User talk:Patrick Rogel/Archive 3

Guten Morgen Patrick. Lizenz war bereits eingereicht. [Ticket#2019032810004028] Eingangsbestätigung (Re: WG: RE: Foto Lippold [...]) MfG--Charlydia52 (talk) 07:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick

Thanks for flagging that this uploaded image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nell_Bryden_Daily_Mail.jpg needs further permission. I have gained permission and the photographer is submitting his consent. --LaraSonnet (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick.

What's problem? The photo "KS_1.jpg" are mine! Yes, it was provided by me for the interview on the link that you found. So what? The photo "Things Album Presentation at New stage of Alexandrinsky Theatre.jpg" made by me at the presentation of the album. All right, quit throwing up roadblocks. This paranoia has got to stop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatveySobolev (talk • contribs) 23:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request was sent. Please post

The photo of Arzu Həsənli.jpg is taken by me, I am her relative and have a permission and consent to put her picture. How can we proof or fix it? thanks in advance. The photo is only used in media by Shur Restaraunt's intagram account: https://www.instagram.com/p/BoEVuHeD2tf/. Arzu, the singer itself gave that permission. The Permission request was sent and proceeded by Wiki team. The original photo was also provided as a proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JazzMusicien (talk • contribs) 19:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Found the right source

Hello Partick, you have asked for deletion for the photo of Choudhary Rakesh Singh with a former President of India. The first upload was a mistake and I went to the online help channel asking to get it removed as I made a mistake with the copyright details. However, with my second upload, I found the right source which adheres with wikimedia norms. Kindly check the post's details and revert if you find any violations. Regards. Bharatsinghchaturvedi (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like license laundering to me. The Flickr image was uploaded today. I expect the other source is significantly older. Huon (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental Deletion Request

Hi Patrick, you have asked for deletion for the photo of Alexis von Hoensbroech. I am a representative of Austrian Airlines who I the owner of all copyrights. Best regards Peter

Hi Patrick, I was surprised by the message I received, since the photo that is published is mine and I use it on my social networks (personal and artistic). I do not see any problem, so I should not download my photo on the page that talks about me. I hope you see the subject well and that there are no misunderstandings.

Elsa Hosk photos

Accidental Deletion Request

Hi Patrick, I accidentally processed a nomination for deletion on a media file. Does the copyright holder have to submit another free-to-use form to rectify this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErtritK (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete deletion request for my image

I work as a photographer for SF, the party that uses the image of our politicians here: SF folketingsgruppe samt MEP august 2016 foto William Vest-Lillesoe.jpg. I am the photographer and have now sent a release form by email. Of course the image is also used by us (uploaded by me) for other purposes such as our website, but I have now granted the rights to share alike. Can you please delete the copyvio tag for the image? I have likewise sent release forms for other photos I have taken and uploaded that were tagged for deletion and hope I am now allowed to display them. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williameinar (talk • contribs) 07:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC) --Williameinar (talk) 07:54, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me delete

Dear Patrick, I followed the steps with the utmost attention to details and I do not see what is missing with this file. I am in contact with the permission team in France, I sent them a copy of my ID and I got approved to go forward. I feel extremely disappointed by your message as it looks as a lack of coordination on the wikimedia side. Could you please help me instead of rejecting my contribution without knowing the background? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehomard08 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Following your message as what you informed can’t be done. Can you please help me remove the requested file without delay. Thanks in advance. AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 23:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete my files again without sending a request to me

You are unaware of what you are doing and are false flagging me. This is going to make me have to do more work because you are making assumptions. You quoted an article with the photo I own and that article made no claim to the copyright. Do not do this again. In the future send me a message asking for clarification. I expressly have the rights to publish this photo on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DiscoDiego (talk • contribs) 04:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uncomprehensible DR

Estimee M Rogel, it is impossible to understand your DR https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clavillazo_in_"PIERNAS_DE_ORO".jpg because of bad english. "any reason for U.S. law to apply" is not comprehensible (sp?). And, if it was published in the US without a copyright notice, what is your analysis of the legala consequences? --Janwikifoto (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Missing permission

Bonjour Rogel, your DR https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pura_vida.jpg is difficult if not impossible to understand. No permission? If the picture actually _was_ published in the US without a copyright notice, what is your analysis? Would it then be ok for Commons/Wikipedia? What does "Source: Ebay listing" mean to you? Please analyze and write your conclusions here. Best Regards, --Janwikifoto (talk) 23:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gazal world

Hi, You can close or withdraw a deletion request if you create it. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What made Patrick Rogel label the pictures "Out of COM:SCOPE personal images"? Please explain, so I can understand your thinking. --Janwikifoto (talk) 11:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me with the proper procedure to follow?

Dear Patrick

thanks for your message about my julien_bobroff_portrait.jpg added file to Commons.Wikimedia. I must admit I'm a little beginner with proper procedures and I don't know how to do it properly. CAn you advice me ? I submitted the file a few weeks ago, you put it for deletion, I argued that I did the picture myself and there was no violation of copyright and asked for undeletion. But no action was taken then and the file was deleted.

I did not see other action than to to resubmit another version of it. But this time, thanks to the former interactions I had with you, I gave a clear advertismement about possible issues as described in the summary section here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Julien_Bobroff_Portrait.jpg (trying to make it the more transparent and clear I could).

Can you advise me how I should proceed to convince you and others that the file is fairly produced by myself with no copyright issue ? I have to admit this is the first time the content I put on Wikimedia encounters such problems and I sincerely want to proove my honesty.

Thanks in advance for your help (and sorry for the length of the message). Julien Bobroff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jubobroff (talk • contribs) 13:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suite

re-bonjour

vous me conseiller de proceder à un "COM:OTRS". Si j'ai bien compris la page correspondante, il s'agit du cas où la photo downloadée l'a été par la personne n'ayant pas les droits dessus. Mais, au risque de me répeter, je suis l'auteur de la photo. Je ne vois pas trop le sens de m'accorder à moi-même une autorisation d'utiliser ma photo. Ou bien j'ai mal compris ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jubobroff (talk • contribs) 13:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re-bonjour. Je vous renvoie à la réponse qui vous a été faite ("For images already published elsewhere without evidence of free license, a written free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions is required. Also, I cannot find no evidence about self-timer in the EXIF data; you may nedd to prove to the OTRS agent handling your permission that the photo was indeed made using a self-timer"). Apparemment l'administrateur ne croit pas qu'un timer ait été utilisé... Passer par COM:OTRS/fr est la seule façon d'essayer de régler le problème. Sinon, la photo seraindéfiniment supprimée. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rogel> "Apparemment l'administrateur ne croit pas qu'un timer ait été utilisé... " which adminsitrator do you talk about? I can not find the name of the admin you refer to. Please inform me, --Janwikifoto (talk) 14:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete my photo - Thomas Crowther British Ecologist

Hi Patrick

You've deleted the photo of me on copyright grounds. This photo was taken with my camera in 2017, and uploaded to the Global Forest Biodiversity Initiative (GFBI) website (http://www.gfbinitiative.org). The GFBI is an initiative I co-founded and I provided this photo for the creation of that website. I've also used this image in the past for my own Google Scholar. I do not know Greg Seymor personally, but I have no issues with him using my photo for the purposes of his presentation on my research.

I'd really appreciate if you could undelete my photo on the Thomas Crowther (ecologist) wikipedia page.

Thanks in advance.

Kind Regards Thomas Crowther — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twcrowther (talk • contribs) 14:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foto's Alain de Bie

Hai Patrick, ik ben vergeten om het bewijs te leveren dat de auteur mij recht heeft gegeven om dit bestand te gebruiken. Echter, ik heb het persoonlijk gevraagd en de bestanden zijn zelfs geupload vanaf zijn computer. Hoe kan ik laten zien dat hij mij recht heeft gegeven om zijn afbeeldingen te gebruiken? Ben alleen bekend met Wikipedia, niet echt met Commons.

Mvg, SjoerdvDonk (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons: Undeletion request for DariaBignardi low res

Dear Patrick, I kindly ask you to restore the image "DariaBignardi low res.jpg" which I uploaded yesterday on Daria Bignardi's Italian Wiki Page and that you deleted from Commons (User_talk_Dreammy). The photo is actually on Public domain and you can find it on different websites, beside the one I quoted (https://www.librimondadori.it/autore/daria-bignardi/) and which I chose to mention just because it's her Italian publisher. Here are some examples:

I hope this is enough information for you to procede with the undeletion. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do. Bye Dreammy (talk)

Alex_Barbier.png

Bonjour M. Cogel, Comme je vous l'ai expliqué précédemment, la photo que vous avez retirée a été prise au cours du tournage du film "Alex Barbier, portrait" de Laura Petitjean, dont je suis le producteur (Production : Zorobabel/Novanima). Voici la page du film : http://zorobabel.be/films/34barbier.html Nous avons choisi de mettre cette photo pour illustrer l'article et rendre hommage à l'artiste (la réalisatrice est en ce moment avec la famille pour les aider). Nous avons donc mis une photo originale et avons décidé de la mettre sous Commons Licence. Il n'y a aucune raison de la retirer : comment pouvons-nous violer les droits d'une photo que nous avons nous-mêmes procurée ? Merci de votre attention. William Henne (talk) 11:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Keppens

The rights on the picture of File:Marc Keppens.jpg have been sent twice to permission-commons, once by the author and once again by me (the author also sent it to me), so I don't understand why the copyright warning is being kept on the picture's page. --Queeste (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Macheta - Catedrala Mântuirii Neamului.jpg

The three pictures are public domains, found on all theological sites in Romania. They belong to the Romanian Patriarchate, who offered them to the public domain. I've been to the cathedral many times. They are very happy to promote their model. If they agree verbally, it is necessary to write ?!?. However, after completing the cathedral's construction, the model becomes useless. Officials are glad if the model is promoted on wiki and other platforms... and I offered to promote the model. If you want to delete the picture, that's it. An example of a link (there are hundreds of sites):/// http://basilica.ro/catedrala-nationala-un-deziderat-al-romanilor-inca-din-timpul-regelui-carol-i/ /// https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMzbZBRLfQw /// If you do not like... I take the picture and abandon it on the Commons site. There is no end to the world!. Sometimes when you want to do a promotion is interpreted as wrong. MIHAIL (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Macheta

It makes no sense to explain 100 years, for some pictures that is a free public domain and where everything is arranged for promotion. This picture is good? /// File:People's Salvation Cathedral - Panorama (Noiembrie - 2018).jpg /// or you want to delete it too :)). Officials are very happy to be promoted, but strangers from other countries, do not understand what's inside the institution. We now know what pictures you do not want ^_^ pff. I say do not waste your time... If you want to delete very well, go.. anyway the picture is abandoned. We find other promotional pictures. Nobody cry for a photo... the last message MIHAIL (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pour une généalogie critique de la Francophonie.pdf

There is proof of permission: see the URI. Please do the most basic investigation before tagging. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete the image Aslîka Qadir

I would like to upload this image for an article in kurdish about a kurdish female artist it lacks her image, I uploaded this image to wikimedia commons but I don't know how to upload it to the article. this is the link to the article (https://ku.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asl%C3%AEka_Qadir ), I found other images of this kurdish female singer on google images, (not protected by copyright) but I don't know to upload one of them to this article (entry) about her. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shwanshawn (talk • contribs) 18:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need help resolving photo issues

Hello, all photos under user name: zoe340 are being marked for deletion due to your finding them in violation. All photos except for the photo with Warren Beatty are fully used either by permission or are directly owned. Please advise on how to best resolve this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoe340 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NEW QUESTION: Okay, I understand that I need permission sent to your COM:OTRS link that you sent to me, and thank for that by the way. However, could you please explain to me exactly what is required in their message and permission that they must leave for Lorraine Feather? I.E., Steve Granitz grants permission for Lorraine Feather to post photo: "Lorraine-Feather-at-the-56th-Grammy-Awards.jpg" for use on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Is this acceptable? Please explain to me what will be excepted by Wikimedia and Wikipedia, because these are extremely busy photographers who become annoyed at special requests like this one, so I will have only one opportunity to get this right. Please advise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoe340 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Etiquetado de la imagen File:Maria Teresa Belandria.jpg

Hola Patrick, la imagen tiene la plantilla correcta, fue tomada por la National Defense University que es dependiente del Departamento de Defensa de Estados Unidos, y que a su vez es dependiente del Gobierno Federal de los Estados Unidos. Te pido quites el anuncio. https://www.williamjperrycenter.org/es/about/full-time-faculty/sra-mar%C3%ADa-teresa-belandria --Enmanuel2307 (talk) 23:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course yes, a .org site can be a U.S. Gov site, just read in Wikipedia or another place that the William J. Perry Center is a institute of the National Defense University and this is of the U.S. Department of Defense. --Enmanuel2307 (talk) 23:44, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio's

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pastor Joshua Park (talk • contribs) 02:58, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pastor Joshua Park (talk • contribs) 19:13, 5 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pastor Joshua Park (talk • contribs) 00:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am the admin of www.sf.dk and work for SF (https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialistisk_Folkeparti) directly with Serdal Benli. Our party has the rights to the image at https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serdal_Benli#/media/File:SERDAL_BENLI_0083_HansZeuthen2018.png and agree for it to be used according to Wikimedia Commons terms. Please remove copyvio tag. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williameinar (talk • contribs) 17:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, I am the copyright holder of the image on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr-sophocleous.jpg. You flagged it in violation. I have also correctly tagged the image as open license. This was previously deleted without my knowledge and I had to re-uploaded. Please remove the deletion request promptly, and provide proper guidance and necessary information as to how to avoid deletion of this file in future. Thanks in advance. Navidcyir (talk)

Hi Patrick, I am the copyright holder of my image. You flagged my website as the violation. Thanks. Dtaylor717 (talk)

Hi Patrick. I have deleted a number of the images that you nominated for deletion - they all had author info in the exif. Can I ask - why do you not tag these as CSD? Thanks Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick. I represent Gokul Suresh's official team. The image that you nominated for deletion is the official content under our own copyright. Please brief me whatever necessary steps I would have to take next. And thanks in advance AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick. I am Lars Barnewitz and currently in a DR with you about a Copyvio https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dr_Otto_von_Bauer,_Deutschbalte,_Geschäftsführer_Fabergé.jpg I have responded, providing proof of my being the Copyrightholder. Please notify me if there are any further documents you need me to provide in order for me to proceed with my article. Thank you kindly. Lars banerwitz 16:58, 06 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lars barnewitz: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dr_Otto_von_Bauer,_Deutschbalte,_Gesch%C3%A4ftsf%C3%BChrer_Faberg%C3%A9.jpg&diff=337965127&oldid=337540232 Closing requested. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick. File:Governor Ned Lamont of Connecticut, official portrait.jpg had an open OTRS as I've been working with the copyright holder to get their permission verified. While it was essentially the same as File:Governor Ned Lamont portrait.jpg, it was different in that it had the full metadata. Furthermore, File:Governor Ned Lamont portrait.jpg was accidently uploaded under public domain rationale - that was my mistake and I've apologized profusely for it ever since. I'll be formally requesting undeletion, although I'm not overly optimistic about my chances anymore. Woko Sapien (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, I noticed that you nominate for deletion some logos on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Achmadmaulanaibr. Why some are OK, some are not? kindly please elaborate. Also, i think government of Indonesia are copyrights holder of Indonesian government agency logo (such as OJK, BPH MIGAS, LSF, Ombudsman, Bawaslu, ANRI, BPOM, BPKP, Ministry of Youth and Sport, Ministry of villages.) and since they are part of government of Indonesia, I believe that we can license PD-IDGov. --Ckfasdf ([[User talk:Ckfasdf|talk 2:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Instrument image dusepo_renlute.jpg

I have already added the required source information. All the images are from the same source - me! I took all these images and created a collage. All the source information is there. I don't understand what the issue is, please can you clairfy? Respubliko de Gvapolando (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of PAENDA photos

Dear Rogel,

would you please be so kind as to undelete the picture for PAENDA. The photo rights lie with PAENDA's label, Wohnzimmer Records. Thomas Ramsdorfer took the photos, but does not in fact own it (it might have come across as confusing, as I've put his name down - but he took the photos, so I felt obligated to name him). I have permission by Wohnzimmer label head Kerstin Breyer, as well as PAENDA aka Gabriela Horn herself, to publish these photos on Wikipedia, as she is my sister.

The pictures are, in fact, publically available for ANY use on this page: https://promotion.wohnzimmer.com/mcard.php?token=NUDN7K2TV1SHAO67NUZ3I69Z

This concerns the following pictures:

File:Austrian singer PAENDA (c) ORF Thomas Ramsdorfer.jpg File:Producer, Singer, Songwriter PAENDA (c) ORF Thomas Ramsdorfer.jpg File:Austrian musician PAENDA (c) ORF Thomas Ramsdorfer.jpg

Thanks in advance, Best, Christina Horn aka Christiana009 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christiana009 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Etiquetado de la imagen File:Comunicado dirigido a todas las Embajadas presentes en Venezuela 2019-01-23.jpg

Buenas tardes, tal como se indica en la información de Licencia, la imagen es un documento oficial publicado por Juan Guaidó, Presidente Encargado de Venezuela, por lo cual según la ley de derecho de autor de Veneuela queda libre de derecho y pasa a ser de dominio público — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willicab (talk • contribs)

Hello Patrick, it’s Michael Griffiths.

Hello Patrick, I see you have put the two images I added to the page ‘Michael Lieber’ up for deletion, I have take your reasons for deletion into consideration, and am currently running around doing everything I can to stop the process by giving as much info as I can, please help me keep these images up and retract your request if you can. Michael Griffiths Michaelgriffiths (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo's Yvonne van Dorp

Dear Patrick Rogel, see my reaction to your remarks on my user talk page: Piet.Wijker. Regards, Piet.Wijker (talk) 08:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression de photos de Red Cardell

Bonjour, vous avez supprimé plusieurs photos de Red Cardell ou de ses musiciens (Fred Lucas, Farid Aït Siameur et Jean-Michel Moal, Pierre Sangra) dont je suis l'auteur. Si elles apparaissent sur la page facebook du groupe c'est que tout simplement habitant la même région qu'eux je vais les voir souvent en concert et les prend en photo que je leur transmet ensuite. Vous pouvez vérifier mes propos en contactant directement le groupe sur sa page facebook.--Filbar29 (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Sarra works deleted

Dear Patrick Rogel,

you marked a pictures I uploaded of Sergio Sarra's works because of copyright violation. Anyway, I think there is a misunderstanding.

I mentioned as the source of the images the website of Archivio Studio Sarra where there are some of these photos. The website is copyrighted, but the "Archivio Studio Sarra" give me a slightly different copy of each image intended for free Creative Commons use by the owner himself. So the real source of the image is simply "Archivio Studio Sarra".

The images intended for free Creative Commons use by the owner himself are:

Sergio Sarra.jpg
File:Earvin 'Magic' Johnson, Sergio Sarra, Darnell Valentine.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra, two Ipnlogic 5, 2013.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra, Relationship, 2006.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra Table sculpture.jpg
File:Umberto Curi, La forza dello sguardo.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra, iceberg 7 - study no.2, 2017.jpg
File:1 - Aperto '93, Venice Biennale, installation view.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra, Psichedelyc garden 1 - Psichedelyc garden 3, 2008.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra, Involuntary commitment, 2010.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra, Pettino, planimetria di Contrada Selva, 2011.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra in studio.jpg
File:Paesaggio, 1993, pittura ad olio su tela, 40 x 53 cm. Aperto '93, XLV Esposizione Internazionale d’Arte di Venezia, La Biennale di Venezia, Corderie dell’Arsenale, 1993. Foto
File:Sergio Sarra - Caparsino.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - LSD.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - Elisabetta.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - due Ipnologic.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - Italian garden and fountain.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - Italian garden with child.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - Players in the Mediterranean.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - D. dal vero n. 2.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - Psychedelic garden.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - EWHA Womans University.jpg
File:Sergio Sarra - Vetta del Monte.jpg

I would like to understand how to correct the source of images (from sergiosarra.it to Archivio Studio Sarra) and remove the copyright violation tagging for all the pictures mentioned above. Obviously, I can prove that the images I uploaded are the copies intended for free Creative Commons use by the owner himself, the "Archivio Studio Sarra".

Kind regards, Synenvi (talk) 12:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you giving false reports?

You have reported about a picture that I own. Please, ask from me first, before you make any false reports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jannegylling79 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel

Good day, You have removed the cover of a book by Hugo Coya. I am the person in charge of uploading content on his Wikipedia page. I have been working with the writer for a long time and he has trusted me to edit the content. Therefore, Hugo Coya can also spread the covers of his own books. I hope you do not eliminate it anymore. Please. I wait your answer. Thank you. Luiscceres (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't eliminate the cover of a book

Good day, You have removed the cover of a book by Hugo Coya. I am the person in charge of uploading content on his Wikipedia page. I have been working with the writer for a long time and he has trusted me to edit the content. Therefore, Hugo Coya can also spread the covers of his own books. I hope you do not eliminate it anymore. Please. I wait your answer. Thank you. Luiscceres (talk) 14:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Raoul Millais

Hello Sir, I apologise for uploading Roaul Millais images. Fortunately I realised that I didn't have permission before I loaded the remaining group. I thought I was covered at the outset because most of the painting swere painted over seventy years ago (but not all) .I thought I was thus covered for uploading but now realise I need to get the publishers' written permission for the paintings' representation to be used. I got myself into a bit of a flap actually for which I apologise. As you will see I'm normally further back into the past.I am fine about deleting the remaining image. Dorkinglad (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zapruder Mural

Hi I’m the artist that painted zapruder mural in Funchal , Madeira island , and there’s an article here with someone else’s name . Could you help me out ? Bárbara Gil is the correct name . VinniPes (talk) 02:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression d'images

Bonjour, je souhaite supprimer la photo car je ne savais pas quelle avait déjà été utilisée. Comment faire? Liliane225 (talk) 07:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Christopher Dembik.jpg

Hello, the permission to use directly appears on the image, as it is originally published on the webpage. --Willicab (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm working on it. --Willicab (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finn Bálor photo

The picture supplied is approved by Finn for use on his Wikipedia page and since I took it I am the holder of the copyright and releasing it. Dvtsource (talk) 20:57, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To get around the 160 day hold on already published works, I have added a non published photo to be used. Dvtsource (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures to Werner von Schmieden and Karl-Armin Tröger

Hi Patrick, these two pictures that you ask to delete are our private pics. Werner von Schmieden as well as Karl-Armin Tröger are my relatives. The picture in question from Werner von Schmieden is from the private photo album from my parents and my mum scanned it. The picture in question with Karl-Armin Tröger has been made by Katri Faehling, my ex-gf and friend of the family. She made this picture on a private family event from my parents. So yes, we do have the permissions to both the pictures. And I herewith kindly ask you to approve both. GAP089 (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air Marshal Asghar Khan, PAF.jpg

@Patrick Rogel, Air Marshal Asghar Khan retired in 1968, In this picture he is in air force uniform, from 1968 to 2019 - 51 years have been passed since he retired from the air force, moreover this picture was taken in 1964. Shamsun N Tushar (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See some photos, should these photos remain in wikimedia commons?

@Patrick Rogel, I am giving you some files which are not full of information, I mean they are lacking proper information, see:

File:17 January 1951 - Ayub Khan assumes charge as CinC of the Pakistan Army.jpg
File:Kaptai dam in East Pakistan being visited by Ayub Khan.jpg
File:Lieutenant General Sir Frank Messervy.jpg
File:Muhammed Ayub Khan 1940-41.jpg
File:General Muhammad Musa Khan Hazara (1958–1966).jpg
File:Yahya Khan as the Army C-in-C.jpg
File:General Yahya Khan.jpg
File:Sahabzada Yaqub Khan.jpg
File:General Muhammad Musa Khan Hazara.jpg, this photo has been downloaded from here:http://www.pakarmymuseum.com/exhibits/general-muhammad-musa/ (click on the image you will see the full version)

See these photos carefully, do they meet the criteria of being public domains? have these photos are permitted to be published in Wikimedia commons? Shamsun N Tushar (talk) 03:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mistral-LCAC.jpg

File:Mistral-LCAC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JackStrong12 (talk) 22:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rafale Logo.jpg

File:Rafale Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JackStrong12 (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ibertiogamgbandeira.jpg

Hi, Please do not tag this for speedy. Also for File:Ibertiogamgbrasao.jpg. The license may be valid. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete my photo - בית ספר לבני אלוהים

Hi Patrick

You've deleted the photo of me on copyright grounds. The picture is a cover of my book that I designed and edited 2019, and uploaded to my website (http://www.idanedut.com). I've also used this image in the past for my book.

I'd really appreciate if you could undelete my photo on the ch, בית ספר לבני אלוהים wikiquote page.

Thanks in advance.

idan edut — Preceding unsigned comment added by מילו-לי (talk • contribs) 13:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete my photo

I really made this photo, as I declared. Plus, the reason for deletion is not that is form google plus, that is a google profile, and on google profile u do not have any photo but the video. So, it is tuning, not the fact. I have series of photos like that, so I can upload them. Therefore be creative, not destructive to author of new and great profile image on wi. Ing576 (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo marked for copyright violations: Jonathan Stamler.jpg

Patrick, you have marked a photo I uploaded for copyright violation and deletion. This photo of a person was given to me by the subject and it was made as a work for hire. We had the photographer remove the embedded copyright EXIF information in the version of the photo that I uploaded (and I gave the website and email address of the photographer in the submission so he could confirm this when asked). You have found an instance of an uncropped version of this photograph on a website (a news release from the subject's employer), and this version still contains the original copyright watermark. I know of at least one other website using versions of the same photo (see https://www.uhhospitals.org/harrington-discovery-institute/harrington-investigators/jonathan-stamler) that will also contain the original copyright watermark. My question to you is, how do I submit a photo taken for hire, where I have permission to do so from the subject and the photographer, despite other versions appearing on websites that contain copyright information? How do I get Wikimedia to actually ask the photographer as they say they will (I thought I had requested this in my submission). Or do I need to have all websites containing any version of this photo replace their versions with the one with no embedded EXIF watermark?? Sorry, first time uploading a photo here, and thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPremont (talk • contribs) 14:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Fine Bodybuilding.jpg

Dear Patrick Rogel,

I am writing to you to inquire why the image I've uploaded to Wikipedia is being considered for deletion by you. The image has been given to me by the individual, and I have their permission to use it on Wikipedia free from copyright. The image displays the individual posing for a bodybuilding athletic competition and does not pose any inappropriate or harmful behavior. Please reconsider deleting the image.

Thank you, RMozes

--Rmozes (talk) 20:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the notification of deleting some of the the photos of Padre Fortea in Commons

Dear Patrick: Those photographs (the information is below) even they appear in that blog you mentioned are completely free of copyright. I am the owner. It is true that they appear on that blog, but with my permission. Tell me how I can probe to you I am the owner. If you wish you can email the person appears in the photograh and he will ratify that "Bibliotecario intrepido" is the person that owns the photographs. The writter of that blog has a personal website www.fortea.ws with an email of contact. Regards. Bibliotecariointrepido

File:Padre Fortea, año 2018, Ecuador.jpg

File:Padre Fortea 34324.jpg

File:Padre Fortea Catedral de Alcala.jpg

.............................

Dear Patrick: Tell me if it will do with that explanation of the blog (link below) where the images are and is cause of the doubt about who is the owner:

https://blogdelpadrefortea.blogspot.com/2019/01/for-whom-it-may-concern.html

File:Abt Vinzenz Wohlwend.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation.

Dear Patrick

The Photo-File has been provided by the community https://www.mehrerau.at/de/im-konvent-leben-gott-dienen . Thanks vor un-deleting the Photo-File.

Regards Laurentin1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurentin1 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please.

Man, what's wrong with you? you're delating all my photos. All the photos has the rights permisson. --Enmanuel2307 (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests/File:Newton-King at SAMCODES JSE Launch.jpg

Hi Patrick. It seems this image isn't the problem but the image from which it was created File:SAMCODES JSE Launch 2.jpg is, owing to copyright violation 2007, right? I merely created the Newton-King file from the SAMCODES file with the appropriate attributions, so if there is a problem with the original file I was unaware of it. I assume that use JLL87 won't be making a representation here. Please delete them if you do find they are in contravention, thanks.Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 04:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete image, I have obtained legal copyrights for the same.

I recreated the deleted media with the permission from the owner. The ticket # 2019022310004271 has been raised for releasing copyrights. Please review the same , and guide me if something else needs to be done on the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suyogbhatkhalkar (talk • contribs) 02:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope

Marking as possible copyvio because https://www.picsunday.com/p/Amir-Abbas-Fakhravar.html

https://www.picsunday.com/p/Amir-Abbas-Fakhravar.html is a random automatic image aggregator site. Generally useless to prove copyvio. Sometimes, if it provides a clear date for when the image was indexed and that date predates the Commons upload. Which is not the case here. Even worse: the proof for copyvio here is an image hotlinked from Commons. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 08:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And now it's deleted.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meghan Markle at the Endeavour Fund Awards 2019-02-07.jpg

The File:Meghan Markle at the Endeavour Fund Awards 2019-02-07.jpg was also on the official website of Kensington Palace. Images coming from a website like this one become part of public domain. Thank you,

Schweiz41 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schweiz41 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me delete the requested image

I apologize for uploading the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baekhyun_profile.jpg (My intention was only to update a singer named Baekhyun's profile picture). Could you please help me remove the requested file? Thank you in advance! Arisarisa (talk) 11:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bruenig's photo is not a copyright violation

Hi, you wrote on Bruenig's photo page that the photo was taken from this website: https://www.canisius.edu/conversations-in-christ. But that is not the case. The photo comes from Shorenstein Center, and you can see the name of the center on the photo. I correctly credited them and they have CC 3.0 on their page. Can you please let me know where I was wrong? In the meantime, another editor has removed the photo, so I'm asking you to remove your initial complaint, because it's not true, and to ask for the photo to be reinstated. Thank you! Emu14 (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission

Hi Patrick Re: File:Giorgi Latso Ehrbarsaal2019.jpg I did sent email to indicated email already. Awaiting for reply. Thanks! Asuas (talk) 12:49, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lizenz permisssion

Hi Patrick, Prof Remschmidt has sent a Lizenz permission for his portrait to Wikimedia commons, today. Best wishes --Dodecaeder (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ya Tosiba Photo

Dear Patrick,

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ya_Tosiba.jpg

this upload is not a copyright violation since I have written permission by the photographer to use it on Wiki, the permission is also included in the Metadata (click Extended Details).

Best wishes! - K. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kausalitaet (talk • contribs) 21:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request

Dear Patrick, The image Juan_Sebatián_Romero.jpg https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Sebasti%C3%A1n_Romero#/media/File:Juan_Sebati%C3%A1n_Romero.jpg has no copyright violation. It belongs to me. The guy in the picture was my partner from 2000 to 2011 until he died. I took that photo on 2010. The personal blog https://edunewscolombia.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/muere-el-primer-gay-que-afilio-a-su-pareja-a-la-seguridad-social/ in which this image appears probably took it from his Facebook page. Please untag my photo from deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asanjuanc (talk • contribs) 23:32, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Long An F.C jpg

Hi Patrick, both Thể Công F.C. and Long An F.C. logos I took them from their others language wiki pages. The Cong from de.wiki page ^[1] and Long An from vietnamese wiki page. ^[2] I filled out their detail info which are following original info. They are both used free for info providing their club. Please check it out. Thanks.

За изтритите файлове на Katev2019

Здравей те! Patrick Rogel казвам се Серьожа Вълков и съм фотограф на снимките и автор на книгите в посочените файлове. Ако е необходимо пишете по какъв начин да го докажа?

• File:Серьожа Вълков 11.06.2016.JPG

• File:Корица на Моята автобиография, ч. 1.jpg

• File:Обложка на CD на История на град Брусарци, т. 2.jpg

• File:Обложка на CD на Истоия на град Брусарци, т. 1.jpg

• File:Корица на том втори на История на град Брусарци.jpg

• File:Корица на История на град Брусарци.jpg

• File:Корица на Годишник на военна академия Г. С. Раковски, 2007.jpg

• File:Корица на Военноисторически сборник, 3, 2007.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katev2019 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--Katev2019 (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

what we think of you

motherfucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.181.48.180 (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most of us actually like him a great deal.

--GRuban (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

re:File:Mhanmad-Jawahiri.jpg

Hi there. File:Mhanmad-Jawahiri.jpg was originally on the English Wikipedia (en:File:Mhanmad-Jawahiri.jpg), which was transferred from the Kurdish Wikipedia (ckb:پەڕگە:Mhanmad-Jawahiri.jpg). On both wikis the work is licensed under CC-Attribution-sharealike 3.0. Unfortunately the original source provided on the Kurdish Wikipedia ([1]) may have expired. Any suggestion about what to do next? Thank you very much! --靖天子 (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. The licenses on en and ckb wiki may be incorrect then. Please delete it. Thanks.--靖天子 (talk) 23:42, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Nayib-Bukele.jpg

Hi Patrick, I saw that you marked the image as copyrights violation, that being said I want to clarify that I have the rights of the picture for that reason I uploaded the original one which no one has it but me. This image comes from photoshoot in mid 2017 for the former mayor of San Salvador asked by him for public usage.

This image has been released also for press usage, as you can see in this links from some news sites:

http://www.unimexicali.com/noticias/internacional/555603/con-37-anos-bukele-sera-el-presidente-mas-joven-de-el-salvador.html

https://www.elheraldo.hn/mundo/1167855-466/nayib-bukele-es-la-nueva-cara-de-la-pol%C3%ADtica-salvadore%C3%B1a

If you need anything else to un-mark the file for deletion, let me know.

Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreX (talk • contribs) 02:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Please refrain from disputing the images I have uploaded and were given to me by the authors or, are my personal property, simply because you can Google the images up. --Malojojo (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes

Espero me disculpes te responda en español, cuestión de tiempo, mi inglés no es muy bueno.

Sobre las siguientes tres imagenes cuya licencia fue cuestionada [2], [3], [4] pertenecen a la legislatura provincial de Catamarca, Argentina. Eso quiere decir que se encuentran libres de copyright bajo la ley Nº 22.362 de diciembre de 1980. Dicha ley establece que no puede ser registrado bajo derechos de autor un retrato de una persona "el nombre, seudónimo o retrato de una persona", del mismo modo que "las letras, palabras, nombres, distintivos, símbolos, que usen o deban usar la Nación, las provincias, las municipalidades, las organizaciones religiosas y sanitarias". Del mismo modo que son libres de derechos de autor las imágenes publicadas por la legislatura de la provincia de Buenos Aires y la legislatura de la Capital Federal, lo serán las de las demás legislaturas provinciales, porque cuentan como imagen emitida por una autoridad argentina. Saludos.--FelipeRev (talk) 14:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is an image of a coat of arms or other emblem or insignia of a national, regional or local government entity of Argentina. Images such as these are often protected by copyright. See COM:Argentina. Please replace this tag with another tag such as {{PD-old-70-expired}} or {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} that explains why this file may be freely used. Files without a valid license tag may be deleted.

English ∙ español ∙ +/−

Edit summaries (again)

The next time I see you make a disingenuous edit summary like this, I will report such behavior. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restore request

Please restore https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Election_poster_of_Luxembourg_social_election,_2019_(LCGB).jpg. Permission has been sent to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org. GilPe (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding possible copyright violation

The photo you marked as a possible copyright violation is owned by the person written about and was uploaded to the page on her request. All the photos in the online article you linked to are personal, owned by the person interviewed and therefore not marked copyrighted like photos owned by this online media are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunnlaugurb (talk • contribs) 20:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete deletion request

I'm a manager of Aleksandra Węglewicz who's you've tagged for deletion. It is made by Mioduszewska as you've noticed, but it'a a paid photoshoot and have full rights to distribute this photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjotrokrates (talk • contribs) 12:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File: Katerina Notopoulou.png

As I saw you tagged file Katerina Notopoulou.png for deletion. This photo is from a YouTube video. In video description it says it is copyright free, so screenshots can be taken from video and uploaded at Wikipedia. The video uploader is Η ΑΥΓΗ and you can check the source (video) so to verify that. If this channel does not hold the copyright you can contact them, but as there is no report in the video and it is copyright free any screenshot can be taken and be uploaded at Wikipedia and there is not reason for deleting the file. Stevenmits (talk) 22:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

I adjusted the date to be more accurate. I provided the picture for the pdf you cited. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alisa_Pomerantz-Boro.jpg#Summary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sboro (talk • contribs) 23:51, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocages

Bonjour,

J'en ai un peu ras-le-bol de trouver des images, les upload et qu'elles se fassent suppr derrière juste parce qu'elle "viole" des droits ??? Je mets les bonnes licences, on m'a conseiller de chercher des images sur flickr, ce que je fais... Que faire de plus pour éviter de me faire à nouveau bloquer sur wikicommons parce qu'en ai marre vraiment... Merci ! Datsofelija (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)datsofelija[reply]

Process?

Process Problem here Patrick. You have nominated for deletion three images of Rita Orji. When challenged you say "not useful" But! - on her wiki page maybe??? on her wikidata record? Can you bring back the two images that were deleted. I can see no evidence that you have done sufficient investigation on this IMO and you were about to delete useful stuff, which I hope you will find a matter for some concern. Victuallers (talk) 10:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Patrick Rogel. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rights to the photos at Eva Ceresnakova page

Hello Patrick,

hopefully this is the right way to respond your messages regarding used photos on the page Eva Ceresnakova The photographs used are paid to the photographer and I am fully in right to use them publicly. If you need any more details, please, let me know. Thank you,

kind regards, Eva — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheery.eva (talk • contribs) 22:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the deletion request for Jacqueline Quinn image

Hello,

I uploaded a photo to Jacqueline Quinn's Wikipedia page today at the request of Jacqueline Quinn. I am her webmaster for her website (www.jacquelinequinn.com) which is cited as the conflict for the image I uploaded today. It is the same image that she provided to me for both her website and her Wikipedia page, hence it appears in both places.

Kindly remove the copyright violation so that the photo she provided will remain on her Wikipedia page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnsteinberg (talk • contribs) 22:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of picture

Hello Patrick,

you placed one of the photos I uploaded for deletion. The reason according to you, that this is family picture and it is not probable that USMC held such picture in their archive. That is wrong and I can send you original description of the photo, which could prove the authenticity of the source (Official USMC photo).

Here is the picture: Robert E. Cushman, George W. Smith and his wife Nancy.jpg

Please let me know your e-mail or other way how to send you original. AntonyZ

Ticket#: 2019031010000654 permission sent for Jacqueline Quinn photo

Hello Patrick, Thank you for your advice regarding the photos that were uploaded today for Jacqueline Quinn's page. For the photo we wish to keep - File:Jacqueline_Quinn.png - I have followed the instructions on OTRS and submitted a permission on Ticket # 2019031010000654. Best regards, George — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnsteinberg (talk • contribs) 03:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for deletion of image in Sirsi

Mr. Patrick,

        I was notified that the image has multiple image in a single picture. I have enclosed description clearly with each name of the pictures inside the file and i have uploaded considering as my own work in the Wikipedia commons. I would suggest you to further verify the description and Author and inform the problem still more elaborately because i have already enclosed the information expressed in the talk.  Dh4445666 (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Sanam Jung's promotional shoot for Jago Pakistan Jago.jpg deletion.

Hi! Thanks for your rather speedy work; appreciate it. The fact is that this is my own work. The FB post you've referred to is actually a fanpage of a Pakistani Actress. I should be thanking you for bringing this to my attention. The person(s) who uploaded this picture to their Facebook profile is the culprit of violating copyright rules. I'm going to report that post right now. This picture is from a promotional shoot and has been used ONLY ONCE on the web by my permission: "https://www.hum.tv/marriage-has-been-a-totally-different-experience-for-me-sanam-jung/" Otherwise, this picture abides by the rules. I hope you understand and remove the 'speedy deletion' tag to the earliest of your convenience. Thank you! ASStoroid (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion tags

Removing a tag for a formal deletion debate before it's resolved, that's not done. Removing an erroneous tag for speedy deletion, there's no problem with that. (Provided it really is erroneous, of course. But there's reason to believe here that this is the case.) DS (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically: the image has been found on Flickr with a suitable license. The bot has been unable to verify this license's validity, and thus it must be verified by a human. COM:LL does not apply in this context. DS (talk) 12:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think "remove this template" means ? It's what I've been doing. If you feel it still meets deletion criteria, then you open the formal deletion request. DS (talk) 13:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foto con derechos de autor

Hola, Soy nuevo. Quisiera comentarte sobre la foto del político en la ciudad de México Víctor Hugo Lobo Román [[5]] ya que, yo tome esa fotografía y la subí bajo el consentimiento del político. ¿Que tengo que hacer? Muchas gracias por tu ayuda.Irvingmaximo (talk) 00:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick.

Photo by Rosh N.I.jpg was made by me on a smartphone from another photo taken many years ago in a photo,The photographs used are paid to the photographer and I am fully in right to use them publicly. Then it was used on the Internet on the website of honorary citizens, I am his son, he already died, How can we prove or fix it? thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiralnikto (talk • contribs) 10:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Tiralnikto (talk) 10:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Tiralnikto (talk) 09:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree deletion

Thank so much. You posted a message on my talk page, and I responded there. It is currently in the last subsection "Unfree license".

	Hello, Patrick Rogel. You have new messages at Nwbeeson's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nwbeeson (talk • contribs) 19:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting image

Hi Patrick Rogel, this image was copied from the internet by serial rights violator Nelatti. His modus operandi — in his own words — is " I just simply Google search the related image and download the first good copy I find regardless of source because of convenience". I have been trying for ages to get him to mend his way in the English Wikipedia, but despite three blocks, he simply carries on doing the same type of edits for which he has been blocked. Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 19:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions is in progress for File: Karen Adolph.jpg

File:Karen Adolph.jpg

File:Karen Adolph.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Similar to http://www.psych.nyu.edu/adolph/index.php?page=people

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Celizas (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am currently receiving the OTRS permissions. The photo was provided to me by Karen Adolph to upload onto Wikimedia Commons.Celizas (talk) 20:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elissa.jpg

I didn't really your issue with the image. the image I used is widely common on the web and you can find it on many websites without any issue concerning copyrights. Do you want me to take a photo for the actress myself to delete every shadow of a doubt of the copyrights?

Abinta.jpg deletion

Hi patrick. abinta.jpg was for a wikipedia article.The picture is copyright free.Please undo....

permission information for File:Fréset 9.jpg File:Fréset 8.jpg File:Fréset, Parc Montmorency à Bourbonne-les-Bains sous la neige, 1961, huile sur panneau.jpg

Hello Patrick.

Georges Fréset is a famous painter and also my great-grandfather. Those files (Fréset 9.jpg and Fréset 8.jpg) are paintings from my and my family's collection. I took the pictures. Shall I do something else?

One execption is the file "Parc Montmorency à Bourbonne-les-Bains sous la neige, 1961, huile sur panneau" which is my picture taken in the Bourbonne-les-Bains public Museum. I can delete it if required!

Thank you very much. Kind regards

Nicolas Namalric86

Hello Patrick. Does the files (Fréset 9.jpg and Fréset 8.jpg) are now under permission? I've seen "This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license." on the file page... So I can use it? A lot of other pictures are now deleted. I have sent a mail to COM:OTRS 1 week ago but the pictures are still unfindable. What can I do please? Thank you

Namalric86 (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete Deleted Photos

Dear Roger;

This photos have Licence CC 4.0, so I request to be restored, please. Thanks

References:

File:Conrado_Escobar.png : https://ias1.larioja.org/cex/sistemas/cmu/v3/consultaRecursoFicha.jsp?idSesionVirtual=7124a497c1ff0be9e842530567cd6b4ed5e8a254&f_intervalo=T&f_etiqueta=&f_calidades=-Imagen-&NPRE10020=&NPRE10030=&NPRE10040_SEP=,&NPRE10050=&NPRE10080=01/01/2015&NPRE10080_2=30/01/2017&NPRE10150=&NPRE10160=CC4.0&E050100=&dccobe=&dcocur=&dcocup=1&fichero=NPRE10&kint=NPRE10010&tarea=&modelo=P010&nfoto=&modoGestion=A&avanzada=NPRE10080%7CNPRE10080_2%7CNPRE10160&lMediaSel=L0210&cobes=467621&nhref=0

File:Emancipación UR.jpg : https://ias1.larioja.org/cex/sistemas/cmu/v3/consultaRecursoFicha.jsp?idSesionVirtual=b58eee2a44c59f2a6be14946e4cdf540080f03d7&f_intervalo=T&f_etiqueta=emancipaci%F3n&f_calidades=-Imagen-&NPRE10020=&NPRE10030=&NPRE10040_SEP=,&NPRE10050=&NPRE10080=&NPRE10080_2=&NPRE10150=&NPRE10160=&E050100=&dccobe=&dcocur=&dcocup=1&fichero=NPRE10&kint=NPRE10010&tarea=&modelo=P010&nfoto=&modoGestion=A&avanzada=&lMediaSel=&cobes=463140&nhref=1

--Wikitcher (talk) 11:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC) Wikitcher[reply]

Please do not delete all the images that I uploaded. I am working on an exception from my NDA that will allow me to publish the emails in which I was given permission to donate them to the public domain.

RE: File:Sarah T Stewart planetary scientist McArthur Fellow Sept 2018.jpg

Hi, Regarding the potential copyrighht violation, please see the explanation of licensing at File talk:Sarah T Stewart planetary scientist McArthur Fellow Sept 2018.jpg. Regards, -- Whpq (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I bought the license to use it for the actress Mirijam Verena Jeremic because I representing her. So please do not delete this image.

Enmanuel's files deletion request

Hi Patrick, did you see about this? I don't know about the result, but maybe this request was closed by the sysop with some mistakes. Taichi (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple files deleted

7 of my files have been deleted

File:Dida Single.jpg
File:玩轉.png
File:千面獸.jpg
File:Lara Sunshine.png
File:WDWG.jpg
File:梁心頤Hello.jpg
File:Cover梁心頤Hello.jpg

I am currently acting as proxy of the artists and company whose pages I am trying to update, so how would you propose I go about uploading these items? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longjiangmei (talk • contribs) 04:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Southernman robbie tour.jpg

Hi there. The photo you found it as has violated the copyright, is mine. It was taken with my phone, during the period I was Robbie's guide in Estonia. He asked me that time for my approve to post the picture on his website, so that is why you can see it there too. How can we manage the situation? Thanks ! AncaVes (talk) 06:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick,

The file Rachel Neaman, photo by Fenris Oswin.jpg is owned by me and I have the photographer's full permission to reproduce any of his photographs of me (he recently did a photo shoot with me). I wanted to credit him as the photographer but there is no issue with copyright.

Please do not delet this file.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCN 231 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elsa Hosk photos

Hi, You reported two photos that I added, claiming that they are without a license. I do not know where this information came from, but looking for a video on youtube.com, I deliberately marked in the filters a "commons license" and used screenshots from the video, which then appeared on the list.

In my opinion, everything is fine with the license.

--Anjaagnieszka (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please don't delete my photos Patrick Rogel or tell me the reason

Hello Patrick Rogel some days ago you reported my photo which i added to toren movie page i have the permission to use that photo by Mr. Nawzad Shekhany who is the director and the producer of the film or tell me the reason you reporting the photo please don't complicate the matter we you can contact me at amer.samoqi@gmail.com please don't restrict the knowledge we don't do this for any benefits and we are not doing this for ourselves Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir-Jundi (talk • contribs) 20:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please don't delete my photos Patrick Rogel or tell me the reason

Hello Patrick Rogel some days ago you reported my photo which i added to toren movie page i have the permission to use that photo by Mr. Nawzad Shekhany who is the director and the producer of the film or tell me the reason you reporting the photo please don't complicate the matter we you can contact me at amer.samoqi@gmail.com please don't restrict the knowledge we don't do this for any benefits and we are not doing this for ourselves Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir-Jundi (talk • contribs) 20:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:ElżBieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Poland-MIP-Europaparlament-by-Leila-Paul-1.jpg

Bist du dir da mit der Urheberverletzung ganz sicher? Das schaut mehr danach aus, dass 2018 ein Foto von Leila aus 2014 ohne Attribution verwendet wurde. Die Urheberschaft von Leila sollte außer Zweifel stehen, da es im Rahmen einen Parlamentprojektes erstellt wurde. Careerfromhome (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heil Rogel, Some rights reserved, Wiki

Heil, Rogel. Could You explain why are deleting and even tracking images on Kuzmanovic, when I have millions of viewers per day? All that millions are on same licence as this, it is OK exept if one users dicides that do beat it. Be or help in this, or not be at all.178.221.71.132 00:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of possible copyright violation for File:Adriano Espinola.jpg

Dear Patrick,

I've received a notification from you saying that could be a possible copyright violation from a photo that I submitted entitled Adriano Espinola.jpg. I'd like to kindly ask you to remove that mark since I'm the person who took that picture, therefore I own all the to rights to it.

If there is any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aefilho (talk • contribs) 02:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick,

Following your instructions I made a request via COM:OTRS.

The ticket is the following Ticket#2019040210007607

Is there anything else I have to do in order to prevent the image to be removed?

Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aefilho (talk • contribs) 16:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of File:2010s collage mockup draft.jpg

You tagged File:2010s collage mockup draft.jpg, which I uploaded, as missing adequate permissions. As the file description says, it's a collage mockup (for the purposes of a talk page conversation) derived solely from freely-licensed Commons files, all of which are unambiguously identified by filename in the description. Maybe I mistagged the upload somehow (I'm not super experienced on Commons), but I don't see how there could be a licensing problem with a file derived from freely licensed sources that are all explicitly identified. It would be nice if the image wasn't deleted, since it's a draft of a potential lead image and is under discussion on en:Talk:2010s. If there's anything I can do to clear this up I'm happy to do so, but the request for OTRS permission doesn't make a lot of sense given the context. ZX95 (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Queen Ahoy

The image shown on the wikipedia page is not owned by the writer - patrick myers. He has supplied the image and others to the Iconsfestial site as they have a gig there later in 2019. Icons do not have a claim to the copyright. It has been part of the publicity pack for several years - the Iconsfestival website only went online in 2018.

Hi further to your reply - the icons site was given the image to use freely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrickmyers71 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kind regards

Patrick Myers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrickmyers71 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I Own The Copyright

Hello, I would like you to undelete this file because it is my picture and I own the full rights to it. I am Princess Vitarah's photographer and social media manager. I have full copyrights to this photo. I have been managing her Wikipedia since 2017. You have marked two of my pictures for deletion, I don't understand. If you need me to prove I have rights to this photo you can email at booking@princessvitarah.com that is my official email address. Yes the photo is on Twitter because she posted it there, but it still belongs to us and we have uploaded it to Creative Commons and dont mind if anyone else uses it. --Johnabook (talk) 11:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Correct reference is mentioned

Dear Patrick, Hi, Due to your comment on my file reference, after exact search for its reference finally I found its main reference and I mentioned it in last upload. The reference is: https://fa.shafaqna.com/news/127392/ You can see original photo in this address. Thank you very much. Yaser

[1] ttps://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%E1%BB%83_C%C3%B4ng

[2] ttps://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%A2u_l%E1%BA%A1c_b%E1%BB%99_b%C3%B3ng_%C4%91%C3%A1_Long_An

[1]

[2]