User talk:Lempkesfabriek

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lempkesfabriek!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 16:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PSV logo.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:PSV logo.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-CrazyPhunk (talk) 09:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Lempkesfabriek!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lempkesfabriek, ik zie dat je weer enkele foto's van beelden in Eindhoven hebt bijgeplaatst. Bij een beeld zie ik zelfs het naambordje staan. Zou je ajb naam van het beeld/naam van de beeldhouwer en datum in de gegevens willen bijvoegen, dan kunnen ook anderen meeprofiteren van de foto's voor andere artikelen. Zo als je het nu doet blijft het wel erg exclusief. Groetend --Gerardus (talk) 06:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard, toevallig ben ik het net aan het opzoeken. Ik had wel verwacht dat het ergens te vinden was, maar helaas is dat niet. Tijdens het maken was ik te lui om naar de naamplaatjes te kijken (schaam), maar ik zal het onthouden en de kunstenaars, indien mogelijk of even opschrijven als ik in het park ben. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 06:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC) Bij die ene foto met naambordje is het onleesbaar (zelfs op het origineel) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 06:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo L, bedankt voor je (wel erg snelle) reactie. Bedankt voor je toezegging. Anderen smachten naar foto's van beelden, opdat artikelen kunnen worden verrijkt met illustraties. Groetjes, Gerard ---Gerardus (talk) 06:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC) Is er in Eindhoven (bij gebrek aan een goeie website)misschien een foldertje te vinden over kunst in de openbare ruimte van Eindhoven (VVV bijv.)? Er is trouwens ook nog een enorme partij kunst te vinden op het terrein van de TUE. Groetjes--Gerardus (talk) 07:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er is nog zoveel te fotograferen in Eindhoven, maar ik zal wel eens wat extra beelden "meenemen" in een reportage. Ik weet niet of er goede beeldenboeken bestaan, waarin iemand in één opslag kan zien van wie een kunstwerk is, anders zal ik eens kijken bij de VVV. Speciaal voor de kunstliefhebbers. ;-) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nu al zie ik zoveel prima foto's verschijnen (meer beeld minder park), dat een leek je al snel voor een kunstliefhebber zou houden. Kijk maar uit of je behoort tot het exclusieve groepje dat zich met beeldende kunst in de openbare ruimte (KOR)bezig houdt. Overigens is KOR niet hetzelfde als Openbare Kunst (OK). Een schilderij in een museum is wel OK, maar geen KOR. Als je dus in het hoofdstuk KOR (Eindhoven) verwijst naar het artikel OK lijkt mij dat dus onjuist. Kijk er nog eens naar. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 07:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ik begrijp wat je bedoelt en het zijn inderdaad verschillen (die een kunstliefhebber er uithaalt), maar waar het mij omgaat is dat er één artikel is waarbij we alle kunstuitingen kunnen plaatsen. Het artikel heet dan ook Openbare kunst in Eindhoven, dat toch wel als overkoepelend kan worden gezien, toch? Misschien heb ik het mis, maar wat had jij als idee van de opzet? Ik heb geen voorkeur anders dan alles in één artikel te plaatsen, namen van de artikelen maken mij niet zo veel uit. Om één en ander te verduidelijken, nog even mijn mening: ik heb een hekel aan het "lemma-zieke" wikipedia dat af en toe wel lijkt op wedstrijdje nieuwe artikelen aanmaken, waar je bij voorbeeld voor één onderwerp meer dan 10 verschillende artikelen krijgt. Ikzelf houdt me liever bezig met de inhoud van de artikelen en probeer ze zo veel mogelijk samen te houden, omdat dat veel overzichtelijker is en ik geen zin heb om constant te switchen omdat er een net bepaalde andere definitie zou zijn gebruikt. In de kunst telt dat natuurlijk ook en weet ik dat het voor sommige kunstliefhebbers onacceptabel is om de "platte Kunst" ("plat" zowel tweedimensionaal als in de andere betekenis) in de Berenkuil of een gemanipuleerd verkeersbord als kunst te zien; persoonlijk vind ik het beide kunstwerken, of beter gezegd kunstuitingen, maar dat had je al begrepen denk ik). Ik heb het artikel dus "Openbare Kunst" genoemd, en daar past Kunst in de Openbare ruimte bij, toch? En om nog verder in definities te verzanden: Sprekend over Beeldende kunst in andere lemma's is er snel bijgevoegd dat het enkel om driedemensionale kunst kan gaan om bepaalde projecten (graffiti?) buiten te sluiten. Mijns inziens zou Glow dan bijvoorbeeld niet als beeldende kunst aangeduid kunnen worden, terwijl het in mijn beleving wel kan.) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 08:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos from skyscrapercity.com

Hi, I saw you uploaded some photos from some forums - could you please complete the information box correctly, citing the source as those forums, and also tag the images using {{Crop}} to get the borders removed? Thanks, they look like good photos. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I add the crop-tag it seems to me that the information box is correctly completed. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 07:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hemelrijken02.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Openbare kunst

Beste L, dit is wel erg veel in 1 keer.

Ik bedoelde te zeggen dat ook de inhoud van musea openbare kunst is, daarom is de titel voor je artikel gewoon niet juist. Openbaar betekent niet: buiten, op straat. Het duidt er gewoon op dat het niet privé is, dus van ons allemaal.
Beeldhouwkunst of drie-dimensionale kunst: omvat zo verschrikkelijk veel (zie Category:Modern sculptors).en alle daartoe gerekend kunstvormen, zoals lichtkunst, kinetische kunst of conceptuele kunst (zie Image:Walter de Maria Vertikaler Erdkilometer.jpg.
Verkeersborden: zie de recent door mij opgeladen foto Image:Marl Wewerka.JPG.

Ik heb eerlijk gezegd geen waardeoordeel over deze kunstuitingen. Als fotograaf of als kunstliefhebber, als je voor Wikipedia werkt moet je neutraal zijn en niet selectief of weglatend.

Graffiti is een typisch voorbeeld van: waartoe reken je het. Als je denkt er veel van te fotograferen, maak er dan gewoon een nieuw artikel of op Commons een nieuwe Category van. Als we dan niet kunnen kiezen tussen schilderkunst of beeldhouwkunst, wel dan plakken we het direct onder beeldende kunst (in zijn algemeen). Gaat het om een enkele foto pleeg dan overleg.

Ik hoor het wel of dit iets helpt. Til er niet zo zwaar aan. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 09:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gerardus, ík til er niet te zwaar aan hoor, maar ben inmiddels enkele ervaringen rijker op wikipedia, vandaar. Ikzelf heb gewoon het idee van laten we eerst het artikel maar eens vullen voordat er überhaupt aan splitsingen en "uitsluiten" van kunstwerken wordt gedacht, maar dat is niet de algemene tendens (zoals dat er nu op twee pagina's een overleg loopt over één artikel, waarin slechts één gebruiker wijzigingen heeft aangebracht ;-) ). Btw, de titel van het artikel was wel juist, er waren/zijn alleen nog geen kunstwerken geplaatst van "binnen", maar die ruimte is er zeker (en anders heb ik die zojuist gecreëerd...). :) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 10:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dat is nu juist het punt, L, binnen mag niet. In Nederland geldt FOP (Freedom of Panorama) voor drie-dimensionale objecten(architectuur/beeldhouwkunst) die blijvend deel uitmaken van de openbare ruimte (het zogenaamde panorama). (Frankrijk, België, Italië, USA mag zelfs dat niet! Duitsland, Oostenrijk, Zwitserland weer wel) De kwestie openbare kunst ligt dus iets gecompliceerder (copyright). Dat ik de discussie hier voer komt, omdat het over foto's gaat en die horen hier op Wikimedia Commons thuis en die zijn vervolgens beschikbaar voor alle andere wikipedia's. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 10:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, maar dat is toch echt een ander discussie of iets met copyright heeft te maken of niet. Kunstwerken kunnen nog steeds geplaatst worden (enkel de foto niet). Hier, op commons, gaat het toevallig over foto's, maar het artikel op wikipediaNL is meer dan alleen foto's. Een vervolgvraag: een schilderij in het stadhuis mag dus wel...? (Als ik het goed lees bij Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#The_Netherlands) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 11:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je hebt gelijk L, ik ben geen censor en dat wil ik ook niet zijn. Mij gaat het om de foto's (als illustratie bij welk artikel dan ook) en niet om de tekst van het artikel, daar buigen anderen zich maar over. Het artikel ziet er uit als een lijst van foto's met begeleidende tekst, vandaar mijn belangstelling. De naam van het artikel is iets anders en de huidige naam dekt de lading niet. De discussie hierover hoort hier inderdaad niet thuis, maar ik schreef al: dat is toeval, omdat ik je toch aan het complimenteren was over de foto's. Ik ken de tekst van de FOP in Nederland, maar niet de jurisprudentie. Wat is nog openbare ruimte? De entreehal van het stadhuis/postkantoor/ziekenhuis? De gangen, de kantoorruimtes, de wachtruimtes? Zeker niet! Wat jouw schilderij betreft: moderne kunst of historisch (kunstenaar al 70 jaar dood)? Ik waag me er bij mijn fotografiesessies liever niet aan. Te veel foto's heb ik al zien verwijderen door de haken en ogen rond copyright en licenties t.a.v. kunst. --Gerardus (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Ik had recentelijk nog een discussie hier op Commons over een beeld, dat in Madrid onder een overluifelend deel van een gebouw stond, waardoor men meende dat dit binnen was en ik er vast van overtuigd was, dat dit buiten was. Alleen de verklaring van het Museum (dat was het gebouw) dat men dit zag als publieksruimte (een plein voor de stad!) hielp. --Gerardus (talk) 12:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, duidelijk Gerardus. Het is inderdaad nogal eens lastig wat wel en wat niet meer onder "copyright" valt. Ik was zelf in mijn enthousiasme de commons-politie vergeten. Inderdaad dekt de lading niet de gehele titel van artikel (vooralsnog), maar ik houd het lekker ff breed, zien we daarna wel weer verder. Picasso's, Kandinsky's en Mondriaantjes zijn copyright-vrij zie ik, dus kan er zelfs uit het van Abbe nog van alles gebruikt worden. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Als je daar mag fotograferen. Wat zeg je nu, Picasso vrij? Dan zul je toch echt nog een jaar of dertig/veertig moeten wachten (8 april 2043). De beelden die je ziet vallen weer onder FOP (je bedoelt waarschijnlijk die in Rotterdam en zo?).--Gerardus (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Klopt, ik had verkeerd gekeken. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swing

Hi L, mooi die foto's van Swing. Opmerkelijk beeld van Arie Berkulin. Met meer foto's van hetzelfde object biedt je ook een rijkere keus aan degene die één van de foto's wil gebruiken. Groetjes, --Gerardus (talk) 06:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Gerard, vraag je nu ook al om nóg meer foto's... ;) ...binnenkort komt er misschien een leuke serie aan... Het is ongelofelijk hoeveel kunst er stiekem te bewonderen is. Ik ben al bij de TU wezen kijken, maar het blijft een toch een a-inspirerende omgeving. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, dat je dat van me denkt (?!). Eindhoven, Tilburg, Rotterdam en zoveel plaatsen elders in de wereld. Universiteitsterreinen en beelden: er staan er altijd meer dan je denkt, geen mens ziet ze, vaak staan er mooiere exemplaren dan in menig stadspark/plantsoen. Succes.--Gerardus (talk) 08:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wat denk ik van je Gerard? (er stond in een knipoogje in mijn tekst, dus als je iets als vervelend hebt ervaren: het was niet mijn bedoeling). Binnenkort een nieuwe poging maken op het terrein. Ter info: de kunstwerken die ik mooi vond (en gefotografeerd heb) stonden niet vermeld op tue.nl bij de kunstwerken, en het kunstwerk dat ik absoluut niets vond (en dus niet fotografeerde) bleek van Le Corbusier... (kan ik me nog verschuilen dat het daglicht was en het kunstwerk bedoeld is voor de nacht.) :) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 08:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo L, bedankt voor de reusachtige serie foto's, waaronder Le Corbusier. Op een betere locatie waarschijnlijk mooier? Meer dan mooi de wandsculptuur op de voorgevel van het stadhuis. Ik dacht meteen Wessel Couzijn, maar kan er niets over vinden. Zoek jij het nog uit in Eindhoven zelf? Graag. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dank je Gerard, de ,ijst zal nog wel een keer verder aangevuld worden. :-) Over het kunstwerk aan het stadhuis heb ik niets kunnen vinden; anders moet je zelf even contact opnemen met de gemeente, die behoren het te weten. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 14:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Kunstwerk_Evoluon01b.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kunstwerk_Evoluon01b.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lupo 12:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eindhovense blaadjes02.jpg

You've uploaded a derivative work

We're sorry, but Image:Eindhovense blaadjes02.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

AVRS () 10:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuwe foto's

Hallo L, bedankt voor de nieuwe foto's van kunstwerken in Eindhoven. Met name Onbekend9 maakt indruk op me. Van wie kan dat zijn, het ziet er redelijk oud (ook qua stijl) uit. Hopelijk komen we dat nog eens te weten. Arthur Spronken op het Gemeentehuis (sorry: Stadhuis) dat was zuiver toeval. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 08:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

haha, ja Gerard; maar ik zie "stadhuis" er altijd in koeienletters op staan. ;-) En speciaal voor je heb ik nog een onbekend negentje geplaatst. Er stond geen naamplaatje bij, maar de natuurlijke barrière die was opgeworpen kan het verborgen hebben. Ik weet niet van wie het zou kunnen zijn. Het kunstwerk staat trouwens wel een beetje weggestopt achter het stadhuis. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weggestopt wil niet altijd zeggen: onbeduidend. De betreffende dienst zet het ook maar ergens neer, zonder veel over de kunstenaar of zijn betekenis te weten. Is er niet zo'n dienst in Eindhoven (Gemeentewerken of zo)? Zulke kleine beelden zijn meestal niet meer à la mode, maar wie weet wie de maker is. Groetend--Gerardus (talk) 13:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mee eens, het was eigenlijk ook meer een algemene opmerking dat geen enkel kunstwerk dat zo verdiend; het was in ieder geval niet bedoeld om het onbeduidend of kwalitatief als minder aan te duiden, het was juist als opmerking richting degene die het geplaatst heeft (al zal die wel niet meelezen :-) ). --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 14:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En je hebt er weer een gevonden. :-) --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DR

Dag Lempkesfabriek, mag ik vragen waar je mee bezig bent? Als je afbeeldingen wilt laten verwijderen dan kan je daartoe een Deletion request indienen. Ik zou je daarom ook willen vragen om op te houden met het uploaden van "nieuwe" afbeeldingen over oudere afbeeldingen heen omdat je niet meer wilt dat de afbeeldingen die jij hebt geupload gebruikt worden. Als je toch hiermee doorgaat zal ik genoodzaakt zijn een blokadeverzoek voor je in te dienen. M.v.g. Silver Spoon (talk) 12:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ik mag mijn eigen afbeeldingen verwijderen, want ik trek het recht op gebruik in. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 12:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daarvoor is de pagina met Deletion requests, als je het recht op gebruik intrekt kan je dat daar aangeven. Groet Silver Spoon (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lempkesfabriek, Creative Commons licenties zijn niet intrekbaar. Aub stoppen met dit vandalisme anders zal je worden geblokkeerd. Multichill (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En toch heb ik ze ingetrokken. Als jij doorgaat met het gebruiken van die foto zal ik helaas een zaak tegen wikipedia moeten aanspannen. --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 13:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je begeeft je op glad ijs. Zie en:Wikipedia:No legal threats & nl:Wikipedia:Niet dreigen met juridische actie. Multichill (talk) 13:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ik denk eerder dat jij je op glad ijs begeeft! --Lempkesfabriek (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Waarom denk je dat? Zou je jezelf misschien wat willen verduidelijken? Multichill (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wiki-coendillenstandbeeld.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 12:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PSV Inside en PSV Flits.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:PSV Inside en PSV Flits.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 14:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Strijp-R08.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Strijp-R08.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard the Bard 09:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pending permission for images

Hello. On the images listed at User:Rjd0060/sandbox#User:Lempkesfabriek, you added the {{Otrs pending}} template. Unfortunately, after conducting a search, I could not locate the tickets containing the permission to use the images. Please respond on my talk page if you have the ticket numbers, or if you would like to send me the permission. Please note that if you do not respond, the images will be deleted. Thanks! Rjd0060 (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a follow up note about these 139 images. They will be deleted in about 48 hours if you don't respond with the permission to use them. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was handled, and all of the images appropriately tagged with the permission you received from that website. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2005_2007.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2005_2007.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rocket000 (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2007-2009.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2007-2009.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rocket000 (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_home_2008_2009.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kit_body_PSV_home_2008_2009.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rocket000 (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RingEindhovenStrijpsBultje.jpg may be deleted

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

The File:RingEindhovenStrijpsBultje.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot^(talk) 20:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oud-Gestel.png

Hoi, het lijkt alsof je op http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_Eindhoven_-_Oud-Gestel.png ook Oud Kasteel hebt meegekleurd. Hoe heb je deze plaatjes eigenlijk gemaakt? Frankmeulenaar (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Superleague Formula PSV03.jpg

File:Superleague Formula PSV03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 22:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kleine Kunst Stuttgart1b.jpg

File:Kleine Kunst Stuttgart1b.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kleine Kunst Stuttgart1a.jpg

File:Kleine Kunst Stuttgart1a.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 22:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eindhovense blaadjes.jpg

File:Eindhovense blaadjes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 22:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afellay Banner.jpg

File:Afellay Banner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 22:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VanAbbe7.jpg

File:VanAbbe7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VanAbbe Sterren op het Doek.jpg

File:VanAbbe Sterren op het Doek.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:VanAbbe4.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:VanAbbe4.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:VanAbbe4.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

No source information is given about the painting depicted. The picture can stay when the painter has been dead a long enough time, otherwise it would be derivative workVera (talk) 12:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VanAbbeTafelvoetbal.jpg

File:VanAbbeTafelvoetbal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Map Eindhoven - Aanschot.png

And also:

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 12:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying you of an image removal under the DMCA

Some images that you uploaded to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flying_Pins.jpg and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kennedylaan.jpg were removed based on the receipt of a takedown notice made pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 512 (the “DMCA”). The Wikimedia Foundation (“WMF”) takes alleged copyright infringement very seriously and carefully examines each takedown notice received and the image in question for compliance with U.S. copyright law. This image was one of 59 photographs included in a DMCA takedown notice received by WMF of various publicly-installed sculptures around the world created by Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen.

Some of these sculptures are located in countries that recognize “freedom of panorama” for sculptures, while others are not. Currently, U.S. copyright law does not recognize freedom of panorama for works of art, such as sculptures, and thus the copyright holder of a sculpture has the right to exclude others from publishing images of that sculpture, so long as it still enjoys copyright protection. While it is true that some of the sculptures in question here are located in countries whose copyright regime conflicts with the U.S’s regime, current U.S. conflict of law principles indicate that U.S. copyright law would apply in evaluating the scope of a copyright holder’s rights.

WMF strongly supports a change in U.S. copyright law that would extend freedom of panorama to artwork so that more people can experience beautiful and thought-provoking works of art that they would not otherwise be able to enjoy. However, WMF is a U.S.-based organization that must comply with U.S. laws as they presently exist, including U.S. copyright law, conflict of law principles, and the DMCA.

What can you do?

If you want to express your support for the extension of freedom of panorama to works of art (and you are a resident of the United States), you can write your U.S. senators and/or representative.

If you feel that this particular image does not infringe the alleged copyright holder’s rights, you can contest the takedown notice by submitting a “counter-notice” to us. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position and you may wish to consult with an attorney. If you submit a counter-notice, the alleged copyright holder can stop us from restoring the content by suing you. Please note that WMF will not be a party to any legal action that arises from you sending a counter-notice, and that WMF is unable to provide you with legal advice.

More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Filing a Counter-Notice

If you choose to submit a counter-notice, you must send a letter to legal@wikimedia.org asking WMF to restore this image. The letter must comply with DMCA standards and must contain the following:

A link to where the content was before we took it down;
A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you believe the content was taken down mistakenly;
Your name, address, and phone number;
If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; or if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where I can be found”; and finally,
Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, WMF must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter-notice and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter-notice. We will restore this image within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days, provided that the alleged copyright holder does not give notice of suit to restrain re-posting of the material. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rd232 (talk) 23:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1st PSV logo.jpg

File:1st PSV logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

XXN, 19:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo PSV.jpg

File:Logo PSV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Lempkesfabriek

Contents

Image:PSV logo.jpg

Please link images

Photos from skyscrapercity.com

Image:Hemelrijken02.jpg

Openbare kunst

Swing

Image Tagging Image:Kunstwerk_Evoluon01b.jpg

Image:Eindhovense blaadjes02.jpg

Nieuwe foto's

DR

Image:Wiki-coendillenstandbeeld.jpg

Image:PSV Inside en PSV Flits.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Strijp-R08.jpg

Pending permission for images

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2005_2007.png

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2007-2009.png

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_home_2008_2009.png

File:RingEindhovenStrijpsBultje.jpg may be deleted

Oud-Gestel.png

File:Superleague Formula PSV03.jpg

File:Kleine Kunst Stuttgart1b.jpg

File:Kleine Kunst Stuttgart1a.jpg

File:Eindhovense blaadjes.jpg

File:Afellay Banner.jpg

File:VanAbbe7.jpg

File:VanAbbe Sterren op het Doek.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:VanAbbe4.jpg

File:VanAbbeTafelvoetbal.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notifying you of an image removal under the DMCA

What can you do?

Filing a Counter-Notice

Notification about possible deletion

File:1st PSV logo.jpg

File:Logo PSV.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Lempkesfabriek

Please link images

Photos from skyscrapercity.com

Openbare kunst

Swing

Image Tagging Image:Kunstwerk_Evoluon01b.jpg

Nieuwe foto's

DR

Image Tagging Image:Strijp-R08.jpg

Pending permission for images

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2005_2007.png

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_away_2007-2009.png

Copyright status: File:Kit_body_PSV_home_2008_2009.png

File:RingEindhovenStrijpsBultje.jpg may be deleted

Oud-Gestel.png

File source is not properly indicated: File:VanAbbe4.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notifying you of an image removal under the DMCA

What can you do?

Filing a Counter-Notice

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search