User talk:Sdrtirs/Archive 1

Archive 1 | Archive 2 →

This is an archive of past discussions. Please, do not edit the contents of this page! Please start a new topic at the bottom of the current talk page and sign your entries by inserting " ~~~~" at the end.

Please do not make any edits to this archive.

---

bollywoodsargam.com

I wouldn't trust anything from that site. Given that this and other obvious copyvios are in the same gallery, with the same kind of treatment, it seems clear that the blogger is not bothering to care about who actually owns the images. --dave pape 20:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sunrise_Adams2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Sunrise_Adams2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 5b0d124ac77f1311643dfbfdfd9087db

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image deletions

Hi - the fact that the author blanks an image license/description is not a reason to delete the image I'm afraid. Once licensed the image no longer "belongs" to the original uploader (assuming the license was valid). Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:00, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Nope - the "completely blank" there refers to the fact that there is no image (it does happen) not the fact that there is no text.

What may be the case is that they change their mind with licensing. The trouble there is that once licensed it cannot be revoked which is far harder to deal with :). Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Warning and Thai licences

Dear Sdrtirs,

I have uploaded the portrait of the King of Thailand in good faith. The words "fair use" were not mentioned on the Thai Wikipedia. You will probably understand that as a Dutchman I can't read Thai script. I gave the original Thai licence as information when I uploaded the picture on Wikipedia Commons. Therefore I find the warning a little harsh.

Faithfull yours,

Robert Prummel (talk) 18:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Groningen
The Netherlands

James Fraser Mustard

Hi there, I gave you all the information you needed to verify the status of the James Fraser Mustard photo, so get busy and verify it, or stick it up your arse and I swear I will never contribute a single thing every a bloody gain. Actually, when I was working with Fraser today, he said he couldn't care less whether he even had a wikipedia entry or not. Randal Oulton (talk) 02:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

about the description

hi, thanks for your notice. Could you please tell me the name of the bad description photo? The most photo I upload come from flickr, but some of them lack of the description in flickr and I just only use my understanding as the description.--atlaslin (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

you can check the original photo in flickr, where is none description at all, and what I see is just a nude asian woman in this photo, so I name it and also add it into Category "nude women", I wonder what can I do else?

So I'm confused, what's your opnion about this photo? I think the description about this photo is enough to express the information of it, and I think my description about it is not "bad"?--atlaslin (talk) 11:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Then thanks for your help and advice again!--atlaslin (talk) 11:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Stop!

Hello Sdrtirs, please stop adding {{Svg}} to German Coats of arms. It is not neccessary and will be removed if found. There are 20.000 COAs from Germany which are not SVG, and which are also not marked with {{Svg}}. So please stop and play at another place. Thanks. ChristianBier (talk) 15:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

TXH

Dziękuję, thanks a lot :) Joymaster (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

I own the copyrights to my images!!!

Don't flag them! It's my band.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomgong (talk • contribs) 23:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Dizi.jpg

i have solved the template problem.most of our template has this problem.i will fix it soon.--Mardetanha ^talk 22:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

About my images.

Hello, my own work isn't illegal image. Why you speedly deleting report??Nnq2603 (talk) 04:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I see. Lưu Ly (talk) 10:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:BMCL-Logo.svg

Hi. You just marked Image:BMCL-Logo.svg as a copyvio. Question: I just used the original logo as a template and created it from scratch with Inkscape. Is this also a copyvio? --hdamm (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

So, as I created this image, I am the copyright holder, right? --hdamm (talk) 14:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

What about Image:BTS Logo Bangkok Skytrain.png then? Sorry, but I can't see the difference. --hdamm (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

You asked: "Who created this Image:BMCL-Logo.png?" As I said before (above), I created it from scratch with Inkscape software. --hdamm (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Another Question: who decides if a logo applies to {{Template:PD-textlogo}}? Wouldn't this also apply to my picture? --hdamm (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Addendum: the font in my picture is just a plain Arial. Eh - is this a free font? Its delivered with any Windows-Diskette/CD/DVD. --hdamm (talk)

why?

why is a violation? --Sistemx (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

"Test"

It wasn't a test. It doesn't seem reasonable to me to expect someone to create an SVG file for an image that's being updated several times a day from a US government website. Evercat (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Image:Ubiquity_Screenshot.png

Thank you for your help, and is the image legal right now?Ryanli (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image Tagging Image:Escudo de Zarauz.png

Su permiso: Wikipedia:Autorizaciones/Vexilla Hispanica. Vaskk (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Pues mira esto: [1]. Vaskk (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Ya ves que estás muy equivocado, portugués. Por favor, no te metas en asuntos que no conozcas. Vaskk (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Recently deleted

The images you've tagged for speedy deletion are works of the U.S. government, specifically the Area Support Group for the Qatar branch of the United States Army's Public Affairs Office. Would you mind removing the tags? GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 21:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

The images in question are Image:Campbell, Elden (2008).jpg, Image:Bradley, Shawn (2008) 2.jpg, Image:Bradley, Brown, Campbell, and Gugliotta.jpg, and Image:Gugliotta, Tom (2008).jpg. Please be more careful in future, and you may wish to amend your notification to include the actual names of the images that you are proposing for deletion. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 21:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

The *design* of the site is copyrighted, but DVIDS is an archive of public domain photographs from various branches of the United States military. Each page for individual photographs gives specific credit, which is what should have been checked. In any case, it doesn't really matter, so long as nothing was deleted :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 21:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

hi

im new here what is fair use?? --Sistemx (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Liliana Campos.jpg

Nice work with the watermark! It looks that it wasn't there.--Sdrtirs (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. All the images of Category:Images with watermarks are not as pleasant to work as this one. --CHristoPHE 07:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The image violation

• the image Continental-Logo.svg , i get it from the English wikipedia and put it here to allow other wikipedias to include it , instead of uploading it to every wikipedia
• that's because i was going to write an article about it in the Arabic wikipedia!! BAsM.Egy (talk)

scope

Hi,Sdrtirs. I'd like to know what scope my image wasn't within. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 18:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Obrigado por me responder. Mas esse é um emoticon grátis assim como todos os outros que estão na categoria deles. Não menti dizendo que foi feito por mim, eu mesmo disse que o autor é desconhecido pois o mesmo é encontrado em quaquer lugar e não é atribuído a ninguém. E não precia ser hostil pq eu não fui com vc. SdsMizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Não sabia da existência dessa page. Mas eu peguei foi daqui [2]. E de qualquer forma, o MSN messenger não é um software livre? Logo o copyright seria para o site do MSN e não para o programa e derivadosMizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 19:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

• Entendi. Essas coisas de livre às vezes me complica um pouco. Agora eu tive mais duas imagens deletadas que não pertencem ao MSN e nenhum programa ou site. Essas duas aqui imagem:-hoho-.png, File:´´(.png. Você sabe pq elas foram deletadas? Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 12:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Mas esses emoticons não são do MSN, eles são mais usados no MSN. Eu quis dizer que eles são mais difundidos por lá. O Messenger é o lugar onde os emoticons são mais usados. Por via das dúvidas entra no Messenger ou pede para alguém de sua confiança entra lá e conferir. O único que eu upei que era de fato Messenger foi o "rolleyes" Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey there...

You seem an awful good RC patroller... may I nominate you for admin? --SB_Johnny ^talk 00:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I'd support - you've kept us pretty busy on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism :-) —Giggy 01:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Teochew Wikipedia Logo

Hi Sdrtirs,

This is what you want me to fill in, right?

Description = Wikipedia-logo-dzu-big

Source =

Date = 9/3/08

Author = User:Jose77

Permission =

other_versions = None

But how do I fill in the "source" and "permission" section? I had copied it from this logo and then modified it the "Paint" Application.

--Jose77 (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! I will bother you no more. --Jose77 (talk) 09:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Sun tanning

Sun tanning is an action (verb). This action is not seen on any of the images you've tagged. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 21:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

"Vandalisms"

I've replied to your accusations . Any comments on that? --Leafnode 12:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem :) I hope that everything is clear now :) --Leafnode 14:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of images

You have deleted images of a international well-known person. The images are with him together with international well-known politicians, religious dignitaries and artists. Please undelete any images right now as this is work in progress. The person depicted are recently deceased and in the news in Norway. [3] and [4] If you claim those images are without the scoope of the project I would like to have the policy given by exact quotes. Jeblad (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

TBVE sent them to me for uploading. They run a news magazine, and has theur own photographers, so any photos taken as part of the photographers work is implicitt released to TBVE according to Norwegian law. If you claim they do not have the right to do so, then I prefer you contact them. You may contact Geir Ingar Egeland, press coordinator at TBVE, either at geir(at)tbve.no or (47) 92 22 57 27. Otherwise I prefer that you remove your tagging of the images. Jeblad (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

If you have any more claims I prefer that you back them with hard facts. Jeblad (talk) 16:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

The RfA

Sorry it didn't end up going your way. I'm glad you're still hanging around here. You do great work, so thanks for keeping it up. Cheers, Giggy (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

speedy-tags

Could you please add reasons to the tags. A short one is enough, just so that the admin knows what went on. There are several where it's very difficult to guess what went on in your brain ;-) -- Cecil (talk) 15:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Derivative Work?

Hi, Sdrtirs! Please explain me, why file uploaded by me (Image:Flag Ukrainian template.png) you mark as a derivative work? The wiki puzzle from image I taken from Commons and it is in public domain. In what my mistake? -- Rino ap Codkelden (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:SurfaceInsRadiant.png

I would like to know why this image was a copyvio... The software w:GtkRadiant is GPL.. So it should be OK to use screenshots of that software, shouldn't it? -Yzmo (talk) 20:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

But Microsoft Windows windows are copyrighted, then they aren't free.--Sdrtirs (talk) 20:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, so every um.. window with a windows border on it is a copyvio.. my bad.. So this means i would have to crop the border? Or is there a license that fits, since its quite hard to make good wikibooks without screenshots. -Yzmo (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Remove all things copyrighted by Microsoft. This is a little annoying but that's what has to be done. Sorry for the inconvenience.--Sdrtirs (talk) 21:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:David Yow-6cut.jpg

Hello. I've seen you had added on this image a tag requiering flickr review. In fact, as I've indicated on the description, I've extracted myself this image from Image:David Yow-6.jpg, which has already been reviewed by a bot. I don't know if the bot may check it out properly, because the image is different from the one on flickr. I'm afraid the bot replaces the extracted image by the original, or something else wrong. Maybe I have not done everything properly, I'm not very familiar with commons.

I hope you can tell me...

Thank you

Xic667 (talk) 22:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Please excuse if my message is not clear, I'm not perfectly at ease with english.

I understood the problem when you shown me those two images. In the description of the cropped image version, please make reference to the original image that was reviewed. Adding this reference as source, there is no need to review it again. You can take a look at Image:David Yow-6cut.jpg and see what I had done. For any more questions, I'm available to help. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 23:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

It' ok ! Thank you very much :) Xic667 (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

copyright violations

How do I add pictures without getting a copyright violation!?--Bobo44 (talk) 00:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Just add free images. You had uploaded copyrighted images with comic characters, for example, which isn't accepted on Commons. English language Wikipedia accepts those images as for illustration of a critical review. Commons is meant to be a place for free images. Fair use images aren't free, so there is no place for them here. Maybe in Wikipedia. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 00:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

See Commons:Licensing#Checklist--Sdrtirs (talk) 00:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:CircuitPeople.jpg

This image was recently marked as a copyright viloation, apparently by you. If your concern is the PCB design shown in the screen shot, then please see the website for the MintyBoost project and verify that it provided under the Creative Commons 2.5 license. Per that license, I will give proper attribution to ladyada.net (the source of the gerbers that resulted in the images, which probably isn't covered by the copyright anyway since the images are the result of my own work creating an anti-aliased gerber file renderer). Nonetheless, please look for that attribution when I repost, and if you have any other concerns please give me an opportunity to address them before summarily deleting it again.

Thanks!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Circuitpeople (talk • contribs) 15:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Is this web site you are talking? There is no reference at all any copyright note, so it is presumed to be copyrighted. When the site hasn't described it's copyright status and the owner wants it to be free (see Commons:Licensing first), it has to go through OTRS permission to be stored in Wikimedia OTRS system. If a screenshot from a site that is copyrighted or doesn't say it's copyright status and an email wasn't sent to OTRS, then the image is deleted as copyright violation. When you send the email, please insert {{OTRS pending}} in the image description to avoid the image been deleted. I hope that I had explain it well. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Shironaya.jpg

Olá, percorri as contribuições de um usuário ao dar uma olhada em pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Registros e acabei encontrando o debate de eliminação que abriste. Poderia incluir nele a Image:Kuronaya.jpg, do mesmo uploader, e que parece se tratar de caso semelhante? boas contribuições Lugusto • ※ 21:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

its a shame

but i wont be uploadin images any longer.

the purpose of uploadin images just to ilustrate some articles is the aim of this work of collaboration , anyway i see that this policy is just trying discourage people to improve some wikipedia articles. it's a shame but that's the way it is.--Militancia (talk) 01:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Just don't make copyright violations! That's the only way that images stays here. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gossip Girl title card.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Gossip Girl title card.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

AllynJ (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, misread the tag. Withdrawn. :) AllynJ (talk) 04:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Veterans Memorial Logo

Sdrtirs, Ref: Eden Prairie Veterans Memorial Logo- I have added that I personally created this logo, as a member of this committee and would like it in the public domain.

Did I respond correctly? I am new and Wikipedia and just want to follow the rules and contribute. Thanks, Kevin

Image:Jesaulenko1.jpg, Image:Jesaulenko2.jpg

Could you please explain further why these are listed for deletion? Thanks --Superflewis (talk) 06:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

You uploaded copyrighted images which is not allowed by Commons's rules and they will be deleted. Commons doesn't allow fair use images and these are fair use images, if you want to used them.--Sdrtirs (talk) 06:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Under the acceptable use policy, it says that Images with iconic status or historical importance may be used, and I think these images have somewhat of an 'iconic' status (certainly within Australia). --Superflewis (talk) 07:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image:Plakatdni.jpg

I had any problem choose a licencing. This image is a picture of a poster. I as organizer buy project and sugest of contents. I'd like choos free licence.--S.Czachorowski (talk) 07:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Thinkpad logo.jpg

Hi, I just use this photo only in ThinkPad article only, which I think is properly for this image?--atlaslin (talk) 08:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

ROX logo

What is this about? I provided a link to the thread discussing about the logo and I provided a link to the author page. I don't know anything about polish, but the author (which I contacted by email) told me the clause at the bottom of every page says all his work is released in public domain. Here is the link on the discussion about the logo with the ROX developers (it is not up to date: I received the author name and contacted him by email, but you must wait the digest period to see the following messages), there is no much I can do... --NicolaFontana (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

The picture was a composition my own and was totally committed to public domain However I filled out the form incorrectly and so I replaced the pix with one in the Wiki commons public domain database

it is a better pix anyway.

Thanks for the input Geof Grant

Image Tagging Image:NGC 1850.jpg

Image copyright now in place on ESO website: http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/copyright.html

Lars Lindberg Christensen (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Obrigado

Caro Sdrtirs Obrigado pelas suas orientações! (E eu falando em inglês com um brasileiro...!) Dessa vez acho que a página http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_Lapa_Azul engrena de fato. Só gostaria de encontrar alguém para validar as informações constantes na página.

Forte abraço! =Durval Jr. (talk) 22:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Durval Jr.

De nada! Bom, razão que falei em inglês foi para que outros que não falassem português tivessem acesso à informação para evitar que as imagens fossem eliminadas e de você ser bloqueado por vandalismo. É claro que em português nos entendemos bem, mas já tinha notado que outros estavam atentos e colocaram dúvidas sobre as suas imagens. Daí, recorrendo ao inglês, estava a transmitir informação para dois lados, para você e para outros interessados ou que colocassem dúvidas sobre as imagens, assim já podiam ter acesso às conversas. Digamos que foi por um duplo motivo: informar e proteger. Bom, fico contente que pude ajudar! Para mais questões, deixe-me uma mensagem, que tentarei responder o mais rápido possível. Boas edições! Cumprimentos, Sdrtirs (talk) 00:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Adding permission link to images

Hi - thanks for your help...I have now added the permissions on all the images uploaded in the past couple of days.

Regards,

Lars Lindberg Christensen (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

PolishPresidentCopyright

Please note, that English version of this page does not specify GFDL license: that's why unofficial English translation is given. A.J. (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

You have marked our company's logo as not our own.

I have uploaded our company's logo at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Avadirect and you have marked it for deletion. We created this logo and we wanted it available for free use. Please stop flagging this as not fair use.

{{EBI License}} and Image:PDB 1bh5 EBI.jpg

Hello, can you please check out the updated tagging of the image and template above and let me know if it is satisfactory. Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Super, thanks much... Cheers, 63.196.132.64 23:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

{{EBI License}}

EBI flatly says anyone may freely use their work for any purpose. That looks like a quasi-public domain grant to me. What am I missing? -Nard the Bard 18:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:20080923223131!Juliette-b-people-international-gabriel-moginot.jpg

Sorry, I made a mistake with that picture... and I was not supposed to upload it. I'm going to ask for a speedy deletion. Steff (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion

Dear Sdrtirs,

i've noticed your message. Sorry, i got some problems with Wikipedia, about what professional artist (i'm a fashion photographer) can or cannot do with their own photos inside articles, because nothing is clearly written inside the Wikipedia notice (except few blurred advices). So i thought first to find a friendly issue, but it doesn't work. Then i am currently thinking about calling my lawyer. But before that i've tryed to put my photo credit inside the picture (as you noticed it), to avoid a legal problem.

Anyway, my request is : can you please definitely delete all the pictures i uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

If i find an issue with Wikipedia i'll upload it again soon.

Many thanks. Gabriel. --Gabriel Moginot (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

---

Dear Sdrtirs,

I've created a deletion page here : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_uploaded_by_user_Gabriel_Moginot

I'm not sure if it's well made, can you take a look please ? Do you know if this request will be fulfill soon or if it takes time ?

Many thanks for your help. Gabriel. --Gabriel Moginot (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mizuwiki.png

Not fair-use image. (Source) --낚시맨 (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:Vexilla Hispanica

I have recently sent an e-mail with the original autorisation letter to permissions-es@wikimedia.org. I hope this will be enough in order to normalise the situation. Greetings, --Rodriguillo (talk) 18:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:1w4x.jpg

What's the problem with this image? There's a clear permission at the provided permission page http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Information/termsofuse.html. In particular, at number ten, it is said

The EBI itself places no restrictions on the use or redistribution of the data available via its services.

So, what's the problem? Do you mind something regarding the authorship? The author - Jawahar Swaminathan - is the EBI's head of the EBI's MDS service, so there's no rights of third parties, because Swaminathan is EBI himself. --Giac83 20:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry! I had forgot fixing this image.--Sdrtirs (talk) 00:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --Giac83 17:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Aucune violation de copyright

Aucune violation de copyright sur les bouteilles, svp contactez la cave, j'ai toutes les autorisation + bénédiction ;-)

--Jmrosier (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

ok, je pars en recherche d'une telle preuve... je l'aurai bientot, mais que vous faut-il ? --Jmrosier (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Come up for air please

Hey!

I noticed your going through my previous images and marking deletions, which is great! Commons is a community edited resource, and we need people to make sure it stays within the bounds of scope. Problem is, the last two you placed on my profile were not valid. Image:Gaim.svg is not my upload, I just validated the SVG; please notify only the original unloader in those scenarios. Since I work in images that need cleanup, I sometimes work on materials that will later be marked for deletion. These are not my problems.

Secondly, Image:Antena3.png and the derivative Image:Antena3.svg have been marked with the Template:trademarked. This means that the images is considered generic enough not to be considered copyrightable. If you have concerns, use Template:delete, not go directly to Template:copyvio. That is only for obvious cases of infringement. I've converted the copyvio on Image:Antena3.svg to a delete to allow the community to decide the fate of that file.

In short, keep up the good work! But, please look bit harder before you leap!

Thanks!

MozillaMan_(talk) 22:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Logos are permitted if they asserts in PD-textlogo, when they only consists of simple geometric shapes and text. They do not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and are therefore public domain. In this case, there is originality, so it isn't public domain, copyrighted. If this logo doesn't have permission for copyright owner, it's a copyright violation and it must be deleted! Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 22:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Still, that's not a judgment call I would personally like to be responsible for, which is why going through the deletion requests channel is a good thing. (also, it is three simple geometric shapes, on an orange background, so I think it still might fall under that...) --MozillaMan_(talk) 23:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

FYI, I had notify the original uploaders too.--Sdrtirs (talk) 22:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Great! --MozillaMan_(talk) 23:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I had notified the original uploaders when I notified you.--Sdrtirs (talk) 09:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Request to undelete Image:Cal Hep B Free Logo.png

I am the original creator of the Cal Hep B Free logo. It is a derivative of the San Francisco Hep B Free logo which I have had permission to replicate specifically from the San Francisco Hep B Free Steering Group. The usage of "Cal" and "UC Berkeley" in the logo has been approved by the University of California, Berkeley's Office of Marketing and Buiness Outreach (OMBO). This is not a copyright violation of any sort. We have been publicly using this logo since the beginning of 2008.

Thank you for your understanding.—Preceding unsigned comment added by DenisLam (talk • contribs) 04:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

All requests for undelete content must go through Commons:Undeletion requests.--Sdrtirs (talk) 04:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Unwanted reloading

Hi.

Thanks por your advice. My reloadings was a mistake. Because of this, I would like to make you a question: How can I delete this uhnwanted uploading. Thanks for your time--Juanfa61 (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bomenpark Meijhorst, Nijmegen (Gld, NL).jpg

Hello, I made a notice that this is not copyright violation, because I designed the map myself. What is going to happen next? Is it you who retires the copyviotag or someone else? Havang(nl) (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Are you the copyright owner of the logo? Even if you create it, it doesn't mean that you own the logo copyrights. If you own the copyright of the logo, then please send a permission to OTRS. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 02:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

You have removing a speedydelete tag referred to a logo in a map. Although the uploader said that he created by itself the map, it doesn't mean that the uploader is copyright owner of the logo due to, like it's said in the tag, Recreating a logo yourself does not give you the right to license it under a free license, and fair use claims are not allowed on Commons. So be careful with the removal of tags and try to search information before your actions. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 02:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I hadn't actually seen the logo in the upper right. But as you didn't explain the meaning of your contribution, I haven't any information before my action. And personally I wouldn't speedy delete this image. Please use Commons:Deletion requests. Cheers.--Bapti ✉ 08:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Starting from a working version I have made a new version here Image:Bomenpark Meijhorst, Nijmegen (Gld, NL).jpg and because of "upload complications" also here Image:Bomenpark Meijhorst, Nijmegen (Gld, NL).JPG. Havang(nl) (talk) but this JPG-image was based on a wrong version ; so I asked for speedydelete of that one. The final correct image has jpg but has the copyviotag. I'll wait and see what happens next. Havang(nl) (talk) 10:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Château de Pont-L'Abbé en 1400.jpg

Hello, can you explain me the tag "BadJPEG"; what has to be changed and can I do that myself? Havang(nl) (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Simple: the image can be more efficiently or more accurately for resize purposes and web presentation. That's why. This tag only means that the image should be in other format than the JPEG format. Someone with graphic experience can do that. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC).

Thanks, Havang(nl) (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kawaii docs.jpg

Hi, the documents haven't a copyright because only have public information, I received freely from the Japanese Embassy. Also, I try to take a blurry image only for educative purposes. Thanks. --Taichi (talk) 22:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Freely available to public as public information doesn't mean the copyright is in public domain. You said you received from Japanese Embassy, so, as it looks, the Japanese Government is the copyright owner of those books. Only the copyright owner, not the physical owner, may release them into a free license accepted in Commons. If you wish to use this image as education purpose, upload it at en.wiki, where fair use is accepted, but not in Commons. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

They're brochures, and haven't a copyright; in these brochures haven't marked the C sign or a atribbution of rights. I asked for these, and said that are public documents, because only have the explain of these laws. Well, you win.--Taichi (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Your two messages

• Hi there. You let two messages in my user page. Regarding the first, the link already provided in the description would have take you to the page where the material license is defined (CC 2,0). Anyway, I put it also on the Permission line, so please check if it is all right now.
• For the second message, it is not clear to me to what are you refering specifically, the same image?, if that is the case, please see the map used in the context of the article w:Ethanol fuel in Brazil, is an illustration as any other, only that is originated in a published paper released for use under attribution. I have not ever uploaded text from paper or of any kind in Commons. I will appreciate if you are more explicit regarding this general message. --Mariordo (talk) 14:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

PS: Oops, esqueci de dizer de qual imagem estou falando: Image:Goldemberg 2008 Brazil sugarcane regions 1754-6834-1-6-1 Fig 1.jpg--Mariordo (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:Slovenian currency

Permission sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproduction_of_Slovenian_currency --Andrejj (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Sonia Silvestre y otros problemas

Hola, Sdrtirs. Un poco complicado tu user name pero bueno...

Por lo general, las imagenes que subo son para ilustrar articulos de wikipedia en los cuales he colaborado.

Lamentablemente. en algunos casos, esas imagenes son realizadas en base a fotos reales de mi coleccion personal llevadas a un formato digital con mi camara, la cual es un poco anticuada. A veces tengo acceso a mejores imagenes pero el problema surge a nivel de copyrigth, y no quisiera cometer el error de subir imagenes que puedan ser cuestionadas con esa razón.

El mismo problema de Sonia lo tengo con Image:Transporte1.jpg.

Voy a ver de que forma puedo mejorar la calidad de esas imagenes. De todas formas agradezco tu interés y quiero que sepas que tu preocupacion es también la mía.

Una pregunta. Si subo una imagen en un formato grande, ¿como puedo ajustar (reducir) este tamaño para fines de usarlo en un articulo?

Muchas gracias y un placer saludarte.--Juan 15:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

P:D: Eres muy modesto al considerarte Es1 Nivel de español) en babel. Yo te pondria conservadoramente un tres y, personalmente, un 4 .--Juan 18:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Hola Juan! Respondiendo a tu pregunta, para usar una imagen en un artigo, puedes escribir [[Imagen:Ejemplo.jpg|thumb|La descripción de la imagen]]. La palabra thumb hace que la imagen sea reducida a una menor resolución de acuerdo con las definiciones de cada usuario (lo predeterminado es 180px) y lo que escribieres en la descripción de la imagen aparece abajo como legenda de la imagen. Pero, tu puedes definir una resolución fija adicionando [[Imagen:Ejemplo.jpg|thumb|200px|La descripción de la imagen]]. Atención: si quieres poner una legenda, debes adicionar la palabra thumb para aparecer la legenda. Muchas gracias por tu saludo. Tiene buenas ediciones! Sdrtirs (talk) 07:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Hola, Sdrtirs!

Muchas gracias por la informacion, muy útil y clara.

Hasta luego--Juan 22:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:EnvyNG.png

Hi, I added the license with source. Its GNU GPL v2 is it ok now? Also suggest about Image:EnvyNG logo.png I have added the same comment on its talk page. Thanks -Knownot (talk) 16:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:LagunaCoupé2.jpg

The image come from of the press site of Renault : it's a site specially for public domain !! Ascaron (talk) 20:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

The press site is for public information, i. e., anyone can access the information and view their photos, but unfortunately this doesn't mean that their works copyleft or in the public domain, just only says that it is free to access from other people. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Journalists use this press site to copy the photo and print them into their newspaper. It also use to have informations. It will be strange if journalists can read the informations and cannot use it. Ascaron (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Ontheedge

Lemme check to see if the remaining pictures here are copyright violations: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ontheeedge WhisperToMe (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• EDIT the remaining pictures are probably his. WhisperToMe (talk) 07:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Imagens apagadas.

Eu havia pedido permissao ao autor da imagem, e na proxima vez que for dar avisos como esse eh melhor os fazer na pagina de discussao da wikipedia em portugues. --Santista1982 (talk) 11:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Você não fez indicação de que tinha pedido permissão. Se fizesse, então eu teria lhe dado a indicação de que era necessário enviar uma cópia dessa autorização para o sistema OTRS do Wikimedia Commons. Sdrtirs (talk) 07:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:StarvingToDeathOnAGovernmentClaim.jpg

Hello, I don't agree with your reason to delete the image, so I changed the nomination for speedy deletion to a normal deletion. See Commons:Deletion requests/Image:StarvingToDeathOnAGovernmentClaim.jpg for my opinion. regards, Waylon (talk) 17:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image:GeorgeAbbeyAward.jpg

Hi there - thanks for your note on my talk page. The reason there isn't permission information given is because I couldn't understand the complicated image upload instructions. I created the image and I created and designed the object that is the image's subject so naturally I give permission for it to be used. However I have no website staking a claim or relating me to the image in any way so I don't know what evidence I can provide. 82.132.136.211 19:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Just send an email saying that you are the copyright owner and saying which license you release it. Sdrtirs (talk) 06:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

My uploads

Hi, i know that my previous uploads have been subjected to copyright vio. Actually i didnot understand the Creative Commons Attrb 2.0 or Sharelike before. But now i do. I have just uploaded some images. Could you lpease verify them and let me know if i am uploading correctly licensed images? Sorry for the inconvenience caused. Legolas2186 (talk) 10:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Sdrtirs. Thanks for your tips. I will keep in mind next time. I have uploaded one file File:Mugdhagodse.jpg which is not correctly licensed (from a website), which i didnot see before. Can you please delete it for me? Legolas2186 (talk) 11:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama?

Hi. I am just curious, but what is this edit trying to achieve? What is different about this picture than any of the thousands of other photographs of buildings I have taken and uploaded here? What about the work is derivative, other than of course the architecture? I am not concerned by the {{Fop}} template, just curious as to why it applies in this case when images like this one seem to be OK. Cheers, Mattinbgn/^talk 21:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Brigitte Bardot young.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--—Angr 07:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Navy Pier photo

Are you the owner of a photo of Navy Pier in Chicago taken from the 23rd floor of Lake Point Tower?

Susan G. Pratt 1-15-2009 Goettsch Partners 224 S. Michigan Avenue. Chicago, Il 60604

File:The secret phonecall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martina Nolte (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Br-153.gif

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Br-153.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Br-153.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

ChristianBier (talk) 01:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Please, notify the right uploader, as I'm not the uploader of this image. Sdrtirs (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1 | Archive 2 →