User talk:Nicoasc
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Ramdohranstalt.jpg is uncategorized since 28 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Kregt6.jpg is uncategorized since 22 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Suhr132.jpg is uncategorized since 4 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Knoetel48.jpg is uncategorized since 4 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Menin1794Huck,JohGerhard,Han1799.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Rud Georg Wilh von Hammerstein, General Lieut1798.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Baumgruppe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Jedudědek (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this picture is copyrighted, because its just a screenshot of a auction-page showing a reproduction of this old painting
Please helb in finding a better copyright declaration
Greets
nicoasc
- Sorry, no way. The painter died in 1962 and her works are protected until end of 2032.--Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Stillleben1914.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Jedudědek (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Fähre in vegesack1925.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Jedudědek (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this picture is copyrighted, because its just a screenshot of a auction-page showing a reproduction of this old painting
Please helb in finding a better copyright declaration
Greets
nicoasc
- Sorry, no way. The painter died in 1962 and her works are protected until end of 2032.--Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Margarethe von Reinken.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Jedudědek (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this picture is copyrighted, because its just a screenshot of a auction-page showing a reproduction of this old painting
Please helb in finding a better copyright declaration
Greets
nicoasc
- Sorry, no way. The painter died in 1962 and her works are protected until end of 2032.--Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Daniela von Reinken.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Jedudědek (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think this picture is copyrighted, because its just a screenshot of a auction-catalog showing a reproduction of this old painting
Please helb in finding a better copyright declaration
Greets
nicoasc
- Sorry, but if original non-free, derivative work is non-free too :-( Jedudědek (talk) 12:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Katalog von Reinken.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File:GrauerTag.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden. |
Vielen Dank, dass du Image:Westf.Husar.1812.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben.
Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen. Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben spätestens eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen. Solltest du Fragen hierzu haben, stelle sie bitte im deutschsprachigen Forum oder dem mehrsprachigen Help desk. Für schnellere Antworten empfiehlt sich der Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC (Direktzugriff)! Vielen Dank. |
Source data are incomplete.Túrelio (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden. |
Vielen Dank, dass du Image:Unif.westf.hus.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben.
Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen. Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben spätestens eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen. Solltest du Fragen hierzu haben, stelle sie bitte im deutschsprachigen Forum oder dem mehrsprachigen Help desk. Für schnellere Antworten empfiehlt sich der Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC (Direktzugriff)! Vielen Dank. |
Source data are incomplete.Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Diese Datei könnte gelöscht werden. |
Vielen Dank, dass du Image:HoherOffiz 1 westphalian cuirassiers 1812.jpg hochgeladen hast. Leider gibt die Beschreibungsseite nicht an, wer den Inhalt erstellt hat, daher ist der Urheberrechts-Status unklar. Falls du den Inhalt selbst erstellt hast, vermerke dies bitte auf der Beschreibungsseite (siehe Lizenzbausteine weiter unten). Falls der Inhalt nicht von dir selbst stammt, musst du begründen, warum er auf den Commons verwendet werden darf, und angeben, woher die Datei stammt, z. B. mit einem Link zur Ursprungsseite und zu den Nutzungsbedingungen dort. Falls es sich um eine Bearbeitung handelt, musst du die Namen und eine Lizenz der ursprünglichen Autoren mit angeben.
Falls das Medium nicht mit einem Lizenzbaustein ausgezeichnet ist, musst du unbedingt einen hinzufügen. Wenn du das Bild, die Audiodatei oder das Video selbst erstellt hast, kannst du den Baustein {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} für die Creative Commons Lizenz oder {{PD-self}} für Gemeinfreiheit setzen. Siehe Commons:Lizenzvorlagen für die komplette Liste der nutzbaren Lizenzen und den dazugehörigen Lizenzbausteinen. Bitte beachte, dass alle Bilder ohne Quellen- und/oder Lizenzangaben spätestens eine Woche nach dem Hochladen gelöscht werden. Dies kannst du auf der Seite Richtlinien zum Löschen nachlesen. Falls du noch andere Dateien hochgeladen hast, überprüfe bitte auch, ob dort Quellen- und Urheberinformationen angegeben sind. Du kannst alle von dir hochgeladenen Bilder mit dem Galerie-Tool ansehen. Solltest du Fragen hierzu haben, stelle sie bitte im deutschsprachigen Forum oder dem mehrsprachigen Help desk. Für schnellere Antworten empfiehlt sich der Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC (Direktzugriff)! Vielen Dank. |
Source data are incomplete.Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:Ludwigramdohr.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Ludwigramdohr.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Ludwigramdohr.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Cannot be PD if from 1947.Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Nicoasc,
there are some inconsistencies with this image. In the description you write it's "public domain", but then you've licensed it under CC. Also, the date is given as 2004, but that's hardly the date of the photo.--Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tûrelio, well, sorry for my inadequate description.
This is an old photo of my Grandpa, crossing from Bremen, Germany, to Brazil in approx. 1929. I took a picture from it with MY digital camera - and this the result, i.e. the uploaded file. SO WHO HAS THE COPYRIGHT? My GRandpa? It's o.k. with him. For my part, it's o.k. with me.
Greetings :-) Nicoasc
- Hallo Nicoasc,
- kannst du diese Ergänzungen noch in die Bildbeschreibung einfügen. Dein Opa hat sicher nicht das Copyright daran, weil er das Bld ja kaum selbst gemacht hat. Hat er die Reise mit seinen Eltern gemacht? Dann könnte die es aufgenommen haben. Das wäre für die Erlaubtheit auch günstiger, weil ein professionaller Photograph, der 1929 ein Photo gemacht hat, nicht unbedingt schon seit >70 Jahren tod sein muss. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
In the description of this image you've written "Photo by uploader" and "Date: 1890". Thereby you are surely the oldest Commons-contributor ... --Túrelio (talk) 21:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tûrelio, sorry for my inadequate description.
This is an old photo of my Grandpas Photo memorail album, showing his mother's family in 1890. I took a picture from it with MY digital camera - and this the result, i.e. the uploaded file. SO WHO HAS THE COPYRIGHT? My GRandpa? It's o.k. with him. For my part, it's o.k. with me.
Greetings :-) Nicoasc
File tagging File:Paulramdohr.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Paulramdohr.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paulramdohr.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kam Solusar (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Entwickl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Die Künstler leben noch. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Marsch_des_Kurhannoverschen_Dragoner_Regiments_von_Ramdohr.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—innotata 15:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Marsch_des_Dragoner-Regiments_von_Ramdohr.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—innotata 15:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Zitat vs. FOP
[edit]Hallo Nicoasc, zu deiner Änderung: wir können uns nicht auf das Zitatrecht oder fair use berufen, da unsere Dateien hier nicht in einen festen Kontext eingebettet sind. Außerdem ist es ausdrücklich nicht mit dem Projektziel der freien Verwendbarkeit vereinbar (siehe COM:L). Wir können hingegen die Panoramafreiheit nutzen - kannst du aber genauer beschreiben, wo das Gemälde sich dort befindet? Ist es öffentlich zugänglich? Ist es genau jenes, von dem das Foto hier hochgeladen ist? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Saibo, du hast hier recht -- ich bin erstmal davon ausgegangen, dass es nur diese eine Ikone gibt. Stimmt aber nicht, es gibt mindestens 3 davon, wie man in entsprechenden Meldungen der Zeitungen bei geneuem Hinsehen feststellen kann. Also kann ich jetzt nicht mit Sicherheit sagen, ob es genau jenes Bild ist, um dass es hier geht. Werde selber mal da hin fahren und auf Panoramafreiheit prüfen. Sind denn religiöse Ikonenbilder auch im Urheberrecht inbegriffen? Grüße --Nicoasc
- Danke für deine Hilfe! Nun, wenn es wirklich (möglichst von jemand dazu berechtigten) dauerhaft, öffentlich ausgestellt ist, dann gilt die Panoramafreiheit (zumindest) für (diese) Version. Also am besten einfach zwei Fotos machen: eines von weiter weg, damit man die Umgebung sieht und eines als Repro, dann beide nacheinander unter einem Dateinamen hochladen.
- Ikonenbilder sind meines Wissens nach nicht ausgenommen - allerdings kommt es hier ja schon des Öfteren vor, dass sie sehr alt sind und der Künstler schon mehr als 70 Jahre tot ist (im Falle von Deutschland). Wenn dem so ist, dann sind sie natürlich auch frei reproduzierbar. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Alexanderkraell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Widerborst (talk) 08:59, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Richard Aster in Der Oberschlesische Wanderer, 1938, Jg. 110, Nr. 43, S.5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
File:H-O.Ramdohr, STAF d SA-Stand22 Gleiwtz 1938.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 10:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
File:H-Otto.Ramdohr, STAF SA-Stand271 Hindenbg 1935.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
File:H-O.Ramdor 1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 10:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Horne, Epitaph Balduin Voss.jpg
[edit]
Wdwd (talk) 13:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Tribbe Osnabr 1611.jpg
[edit]
Wdwd (talk) 13:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Schmorell grab.jpg
[edit]Hallo, der Verweis http://home.arcor.de/nicoasc/ auf deiner Benutzerseite funktioniert leider nicht; ich weiß daher nicht, welche Sprachen du verstehst. Aber da du deinem Bild Schmorell grab.jpg eine deutsche Beschreibung gegeben hast, nehme ich an, dass du Deutsch verstehst.
Das Bild (von 2010) hat einen deutlichen Stich ins Rosa, und wie die Bäume im Hintergrund zeigen, stammt er nicht von dem Grabstein, sondern von einem zu starken Ausgleich der grün-betonten Umgebung. Das lässt sich ganz gut korrigieren, ohne allzu viel Qualität zu verlieren. Ich kann das machen und das Ergebnis entweder als neue Version der Datei oder unter einem neuen Namen (natürlich mit dir als ursprünglichem Autor) hochladen – oder du machst es selbst. Wie wäre es dir lieber? Da ich jetzt eine Kategorie zu dem Grab angelegt habe, „sticht“ das Rosa etwas heraus.
–– Renardo la vulpo (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)leider
- Hallo Renardo,
- Danke für die Nachricht. Gerne kannst du Verbesserungen an besagtem Bild vornehmen, wie vorgeschlagen.
- Viele Grüße, nicoasc Nicoasc (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Liloramdohr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |