User talk:Stevenfruitsmaak
Welcome
[edit]
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.--EugeneZelenko 18:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Gorki albumcover hijleeft.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
William Avery 20:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Gorki albumcover Gorky.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
|
In answer to your question, please see Commons:Derivative_works William Avery 21:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
An administrator User:Nilfanion has very promptly deleted these covers. William Avery 21:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I have read your note now. This is highly unusual and needs a clear note on all those images. 99.9% of covers uploaded are copyvios, no matter what licences the uploaders claim. William Avery 21:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
All I can see is that GFDL is claimed on the nl image page; just because it is claimed on a different project does not mean that that license is valid - where does it say that the cd cover was freely licensed? I tried following the link to the forum mentioned on the nl image but all that gives is a 404 error. If you can give evidence that the GFDL is correct I will undelete.--Nilfanion 21:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Commons does have undeletion (finally it only got implemented for images a couple weeks back). Mind you is it really needed, I'd have thought it would be easier to go back to the original images on nl. However, if you would rather upload from commons I'll undelete for you. As an aside with these images, you would need to provide a direct link to the source of the image and the permission; if the dutch image was deleted as now on Commons, how can the info be verified easily?--Nilfanion 21:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Having reviewed this a bit I suspect you might well be lucky and find the release agreement. If you do so, if you forward it to me I'll be happy to undelete the images. However, as they are not currently permissible I have deleted them all. Cheers.--Nilfanion 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Deletion of Image:SDekker.jpg
[edit]Hallo Steven, ik heb begrepen dat je Nederlands als moedertaal hebt, dus praat ik voor het gemak in het Nederlands. Ik zag dat je het Image:SDekker.jpg en Image:Donner.jpg hebt voorgedragen voor verwijdering. Voor de afbeelding van Donner is dit volledig correct, dit was de beste foto die ik kon vinden op internet om bij een nieuwsartikel te plaatsen op Wikinews. Aangezien het uploaden van bestanden uitgeschakeld is op wikinews, heb ik het hier naar toe geuploaded. Deze afbeelding kan dan ook worden verwijderd. Bij de afbeelding van Dekker is dit echter absoluut niet terecht. Deze afbeelding is door WikipediaNL verkregen van de webmaster van de VVD-site, en is een VVD-foto. Alle foto's van de VVD vallen onder Publiek Domein, zie de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia. Ik vraag dan ook, het weg-sjabloon van SDekker.jpg te verwijderen. Adnergje 08:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Transiting planet HD 209458b.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Samulili 12:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
re: Wikinews
[edit]Hi Steven,
Sounds like a cool project. :) How often are you planning to update the template? Every day, every week?
I don't think announcing the project on the VP is likely to yield many ongoing results. I will mention it on the admin board for those doing new images patrol.
I wonder if using CatScan in some way won't be useful...hmm...
--pfctdayelise (说什么?) 00:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hi,
- We could put something in the sitenotice but it seems a bit off-target to me. It will show to everyone when you're only really trying to target admins/new images patrol people, correct? So it's a little bit "spam" like... how long do you want such an announcement for?
- As for CatScan, you can choose to see the most recent edits to items in the category, so you could find items recently added to the category (and presumably recently uploaded) - "Self-published work" means you're only seeing "Self-made" work. It might be helpful, or not. I dunno.
- Anyway after some thought, I have to say it is likely that if Wikinews wants to keep this alive, it will have to be Wikinewsies who do the bulk of the work (or perhaps Commons starts publishing it on the main page too and that will motivate people :)). But you can post on the admin's noticeboard right? You don't need me to do that... COM:AN. cheers --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 15:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:John Key video Wikinews screenshot.jpg
[edit]I have tagged Image:John Key video Wikinews screenshot.jpg for speedy deletion as a derivative work of Image:Wikinews john key.ogg which was speedy deleted as "against policy". --Iamunknown 02:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Wikinews_year_overview_2007_animated.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Nard 18:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
QI
[edit]Dag Steven. Quality labels liefst niet zelf aanbrengen. Indien geen Consensual Review (CR), gebeurt dit automatisch door QICbot na 48-72 uur. CR kan namelijk alsnog binnen 48 uur door iemand anders worden ingeroepen. Indien wel CR wordt dit meestal door de 'eindvoltrekker' van het proces gedaan (vaak Tony Wills). Mvg, Lycaon 23:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Excuses zeker niet nodig, en de rest heb ik zelf al opgelost. No worries :-). Lycaon 23:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Nog wakker? Wat vind je hier van ;-) ? Lycaon 01:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windmill Antimahia Kos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Jude Medical pacemaker in hand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hadrian's Wall west of Housesteads 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hey Steven,
This is a cool image, nice work.
However please keep in mind for the future, that you should never use just the CC "some rights reserved" logo to indicate a specific CC license. Either use the little icons that indicate specific license components (little person for "BY", circular arrow for "SA"), or specifically write the license by name ("CC-BY-xx" or "CC-BY-SA-xx" where xx is the number version). thanks, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- I like the new logo a lot.
- As for voting, I would prefer to see more participation from Wikinewsies first. Also, I don't like the requirement to register an account. :P
- BTW, if you do this again in the future I think it would be considerate not to do it at the same time as Commons. Also, is it Wikinews or only English Wikinews competition? I didn't notice any input from other Wikinews language editions.
- cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Wikinews year overview 2007 animated.gif frame removal
[edit]The image of Pavarotti (Image:Pavarotti's face.jpg) was deleted from commons (looks like a flickr copyvio). I tried removing this from the animated slideshow, but it reduced the quality of the image too. Maybe you should have a try, perhaps you'll have better results than my attempt. —Zachary talk 15:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! York Castle Clifford's Tower 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Muhammad Yunus
[edit]Answered via e-mail due to potential privacy issues. -- Avi 02:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Kim_Gevaert_2002.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Kim_Gevaert_2002.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 14:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 2189dfa8b441cd6f3e0ce2e40e0d0297
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Inheritance
[edit]Dear Stevenfruits, Two images are ready: Image:Autorecessive en 01.png and Image:Autodominant en 01.png. Please check them and give me an answer if they have any errors or missing data.
Best regards --Kuebi 17:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
RE:Vendetta
[edit]That's in fact the case. We have been discusing the actual copyright of the masks here, and we have reach the conclusion that the design is copyrighted, so, all those images fall under the deritivative category. Cheers, Gizmo II ¿Eu? 20:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Sint-Janshuismolen Brugge
[edit]Waarom zijn de wieken van de Sint-Janshuismolen in Brugge in de Nederlandse kleuren geschilderd? Goede vraag. Het antwoord is vermoedelijk dat het niet om de Nederlandse kleuren gaat (en evenmin om het Franse "bleu-blanc-rouge"), maar gewoon om de Brugse kleuren. Op het wapenschild van Brugge staat namelijk al eeuwen lang een blauwe leeuw op een veld van rode en witte (of zilveren) horizontale banden. Met vriendelijke groeten, MJJR (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC).
Image:Appartment buildings at Praia da Rocha, Portimão.jpg
[edit]Hi
i think, that this photo is still a little tilted to right.
Regards -Pudelek (talk) 10:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Praia da Rocha, Portimão 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Praia da Rocha, Portimão fisherman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File deletion warning | File:Acromegaly_prognathism.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Abigor talk 21:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, you got a respond. Abigor talk 21:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Vervenne Oosterlinck LOKO Veto.jpg may be deleted
[edit]
The File:Vervenne Oosterlinck LOKO Veto.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot(talk) 20:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Ambiguous genitalia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--MishMich (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 02:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Location of British embassy, Tehran.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Montpellier, the 12th of April 2010
Subject : permission for use of images
Dear Sir The Centre Ethique International (International Ethical Center) organised as one of several Inter-Cultural Events for Peace, a theme week-end on the discovery of India at Palavas-les-Flots (France) the 22nd, 23rd and 24th of May 2009. With the presence of many artists, the week-end gave a chance to discover, part of the richness, deepness and variety of Indian culture. We are in the process of making a 20 minute film presenting the week-end, that will be visible on our web site www.centreethique.com so as to inform the visitors on the events we organise. The video is mainly edited with material filmed during the week-end itself, however to illustrate a sequence on « Kathakali dances » wish to include the photography reference « katakali artist putting on makeup in Kochi, Kerala, India » (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Katakali_makeup.jpg) and therefore ask for your pemission to do so.
Thankyou for replying as soon as it is possible for you.
Best regards
Nathanael Durix, Secretary of the International Ethical Center, centre.ethique@orange.fr, www.centreethique.com
permission for use of images
[edit]Montpellier, the 12th of April 2010
Dear Sir The Centre Ethique International (International Ethical Center) organised as one of several Inter-Cultural Events for Peace, a theme week-end on the discovery of India at Palavas-les-Flots (France) the 22nd, 23rd and 24th of May 2009. With the presence of many artists, the week-end gave a chance to discover, part of the richness, deepness and variety of Indian culture. We are in the process of making a 20 minute film presenting the week-end, that will be visible on our web site www.centreethique.com so as to inform the visitors on the events we organise. The video is mainly edited with material filmed during the week-end itself, however to illustrate a sequence on « Kathakali dances » wish to include the photography reference « katakali artist putting on makeup in Kochi, Kerala, India » (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Katakali_makeup.jpg) and therefore ask for your pemission to do so.
Thankyou for replying as soon as it is possible for you.
Best regards
Nathanael Durix, Secretary of the International Ethical Center, centre.ethique@orange.fr, www.centreethique.com
I've a concern that the image of the Simpsons in this image means its non free. You said you've others ,can you upload one with out the TV or where the TV is off Gnevin (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- The logo's of the pizza's and the beer bottles aren't free either. I don't believe that the image should be deleted just because the TV is on. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is an issue.Better to be safe than sorry. Gnevin (talk) 11:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have several other photos but none were the TV is shut off I think. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 09:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Acromegaly facial features.JPEG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acromegaly facial features.JPEG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Acromegaly growth hormone levels.JPEG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acromegaly growth hormone levels.JPEG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Acromegaly hands.JPEG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acromegaly hands.JPEG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Acromegaly prognathism.JPEG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acromegaly prognathism.JPEG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Acromegaly treatment diagram.JPEG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Acromegaly treatment diagram.JPEG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 10:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- |Source=Acromegaly. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2008, 3:17. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-3-17
|Date=Published: 25 June 2008 |Author=Philippe Chanson and Sylvie Salenave
and similar. I've checked the journal webpage, articles and so on and couldnt get the licensing information - it might be hidden or put in some other place, but with the information you provided, I couldnt verify licenses. I restored images, so maybe you can correct these issues. Masur (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- So please put all neccessary information to the file descriptions (permission="here link") and everything would be fine. Masur 16:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Aaa, someone deleted them - now I restored them. Please correct the descriptions. Masur 16:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- It's my duty as an admin :) Thanks for filling the missing info in. Masur (talk) 10:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Aaa, someone deleted them - now I restored them. Please correct the descriptions. Masur 16:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Regions and language areas of Belgium
[edit]Hi,
unfortunately, you made a mistake in the Map of belgian regions [1]. It looks like there is a bilingual German/French area in the east of Belgium. This is wrong. There is a French language area, making up most of the region of Wallonie and a German language area, the east of Wallonie. This latter one therefore must be in blue color, not striped. Regards 95.114.20.36 11:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Lupus_facial_rash.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Shureg (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Monthly multiple sclerosis MRI.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bomazi (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Map of Belgium
[edit]Hi Stevenfruitsmaak, your map is nice but misleading: the text below says "blue = German speaking", but the (monolingual!) German speaking area in the map is hashed blue/red. Maybe you had in mind that red may depict both the french language region and the wallon region - but this cannot be depicted like this. There should be 4 colors: yellow (=Region Vlaanderen = monlingual dutch+french), orange (=Region Brussels, bilingual), red (=french-speaking part of Wallonia), blue (=german speaking part of wallonia). Then also the colorful table in [2] can be simplified: the table cell "german speaking" needn't be splitted! 95.113.220.219 10:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Performing shoulder arthroscopy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Performing shoulder arthroscopy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Pontocerebellar hypoplasia MRI images 1750-1172-6-50-1-l.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pontocerebellar hypoplasia MRI images 1750-1172-6-50-1-l.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Eleassar (t/p) 20:32, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Pontocerebellar hypoplasia MRI images 1750-1172-6-50-1-l.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 21:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Pontocerebellar hypoplasia MRI 1750-1172-7-18-4-l.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 21:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
OUP : Hires Image & Permission
[edit]Hi,
I am writing to you from Six Red Marbles, the largest development house for learning material in the United States. At Six Red Marbles we are dedicated to bringing the power of natural learning to every classroom, pre-K through adult. The company has developed thousands of creative, effective multi-media educational material for leading publishers including McGraw-Hill, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Scholastic and Pearson.
The book we are at present working on is titled IB Biology Study Guide.
We are interested in using the attached photo. We believe this picture is under your copyright and we would be obliged if you could give us a high-res version and the permission to use it in our book.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:St_Jude_Medical_pacemaker_with_ruler.jpg
I am sending you the details of the project below:
Book title : IB Biology Study Guide Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP) Clearance details: World All languages, Print & Electronic. Usage: Interior Duration: 15 years Print Run : 40,000.
Please do let me know if you would need further information to help process our request.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Regards, Bhaskar.
Bhaskar Chandra Visual Editor Six Red Marbles 317/318, Unitech Trade Centre, Sushant Lok 01, Gurgaon, Haryana, India, 122002 b.chandra@sixredmarbles.com | www.sixredmarbles.com Tel: +91-124-4496850/55 | Mo: +91-9818970659 Twitter: twitter.com/sixredmarbles Facebook: www.facebook.com/sixredmarbles
sixredmarbles FUN IDEAS. SERIOUS LEARNING.
Think Creativity. See Beauty. Explore Learning. Feel Progress
Inactive Image-reviewers
[edit]Hello Stevenfruitsmaak, there is a discussion about a request regarding your image-reviewer user right, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Inactive_Image-reviewers. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Phocomelia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alexanderpayatakes (talk) 01:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Circadian rhythm labeled.jpg
[edit]I'd like to thank you for your lovely image.
However, 400 × 267 pixels is a bit small for my purposes (full-page print for personal reference) and there isn't a larger version available on the item page.
- Could you add a larger version of this image? If possible, one approximately 3 times the size (cropped to page proportions) would be ideal.
Also: Are you aware that Wikipedia's article on the Suprachiasmic Nucleus has no other diagram clearly showing its location in the brain?
- You may want to adapt your source image, removing the circadian info, to provide a clear diagram for the SCN article.
Thank you for all your hard work. --SoSaysSunny (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
File:HD 189733b.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Huntster (t @ c) 07:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fordyce.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fordyce.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th
[edit]It is a world event.
This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). |
--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Wikinews year overview 2007 animated.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |