User talk:Romarin2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Romarin2021!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Projet grotte coeur de Lourdes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hospice de France Histoire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thermes de Barbazan histoire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 22:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Informations Kiosque buvette Thermes de Barbazan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

There is no COM:FOP in France. Abzeronow (talk) 22:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrice, in which country did you take this photo? --Túrelio (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Raya Haffar El Hassan February 2019.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Raya Haffar El Hassan February 2019.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Annemiek Van Vleuten Giro Rosa 2019.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Annemiek Van Vleuten Giro Rosa 2019.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:34, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ːBonjour, merci beaucoup pour votre confiance. --Patrice Bon (talk) 10:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cathédrale de Saint-Bertrand

[edit]

Bonsoir et bravo pour l’exhaustivité de tes photos mais pourrais-tu stp faire un tout petit effort quand tu catégorises ? Tout balancer dans la catégorie générale quand il y a près d'une dizaine de catégories sur l'intérieur de la cathédrale, c'est vraiment n'importe quoi. Merci. --Birdie (talk) 23:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Bonjour, merci pour votre message, mais quel genre de catégorie faire ? Sur commons ? je ne sais pas comment faire c'est pour ça... alors maintenant comment tout classer en catégorie ? --Patrice Bon (talk) 12:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ːːBonjour, c'est bon, j'ai compris comment classer par catégorie avec l'aide d'un utilisateur, donc maintenant vous pouvez voir les nouvelles catégorie ici https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Interior_of_the_Cath%C3%A9drale_Notre-Dame_de_Saint-Bertrand-de-Comminges

je suis en cours de rangement, cordialement--Patrice Bon (talk) 01:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Patrice Bon. En ce qui concerne les légendes des catégories sur commons, il ne faut pas oublier que commons est une base unique pour toutes les langues, avec l'anglais en langue privilégiée. Donc, si tu comptes apporter une légende en français comme tu l'as fait sur la catégorie de la cathédrale, il faut l'encadrer par un modèle sous la forme {{fr|la légende}}. Par ailleurs, je n'ai pas compris cette histoire de bouton vert à droite. Où ça ? Quand on est sur quelle page ? Père Igor (talk) 15:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, oui le bouton vert permert de regarder les images en diaporama, sur le téléphone il n'apparait pas, mais sur l'ordinateur oui. J'ai découvert à quoi ça servai récemment, alors je préfère l'indiquer pour les visiteurs..

Il faut encadrer la légende ? quelle catégorie ? je ne comprend pas, merci pour votre aide--Patrice Bon (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Merci, j'ai compris ː)--Patrice Bon (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tant mieux parce que moi, je ne comprends toujours pas où se trouve ce bouton vert (sur l'ordinateur ?). Pour les légendes, il serait bon que tu les reprenne pour les mettre en forme suivant le modèle indiqué. Et si tu es doué pour d'autres langues, tu peux également les indiquer de manière similaire ({{en|en anglais}}, {{de|en allemand}}, {{es|en espagnol}}), etc.). Père Igor (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, oui, j'ai mise à jour toute les légendes de mes photos, car en envoyant les fichiers j'avais tout mis avec " intérieur " dans les légende... Par exemple sur cette page Média dans la catégorie « Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Saint-Bertrand-de-Comminges » le bouton vert est à droite. cordialement--Patrice Bon (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne vois toujours aucun bouton vert, ni )à droite, ni à gauche ,ni en bas, ni en haut, sur la page Category:Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Saint-Bertrand-de-Comminges. Mystère ! Père Igor (talk) 11:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je viens de faire un sreenshot de l'écran et j'ai entourer le bouton vert sur la page voici l'image--Patrice Bon (talk) 13:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ce que tu vois n'est absolument pas ce que je vois. Pourrait-il s'agir d'une préférence que tu as cochée ? Comment fais-tu une capture d'écran à partir de commons ? Père Igor (talk) 11:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je pense que j'ai une version de wikipédia par defaut, dans les préférences, je vois ː dans Apparence ː Habillage ː Vector ; Utiliser l’ancienne version de Vector (oui) ; Afficher les catégories cachées (oui) ; Afficher les libellés, alias et descriptions dans toutes mes langues au chargement des pages (oui) ; Dans Gadgets je vois ː Navigation améliorée ː Slideshow (oui) ; ZoomViewer (oui) ; CollapsibleTemplates (oui) ; FastCCI (oui). Pour faire une capture d'écran, j'utilise la touche imprim écran de l'ordinateur, ensuite je coche sélection pour la zone que je veux choisir d'imprimer en image et d'enregistrer. J'espère que ça pourra vous aider.--Patrice Bon (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mon habillage est en JavaScript et je n'ai coché aucun des gadgets que tu cites. C'est ce que supposais : ça doit venir du gadget Slideshow. Et donc, dans l'explication de tes catégories, tu indiques une information dont nombre de wikipédiens ne peuvent pas se servir et de plus, aucun lecteur non enregistré ne peut également la comprendre. Je pense que ce serait bien que tu abandonnes cette précision, et que tu la supprimes sur toutes les catégories où tu l'as indiquée. Pour l'impression d'écran, ça ne marche avec sur mon micro-ordinateur. Père Igor (talk) 11:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oui ça vient de Slideshow. D'accord, donc ce que je vois, les personnes non enregistrer ne le vois pas ?...
Je viens d'essayer sur un autre ordinateur avec firefox et Chromium en n'étant pas connecter à wikipédia et commons, et bien je vois toujours le bouton vert permettant de regarder les photos avec " Slideshow ", donc c'est une option intégrer à la version normale.
Je pense que comme sur smarphone, le micro ordinateur n'affiche pas comme d'habitude, comme sur les ordinateurs normaux. Je vais laisser l'écris parce que je l'ai découvert assez tard, alors c'est mieux de l'indiquer aux visiteurs au lieu de les laisser dans l'ignirance--Patrice Bon (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Je viens de vérifier en étant déconnecté, j'ai effectivement vu le fameux bouton vert qui indique Category Slideshow quand je passe le curseur de la souris dessus. Je comprends enfin ton ajout. Père Igor (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cathédrale de la Major de Marseille - Juin 1993 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ecritures (talk) 22:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 12:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MIM (musée) Musée des minéraux, fossiles - Beyrouth 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 23:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Traumrune (talk) 21:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]