User talk:Tomer T/Archive 1

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page.

Welcome to the Commons, Tomer T/Archive 1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:DK Fanoe Windmill01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DK Fanoe Windmill01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 06:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow, I didn't know that it had been nominated. Thanks, it's really nice to have such praise from the community for one of my photos. Cnyborg 20:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gitmo_Aerial.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Gitmo_Aerial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tomer T 13:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Orange juice 1 edit1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Orange juice 1 edit1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 20:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Israeli cinema icon

Hi Tomer. Sorry for the delayed reply. The icon Image:Israelfilm.png was created sometime ago. I hope it works out for you. Wisekwai 12:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Additionally, there's a tonne of similar flag/film icon images in Category:Film icons. Wisekwai 12:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer, I will use that file. Tomer T 04:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token 04b207fdbc8f4eb4cf39fddecb1531f3

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Talkback

	Hello, Tomer T. You have new messages at Jovianeye's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stack of firewood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Jovianeye 04:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
It misses the usual template with description, isn't that a problem? Mvg, Basvb 09:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
I fixed that. --Tomer T 10:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nimrod by Itzhak Danziger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maquereau fumé Luc Viatour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically nearly flawless --ElHeineken 19:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benjamingenocchio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. very nice --Schlaier 15:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Peres House for Peace in Jaffa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right front corner is not tilted at all. The darker parts of the front are a little bit too noisy. But in my opinion this is a QI. I like it. --Elektroschreiber 20:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liberty arrabe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit dusty feeling here. Yet it is a quality image ĩn my opinion. --Ximonic 15:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phasia hemiptera top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beau travail/Good work. --Jamain 08:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008Schönebach16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some minor CA, but overall great picture. --King of Hearts 19:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:MayerWeb.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:MayerWeb.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MayerWeb.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Newcollege_wall-hall-chapel_oxondude.jpg

File:Newcollege_wall-hall-chapel_oxondude.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Duncankennedy.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Duncankennedy.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Duncankennedy.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massada Tram Car by David Shankbone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 11:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris - Eiffelturm und Marsfeld2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments not everything is sharp but composition is nice --Mbdortmund 00:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremlevskaya Naberezhnaja Moscow.hires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dranse de Morzine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Wehranlage Grosshesselohe XL.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wehranlage Grosshesselohe XL.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Matt Reis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Support - I support this as most representative, imo.--MrPanyGoff 17:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: +0
2. Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: +0
3. Matt Reis.jpg: +2 
=>
File:Matt Reis goal kick.jpg: Declined.
File:Matt Reis pregame Revs vs FC Dallas.jpg: Declined.
File:Matt Reis.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 20:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shimon Peres.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Support More symbolic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Support - Actually I also think this is the best but at first I try to avoid some wrong interpretation of this symbolic composition.--MrPanyGoff 16:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: +2
2. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: +0
3. Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: +0 
4. Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: +0
5. Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Shimon Peres, Yasser Arafat - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2001.jpg: Promoted.
File:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2005 (346655258).jpg: Declined.
File:Shimon peres wjc 90126.jpg: Declined.
File:Shimon Peres by David Shankbone.jpg: Declined.
File:Shimon Peres - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2009.jpg: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 21:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Israel Philharmonic Orchestra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ehud Barak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Janis Ian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Support - It is too reddish but I think it is better.--MrPanyGoff 20:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Janis Ian 1.jpg: +0
2. Janis Ian 2.jpg: +1
=>
File:Janis Ian 1.jpg: Declined.
File:Janis Ian 2.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 20:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Augustin Church Paris .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 09:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco calatrava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 09:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinidad street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The guy picking his nose notwithstanding, I like the effect of this picture and it is technically sound. --Saffron Blaze 01:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:CarmelTunnels.Neve Shaanan Intercange.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CarmelTunnels.Neve Shaanan Intercange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot. Makes an Enlgish roundabout seem simple. --Saffron Blaze 10:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maid of the Mist - pot-o-gold.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me--Jebulon 21:50, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument valley roche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really good. --King of Hearts 12:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tyler Labine 2011 Shankbone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Captivating and informative. --Saffron Blaze 20:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horseshoe Falls from helicopter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very illustative of one of the natural wonders. --Saffron Blaze 17:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Hungarian names

Hungarian names invariably use the "Eastern name order", or family name followed by given name, except in foreign language text. Hungary is the only European and Western country to do so. [1] [2] In English texts are Hungarian names written in "Western order". --Dezidor (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Now I know :) --Tomer T (talk) 11:29, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Childrens Museum of Indianapolis - Sande helmet mask.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de Montreuil, mascaron-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harmony Gumery Palais Garnier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some overexposure, but no big deal. --Mattbuck 04:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ternate City, Indonesia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Featured Image candidate Elisabethkirche Schneeberg

Dear colleague,

Thank you very much for your constructive comment related to my picture Elisabethkirche Schneeberg.jpg. I have re-worked the file in order to reduce the noise. I would greatly appreciate if you could give your advice if you see the necessity for further improvements. In case the new version is now in accordance with your criteria for a Featured Image, I would be glad if you could revise your vote accordingly. Many thanks and kind regards, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

There is still some noise. Take a close-up look on the door area. Tomer T (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemon Orchard in the Galilee by David Shankbone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful landscape, sharpness acceptable. --King of Hearts 20:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Greek police

Hello TomerT

Thanks for review and for message.

I understand what you mean, even if I disagree a bit but no matter.

As I'm no more on Symi island (very near from Turkey in the Aegean sea) now, but in Paris (France), it should be difficult to try another shot !

But I'm careful enough: I've tooken those days another picture with only the logo, alone !!

I did'nt upload it yet on "Commons", because I've to learn about copyright in Greece.

Anyway, thanks for feedback.--Jebulon (talk) 14:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Tomer T (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Synagogue od Sibiu

Please, write also the hebrew text. Cezarika1 (talk) 10:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

I've added it. By the way, what you use the image for? Tomer T (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

QI

For the photo of the Mayor of Pereslavl Andrey Okhapkin you said, some lighting problems. Could you please tell me about those problems? Having a RAW file, I may check and change; or maybe your advice helps me to make better photos in future. Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

If you'll take a close-up look on the hair, you'll see it is too bright. Also, parts of the face are too bright as well and have a somewhat unnatural color (like the ears or the nose). --Tomer T (talk) 11:47, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. The man is a bit gray-haired; also, the photo is made on a bright sunny day. Everything white went extremely white :-). That's also about the nose. The ear looks to be fixed, if you explain the point where it has to.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat - Luang Prabang 20110415-40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 18:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Károly Keleti, socha (Béla Tóth, 2008), 2011 Budapešť 0272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Armchair Louis XVI in QIC

Hello TomerT

I've upload a new version. Is it better now ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purdys Wharf v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No distorsion, a good quality. --Fandecaisses 21:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CableCarToMasada.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Fandecaisses 13:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magshimim Pomegranate's Orchard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but it would be better to go over the barbed wire... --Fandecaisses 13:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yamaha Rhino in Yyteri 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Looks like those photos in advertising brochures. --High Contrast 16:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Most valued reviews

Hi, it would be nice if you take up a position on these two Valued Reviews - Beyt ha-Tefutsoth and Auditorio de Tenerife. Greetings.--MrPanyGoff 08:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I took :) Tomer T (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katedrála Krista Spasitele, Šuši.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support The latest version is QI for me. --Jovianeye 01:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa Louise Odier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 16:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beit Hatfutsot Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Comment I'm thinking about the spelling of the name. You suggest one. En:wikipedia uses Beth Hatefutsoth. De:wikipedia uses Beit Hatefutsot. Official web site is Beit Hatfutsot. So, which one?--MrPanyGoff 19:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- "Ha" is "the" in Hebrew. I don't think there is any formal decision of how to write it in English. The first part of the name (Beth/Beit) can be written either way I think, but "Beit" is more accurate. And actually, you made a good point, because the name of the category here in Commons (with which I spelled the scope) is wrong, as well as the English article and I think also the German one (I'm not really sure about the German pronunciation). The correct spelling would be Beit Hatfutsot (like the official website of the museum suggests). Regards, Tomer T (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
  - Thanks for clarification. The scope has to link some category but doesn't has to be named word for word after it. So I think that the scope name here should be changed to Beit Hatfutsot Museum as in the official web site. --MrPanyGoff 08:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
~~Support~~ Tomer T (talk) 09:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

:) You are a nominator here the adjustment of the scope is enough.--MrPanyGoff 21:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Support - I find this photo most representative of the subject, for now, in commons.--MrPanyGoff 21:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. PikiWiki Israel 6869 museum of the diaspora.jpg: +1
2. Beth Hatefutsoth3.JPG: +0 
3. PikiWiki Israel 6951 museum of the diaspora.jpg: +0 
=>
File:PikiWiki Israel 6869 museum of the diaspora.jpg: Promoted.
File:Beth Hatefutsoth3.JPG: Declined.
File:PikiWiki Israel 6951 museum of the diaspora.jpg: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 10:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Frikase.jpg

File:Frikase.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 18:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I didn't want to be uploaded. I don't know why it was. I'll be happy if you'll delete it. Tomer T (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Freudian upload? ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marseille Panier Drying Laundry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Great color, and I think could be QI if distracting detail on right cropped out. Jonathunder 21:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Done. Tomer T 12:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Nice image. Jonathunder 16:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Andrea Chénier, Bregenz 01.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrea Chénier, Bregenz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schönebach 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

File:IDF soldier put on tefillin.jpg

לתומר: תפסתי יוזמה ופניתי למחבר הספר, עשאל לובוצקי (דרך מכר משותף). הוא אמר שלמיטב זכרונו הוא קיבל את התמונה מההוצאה לשימוש חופשי. לבקשתי אם הוא מוכן לבדוק את זה ואם יש לו תיעוד לכך הוא שלח לי את המייל הבא מאביו ואמר שהוא מאשר לויקיפדיה להשתמש בתמונה.

The answer is yes, you can use it, and free of all charges. Please mention clearly the name of the photographer : Yoav LEMMER, and the name of the company : AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE. I wish all the best to your son, good health mainly, and the best of luck. All the best. Patrick. Asimaoz (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

מחקתי את פרטי יצירת הקשר, שכן אלו יכולים להביא לתוצאות ששולח התמונה לא רצה בהם. תודה על תפיסת היוזמה, אנא שלח את האימייל למערכת ה-OTRS.

ראה he:ויקיפדיה:OTRS. Tomer T (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Immaculate Conception, by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Immaculate Conception, by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lac du Milieu de Bastan Hautes Pyrénées 02 BLS.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lac du Milieu de Bastan Hautes Pyrénées 02 BLS.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

FP

Dear Tomer, please provide a better version of the image that you've recently candidated as feature. Problem is in its noise, it have to be cleaned up. If you don't recognize how to do this, just give me a permission and I'll quickly provide a better, alternative version of that candidated picture or ask an other user to do that. Thank you, Alex^discussion 21:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know how to do it. Can you? Tomer T (talk) 21:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julius II portrait by Raffaello Sanzio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Eye orbit anatomy anterior2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eye orbit anatomy anterior2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hagia-Sophia-Laengsschnitt.jpg 2

This is not the correct way of reopening of a closed FPC, it's better if someone nominate it again. ■ MMXX ^talk 16:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I responded in the nomination page. Tomer T (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Damselfly 03 (MK).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Damselfly 03 (MK).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Pontederia cordata 4 PP.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pontederia cordata 4 PP.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Blois

Hi. Can you do these corrections? I don't have a clue how to do it. Tomer T (d) 17:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

I can try to remove the cloned guys. About the distortion, I think you would have to cut too much of the picture to get it right. -Gzzz (talk) 20:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. About the distortion, I saw you approached to Diliff. I hope he can fix it (although it is quite unnoticeable). Tomer T (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Saskatchewan Farm Elevator.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saskatchewan Farm Elevator.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

File:SNCB EMU624 R01.jpg

Thank you very much for nominating my picture of the Belgian EMU #624 as FPC ! Kind regards, MJJR.

Gladly :) Tomer T (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

"Not Commons' best work"

I mean, you should have a further rationale why you immediately vote to oppose here; otherwise you would have voted similarly at least in that candidature. - A.Savin 19:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

To your request, I further explained my point of view. Regrading the curch's photo: I still think it's appealing enough and pretty enough for a FP. Tomer T (talk) 00:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

I had already much more impressive church pics to candidate. Maybe someone should admit finally that meanwhile certain clique vote(r)s mostly decide about a candidature. Very poor, that project. - A.Savin 05:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm quite amazed at these accusations. I don't see myself as a notable figure here at commons. Besides FP, which I'm dealing with also in Hebrew and English Wikipedia, I don't do much here. I know only one user personally, with which I spoke for a minute or so in Wikimania. The usernames of the active users at FPC are familiar to me, but I don't yet stand on the differences between them, and certainly don't know what you're talking about when mentioning any "cliques". I judge every picture discussed based only on the criteria, and based on aesthetic and encyclopedic aspects.

You asked me to give a more extensive & detailed review, and I did. I think I delivered it quite clearly, and made my point. After a review as extensive as I gave, I don't expect anyone to doubt my movites. You can disagree with me, and tell me why you don't accept my arguments, but it's a long way from that to just accuse me of being a part of a "clique" and attribute my motives to that.

About what you said - as you probably know, beauty and impressiveness are not absolute. They depend on the viewer's perspective. You should have realized that yourself and attribute our disagreements to that, and shouldn't have attributed it to mysterious "cliques" motives. Also, I don't know what you're talking about when you just say, out of the blue, that you "had already much more impressive church pics to candidate".

Maybe you should assume good faith. Tomer T (talk) 11:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Giraffa camelopardalis head (Profil).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Giraffa camelopardalis head (Profil).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Your Chantilly nomination

Hello TomerT,

i just thank you very much for your nomination of my picture of Château de Chantilly in FPC page.

As all surprises, it was unexpected!

I hope other users (minimum 7...) will agree with your choice I'm proud of.

Greetings from Paris, and Shalom to you.--Jebulon (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

You're very welcome! Thank you for the wonderful picture! Greetings from Tel Aviv :) Tomer T (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow hard hat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 12:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Château Chantilly 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château Chantilly 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_9.2C_2011

Hello Tomer T,
I have corrected the QI candidate. --Jovian Eye _storm 11:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Storfjorden autumn, 2009 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Storfjorden autumn, 2009 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Berlin reichstag west panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin reichstag west panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tarvurvur.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarvurvur.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont Blanc 2011.jpg

Imo I'm allowed to FPX the candidate, as the template only says "please", and does not forbid me to use the template. If you contest the FPX, please use {{FPX contested}} instead. _→AzaToth 22:18, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

"Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator." The FPX is a way to end a nomination within 24 hours. Otherwise, it's just like any other oppose vote. Tomer T (talk) 16:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Knight-in-Shining-Armour.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Knight-in-Shining-Armour.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Platycercus caledonicus - Collinsvale.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Platycercus caledonicus - Collinsvale.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

A note of thanks...

Tomer, I have been away on an assignment and not been able to participate in Wikipedia for the last few months. When I did get a chance I noticed some of my pictures were nominated and promoted to FP on the Commons. That was very kind of you to do that. I have a few more months to go then I hope to get back to adding content to the project. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 03:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome, it's my pleasure. See you soon, Tomer T (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Blue Mosque Courtyard Dusk Wikimedia Commons.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blue Mosque Courtyard Dusk Wikimedia Commons.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mezcala Bridge - Mexico edit1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezcala Bridge - Mexico edit1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dendrobates azureus qtl1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dendrobates azureus qtl1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 11:08, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Changhua Great Buddha Temple amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Changhua Great Buddha Temple amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Daption capense in flight - SE Tasmania.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Daption capense in flight - SE Tasmania.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you !

		The Featured Picture Candidate Barnstar
		For your many excellent nominations, and especially that of File:Great Sand Dunes NP 1.jpg. Keep up the good work ! Claritas (talk) 12:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm very flaterred.

Thank you. Tomer T (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Great Sand Dunes NP 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Great Sand Dunes NP 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:RhB ABe 8-12 Allegra between Lagalb and Ospizio Bernina.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RhB ABe 8-12 Allegra between Lagalb and Ospizio Bernina.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bratislava Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Bratislava Castle R01.jpg: +1
2. Bratislava, Hrad, Slovensko.jpg: +0 
=>
File:Bratislava Castle R01.jpg: Promoted.
File:Bratislava, Hrad, Slovensko.jpg: Declined.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lama 3 Luc Viatour.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lama 3 Luc Viatour.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Kamal Abbas (Cropped)

Kamal Abbas cropped picture is nominated to be a featured on wiki commons. You supported the first nomination so I wonder if you will comment to the current nomination. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 17:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

picture of the year

When can we vote for picture of the year??Trongphu (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't know. Tomer T (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kukenan Roraima GS.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kukenan Roraima GS.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Abondance Louis Petitot Pont Carrousel Paris-CN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abondance Louis Petitot Pont Carrousel Paris.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinestar Metropolis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Saint-Petersburg-Mosque,-dome.jpg

Hello, Tomer T! Thanks you for a nomination of my photo, and I am very glad that you show interest to my works. Yours faithfully, --Aleks G 22:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the wonderful image :) Tomer T (talk) 12:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bahía Onelli Parque Nacional Los Glaciares Patagonia Argentina Luca Galuzzi 2005.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahía Onelli Parque Nacional Los Glaciares Patagonia Argentina Luca Galuzzi 2005.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Hall of Mirrors in Versailles

Hello TomerT,
Thank you so much for nominating as FPC my picture of Hall of Mirrors in the Palace of Versailles. It's a very nice surprise for me! Warm greetings despite the cold here near Paris :-) --Myrabella (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm glad I made you glad :) Thanks for this striking photo! Tomer T (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Durham Ranger salmon fly.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durham Ranger salmon fly.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Your consulting

Hi Tomer T,

Thank you for your consulting, I feel very proud you ask me such a question, as I'm not a so good photographer...

Sorry to be a bit late.

My opinion about this picture is that it has no chance. The subject is good and impressive, but the technical quality is really far under the bar of usual FP promoted pictures IMO. There are many pixellisations, color noise (the kepi), and the left part of the jacket is really bad and blurry. The DoF is not very good (the eye is not in focus)...

Well, I think it is not a good candidate.

But it is only my poor opinion...

Cheers from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice and review. I'll nominate a different picture - as it seems now, it will be in the evening today. You'll find out then what it is... :) By the way, I think you are a great photographer, I really like your pictures. Tomer T (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chateau Versailles Galerie des Glaces.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chateau Versailles Galerie des Glaces.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Cochranella albomaculata

I congratulate you on your fairplay. This is a very good picture I poured in the various wiki. But the rule is the rule. To Withdraw must be put "withdrawn" instead of opposite. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I got it know, after your change. Thank you, Tomer T (talk) 10:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DoemitzerBruecke1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality & nice image composition. --NorbertNagel 19:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-01-22 15-51-12 Spain Canarias El Matorral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly distorted horizon. Otherwise very good picture. -- MJJR 10:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vanadinite sur barytine 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Stu Phillips 16:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:20081206 Alexandros Grigoropoulos december 2008 riots Sina Street Athens Greece.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20081206 Alexandros Grigoropoulos december 2008 riots Sina Street Athens Greece.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:ST vs LOU - 21.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ST vs LOU - 21.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Couvertoirade wind mill 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20090528 Beijing Nine Dragon Wall 7984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 18:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment Lovely. Any chance there is a bit more to the bottom? Saffron Blaze 19:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macro Biro writing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and useful. --D4m1en 15:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WolffiaArrhiza2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ecnomiohyla rabborum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ecnomiohyla rabborum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Braun electric shavers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Cappadoccia Balloon 01.JPG

I thought it was a great find. There are so many places where that image could be featured. Perhaps try again when there are more folks who enjoy featuring beauty as well as archiving things. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I also thought so, but when I found out there isn't much agreement in the crowd about its featurability, I withdrew... Maybe I'll give it another try sometime - I'd be also happy if you can nominate this one... Tomer T (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:DTM Mercedes W204 Lauda09 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DTM Mercedes W204 Lauda09 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naples Pier, Florida.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:MC Kleiner Panda.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MC KleinerPanda.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alocasia cuprea (portrait orientation).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Feature it! --Saffron Blaze 20:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Assessments

Hi, I re-reverted you and I believe I have fixed the issue. It would be better if you pointed out the problem rather than revert me because it takes time for the error to appear and disappear as edits to mass used templates are not immediately applied to all sub pages. :) -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 17:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

OK. Tomer T (talk) 06:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Fayette Station Bridge.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fayette Station Bridge.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Araniella cucurbitina (Cucumber green spider), dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pumpkin pie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Amplexus Bufo bufo 2010-03-29.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amplexus Bufo bufo 2010-03-29.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Erannis-defoliaria-Raupe-Frostspanner.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erannis-defoliaria-Raupe-Frostspanner.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Delist

I nominated File:DTM Mercedes W204 Lauda09 amk.jpg for delisting from FP. Please see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 17:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for noticing me. Tomer T (talk) 18:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Agora and El Puente de l'Assut de l'Or Bridge.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agora and El Puente de l'Assut de l'Or Bridge.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Dinant Meuse

Hi Tomer. Thank you very much for nominating my picture of the Meuse at Dinant for FPC. The comments are rather overwhelming... -- MJJR (talk) 20:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the wonderful picture :) Tomer T (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dark Days Are Coming.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dark Days Are Coming.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dinant Meuse R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dinant Meuse R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Skull nomination

Hi Tomer T,

Thanks a lot for nomination of "my" skull in FP candidates page !--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Gladly :) Tomer T (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Syncerus caffer african buffalo skull MNHN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Syncerus caffer african buffalo skull MNHN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

thank you !--Jebulon (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Papio hamadryas Cologne Zoo.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Papio hamadryas Cologne Zoo.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

A special thanks to you

Hello Tomer T, A special thanks to you at the end of that article posted yesterday on the Wikimedia blog. Greetings, --Myrabella (talk) 08:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I was really proud to read this :) The reall thanks should be given to you for enriching commons and wikipedia with such wonderful pictures. Tomer T (talk) 10:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gulls on Morro Strand State Beach.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gulls on Morro Strand State Beach.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ocypode cursor 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ocypode cursor 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Kids, Namibe, Angola cropped.jpg FP nomination

I just prefer the II one.--Llorenzi (talk) 10:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

What's your opinion about the first? Tomer T (talk) 10:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kids, Namibe, Angola cropped.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kids, Namibe, Angola cropped.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Cropping of images

Please consider not to worse compression parameters when you crop images. For example File:Gulls on Morro Strand State Beach.jpg the version cropped by you shows significant more compression artifacts than the original. Please be more careful in future, thanks. -- smial (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Same problem in File:Kids, Namibe, Angola cropped.jpg which has strong colour artifacts now, which do not appear in the original upload!

That's two featured pictures you're talking about, so I guess the compression isn't that bad. Actually, I can't notice any further artefacts, but I believe you they exist.

In most of my editing, and in all of the simple editing jobs, I use a "primitive" editor software: Windows Live Photo Gallery. I don't know how to set compression paramteres or overcome this technical obstacle. Tomer T (talk) 16:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

FP state does not matter, maybe FP jury does not see everything :-)
If you are using windows, have a look at IrfanView (freeware), which can do some simple image processing (crop, rotate) without loosing too much quality, and is very simple to use. -- smial (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pterula multifida borstenkoralle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Gidip 14:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

FPC Gyps fulvus

Thanks for the hint. Correction (overexposed on the head fur) done. I think, it's better now. --Llez (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kalandula Falls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Didgeridoo street player-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Didgeridoo street player-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

disappointed

You refused my nomination but supported another. Where is logic? --Алый Король (talk) 21:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The logic is that: the rules for FP say that the image's size must be at least 2 mega pixels. The first image is 736,000 pixels (736 × 1,000), the second is 3,737,800 pixels (1,699 × 2,200). I also wrote that on the nomination page. Tomer T (talk) 05:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Unknown jook.JPG

Hi Bernie. I saw you were able to make some identifications on your pictures of Orthoptera, so I was wondering: can you also identify the insect in the above phot? Thanks, Tomer T (talk) 11:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm not a orthopterida expert. I would recommend posting it here: de:Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung, which in my opinion is the only working ID group on Wikipedia.

Thank you, but I don't know German. Tomer T (talk) 21:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Friendly Beaches 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Friendly Beaches 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

FP candidate File:Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG

Does this FP candidate Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG violates copyright on commons? Please see discussion on its nomination page. There are so many images of durga idol there in commons for many years. This is a QI and VI. I am asking you because you have supported the image for FP. What is your thought about this? Thanks in advance. -- Joydeep (talk) 16:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Misumena vatia qtl2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Misumena vatia qtl2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Question

Hi Tomer, I see that the confirmed result of the featured picture voting for Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model K-52 (mahogany finish), manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg was "not featured". 2 supported the featured picture nomination and just 1 opposed. I don't understand why the confirmed result is "not featured", because the result of the voting is "featured". Will you please explain. Thank you. --Hereiamfriends (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

For a picture to be featured, there have to be at least 7 supporters and 2/3 majority. Please read the guidelines. Tomer T (talk) 08:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your answer. --Hereiamfriends (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bernache.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bernache.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

hi

I thank you a lot about some information that i should know regarding this[3]. Then why old images are featured though they have less pixels?

I have many images taken by old cameras means not digital for example model called Nikon F75? how do i change it to digital with out lossing the quality and time of shooting.--Neogeolegend (talk) 05:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Even if i upload good image no body will vote because all the voters are connected together and they know each other.--Neogeolegend (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

And last, do you think this image below could featured!

I don't know what do you mean by old images. If do you mean there are any FPs (featured pictures) less than 2 MPX that were voted to FP in 2005 or 2006, that's because that rule wasn't a rule then. You can try to nominate the image above, my personal opinion is that it's not impressive enough (FPs are the best commons have, and compare it to other FPs of flowers), but that's only my opinion - and maybe others will think otherwise. Tomer T (talk) 06:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Holzbrücke 2011-02-10 15-15-08.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holzbrücke 2011-02-10 15-15-08.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Måbødalen, 2011 August.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Måbødalen, 2011 August.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

A big thank you

Dear TomerT,
Thank you so much for the care you take in nominating and supporting two of my images in FPC. It's always a nice surprise and furthermore a true encouragement to go on taking and sharing pictures. I am happy that you appreciate some of mine! Cheers, --Myrabella (talk) 20:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

It's always a pleasure to nominate your wonderful pics. You're a true asset to Commons. Keep on with the good work! Tomer T (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Saarbrücken, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

hello tomer

hi tomer! I need your help to put this[4] to be candidates to valued and quality image because the procedures is complicated to go through.

Do you see any special with this image i uploaded? thanks.

--Neogeolegend (talk) 04:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

I put this to Quality image candidates. Valued images are images which are the most valuable of a certain scope, and the image isn't categorized. It also has to be geotagged to be Value image, and the image isn't geotagged. Tomer T (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Coulommiers lait cru.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coulommiers lait cru.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden Bucket of a well.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. --Orikrin1998 10:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Belgique Butte du Lion dit de Waterloo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belgique Butte du Lion dit de Waterloo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Mistake edit?

Hello Tomer! I saw you nominating my image, but then this happened. Mistake? —kallerna™ 16:00, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Now nominated again. Tomer T (talk) 19:39, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Perdrix rouge MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Perdrix rouge MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you it's a real pleasure. I would never have dared to propose. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

You made the image, I only nominated. So the thanks is to you :) Is it your first egg FP? Tomer T (talk) 17:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Local privacy laws

Hi, do you know what the local laws are concerning consent? In most countries consent is not required if a photo is taken in a public place with no expectation of privacy. I have emailed my embassy in Tel Aviv but you may know already. There is concern about it in one of the FP candidates: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Woman outside Sepulchre-2.jpg--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:47, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't know, but I'll approach to a wikipedian who probably knows. Tomer T (talk) 18:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I created and added a help me-he template to the talk page of the image. This created a new category users who need help in Hebrew. It seems there are a few languages missing. I don't know if they are patrolled very much though. I can set it as resolved after it is.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Found it. File:PrivacyOrder81.pdf and the english translation.

Resolved

--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

POTY 2011

Hi, if you find errors in this year's POTY, please let us know or join the committee or simply correct them. Miya wants to start voting in a few hours. Thanks in advance. -- RE rillke questions? 17:56, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Actually, every time I try to get in, I got an error. I will screenshoot it and upload later. Tomer T (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

No need. You reported the error, which allowed me to address the issue. Simply purge your browser's cache. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 18:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Great. It's good now. Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chaussure chinoise Saverne 02 05 2012 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chaussure chinoise Saverne 02 05 2012 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

hi tomer

will you move this file[5] because this bucket may be made of a leather or something. It's a mistake from me. you could choose to a title name "a leather bucket of a well". and how i add Camera location for it?

--Neogeolegend (talk) 23:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't have the ability to move files. Only file movers can do it. You can add Template:Rename to the page (the instructions how to add it are on Template:Rename page). About location: see Template:Location (You should find the coordinates and insert them through that template; usually they are recorded on the camera and uploaded automatically). Tomer T (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your Vote (Picture of the Year)

It seems one of your votes is undefined. Maybe this is related to Can't_vote_on_ogv_files. Could you please try to vote again and remove your undefined vote? --McZusatz (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I apologize for this serious application error. The file you voted for was one of the two videos (1, 2). Simply revisit the gallery, click on the statistics-button next to the video and add your vote manually if it does not work properly this time. You can use # [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]] for manual voting. Thanks in advance. -- RE rillke questions? 15:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Done. Tomer T (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iranian Tiles.JPG

I've uploaded an alternative to the original that you voted on. I wonder if you would consider whether that is an improvement. -- Colin (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Edificio principal, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edificio principal, Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

	Hello, Tomer T. You have new messages at Russavia's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sorbus scalaris - mountain ash - farnblättrige Eberesche 30.jpg

Oppose I was about to support, because this is a good, interesting photo, but I found errors in the background, not being entirely black. Tomer T (talk) 22:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for this hint. I uploaded an improved version. Please have another look. (Don't forget to delete/update your browser cache, otherwise you see the old version. Regards -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

- Much better now, but there are still some grays. Tomer T (talk) 12:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'don't see any grays. Can you please mark the regions with notes? -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 12:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Luminale 2012 - Resonate-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luminale 2012 - Resonate-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:BennyTrapp Hyla intermedia Italien.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BennyTrapp Hyla intermedia Italien.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

hi tomer

I want to ask a question!. In the upload wizard in this site wikimedia commons, it says if you upload your picture someone could use and sale it! how it's possible without even permission. commons for share alike this is what i know. could you reply me please!--Neogeolegend (talk) 10:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't know. Try asking at Commons:Help desk. Tomer T (talk) 11:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I would like you to add your support here[6] --Neogeolegend (talk) 12:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Castelbouc gorges du Tarn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castelbouc gorges du Tarn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kallima inachus qtl1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kallima inachus qtl1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Invitation - Featured picture voting

Dear Tomer,

Thank you very much for your last participating in a featured picture voting about a musical instrument. I would kindly ask you if you would like to give your vote (and comments) in this featured picture voting about an upright piano of mahogany "Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model K-52 (mahogany finish), manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg" before it ends on 23 Jun 2012 at 08:07:03 (UTC).

Thanks!

Yours sincerely, --Hereiamfriends (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gavarnie recti small Wikimedia Commons.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gavarnie recti small Wikimedia Commons.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Pterophorus pentadactyla MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pterophorus pentadactyla MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Pterophorus pentadactyla

Thank you for pterophorus pentadactyla. There are many in my lawn. Despite my efforts to avoid them, many going on in my lawn mower, they do not fly very well ... :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

It seems like a really cool animal. I have never seen it before. From clips in Youtube, it seems like they stand still most of the time. Tomer T (talk) 07:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you again

for this additional nomination. You have good instinct for FPs :) Best regards, Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC) PD: By the way, I agree with some comments and I would like to improve symmetry, contrast and sharpness, if you don't mind.

It's my pleasure. Thank you ;) And about the improvements - I'm not sure it's proper to do after the picture is featured; I don't really know what the routine in this case. By the way, I also nominated the picture to FP in Hebrew Wikipedia - see here. Tomer T (talk) 06:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure about that either, there is no policy regulating this kind of things. Still, I think that I can improve the picture easily. Recently I had such a case, a user significantly improved this FP (at least in my opinion), but you never know what others would say... Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC) PD: A candidate to FP in the hebrew Wikipedia, cool!

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Phelsuma grandis, Stuttgart Zoological Garden.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phelsuma grandis, Stuttgart Zoological Garden.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Schneeräumung Saltfjell.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schneeräumung Saltfjell.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:SNCF TGV PSE Viaduc de Cize - Bolozon.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF TGV PSE Viaduc de Cize - Bolozon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Echinocactus grusonii qtl1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Echinocactus grusonii qtl1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Graphosoma lineatum qtl1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graphosoma lineatum qtl1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hello Tomer T, I got some good feedback in QIC about this picture and since you have such a good smell regarding potential FP I would like to know your opinion. Jebulon also created a version of it, that could be an option. Thanks for your time and best regards, Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your compliment. I can never know if a picture will pass, but I like this one and I think it can pass. I prefer the edit. Tomer T (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Salvia pratensis 006.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salvia pratensis 006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:The Calatrava Eye.jpg

File:The Calatrava Eye.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

124.149.151.113 15:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Fogo São Filipe shop.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fogo São Filipe shop.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hasfield Court Gloucestershire.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hasfield Court Gloucestershire.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi

יש לי סדרה של תמונות מאותו נושא שאני רוצה להציע למומלצות. נראה לי שהם עומדים מצוין בקריטריונים. אבל הייתי רוצה לראות קודם מקרים אחרים של סטים שכבר הוצעו. אתה מכיר כאלה? האם סט שהתקבל מופיע בתור סט במאגרי התמונות המומלצות, או שכל תמונה מופיעה לחוד? חיפשתי סטים כאלה ולא מצאתי. תודה, גידי. Gidip (talk) 11:50, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

יש למשל את זה ואת זה. במקרה של האחרון אני זה ששיבצתי את התמונות בדפי התמונות המומלצות, ופיזרתי אותן כתמונות עצמאיות בדף של המפות המומלצות. יש למעשה גם פירוט של ההיבט הפורמלי מאחורי העמדת סט להצבעה, כאן, תחת Set nominations. Tomer T (talk) 13:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

תודה Gidip (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Eublepharis macularius 2009 G6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eublepharis macularius 2009 G6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cancer bellianus Johnston 1861 stuffed museum La Rochelle .jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cancer bellianus Johnston 1861 stuffed museum La Rochelle .jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:ARS-habanero.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ARS-habanero.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you so much for nomination my photo to FPC at enwiki. I have a similar photo (on the right side). It has successfully passed QI and VI. Is it worth nominating? If yes would you be kind enough to nominate it on FPC at enwiki (and commons (if you think so))? Again thanks.

Regards. JDP90 (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'll nominate it in en.wiki, but not in Commons (since Commons has a nomination limit, and I wait for my older current nomination to end so I can nominate some other picture I have in mind). Regards, Tomer T (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I want to know that does this image possess the quality to become FP on commons (If I nominate it on commons)? -- JDP90 (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I think it has potential. My only concern is regarding the distracting color reflection in the middle lense: can it be modified? Tomer T (talk) 16:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I have tried to remove the reflection and updated the photo. Please have a look. -- JDP90 (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I tried to have a look at it, but I still found that reflection. I also tried to delete the saved files in my browser and load it again, but it didn't work. I add an annotation, just to make sure we're talking on the same thing. Tomer T (talk) 11:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I thought something else. Sorry, I think I wont be able to modify that because I'm not very good at digital manipulation. -- Joydeep (talk) 12:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:SagiHaviv Headshot.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SagiHaviv Headshot.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SagiHaviv Headshot.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Monkey Puzzle

Hi Tomer:

Thanks for fix. Regards, -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 10:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Tomer T (talk) 15:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

FP

Our cooperation with scientists starting to work well. Yesterday I had the pleasure of having three images published in "NATURE". Our job is running, and the level of image quality and encyclopedias continue to rise. Thank you for the promotion of my images that I dare not do it myself. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

You're doing a great job! Keep going! :) Tomer T (talk) 15:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

spinning

For many centuries, spinning plant fibers into yarn/thread was the stereotypical women's work and often a sort of symbol of femininity. However, beginning in the late eighteenth century, and ever more so as the nineteenth century wore on, it was heavily mechanized in British factories (first by water-power, then by steam-power). By the late nineteenth century, machine weaving had driven out almost all hand-weaving, so how could hand-spinning be cost-effective in a territory right next to, and commercially exposed to, British industries? In his Memoir of Jane Austen, Jane Austen's nephew James Edward Austen-Leigh (born 1798) explains the spinning situation, and says that he can "only just remember some of its last struggles for existence in the Steventon cottages" (in the early 19th century). Ireland was no doubt a few years behind southern England, but by 1890 there couldn't have been much difference. Churchh (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the elaborating explanation. Seems pretty convincing to me :) Tomer T (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ánsar común (Anser anser), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ánsar común (Anser anser), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)