marktbrunnen und historisches Rathaus -- 2016 -- 1335-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2012 -- 3423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, St.-Georg-Kirche -- 2012 -- 7102-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hiddingsel, Wassermühle und Brennerei -- 2013 -- 00141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Karthaus -- 2013 -- 00354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Visbeck, Märchenpfad (bei Haus Visbeck) -- 2011 -- 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Visbeck, Marienkapelle und Haus Visbeck -- 2011 -- 2031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have been sharper but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Weddern, Anna-Katharinenstift -- 2013 -- 00339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rorup, Haus Rorup -- 2013 -- 00408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rorup, Schandpfahl (Replikat) -- 2013 -- 00426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rorup, Kloster Hamicolt -- 2013 -- 00429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2012 -- 7827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, St.-Antonius-Kirche -- 2012 -- 7513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merfeld, Wegkreuz (beim Haus Merfeld) -- 2012 -- 7528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Skulptur -Der gescheiterte Varus- -- 2016 -- 1405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 06:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rorup, St.-Agatha-Kirche -- 2013 -- 00410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Had the tops have been sharper but still good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiddingsel, Kriegerdenkmal -- 2012 -- 7366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Abbrucharbeiten ehem. KiK-Gebäude -- 2016 -- 1410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Abbrucharbeiten ehem. KiK-Gebäude -- 2016 -- 1413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Abbrucharbeiten ehem. KiK-Gebäude -- 2016 -- 1414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bad that the tower was cut off, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alter Jüdischer Friedhof -- 2016 -- 1401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ElBute 15:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Skulptur -Der gescheiterte Varus- -- 2016 -- 1409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm a reviewer who appreciates skilled use of light. The mood is fantastic. Ram-Man 16:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Visbeck, Marienkapelle -- 2011 -- 2145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Lager Herbstwald -- 2016 -- 1474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Wassermühle Schulze Westerath -- 2016 -- 1453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2016 -- 1477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Lager Herbstwald -- 2016 -- 1475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Scheune in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Hotel Steverburg -- 2016 -- 1485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Wassermühle Schulze Westerath -- 2016 -- 1463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The air is soft, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Lager Herbstwald -- 2016 -- 1478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Lager Herbstwald -- 2016 -- 1476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2016 -- 1483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Wassermühle Schulze Westerath -- 2016 -- 1458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1488-94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Sehr gelungen, vielleicht etwas zuviel Magenta, eine Spur! --Hubertl 04:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. New WB. --XRay 08:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haltern am See, Skulptur -Der gescheiterte Varus- -- 2016 -- 1409.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Skulptur -Der gescheiterte Varus- -- 2016 -- 1409.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Lager Herbstwald -- 2016 -- 1481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Scheune in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1516-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent artistic image, sharp beautiful focus to the foreground and background is unsharp --Michielverbeek 06:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1523-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Per Michiel. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Gymnasium -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1488-94 - bw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gorgeous artistic photograph. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2013 -- 9826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Stunning motive. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Categorization

Hi, XRay! Thank You for amazing pictures. What do You think about categorizing by time terms, but not sufficiently by objects fixed. E.g. if You in several fixed amazing bodies of water fixed category [some geografic name, I'm not familiar with, year], I, as user would like to know, which body of water is it. If it is on river/brook, I'd like to understand (quickly/easily), which (what is its name) river/brook is it, tributary of which body of water is it (by categorisation). Thank You. Cheers! --Kusurija (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Both images you've added categories are already categorized by Category:Schéissendëmpel. Adding categories like Category:Black Ernz is treated as overcategorization. Please have a look to the categories of the categories too. --XRay ^talk 22:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Dülmen photo

Hi, XRay. Another photo I was going to nominate was this one. But is it a photo you're proud of and consider a worthy FP candidate, and do you think that if nominated, it would have a chance of being featured?

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, this image may have a chance. Some people don't like images like this, but IMO there is a good chance to become FP. Thanks! --XRay ^talk 07:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Ja, es ist gut, ich habe es schon bei QI so gesehen! --Hubertl 22:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your proposal. I'll nominate the image. --XRay ^talk 10:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Ja, das Wetter...

ich orientiere mich inzwischen ausschließlich nach dem Blick aus dem Fenster. Der Fotokoffer ist fertiggepackt, meine Motive sind im Prinzip alle in 2-3-Stationen-U-Bahn-Reichweite. Vorgestern machte ich eine Ausnahme, ich benötigte für ein neues Projekt einfach eine Reihe von Übersichtsfotos. Ein Museum, 146m lang, an die 60m breit. Und Statuen, praktisch ohne Ende (angeblich sollen es 250 sein). Ich muss mich erst mal sammeln, sonst weiß ich später nicht, was tatsächlich dann wohin gehört, auch bin ich noch auf erweiterte Literatursuche.

Aber wenns klar ist, nur ein paar Wolkerl am Himmel (mein Lieblingswetter) - es darf nur nicht schlierig sein, das ist furchtbar, schlimmer noch als bewölkt, dann ist meine Zeit gekommen.

Ich wünsch´ Dir Ähnliches bis in den Herbst hinein!

Gruß aus Wien, --Hubertl 22:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC) PS: Du hast mit ein paar Bildern wirklich ein gutes Händchen bewiesen, man sieht es an der Zustimmung der POTY-Juroren!

Da muss ich wesentlich komplizierter planen. In Münster benötige ich ein Auto, fahre aber in Fahrgemeinschaft. Da plane ich den Tag und manchmal habe ich Pech. Letzte Woche war der Tag gut angekündigt, das Wetter wurde dann aber einheitlich grau. :-( Ich habe dann trotzdem ein paar Aufnahmen gemacht und mich damit getröstet, dass es wenigstens keine harten Schatten gab. Aber es wird auch wieder Gelegenheiten geben ... Ein paar nette Touren sind dieses Jahr geplant. Ich wünsche dir allzeit gutes Licht! --XRay ^talk 22:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Eulenhaus -- 2016 -- 1540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Tor -- 2016 -- 1563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Baumberge -- 2016 -- 1484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Wassermühle Schulze Westerath -- 2016 -- 1464-70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good work --Moroder 12:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havixbeck, Stift Tilbeck -- 2016 -- 1438-46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs imo reduction of size by 50% to reduce posterisation --Moroder 09:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I can't see posterisation. Do you really waited for fully loading the image? --XRay 14:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Sorry, browsers fault which magnified it too much --Moroder 14:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2013 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Wasserbär -- 2016 -- 1552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Zentralfriedhof -- 2016 -- 1569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Zentralfriedhof -- 2016 -- 1573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Wasserbär -- 2016 -- 1545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Tor -- 2016 -- 1564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Eulenhaus -- 2016 -- 1541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok für mich, ich frage mich nur, ob bei euch auch mal die Sonne scheint? --Hubertl 21:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Das frage ich mich auch manchmal. Am Tag danach war's soweit, da hatte ich nur keine Zeit. Ärgerlich. Aber ein neuer Versuch kann kommen. Von Münster sagt man zudem, dass es entweder regnet oder die Glocken läuten. ;-) --XRay 09:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Wasserbär -- 2016 -- 1549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Wasserbär -- 2016 -- 1544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Alter Zoo, Wasserbär -- 2016 -- 1565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westfälische Schule für Musik -- 2016 -- 1539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Zentralfriedhof -- 2016 -- 1570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

POTD

Hi Dietmar I want to put up a picture of a noisy Brazilian bird to celebrate the opening of the Olympic Games on 5 August. Would you mind if I move your bales image to 9 August or 10 August? Many thanks, Charles (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: You can move it to another date in August if you like. There is no need for a special date for this image. --XRay ^talk 16:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Charles (talk) 09:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I moved the template and then undid it which was obviously not the right thing do to. Now the image is blocking two days 5th and 8th. Any idea how to correct my error? Thanks. Charles (talk) 11:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

I think there is a redirect page now. Just create the (new) pages (file, descriptions) for my image at the 8th and put your new content to the pages at the 5th. Renaming doesn't work. --XRay ^talk 11:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I've just moved all data for you. The 5th is prepared for your file and descriptions. --XRay ^talk 11:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks. Charles (talk) 10:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring, Jesuitenfriedhof -- 2016 -- 1765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Ausgrabungsarbeiten -- 2016 -- 1842-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Feld -- 2016 -- 1780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Feld in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1783.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Trees/Forests

[1]

Wollen wir vielleicht direkt Wälder und Einzelbäume trennen? Ich habe zumindest bei mir schon eine User-Kategorie: Category:Quality images of forests by User:Atamari. --Atamari (talk) 09:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Das wäre zumindest eine Alternative, wenn die Kategorien nicht zu klein werden. "Forests" wäre auch ein Teil von "Landscapes" und "Trees". Das Problem, dass ich mir über Zuordnungen nicht ganz im Klaren bin, habe ich öfter. Bei den QIs gibt's zudem noch die (leidvoll überfüllten) Galerien. Meine Bilder kontrolliere ich regelmäßig mit einem Bot, der mir auch anzeigt, wenn genutzte Kategorien zu groß werden. Es ist arg viel Aufwand, Ordnung in die Sache zu bekommen. Mir schwebt auch ein Bot vor, der in passende Kategorien einsortiert. Beispielsweise unter "Trees" die QIs in "QIs of Trees". Leider fehlen mir zu oft abfragbare Metadaten, beispielsweise eine Geo-Lokalisierung. Ach, den ganzen Kategorien fehlen so einige Möglichkeiten. (Ärgerlich sind auch diverse Sortierschlüssel, deren Nutzen nur Eingeweihte verstehen.) Aber das wäre schon eine Grundsatzdiskussion wert. --XRay ^talk 10:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Ja, so einige Grundsatzfragen finde auch noch unzureichend beantwortet. Wie sind die Sortierkriterien bzs. Sortierschlüssel. Auch sind einige Kategorien mal so mal so strukturiert. Aber wahrscheinlich können wir kurz- und mittelfristig nur hier und da strukturieren. Und da schlage ich vor, Einzelbäume und Wälder zu trennen. Und Trees (also Einzelbäume) wäre eine Unterkategorie von Plants (Pflanzen). In wie weit Trees und Forests Unter- und Oberkategorie sind, kann ich jetzt auch nicht auf Anhieb sagen. --Atamari (talk) 11:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

p.s. später auch Alleen. --Atamari (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Ich würde Forests als Unterkategorie von Trees und Landscapes nehmen. Und Trees unter Plants. --XRay ^talk 11:58, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Trees/Category:Forests nach den nicht-QI-Kategorien sieht das nicht so aus und an denen müssen wir uns richten. "nature of germany -> plants of germany" passt dann m.M. wieder für beide. --Atamari (talk) 12:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Irgendwie hast du recht. Ich habe mir die Kategorien mal angesehen. Meine Annahme war schlicht, dass ein Wald eine Ansammlung von Bäumen ist. Dem ist aber nicht so, da gibt es weit mehr Kategorien. Also schließe ich mich an, die Kategorisierung sollte so erfolgen, wie sie bereits ist. --XRay ^talk 15:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1523-9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1523-9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Münsterstraße, Fundamente -- 2016 -- 1848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 1856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 1857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wald am Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 1859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Münsterstraße, Fundamente -- 2016 -- 1846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Ausgrabungsarbeiten -- 2016 -- 1845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Feld -- 2016 -- 1779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1791-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wiese in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1798-804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 1854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wald am Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 1862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Münsterstraße, Fundamente -- 2016 -- 1851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, WL-Bank -- 2016 -- 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right side seems to lean a little, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry. You're right. It's fixed now. --XRay 06:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2016 -- 1928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1878-84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, WL-Bank -- 2016 -- 1919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1904-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, WL-Bank -- 2016 -- 1922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, WL-Bank -- 2016 -- 1925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Consider to get rid of the disturbing parts in the bottom right corner (see note) --Cccefalon 04:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks. It's fixed ... and better now. :-) --XRay 16:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur an der WL-Bank -- 2016 -- 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 23:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1911-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Tsungam 07:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Dear Dietmar, I'm jealous of your wonderful compositions and the light so wonderful on your photos that you share. Thank you very much for your images. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Merci! Thank you very much. --XRay ^talk 09:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, DEA-Tankstelle -- 2016 -- 1972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support excellent --Christian Ferrer 07:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Kannebrocksbach -- 2016 -- 2002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Seitenansicht -- 2012 -- 8717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brückenbaustelle der Deutschen Bahn -- 2016 -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brückenbaustelle der Deutschen Bahn -- 2016 -- 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brückenbaustelle der Deutschen Bahn -- 2016 -- 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, DEA-Tankstelle -- 2016 -- 1975-81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Waldweg -- 2016 -- 2000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 1893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 16:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo XRay,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Oedlerteich im Sonnenuntergang

Hi, Dietmar. I love this picture. Is that one you think would be merit a FP nomination? If so, please nominate it, or I can do so in a few days if you like.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your proposol. I think you are right. I would like to remark that there might be more candidates on sunday. (I hope so.) Some pictures are waiting for Wiki Loves Earth 2016. The upload is already prepared, I'll start nominating images on sunday too. Feel free to nominate the images you like. Thanks in advance. :-) --XRay ^talk 09:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Certainly. I currently have 2 noms up, so I have to wait a bit. I look forward to seeing the other pictures! Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulptur -Wäscherin- (Borkener Straße) -- 2011 -- 3743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 02:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kreisverkehr Münsterstraße-Auf dem Quellberg -- 2011 -- 2602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bärenskulptur -- 2013 -- 2135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Visbeck, BMW i3 -- 2016 -- 1631-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Have you won the BMW? Good quality. Photos and car.--Famberhorst 15:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Sandstraße, BMW i3 -- 2016 -- 1748-54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main Object good quality. I think halos in the trees on the left.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Franzosenbach -- 2016 -- 1805-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Oedlerteich (Heubachniederung) -- 2015 -- 0205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Fischteiche -- 2016 -- 1991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Lyrical and poetical. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8306-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8291-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Welter Bach -- 2016 -- 1830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7942-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8316-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wald in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wald in der Bauerschaft Börnste -- 2016 -- 1985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Franzosenbach -- 2016 -- 1812-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 07:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Welter Bach -- 2016 -- 1832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 05:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stever (NSG Lippeaue) -- 2016 -- 1776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7947-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1929-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp beautiful photo without noise, foreground and main object (the sun) are in good balance --Michielverbeek 03:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8306-10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8306-10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Torfvennteich -- 2016 -- 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8371-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stever (NSG Lippeaue) -- 2016 -- 1770-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8346-50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Vogelschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7980-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Torfvennteich -- 2016 -- 2006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8399-403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Vogelschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Welter Bach -- 2016 -- 1827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice motive and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Fischteiche -- 2016 -- 1995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8226-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7985-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Torfvennteich -- 2016 -- 2003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8404-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Fischteiche -- 2016 -- 1988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Vogelschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinxperlo (NL), Flaggenskulptur -- 2016 -- 2328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition from a place I know --Michielverbeek 05:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Vogelschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8326-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I'd rather a bit more contrast. --ElBute 12:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Welter Bach -- 2016 -- 1834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8331-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Gagelbruch Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmerich am Rhein, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmerich am Rhein, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:46, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 4144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wald bei den Fischteichen -- 2016 -- 1984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8236-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Golden mood. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Fischteiche -- 2016 -- 1994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful composition, gentle and smooth. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Gagelbruch Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Inviting to hike through. Very nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very special. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Gagelbruch Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Gagelbruch Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:35, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1952-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 01:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Vogelschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)  Question - Is the water frozen? I think it is, although that seems surprising with all the greenery around it, but there's a problem with glare in this picture at full size. I don't know if that would stand in the way of this being a Quality Image, but I felt like mentioning it. -- Ikan Kekek 04:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC) Frozen? No, the photo was taken in may. There is a lot of dirt, dust and pollen on the water. It looks like unsharp in real too, but it isn't. --XRay 15:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 4141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Gagelbruch Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 4135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Invitation - Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2016 - Jury

Hello, based in the quality and level of your contributions, I would like to invite you to join the WLE Brasil Jury that will be responsible to evaluate the TOP500 pictures and elect the Brazilian winners that will be selected for the international phase of the contest.

Our contest will be running until June 30 and the filtering proccess and winners election will be after that date.

For sure your participation will improve our final quality and results. Best regards Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your invitation. It's very interesting but - sorry - not possible for me this year.--XRay ^talk 05:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1949.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1949.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7985-9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7985-9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful landscape. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Rheinpromenade -- 2016 -- 2295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Smart composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brückenbaustelle der Deutschen Bahn -- 2016 -- 2329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Aasee -- 2016 -- 2362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Historische Marktplatzpumpe -- 2016 -- 2317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 4138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Schiffe auf dem Rhein -- 2016 -- 2294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Charming sunset. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2280-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2016 -- 4146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Fischteiche -- 2016 -- 1983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Naturschutzgebiet Gagelbruch Borkenberge -- 2016 -- 2286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Charming motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brückenbaustelle der Deutschen Bahn -- 2016 -- 2333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2348-54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Franzosenbach -- 2016 -- 1819-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Rhein -- 2016 -- 2307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmerich am Rhein, Rheinpromenade -- 2016 -- 2318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM -- 2016 -- 2336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Wewerka-Pavillon -- 2016 -- 2365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weeze, Flughafen -- 2016 -- 2508-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Boote am Aasee -- 2016 -- 2371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2016 -- 2393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rees, Skulptur -Freundschaft verbindet- -- 2016 -- 2303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Restaurant -A2 am See- -- 2016 -- 2369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Giant Pool Balls- -- 2016 -- 2379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Weeze, Flughafen -- 2016 -- 2522-8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weeze, Flughafen -- 2016 -- 2522-8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Boote am Aasee -- 2016 -- 2375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur -- 2016 -- 2391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Toleranz durch Dialog- -- 2016 -- 2457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Anerkennung!

Auf diesen Kalender kannst du wirklich stolz sein! Da steckt viel Herzblut, aber auch Fleiß dahinter! --Hubertl 09:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Danke! War mal eine Idee ... Für den einen oder anderen Themenkalender habe ich übrigens auch noch Bilder. Ja, es war ein enig Arbeit. Da hst du recht. Aber es gibt auch nette Hilfsmittel. --XRay ^talk 09:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikimedia Deutschland könnte doch einen Druckkostenbeitrag dafür bezahlen. Einfach mal bei Veronika Krämer anfragen. Nette, sehr hilfreiche Leute, sag einfach, dass ich auch der Meinung bin, dass man sowas fördern soll Vielleicht macht das Schule! --Hubertl 07:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, St.-Nepomuk-Statue am Aasee -- 2016 -- 2383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park am Aasee -- 2016 -- 2381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, quality high enough for a Q1photo, BTW-last month I slept in Münster-Jügendherberge and you have had much more luck than me for making the photo --Michielverbeek 05:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Rheinpromenade, Japantag 2016 -- 2016 -- 2579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weeze, Flughafen -- 2016 -- 2529-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very beautiful shot. --Code 04:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Toleranz durch Dialog- -- 2016 -- 2477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Toleranz durch Dialog- -- 2016 -- 2479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo, but it might be a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 07:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Stadtmodell am Michaelisplatz -- 2016 -- 2437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Kletterwald Haltern -- 2016 -- 2559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Promenade -- 2016 -- 2385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Antenne- -- 2016 -- 2363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A tighter crop with less shadow and branches would make it even better. --Cccefalon 04:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks. It's fixed (and better). --XRay 04:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM -- 2016 -- 2335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me under this lightening conditions. Where are the other pictures with the sun behind? --Hubertl 09:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Sorry. I've taken only a few shots at sunset. --XRay 10:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Irrtümlich ist dieses QI-Bild auf meiner Diskussionsseite gelandet. Ich reiche es hiermit an Dich weiter:

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weeze, Flughafen -- 2016 -- 2522-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please, have a look at the note: "Dieses Bild war am 4. September 2016 Bild des Tages."--Johann Jaritz 04:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  CommentSorry. The template does not know the future. A minor problem, there is much more time behind the date. ;-) --XRay 04:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment It is just insignificant, of course. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Viele herzliche Grüße aus Kärnten. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Rheinpromenade, Japantag 2016 -- 2016 -- 2575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support «Una festa sui prati» (Adriano Celentano). Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Rheinpromenade, Japantag 2016 -- 2016 -- 2574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park am Aasee -- 2016 -- 2380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo. I would only crop more in the bottom and delete the bird in the front; the shadows don't add anything to the photo --Michielverbeek 06:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)  FixedThanks. It's fixed now. --XRay 06:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, it's looking better like this --Michielverbeek 21:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Toleranz durch Dialog- -- 2016 -- 2476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Karthäuser Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 2683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2016 -- 2555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

FP nom suggestion

Hi, Dietmar. For whatever it's worth, I think you should nominate this. The sky is a bit hazy, but otherwise, it's a great picture. I'd also be willing to nominate it soon, if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

I think that's a good idea. But I will wait for September - Wiki Loves Monuments. There are other pictures from this series waiting for upload. May be there is a better one. --XRay ^talk 13:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

I'll look forward to seeing those. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Wewerka-Pavillon -- 2016 -- 2367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Karthäuser Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 4699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Aasee -- 2016 -- 2368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, NSG Karthäuser Mühlenbach -- 2016 -- 4698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Ausgrabungen am Rathaus -- 2016 -- 4172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Toleranz durch Dialog- -- 2016 -- 2473.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Rheinpromenade, Japantag 2016 -- 2016 -- 2581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2358 -- crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
WL-Bank in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (View from street Weseler Straße).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2634-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Brücke am Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Japantag 2016 -- 2016 -- 2573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Ausgrabungen am Rathaus -- 2016 -- 4173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Ausgrabungen am Rathaus -- 2016 -- 4174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 05:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Mühle am Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2612-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Famberhorst 05:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Eulenturm am Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Brücke am Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brunnen an der Sparkasse -- 2016 -- 2712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 4691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Wegekreuz an der Zufahrt zum Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 05:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2655-61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee -- 2016 -- 2867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Münsterplatz, Domlädchen -- 2016 -- 2728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Eulenturm am Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose disturbing overexposition --Christian Ferrer 07:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry. You're right. But I think it's fixed now. Please check the image again. --XRay 08:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC) ok --Christian Ferrer 14:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 4687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object. When making such kind of photos the front wil always be unsharp, so IMO you might crop the bottom a bit --Michielverbeek 05:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. You're right, it's better. --XRay 06:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Zufahrt zum Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Brunnen an der Sparkasse -- 2016 -- 2713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Münsterplatz, Domlädchen -- 2016 -- 2730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee -- 2016 -- 2868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Christian Ferrer 05:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Münsterplatz, Möschebrunnen -- 2016 -- 2727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Münsterplatz, Liebesschloss -- 2016 -- 2726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2016 -- 2610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 12:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spatzenbrunnen or Möschebrunnen in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Now it's done. --XRay ^talk 03:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Now OK. ‍‍‍‍ ~ Moheen ^(talk) 12:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Hausecke -- 2016 -- 2733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Dom, Grabplatte -Carolo Magno- -- 2016 -- 2719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Dom -- 2016 -- 2724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Dom, Grabplatte -Carolo Magno- -- 2016 -- 2719 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Dom -- 2016 -- 2723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Brunnen -Fischpüddelchen- -- 2016 -- 2740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments People are somewhat disturbing, but good quality.--Famberhorst 05:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Schiff -- 2016 -- 2869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Gräser am Ufer -- 2016 -- 2887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You may want to remove the small dust spot at the very left --A.Savin 02:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed. Sorry, I haven't seen it. --XRay 17:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Karlsbrunnen und Rathaus -- 2016 -- 2773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 12:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Anleger -- 2016 -- 2875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Domsingschule -- 2016 -- 2765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your explanation.
Sincerely,
--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Kiosk am Markt -- 2016 -- 2814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Puppenbrunnen -- 2016 -- 2781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Skulptur -Stelzenläufer- -- 2016 -- 2789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Hermann-Heusch-Platz, Europa -- 2016 -- 2795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Upper part of the air cut would be nice, but good for me.--Famberhorst 17:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Brunnen -Türelüre-Lißje- -- 2016 -- 2788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Skulptur -Der Durchbruch- -- 2016 -- 2805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Hermann-Heusch-Platz -- 2016 -- 2799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Skulptur -Stelzenläufer- -- 2016 -- 2793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Baumrinde (am Haus Hörn) -- 2016 -- 2850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Skulptur -Der Durchbruch- -- 2016 -- 2806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good enough for a Q1photo. Focus good to main object. Background is a bit noisy;a sunny might have give a more beautiful photo --Michielverbeek 05:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, St.-Sebastian-Kirche -- 2016 -- 2839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Prinzenhof -- 2016 -- 2835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light Pole left seems to have an aura, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Brunnen -Kreislauf des Geldes- -- 2016 -- 2817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Funny sculpture, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Hermann-Heusch-Platz -- 2016 -- 2807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Skulptur -Stelzenläufer- -- 2016 -- 2791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 05:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Hermann-Heusch-Platz -- 2016 -- 2801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Dom -- 2016 -- 2717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 11:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Baumrinde (am Haus Hörn) -- 2016 -- 2852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. What is the name of the tree of the bark?--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Büchertauschschrank an der Ahornstraße -- 2016 -- 2840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stelzenläufer (Krista Löneke-Kemmerling, 1983), Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doemjrof (Hubert Löneke, 1983), Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Hermann-Heusch-Büste -- 2016 -- 2798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Büchertauschschrank an der Ahornstraße -- 2016 -- 2841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Fahrrad am Holländischen Brookfleet -- 2016 -- 2975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sehr schön! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Bänke am St.-Annen-Platz -- 2016 -- 2992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Brunnen -Hühnerdieb- -- 2016 -- 2816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo but I cannot read die Speisekarte --Michielverbeek 05:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Puppenbrunnen -- 2016 -- 2783.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Skulptur -Doemjrof- -- 2016 -- 2802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but I am not sure if you are perhaps wrong with the sculpture. Pse see my note - it does not look like a girl. --Cccefalon 04:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment ;-) I'll check it. Here is the source of the description: de:Liste_der_Denkmäler,_Brunnen_und_Skulpturen_in_Aachen. --XRay 04:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment It's right. [2]. I can't believe it. --XRay 04:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Der richtige Titel ist "Doemjrof" und Wikipedia liefert auch die korrekte Erklärung Als Doemjrof (Domgraf) bezeichnen die Aachener die Lausbuben/Mädchen, die in der Nähe des Domes wohnten; Bronze. Lausbub ist auch richtig. Hier hat Wikipedia wohl mehr aus etwas gemacht als der Künstler beabsichtigte. Diese Lehrstunde in Humanbiologie war übrigens kostenlos. --Cccefalon 04:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment In der Ratsvorlage heißt es halt auch "Sitzendes Mädchen". Ich hoffe nicht, dass sich diese auch der Wikipedia bedient hat. Dann ginge es im Kreis.--XRay 04:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Hab's geändert. --XRay 04:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Die KAtegorie müsste wohl auch entsprechend geändert werden. Oder es bleibt und wir packen noch "Transgender" dazu :) --Cccefalon 05:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Kapuzinerkarree -- 2016 -- 2832.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Prinzenhof -- 2016 -- 2837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 2951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Laterne an den Magellan-Terrassen -- 2016 -- 3019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Bebauung am Sandtorkai -- 2016 -- 3036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Pickhuben -- 2016 -- 2997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Brooksfleet -- 2016 -- 2985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Sandtorhafen-Traditionsschiffhafen -- 2016 -- 3017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 06:49, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Magellan-Terrassen -- 2016 -- 3012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Dom -- 2016 -- 2715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Magellan-Terrassen -- 2016 -- 3014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Schild am Brooksfleet -- 2016 -- 2990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Kran am Kaiserkai (und Elbphilharmonie) -- 2016 -- 3029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Schiffe im Sandtorhafen-Traditionsschiffhafen -- 2016 -- 3028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. beautiful urban picture. --Marrovi 03:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Parkhaus Speicherstadt -- 2016 -- 3001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Sandtorhafen-Traditionsschiffhafen -- 2016 -- 3022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Fahrrad am Holländischen Brookfleet -- 2016 -- 2977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 2971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Liebesschlösser an der Poggenmühlenbrücke -- 2016 -- 2918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Sandtorhafen-Traditionsschiffhafen -- 2016 -- 3023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Block W -- 2016 -- 2958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Neuerwegsbrücke -- 2016 -- 2982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Neuerwegsbrücke -- 2016 -- 2981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:28, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Laterne an den Magellan-Terrassen -- 2016 -- 3020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Elbphilharmonie -- 2016 -- 3051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Kreuzfahrtschiff -Queen Mary 2- im Dock -- 2016 -- 3065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 2956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Bebauung am Sandtorkai -- 2016 -- 3024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 19:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Bebauung am Sandtorkai -- 2016 -- 3027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, the left side is slightly leaning in and could be enhanced with total rectilinearity. --Cccefalon 04:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. IMO it's fixed. --XRay 11:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Denkmal -Madonna der Seefahrt- -- 2016 -- 3070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Kreuzfahrtschiff -Queen Mary 2- im Dock -- 2016 -- 3069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, St.-Pauli-Fischmarkt (und Hafen) -- 2016 -- 3072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2016 -- 3089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition large sky adds a lot to it. Unfortunately main object is too dark by shadows, however a Q1one --Michielverbeek 18:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Zollkanal (und Katharinenkirche) -- 2016 -- 3004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 06:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Kannengießerortbrücke, Block P (und Katharinenkirche) -- 2016 -- 2986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 06:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna der Seefahrt (or "Madonna der Meere") at Fischmarkt Hamburg-Altona (St.-Pauli-Fischmarkt) in Hamburg, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, St.-Pauli-Elbtunnel -- 2016 -- 3101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Kreuzfahrtschiff -Queen Mary 2- -- 2016 -- 3050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Block H -- 2016 -- 2998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the second person left whose head barely be seen, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 05:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Brunnen -Kreislauf des Geldes- -- 2016 -- 2819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The background, specially on the left is pretty confusing. I'm not sure this can be QI --Moroder 18:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)  Info It's a exposure time of 1/5 s to show (a little bit) the movement of the water inside the fountain. If you think it's not good enough for QI, just decline it. No problem. --XRay 10:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Comment Xray, please read what I wrote in my comment. It's not about focus but about composition. Cheers --Moroder 20:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed I've read your comment. I thought you mean the blurred person at the left. The person is blurred because of the exposure time user for the fountain. Now there is a closer crop and the image is better. --XRay 06:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 05:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Barockfabrik Kulturhaus -- 2016 -- 2804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please fix the vertical lines --Moroder 18:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks for your review. It's fixed now. --XRay 11:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 05:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserschloss (view from the „Poggenmühlenbrücke“), Speicherstadt, Hamburg, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)  Support Usefull. --Pierre André (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Result:2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, St.-Pauli-Elbtunnel -- 2016 -- 3098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Elbphilharmonie -- 2016 -- 3062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Bebauung am Sandtorkai -- 2016 -- 3037-41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good urban picture. --Marrovi 04:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Elbphilharmonie (und Mahatma-Gandhi-Brücke) -- 2016 -- 3054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Block P (und Katharinenkirche) -- 2016 -- 3003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Holländischbrookfleet und Block S -- 2016 -- 2984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, HafenCity, Elbphilharmonie -- 2016 -- 3062 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very artistic composition in black and white. Sky looks in first instance a bit overexposed, but it is not --Michielverbeek 05:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Poller -- 2016 -- 3093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Kreuzfahrtschiff -Queen Mary 2- im Dock -- 2016 -- 3068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, St.-Pauli-Fischmarkt (und Hafen) -- 2016 -- 3071-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, St.-Pauli-Elbtunnel -- 2016 -- 3099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Kannengießerortbrücke, Block P (und Katharinenkirche) -- 2016 -- 3002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Landungsbrücken -- 2016 -- 3107-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Buildings are leaning to the left in the area of St.Michaels church--Ermell 06:52, 27 June 2016 (UTC)  Fixed Rebuild with perspective fix. Thanks for your review. --XRay 17:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Beschreibung

Hallo Dietmar, Du machst mich auf einen Fehler in meinen Bildbeschreibungen aufmerksam, den ich aber nicht sehe. Ist es die fehlende andere Version, die noch in Arbeit ist, oder was müsste ich ändern? Herzliche Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 18:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Im Text selbst ist kein Problem, aber da stehen zwei leere Anweisungen [[Image: |thumb|left]] [[Image: |thumb|left]]. Und die Kategorie hast du ja wahrscheinlich schon gesehen. --XRay ^talk 19:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Ja, wie gesagt, die leeren Anweisungen sollen noch gefüllt werden. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hatte ich mir wohl gedacht. So sah es etwas komisch aus. Man kann mit <!-- ... --> auch auskommentieren. Aber das ist dir als altem Hasen hier sicherlich nichts Neues. --XRay ^talk 20:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen, Brunnen -Türelüre-Lißje- -- 2016 -- 2785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Landungsbrücken -- 2016 -- 3110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2016 -- 3176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Landungsbrücken -- 2016 -- 3173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Kibbelstegbrücke -- 2016 -- 3007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Block M+N und E am Brooksfleet -- 2016 -- 3009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Compliments on your Hamburg pictures!

I'm really enjoying them. And I think this one is special, regardless of some blown highlights and maybe even partly because of them. But I wonder whether you are more critical of your own picture than I am. So what do you think of it? Would you nominate it for FP or vote for it on FPC? Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm very glad too read your message. :-) I put this image in my list for nominations, but I'll wait for September (Wiki Loves Monuments). There is an image waiting for upload which one is better then the image you proposed. Let's wait for September. Hopefully there are other images for FPC. --XRay ^talk 10:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Kontorhausviertel, Chilehaus -- 2016 -- 3397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Marrovi 04:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Kreuzfahrtschiff -Queen Mary 2- -- 2016 -- 3159-65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition. --Marrovi 04:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Barkasse -Kurt Abicht- -- 2016 -- 3120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Block S -- 2016 -- 3337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, St.-Pauli-Elbtunnel -- 2016 -- 3103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice symmetry --Daniel Case 16:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 3301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful composition.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Schwedische Gustaf-Adolfs-Kirche (und Elbphilharmonie) -- 2016 -- 3171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Elbphilharmonie -- 2016 -- 3129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2016 -- 3126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, U-Bahn-Station -Landungsbrücken- -- 2016 -- 3174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Schiff -Cap San Diego- -- 2016 -- 3122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 3294-300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2016 -- 3128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2016 -- 3118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Kontorhausviertel, Chilehaus -- 2016 -- 3436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen, Schiff -Cap San Diego- -- 2016 -- 3116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg, Kontorhausviertel, Sprinkenhof -- 2016 -- 3384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hoffentlich in Ordnung

Aber auf diesem Bild ist Weizen und kein Roggen. Das Beigras müsste Quecke sein. Sicher bestimmbar für mich allerdings fast nur wenn ich ein Blatt im Detail hätte. MfG --Verum ([[User talk:Verum|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Danke! Ehrlich gesagt habe ich kaum Ahnung von Pflanzen, war mir diesmal eigentlich sicher. Trugschluss. --XRay ^talk 13:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Stair rail in Bagni di Lucca

You are, of course, quite correct.This one should go. I have other images of the railing which may after some work be acceptable.Many thanks for your time and best regards from Ireland Notafly ([[User talk:Notafly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Just for your information: If you think you can fix the problems, please fix it and switch from decline to discuss. - Ireland. Wonderful. I should visit your country. Greetings from the Münsterland. --XRay ^talk 19:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo XRay,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Terme Caldo, Bagni di Lucca

Hello again. Thanks for this and other reviews.My photos other than film (analogue) are taken with Leica compact cameras hence the perspective distortions. When this is corrected other problems show (too technical for me-jpeg artefacts). So I will instead try and find photos where perspective is not an issue.Very many thanks for your help and best regards Notafly ([[User talk:Notafly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

IMO the way to take photographs consists of three steps: preparing/planning, taking and post processing the photograph. The last step can be done with software like Adobe Lightroom (my way for most of my images). I'm taking RAW files (with my compact camera too), but minor processing is possible with JPEG files too. (Each JPEG loses quality while processing, even with 100 percent quality.) So you can fix the perspective distortions with the post processing too. There exists a lot of software to do this. It's easy to do. (The best solution is to use a tilt-shift lens, but it's expensive. I don't use this kind of lens.) --XRay ^talk 05:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

The images were corrected by a freind who used Photoshop. I have Gimp 2 but am still learning. I will investigate raw. The Leicas are superb but I still find using them properly difficult.It is the menus.I also frame photos as if cropping could only be done with scissors or tape.Habits die hard Notafly ([[User talk:Notafly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Template:Ping GIMP or Adobe Photoshop are really too much and you become frustrated before you'll have success. Adobe Photoshop Elements and Adobe Lightroom are easier to handle especially for beginners. There may be other good software too. More than 90 percent of my post processing is done by Adobe Lightroom. It's the recommendation in my photo workshops too. If Lightroom does not work for me, I'm using Photoshop Elements, Photomatix and other special software. And: Leica is a really good camera, but their cameras can't fix problems like perspective distortion or diffraction. It's just physics. And JPEG is always a problem - just 8 bit. Your camera sensor is better than JPEG. And please remember: The camera is just a tool. --XRay ^talk 18:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

I forgot. The JPEG artifacts are a result of compression. Typical for JPEG. The filesize of your first image is much larger than the second one. And sorry for my simple english. I'm not a native speaker. --XRay ^talk 18:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou.Your explanation is very clear.I did not know that the JPEG artifacts were, in this case a result of compression (I had noticed the much smaller file size) which explains why the images were faulty in that respect.You are right about cameras.They do not choose the subject or the all important light.Many thanks for taking the time to provide such good advice.Best regards Notafly ([[User talk:Notafly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Your English is very good.I would not have known that it was not your first language.

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-33

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

• Last week Tech News announced you will get a notification when you mention yourself the same way as if someone else had mentioned you. This caused some problems and will happen later instead. [3]
• Creating and editing links to sections on other pages on the wiki now works again in the visual editor. [4]
• For some users, cross-wiki notifications haven't been working properly. The count has been wrong when only cross-wiki notifications were present. The cross-wiki bundle has been showing only the names of wikis and not the actual notifications. This will be fixed soon. [5][6]

Changes this week

• The login session when you choose "Keep me logged in" will now last a year. Previously it was 30 days. This will happen on August 16. [7]
• Some abuse filters will have to be updated during the week. This is because a bug will be fixed. [8]
• In compact language links, two new kinds of languages will be shown in the shorter language list: Languages that are used in the article's text, and languages where the article has a badge like "featured article" or "good article". [9][10]
• The visual editor will be available by default for logged-out editors on Wikipedias that use the Arabic script. It is already default for logged-in editors. [11]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from August 16. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from August 17. It will be on all wikis from August 18 (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on August 16 at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Starting the week of August 22 there will be three software deployment windows. They will be at 13:00, 18:00, and 23:00 UTC. This is to have more times when software of the wikis can be updated and make it easier for developers in different parts of the world. [12]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:К1.jpg

When you are making my editions undo, do not make any other edits, please! This category has been choosen by original uploader of this photo -- and was moved by you, as I see. And when you are removing the only one category this photo has ever got, you should add this photo to any "Media needing categories since" Category... Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

The images were categorized as part of Fotoflüge Münsterland. They should not added to the categories. The categorization during upload was wrong. I‘ll put them into "Media needing categories since" next time. I thought a bot will do this work. Hopefully next time the first file mover will do this too (instead from "Fotoflug ..." to "Fotoflug Münsterland ..."). ;-) It would be very kind. Very often any images are categorized in the categories of Fotoflüge Münsterland. It's really boring. :-( I don't know why users do this. --XRay ^talk 16:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

• XRay, maybe you should consider removing redirections from the "Fotoflug" categories... There are six of them: Category:Fotoflug 2014-03-06 (this one is not empty), Category:Fotoflug 2014-11-01, Category:Fotoflug 2014-07-20, Category:Fotoflug 2014-06-07, Category:Fotoflug 2014-04-12, Category:Fotoflug 2014-06-01

German users are using them, when they don't know what to choose -- and we are cleaning redirected categories and moving these files forward to redirection then. You can delete redirections inside and put a {{bad name}} template inside... Good luck! Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Fotoflug 2014-03-06 isn't our category. I've changed the names of our five categories because they were too global. You're right with the redirected categories. I did not set "bad name" because other users may use the old names. You are an administrator. Is it possible to check wether links to our old categories exists? Or can I do this by myself? If there are no links to the categories I'll add the template "bad name". Thanks. --XRay ^talk 16:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't need the answer of my questions. I'll set "bad name". Hopefully this will fix the problem with the disturbing images. --XRay ^talk 17:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-34

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• The ORES review tool is now available on Special:Contributions as a beta feature. It can make it easier to find contributions that are probably damaging the wikis. The ORES review tool is available on Wikidata and Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Dutch, Turkish and Russian Wikipedia. [13]
• The norm and ccnorm functions have been updated to make it easier to write abuse filters. This also affects the TitleBlacklist extension. You don't have to transform "I" and "L" to "1", "O" to "0" and "S" to "5" anymore. [14]
• The old pageview data in the "pagecounts-raw" and "pagecounts-all-sites" files is no longer being updated. You can find the new pageview data here. This happened on August 5. [15]

Problems

• Some big image files could not be thumbnailed. This has now been fixed. [16]
• When you moved a page over a redirect it would delete the redirect without saving it in the logs. This has now been fixed. [17]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 August. It will be on all wikis from 25 August (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 23 August at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Sometimes when you mention another user they don't get a notification. You will be able to get a notification when you successfully sent out a mention to someone or be told if they did not get a notification. This will be opt-in. You can test this on the test wiki. [18][19]
• How you add text after an edit conflict might work in a different way in the future. You can test the prototype. [20]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:2026 in Tecklenburg/Botoptimierung

Hallo, die Zukunftskategorie hab ich hier [21] entfernt, die Kategorie ist jetzt leer. Basierte auf falschen EXIFdaten. vielleicht kannst du deinem Bot noch beibringen sowas nur bis zum aktuellen Datum einzufügen? Holger1959 ([[User talk:Holger1959|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Danke erstmal. Ich sehe zu, dass ich (mein Bot) nicht mehr in die Zukunft schaut. Glücklicherweise war es bisher meines Wissens nach der einzige Fall. --XRay ^talk 03:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-35

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them. This is to save mobile data and make the pages load faster. [22]
• When you edit a table with the visual editor, pressing Tab in the last cell of a row will take you to the first cell in the next row. Pressing Shift and Tab in the first cell of a row will take you to the last cell in the previous row. [23]

Changes this week

• The name of the "int:Savearticle" button will change. The button will say "int:Publishpage" when you create a new page. It will say "int:Publishchanges" when you change an existing page. [24][25]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 31 August. It will be on all wikis from 1 September (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 30 August at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
• You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topic this week is "RfC: image and oldimage tables". The meeting will be on 31 August at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Du hast ja eh gesehen,

dass ich gezwinkert habe, was die falschen Exif-Daten betrifft. Aber ich bin nun um einiges klüger, wie manche Bilder von Dir zustandekommen. Was ich nicht erwartet hätte ist, dass du es mit unterschiedlichen Blendenstufen machst. Ok, hat den Vorteil, dass es nicht so lange dauert (heute bin ich in einem Weinkeller gestanden und die fünf bilder wurden und wurden nicht fertig- weil ich es über die Zeit mache!)

Aber ich kann dir zu diesem Bild nur gratulieren, der Weg ist wirklich sehr gut speziell dann, wenn nur mehr echte Kenner es als ein HDR identifizieren! --Hubertl 18:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:Ping Es wäre vermessen zu behaupten, ich hätte absichtlich mit unterschiedlichen Blenden gearbeitet. Die Kamera war schlicht auf P, einem Modus, in dem ich so gut wie nie arbeite. (Meistens ist es Blendenvorwahl.) Ausnahmsweise hatte ich ihn bei den Wildpferden wegen der schlechten Lichtverhältnisse (was Nebel so alles ausmacht ist schon erstaunlich) genutzt und vergessen zurückzustellen. Das Ergebnis hat mich allerdings überrascht, denn bei f/3.5 hätte ich mit schlechter Schärfentiefe gerechnet. War aber nicht. Die Wirkung ist eher wie bei einer Unschärfemaske und also eher positiv. Tja, und HDR. Photomatix heißt salopp HDR-Software. Die Software kann aber auch mit Exposure Fusion arbeiten. Das ist eher Pseudo-HDR, aber oft natürlicher. Aus den Voreinstellungen von Photomatix suche ich immer die heraus, die am natürlichsten wirkt. Ich mag diese überdrehten HDRIs nicht wirklich. --XRay ^talk 19:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Ich habe auch Photomatix hier am Rechner, seit dem letzten Update von LR verwende ich aber diese "engine" - mit der ich sehr zufrieden bin. Änderungen und tonemapping wie üblich in LR. Mir gefällt die Natürlichkeit der HDR-Ergebnisse (zumindest meistens). Die Originale mache ich im AV-Modus, fast immer mit 5 Bildern, selten, dass ich die Belichtungsreihe als Gesamte manuell verschiebe. Es ändert aber nichts daran, dass sich bei Windbedingungen natürlich echte HDR verbieten, deshalb mein Hinweis auf einen Grauverlaufsfilter mit hartem Rand, wenn eben nur ein Einzelbild möglich ist und der Horizont tatsächlich einigermaßen gerade ist. --Hubertl 22:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-36

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Word-level diffs now work in longer paragraphs. [26]
• Interactive maps now have a frame by default. This is to make them look like other multimedia objects. This affects all Wikivoyages, the Catalan, Hebrew, Macedonian Wikipedias and Meta. [27]
• When you preview the MediaWiki:Captcha-ip-whitelist page it will show a validation output of the listed IP addresses instead of the list of addresses only. This can help you to identify if your whitelist rules will work or not. [28]

Changes this week

• You will be able to use <maplink> on all Wikipedias. It creates a link to a full screen map. [29][30]
• Sometimes when you mention another user they don't get a notification. You will be able to get a notification when you successfully send out a mention to someone or be told if they did not get a notification. This will be opt-in. [31][32]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 September. It will be on all wikis from 8 September (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• The CheckUser extension could work differently in the future. There is a Request for Comments to figure out how. [33]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo XRay!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infoTemplate:@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-37

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• The Wikimedia Commons app for Android can now show nearby places that need photos. [34]
• <maplink> and <mapframe> can now use geodata from Open Street Map if Open Street Map has defined a region and given it an ID in Wikidata. You can use this to draw on the map and add information. [35][36]

Changes this week

• The RevisionSlider will be available as a beta feature on all wikis from 13 September. This will make it easier to navigate between diffs in the page history. [37]
• A new user right will allow most users to change the content model of pages. [38][39]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 September. It will be on all wikis from 15 September (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 13 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• When you search on the Wikimedia wikis in the future you could see results from sister projects in your language. You can read more and discuss how this could work.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-38

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

• Last week's MediaWiki update was rolled back because of bugs. Creating new accounts did not work between 15 September 19:10 UTC and 16 September 12:50 UTC. [40][41]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will hopefully be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 20 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 21 September. It will be on all wikis from 22 September (calendar). This is the version that was meant to go out last week.

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
• You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topic this week is multi-content revisions. The meeting will be on 21 September at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Wikidata will start working on adding support for Wiktionary. The Wikidata development team is now taking one last look at the development plan. [42]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

group of wolfes

tiff, weil dng nicht auf commons unterstützt, und die rawer app der Kamera nur nach tiff exportiert. in wikipedia angezeigt wird ihnehin nie das tiff-original, sondern eine von der wikimedia-software herunterskalierte jpg-version. crop, weil die kamera nur digital und kein optisches zoom hat. ist die auflösung etwa zu gering? persepective issues verstehe ich allerdings überhaupt nicht? da hätte ich gerne eine erklärung. --C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Template:Ping! Da du offensichtlich bei Wikimedia Commons neu bist und ich weiß, dass es anfangs etwas schwieriger ist, antworte ich dann doch mal mit einem längeren Text. (Das ist sonst nicht so mein Ding. Es fehlt dafür einfach die Zeit.) Sieh es mir bitte nach, wenn ich vielleicht Dinge erwähne, die du schon kennst.

Zuerst einmal empfehle ich die Hinweise zu lesen, die am Anfang deiner Diskussionsseite stehen. Wikimedia Commons ist ein multinationales Projekt. Da ist es sehr empfehlenswert, Texte so gut wie möglich zu schreiben. Dazu gehört meiner Meinung nach u. a. auch die Groß-/Kleinschreibung. Das wäre dann sogar für mich leichter leserlich. ;-) Dann ist es empfehlenswert, die Benutzerseite zu pflegen, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Babel-Bausteine. Dann kann jeder sehen, wie gut du welche Sprache sprichst.

Nun zu dem Bild. Bei den Bewertungen fasse ich mich immer kurz, wenn die Kernpunkte genannt sind und es leider keine Aussicht gibt, dies sinnvoll zu beheben. Das setze ich auch direkt ein "Decline". Ansonsten reicht erst einmal ein Hinweis. Ich hoffe, ich darf in direkter Weise etwas zu dem Bild sagen und dir damit auch Tipps geben, denn ich vermute, dass du auch im Fotobereich eher Anfänger bist. Ich zähle mal die Punkte einfach auf:

1. Zuerst das Format. Du hast TIFF genutzt, aber nur in 8 Bit (pro Farbe). Das ist kein nennenswerter Vorteil zu einem Bild im unkomprimierten JPEG-Format. Nur die Dateien werden unnötig groß. Bei den Qualitätsbildern schaut man sich oft das Original an und das lädt natürlich viel länger als ein vergleichbares Bild im TIFF-Format. DNG ist ein Rohdatenformat und daher hier (bei Wikimedia Commons) eher ungeeignet. Das Bild sollte schon fertig entwickelt sein.
2. Dein Bild ist unscharf und zeigt deutliches Rauschen.
3. Die Wasserfontänen sind überbelichtet.
4. Das Bild kippt rechts und links nach außen. (Das sind die perspective issues.)
5. Der Beschnitt (crop) ist rechts und links zu knapp, die Spiegelungen im Wasser sind abgeschnitten.
6. Es wäre besser gewesen, mit der Schärfentiefe zu arbeiten, so dass der Hintergrund unschärfer wird.
7. Die Bestuhlung und die Sonnenschirme stören.
8. An den Dächern im Hintergrund sind grüne chromatische Aberrationen zu sehen.
9. Die Farben des Bilds wirken kalt, ein leichter Blaustich ist zu sehen. Da muss der Weißabgleich korrigiert werden.
10. Gerade bei QI ist es empfehlenswert, den anderen auch die Bilddaten mitzuteilen. Die EXIF-Daten der Aufnahme fehlen allerdings.
11. Die Kategorien deiner Beschreibunsseite müssen besser angepasst werden. Darin ist eine Überkategorisierung zu sehen, aber auch fehlende Kategorien.
12. Bei der Skulptur "Group of Wolves" sollte nach Möglichkeit der Künstler und das Entstehungsjahr angegeben werden.

Es ist durchaus empfehlenswert, die Bild-Richtlinien für die Qualitätsbilder mal durchzulesen. So bekommst du einen Eindruck, welchen Anforderungen ein Qualitätsbild genügen sollte. Es gibt sicherlich Ausnahmen von den Regeln und es rutscht einem mal ein Bild durch, welches dann doch nicht gut genug ist, aber die Bewertung bei QI hilft sehr gut weiter, am eigenen Wissen zu arbeiten und einen Blick für bessere Bilder zu entwickeln.

Ich weiß, es ist zu Anfang schwer. Noch heute steige ich nicht bei allem durch. Bei Fragen kannst du gerne das Forum nutzen oder bei Bedarf auch direkt Fragen. Das Forum hat allerdings den Vorteil, dass mehrere antworten können. Ich hoffe, dir geholfen zu haben und wünsche dir viel Erfolg weiterhin. Bilder bei Wikimedia Commons sind auf jeden Fall eine Bereicherung unseres Kulturguts. --XRay ^talk 05:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Ich versuche mal einige Punkte anzugehen, alle auf einmal ist gerade zu viel. Die Kamera speichert in 24-bit/DNG ab. Eine unkomprimierte JPEG-Version ist mir nicht bekannt, wie mache ich das? Vermutlich hat der Bildsensor ja mehr als 24bit, aber der Hersteller ist nicht mehr aktiv, wie ich an die API kommen könnte, weiss ich bislang nicht. EXIF sind in der DNG-Datei vorhanden (aber DNG hier nicht erlaubt). Da ich ohnehin GPS-Daten zufügen möchte (in der Kamera deaktiviert, da der Akku fest verbaut ist und bei GPS-Nutzung zu schnell leer ist) habe ich versucht, die EXIF-Daten mit PhotoME und ExifToolGui wieder hinzuzufügen, aber in beiden Prgorammen kann ich nicht abspeichern. Benutzerseite kommt, wenn ich mal Zeit dafür habe. Der Beschnitt ist zu knapp, aber die Schirme sollen raus? Ich kann nochmal versuchen, eine andere Aufnahmeposition zu finden, aber ich kann ja nicht anfangen, Wolfsburg umzubauen. Das Kategoriensystem in Commons ist umfangreich und komplex, aber in einem Wiki kann ja jeder mitarbeiten. Bei anderen meiner Dateien hat auch jemand (ein Bot?) Kategorien überarbeitet, auch bei dieser Datei ist das möglich. Muss ich wirklich selber auch noch das Kategoriensystem bis ins letze verstehen, um hier bestehen zu können? Das "Kippen nach außen" verstehe ich nicht? --C.Suthorn ([[User talk:C.Suthorn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Template:Ping! Mittlerweile rätsele ich ja schon, was das für eine Kamera sein kann. Ich würde jetzt ja schon fast - auch im Hinblick auf die Bildqualität - auf eine Smartphone tippen. Bevor ich deine Punkte aufgreife, möchte ich dich bitten, die Links zu nutzen, die ich dir genannt habe. Das erleichtert die Arbeit und ich möchte hier nicht Dinge wiederholen, die an anderer Stelle beschrieben wurden. Deine Kamera schreibt 24-Bit-DNGs, also 8 Bit pro Farbe. Hmm. Ungewöhnlich. Worin mag dann der signifikante Vorteil des DNG-Formats liegen? DNG ist ein Rohformat, es muss (!) noch bearbeitet werden. Das schrieb ich auch schon. Hier bei Wikimedia Commons ist Rohformat nicht sinnvoll, denn die Bilder sollen fertig entwickelt sein. Der Bäcker verkauft ja auch nicht Mehl, Salz und Wasser als Brot, sondern halt das fertige Brot. ;-) Und nicht komprimierte JPEGs sind JPEGs mit der Einstellung 100% (je nach Tool auch mal anders genannt). Ansonsten Dateiformate und deren Vor- und Nachteile zu erläutern würde hier doch zu weit gehen. EXIFs bearbeiten kann man mit dem EXIF-Tool, aber auch gut mit Werkzeugen wie Adobe Lightroom. Das soll keine Werbung sein, sondern ist das Tool, welches ich nutze. Für GPS-Daten kann man aber auch so etwas wie GeoSetter nehmen.
Nun zum noch einmal zu deinem Bild. Ja, die Stühle und Sonnenschirme stören. Aber du hast etwas falsch verstanden. Du sollst nicht Wolfsburg umbauen, aber es gibt Motive, da gibt es immer Störelemente. Manche kann man umgehen, manche nicht. Manche stören heftig, andere weniger. In deinem Fall ein geringeres Problem. Aber man kann in vielen Dingen variieren. Das Bild mit anderem Licht zu einer anderen Jahreszeit wäre vielleicht ohne diese Störelemente möglich - nur mal so als Anregung. Ich kenne auch Motive, die kann man nur an wenigen Tagen im Jahr gut aufnehmen, weil sonst das Licht nicht passt. Ich gehe auch nicht los, wenn Mülltonnen auf der Straße stehen.
Nun zu den Kategorien. Ich zitiere dich mal: "Das Kategoriensystem in Commons ist umfangreich und komplex, aber in einem Wiki kann ja jeder mitarbeiten." Das Kategoriensystem wird von vielen kritisiert und auch ich gehöre eher zu den Kritikern. Aber da wir derzeit nichts Besseres haben, nehmen wir es, da es ohne gar nicht geht. Es gibt viele überflüssige Kategorien, die ich teilweise bei meinen Bildern sogar setze, aber nur per Bot. Manuell würde ich mir die Arbeit nicht machen. Die wichtigsten Regeln sollte man aber einhalten, so das Thema der Überkategorisierung wie bei deinem Bild. Den Link hatte ich schon aufgeführt. Es sollte aber immer der Inhalt und der Ort des Bilds kategorisiert werden. Und es ist ein Wiki, stimmt. Das heißt aber nicht, dass man erwarten darf, dass andere die Daten vervollständigen. Das wird zwar gemacht, aber selbst sollte man schon das leisten, was man kann. Und später dann auch anderen helfen.
Ein Bot hat deine Seite übrigens korrigiert, weil du eine Kategorie angegeben hattest, die nur eine Umleitung ist: Category:Wolf. Der Bot nimmt die Korrektur vor. Und das Kippen nach außen: Die Bild-Richtlinien für QI hattest du gelesen? Schau mal auf die Häuser im Hintergrund. Die Häuser stehen mit Sicherheit senkrecht, also sollten die senkrechten Linien auch senkrecht sein. Bei so einem Bild sollte das schon sein. Klar, es gibt Bilder, bei denen man gezielt stürzende Linien wünscht, aber hier stört es doch. Nur am Rande: Derartige Korrekturen mach ich auch mit Adobe Lightroom, es geht aber auch mit dem Tool ShiftN.
Ein Wort zum Grundverständnis mag noch erlaubt sein. Wikimedia Commons ist eine Gemeinschaft von Freiwilligen. Jeder opfert hier seine Zeit, um das Projekt zu unterstützen. Jeder versucht dies nach besten Möglichkeiten. Zu Anfang mag es etwas schwierig sein, aber man erhält auch Hilfe. So wie ich mir hier Zeit nehme, um dir weiterzuhelfen. Keiner erwartet, dass der andere perfekt alles versteht. Das dauert - glaub's mir - Jahre. Ich habe es bis heute nicht geschafft. Aber der Anfang ist leicht und mit ein wenig gutem Willen und vielleicht der Unterstützung von anderen klappt's ziemlich schnell recht gut. So hoffe ich, dass dir die Dinge bald nicht mehr ganz so kompliziert erscheinen. Ich drücke dir die Daumen.--XRay ^talk 05:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-39

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• If your wiki wants numerical sorting in categories you can request it after a community decision. See how to request it. [43]
• When you edit text and mention a new username they are notified if you add your signature. Before this only happened under certain conditions. [44]
• Users are notified if they are mentioned in a section where you add your own signature even if you edit more than one section. Before, users were not notified if you edited more than one section in one edit. [45]

Problems

• The MediaWiki version that was supposed to come to the wikis two weeks ago was put on hold again because of new problems. The MediaWiki version after it is now on all wikis. [46][47]

Changes this week

• There will be no new MediaWiki version this week. [48]

Meetings

• You can join the next office hour with the Wikidata team. The meeting will be on September 27 at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Abandoned tools on Tool Labs could be taken over by other developers. There is a new discussion on Meta about this. It will be discussed until 12 October and then voted on. [49]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Reinders_2016-sep-24.jpg

Hello XRay, thanks for your hint, I changed the scope, can you check if it is now ok? this is the first time I use the valued images. Best regards --Neozoon ([[User talk:Neozoon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:48, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

I think I finally got it, scope should only be the category and no additional text - changed that Groetjes --Neozoon ([[User talk:Neozoon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-40

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 October. It will be on all wikis from 6 October (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 4 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Tidy will be replaced. Instead the HTML 5 parsing algorithm will be used to clean up bad HTML in wikitext. This would cause problems on a number of wikis. They need to be fixed first. [50]

• <slippymap> will not work on Wikivoyage after 24 October. You should use <mapframe> instead. If you need help to fix this before 24 October you should ask for it as soon as possible. [51]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Re:Pinterest

Hi XRay! Thank you for flagging this! Please accept my sincere apology. I believe that your image has been added to the Wikipedia Pinterest account by mistake. We only intentionally pin PD/CC0 photos and with permission. We have deleted the pin and removed the photo from the Pinterest category. Our social media team will be happy to provide more information about this later today. --Selsharbaty (WMF) ([[User talk:Selsharbaty (WMF)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Social media and copyright tasks are not easy to handle. --XRay ^talk 15:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-41

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• You can show Special:RecentChanges on a page by using {{Special:RecentChanges}}. You can now use tag filters by using {{Special:RecentChanges/tagfilter=tagname}}. [52]
• The notification badge is coloured if you have notifications. When you check the notification the badge will now turn grey on all wikis instead of just the local one. [53]
• Colours used in the Wikimedia wikis' main interface changed slightly. This is to make them easier to see for readers and editors with reduced eyesight. [54]

Changes this week

• Hidden HTML comments will be more visible when you edit with the visual editor. <!-- You write hidden HTML comments like this. --> [55]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 October. It will be on all wikis from 13 October (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 11 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
• You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topics this week is CREDITS files. The meeting will be on 12 October at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Language converter syntax will soon no longer work inside external links. Wikitext like http://-{zh-cn:foo.com; zh-hk:bar.com; zh-tw:baz.com}- must be replaced. You will have to write -{zh-cn: http://foo.com ; zh-hk: http://bar.com ; zh-tw:http://baz.com }- instead. This only affects languages with Language Converter enabled. Examples of such languages are Chinese and Serbian. [56]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Bildausschnitt erzeugen

Hallo, Dietmar, es wäre schön, wenn Du zu File:Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 2.jpg eine ausgeschnittene Version erzeugen könntest, die in Vorschaubildern so ähnlich aussieht wie Dein anderes Bild zur Thematik, File:Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 4.jpg. Beide will ich dann in de:Küchenlatein einbauen (und damit dort andere ersetzen). — Speravir_[[User talk:Speravir|[[:ucfirst:int:Talkpagelinktext]]]] – 00:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Ping Kein Problem, schon passiert: File:Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 4692 (crop).jpg. Bei der Gelegenheit habe ich auch meine eigene ID angepasst, aber das ist sicherlich für dich weniger spannend. --XRay ^talk 05:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Danke! Ich hab sie schon eingearbeitet, siehe in de:Küchenlatein relativ weit unten im Abschnitt Wirtschaftsbereich. — Speravir_[[User talk:Speravir|[[:ucfirst:int:Talkpagelinktext]]]] – 17:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Bildausschnitt erzeugen

Hallo, Dietmar, es wäre schön, wenn Du zu File:Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 2.jpg eine ausgeschnittene Version erzeugen könntest, die in Vorschaubildern so ähnlich aussieht wie Dein anderes Bild zur Thematik, File:Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 4.jpg. Beide will ich dann in de:Küchenlatein einbauen (und damit dort andere ersetzen). — Speravir_[[User talk:Speravir|[[:ucfirst:int:Talkpagelinktext]]]] – 00:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Ping Kein Problem, schon passiert: File:Berlin, Botanischer Garten -- 2013 -- 4692 (crop).jpg. Bei der Gelegenheit habe ich auch meine eigene ID angepasst, aber das ist sicherlich für dich weniger spannend. --XRay ^talk 05:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Danke! Ich hab sie schon eingearbeitet, siehe in de:Küchenlatein relativ weit unten im Abschnitt Wirtschaftsbereich. — Speravir_[[User talk:Speravir|[[:ucfirst:int:Talkpagelinktext]]]] – 17:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-42

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• There is a new newsletter from the Collaboration team at the Wikimedia Foundation. It will have more details about for example Flow and notifications. You can read the first issue.

Problems

• Some users got a warning about Wikipedia's security certificate last week. This was because of a problem GlobalSign had. This has now been fixed. Only a small number of users got the warning. [57]
• Editors couldn't edit semi-protected pages in the Wikipedia app for Android. This has now been fixed in the beta version. [58]

Changes this week

• There will be no new MediaWiki version this week. [59]

Future changes

• The Editing Department are working on a new wikitext editor. It will have tools that are in the visual editor but not in the wikitext editor today. You can read more about this. This is an early plan and things can change. The old wikitext editor will still exist.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-43

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

• The abuse filters had a problem and caught too many edits. This has now been fixed. [60]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 25. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from October 26. It will be on all wikis from October 27 (calendar).
• The "Search" text in the search box will show the name of the project. For example, on Wikipedia it will say "Search Wikipedia". [61]
• About a dozen wikis now have numerical sorting in categories. If your wiki wants numerical sorting in categories you can ask for it. [62]
• Some wikis that want numerical sorting in categories can also ask to use UCA to sort categories. The biggest difference is that characters with diacritics will be sorted together. For example, for most languages Ä will be sorted with A instead of at the end of the alphabet. This is not true for languages that have Ä as a character in their alphabet. Wikis that already use UCA are listed on Meta. Languages that can use UCA are listed on MediaWiki.org. You can test it.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Wieder einmal ...

... herzliche Glückwünsche zu deinem überragenden Abschneiden bei WLM. Diesmal ist dir, wie es scheint, der ganz große Wurf gelungen, auch wenn es kein heimisches Motiv war, das ganz vorne gelandet ist! Auch wenn die Ergebnisse noch gegengecheckt werden, freue ich mich, der erste Gratulant zu sein! --Watzmann ^Talk 18:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Nicht schlecht, ganz oben zu enden unten fast 40.000 Kandidaten ist eine Leistung! Gratulation! Poco² 19:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Ich bin völlig überrascht. Damit hatte ich gar nicht gerechnet. --XRay ^talk 20:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Der Gratulantenregie schließe ich mich an! Das sind hervorragende Bilder aus der Speicherstadt und dann auch noch so gut und häufig unter den WLM Top 100 platziert. Respekt! Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank auch dir, Dirtsc. Die Fototour nach Hamburg war schon toll. Tolle Rahmenbedingungen am Samstag. Sonntags hat's dann leider geregnet. Wir waren zu Fuß mit der ganzen Ausrüstung unterwegs. Da fielen spannende Ziele außerhalb der bekannten Objekte aus. Aber das kann ja später noch mal passieren. Ihr habt ja doch sehr viele tolle Fotoziele in und um Hamburg. Ideen für ein Wochenendziel unserer kleinen Fotogruppe für 2017 - wir versuchen, eine Tour pro Jahr zu machen - gibt es auch schon. --XRay ^talk 05:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Das hört sich richtig toll und nach einer sehr schönen Aktion an. Wenn ihr los fahrt und in Hamburg Motive sucht, die noch nicht "totfotografiert" sind (also zumindest mir als Hamburger kommen die Motive "Wasserschloss", "Rathaus" und "Speicherstadt bei Dämmerung" zu den Ohren wieder raus... ;-) , was man dann sicher auch an meiner persönlichen Motivauswahl für WLM merkt.) melde Dich ruhig bei mir oder bei Ajepbah. Wir hätten da bestimmt Vorschläge. Spontan fällt mir z.B. der alte Kern von Blankenese ein, die Villenviertel westlich der Außenalster oder auch die Vier- und Marschlande. Von mir aus könnten wir das je nach Termin auch gerne mit einem persönlichen Treffen kombinieren. Viele Grüße --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Gerne behalte ich euer Angebot im Hinterkopf. Ich komme sicherlich wieder nach Hamburg. Das mit der Motivwahl ist immer so eine Sache. Oft kann man Karl Valentins Spruch Es ist schon alles gesagt, nur noch nicht von allen. durchaus auf's Fotografieren ummünzen. Manchmal ist man allerdings auch verwundert, dass Bilder einzelner Motive in Massen durch die sozialen Medien geistern, aber bei Wikimedia Commons dazu kaum welche zu finden sind. Und seltenere Ansichten schaffen es anscheinend auch bei der Vorjury von WLM nur selten. Zumindest fand ich in der Auswahl fast keine, obwohl sie mir bei den eingereichten Bildern aufgefallen waren. --XRay ^talk 07:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

WLM

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum ersten Platz! Ein feines Bild und ein verdienter Sieg. Ich hoffe, wir sehen uns zur Preisverleihung? --Code ([[User talk:Code|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Danke. :-) Den Glückwunsch kann ich zurückgeben. Du hast ja auch ein tolles Bild platziert. Und ja, ich komme am 25. November nach Berlin. Ich werde morgens fahren, dann habe ich am Nachmittag noch die Chance auf eine kleine Fototour. Und vielleicht auch am Samstagvormittag noch. --XRay ^talk 12:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Danke Dir. Na dann hoffe ich mal, dass das Wetter am 25. November gut sein wird! Bis dahin, viele Grüße! --Code ([[User talk:Code|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Template:WLM 2016 Danke

Hallo, hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.

Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Gern kannst Du Dich hier auch weiterhin beteiligen! Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichten Deine obigen tollen Fotos Plätze unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.

Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.

Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!

i. A. --Nicola ([[User talk:Nicola|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-44

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Now you can include Commons video films with subtitles in your wiki language. Before you could see translated videos on file page at Commons only. [63]
• Search now has an updated preference tab to configure the search completion suggester. [64]
• The visual editor is now available on all wikis using only one language script. [65]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 1^st. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from November 2^nd. It will be on all wikis from November 3^rd (calendar).
• Now you can use autocomplete for page names in "int:Templatesandbox-editform-legend" field when editing templates. [66]
• Special:NewPages can now be filtered by page size. [67]

Future changes

• New MediaWiki deployments will be now based on MediaWiki 1.29. [68]

Miscellaneous

• The Wikimedia Foundation's Technical Collaboration Guideline is available for community review. Any feedback welcome, in any language.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-45

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Victoria Coleman is the new Chief technology officer for the Wikimedia Foundation. [69]
• First release candidate for MediaWiki 1.28 is now available. [70]
• .gitreview for MediaWiki branches and extensions switched from targeting a specific branch to using track=1. [71]
• Section numbers in Table of Contents boxes will use grey to improve readability. [72]

Changes this week

• The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey begins on 7 November.
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 8th. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from November 9th. It will be on all wikis from November 10th (calendar).
• Special:ActiveUsers will allow users groups selection. [73]

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 8 November 2016 at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
• You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topics this week are Image Thumbnail API and allow SVG files uploaded on MediaWiki to have XHTML namespaces. The meeting will be on 9 November at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• RevisionSlider will be enabled by default on all beta wikis, on testwiki, testwiki2, mediawikiwiki and de.wikipedia.org. [74][75][76]
• Upcoming holidays will impact deployments. The schedule has been published.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Gewinnerbild WLM 2016

Moin XRay,

Ich war einer der Juroren bei WLM-DE. Per Wiki-Mail wurde ich heute darauf hingewiesen, das dein Siegerbild einen Grauschleier hat. Stimmt. Mein Nikon "af-s-dx-nikkor-16-80mm-f-2-8-4e-ed-vr" macht den gleichen Mist.

Ich bin nur ein interessierter Laie in der Fotografie, hab diese Mail als Juror aber trotzdem ernst genommen. Unglaublich, mit der Automatik von Gimp gab es diese Version. Dort hab ich bewusst keine Daten eingetragen, damit das Bild irgendwann gelöscht wird.

Nich böse sein über das Gemecker...

Gruss Nightflyer

Danke für den Hinweis. Ein Grauschleier ist sicherlich eher relativ. Das mag unterschiedliche Ursachen haben, auch natürliche. Ich schaue mal, ob ich da noch ein wenig optimiere. --XRay ^talk 05:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Ping Jetzt habe ich die beiden Bilder mal direkt verglichen. Danke für deinen Tipp und die Mühe, mir eine Alternative zu zeigen. Ich sehe auch das Problem. Vermutlich habe ich schlicht ein paar Regler zu weit gezogen. Bis zum Wochenende ist es korrigiert. --XRay ^talk 06:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Ping Hallo! Das Bild habe ich nun angepasst. Es hat leider ein paar Versuche gekostet, weil es ja doch in unterschiedlichen Umgebungen leicht unterschiedlich dargestellt wird. Bist du so nett und schaust noch einmal darauf. Aus meiner Sicht sieht nichts mehr nach Grauschleier aus. Danke! --XRay ^talk 16:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Gefällt mir als Laie mit unkalibriertem Monitor besser (Die Kal-Geräte bei WMDE sind unterwegs bzw nicht auffindbar, evtl. werden neue beschafft, wurde mir zugemailt). Dann drück ich dir mal die Daumen für den internationalen Wettbewerb. Wenn du bei der Preisverleihung in Berlin bist, sehen wir uns dort :-) Gruss --Nightflyer ([[User talk:Nightflyer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Danke! Dann werden wir uns in Berlin treffen. Die Fahrkarte hab' ich schon. :-) --XRay ^talk 20:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-46

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• When you edit with the visual editor you can use meta + shift + k to add a reference. The meta key is often the control key or command key. [77]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from November 15. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from November 16. It will be on all wikis from November 17 (calendar).
• In Special:Preferences you can choose which language menus and buttons will be in. If there is no translation for that language, MediaWiki has a list of fallback languages. A fallback language is a language many will understand better than English. MediaWiki will now use English when there is no Ukrainian translation. [78]

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 15 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Magic links might not work in the future. [79]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

CA

Following up on your QIC question from a few days ago. I do use Lightroom, and I like when the sliders work to get rid of CA, but I find that most of the time when there are a lot of details, the sliders aren't sufficient, and I have to use one or more brushes/clones in Photoshop. I'm still fairly new to it all, though. The big issue in this most recent case is I felt like I was chopping away so many edges, looking for the problem, that it seemed like I started to do more harm than good. :/ — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

You're right, sometimes it isn't an easy task. Remove CAs on one side, they appear at another side. Sometimes parts of the sky were removed. There are still images I'll start from the beginning. --XRay ^talk 07:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-47

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Administrators, bureaucrats, oversighters and checkusers can now use two-factor authentication. This makes their Wikimedia accounts more secure. This can be turned on in Special:Preferences. There are discussions on how to best turn it on for everyone. [80]
• You can now search for file properties. For example you can search for media type, how big a file is or what resolution it has. [81]
• The latest Collaboration team products newsletter has been published. It has more details about their work than Tech News has.

Problems

• A hacker group is hacking Wikimedia accounts. They can probably do this because users have the same passwords on Wikimedia wikis as on other sites. Please have a password you use only on the Wikimedia wikis and nowhere else. This is especially important for administrators, bureaucrats, oversighters and checkusers. These users can also turn on two-factor authentication. [82]

Changes this week

• There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
• RevisionSlider will be a default feature on German, Arabic and Hebrew Wikipedia. This will happen on 22 November. It will come to other wikis later. [83][84][85]

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 22 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• It will be possible to do cross-wiki search. The developers who work on this are looking for communities that want to test this. [86]
• Hovercards will leave the beta stage. The Wikimedia Foundation Reading Web team wants communities to set Hovercards as a default option for readers who are not logged in. Communities that are interested can say so on the Hovercards talk page. [87]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-48

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes this week

• When someone tries to log in to a blocked account they will be blocked by a cookie. This means their browser will be blocked even if they change their IP address. This makes it more difficult for returning vandals. [88]
• When you use Content Translation to adapt a template to a new translation it will work differently. You can adapt big templates such as infoboxes. Translators will have control over the template parameters. A first version of this is released this week. It is possible it will not work correctly with all templates. There will be more updates for this soon. [89]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 November. It will be on all wikis from 1 December (calendar).
• Gadgets will have a new option called "hidden". This means you can register gadgets that can't be turned on or off from the preferences page. Hiding gadgets was already possible by using [rights=hidden]. You should now use [hidden] instead. [rights=hidden] in old gadgets should be changed to [hidden]. [90][91]

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 29 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Tool Labs could get two new policies. One would be to be able to adopt tools without an active developer. The other would be a right to fork. There is a request for comment on Meta.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-49

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• You can choose to see users from specific user groups in Special:ActiveUsers. [92]
• Everyone can now see Special:UserRights. Previously only those who could change user rights could. Other users got an error message. [93]
• ORES can now show how likely an edit is to be damaging to the wiki with different colours. This only works for languages that have trained ORES to recognize damaging edits. [94]

Changes this week

• You will now see categories with 0 pages in Special:Categories. Previously you did not see empty categories there. [95]
• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 December. It will be on all wikis from 8 December (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 December at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey will decide what the Community Tech team will work on next year. You vote for wishes on the survey page until 12 December. You can see what has happened to last year's wishes on the 2015 results page.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Lokalzeit Münsterland 6. Dezember 2016

HiHo, ich hab Dein Bild gesehen (dieses hier, oder? File:Dülmen, Wiese am Strandbadweg -- 2016 -- 5677-83.jpg),in der Lokalzeit von min27.58sec bis min28.12sec. (http://www1.wdr.de/mediathek/video/sendungen/lokalzeit-muensterland/video-lokalzeit-muensterland-994.html) online bis 13.12. FYI falls Du selber die Sendung nicht gesehen hast.... VG --Inetdeswerdisagedürfe ([[User talk:Inetdeswerdisagedürfe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Das von Dir genannte müsste es tatsächlich sein, stimmt. Viele meiner Bilder sind sowieso hier bei Wikimedia Commons. Die Sendung habe ich leider nicht live, aber in der Mediathek gesehen. --XRay ^talk 16:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-50

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Users who have Yahoo email addresses could not use Special:EmailUser to send emails. This has now been fixed. Emails will now come from a @wikimedia.org address. Users who get an email from you will still reply to your email address and be able to see it. [96]
• You can now see how many categories and pages there are in the categories in Special:TrackingCategories. This is to help you find pages that could need attention. [97]
• Markup colours for reviewed and pending revisions in the page history and recent changes and logs now match Wikimedia standard colours. The "You have a new message on your talk page" notification will have a slightly different colour. [98]

Problems

• Because of work on cross-wiki watchlists global renaming is not working. The plan is to turn it on again on 16 December. Global renaming was turned off for a while in late November and early December as well. [99]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 December. It will be on all wikis from 15 December (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on December 13 at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-51

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News

• Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 9 January 2017.
• The writers of the technical newsletter are asking for your opinion. Did you get the information you wanted this year? Did we miss important technical news in 2016? What kind of information was too late? Please tell us! You can write in your language. Thank you!

Recent changes

• Administrators and translation administrators can now use Special:PageLanguage on wikis with the Translate extension. This means you can say what language a page is in. The Translate extension will use that language as the source language when you translate. Previously this was always the wiki's default language. This was usually English. [100]
• Wikis connected to Wikidata can now use the parser function {{#statements: }} to get formatted data. You can also use {{#property: }} to get raw data. You can see the difference between the two statements. There are also similar new functions in Lua. [101]

Problems

• Some abuse filters for uploaded files have not worked as they should. We don't know exactly which filters didn't work yet. This means some files that filters should have prevented from being uploaded were uploaded to the wikis. MediaWiki.org and Testwiki have been affected since 13 October. Commons and Meta have been affected since 17 October. Other wikis have been affected since 17 November. [102]

Changes this week

• There is no new MediaWiki version this week. There will be no new MediaWiki version next week either.

Meetings

• The next meeting with the VisualEditor team will be on 3 January at 20:00 (UTC). During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. See how to join.

Future changes

• The 2016 Community Wishlist Survey is done. It decides what the Community Tech team will work on during 2017. You can see the results.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Some holiday joy

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! Template:Smiley --cart-Talk 15:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! My wishes for a happy new year. Hopefully you'd nice christmas days. You having a interesting tradition. I think it's similar everywhere. In Germany it's for example looking [for One] at New Year's Eve. --XRay ^talk 07:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for your wishes. Hopefully you had nice christmas days. My wishes for a happy new your to you! And always good light to take photographs! --XRay ^talk 07:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

POTD move?

Hi, I was thinking of nominating this polar bear photo for POTD on 5 june 2017 since it is the World Environment Day. Right now that date is represented by your photo. Would you consider moving that to another date or is there some special occasion connecting that pic with that date? Best, cart-Talk 15:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

It's not a special date for my photograph. You can move it to any other date.--XRay ^talk 17:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, that is very gracious of you! :) I'll do it after some dinner so I don't screw it up. cart-Talk 19:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

No problem. I like the photo with the bears. (Sorry, I moved the file again. I've forgotten the reason for this date. But World Environment Day is a better reason. It is now POD at 2018, May 21th. BTW: The reason is a special german date: de:Deutscher Mühlentag. I'll reuse your date (2017-07-07) choosen with my next FP - if it's free.) --XRay ^talk 05:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	int:wikilove-barnstar-kindness-title
	Thank You for being kind enough to let me use your day at Potd for the World Environment Day. Template:Smiley Your picture is now on 7 July 2017, about a month later. Hopefully I managed to remember to move and fix everything but could you check it anyway. Again, thanks! cart-Talk 22:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Landesstraßen in North Rhine-Westphalia

Vielleicht sollte man gleich alle Landesstraßen mit Klammer mit dem Bundesland anlegen. Was denkst du? Verschieben? --Atamari ([[User talk:Atamari|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Das mit dem Bundesland fiel mir dann auch auf. Verschieben ist sicherlich sinnvoll. Ohne Bundesland bringt es nichts. Ich kann beim Verschieben gerne mithelfen, aber leider nicht in den nächsten Tagen. --XRay ^talk 20:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Normalerweise agieren wir so: zunächst ein Klammerloses Lemma/Klammerlose Kategorie. Ich denke hier sollte man mittelfristig direkt den Klammerzusatz verwenden - wer weis wann eine andere Landesstraße aus einem anderen Bundesland angelegt wird (dann gibt es keine Kollision). Ich mache das mal jetzt mit NRW. --Atamari ([[User talk:Atamari|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Genau das war mein Problem. Ich hatte ein Bild einer Straße zugeordnet und musste dann feststellen, dass diese zwar dieselbe Nummer trägt, aber in einem anderen Bundesland liegt. Und somit fand ich es sinnvoll, gerade bei Landesstraßen auch das Land zu ergänzen. Es könnte auch für andere sonst irritierend sein. Zudem wirkt die Kategorie Category:Landesstraße etwas unsortiert. --XRay ^talk 06:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)