User talk:Moheen/Archive 2018

Archives 2013-14 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-22 2023

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Bonna Mirza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

File:SIGNY.jpg removal

Someone needs to explain to me why this was a violation. The author and band member uploaded the photo to flickr. They gave it a proper license for wikimedia, 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0), per wikimedia rules. I added it here. What do I tell the band and photographer? I'm sort of at a loss on what to tell them to do. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

 Done. @Fyunck(click): I have uploaded the original file from Flickr. Thanks. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I actually emailed the band. Per the band, the photographer of the photo and a band member sat together and uploaded the photo to flickr. They added all the camera info from his camera. They used a SIGNY band member flickr account. I have no idea if the flickr account was just created for this one upload. I had asked them for a photo for an article i created. I just wanted you to understand what the situation is. If there is anything else they could add to the flickr photo I will gladly ask them. I would just need to know exactly what to ask them. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

SIGNY.jpg

On File:SIGNY.jpg, you deleted my copyvio notice without opening a deletion request. I have done this now, since there is OTRS ticket number listed. --Elisfkc (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Najib Tareque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Hasive • talk • 12:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Meher Afroz Shaon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Stanychno-Luhanskyj rayon prapor.png

Why do you rename this file? Previous name was more correct then current.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Ahonc: Per request as an "obvious error". Stanychno-Luhanskiy rayon, mentioned in the description. If have more concern between Luganskiy and Luhanskyj, please clear it first. Thanks. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Azmeri Haque Badhon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Azmeri Haque Badhon (1).jpg: 0
2. Azmeri Haque Badhon (2).jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Azmeri Haque Badhon (1).jpg: Declined.
File:Azmeri Haque Badhon (2).jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 19:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

New photo

Dear Moheen Reeyad! Can you find photo of Puneeth Rajkumar from site Bollywood Hungama example from latest events? Thank you! --178.66.215.37 17:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Ganesh Haloi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Jannatul Nayeem Avril.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support User:SazzadHossain, ~Moheen, i added some contrats, and put it into RGB space, it was uncalibrated. Hope fine, nice image. --Mile (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment OK to me. Thanks. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Courtney (model) 11.jpg

And also:

• File:Courtney (model) 3.jpg
• File:Courtney (model) 5.jpg
• File:Courtney (model) 9.jpg

Yours sincerely, Afifa Afrin (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your uploads

Hi, Tm is targetting your uploads again, see e.g. here. Jcb (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Nargis Fakhri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
  • "global" usage is the word...--Jebulon (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Nawazuddin Siddiqui.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikki Galrani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Probably best in scope, in part because of her expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Naila Nayem at Dhaka 2017 (cropped).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Naila Nayem.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Asking for deletion of a category

Hi Moheen, please delete this category that was mistakenly created: Category:Reisetipendium Frankfuter Buchmesse 2015 (supported by Wikimedia Deutschland). Thanks! --Kritzolina (talk) 11:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@Kritzolina:  Done. ~Moheen Ree ^{(keep talking)} 11:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Valentina Nappi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best In Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Eva Green.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Used and useful; good image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Jessia Islam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I was suggesting the uncropped version of this photo, but I'm happy with this one, which is much nicer than the other, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Jessia Islam in Dhaka 01 (cropped).jpg: +1 <--
2. Jessia Islam in Dhaka 03 cropped.jpg: 0 
=>
File:Jessia Islam in Dhaka 01 (cropped).jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Jessia Islam in Dhaka 03 cropped.jpg: Declined.

---- DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Sabnam Faria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, useful and used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 19:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Priyanka Sarkar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Saayoni at a promotional event.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Saayoni Ghosh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brahma, Prehistoric & Archeological Gallery, Chittagong University Museum..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shiva of Gajan festival, Prehistoric & Archeological Gallery, Chittagong University Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment only one link to a category --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
• @Archaeodontosaurus: Fixed ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good photo Voltmetro 07:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Charity logo deleted

Hello. I uploaded our charity's logo here and I want to create a Wikipedia page for our charity as well. I just wondering why you delete my uploaded file or what should I do to keep it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suncom666 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Per Commons:Licensing, there was no permission. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

So could you give me a little more instructions on how can I get the permission? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suncom666 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Suncom666: You can collect permission via COM:OTRS from the original creator of the specific file. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kokamukha Durga, Prehistoric & Archeological Gallery, Chittagong University Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support useful Voltmetro 00:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manasa, Prehistoric & Archeological Gallery, Chittagong University Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support useful Voltmetro 00:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Template:PD-GermanGov/bn

Hello. This template needs to be updated according to the actual German copyright law. The law does not distinguish between federal, state or communal levels of government when it comes to "official works", but official works issued by any type of government and courts of law in Germany are in the public domain. I mentioned this both at the template talk page and at the Village Pump and did not get any objections, so I went ahead and edited most of the translations. Can you please edit the Bengali version? De728631 (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

@De728631: Is it look OK now? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Judging from Google Translator it looks ok. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 17:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Deleting Rott.png

Good day Moheen Reeyad

Thanks for deleting the file. As I explained to User:Ronhjones , I have the bottle of wine at home. I bought it. I'm however ethical and legal and if any rights were violated then I'm respecting it. I removed it from the page when User:Ronhjones told me. I don't know how to delete the image and have ask User:Ronhjones help. Thanks for doing it

Regards

User:Barry Ne

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Pori Moni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Moushumi Hamid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:MacKenzie Meehan (16202249986).jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 21:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:MacKenzie Meehan (16202249986).jpg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of original artwork for scientific model

Hi Moheen,

I am working with small group of people to put up a Bioelectricity wikipedia page, in order for the general public to have working knowledge of this very important scientific field. An artist that works with us, Jeremy Guay has recently uploaded a couple of images that you created himself (with instruction of Mike Levin, who we both work for) onto the wiki commons space. One of the images was immediately deleted and it was cited as a copyright violation. Though in the article where this image is, Jeremy Guay is given credit for creating this photo. How can we go about releasing rights on wiki commons? Can you please tell us exactly what is wrong with the image, so we can correct this?

The photo in question is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ion_channels,_electrical_synapses_%E2%80%93_Neural,_Developmental.png&action=edit&redlink=1

Thank you for your help, Tia Harrison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiadeeharrison (talk • contribs) 16:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

@Tiadeeharrison: Derived from copyrighted image. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

@Moheen Reeyad How is it copyrighted material if it is original artwork that was uploaded by the person who created it? On the journal article that you reference, Jeremy Guay is given credit for creating the image and he is the person who uploaded it onto wiki commons. Please explain to me how it is copyrighted, thank you.

@Tiadeeharrison: For further discussion please go whit this page. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

My deleted account

Please Sir, i have been notified of your deletion of my page, Ekemini Otung. Please, how can go about getting the page back.

I wish to be on wikipedia.

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 154.160.23.237 (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Bollywood Hungama

Hi, It would help greatly if you provide the exact correct link. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: OK. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Dear Sir, What's the problem of my image? Can you tell me the reason? If you tell me, I will aware next time. Sayed Bin Huda (talk) 12:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Sayed Bin Huda: Please read here. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

noura ghazi jpg

i have the full consent to have noura ghazi picture uysed on her wikipedia page by herself what do i need to do to get the copyright issue sorted? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.136.157.243 (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Duck Butter Poster

You removed the updated poster for the film "Duck Butter." This new poster has an artist credit, John Wesley, so we would like that version to stay on the page. Please do not delete. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brigademkting (talk • contribs) 13:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of files

Good day Moheen Reeyad

I have requested User:ManFromNord to delete a list of my files.

Thank You

User:Barry Ne

Files from Hasive

A few dozen DRs you created for Hasive (talk · contribs).

As this user appears to mostly upload photos of people who are in scope, how do you know the ones you nominated were out of scope? For example, if Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dulal Ahmed Chowdhury.jpg was actually Dulal Ahmed Chowdhury, Chief News Editor of Bangla Tribune, that's probably in scope. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 09:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: How? There is more than thousand journalist in the country; obviously, all of them are not notable. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

One thousand is really not that much. Any of them that work for a major news outlet I would consider to be in scope. Not in Wikipedia article scope, but the scope of Commons goes far beyond that. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 10:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

tile wisdom

Hi, why did you delete the image of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tile_wisdom.png ?

It was my own image so I do not understand why it would not be CC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synethos (talk • contribs) 14:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC) --Synethos (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

@Synethos: It was found by this link, which is Copyvio. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:48, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Rezwana Choudhury Bannya.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

about-deletion req for File:Siamuzzaman Mahin.jpg and File:Official Author Writer Blogger.jpg

File:Siamuzzaman Mahin.jpg File:Official Author Writer Blogger.jpg

hi, i have two images of a Bengali Writer and blogger. and i need these images to write article about him. i have copyright to do this. please allow me to do it. 1-https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Siamuzzaman_Mahin.jpg 2-https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Official_Author_Writer_Blogger.jpg --Humanist sam (talk) 12:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Siamuzzaman Mahin

@Humanist sam: উইকিমিডিয়া কমন্স কোন ওয়েব হোস্ট নয়। অব্যবহৃত ব্যক্তিগত ছবি থাকলে তা এখানে অপসারণ করা হয়। --Aftabuzzaman (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

File deletion - Peerless Network logo

Hi Moheen,

My name is Safaque and I am a beginner in contributing to Wikipedia. I had created a page called Peerless Network and realized you deleted the logo today morning due to some copyright issue. I uploaded the logo to WikiCommons using the Upload Wizard. I am a freelancer at Peerless and they have granted me the permission to use their logo.

Please help me how do I rectify this? It will help me in my future contributions to Wikipedia. Your guidance will be appreciated. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Safaque (talk • contribs) 17:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

@Safaque: Hello, The uploaded file is a copyright violation because this media is a logo which are always presumed to be copyrighted unless they are too simple to be copyrightable. It will be good if you upload a logo with a permission via COM:OTRS from the original creator. If anything confusing, please do not hesitate to ask. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

@Moheen: Hi, The OTRS mail has to be sent by me or the creator? Later, how can I upload the file using Upload Wizard? Do I have to select 'Not my work', include the source and select Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International?

Besides, if some company has media mentions on one name and then their company name has changed so does that nullify the press clippings? Do they still stand a chance for Wiki? Thanks! Safaque (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC) June 4, 2018

@Safaque: Yes. Please see this example. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of logo image

Hi Moheen,
I don't agree on the deletion of File:Qualcomm.jpg: It's a text logo clearly below Threshold of originality and therefore it's not subject to copyright law no matter if the source websites say "all rights reserved" or not. This logo should be restored. Best regards. --Zaccarias (talk) 09:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Zaccarias: OK. Restored, and started a discussion here. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. --Zaccarias (talk) 13:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

File:BSicon_ePUMPHOUSE.svg → File:BSicon_exPUMPHOUSE.svg

Thank you for performing the move. However, I was wondering why you didn't also do  (ePUMPHOUSEl) and  (ePUMPHOUSEr) at the same time. Thank you. Useddenim (talk) 11:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@Useddenim: Good day! You are welcome. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 11:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Foundation Stone, Chattagram Kalabhaban.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vitascope.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitascope.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bistaar Logo 2014.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Olivier LPB 07:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Rubey.jpg

I'm wondering if you may have processed this one a little too hastily. Did you consider my comment at all? —LX (talk, contribs) 09:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@LX: Sorry for the inconvenience! Thanks for the notice. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! However, now it looks like you restored an older revision, which is definitely a copyright violation with a prominent Getty Images watermark. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@LX: OK. File visibility has been changed for copyvio. Thanks again. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

file restore request

hy Moheen Reeyad, I'm writing to ask you if you could please restore the following files:

• File:Stemma Matrimoniale della Famiglia dei Colonna e dei della Rovere.jpg
• File:Stemma Matrimoniale dei Colonna e dei Tomacelli.jpg
• File:Stemma Matrimoniale tra i Colonna e gli orsini.jpg
• File:Stemma Colonnesco nella Sala del Capitano.jpg
• File:Stemma Matrimoniale tra i Visconti Sforza e i Principi Colonna.JPG
• File:Stampa di Stemma Colonnesco.JPG
• File:Stemma dei Principi Colonna dipinto a mano.jpg
• File:Stemma dei Colonna dipinto su una Panca.jpg
• File:Stemma Principesco dei Colonna con Aquila Bicipite.jpg
• File:Decorazione Araldica della famiglia Colonna su Soffitto.jpg
• File:Stemma dei Colonna Romano.jpg
• File:Ex Libri dei principi Colonna con Sirena Bicude.jpg
• File:Stemma Colonnesco del Palazzo Colonna Orsini.JPG
• File:Stemma dei Principi Colonna di Porta Romana.JPG
• File:Stemma dei Colonna in San Giovanni in Laterano.jpg
• File:Dipinto Raffigurante lo stemma della Famiglia Colonna.jpg
• File:Arazzo con Stemma Gentilizio dei Principi Colonna.jpg
• File:Stemma Colonna Barberini di Sciarra.JPG
• File:Stemma Ducale di Fabrizio I Colonna.JPG
• File:Stemma Colonnesco a Castelvecchio.jpg
• File:Lastra Decorata con Stemma Colonnesco e Angelo.JPG
• File:Stemma Colonnesco in Pietra.JPG
• File:Lastra con Stemma Cardinalizio dei Colonna.JPG
• File:Aquila Bicipite con Stemma Colonnesco e Sirena Bicude.JPG
• File:Stemma Colonnesco nel Palazzo di Pofi.jpg
• File:Mosaico con stemma dei Colonna.jpg
• File:Stemma dei Colonna.jpg
• File:Decorazione Artistica con Scudo dei Colonna.jpg
• File:Acquila Bicipite con stemma dei colonna Pamphilli.JPG
• File:Caminetto Decorato lo lo stemma dei Colonna Barberini.jpg

--82.50.38.189 15:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

It was mentioned all files are created by an abuser. So? It will be good to know you if you logged in with a username. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Jennifer French

Could you please clarify how File:Jennifer French Headshot 2018.jpg is a copyright violation if File:Jennifer French at Alpha-One.jpg, the photo it was cropped from, isn't? There's been an ongoing edit war on French's article because some people feel that the "Alpha-One" photo isn't appropriately reflective of her role as an MPP — but if a photo has been uploaded here as CC/own work, then cropping it to remove the parts of the photo that are leading editors to get into a war over it has to be on the menu of allowable options. CC permits derivatives of CC work, so there's no way the cropped photo can be deemed a copyright violation if the original photo isn't. Bearcat (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, never mind. I didn't notice that somebody had tried to replace the cropped headshot with a different upload that was a copyright violation, and that the cropped headshot is still on Commons. Sorry for the confusion. Bearcat (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

To Bearcat et al, we represent the office of this politician with me specifically being the Chief of Staff. We have been attempting to update this photo with her most recent headshot for weeks, with apparent copyright violations of what is our owned property that we want to release freely onto this Wikipedia article. Can either of you elaborate as to what we’re doing wrong? Thank you JeepRhyme (talk) 22:13, 24 June 2018 (EDT)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armin Steigenberger at East Delta University (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I would apply more contrast to your B&W images, they look a bit flat. --Basotxerri 12:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armin Steigenberger at East Delta University (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Helena Hill Weed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Eva Le Gallienne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Carl Benjamin, 2016.jpg

Regarding your deletion of File:Carl Benjamin, 2016.jpg, it might have had a wrong rationale, I don't know about that, but it was not a copyright violation. It is covered by {{YouTube CC-BY}}. Wumbolo (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

@Wumbolo: It was uploaded by {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} tag. So, I restored this, you can proceed. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Recently deleted article due to copyright

Hello, One of my images of a LEGO set and box were removed because of copyright. I'm assuming this is because LEGO boxes are not allowed to be uploaded because they are not public domain? I just want to make sure what the rules are as another image I uploaded of just the set was allowed to stay, and I don't want to inadvertently upload more copyrighted or not public domain material. Thanks, Fritzmann2002 (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Britain for Europe Logo.jpg

Can you tell me why was this deleted? It is a fair use of a campaign logo. Shouldn't I have been notified that there was a discussion about it? --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

• @The Vintage Feminist: I have started a discussion. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Maude Adams.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - What makes this best in scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Do you have another choice? If so, you could start MVR. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
•  CommentFor me, I consider it is the best in scope but I prefer the previous version of the 29th March 2015. Your new version is not so natural. That's the best in scope for me because the portrait is very fine and the quality is better than the others. --PJDespa (talk) 12:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Reverted to previous version. Thanks for your concern. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope This picture as I wrote previously is the best in the scope. --PJDespa (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armin Steigenberger at East Delta University (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Edie Brickell image - improperly done?

Can you tell me why the image of Edie Brickell was deleted? The owner of the image gave full permission for the picture to be used for any purpose. Was it the belief that the editor of the image was falsely claiming to have ownership permission, or was there a rush to judgment, or are there rules that says that even if an owner gives permission, a photo cannot be posted in Wikimedia Commons if... (fill in the blank, because I am at a loss why)? Mburrell (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

@Mburrell: Lets go with DR. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

When I visited the image page after a deletion proposal was posted on the Edie Brickell talk page, I saw that the poster had made several edits, such as removing listing of Instagram as a source and listing the photographer and calling it out as owner supplied, stating that the poster talked to the owner and updated the legal permissions on the page. After there was a deletion request, the poster jumped through some hoops (or falsely edited the page to say it was done, that I don't know) and then the image was deleted based on the original request and not on what was stated on the image page. When I visited the image page, the original editor had deleted the deletion warning template, so the link you provided is the first I saw of the deletion request page, which I tried to get to. My mistake was when going through the edit history of the image page, not clicking the button on the deletion template that was available in edit history. However, I still think the image was deleted in haste and should be discussed to determine if the poster had permission from the owner, or just typed whatever looked good. Is the image permanently gone, or in Wiki-purgatory? Can a discussion be started? How can one investigate actual permissions? Is this a lessons-learned for next time? Mburrell (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bistaar Arts Complex, sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but it needs more specific categories (subject) --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)  Support I added the categories myself --Daniel Case 03:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Amy (8147773134).jpg

And also:

• File:Amy (8325722008).jpg
• File:Courtney (model) 11.jpg
• File:Courtney (model) 3.jpg
• File:Courtney (model) 5.jpg
• File:Courtney (model) 9.jpg
• File:Elizabeth (15951480837).jpg
• File:Emma (14757726264).jpg
• File:Emma (15159030666).jpg
• File:Emma (15280381533).jpg
• File:Emma (15755661795).jpg
• File:Emma (16066216678).jpg
• File:Fingertips (15193795353).jpg
• File:For The Love Of Light (21845670394).jpg
• File:From the Other Side (15178053353).jpg
• File:Gemma (19814967100).jpg
• File:Gemma (8172703449).jpg
• File:Georgina Anneliese (15789770648).jpg
• File:Hanna (16159241198).jpg
• File:Hannah (15744070383).jpg
• File:Hannah (16187418189).jpg
• File:Jo Louise (21247600920).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (15619448688).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (15691807357).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (16205316216).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (19586443758).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (19619014330).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (19797046042).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (20228491101).jpg
• File:Jo-Louise (20233239486).jpg
• File:Karolina (16470934772).jpg
• File:Kristina (20009127710).jpg
• File:Kristina (20221479352).jpg
• File:Lake Placid (16145154600).jpg
• File:Laying in Wait (15806309413).jpg
• File:Lyme Regis (20254149496).jpg
• File:Mollie (15329269391).jpg
• File:Near Cerne Abbas (18239208839).jpg
• File:Near Cerne Abbas (18417647749).jpg
• File:Only Fingertips (15822250212).jpg
• File:Roseanne (7415379842).jpg
• File:Rosie (14348490086).jpg
• File:Rosie (14895674806).jpg
• File:Rosie Robinson (14498766363).jpg
• File:Rosie Robinson (15951676316).jpg
• File:Rosie Robinson (16409947793).jpg
• File:Rosie Robinson (16840886790).jpg
• File:Rosie Robinson (19557891608).jpg
• File:Rosie Robinson (19979392721).jpg
• File:Softer Than Silk (15887173786).jpg
• File:Sunday Morning (22123122933).jpg
• File:The Outside Looking In (15414554654).jpg
• File:The Portal Back In Time That Is Corfe Station (20971625750).jpg
• File:Unusual Perspective (15696955187).jpg
• File:Window Flower (16209673537).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please check the file

Please once have a look at a file File:Pragya jaiswal at IIFA Utsavam.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashwini Gadade (talk • contribs) 16:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bangladeshi woman celebrating Pohela Boishakh festival (13915503209).jpg

And also:

• File:Boat Ride (20294655986).jpg
• File:Dariabanda, Rural Games of Bangladesh (9960939943).jpg
• File:Dark side of the sun (7989577499).jpg
• File:Eching Beching, Childhood Games (9961647606).jpg
• File:Eching Beching, Rural Games of Bangladesh (9960817503).jpg
• File:Known face (8651223540).jpg
• File:Mysterious Island in Bangladesh (20134446029).jpg
• File:Pahela Baishakh costumes (8693805564).jpg
• File:Pohela Falgun (16623454072).jpg
• File:River Grabbing (8397493417).jpg
• File:Street shop (8395957882).jpg
• File:Unidentified location of Bangladesh (13625731955).jpg
• File:Unidentified river of Bangladesh (20312544802).jpg
• File:Waiting for passenger (20132890710).jpg
• File:Without Rudder (20132905970).jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

deletion of movie poster

hey, permission is underway via the ORST permission system via the original copyright holder - the statement mail will arrive in the next few days

Hanzone (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Meher Afroz Shaon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I prefer this one. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Me too. Even though the colour is not as good, the crop is better for a portrait.--Peulle (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support better choice --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Meher Afroz Shaon in Dhaka Lit Fest 2017 (01).jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope)
2. Meher Afroz Shaon (12) (cropped).jpg: +3 <--
=>
File:Meher Afroz Shaon in Dhaka Lit Fest 2017 (01).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Meher Afroz Shaon (12) (cropped).jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 17:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Backyard, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wash basins, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 13:04, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robbene Iland, Portal (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 13:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Communal toilets, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Communal toilets, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robben Island Primary School, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope and used. -- Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Kareena_UNICEF14.jpg

Hello, I was asked by Túrelio to discuss this matter with you. The following image was tagged by you for deletion stating that it was a "screenshot, wallpaper or promotional poster". I'm just a little confused as the image was taken at a UNICEF event in India by a Bollywood Hungama photographer. I was the main editor who was responsible for talking to Bollywood Hungama and in the end we obtained this license. I haven't had a problem with any of the pictures I have uploaded so far. Please explain. Thanks -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 03:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

@BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ: Bollywood Hungama grants permission to copy from a Bollywood party or event in India; here this imagecom/news/features/kareena-kapoor-launches-child-friendly-schools-for-unicef/ image] was taken from "news/features/" category. So this permission does not extend. Thanks. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Communal toilets, Robben Island Maximum Security Prison.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2018

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

(UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Section B courtyard, Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, west-east axis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Shame about the shadow, still in scope, useful and used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biplab Anand at Wikimania 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Christendom Wins 2017 NSCRO Rugby National Championship.jpg

Moheen Reeyad, I just restored a file you very recently deleted, File:Christendom Wins 2017 NSCRO Rugby National Championship.jpg. That file was temporarily undeleted in order that OTRS could verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710010535. See Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Christendom_Wins_2017_NSCRO_Rugby_National_Championship.jpg. OTRS hasn't indicated at COM:UNDEL that they've had a chance to look at the temporarily undeleted file, so you'd be doing me a favor if you don't delete it again. Thanks. —RP88 (talk) 16:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Unless, of course, you deleted it for having failed an OTRS permission check? If so please leave a note at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Christendom_Wins_2017_NSCRO_Rugby_National_Championship.jpg. —RP88 (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Welcome sign, Boulders Penguin Colony.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Is this valuable? Charles (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Don't think so? Well, as I have seen, there's the only welcome sign in that place within a good scope. Thanks for your openion.
•  Support - Seems like a useful scope to me, and best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Govinda Gunalanker Hostel at University of Chittagong (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Section B, Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, back, north-south exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

suppression de fichier

Bonjour, tu as supprimé ce fichier File:Qui va gagner le pompon Op 2818m.jpg, mais je suis l'auteur donc j'ai le droit d'importer cette image sur Commons. Merci de la recréer.--Macassar (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Macassar: This file was a copyright violation for the following reason: Online comic, not own work. Êtes-vous sûr d'avoir le copyright? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Complètement sûr d'avoir le copyright, je suis l'auteur, je suis dessinateur, j'ai une galerie sur flickr.--Macassar (talk) 17:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Commons:File:Shawn Andrews (actor).png

Hello, you deleted my file. Please put it back. An email to OTRS was already sent and it is currently pending OTRS, thank you. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shawn_Andrews_(actor) Reriksenus (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Reriksenus: Could you put the OTRS ticket number here? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Moheen Reeyad: Here it is Ticket#: 2018081310000794 Please let me know if I did something wrong and how I can do it better next time Reriksenus (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Grupo_Desportivo_Águias_de_Camarate.png

Hi, I notice that you deleted the logo of a football club. I followed every rule and tried to upload it just like all the other football clubs did in their wikipedia pages. Like: "https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_Madrid_Club_de_F%C3%BAtbol" and "https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_Lisboa_e_Benfica". So if you deleted it can you please help me get it back up again or undelete it? --Daniel AR Pires (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

What the frick!

I got the wiggy iffy uh png on my page and you removed themm what the HECK! Why did you do that i am so upset because that is vandalism to my page. ggrrrrrrrrrrrr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmcinneny (talk • contribs) 23:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coin-operated binocular, Cape of Good Hope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Description could be expanded and the scope is abstract but still best in scope, useful and used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Africa Cafe, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Scores:

1. The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (01).jpg: +1) <--
2. The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (02).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope

=>

File: The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (01).jpg: Promoted <--
File: The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (02).jpg: Declined.

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

CA removal

Hi Moheen, do you have the RAW file for File:120-130, Chiappini Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg available? I guess, I could try to remove the CA from the JPG, but doing it in Raw is easier and insures better quality. You could upload the RAW file to https://commonsarchive.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page. Cheers. --MB-one (talk) 09:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiappini Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 73, Chiappini Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A wonderful image, may be a good FPC. But it could be better too. ISO 800 wasn't a good choice. It could be sharper too. --XRay 11:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bo-Kaap Heritage Mural by Nasser Palangi, 93 Wale Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pankaj Deo at Wikimania 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

মেটা-ডাটা না থাকলে করণীয়

Moheen ভাই, কিছু ছবিতে কোন মেটা-ডাটা থাকছে না, কোনটায় থাকলেও অ-সংলগ্ন কিছু লেখা থাকে। এসব ছবির ক্ষেত্রে করণীয় কি? যেমনঃ এখানে এখানে Mmrsafy (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Mmrsafy: আপাতত Images from WLM 2018 in Bangladesh missing exif metadata-এ যুক্ত করে রাখুন। ~MOHEEN ^{(keep talking)} 10:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiappini Street, Cape Town (NE-SW axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - A number of points of detail need to be repaired:

• The scope is not correct - Chiappini Street runs NE-SW which is almost exactly between N-S and E-W.
• The coordiniates given in the image map onto Church Street, not Chiappini Street.
• This image is used to illustrate Church Street in Wikidata and also Category:Church Street, Cape Town in Commons.
• The "Used in" label maps this page.

Martinvl (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Oppose" struck out after above problems remedied (See below). Martinvl (talk) 20:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

• ----

Scope changed from Chiappini Street, Cape Town (east-west axis) to Chiappini Street, Cape Town (NE-SW axis) --~MOHEEN ^{(keep talking)} 17:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wale Street, Cape Town, (NE-SW axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15-37 Pentz Street, Cape Town (north-south axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sri Sri Sita Temple (west exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful Ezarateesteban 17:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sri Sri Sita Temple (east-west exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and unique photo in that scope Ezarateesteban 17:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chauchala Chhota Govinda Mandir, eastern facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sri Sri Rama Lakshmana Kunda (south exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I can not understand what I see, it might be a sentence of explanation.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Info @Archaeodontosaurus: Please see the file description, hope it will be helpful. ~MOHEEN ^{(keep talking)} 05:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Support the precision in the caption seems to me very useful. do not forget that your images are seen all over the world.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beas Kund, south-east exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sree Sree Thakur Anukulchandra Satsang Gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gopal Temple, Puthia, western-front exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II Guard Pillbox, at the main entrance to Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, north exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

Hi Moheen, I reviewed all files from Hungama, except a few. ;oP I am a bit suspicious about the remaining ones: they have a different naming convention, there is no watermark, and there is no link to the page on Hungama, only to the image. There are also 2 small cropped PNG images of Sanjay Dutt. It would be much better to upload the original in JPEG, and upload the crops separately. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Leading models at Avon’s fashion show (60831785).jpg

And also:

• File:Leading models at Avon’s fashion show (60831786).jpg
• File:Leading models at Avon’s fashion show (60831789).jpg
• File:Leading models at Avon’s fashion show (60831790).jpg
• File:Leading models at Avon’s fashion show (60831791).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Aditi Rao Hydari at the launch of Shaheen Abbas’ collection for Gehna Jewellers (15).jpg

File:Aditi Rao Hydari at the launch of Shaheen Abbas’ collection for Gehna Jewellers (15).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Moheen/common.js

Hi Moheen, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Moheen/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 22 character 28: Duplicate key 'label'. - Evidence: 'label': 'Copyvio (www)',
2. ISSUE: line 23 character 26: Duplicate key 'tag'. - Evidence: 'tag': '{' + '{copyvio|1=[[COM:NETCOPYRIGHT|Copyright violation]], found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:{' + '{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}}} google search]}}',
3. ISSUE: line 24 character 34: Duplicate key 'img_summary'. - Evidence: 'img_summary': 'speedy deletion: possible copyvio',

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 19:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC).

APSRTC logo deleted why

APSRTC logo deleted Vamsikrish1331 (talk) 23:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Colors (224917).jpg

File:Colors (224917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roland zh (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

review my images

Can u review the below mentiones images plzz

• File:Rashmika at Filmfare-Awards-South-2018.jpg
• File:Nayantara at siima 2013.jpg
• File:Nani at South-Indian-International-Movie-Awards-.jpg
• File:Nayantara at SIIMA-in-Abu-Dhabi.jpg
• File:Sudheer Babu SIIMA-2016-finale-in-Singapore-12.jpg
• File:Sudheer Babu at SIIMA-Awards-2018-2.jpg
• File:Sai pallavi at Filmfare-Awards-South-2018.jpg
• File:Rashmika at South-Indian-International-Movie-Awards.jpg
• File:Sudheer at South-Indian-International-Movie-Awards-6.jpg

VenkateshMgna (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done @VenkateshMgna: but two of them are deleted per copyvio. You can only copy files from this category (www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/). ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank You responding so quickly VenkateshMgna (talk) 15:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo von Rock Antenne seit 2017.png

Hi Moheen, you have deleted this logo. It is quite simple and below treshold of originality. So your deletion was wrong. Can you at least make it possible to transfer the image to German Wikipedia? Chaddy (talk) 20:26, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Chaddy:  Done see Datei:Rockantenne Logo header-de (02).svg ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Chaddy (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@Chaddy: Undeleted. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Oh, thank you, too! Chaddy (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Matiur Rahman (military pilot).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Skimel (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Map of Mahajanapadas in Bengali.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I'll support it if you provide an english version of the map Ezarateesteban 23:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

 Info @Ezarate: I added the English version to the file page. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support good!! Ezarateesteban 23:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi, Please undelete the following files: File:Lech Jankowski, Czarny bez bez bzu, 2018.jpg, File:LJankowski-05.jpg, File:LJankowski-08.jpg. It is beed proper agreement sent to OTRS regarding them. ticket:2018101710007151, Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 21:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done @Polimerek: see the file page. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo512.png

There is an OTRS Ticket#2018092710005216 for this image. Seeing as you deleted it and are an OTRS agent, do you want to undelete and close the ticket, or shall I do it once you have undeleted it? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: There were no ticket number before deletion. Restored and marked the ticket number. Thanks. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 11:22, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Indeed but the image is probably COM:TOO to even require a ticket. Is this page the best place to ask you to undelete or do you use your OTRS talk page? Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Salaberry-de-Valleyfield

Hi, the logo has no copyright mentions, so please put it back. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yantremblayp (talk • contribs) 00:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

@Yantremblayp: Which file are you talking about? Link please? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Renan Larue.jpg

Hi, @Moheen: , I would like to ask you what motivated the speedy deletion of Renan Larue.jpg. The user who flagged the picture pointed it was already on a site, but that site did not claim rights for the picture to my knowledge, and the uploader said that he was the one who allowed the site to use the picture in the first place. Thanks. MonsieurD (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banana trees, Mahamaya Lake (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of Croatia Landesfarben.gif

Hi, please don't overwrite an image description page with a redirect. A page in File namespace can only be a redirect if there is no file with that name. Jcb (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: Do you think .gif is necessary where .svg is available? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

That may be or may not be the case, but if you decide to redirect the gif to the svg, please delete the gif file first. If you overwrite the file description page with a redirect without deleting the file, this will trigger several error reports. Jcb (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

OK. Thank you. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BNWIKI OAweek Edit-a-thon 2018 web banner.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Block, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! B-Section courtyard, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Remoção de bandeira

Boa tarde, voce removeu a bandeira da cidade de Antonio Carlos, ela foi retirada diretamente do site da cidade, onde esta disponivel para todos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulitharlis (talk • contribs) 15:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Bokomslag miniatyr 2018 framsida.jpg

Please restore this as we now have ticket#2018110410003079 for it. Can I use your OTRS user page for such requests or is here better? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor:  Done and marked with the ticket. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Moheen. You have new messages at Commons:Deletion requests/Creator:Revi. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You are yet to show me the proof the consensus that "Commons:Creator is a policy/guideline that all Commons user should follow". What is written in that page is, as I told you on that page, NOT a community guideline despite whatever is written down in the page. — regards, Revi 11:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Jannatul Ferdous Oishee.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jatiyo Smriti Soudho complex, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sri Sri Rama Lakshmana Kunda (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 15:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

New e-mail?

Hi there. We have received the following email from you. Why should the OTSR mail be submitted again? What's the matter with georg@gbcdesign.dk? It's the photographer's email. / Denmark Fed Cup team 2018.png

Best regards --Tennisbold (talk) 18:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Dear Georg Beyer Clausen,

We have received your statement regarding this file. Thank you for your submission! Unfortunately, we haven't been able to assess whether or not you are the individual with the authorization to release the copyright to it. All of our files must be accompanied by evidence that the original copyright holder is willing to release the copyright under acceptable terms, or else must somehow be in the public domain.

If the file has come from a particular website, a commonly accepted solution to this problem is for the uploader to show evidence of an email account directly associated with that website or with the site where the file was originally published. Here are some options for pursuing this:

1.) You can resend your email to us from an address listed on the contact page of your website (please ensure that you include our TICKET NUMBER somewhere in the subject line of your message so that our system will associate the new email with the current one); 2.) You can amend (temporarily or permanently) the contact page on your website so that this email address (the one you just sent us your last message from) appears on it, and reply to our email saying you have done so and giving us a link to the page. We will then verify this (usually within a day or two), and once we have added this verification to the ticket, we will update the file's copyright status; or 3.) (This is by far the easiest, quickest, and most certain option) Provided that you yourself are in fact the personal and sole copyright holder of ALL content available or hosted anywhere on your website (including all images, videos, text, and any sound files), you may add a notice on your website's home page stating something to the effect that "This website's content has been published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 license" (or a less restrictive Creative Commons license, if for some reason you prefer) and reply to this email saying you have done so and linking to where we can see the notice.

If there is no corresponding web page for the content, then we will require the original copyright holder to submit a statement releasing the copyright under acceptable terms. This may be done via our Interactive Release Generator, located here: <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates/Consent>. Doing this will require the copyright holder to create a free user account on Wikimedia Commons.

As a final approach, you may also perform copyright registration of the content at a registration agency and then attach the documentation as a PDF in an email to us. Make sure you include our ticket number in the subject line of your email.

Thank you for your understanding and patience! This procedure is in place to help ensure that Wikimedia respects copyrights and the rights of authors of original creative works. Please also understand that IF YOU ARE NOT THE ACTUAL SOLE COPYRIGHT HOLDER, or if you are unwilling to release the file under the terms of a free license such as CC-BY-SA 4.0 (which among other things permits commercial reuse of the file by anyone without notification or payment), or if the file is not in the public domain, then you may not upload the file to any Wikimedia project and we will have no choice but to delete the file if you do so. Repeatedly violating this policy will cause your account to become blocked, which we never like to do.

If you have further questions on any of this, please let me know and I will be glad to see if I can help you! We will be looking forward to your response.

Yours sincerely, Moheen Reeyad

November 2018

Hi, Moheen bro... How are u doing? Hope you'll be doing well. I think you have deleted any of my files, you did well but I need them so please if you could send them to me at: debateonislam@gmail.com

These files:

File:Fa tajali qoran dar asre elm.pdf

File:Hikmatyar's lessons.pdf

Thanks... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali.arab2018 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• @Ali.arab2018:  Done ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 11:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Azizul Hakim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Priti Chakraborty.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Puja Cherry Roy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Mumtaz Alia Akbari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope, great Protrait, meets all VI creteria. -- J. Lunau (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Change Image of Kartik Aaryan.

Hello Moheen, greetings for the day. my name is Paribesh Mansingh working for Kartik Aaryan as a manager. kindly change the current main wiki profile photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paribeshluffy (talk • contribs) 16:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Mohsen Namjoo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Translations

Hi Moheen. I see you speak bengali and chittagonian in more than other languages. Can you translate this kit in these languages ? At the beginning of the year, I adapt Wikidata Infobox to take in consideration these datas in Wikimedia Commons' categories. On an other hand, some of the functions are already able to work in different languages, as seen on d:Module:Cycling race. If a day one of this Wikipedia wants to use more widely datas from Wikidata about cycling, it is not complicated to adapt the module. Thanks, Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 10:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick:  Done. Listed labels are translated to bn. If you got any misinterpretation, please ping me. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 11:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it is perfect. Few items are not translated but they are not important, they are comparable as notes to explain a situation as a race shortened are a team melting with another. We have a little example of result here. The main complication comes from the fact bengali use another alphabet. If a day a Wikipedian wish write articles about cycling, we could prepare him a version of the module. I am interested if sometimes you have items from Bangladesh to translate in french (why not ?) with already a line in english. Thanks, Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 10:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Kangana Ranaut snapped at Taneira event (02).jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kangana Ranaut snapped at Taneira event (06).jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kiara Advani arrives at Isha Ambani – Anant Piramal’s pre-wedding Maha Aarti (06).jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Uploading images from Bollywood hungama

Hello, I came across the photos you uploaded from this website Bollywood Hungama. I tried to upload an image of Manushi Chhillar from the same website, and even sent an email to the copyright holders. I confused on what to do next. If it's not an inconvenience, can you please upload any of these photos - [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Your help is highly appreciated. Thank you. Hogwarts Portal (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hogwarts Portal:  Done But not all of them, because those are not so useful IMO; although several images are available in this category. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Chiba TV logo.jpg

Hi, your speedy deletion is incorrect since there is no unambiguous copyright infringement. Please, read COM:TOO#Japan, template:PD-textlogo and template:trademark. If you believe File:Chiba TV logo.jpg surpasses the threshold of originality, you can start a regular deletion request.--Sakretsu (talk) 15:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)