User talk:Livioandronico2013/Archive/2015

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA of Pope Clement XI on Obelisk of Pantheon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisk of the Foro Italico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of S.Peter in night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trees and Ice on Lake of Bracciano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice motive, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:47, 01 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sp 4a Near Trevignano Romano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Bernardino from Siena in Trevignano Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Bernardino da Siena in Trevignano Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper, but still okay. --Steindy 10:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Bernardino in Trevignano Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of San Bernardino in Trevignano Romano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --ArildV 12:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Eurysaces the Baker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For some the blown sky would be auto decline, but the main subject is very well shown and the sky does not distract. It's good enough for me. --Ram-Man 23:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Lake of Bracciano 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Code 12:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Lake of Bracciano3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --Dnalor 01 20:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree in the lake of Nemi2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Nemi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too much sky.--XRay 09:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 13:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Steindy 21:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Aphrodite in the Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too dark, a better crop would be useful and it looks like a barral at the bottom. May be it's fixable.--XRay 09:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Done --Livioandronico2013 21:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Weak  Support. It is a bright light at the right, this is a little bit disturbing.--XRay 06:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

White balance

Hi, Tried to correct the white balance of 4 of your images. I think there are quite interesting. I specially like the painting in trompe-l'oeil, and the sarcophagus. However, my corrections are certainly far from perfect. You could do better if you have the RAW files. Hope you don't mind. Best regards, Yann (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

• File:Painted door with a Benedictine monk and cat.JPG
• File:Cover Roman sarcophagus child.jpg
• File:Roman statue.jpg
• File:Roman sphinx.jpg

Merci Yann, today was a bad day at work and I had not had time. --LivioAndronico talk 20:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Aphrodite in Baths of Diocletian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Mercury in Baths of Diocletian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ox head in Baths of Diocletian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ox head in Baths of Diocletian (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemi view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Marcus Aurelius in the Baths of Diocletian (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark, but still ok. Please, choose more detailed categories. --Poco a poco 23:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of CaracallaMuseo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 22:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Group of Mars and Venus in the Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little bit noisy, but overall good quality. --Code 22:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fresco with CoA of Pope Pius VII.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fresco with CoA of Pope Pius VII.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busts of Tiberius at Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It's not perfectly sharp at 100% and a little bit noisy, but considering the size of 24 megapixels I think it meets all in all the QI criteria. --Code 21:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman sarcophagi in the Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:57, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman sphinx in the Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is ok but is it possible to have an accurate description on the file page, for the place for exemple, please? --Christian Ferrer 05:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 12:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Blueish. Yann 14:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)  Done --Livioandronico2013 21:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Christian Ferrer can you check? thanks --Livioandronico2013 08:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Yes, the description is always the same : Roman sphinx, please write where you took it. And for the white balance I'm a little confused, the latest version is very different, you took the photo, what do you think? more realistic? --Christian Ferrer 17:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Christian,thanks --Livioandronico2013 16:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Support WB is ok for me, you did not understand what I wanted for the file description so I did it myself --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedestal in Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Probably something deeper f 7.1.--Famberhorst 08:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Stop your personal attacks!

There is no reason to comment on reviews of your images in the course of the QI process on a personal level.

To submit to me that I have personal problems and even qualify my comments as stupid, is a massive personal attack. This will not be tolerated here, nor I will not tolerate that at all.

If colleagues remove such comments from you, this can be described as the very polite way to resolve conflicts. If you then repeat the same in a row, this is a extremely deliberate act to continue these personal attacks.

I do not want you to have problems because of that and ask you to refrain any comments of this kind in the future.--Hubertl (talk) 10:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You Hubertl still did not understand what a personal attack, it means contact the person!

Your opinions are often stupid and meaningless, opinions and not you, it's not a personal attack, you know? This is a personal attack [1] "This looks more like a childish revenge action. This is not a kindergarten.Please other opinions. --Hubertl 21:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) " While this is a personal attack? Do you understand? Can you understand? I hope so.--LivioAndronico talk 13:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

I can and will not argue something, which is common sense. What you have written - an this repetitive, even after someone has removed these attacks - is a personal attack, an intentionally insult, which is absolutely unacceptable. Especially when you expanded your attacks even to this person, who deleted those attacks. If you are not able to accept criticism as a personal opportunity for learning, then you have to find a different platform. Flickr, Instagram... you name it.

I don´t want to talk about this any longer, but I want you to remove everyt Insult you have written at the QI-candidate list, what I have already mentioned above and even your personel insult to Steindy. I would consider, that it will be appropriate if you do this with an explicite expression of regret. Which I regard as a matter of course between civil people. Working together in this project means more than just using it as a platform of competition, because it is not a competition at all. It is already evident that right now most of the collegues are tired to deal with your new nominations.

Nobody can act with someone inbetween the same working area, when things are going like this. And you also know, that I am not the only person, you have problems with. Excessive ambition is a poor base for this project. You demonstrate this behavior almost every time, when someone gives you a unfavorable but honest judgement, even when it is just a friendly advice for correcting some faults.

Be patient, especially for yourself, be more self-critical with your images, be aware, that you are the person with the most withdrawings, at QI in the same way as in FP. That should make you thoughtfully. Be thankful that to work for those wonderful people, which in some cases have for decades of experience more with photography, art, public relation and design than you have. Take it as an opportunity to learn something.

I ask you urgently to take my writings very seriously. --Hubertl (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hubertl :I have no time, unlike you since you're here all day, I don't want to answer all these nonsense you wrote, of course you have not mentioned your insults for a picture that was then naturally declined. Abstain you do a better figure.--LivioAndronico talk 09:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Restes du banquet, mosaïque.jpg

Hi, I am very surprised that we didn't have a single picture of this famous mosaic. Could you please check if the location is correct (it took me a long time to find [2]). And may be you could go there and take more of it? Best regards, Yann (talk) 16:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

And I am very surprised that you ask me that even after you don't answered me after I wrote to you.However I can go there the 25 January which is free. Greetings.--LivioAndronico talk 17:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I overlooked your message. Did you see Category:Photographs by Carole Raddato? Best regards, Yann (talk) 18:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok Yann I'm gone but the area where the mosaic is closed to the public, I had to move more than a little but in the end I had allowed to do some quick photo. Soon the load, you're free to change but you beforehand that not having had much time I did what I could, greetings. --LivioAndronico talk 20:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok Yann the pictures are on line,i don't touch nothing. If you want you can work these. Sorry for the quality but i repeat that i do it quickly. Regards.--LivioAndronico talk 22:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the Domus Augustana on Palatine Hill and museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the Domus Augustana on Palatine Hill..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Monument to the Bersagliere - Battle of the Bridge Goito.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to the Bersagliere - Battle of the Bridge Goito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well Cloister in Museo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think the description is insufficient. The picture does not really show the cloister but this whatever-thing which seems to be located in the center of the cloister. --Code 22:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Done Code,thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 11:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC) @Livioandronico2013: I think we didn't understand each other. I wanted you to write in the description (not the filename) what this thing on the photo is. Is it a fountain? The technical quality of the image is good, I will promote it as soon as you say what we see on the photo. --Code 21:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Code lo scrivo in italiano che forse è meglio "Well" in inglese significa "Pozzo" Dunque "Well Cloister " significa "Pozzo del chiostro" che è esattamente quello proposto nella foto--Livioandronico2013 22:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Let's say it's a good "village pump", so far not mentioned on pages about the museum, two churches, and what else in various languages. –Be..anyone 02:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC) @Livioandronico2013: Thank you, now I understand. @Be..anyone: I thought it was good practice here to let the promotion be done by the first reviewer in such cases. --Code 06:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of young CaracallaMuseo delle Terme di Diocleziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Sorry, not really sharp (have a look at the sign, seems if it was a camera shake). --Code 22:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Code what you think now? Io penso meglio...vedi tu --Livioandronico2013 20:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Meglio cosí. Within acceptable range, I think. --Code 20:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Lucius Verus portrayed as a arval brother.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 01:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Antoninus Pius portrayed as a arval brother.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --C messier 14:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Giuseppe Mazzini - The trionfal revolution.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very borderline exposure, but the details are there and it's certainly a photo an end user could fix. --Ram-Man 03:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramica of Rome view from Via San Lucio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments kay now. --Steindy 22:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Porta Pia - Statue of Saint Alexander.jpg

Hi, I tried to correct the bluish colors. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Merci Yann,très poli --LivioAndronico talk 14:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Silvio Spaventa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add the next time the correct category and position. This monument is not at the piazza del repubblica. Also an accurate description. I did it for now. --Hubertl 23:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC) ok thanks --Livioandronico2013 23:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration of the Building in Republic Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration of the building in Republic Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Republic Square in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures of Roman theater masks in Baths of Diocletian3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concattedrale di San Giovenale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ornaro Alta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concattedrale di San Giovenale (Narni).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse head in Baths of Diocletian (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocca Albornoz (Narni).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Rocca Albornoz (Narni).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cappella della Madonna Del Rosario in St. Mary above Minerva.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cappella della Madonna Del Rosario in St. Mary above Minerva.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Saint Paul in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonnade and sky of Saint Paul (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Luke the Evangelist in Saint Paul (Rome) - Cloister.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue and Colonnade of Saint Paul in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 16:51, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonnade of the Cloister in Saint Paul (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though it would be better to center the image. Can you manage that? --Dnalor 01 09:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)  Done thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 21:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remain of Roman column in the Basailica di San Paolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, sharpness could be a little better. --Code 18:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Foto su QUI

Ok, grazie per i consigli :-) --Yiyi (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Secondo te una di queste due può ambire al riconoscimento di qualità? File:Beata Vergine del Rosario (Pompei) 04.JPG e File:Beata Vergine del Rosario (Pompei) 08.JPG. --Yiyi (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

CiaoDario,la prima probabilmente si ( ma qui c'è gente strana che potrebbe declinarla anche solo perchè ci sono troppe foglie per esempio!) comunque entrambe hanno bisogno di un'aggiusta alla prospettiva,la prima meno, mentre la seconda è da lavorarci! Molti hanno foto in QI che secondo me hanno distorto peggio del normale ma spesso sono amici di amici e se le promuovono. A parte tutto devi lavorare un pò sulla prospettiva che comunque in QI è molto richiesta,ciao. --LivioAndronico talk 20:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of Sutri in the town square.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unidentified saint in the cathedral of Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Leonard da Vinci

Hi, I have renominated it: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leonardo da Vinci - Virgin and Child with St Anne C2RMF retouched.jpg/2. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok Yann,anyway I have nominated this [3],salu --LivioAndronico talk 20:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Camera quality

I wish you wouldn't keep complaining about your poor quality camera gear. The D3200 is a fantastic camera that is capable of taking just as good a photograph as my camera (see DXO Mark) and is better than the camera I used to own that got me loads of featured pictures (see DXO Mark). My current camera might be more expensive but that only affects things like build quality or focus cleverness, and makes little difference to shooting scenery. Jebulon owns a basic old 14MP camera and still creates dozens of feature pictures with his. What might be a problem is if you are using the kit lens, which is often the weaker part of a camera. Buying a prime such as 35mm is a good cheap step to higher quality photos, and the fast aperture opens up more possibilities. It is also possible to create stitched panorama photos without any fancy tripod or panorama head, as long as it is outdoors. Look at my user page for proof -- nearly all my panorama photos were taken hand-held with the Sony A33. My A33 was a "entry-level camera" just like your D3200, only yours is more modern technology. Another reason for lack of sharpness is simply technique -- either how your a holding the camera or your choice of shutter speed, aperture and iso. If you are taking longer-exposure shots on a tripod, use a remote control to fire the shutter (or the 2-second timer) -- remote controls are often available cheaply on ebay. My latest photo (File:Tower Bridge view at dawn.jpg) was taken using a cheap plastic lens that cost me £75 and could have been shot hand-held as there are no parallax problems with such views. There are plenty people with expensive £3000 full-frame cameras and £2000 professional lenses who take weak photographs. It is the grey lump between your ears, not the black lump in your hands that makes the difference. -- Colin (talk) 17:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok thanks --LivioAndronico talk 20:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration in the Cathedral of Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration with the four evangelists in the Cathedral of Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of the Cathedral of Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Spurzem 22:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Silvestro (Sutri).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of Sutri on the fountain in the town square.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of Cattedrale in Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Etruriae Castrua in Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of Church of San Silvestro (Sutri).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good, but a little bit dark. --XRay 09:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)  DoneXRay just ask,thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 11:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of Urban VIII in Sutri.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion of medieval fountain in Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe organ of the cathedral in Sutri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inside the Cathedral of Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- KTC 22:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolphin fountain in the town square.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sharpness OK, but I would crop out the right window. The house is disturbing.--XRay 09:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Done XRay,better? --Livioandronico2013 21:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment I've done something I myself do not like: I uploaded a new image instead yours. With some modifications. It's just a proposal, please restore your iamge if you like. If my modifications are OK for you, let me know. --XRay 08:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC) For me is ok XRay --Livioandronico2013 20:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 06:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lateral left chapel of the Cathedral of Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good I think.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco of the Cathedral of Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of Church of San Francesco in Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well in Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, assumin the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 20:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella Farrattini in the Cathedral of Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 01:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiev of Cathedral of Sutri.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too dark and too much sky. I would crop out the half window and half cross on the left. Sorry, I've seen your file name, do you mean "view"? Should I rename your file?--XRay 09:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Done XRay,better? --Livioandronico2013 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment Brightness is OK, but the crop isn't good. I've made a propose.--XRay 08:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Right side is leaning in BTW. Mattbuck 14:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC) For me is ok XRay --Livioandronico2013 20:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sorry. Please have a look to the note (crop) at your image.--XRay 06:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)  Done XRay,thanks --Livioandronico2013 21:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 08:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiev of towerbell of Cathedral of Sutri.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too dark and too much sky. --XRay 09:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Done XRay,better? --Livioandronico2013 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment Brightness is OK, but the crop isn't good. I've made a propose.--XRay 08:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC) For me is ok XRay --Livioandronico2013 20:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sorry. Please have a look to the note (crop) at your image.--XRay 06:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)  Done XRay,thanks --Livioandronico2013 21:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 08:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window of St. Agostin in Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of St. Francis in Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of St. Francis in Amelia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Colonnade and sky of Saint Paul (Rome).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Colonnade and sky of Saint Paul (Rome).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe Organ of St. Francis in Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Sebastian outside the walls - Interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Respect! Great work!!! --Hubertl 20:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC) Danke Hubertl,make me very like --Livioandronico2013 21:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC) You're welcome.--Hubertl 21:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Fabiano con angeli in Cappella Albani in San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Sebastian outside the walls - Intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus of Gian Lorenzo Bernini in San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, my favourite statuary of baroque :-) --Isiwal 23:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe organ in St. Francis in Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The picture has a blue cast and is overall too dark. Can you fix these issues? --Code 07:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)  Done Code thanks --Livioandronico2013 20:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Ok. ---Code 23:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus Christ of Gian Lorenzo Bernini in San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. This one is even better then the other one! --Hubertl 23:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues behind the Altar of St. Cathedral of Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of Cathedral of Terni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of St. Cathedral of Amelia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. even when its a bit dark it´s ok for me --Hubertl 14:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)  Done more brightness thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 16:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of St. Peter and statues at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and QI -- Spurzem 16:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella Albani in San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roof of San Sebastiano fuori le mura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Jesus Christ by Gianlorenzo Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roof of San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arch and altar of San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of San Sebastiano fuori le mura (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Isiwal 09:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Saint Sebastian outside the walls - Interno.jpg

Hi Livioandronico, here is a try I made on your image (crop, sharp, contrast, colors). As it is in the file history you can revert on it if you like. -- Christian Ferrer 22:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Giovanni Maria Gabrielli in San Sebastian outside the walls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --Isiwal 21:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: repeated mass violations of COM:Categories, COM:OVERCAT despite several discussions + requests. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Sorry, you seem to have learned NOTHING since your very first edit on Commons. Your recent uploads are as poorly categorized as they always were. Please read the guidelines before uploading anything (let alone nominating on QI/FP). --A.Savin 13:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

SORRY you can save it A.Savin as I think it does not expect more. Stuck without even a warning, thanks. Very democratic.--LivioAndronico talk 14:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Hi, I have not been notified nor booked for these reasons and then I never read that someone was stuck for too much or too little use of categories. Also with the User A.Savin I had various problems and this seems to me a vengeance (is possible read here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_47#A.Savin), thanks.--LivioAndronico talk 19:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)" Decline reason: "In Commons (as outside of Commons), everybody should be nice towards others. But you are flaming hate here. This is unconstructive. As this discussion shows, 3 days block is even too short. Please consider taking wikibreak or even retiring from Commons, if you feel, that you cannot cooperate with A. Savin, Mattbuck and others. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Thanks for your answer Taivo but I do not hate anyone, but I am appalled by the behavior of savin that blocked me without even warning me, I would ask you kindly to see the whole story and not just what you see here. Tell to Matt that I was wrong to ask to him is not hatred ,in my opinion,and still have many friends here if I asked around. I think that you'd be nervous if I were locked by an administrator without notice and they already called you undertaker, thanks. --LivioAndronico talk 13:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

I've had several problems with this user about categorization and indeed, it seems he avoids good practices as per our rules, despite many warnings. However, I personaly thing that such a sudden and abrupt block is maybe a bit harsh... I ask for indulgence...--Jebulon (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

It's always so easy to blame all on personal revenge, but can you please state why are you violating the categorization rules despite your long-term experience on Commons? @Livioandronico2013: ? --A.Savin 12:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A.Savin violating what? put too much or too little? block for this reason not even tell ??? is vengeance and you know it!--LivioAndronico talk 12:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for this very insightful reply. --A.Savin 13:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

wellcome --LivioAndronico talk 13:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Livioandronico2013, I have not looked into your situation, but editing while logged out to ask people about it is block evasion. I have blocked your IP for 3 days. If in future you wish to contact someone while blocked, use the email link - all admins should have this enabled - or talk to us on IRC. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

MattbuckThank you, instead of controlling the situation absurd you have blocked my ip and you've cheated! Excellent administrator would say ... you could also give me wrong but at least check sir. However, I had suggested to talk to you, I was hesitant, but now I'm sure it was a bad idea.--LivioAndronico talk 19:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Livioandronico2013 I don't always have the amount of time an investigation takes, but certain things, such as block evasion, are clearly problematic. I have now looked into this, and I can see a single instance of warning about categorisation, and it was not relating to an OVERCAT issue. A.Savin, could you please show me where these discussions relating to Livioandronico's behaviour are? There's certainly nothing recent on the talk page or the 2015 archive. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

mattbuck I "escaped" the block because I did not see the link to your email anywhere unlike other administrators. Also that the discussion (very quiet without any warning of possible blocks) was with another user which moreover expressed contrary to my block--LivioAndronico talk 23:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

On QIC, they were several time requested to categorize carefully (including recently by Jebulon etc.), but I don't mind the QIC/FP pages anymore. With their undiscerning behaviour, Livioandronico2013 damages not only the FP/QI project, but Commons as a whole. Should I see violations of COM:Categories next time, I'll block them for 1 week; then for 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months; 1 year; indef. --A.Savin 00:22, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

For all who interested, there is also this discussion: Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#Standard's slipping again & double standards, on their FPC nomination, as anyone who has/had experience in evaluating images can see that 1) the nomination is not eligible for FP due to its poor quality, and it's obviously not the first time by Livioandronico2014; 2) there are kind of meatpuppet supports, which makes it all simply disgusting. The only purpose of this user on Commons is to upload as much average shots as possible and to make as much of them as possible to QI/FP. There is no interest to submit stuff that is really being needed. That is also the reason why categories and other policies are being ignored. Apparently, it is possible to make a picture QI without proper categorization, you must just mobilize the right people. That is not the Commons I'd like to work on. --A.Savin 00:33, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

A.Savin Is classic of insecure people having arguments that are not involved in the discussions to validate their choices, however, we face the whole. Jebulon himself has written that you have exaggerated and you call it in your favor, then that means ect? Specification thanks. Your opinions are personal and are only those that disgust and especially the way you do. The images that load on FP are all QI so if you say you are low quality you say so, then it does not have the standard FP can be, but that means that no one can charge nominations on FP otherwise have trouble? I've blocked without even a warning and for a stupid reason! You are vindictive and many people can not stand you here if you do not know. As an administrator you really are lacking.--LivioAndronico talk 07:40, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

You with your way acid and dictatorial to damage the project!--LivioAndronico talk 07:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Please read at least COM:OVERCAT and follow it after your block expires. If an image is in category "Busts of Hadrianus in the Palazzo Massimo alle Terme" it should not be additionally in "Palazzo Massimo alle Terme", "Museo Nazionale Romano", "Hadrian", and "Busts of Hadrianus". In case you continue your demonstrative violation of Commons rules, I'll block you for 1 week next time; then for 2 weeks; 1 month; 3 months; 6 months; 1 year; indef. --A.Savin 11:00, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

But A.Savin instead of blocking why not simply say, "Livio the photos you've categorized not follow the rules etc .. I will have to proceed to the next to a block"! It 'so complicated? I do not believe. If you had done probably would have apologized and I would have done without help achieve this.--LivioAndronico talk 13:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Several requests by fellow QIC colleagues were obviously useless. Sooner or later it had to come so far. --A.Savin 17:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok A.Savin , can you show me these requests?--LivioAndronico talk 17:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

This? I personaly thing that such a sudden and abrupt block is maybe a bit harsh... I ask for indulgence..--LivioAndronico talk 17:22, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

[4] probably the latest one, at times I was active on QIC I remember there were several problems regarding your categorization, your nominations, your intolerance to colleagues who shown criticism on your behaviour. See also [5]. For me there is simply nothing to discuss anymore. --A.Savin 17:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Jebulon wrote that you have exaggerated and feel Hubertl, ask him to confirm the matter ..... --LivioAndronico talk 17:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry no, I did not wrote this. I just asked for indulgence. Please don't try to involve me in your problem. My advice: stay away by yourself from Commons from a few days, have a promenade along the Tiber, breathe deeply, take pictures, and learn about categorization. Best regards.--Jebulon (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

You wrote this or not? I personaly thing that such a sudden and abrupt block is maybe a bit harsh.. --LivioAndronico talk 17:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

I haven't exaggerated anything, because I am acting for the sake of Wikimedia Commons, and you with your behaviour are damaging Wikimedia Commons. Of course you're also uploading pictures, but all in all you damage more than you add value. --A.Savin 17:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

For me the problem are you with your despotic ways ,your opinion as mine --LivioAndronico talk 17:58, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, you know all the ways to complain. --A.Savin 18:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Sure --LivioAndronico talk 18:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

(Why is this talkpage on my watchlist?) If someone (especially someone experienced) say that you are doing something wrong you should be happy that someone cares about stuff - so you know what you are doing wrong. I suggest you take a wikibreak until this block expiry (drinking a tea, taking new photos, ... - it is generally not allowed to use a talk page for drama during block) and then come back with a lot of COM:AGF and COM:MELLOWness. my two cents... --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Intern of Church of San Francesco in Amelia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Intern of Church of San Francesco in Amelia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Discobolus in National Roman Museum Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Discobolus in National Roman Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Epicurus in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Boxer of Quirinal (Mys from Taranto).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boxer of Quirinal (Mys from Taranto) - Lateral View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Faustina Minor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough--Jebulon 11:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of Church of St. Alphonsus Liguori, Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Strategos in Palazzo Massimo (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments you should put the two red borders vertically straight and symmetrical --Christian Ferrer 09:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC) Ops  Done Christian Thanks --Livioandronico2013 09:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 13:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Philip V of Macedon in Palazzo Massimo (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 15:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Boxer of Quirinal (Mys from Taranto) - Lateral view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Commodus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Isiwal 23:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of boxer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, maybe perspective of background could be better a bit... --Isiwal 23:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of old woman in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could you lighten up this bust series a bit? It would be better! --Hubertl 09:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Hubertl,thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 10:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of manly man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Personally, I would opt for f11, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Antoninus Pius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 20:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Publius Aelius Traianus Hadrianus in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit dark, but good.--Jebulon 20:26, 9 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Jebulon,better? Merci --Livioandronico2013 20:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Sabina (Rome) - Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Even when the apsis is a bit dark, though its QI for me. --Hubertl 12:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Catherine of Siena in Santa Sabina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seleucid prince (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Famberhorst 16:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of girl in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Girl in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Bearded man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of bearded man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seleucid prince (Rome) in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity the face which is dark, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 18:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Hypnos in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Heracles in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Herodotus in Palazzo Massimo (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boxer of Quirinal (Mys from Taranto).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, please reduce noise in the back --Isiwal 10:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)  Done,thanks --Livioandronico2013 11:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Silenus in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Silenus in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Socrates in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 20:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Caracalla in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, maybe a little to dark. --Hubertl 17:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 20:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme PMT 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 17:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Discobolus in National Roman Museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Diphilos in Palazzo Massimo (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Symbol and statues in St. Peter.jpg

Hi, Your image is not too bad, but requesting friends to vote for you is really not OK. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Yann but I have only asked to give a look, I never said phrases like, "I hope you will support me" or "please vote". If you think you have the wrong'm glad that people who know me judge me without insulting me or my work as others do. If I have a negative opinion, without being told terrible, what painful etc., but right with right advice I am the first to be so happy because I can improve.I do not seek votes, I just try to improve. I'm not offended if an image does not pass, offend me if I get insulted for free--LivioAndronico talk 13:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Vespasianus in Palazzo Massimo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Vespasianus in Palazzo Massimo (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Floor mosaic with the face of dionisio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Domitianus in Palazzo Massimo (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Church of St. Alphonsus Liguori, Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Lucius Verus in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 21:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Sorry, not yet: categories not precise enough. You must do better before promotion. Look in the sub-categories of the museum.--Jebulon 21:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC) The heads are in the category of "busts" too? --Livioandronico2013 22:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Anyway  Done --Livioandronico2013 22:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Support Yes, I agree that "heads" are not really "busts", but it looks so here. Anyway the categorization is better now. Your collection of ancient roman heads is very precious for "Commons". I find it really fascinating. I love these portraits.--Jebulon 22:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Thanks,i'm glad --Livioandronico2013 22:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Antoninus Pius in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments not that sharp, a bit noisy and too dark. Improvable. And look at the category "Antoninus Pius", for sure you will find a more accurate sub-category, hmmm ? --Jebulon 21:44, 16 March 2015 (UTC)  Done The subcategory "busts" but it is a head ... I do not know if it's okay--Livioandronico2013 21:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC) SupportBetter now. The crop is a bit tight above, but it is QI for me.--Jebulon 22:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of bearded man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background a bit distracting, nevertheless QI. Maybe the dark parts could be lightened a bit --Moroder 19:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of priest of Isis in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Sabina (Rome) - Apse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Isiwal 20:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Marcus Cocceius Nerva (?) in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, even when weak, --Hubertl 23:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Antinous in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi. weak decicion because of a too tight crop --Hubertl 23:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Female head in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Gaius Iulius Caesar (?) in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be denoised a bit. Anyway, the quality is good. --Hockei 18:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman statue of young African acrobat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But look at the mouth! And don´t believe italian curators. They are mostly underpaid, in this case probably overpaid.--Hubertl 13:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of Marcus Cocceius Nerva in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contrast could be a little bit higher, but image complies with QI standard though. --Cccefalon 06:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 08:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of woman in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 18:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Roma).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient mosaic floor in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niobide wound in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme - particularly of the face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niobide wound in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of old manPalazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudo-Seneca in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of woman (Saffo?) in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of man in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 06:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of woman Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 06:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Visit Brazil someday!

Hello, LivioAndronico! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk),when I'll have the money sure,here are worse of greece --LivioAndronico talk 20:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decoration and mosaic above the door of Sant'Alfonso de Liguori (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodite of Menophantos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. It´s a difficult place without tripod permission --Hubertl 10:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boxer of Quirinal (Mys from Taranto) - Detail of the feet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherub of the Fountain city park of terni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remains of the Roman amphitheater of Terni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 14:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Bernardo alle Terme - ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:05, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of the Church of St. Valentine in Terni with the saint's tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Heracles in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of the church in Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paint on the arch in Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues of griffin in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Roma).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Discobolus in National Roman Museum Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Discobolus in National Roman Museum Palazzo Massimo alle Terme.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It´s a pity, just a concrete pour --Hubertl 11:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Maria Nova in Toffia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symbol of Abbey farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. Categorization could be better though.--Jebulon 09:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Livioandronico2013 09:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms of cardinal Giambattista Orsini in Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Would be better if you add sharpness. --Halavar 19:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Livioandronico2013 22:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 21:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Church of St. Alphonsus Liguori, Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Velino in Terni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I recommend you to add some sharpness. --Halavar 15:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Hal thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 20:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 10:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Catherine of Siena in Santa Sabina 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 00:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Catherine of Siena in Santa Sabina 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Jesus out of Church of St. Alphonsus Liguori, Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main object sharp, OK for QI --Isiwal 08:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santi Bonifacio e Alessio (Rome) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of Santi Bonifacio e Alessio (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abside of Sant'Anselmo all'Aventino (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Well of Santi Bonifacio e Alessio all'aventino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eleonora Buoncompagni's tomb in Santi Bonifacio e Alessio all'aventino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Sabina (Rome) - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment @Livioandronico2013: You should buy yourself a new lens, the right side is very blurry which seems to appear often in your photos. But if the quality is good for Hubertl, I won't oppose. --Code 06:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues on Portale delle Arti (Perugia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval lion of the museum of Perugia - Left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval lion of the museum of Perugia - Right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 14:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Catherine of Siena in Santa Sabina - Paint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok and QI for me. --Hubertl 21:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quattro Fontane - Statue Diana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quattro Fontane - The River Tiber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of Church Sant' Anselmo all'Aventino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of griffin on post office in Perugia - Right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval gate in Terni Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, third opinion appreciated --Hubertl 08:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA of Pope Clemens VIII on the Church of the Society of 'prayer and the Good Death in Perugia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpito of the cathedral of San Lorenzo in Perugia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corinthian column with Griffin in Perugia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shield with griffin in Perugia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quattro Fontane - The River Arno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Stanislaus Kostka in Sant'Andrea al quirinale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Constitutional Court of Italy - Principal door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Equestrian statue of Carlo Alberto (Rome) - Lateral view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit on the dark side, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Mascherone di Santa Sabina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Mascherone di Santa Sabina (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

contraluz = retroilluminazione ?

Quizás ya lo sepas, pero...

En fotos como esta (File:Coat of arms of Pius IX in Quirinale.jpg), realizada en contraluz (con la luz por detrás), deberías probar a usar un flash.

Usar un flash es difícil y suele empeorar las fotos, pero en las fotos realizadas contraluz es muy efectivo, y es fácil usarlo.

Un abrazo--Lmbuga (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Gracias Lmbuga, pero ya era demasiado lejos y sólo tengo el flash de la camera que no es la mejor, sin embargo, gracias :) --LivioAndronico talk 17:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Aunque te parezca poca cosa ese flash, úsalo. Puede sorprenderte si la distancia no es superior a 10 o 15m.--Lmbuga (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Tienes razón: Era lejísimo. Ni un flash de 500€ puede hacer nada--Lmbuga (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

De todas las maneras, no olvides probar con el flash, puede haber resultados diferentes--Lmbuga (talk) 18:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Claro amigo, gracias --LivioAndronico talk 18:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Quirinale (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, good--Lmbuga 10:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms of Clemens XII on Constitutional Court of Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coats of arms of the House of Savoy on Constitutional Court of Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Quirinale (Roma) - Statue of Dioscuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana del Quirinale (Rome) - Statue of Dioscuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorations of Abbey Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome!

Thanks for your appreciation for the image of Ian Curtis's gravestone. I, too, had been surprised even before I went to Macclesfield last year before Wikimania that no one had bothered to take a picture of the new marker. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I love these photos useful, where no one has done before --LivioAndronico talk 06:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Dioscuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance of Constitutional Court of Italy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, ot perfectly sharp, but ok. --Hubertl 11:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Discobolus in National Roman Museum Palazzo Massimo alle Terme - Detail of the back.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp and minimalist where it needs to be --Daniel Case 05:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Altar of Santi Bonifacio e Alessio (Rome).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altar of Santi Bonifacio e Alessio (Rome).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bell of the Duomo of Perugia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but chromatic aberrations, if you want I can fix them--Lmbuga 21:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Better Lmbuga? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 21:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Yes, Good --Lmbuga 22:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upper side of entrance on Palazzo del Capitano del Popolo (Perugia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of Justitia on Palazzo del Capitano del Popolo (Perugia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Pius IX in Quirinale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale obelisk - Tip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cup bronze with nymphs of the Fontana Maggiore in Perugia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quattro Fontane - Juno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult position, but OK for me. --Hubertl 11:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA in Francavilla Fontana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refelies of the fountain in Francavilla Fontana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief on Palazzo Giannuzzi-Carissimo (Francavilla Fontana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 15:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of ionic column at the Museum of Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment This is not a Doric capital but a combination of ionic (volute) and corinthiac (leaves) capitals. And please take one more look at the brightest parts (they look cyan). --C messier 17:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC) No,infact is Ionic...anyway I don't see cyan --Livioandronico2013 17:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC) OK with description, but see note. --C messier 17:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC) I don't see note --Livioandronico2013 18:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC) Check again (it's in the middle of the photo). --C messier 18:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)  Done C messier,thanks and Σε Χαιρετω --Livioandronico2013 19:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)  Support OK for me, although you must mention it is a B&W image. --C messier 20:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metopa of funerary monument with solders in soft stone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of San Sebastiano (Francavilla Fontana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is still a lot of CA. I think, that a square crop without the modern buildings might become to the image (see note). --Cccefalon 15:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)  Done Cccefalon,thanks --Livioandronico2013 18:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Much better!!! please see my note. A shame that the sky was so grey at that day but that's not your fault. --Cccefalon 07:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spanish Plate in The Chapel St. leonard in Castello Aragonese (Taranto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello Aragonese (Taranto) 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic of Pantera with Goat in Museo archeologico nazionale (Taranto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Considering the difficulty of the shot, I think this is okay. The noise is a little high, but not much of a choice in a museum. --Crisco 1492 10:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella of the Duomo (Spoleto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trulli in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Girevole (Taranto) 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candelabra of Spoleto Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice symmetrry and form; good detail --Daniel Case 05:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Very good idea!

Muy buena idea: Commons talk:Quality images candidates#Resolution in QI. Es agradable que los compañeros de viaje piensen en el camino que debemos hacer.--Lmbuga (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Gracias, y esto es sólo el comienzo amigo. Necesitamos actualizar muchas cosas. --LivioAndronico talk 20:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Internal of St. George the Martyr in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tip of Trullo in Alberobello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could be cropped somewhat for composition reasons, but ok as is. --Smial 10:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Church of St. george in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trullo with sign in Alberobello2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorations of Abbazia di Farfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 10:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of St. Paul on church of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window on Madonna della Greca in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok, there is still potential to improve highlights --Poco a poco 09:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Madonna della Greca in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Girevole at Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpit of the church of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 13:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of the church of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello aragonese in taranto seen from Ponte Girevole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of Chapel St. Leonardo in Castello Aragonese in Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good picture, but Unbalanced composition (too much space at right) and perhaps a bit yellow (I'm not sure: Only you can judge this IMO)--Lmbuga 09:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)  DoneLmbuga ,thanks --Livioandronico2013 19:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Ehm...Lmbuga,r u there? --Livioandronico2013 19:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 13:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Borde superior

En el borde superior de File:Left face on the town hall in Nepi.jpg hay "Cyan CAs". Me parece una buena imagen y QI sin CAs--Lmbuga (talk) 14:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Audi A5

Hallo LivioAndronico, would you kindly look to File:Audi A5 TDI, Bj. 2011 (2013-05-04 9590).JPG once more. I don't know the reason for the spots but I saw they at some other files too. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval stairs in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 10:48, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Framework of the Annunciation in the church of santa maria annunziata in locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. George in Locorotondo 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remains of ancient Roman bas-relief in Isola Farnese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Santa Maria Assunta (Nepi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice and good QI. But can you fix CAs (see notes)--Lmbuga 20:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Very nice IMO and difficult picture--Lmbuga 21:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for all --Livioandronico2013 21:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tip of trullo in Alberobello.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Review QI

It's impossible vote in QI until tomorrow? --LivioAndronico talk 15:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

No, you can vote as usual on Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. Pleclown (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

4 megapixel

You initiated a discussion on file size, and you chose to exclude me, a regular nominator. Your proposal was undemocratic and irresponsible. It is completely inappropriate for macro photography. How do I complain to Wikimedia administrators about the process you initiated? --Charles (talk) 19:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Good evening Charles,no one was excluded , voted more than 100 people (and at least four administrators!), and was made a "referendum" if this is not democratic do not know what is. However it was decided that will be exceptions, if it is worth it. However you can write here, hello and thanks.--LivioAndronico talk 20:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I've looked at the discussion page, and it seems others agree with me that you rushed the process (not that it was just you). But you did prepare a list of regular nominators and you chose to leave my name off for some reason. --Charles (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

No Charles, here there aren't lists, anyone can vote --LivioAndronico talk 20:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I copy what you said: I would also need the opinion of: @Lmbuga:@Pleclown:@Lewis Hulbert:@Spurzem:@Johann Jaritz:@Llez:@ArildV:@Jacek Halicki:@Hubertl:@Berthold Werner:@Famberhorst:@Slaunger:@PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ:@Jebulon:@Ram-Man:@Poco a poco:@Cayambe:@Christian Ferrer:@Isiwal:@Crisco 1492:@Daniel Case: Sorry if I forgot someone.
I assume you somehow invited them to vote. How were the rest of us supposed to know there was an important discussion going on? --Charles (talk) 20:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Charles mean anything to you the phrase: Sorry if I forgot someone? However, I honestly do not even have never seen you...Besides, those who participate here must also follow the discussions (visible to all) and not complain because you have not done--LivioAndronico talk 20:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

The discussion was only visible to those who chose to open the talk page. That is why I am complaining about your actions. Why would I choose to open the talk page? If you want to start a debate like this, then please signpost it where we go every day to nominate images. That I think is common courtesy and is better than having a semi-private debate with the people YOU choose. --Charles (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Anyone can open it if interested, if somebody is NEGLIGENT not my fault, though I have nothing else to do, go to mourn them, for me this discussion is pointless.Bye. --LivioAndronico talk 20:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the church of San Tolomeo (Nepi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval statue of St. George in the Church Madonna della Greca in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spanish cannon of Aragon castle in Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Left face on the town hall in Nepi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment can you remove CA? --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 13:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)  Done but how the hell do you find these things? I had to enlarge it to 200%! --Livioandronico2013 15:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterfall of Cavaterra in Nepi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City Hall of Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trullo with sign in Alberobello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barely of good quality due to the crop on the left --Moroder 07:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Template PH

Hello.

You can use it :

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

on your user page.

Regards.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Merci ComputerHotline--LivioAndronico talk 18:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculptures above the entrance of Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter's Basilica at night HD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't agree that this is good compo, but this is probably not so relevant for QI. The quality is really good and has FP potential, but the crop would probably not help there. --DXR 10:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone bridge in Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Please, be respectful

Hello Livio, I am pretty disappointed with your reactions today:

• It is the first time I see my vote being removed by anybody else since I am in Commons, and I have been here for a while. Please, don't do it again, that shows no respect to others' opinions.
• This comment is an insult and usually ends up in a block, especially when it is coming from a user with block history. Please, keep those things for you before clicking on Save.

Please, understand this comment as an attempt to calm things down and actually outside of "public places". Regards. Poco² 10:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Poco² Your vote was ridiculous, and my block was already widely said that was made in bad faith. I do not know what you means by "public places", however, if you believe Block, I do not care!--LivioAndronico talk 10:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Ach, Livio, you say "Your vote was ridiculous", I see that you have no intention to let it be and change your offensive way to approach others. I see that you are fine with people, as long as they support your work and you cannot handle criticism. In that case you will have a tough time here in Commons. A "public place" is one, like FPC, where people are invited to participate and where you expect lots of people watching, a talk page is a bit different. Regarding blocking. I have never blocked anybody for a topic where I was also involved. I would ask others to study the case and determine whether a block would be the best for the project. My hope coming here was to close the topic in a friendly way, but I see that it isn't possible. A pity. Regards. Poco² 10:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Poco² Instead you could do a bit of self-criticism. I never used phrases like : I have to say that if I have vote in some of your former nominations I'd have opposed or I suggest you to keep on working in your photographic skills, development and -if possible- equipment and go back to this place in one year!!! You've declined dozens of my photos, and I've never complained ??? NO. One thing is to decline or oppose, another is to join the personal sphere! Even I could say, how the hell do you do with a Mark II to make all that noise? Or those distortions? Because i'm polite and did not, but if I did, you certainly would not like.And then they told me dozens of times ridiculous or be serious ... we want to block half common?--LivioAndronico talk 11:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

and above all ... what the hell it means :Ach? --LivioAndronico talk 11:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

And also your comment is offensive to those 17 people, I repeat 17 !!! I have voted for support .... do you think you are better than them? You should apologize to them more than me.--LivioAndronico talk 11:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Talking to you is a waste of time. I prefer investing my time in more productive activities. Bye. Poco² 11:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

The truth gets hurt Poco² --LivioAndronico talk 11:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Livio, you are obviously the one here who cannot get around with criticism. I expect everybody to be sincere when it comes to my pictures because that is what helps me to learn and get further. But I have never reacted as you do. Regarding noise and distortion of my former camera, you will have to be more concrete. I don't see a way to introduce noise by myself. Over. Poco² 11:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quizás es mejor en español Poco², no es un problema si alguien me critica una foto es un problema si entré en el personal. Limitado a partir de ahora a criticar mis fotos y no hables de mi equipo o mis tiempos de descanso o más --LivioAndronico talk 11:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Castello Orsini-Odescalchi (Bracciano).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church Madonna della Greca in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabernacle of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpit of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 19:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the Rosary in St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baptistery of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI but the crop below is not good -- Spurzem 12:56, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Better Lothar? Danke --Livioandronico2013 13:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tip of Lateran obelisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Block

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "I was just answering the page [6],what I would do to uncivilized? --LivioAndronico talk 17:34, 19 April 2015 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Sorry to say, but Natuur12 and Colin are right. Please take time to think about your behaviour, and come back with a lower profile. Yann (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC) Thanks Yann,I come instigated, also amministrators, and only I pay, thanks as always. Anyway I'll never have a low profile, Regards.--LivioAndronico talk 07:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 7 days. The reason for the block is You have been warned at the AN/U-report. Yet your last comment was rather uncivil. Making people look bad repeatedly is disturbing and again, uncivil. Because this is a structural problem looking at the link and because your previous block lasted 3 days, you fail to show any self reflection and you keep blaming others for your behavior I set the block length at 7 days. Please change your behavior and stop attacking A. Savin, Poco a poco, Colin and others. It doesn't matter how good of a photographer you are but if this continues I wont hesitate to block you for a much longer period. Consider this your last change (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Natuur12 (talk) 17:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

It's not right,what I would do to uncivilized?--LivioAndronico talk 17:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Latest example: Here Colin, another of the four ..... the only edit only and only to decline my photos, Isn't forbit ask to other a opinion and where are personal insults? Natuur12 (talk) 17:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Did I not say what I wrote Natuur12, I asked what was uncivilized!--LivioAndronico talk 17:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Mattbuck can you check this situation please? For me isn't normal--LivioAndronico talk 17:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

(after edit conflict) Let me spell it out than. In your latest comment you where deviding editors into a clique, suggestive comments "the only edit only and only to decline my photos" -> Colin often judges FP candidates and suggesting that "the only edit only and only to decline my photos" is uncivil. Natuur12 (talk) 17:47, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

You have a very personal concept of incivility Natuur12,I must say...for you this is incivility ? --LivioAndronico talk 17:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Just to be sure, that last comment was just the the drop that made the bucket overflow. Other problems which also leaded to this block like I exlained in my "block notice" have been discussied at AN/U. It is about the structural behaviour, not just the single comment. Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Do things without asking the opinion of other administrators can not find it a great idea Natuur12, partly because the "other problems" are invented as my block last time. I was just defending, however, expect the response to my request for unblock and see, if they believe that I'm wrong, you're right. Anyway, your notice get it only you, which means ad hominem? At man?--LivioAndronico talk 17:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

It's latin "for to the (man|person)", see en:ad hominem for the context. Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

I know the Latin Natuur12,maybe you don't known LivioAndronico I live in Rome .... But you could send me the link so I understand what you mean --LivioAndronico talk 18:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

• Natuur12 I suspect that LivioAndronico really doesn't understand that the editing was uncivil. Some of the wikis tolerate this kind of behavior, and I've seen a lot of incivility on Commons, including from administrators. I want to thank you for standing for civility. At the same time I don't want LivioAndronico to be the scapegoat. I don't consider the complaint about Livio to have been particularly civil, either. So what I suggest is that if Livio makes a commitment to improving the tone of his posts, to creating cooperation and collaboration, and dropping the idea others are doing something bad -- even if they might make mistakes -- that he may be unblocked sooner than the 7 days.
• Livio, I'd urge you to think about how your posts looked to others. If you can find that you could have done better, I suggest you apologize and commit to doing better in the future. Had you simply said something like, "I'm sorry, I will be more careful in the future," when the complaint was filed, instead of "defending" yourself, nothing would have happened to you, beyond maybe a warning. Try reading meatball:DefendEachOther and understand it. When someone has a complaint about me, and I defend myself and try to claim that I did nothing wrong. it makes them angry, that's very normal. It does that even if I don't complain about them, and if I do, if I make some counterattack, it's even worse. It doesn't really matter if I did something wrong or not. People want to feel safe for the future, and if you deny you did anything wrong, they think you will repeat what you did.
• I will tell you a secret: thank the blocking administrator for enforcing civility policy. It won't cost you a thing. Think about it.
• If you think about the situation and really don't understand at all what as uncivil, ask me and I'll research it carefully. Good luck. --Abd (talk) 01:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Abd for your concern, but it escapes you that others have done more than something bad. I am a referee for 20 years and a father and I know when wrong. Also I have not yet figured out what would be uncivilized, I knows much of an excuse of Natuur12 to block me.--LivioAndronico talk 07:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Livio, you don't know what I know and don't know. I don't believe in "wrong." You act and it has effects. You create the responses you see.

I suggested you not defend yourself, you did not take the suggestion, but no harm. You merely have a blocked talk page so that you aren't tempted so much.

I'm not suggesting you hang your head in shame. Just stop defending -- and start listening, start understanding.

You imagine a world of wrong and bad. The word being used is, by the way, "uncivil," not "uncivilized," which has a very different meaning. "uncivil" means not polite, fighting, causing offense, and includes blaming, imputing evil or badness in others. The clearest measure of incivility is that others take offense. If you express that they are "wrong" for taking offense, you are being uncivil!

People, if you pay attention, are quite predictable. So if you offend them, if it is other than rare, very good chance you are not paying attention, at best, or you may be deliberately offending them. Not paying attention to people, when you can, is uncivil. It is, at least, rude.

At best, you are not recognizing that many people are telling you there is a problem. You seem to be asking what the problem is, but you don't seem to want to know. You did not take advantage of my offer to research the history. Your questions are rhetorical. "What did I do?", to me, seems much more a way of saying "I didn't do anything."

I was concerned about one thing, it seemed you had not been adequately warned. So I did look a little. You were warned. Not quite as clearly and not quite as formally as I'd like (I like to see a section on the user talk page that says "Warning" in the section header), but enough that if you didn't recognize it, you weren't paying attention. And not paying attention to what you are being told is uncivil.

As to your being a father, congratulations. Learn well, because what you don't learn, you cannot give to your child. I have seven children and six grandchildren.

You may email me. My goal here was to help you, because I could see that you were headed for a block. Looking at your history, you have no prior experience with warnings and blocks. Number one rule I tell users about being blocked: never argue with the blocking administrator. Ever. Don't rush to put up an unblock template (if there is a rush, you will need to *quickly* handle the reason for the block so that the administrator will lift it, and if you need to put up a template, make sure that it is going to convince a new admin that there is no problem requiring the continuation of the block.) In this case, you showed that you didn't understand the reason for the block. Which would mean that you are likely to repeat the behavior. Therefore you need to learn, including taking the time to think about it.

So, now, take the time. Ask if you don't understand. Saying "others have done something more than bad" is not easily understood, for me. It looks like you are saying others are worse than you. Maybe so. However, the focus is on you, here, not on them. Incivility does not lead to a good end. Learn about this now, you will never regret it. If others are worse, their turn will come.

One more piece of advice. Do not edit anonymously or register a new account. I can predict that if you do, no good will come of it. Just wait the six days. If you need any help, as I mentioned, you may email me. You may email any user who has email enabled, but be careful. Do not email anyone who might complain about it, because email can be cut off, too. I won't complain unless you keep emailing if I ask you to stop. My goal is to return you to being a happy user, your photography is excellent, and all that is needed here is understanding how to work in this community.

Good luck. --Abd (talk) 03:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trulli in Alberobello 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Alberobello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but no beautiful light -- Spurzem 18:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italian way of storing antiquities in Bracciano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco of the cathedral of Nepi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little bit pincushion but acceptable. Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Block

PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ,Charlesjsharp,Hubertl,Isiwal,Johann Jaritz,Halavar,Jacek Halicki,Cayambe,Christian Ferrer,Spurzem,XRay,Llez,Moroder,Cccefalon,Famberhorst,Lmbuga,Daniel Case,Laitche,Diliff,Ram-Man,Berthold Werner,Slaunger I was blocked (probably someone will say finally ) and for a week, or more, I will not be able to evaluate, upload or comment on your photos or mine. A hug --LivioAndronico talk 12:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

LivioAndronico, when your block expires and you return please be very careful not to assume that an objection to one of your photos at FPC is a personal attack on you. Everyone who submits images to FPC finds that people sometimes vote against them for reasons that they do not understand or do not agree with. That is just part of the process and has to be accepted. If it happens again, which it may, either do not respond at all or restrict yourself to a brief comment saying why you disagree with the reason for the oppose vote. Don't comment on the individual voter, and don't get drawn into angry exchanges. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks MichaelMaggs, but as always, if someone declines or opposes a photo I have never had problems (ask people mentioned above, one of your choice!). But if they attack me personally, with the sentences already abundantly I mentioned, or an administrator who already blocked me unfairly puts negative votes to my photos and often without even motivate them, then do not sit well with me.Grazie --LivioAndronico talk 15:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

MichaelMaggs I leave you three [7][8][9] of the many cases in which not only did not have the least problems but even I thanked ...Ciao--LivioAndronico talk 16:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Lots of people have offered you good advice, but without exception you have simply tried to justify your behaviour. Your latest comments, below, have now led to your talk page access being revoked as well (a course of action that I fully agree with). Please understand that unless you are prepared to change your approach any further block, when you return, is likely to be even longer. At the moment you are not demonstrating that your presence is a net benefit to the Wikimedia Commons community. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Block 2

Colin laughs best who laughs last ....and Natuur12 no, you haven't warned me, I still have to figure out what meant exactly, you should send me the link of the explanation before and no later having blocked, however, we'll talk.--LivioAndronico talk 19:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Warning. Natuur12 (talk) 19:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Natuur12 I repeat :I still have to figure out what meant exactly, you should send me the link of the explanation before and no later having blocked--LivioAndronico talk 19:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

I talk about this [10] --LivioAndronico talk 19:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

I believe we are done here. I mean that you where using ad hominem instead of valid arguments and ad hominem are uncivil. I warned you that you where uncivil, you where uncivil again and you ended up blocked. I already explained why your last comment was uncivil and given your responce there is nothing more I can do for you. If you fail to see that comments like: Made from usually only vendetta from the usual A.Savin who puts the negative votes on the FP only to me and without even motivate are uncivil I won't succeed in making you understand the point. And please stop pinging me. This talk page is on my watch list so I will read your message even without the ping. Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Can you see? We have a different way of seeing the world, I put the table to let you see and you get nervous. however how was it saidThat is a pity as it brings fuel to the fire that some users often like to start, claiming that admins are a closed club who support each other nomatter what.--LivioAndronico talk 20:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

That last comment was uncivil and some of your comments (like this one) are disruptive so I blocked your talk page as well. Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dome of Church of St. george in Locorotondo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of Church of St. george in Locorotondo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Castello Orsini-Odescalchi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street lamp (Isola Farnese - Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'm not sure with the crop, but good quality--Lmbuga 11:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC) what do you mean Lmbuga? If you can explain I try to improve,thanks --Livioandronico2013 11:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plate on San Pancrazio (Isola Farnese - Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar of Church of San Tolomeo (Nepi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic of the vault of the chapel of San Zeno (IX century).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ascension of Jesus among the apostles and the Virgin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Column of Peace (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipe organ of St. George in Locorotondo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tip of Trullo in Alberobello 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Saint Peter in Saint Peter's Square night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of the flag of the Aragonese Castle in Taranto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one's sharp all around --Daniel Case 23:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pancrazio (Isola Farnese - Roma).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pancrazio (Isola Farnese - Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Lo siento (es)

No me había enterado. No sabía nada. He preferido responderte aquí y no en el correo.

No soy capaz de saber lo ocurrido por mi problema con el inglés: No entiendo y supondría horas intuír lo ocurrido.

No creo que nadie actuase de mala fe, pero entiendo que haya conflictos. La verdad es que me cuesta creer que alguno de los implicados, por el contacto continuo que con ellos tengo, pueda haber tenido mala fe.

Vuelve con calma y limita tu libertad de expresión. Piensa que se castigan más las formas que los contenidos. Piensa que, a pesar de mi buena fe, un usuario atentó en su momento contra mi libertad de expresión prohibiéndome editar en sus fotos, que ese usuario denegó fotos que yo propuse en FP con intención puramente revanchista y el bloqueado he sido yo por insultarlo. No se me permitió ni siquiera la defensa y la justificación (se me bloqueó sin realizar un juicio, y no preventivamente): Se castiga frecuentemente sin juicio: Se atiende exclusivamente a las formas. No se entiende que una mala palabra a tiempo es mejor que una escalada injustificable de acciones revanchistas.

Aquí se castiga la reacción agresiva ante una violación del derecho de expresión, pero muy raras veces es castigada la violación de los derechos de expresión o la revancha. Yo prefiero insultar a actuar en revancha. Creo que es más ético y más cívico. Pero aquí la vigilancia de la revancha es pobre. Pero aquí importa más la aparente tranquilidad que la tranquilidad verdadera, y es por eso por lo que palabras como las que estoy diciendo podrían ser motivo de bloqueo.

No te desanimes. Calma. Limita tu libertad de expresión cuando te sientas agredido. A ti te puede resultar fácil pues puedes contestar en inglés. A mí me resulta casi imposible. Yo solamente siento impotencia. En mi caso el realmente agredido he sido yo y hasta temo ser agredido por en estas palabras reflexionar y decir lo que pienso.

Siento impotencia además de por no poder expresarme correctamente en inglés, porque, a pesar de no tener ningún ánimo de revancha, tengo miedo. Miedo que no me permite hacer cosas que los demás pueden: Hoy me encuentro con el hecho de no poder juzgar las propuestas en QIC de un usuario. Mañana (un mañana cualquiera) me ocurrirá con otro y con otro, y con otro.

Si has de denegar muchas imágenes de un usuario, no lo hagas. Es mejor no decir en QIC lo que se piensa de todas las imágenes que revisas. Déjalas pasar. Comenta solamente algunas de las que miras. Comenta especialmente las de la gente buena, las de los que consideres que con seguridad no tienen el corazón y la mirada henchida de vanagloria: Son casi todos (todos menos casi nadie en mi opinión).

Por cada cinco imágenes que comento, reviso diez, quince, veinte. A veces me arriesgo a comentar consciente del riesgo. Con muy pocos no tengo miedo ninguno.

Es duro comentar con buena fe y sin ningún ánimo de vanagloria y, al mismo tiempo, tener miedo. --Lmbuga (talk) 14:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Yo, por mi dominio del inglés, por la falta de verdaderos amigos poderosos, me siento indefenso. En todas las comunidades, por desgracia, el poder importa.--Lmbuga (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Ánimo: No todos somos iguales. Algunos consideramos normalmente que los demás no nos persiguen y, cuando vemos que vienen decididamente a hacernos daño, no podemos creérnoslo e insultamos por impotencia sabiendo que de esa manera preservamos el equilibrio y equidad de nuestro proceder diario.--Lmbuga (talk) 15:54, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedral of Santa Maria Assunta (Nepi).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Santa Maria Assunta (Nepi).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Photografing in churches

Hi, mi complimento con te per il tuo lavoro molto utile per WP e per la qualitá delle foto sempre migliori. Vedo che fai molti interni di chiese ed immagino che utilizzi un treppiede. Io ho una esperienza piuttosto negativa per foto nelle chiese in Italia, non cosí da noi in Alto Adige, perché spesso mi viene fatto divieto di fotografare e mi viene chiesto di chiedere la autorizzazione come minimo al parroco se non alla curia. Un caro saluto e grazie --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Anche qui è così Wolfgang,solo che sono italiano e diciamo che non "vedo" i cartelli di divieto....quando se ne sono accorti ho già fatto . Grazie ciao.--LivioAndronico talk 07:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Fatto a fin di bene! Capito. Graziee --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Naturalmente Wolfgang se tu venissi a Roma questa estate saresti mio ospite e ti farei vedere come si fà --LivioAndronico talk 20:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Wolfgangs Worten kann ich mich nur anschließen! --Hubertl (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Bernardo alle Terme (Rome) - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere - Chapel ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 18:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica dei santi Giovanni e Paolo al Celio - Intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Thomas of Villanova by Gianlorenzo Bernini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archbasilica of St. John Lateran HD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Moroder 10:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Pius IX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Saint Lawrence outside the Walls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Pope Pius IX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spoleto Cathedral - Intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spoleto Cathedral - intern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Bernini's Parish Church in Castel Gandolfo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Tolomeo (Nepi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Gregorius XVI on fountain in the Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic with the inscription Leonardo on the gallery of the Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Gregorius XVI on fountain in the Vatican Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stairs of Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intern of Duomo di Spoleto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Innocentius II in Santa Maria in Trastevere (Rome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere -Natività of Etienne Parrocel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar and Ciborium of Santa Maria in Trastevere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere - Cappella Altemps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere - Apse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello! Please, you could increase the size (MB) of this picture? For 1,72 MB I think it's too low. Thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk),ciao --LivioAndronico talk 07:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you (:S), but please, you could increase slightly (just slightly) the resolution of this picture? 1680 × 1121 pixels are too low for FP. And thanks for all again! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

 Done 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) --LivioAndronico talk 07:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)