User talk:PierreSelim/Archives/4

I will often respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.
If I wrote on your page, I am watching it, so replying there is probably best.

Archives
(2009/05 - 2011/07) (2012/05 - 2012/11) (2013/04 - 2014/06) (2015/09 - 2016/02) (2016/07 - 2016/11) (2017/05 - 2017/??)	(2011/07 - 2012/05) (2012/11 - 2013/04) (2014/06 - 2015/09) (2016/02 - 2016/07) (2016/11 - 2017/05)

Merci !

Merci de me prévenir : je n'avais pas vu la page. J'y suis en bonne compagnie et ceux qui me précèdent le méritent  ! -- C'était la seule photo que j'avais soumise au concours, mon activité sur Commons étant, à mon sens, plus quantitative que qualitative ! -- Je suis toujours tes participations avec intérêt et tes photos de rugby sont d'un connaisseur. (Charentais, je n'ai jamais pratiqué ce sport mais, depuis des années, je n'utilise guère ma TV que pour regarder les matchs de rugby...) -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>) 11:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Pierre Selim, permets-moi de me joindre au merci de JLPC pour le mien :) Même si j'ai encore l'impression d'être en phase d'apprentissage vis-à-vis de vous deux. Vos photos que je vois passer sont toujours d'une qualité impressionnante! A bientôt! --Selbymay (<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>) 14:11, 2 November

RdV raté

Je me demandais si tu ouvrais de temps en temps tes Emails? J'aurai plus vite fait de t'écrire ici...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci

Bonjour Pierre, Merci pour ton message et l'invitation à la cérémonie de remise des prix. J’espère y participer, avec grand plaisir d'y rencontrer beaucoup de monde, que je ne connais pour l'instant, qu'à travers l'écran :-) A bientôt --Moonik (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs RM92 - 2012-11-01 - Yoann Huget-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The pic could be a tad brighter. Jastrow 10:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Un chti coup de balais

Salut !

Category:André Franquenelle, c'est une erreur de ma part. Udufruduhu (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

PS: il serait temps d'archiver cette page, elle est devenu un peu trop grosse. Udufruduhu (talk) 15:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci ça c'est du service rapide . Udufruduhu (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Prix , à quand les détails?

Bonjour, je viens de lire ton message sur le Prix WLM France. J'habite les Pays-Bas, j'ai fait les photo's pendant mes randonnées en vélo en France. Mais petit problème: comment faire pour le 30 novembre... ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Rebonjour. Pour plus de détail, je peux te recontacter sur ta PDD .... À quand les détails? --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Pour information: C'est reglé, je viens le 30 novembre. --Havang(nl) (talk) 19:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Petit rappel

Bonjour,

comme vous m'avez conseillé de le faire, je vous fais un rappel sur les autorisations OTRS : ça fait une semaine environ que j'ai mis en ligne la dernière fournée de photos par Georges Biard et il y a une grosse trentaine d'images qui attendent toujours que leur autorisation soit validée. J'ai bien retenu ce qu'on m'a dit sur les délais mais je ne peux pas m'empêcher d'être un peu nerveux car certaines figurent sur des articles très fréquentés, comme celui de Tal. Il y a aussi de quoi faire une jolie galerie photos pour l'article salon du chocolat, mais j'attends les autorisations pour ça. (NB : deux emails ont été envoyés, l'un concernait quatre ou cinq photos, et l'autre, envoyée plusieurs jours plus tard, reprenait les url du premier message pas encore traitées, avec une bonne vingtaine d'images en plus) Merci ! cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 09:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci, j'ai fait le premier lot de 5 images du ticket:2012010510013998 (je mets le liens ici histoire de pas avoir à chercher). J'essaye de finir ça ajourd'hui. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Super, merci. Je préviens très à l'avance, mais au moment du festival de Cannes, ou de la cérémonie des César s'il y va cette année, il faudra se préparer, parce que ça risque d'être difficile à suivre : s'il est aussi productif que d'habitude, ça peut donner plusieurs dizaines de photos à mettre d'un coup en quelques jours. (voir ce que ça a donné cette année pour les César, pour Cannes ou pour Deauville - la grosse majorité des photos de Cannes et de Deauville, et presque toutes celles des César, sont de lui). cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 10:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello ; je me permets juste de refaire un rappel, car vous avez du avoir autre chose en tête : il reste encore une bonne dizaine d'autorisations à valider (je fais cette petite piqûre de rappel car il est possible que j'en mette d'autres sous peu et je ne voudrais pas que vous soyez pris de court ni submergé). cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 11:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

A priori c'est fait maintenant, j'ai préciser sur les photos du salon du chocolat que la permission venait du photographe. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:50, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Super. Merci beaucoup et pardon pour les relances à répétition. JJ Georges (talk) 10:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Doublon photos Stade Toulousain vs MHR

Bonjour Pierre,

Voulant illustrer par des images des "infobox" de pages WP, notamment celle de Pierre Bérard et de Santiago Fernandez, j'ai importé, par erreur, une poignée de tes photos de l'album "Stade Toulousain vs MHR" sur Flickr, ignorant que tu avais importé, carrément, tout l'album sur Commons. Ce n'est pas très grave, mais je voulais te le dire... Les photos, rebaptisées, sont dans [Category:Current players of Montpellier HR], si tu estimes qu'il faut absolument les supprimer, auquel cas, il faudra que j'utilise celles que tu as importées pour illustrer à nouveau les pages WP... Cela dit, d'habitude le logiciel "uploadwizard" prévient lorsque le fichier existe déjà, mais là, non... Bonne soirée. --34 super héros (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Demande

Bonjour,

suite à cette discussion que vous avez peut-être vue, je viens, avec l'accord de l'auteur et de la personne photographiée, d'uploader une nouvelle version de cette photo. Or, la nouvelle version ne semble pas encore avoir remplacée l'ancienne... serait-il possible de faire en sorte qu'elle apparaisse correctement ? (pas seulement la taille, qui a déjà été modifiée, mais l'image qui est différente. Si ça se trouve, le changement sera visible quand vous lirez ce message)

Quand ce sera fait, cela me rendrait vraiment service si vous pouviez faire plusieurs choses : 1) approuver en priorité le ticket OTRS pour la nouvelle version : j'ai envoyé le formulaire à Georges Biard, je pense qu'il l'aura renvoyé d'ici ce soir ou demain 2) si possible, et à titre exceptionnel, purger l'historique de File:Sylvie Vartan Cabourg 2011.jpg pour que seule la nouvelle version soit visible (ça a l'air d'une requête assez incongrue mais je peux vous expliquer par mail de quoi il retourne... c'est un cas assez particulier) 3) vérifier si le ticket OTRS de cette autre photo est bien arrivé et, si oui, le valider de toute urgenge.

Voilà, merci beaucoup si vous pouvez faire tout ça ; ça aiderait à résoudre un imbroglio dont je peux vous expliquer les tenants et les aboutissants si vous le souhaitez.

cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 08:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Ne pas se précipiter pour masquer l'ancienne version, CU en cours. Mais ok pour validation rapide des OTRS, ça sera fait. Merci. ----MGuf (d) 12:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

J'ai répondu sur OTRS, rajouté les autorisations sur les photos, j'attends le résultat du CU. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Voir mes commentaires sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sylvie Vartan Cabourg 2011.jpg. J'ai pris la peine de téléphoner à Philippe Quaisse sur le téléphone disponible sur son site officiel et il m'a confirmé être l'auteur de cette photo, l'avoir lui-même mise sur commons et avoir envoyé son autorisation. (quel cirque, cette histoire !) cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Mr PierreSelim, je ne comprends pas que vous ne trouviez pas le mail :s peut être puis je vous envoyer la confirmation d'envoi que m'a envoyé l'auteur ? est ce que je l'envoie à otrs directement ou bien à vous (et dans ce cas de quelle manière?) ? Merci beaucoup à vous d'avoir fait le nécessaire pour l'autre photo. Merci de votre réponse. Bien cordialement--Mytsie (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour ; le mail n'est toujours pas arrivé ??? Parce que l'auteur m'a confirmé hier au téléphone l'avoir envoyé... Comment les mails peuvent-ils ne pas apparaître ? (je demande pour savoir, car je n'en ai aucune idée, et aussi parce que je pense que ce serait bien pour tout le monde que cette histoire se termine vraiment...) cordialement JJ Georges (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour. Je me suis permise de transférer (à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org) le mail que m'a adressé l'auteur de la photo pour me faire part du fait que son autorisation était bien partie... Comme nous avons souffert de beaucoup de discrédit, c'est vrai que j'espère que cette histoire va pouvoir se terminer rapidement :) merci de votre aide.. ----mytsie

Bonjour j'ai retrouvé l'email, par contre j'ai pas pu vérifié l'identité de l’émetteur. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, désolée je ne comprends pas... Comment vous prouver autrement l'identité de l'émetteur qu'en le faisant vous écrire? Merci de votre aide... Bon dimanche ----mytsie

Une réponse a été faite par email. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Ah très bien merci. C'est donc l'auteur qui l'a reçue, j'espère qu'il l'a lira vite :) ----mytsie

 Done La permission a pu être validé ce matin, j'ai fermé la demande de suppression qui n'a plus de sens du coup. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup à vous! :) très bonne semaine!--Mytsie (talk) 13:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

commons

Bonjours, pourquoi avec vous supprimé toutes mes images que j'ai mis sur commons ?? si c'est une question de droit d'image j'avoue qu'il y a quelques photos que j'avais pris sur des sites (j'avoue), mais il y en a plein que j'ai pris moi-même avec un appareil photo, et que vous avez quand même supprimé, il n'y a pas besoin de droit d'auteur quand c'est moi qui prend la photo ! En plus vous avez mis la cause de suppression de toutes les photos "violation de photos pris sur streetview, google..." alors que certaines des photos je l'ai avait pris moi même (avec un appareil) 92.138.175.113 19:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Thibaut Pinot - TDF 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thibaut Pinot - TDF 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Maintenon(s) le niveau

Bonjour Pierre-Selim,

+1 en effet, en attendant le prix au niveau interplanétaire :) Bravo à toi pour ton élection du weekend!

--Selbymay (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

besoin d'aide

Bonjour. A la demande d'un contributeur néerlandais qui a publié de nombreuses pages sur des illustrateurs français (XIXe-début XXe), je vais télécharger quelques ressources depuis Gallica (affiches de café-concerts et illustrations de partitions). J'ai un petit souci avec les catégories. Une catégorie que j'avais créée semble avoir été effacée : il s'agit de la catégorie du dessinateur Faria (vous pouvez la voir sur cette image : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_Violon_bris%C3%A9_%28couverture_du_petit_format,_1885%29.jpg). Pourriez-vous m'expliquer les raisons ? Merci d'avance. Cordialement --Eliane Daphy (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Pour info

J'ai mis la semaine dernière une petite fournée de photos de Georges Biard (Céline Dion, Guy Béart - qui n'avait pas encore sa photo -, Johnny Hallyday et quelques autres). Merci d'avance ! cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, PierreSelim/Archives. You have new messages at MaybeMaybeMaybe's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fæ (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de la Trinité - 2012-09-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment background disturbing, but acceptable. QI for me --Rjcastillo 17:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikiwatcher1

Wikiwatcher1 (talk · contribs)

This user uploaded File:Gertrude Michael - publicity.jpg as if it were taken in 1930s. There is no proof that this photo is out of copyright yet. He has been blocked before, and he's been investigated in en:WP:Contributor copyright investigations/Wikiwatcher1. What are you going to do? --George Ho (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

I've already did what I could in August, now if after all the discussions done about his upload he can't understand, I suggest you take the problem to the User problem noticeboard. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Banzaï Bonsaï !

Bonsoir PierreSelim, Ô Toi l'Elu.

Je me suis permis quelques interventions de tous ordres sur ton bonsaï, tu verras mes modifs dans le petit cartouche de la vignette en bas.

J'en ai profité pour demander un renommage...

Naturellement, c'est ton image, et donc sens-toi libre de revenir à la version antérieure si ça ne te convient pas, je ne serai qu'un tout petit peu vexé, ça passera, et je ne m'en souviendrai qu'au moment de renouveler ton mandat de membre du CA.

Tu sais quoi ? J'ai déjà deux candidats en cours en "FP" donc je suis coincé pour l'instant, mais sinon, j'aurais proposé cette photo, c'est vraiment de la graine (si j'ose dire) d'Image Remarquable ! (selon moi).

Bon, compte tenu de mon intervention, j'estime que je ne peux plus voter  Support en QI, mais je vais leur mettre la pression !

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Merci pour l'amélioration, pour la FPC je vais y songer, (j'ai 0 candidat dans les cartons donc c'est bon ^_^) --PierreSelim (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

:apologies

si, bien sûr, avec l'espoir que le resultat va etre comme Grenoble en 1997 ou Rome en 2011, bien que ça sera trés difficile. Mais je crois que Jacques Brunes va travailler bien avec l'équipe d'Italie. De toute façon nous avons remporté notre meilleur resultats avec des entraineurs français comme Pierre Villepreux ou Mitou Fourcade... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
PS A propos, mais pourquoi en fr.wiki les catégories sont "Joueur français de rugby à XV" et pas "Joueurs"?

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vincent Clerc (8021453915).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI despite the difficult light conditions. --JLPC 18:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antoine Maurice - 2012-12-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louis Picamoles (8021442149) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI Poco a poco 11:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta - B752 - N649DL at DCA - 2012-07-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sciurus carolinensis - Washington Mall - 2012-07-06 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BBG - Ficus deltoidea - Literati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BBG - Carissa macrocarpa var. Horizontalis - Cascade by Frank Okamura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I've corrected the tilt, and added some slight improvements, therefore I think I cannot vote anymore, but I think it is a very good QI.--Jebulon 18:43, 17 December 2012 (UTC) Indeed.--ArildV 18:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica Saint-Sernin - Simon Magus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sciurus carolinensis - Washington Mall - 2012-07-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Kadellar 20:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North transepts - Basilique Saint-Sernin - fixed perspective (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 14:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:BBG - Carissa macrocarpa var. Horizontalis - Cascade by Frank Okamura.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:BBG - Carissa macrocarpa var. Horizontalis - Cascade by Frank Okamura.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pégase tenu par la Renommée de la Guerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality & nice point of view (or better I should say :) --Selbymay 11:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Francisque Duret - Saint-Michel terrassant le démon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 22:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capsicum annuum var. Petit carré de Nice - MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Functions in Excel.PNG

It is my understanding that this file has been retained per the deletion discussion on its Talk page. If I am mistaken, please advise further. Brews ohare (talk) 14:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Well KoH did an unconsensual admin actions ... but it's blatant copyvio. Most screenshots like this one are under fair-use on Wikipedia EN, and I would suggest to do the same with this one. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs RM92 - 2012-11-01 - Yoann Huget-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs CAB - 15h25.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promenade du Peyrou - 2012-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Taxiarchos228 13:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faculté de médecine de Montpellier - 2012-08-26 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:01, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faculté de médecine de Montpellier - 2012-08-26 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:10, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de Louis XIV - Place Royale à Montpellier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Otto Dix- Gas attack

I see you have put the image of Otto Dix up for deletion. Is there a particular reason? I have used this in an article on the Western Front and it seems wholly appropriate.

Weglinde (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

I believe you are mistaking, I've nominated a picture of a statue by Paul Landowski because the statue was still copyrighted here Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morocco 1.JPG. If you are refering to this deletion request, you should probably ask the nominator P. S. Burton. Best wishes for 2013. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

With thanks for your support and the pleasant co-operation in the past year, I wish you all the best in the new year! --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonne année 2013

Bonsoir Pierre

Tous mes vœux pour l'année 2013 ! –

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Meilleurs vœux

Bonjour, Pierre. Nous nous sommes croisés le 30 novembre à Paris et je t'ai serré la main en te parlant de tes photos. J'ai juste oublié une chose, bien que tu en aies parlé devant moi ce soir-là : mes remerciements pour ton travail dans l'organisation et les choix, lors du concours WLM. Je profite donc de l'occasion pour te remercier : sans toi et quelques autres pas de concours, donc pas de cérémonie et pas de possibilité de rencontrer quelques-uns de ceux que l'on côtoie souvent sur les pages de Commons. J'en profite pour te souhaiter une très bonne année 2013, en espérant que, outre divers sujets intéressants, tu récolteras beaucoup de beaux essais du Stade au bout de ton téléobjectif ! -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 10:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Biard

Bonjour,

J'ai fait passer à Georges Biard un formulaire à renvoyer. J'ai mis en n° de ticket Ticket#2013010510013998 : c'est bon, ou il faut que je change de numéro pour les prochains envois de 2013 ? cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

 Done Non a priori on peut garder l'ancien (il commence à être bien rempli il est vrai ^_^).--PierreSelim (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok, merci : c'est juste que je ne connais rien à la manière dont fonctionne cette histoire de ticket OTRS. JJ Georges (talk) 09:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Il faudra juste me dire quand le ticket à utiliser aura changé. JJ Georges (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Logo stade français

Salut PierreSelim,

Comme tu avais participé à Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo-SFP-Stade-Français-Paris-Rugby.png, je te signale que le logo a été de nouveau importé et est de nouveau en discussion pour une suppression : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stade Francais logo.png. Udufruduhu (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Tu veux pas donner ton avis ? Udufruduhu (talk) 09:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Please undelete

Check this. These images you deleted after Gunnex’s misguided and hasty copyvio accusation are almost certainly uploaded by the author himself. Please restore for history and categories, rastore their usage in project pages, and lets discuss it. The author needs to be trained about contributing not accused of copyright theft. -- Tuválkin ✉ 14:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, sorry I haven't done all the check I should have, I'm so used to find copyvios of sport pictures. I let you deal with the user and explain him what to do, our goals, our Licensing policy, especially he seems interested in self-promotion. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Can you restore File:Cândido Barbosa.jpg, please, then? I am convinced he’s genuine and feel it is better to give him seven days for OTRS. See some more discussion at Gunnex’s talk page. -- Tuválkin ✉ 10:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sturnus vulgaris - Toulouse - 2013-01-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs Benetton Rugby - 2013-01-13 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Remarkable noise, slight unsharpness, but OK for sports. --Tuxyso 22:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frederic Michalak - 2012-09-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Attribution

Bonjour,

J'avais uploadé cette photo il y a longtemps, avec l'accord de son auteur, quand je ne maîtrisais pas encore 100% des pratiques sur commons. J'y ai repensé récemment et comme ça m'embêtait de rester crédité pour la photo, j'ai demandé à l'auteur - Jean-Paul Oury - s'il pouvait renvoyer un formulaire OTRS ad hoc et il me dit qu'il vient de le faire. Il faudrait valider l'autorisation, pour que la photo soit - enfin - correctement attribuée. Merci beaucoup, cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 16:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour, juste pour être sûr : il a bien renvoyé le formulaire ? (je suis toujours un peu parano dans ces cas-là ?) cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 12:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

 Done--PierreSelim (talk) 06:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Merci. Ca faisait un certain temps que ce truc me gênait. JJ Georges (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

A toutes fins utiles, je précise que les (rares) autres photos que j'ai postées sur commons en mon nom propre ont bel et bien été prises par moi (ce qui permet de se rendre compte de mon non-talent de photographe ). Il n'y avait que celle-ci qui présentait un problème : je l'avais postée moi-même parce que l'utilisation de l'interface semblait poser des soucis à son auteur. JJ Georges (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rempart médiéval de Toulouse - 2013-01-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:41, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Épave Big Tub Harbour 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Regarding Lakshman Namal Rajapaksa.jpg

Please Explain me why you deleted http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Lakshman_Namal_Rajapaksa.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 from Commons,Though the Flicker account associated with this image is blacklisted,for some reason,this particular photograph is not a Flicker wash, below given the link to some of his other photographs in Wikimedia Commons - What are you going to do for those then ? Indi is not a Cheap Chap to post other people's garbage in his account.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=250&offset=0&redirs=1&profile=default&search=indi+samarajiva
Thanks :) MediaJet (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflower - Toulouse - 2012-09-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 02:06, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs Benetton Rugby - 2013-01-13 - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit brighter, but QI anyway. --JLPC 19:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflower - Toulouse - 2012-09-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:North transepts - Basilique Saint-Sernin - fixed perspective (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:North transepts - Basilique Saint-Sernin - fixed perspective (cropped).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your help pls

Hi Pierre. Can you help me with a French-speaking user I'm having a problem with? The user is user:Parent Géry. He's been doing 100s of rename requests without the number parameter, filling up the incomplete rename requests cat. He also gives names that are already in use or that have a sequence number already in use. I've tried to explain this to him on his talk: User talk:Parent Géry#Rename requests (at bottom). I told him others shouldn't have to fix or complete his requests, but he seems to have a long history of ignoring these concerns and warnings, even in French: User talk:Parent Géry#Incomplete rename requests. He continues the behavior and ignores my messages and instructions on how to fix the issue. This has involved more than 100 rename requests over the past couple days, and many others in the past according to his talk. I've blocked him temporarily, but please feel free to remove this at your discretion. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 09:24, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi again. This user has emailed me expressing the need to have this explained to him in French. There are several new incomplete rename requests in the incomplete cat since his block expired. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 23:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on this. Much appreciated. INeverCry 21:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espoirs Stade toulousain vs Lyon OU (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --A.Savin 10:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espoirs Stade toulousain vs Lyon OU (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JetBlue - Embraer 190 - N266JB - 2012-07-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dice - 1-2-4-5-6 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:32, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MHNT - Crocuta crocuta spelaea - 2011-10-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful & good quality. --Selbymay 12:49, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs Castres olympique - 2012-08-18 - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espoirs Stade toulousain vs Lyon OU (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toulouse - Quai de la Daurade - 2013-01-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espoirs Stade toulousain vs Lyon OU (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

PàS

Salut,

Tu voudrais pas donner ton avis sur fr:Discussion:Liste des matchs de l'équipe de France de rugby à XV par adversaire/Suppression et fr:Discussion:Rugby club de Montréal/Suppression ? Merci, Udufruduhu (talk) 08:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Ben finalement non...

Salut. Je te remercie de ta confiance, et d'avoir pensé à moi pour le balai. Finalement, je laisse tomber, c'est vrai que j'ai du temps l'hiver, mais en fait je me consacre de plus en plus à une vie hors Wikimedia, et ça sera d'ailleurs de plus en plus le cas à l'avenir. Donc sans moi, désolé, merci. ----MGuf (d) 08:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toulouse - Bazacle - Larus michahellis - 2013-02-17 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs LOU - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --The Photographer 14:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Porte des Comtes - Capitals n04 - Moses, Aaron and Hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Porte des Comtes - Capitals n05 - Moses, Aaron and Hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Bust of Saint Benedict Labre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Arcalino 18:58, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Bust of Saint Agatha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 14:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Bust of Saint Vincent de Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Qualitiy as previous Nomination -- Arcalino 09:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Bust of Margaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint-Sernin - Bust of Saint Phebade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good -- Arcalino 10:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

4e Projet toulousain

Bravo, va voir tes Emails, tu as gagné le concours du 4e projet toulousain! Je te félicite bien vivement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

j'ai vu ça à la pause café tout à l'heure \o/ --PierreSelim (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jean_de_Labadie_by_Emil_Puls.jpg

May I ask what you mean by "Not the same WB"? And where does your "quality is almost never a reason for deletion" come from? "Reasons for deletion" according to Commons:Deletion policy: "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." Why do you think a photo of low quality with misleading title (by Emil Puls) should nevertheless be kept after a first class repro has been uploaded? --Vsop.de (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the version you want to delete is a digitalized photography by a known photograph Emil Puls of the artwork. It's available under free licence, there is no reason to remove it. If you think the version you have uploaded is the best you should try to nominate it as Commons:Valued images for this subject. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I understand, that you do not care for the rules in Commons:Deletion policy. But may I again ask what you meant by "Not the same WB"? --Vsop.de (talk) 15:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

There is no policy to delete files when there is a new one uploaded. Yours has more details but is not of the same color, we generally keep files that are different so the editors of the project can choose which one they need (especially on wikis files are shown with low resolution ~ 180px). Your aggressivity toward me is totally out of line, I'm only a volunteer here. Regards, --PierreSelim (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Problème inattendu.

Nous avons un problème avec cette image TXbaccata.jpg. La légende, en français (c'est pour çà que je l'ai comprise), dit le contraire de la vérité. Le fruit est tout à fais comestible mais la graine est toxique. Je l'ai dis dans la page de discussion mais je crains que se ne soit pas suffisant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foot US - Ours vs Kangourous - 2013-03-02 - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI also in this version. But I think the player in the left foreground is a bit disturbing. Have you tried to crop him out? --Tuxyso 17:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for taking care of File:Steven Lecefel (Rhyl vs Manchester city) jpg.jpg and for the follow up note.--ukexpat (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Formulaire OTRS

Salut ; la semaine dernière j'ai uploadé une grosse trentaine de photos de Georges Biard. Il a du envoyer le formulaire, il faudrait valider les autorisations. Je préfère prévenir parce que ce week-end j'ai cru comprendre qu'il allait aux NRJ Music Awards, donc il risque d'y en avoir une nouvelle fournée la semaine prochaine. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 06:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, juste une petite relance parce que je viens de récupérer ses photos des NRJ Music Awards et je vais les uploader dans les jours qui viennent. Il faudrait déjà valider ceux-ci pour que ça ne s'accumule pas trop. merci, JJ Georges (talk) 22:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Je viens d'uploader les photos des NRJ Awards : il va envoyer incessamment le formulaire, si ce n'est déjà fait. Attention, ça s'accumule ! JJ Georges (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Je viens de traiter 31 fichiers dont nous avions les autorisations. Il doit manquer ta dernière série d'uploads --PierreSelim (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Oui, comme je les ai postés hier, il n'a peut-être pas encore renvoyé le formulaire, mais ça ne saurait tarder. Merci d'avoir traité la première fournée. JJ Georges (talk) 08:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

 Done --PierreSelim (talk) 09:48, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Mazette, quelle rapidité ! Merci. JJ Georges (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

J'ai un outil qui me permet d'aller assez vite une fois que j'ai la liste des fichiers, j'ai qu'à cliquer ^_^ :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

J'aurais besoin qu'une demande de suppression absurde soit vite clôturée, voir ici. Serait-ce possible de vérifier que le ticket est correct (il l'est) et de mettre fin à ce truc ? Merci. JJ Georges (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup. Sinon, pour info, j'ai uploadé une nouvelle fournée d'images ce week-end (déjeuner des nominés en prévision de la cérémonie des César : normalement, on devrait avoir les photos de la cérémonie elle-même à la fin du mois). JJ Georges (talk) 08:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci ! JJ Georges (talk) 09:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Pour info, j'ai encore uploadé plusieurs photos. Je ne sais pas s'il a déjà renvoyé le formulaire à l'heure où j'écris, mais ce sera sans doute le cas d'ici ce soir. J'ignore si c'est utile que je le signale aussi vite ? En tout cas, je passe l'info parce que c'est un assez "petit" formulaire, qui concerne 8 photos seulement. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 10:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done --PierreSelim (talk) 07:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci. J'aurais une question sur cette photo : Georges Biard avait fait une erreur en la titrant "Michel Ocelot", et je l'avais uploadée un peu vite, avant de me rendre compte que ce n'était pas Michel Ocelot. J'ai demandé le renommage de la photo, mais du coup elle a été validée avec le titre Michel Ocelot et, surtout, l'admin qui a fait le renommage a supprimé la redirection. Du coup l'URL ne doit plus être trouvable avec le ticket OTRS. Est-ce que c'est rattrapable ou il vaut mieux que je fasse renvoyer une autorisation pour cette photo, avec la nouvelle URL correcte, lors d'une prochaine fournée ? cordialement JJ Georges (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

J'ai encore mis quelques photos ; le formulaire a dû arriver. J'en ai provité pour faire renvoyer une autorisation pour la photo de Bruno Coulais. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 09:34, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello ; je viens d'envoyer un petit paquet de photos de la cérémonie des César d'hier. Je pense qu'il aura envoyé le formulaire d'ici ce soir. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour ; il a bien renvoyé le formulaire comme d'hab ? cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Suite à une demande assez absurde autour d'une photo (voir ici) j'ai mis trois images en plus et il y aura donc un mini-formulaire à valider en plus de celui des Césars. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Super, merci. JJ Georges (talk) 10:56, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toulouse - Bazacle - Larus michahellis - 2013-02-17 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toulouse - Bazacle - Larus michahellis - 2013-02-17 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Motion blur but after all the bird IS in motion :-) --Kreuzschnabel 17:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toulouse - Bazacle - Larus michahellis - 2013-02-17 - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpening artifacts but OK for me. --Kreuzschnabel 17:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs Union Bordeaux-Bègles - 2013-03-09 - Blair Connor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Jastrow 20:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs Union Bordeaux-Bègles - 2013-03-09 - Blair Connor-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs Union Bordeaux-Bègles - 2013-03-09 - Charles Brousse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 10:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Akan

Pierre peux-tu regarder ma page de discussion, à la fin, rubrique ethnologie. J'ai demandé, pour ce lancement, l'avis de mes complices habituels qui disent (comme toujours) de choses sensées et utiles. Sans refaire un modèle peut-on adapter l'actuel? Merci de ton avis --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

• Merci de ce que tu pourras faire. Tes photos ont un grand mérite elles sont justes. Les miennes non; j'ai eu un problème avec l’empilement j'ai fais des tranches trop fines et... il en manque. Je referai certaines images vraiment trop raté. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Final Challenge international de Paris 2013-01-26 193155.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Final Challenge international de Paris 2013-01-26 193155.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smithsonian American Art Museum - Third floor mezzanine - 2012-07-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Number of uploads

Hi there! Thanks for closing the discussion. I have a question. Is there a way to see the number of files that a particular user has uploaded to Commons? I'd like like to know how many files I have uploaded so far. Thanks! Nataev (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hi! I helped a lady draft and and send an E-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with three photos of the Uzbek actress Sitora Farmonova attached. She also send the E-mail to me. Will ORTS members upload the photos themselves? If yes, how will I find out when they do? Or can I go ahead and upload them? I'n not sure if ORTS volunteers will locate the photos if I upload them myself. Because the photos in the E-mail are not named properly, they're right from the camera. Thanks! Nataev (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monument 2013

Bonsoir,

très touché d'être sollicité pour participer à l'organisation de W.L.M.2013. Je suis plus que partant pour contribuer à mon modeste niveau au succès de cette entreprise. Les travaux préparatoires sont surement déjà lancés. Si j'ai déjà essayé de localiser un certain nombre de m.h. dans les listes ad-hoc et verser quelques photos supplémentaires je ne doute pas que beaucoup d'autres facettes du travail d'organisation m'échappent. Si j'ai déjà rencontré Vigneron, je ne connais ni Jean-Frédéric ni toi. Même si j'habite dans le far-ouest, je monte de temps à autres à la Capitale et suis tout disposé à rencontrer les éventuels parisiens en charge de l'organisation de W.L.M.2013. J'y serai d'ailleurs du 06 au 09/04/2013. J'attends de tes nouvelles pour savoir en quoi je puis être utile. Très cordialement.--GO69 (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foot US - Ours vs Kangourous - 2013-03-02 - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, perfect focus on the ball.--ArildV 23:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frédéric Michalak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capital of Original sin and Capital of the lions - Porte Miègeville - Basilica of Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Chiesa della Salute

Hallo Pierre, thanks for your appreciation of this image on FP. I'm not sure if you mean with your comment the left or the right part of the image because the "disturbing" foreground is on the right unless you mean the bright arched windows of the building on the left. I tried to crop both and all the combinations but I still think that the actual version is the most natural (thats how the picture was taken). Best regards and many thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Francis Fainifo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Masonic Lodge poster.JPG

Pierre, what was at issue was whether or not the images were substantially altered (or not), whether EBay is an acceptable source website for images (or not), and whether or not they were in scope. I don't think you should have closed the discussion, as those issues were not entirely resolved. MSJapan (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry there is no modification except a crop and during image black and white on the so called altered version. There is no problem of copyright here (the description is so minimal it cannot be copyrighted) and the image is in PD. The image is from the LOC and is clearly in scope as historical artifact, What more do you want to discuss ? A discussion on use of EBay as a source, you'll get more insight if you ask the village pump. Have a great day. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Image description

Hi PierreSelim, I was wondering whether you could provide me the image description of 2 files you deleted, notably:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stevelduct_ontwerp.JPG
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stevelduct_ontwerp_revolverlift.JPG

Thanks in advance, KVDP (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Descriptions are below-- PierreSelim (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I copied the text, you can delete it here now. KVDP (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Stevelduct_ontwerp.JPG

Nederlands: Schema van een ontwerp hoe een stevelduct kan gebouwd worden. Het bevat verschillende verbeteringen t.o.v. het voorop gestelde concept op Stevelduct.nl :

Eerst en vooral lijkt het grootste voordeel van het originele concept te zijn dat simpele pontons kunnen gebruikt worden om vracht verder landinwaarts te vervoeren, vanaf grote havens. Deze pontons moeten niet gemotoriseerd zijn en de propulsie is gecentraliseerd (de benodigde kracht wordt opgewekt door pompen, door de vracht eerst naar een hoger niveau te tillen zoals een sluis).

Welnu, in plaats van het gebruik van een betonnen structuur, denk ik dat het veel voordeliger is om gewoon kanalen te gebruiken/te graven. Ook gegraven kanalen zijn waterdicht (indien gegraven in klei) en kunnen een voldoende verval hebben om vracht over een significante afstand te vervoeren (wel hangt dit af van het terrein -niveauverschil-).

Een tweede opmerking is het gebruik van sluisen. Hoewel u deze techniek inderdaad kan gebruiken om de vracht naar een hoger niveau te tillen lijkt het me toch voordeliger/efficienter om gewoon gebruik te maken van de havenkranen (de vracht moet tevens sowieso al uitgeladen worden, dus lijkt het simpeler van gewoon de stevelduct daar te laten beginnen; op een hoger niveau, direct naast de loskade).

Dan ivm het ontwerp: Het eerste concept lijkt een ponton met 4 wielen te gebruiken voor stabiliteit. Echter, al naargelang van het gewicht geladen op de pontons (en deze zullen erg verschillen per container) kunnen de wielen veel meer frictie geven. Een extra gevaar hieraan gerelateerd is dat de pontons op elkaar kunnen varen, door het verschil in snelheid gepaard met de extra frictie.

Persoonlijk zou ik echter gewoon geen gebruik maken van wielen. In plaats hiervan denk ik dat het beter is om gewoon de rail in het water te plaatsen, en een onderdeel op de ponton te zetten dat over deze rail roetsjt, tezamen met een kiel om dit onderdeel en de boot te verbinden. De kiel zal tevens het ponton stabieler maken.

Als laatste is er nog de praktische bruikbaarheid. Hoewel het huidige ontwerp wel vracht verder landinwaarts kan brengen (wat bv nuttig is indien er verder landinwaarts geen rivieren meer zijn, of de rivieren te ondiep zijn voor vrachtschepen), kan het toch een specifieke vracht niet naar een specifieke bestemming brengen. Vrachtauto's zijn hier aldus nuttiger/efficienter. Door middel van de rail die ik voorstelde, is het toch mogelijk om dit te doen, door kanalen te graven die afsplitsen, en wissels te integreren bij deze afsplitsingen. Een simpel RFID systeem kan de wissel activeren of niet -al naargelang waarheen de ponton heen moet-.

Ik denk dat het systeem die ik voorstelde -voornamelijk door de eliminatie van de betonnen structuren- economisch interessanter is.

File:Stevelduct_ontwerp_revolverlift.JPG

Nederlands: Ontwerp voor een revolverlift voor het stevelduct concept. Dit ontwerp is een verbetering t.o.v. het concept vooropgesteld op Stevelduct.nl

Het lijkt me bv onlogisch dat op eenieder moment er 3 schepen (vol of leeg) in de revolverlift zouden aanwezig moeten zijn. Stilstaan van schepen betekent immers financieel verlies. Ook lijkt de revolverlift enorm groot (en dus duur), en de grootte ervan lijkt me tevens onnodig, indien u zich enkel right naar het verschil van gewicht van de ladingen (die echter wel kunnen verschillen naargelang de boot).

Ik heb een simpelere revolverlift uigetekend die slechts 1 boot per keer omhoogbrengt, en 1 naar beneden brengt. Deze lift bevat slechts vier "gaten". de rechthoeken symboliseren de in en uigangen (verbonden waterwegen). Indien ik ze in het groen tekende wil dit zeggen dat de gaten bezet zijn met een boot. Deze in het blauw zijn onbezet (bevatten enkel eenzelfde hoeveelheid water).

Op de rechterkant ziet u het heen en weer traject, die u tevens ook tekende in uw document (althans de bovenste). De boten die naar de monding gaan zijn geachte leeg te zijn, deze naar de zee zijn geacht vol te zijn (we gaan dus uit dat in de meeste situaties de boten worden gebruikt voor goederen te exporteren).

Gezien het ontwerp voor het heen en weer traject bij de originele revolverlift op Stevelduct.nl iets gesimplifieerd was ziet u tevens ook mijn alternatief schema eronder.

Voor dit systeem lijkt mijn revolverlift goed te werken, er is slechts een probleem voor boten die vol naar de monding wensen te gaan en boten die leeg naar de zee wensen te gaan. Hiervoor dienen waarschijnlijk 2 extra waterwegen en een apart liftsysteem te worden ontworpen.

Chiffres de mars

12,7M! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

\o/ \o/

Merci/thank you

Pierre, thank you for the notification about this closure. I can see the issue is complex. I feel rather strongly about my position, but I have come to understand from various people's comments that there are a number of consequences that need to be thought through/discussed before moving forward. Your notification is greatly appreciated! -Pete F (talk) 18:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)