User talk:Korall/Arkiv

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Korall!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Please link images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Korall/Arkiv!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leptotes cassius01.JPG is uncategorized since 2 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bird and snake 3.JPG is uncategorized since 13 July 2009.
Image:Kaja.jpg is uncategorized since 18 July 2009.
Image:Cygnus olor juvenile Djurgarden.JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
Image:African dwarf goat.JPG is uncategorized since 23 July 2009.

Hi! I generally try to cathegorize my contributions, but this one was harder to do because there was no pre-existing cathegory of the species. NHow i tried to categorise it but im not a biologist, so im not sure i did it right.--Korall (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Queen caterpiller on milkweed cropped.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 20:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruddy daggerwing side.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Unknown caterpillar2.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum side.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --ComputerHotline 20:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agraulis vanillae butterfly from above.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta leucopsis Djurgarden2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Ianare 20:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inachis io Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 16:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cynthia cardui Malmö Folkets Park 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Böhringer 22:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cynthia cardui Malmö Folkets Park 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Correct --ComputerHotline 07:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Inachis io Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inachis io Lill-Jansskogen.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Kwj2772 (msg) 17:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aglais urticae Malmö Folkets Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DOF is a little shallow, but good capture. Maedin 09:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Issoria lathonia Malmö Folkets Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good view of butterfly. Not ideal, but quality sufficient --George Chernilevsky 19:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cynthia cardui Malmö Folkets Park spreadwing.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 16:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cynthia cardui Malmö Folkets Park 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cynthia cardui Malmö Folkets Park 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieris napi Kronobergsparken.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 07:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieris.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 18:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieris napi Kronobergsparen 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Maedin 18:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chaka Demus and Pliers Stockholm 4th august 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Lill-Jansskogen 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good. Nice colours --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female Sympetrum vulgatum on leaf 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice quality --George Chernilevsky 19:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female sympetrum vulgatum Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 20:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FI

Hello, Korall!

I have made FI nominations of spiders. Please, look it at leisure.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can give Support vote as nominator for second variant of Chaka Demus portrait. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info. Didnt think about that. =)--Korall (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot put Your signature.

It is not necessary to worry. However and me the patience is heavy after a nomination...

Also You can nominate second variant for QI --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana Fern Forest small.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good result of editing --George Chernilevsky 10:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum flaveolum turning Torso.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality macro --George Chernilevsky 07:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argynnis paphia Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice even if crop is tight. -Jcart1534 00:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female Sympetrum vulgatum on uploaders hand 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --George Chernilevsky 14:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thymelicus lineola Lill-Jansskogen 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. Lycaon 18:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karpat.jpg

Hi! You decline that file QI -status, because you say that resolution is too small. Can you asked, if photographer has bigger resolution image? (I'm very sorry my English, it is really shameful) Best regards – EtäKärppä? 17:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The minimum resolution for QI status is 2 million pixels. The image I declined because of size, File:Karpat.jpg was only 12% of that. Of course someone could ask the uploader if the picture is avalible in higher resolution. If you want to, you can do it at User talk:JaskaS. Dont apologize for your english, I think I understood the question, and that is what matters. =) --Korall (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum flaveolum Turning Torso.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I Think it's good--Cesco77 10:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cukrowicz nachbaur Kapelle 1.JPG

I've cropped 36 pixels of either side to remove the distortion, and rebalance the image. Might I ask that you re-examine it? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pier Blankenberge

Hi! Thank you very much for promoting my QI candidate image File:Pier_Blankenberge_R01.jpg! In the mean time, I uploaded a new, cropped version which I think is better. Kind regards, Marc (MJJR)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta leucopsis Djurgarden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Cayambe 09:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! African dwarf goat baby.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 19:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your photos

Hi, Korall!

First, I fully support, if You nominate for FI this:

African dwarf goat baby
Bufo bufo on grass2

Very nice photos.

Second: Helix pomatia in Lill-Jansskogen - very blue colour balance.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Now i tried to fix the snail and nominated the goat and the toad. --Korall (talk) 15:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bufo bufo on grass2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! Possible FP --George Chernilevsky 18:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rana arvalis in Lill-Jansskogen 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Low DOF but great light. Good for QI IMO --Kirua 08:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured seal

Hi, Korall!

You can use this template on self user page:
= {{FP star}}

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much because I was looking for something like that template before, so I started changing my userpage to use it but then I thought that the way I have it now is better because it explains the featured status (that it is on commons and not on some kind of wp) better than the FP star template. --Korall (talk) 02:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stork nest Silves 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Composition is really nice, but birds seems little underexposed --Cesco77 08:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me.--Mbz1 23:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:AD2009Aug07 Natrix natrix 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AD2009Aug07 Natrix natrix 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortuneteller mgx.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent work, really appreciated! -- H005 23:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpg

I have uploaded a new version of this picture! Maybe you would like to change your vote! --Simonizer (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cynthia cardui Grinda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DOF borderline, but ok for me --Cayambe 09:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations

I really appreciate it when one of my pictures gets nominated for FP, but please don't get too hasty. There is a huge difference between a good image and an outstanding one. Personally I take my pictures to contribute scientifically and to provide knowledge and not to decorate myself. --Ernie (talk) 17:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have a lot of FP:s of amphibians and the one I nominated is of good quality and higher resoulution (the acrual size of the frog is bigger than the others) than the existing ones of rana temporaria neither foreground or backgrond is distracting. If i find something I think is really good I nominate for FP, some of them go though and some dont. If you really mind I can always withdraw. --Korall (talk) 17:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I do not mind at all. Your arguments sound firm enough to me. Just wanted to make sure you are not going to shoehorn (my) pictures into the FP process.--Ernie (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ComputerHotline

Thanks for helping out on QI. This user stubbornly refuses to listen to advice and does not answer requests. I have hundreds of pictures myself waiting for an ID to be posted. I personally only post when I have a confirmed ID and sometimes that involves looking up and mailing specialist all over the world. Although I'm a biologist myself, one cannot specialize in every taxon. Sometimes I'm running a bit out of patience with this CH. Kind regards. Lycaon (talk) 20:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know a very good book on dragonflies in Europe (in Swedish) but I have some important things in school right now that I really want to finish before the weekend. If I can help out, im happy to do it. Im planning on going to the library anyway this weekend becuse I have som nice pics of grasshoppers and I heard roumors of a good book. So if the pictures can remain in the nomination page until then, there is a good chance some of them will go trough.--Korall (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Though it is not only up to me of course ;-). If you need help on ID's some time, you can also check out my literature list. Some of those books are really good, others only cover about 10% of the organisms in the area. Lycaon (talk) 05:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reading through this I was wondering if you might – by any chance – know a book on Basidiomycota of the northern and/or southern Alps? --Ernie (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not of the top of my head, but you might try this site to look for field guides. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 06:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bufo bufo on grass2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bufo bufo on grass2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rana Lill-Jansskogen 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Ok and good. --Cayambe 20:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sea at Le Havre 1868

Hello, I cropped the image further: please see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:WLA cma The Sea at Le Havre 1868.jpg. Thanks for reviewing it, Yann (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female Aeshna cyanea laying eggs 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re:Changing taxa

Hello. When I first saw File:Danaus eresimus.JPG, I saw the row of white submarginal spots on both the upper side of the fore wing which made me think it was a Queen. (If you would like to see where the submarginal area is located on the wing please see this where it says "submargin"). According to my field guide, the Soldier lacked these white spots. I did a little more research and found that Soldiers will sometimes have these white spots. And because File:Danaus sp Loxahatchee 2.JPG had the pale spots on the underside of the hind wing, this butterfly is a Soldier. I'm sorry about the confusion, and I'll go back and correct my mistakes. Thank you for notifying me. -Meganmccarty (talk) 01:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is sometimes very hard to correctly identify very similar butterflies, especially when the image quality leaves a lot to desire. I try my best and I am sure you do your best too to in order to provide correct information on the wikimedia projects, but of course anyone can make mistakes sometimes. The good thing is that the wiki technique gives anyone the possibility to correct things to the better. Thank you for the help in search for ID of this particular butterfly. --Korall (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slåttergräsfjäril2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good, QI --George Chernilevsky 20:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum male Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VI nominations

Hi, Korall!

I have a little corrected your VI nominations.

And File:Danaus eresimus.JPG strong need geocode.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 15:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the geocode, however Its not very exact but I remember it was along that bird watching trail that I pointed out. Thank you very much.--Korall (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Approximate geocode too admissible. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female argynnis paphia in Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 18:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruddy daggerwing eating.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice illumination, head good in focus. QI for me --George Chernilevsky 09:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieris napi in Lill-Jansskgoen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phoebis philea (Orange-barred sulphur).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Danaus eresimus (Tropical Queen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Cropping

Re my nomination Young hedgehog.jpg, ignoring the blurry grass for a moment, do you think the original framing[1] is better than the current crop? --Tony Wills (talk) 01:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I really do. It leaves some space for the hedgehog to breath and move. --Korall (talk) 10:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 11:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your VI nominations

Hi, Korall!

I have corrected format of your VI nominations and have considered them. Use them as example for the future your nominations. Scope formatting with link to scope, Used in can be cheked with CheckUsage tool. You can save this Your nominations as example to Your computer.

And, finally. It is good and valued contributions.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Ill try to do it better next time. --Korall (talk) 07:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can look VI candidates at leisure? Lycaon has taken a wikibreak, the sight of the biologist is required.

And about QI seal and FI Star templates. It can be used with parameters (size in pixels).

Example

.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I miss Lycaon too, but I gess he is busy doing important stuff. Supported one candidate but now I have to go back to school, will look at the others later. --Korall (talk) 10:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, scope has minor corrected -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scope in VI as category with detalisation are normal and typically used.
Examle:

Category Building, interior
Category Building, exterior
Category animal, male
Category animal, female
Category plant, flower
Category plant, fruit
Category plant, foliage
Category bird, perched.

etc ...

It is in rules: Commons:Valued_image_scope#Plants

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rädda Barnen matchbox.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Mbz1 17:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matchbox with ladies and umbrella.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matchbox with ladies and umbrella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Mbz1 17:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agraulis vanillae (Gulf fritillary), Pupa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agraulis vanillae (Gulf fritillary), caterpillar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Matchbox_with_ladies_and_umbrella.JPG

File:Matchbox_with_ladies_and_umbrella.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blomfluga på ros.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent -Cayambe 12:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FPC closure

Hi,
aren't 5 support votes with 0 oppose votes enough for an FPC nomination to be successful?
I'm thinking about the alternative of this FPC: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foggy sunset with Brown Pelicans.jpg --Aqwis (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course they are. Im so sorry for doing wrong. How can I make it right?--Korall (talk) 17:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POTD March, 8

Hi, Korall!

Yes, I too thought about it. Probably, flowers (bouquet), instead of a female portrait?

User:Yann put candidate for this day. I have informed it on this offer here: User talk:Yann. You can join.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i have made replacement. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ID help needed

Hi,

I was wondering if you had any idea what order or maybe family the hexapod on this picture belongs to. Have been trying to figure it out for a while now and finally gave up. Any help would be most welcome --Ernie (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I had but I have no education in biology since high school so I really hope there is some other person in the wikimedia project with a better chance. Have you tried the biology group of german wikipedia? Lycaon is a marine biologist but he might have a clue? All species determinations Ive ever done are through borrowing books at the library or asking other wikimedians. I wish you the best of luck!--Korall (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought you were biologist too. Well, thanks for your help anyways. --Ernie (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am amazed by biology but my guess is that studying biology at college level would involve learning a lot of things by heart and the course Ive ever had that was closest to biology was biochemstry (which to me was like learning the telephone directory), and it kind of scared me away from the subject. --Korall (talk) 21:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Studying any science can sometimes get a bit overwhelming or maybe even boring, but as soon as you are done with the standard curriculum and you can choose your own direction things get a little more exciting. That German Taxonomy Wiki really helped, thanks a lot! The species is a springtail (as I initially thought lol) – Orchesella flavescens to be more precise. One image less to ID! --Ernie (talk) 07:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its not that I dont like to study science, thats one of my favourite things to do, and I am so happy to live in Sweden where there are no fees to study at the universities. But every person kind of have to choose a path since noone can study all the sciences today and I just didnt choose biology. Im a very happy first-year student at the computer science program. Some people think that that means I know a lot about computers and can fix them and stuff, but in reality I am just learning the (fossile?) language Pascal at the moment. --Korall (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would call Pascal everything but ancient. C is still pretty standard these days and it got a couple of years on its back too. --Ernie (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum portrait 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and detail --99of9 05:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum portrait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and detail --99of9 05:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrington Levy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 16:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mito Art Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise, but really interesting tower.--Mbz1 23:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VI nominated set

Hi, Korall!
Very good nomination, but geocoding need.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. They are geocoded now. --Korall (talk) 15:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gasteracantha cancriformis

Gasteracantha cancriformis : Suggest to Valued image. I support. -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ill think abouth that.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danaus eresimus Secret Woods.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for in vivo -- Archaeodontosaurus 09:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danaus plexippus in Secret Woods.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very pretty --99of9 10:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern Mockingbird, Loxahatchee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks like troublesome lighting, but you did well to get the head lit. --99of9 10:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasteracantha cancriformis in Secret Woods.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ventral side very interesting, good quality in vivo.-- Archaeodontosaurus 11:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		The Barnstar of Biology
		The award for very lovely photos of wildlife and other Your tireless contributions. Well done! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --George Chernilevsky ^talk

Thank you very much and happy holidays to you too! Your support and appreciation of my contributions is very valuable to me and than you very much for the barnstar!--Korall (talk) 20:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Racoon clinging to a tree.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Raccoons are meant to be soft :). Well composed. --99of9 02:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gasteracantha cancriformis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphyrapicus varius on palm tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - Darius Baužys 20:21, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Brown Pelican, Pelagic Boat Trip.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brown Pelican, Pelagic Boat Trip.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phocides pigmalion, imago.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Racoon portrait from Hugh Taylor Birch State Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good portrait --Mbdortmund 00:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grey squirrel in Hugh Taylor Birch State Park 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 23:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ardea Alba in Hugh Taylor Birch State Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Yarl 19:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ardea Alba in Hugh Taylor Birch State Park 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Yarl 19:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egretta caerulea in Hugh Taylor Birch State Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great. Yarl 19:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Danaus eresimus.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Danaus eresimus.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--Eusebius (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three birds running.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Makele-90 07:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duck with ducklings in Tradewinds Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Basar 03:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egretta caeruela in Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grey Squirrel in Hugh Taylor Birch State Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness in full resolution is borderline. Please add geotag. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 17:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green caterpillar in Loxahatchee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What a beast. Looks like a branch of a spruce. --MattiPaavola 16:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its supposed to be bright green so I shed some light and rotated the caterpillar to the position and I found it. Hope its still OK. --Korall 19:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, still QI to me. --MattiPaavola 01:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raccoon i Hugh Taylor Birch State Park 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ardea alba spreadwing.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I loved making this picture -- Archaeodontosaurus 13:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great blue heron in Loxahatchee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- Archaeodontosaurus 06:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brown pelican splash.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sharp and very impressive --George Chernilevsky 20:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]