User talk:Kanashimi/Archive 1

File:經衣.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kanashimi!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:刈金.jpg was uncategorized on 8 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:九金.jpg was uncategorized on 8 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neohelota helleri, 海氏大吸木甲; 馬承漢 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21822.jpg

File:Neohelota helleri, 海氏大吸木甲; 馬承漢 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21822.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grammographus kanoi, 黃胸綠虎天牛; 馬承漢 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21823.jpg

File:Grammographus kanoi, 黃胸綠虎天牛; 馬承漢 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21823.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albara reversaria opalescens, 棕線鉤蛾; 王江森 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21825.jpg

File:Albara reversaria opalescens, 棕線鉤蛾; 王江森 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21825.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albara reversaria opalescens, 棕線鉤蛾; 王江森 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21826.jpg

File:Albara reversaria opalescens, 棕線鉤蛾; 王江森 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21826.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amphitorna purpureofascia, 後凹角鉤蛾; 王江森 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21827.jpg

File:Amphitorna purpureofascia, 後凹角鉤蛾; 王江森 2016-08-07 TaiBNET 21827.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot not really helpful

Hi Kanashimi, Cewbot is currently removing very many files from categories like Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 596286 needing categories‎. While many of these files do have some kind of categories, these were often chosen with very little diligence. For example, some editors moved thousands of files to categories that are far too general like Category:Baden-Württemberg (a state) when the files should be moved at least to the level of municipalities. As all these files possess coordinates, it is possible to categorize them very thoroughly. Category names like Photos from Panoramio ID XXXXXX needing categories‎ should actually be read like "needing category check". So I'm not happy if your bot removes files that still haven't been checked thoroughly, and still require maintenance, from these maintenance categories. Regards, --Sitacuisses (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitacuisses: I have stop the task this week. Are we have a standard to distinguish that if a photo is categorized enough? --Kanashimi (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First: The Bot removes two categories from Panoramio files Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories as of 2017-XX-XX and Category:Photos from Panoramio ID XXXXXX needing categories. I think it's fine to remove the date category even if the categorization is insufficient. But the "by ID" category is often helpful to find similar images by the same photographer that require better categories. I don't know about a standard that can serve as a rule for bots. Maybe we could say that if a category has more than e.g. two category levels below itself, it's probably too general. But normally this is decided by human users. That's what we have Template:Check categories for. So the best solution would be to add a "Check categories" button that removes all the "... needing categories" cats after the check. --Sitacuisses (talk) 12:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitacuisses: I may add Template:Check categories instead, but I don't know whether it is a good idea or not if there are thousands of photos with this template... --Kanashimi (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There already are thousands of files with this template; e.g. more than 5000 in Category:Media needing category review as of 1 April 2017 alone. If this template helps to remove the obsolete categories with a single click it's still useful. --Sitacuisses (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I will remove Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories as of 2017-XX-XX and Category:Photos from Panoramio ID XXXXXX needing categories, and add Template:Check categories instead. --Kanashimi (talk) 14:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's better than leaving nothing at all. But maybe it would be even better to leave Category:Photos from Panoramio ID XXXXXX needing categories where it is, since this one groups similar files by one photographer that require a check. If replaced with the general Category:Media needing category review as of XXX, we lose this feature. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitacuisses: I have make a change on GitHub to remove "Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories as of 2017-XX-XX" but not "Category:Photos from Panoramio ID XXXXXX needing categories", "Category:Media needing category review as of XXX". I am sorry that this will not fix the changes the task had made. --Kanashimi (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Sitacuisses (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how Cewbot's edits are a problem. They are at worst a lateral move. If a file's category is too broad, that would need to be fixed independently of these panoramio categories. I don't see this as any different than removing {{Uncategorized}} from a file which has a valid category, even if that category is too broad. These categories are pretty broad. Is that controversial? kennethaw88 • talk 07:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kennethaw88: Unfortunately many users haven't understood how helpful coordinates and user categories can be in categorizing the Panoramio files, and they just keep on moving files across category levels like they've always done. If a file's category is too broad, you may probably not even find that file, since it's in an inappropriate place. If you go to the user category, you may find similar photographs and categorize them perfectly (with the help of the coordinates) in a single run, without wasting time with multiple moves to more general categories. --Sitacuisses (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but they still have the coordinates even without being in the panoramio categories. Most (almost all) of the panoramio user categories have files across many locations. Fine-level categorization isn't necessarily any easier this way than just using a broad category. Someone can go into Category:Baden-Württemberg (or even Category:New South Wales) and find the same coordinates there. In fact, it's easier using the broad category in this case, because they are already grouped geographically. The geographic grouping is almost always better than for any random panoramio user. kennethaw88 • talk 08:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't find coordinates in Category:Baden-Württemberg. You find them on a map (Commons on OSM is another helpful tool). Baden-Württemberg has 11 million inhabitants and 1100 municipalities. No one will look for a specific file in that category except some hardcore category experts. As a geographic group it's pretty much useless. However I found various user categories that group files which follow a travel route or document the surroundings of the photographer's home. --Sitacuisses (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in many Asian countries ends on December 15th.
There is a special prize for Chinese uploaders
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons zh-N users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition.

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:45, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup of Photos from Panoramio needing categories

If your bot Cewbot periodically cleans Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories by date, why doesn't he also clean Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories by ID? Any technical reason or is any other reason? Thanks, anyway, for the regular cleanup. Tm (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is an interesting idea. When I create the bot, Howcheng only asked for Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories by date, so I did not touched Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories by ID. To clean Category:Photos from Panoramio needing categories by ID as well, I need to check the source code again. --Kanashimi (talk) 22:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Howcheng: Thanks for your fast answer. The problem is that if one category is removed, but the other is not, many times what happens is that the file already categorized is recategorized again to an upper or lateral category, wasting and doubling categorization efforts. If the change could be made that would be great, for the reasons stated before. Tm (talk) 23:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquake intensity maps

Please categorize like this: [1]. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 16:46, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thgoiter:

Done How about moving from Category:ShakeMaps to Category:USGS community internet shake maps? --Kanashimi (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As far as I understand, the ShakeMaps are not based upon data from the community (as intensity maps are, cf. [2]). So this should be OK as it is. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 19:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Kanashimi (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019-07-05 JTWC warning map.gif

File:2019-07-05 JTWC warning map.gif is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:2019-07-06 JTWC Tropical Storm 02E (Barbara) warning map.gif.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cewbot

Congratulations! Task 7 was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA 1905 map (en).png

File:2019 JMA 1905 map (en).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA 1905 map (jp).png

File:2019 JMA 1905 map (jp).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2019 JMA 1906 forecast map (en).png

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Hi. Are files like File:JMA Surface Analysis Chart 08-01-2017 00Z.png copyrighted? Sorry that I can't tell the difference from them. --Kanashimi (talk) 10:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I see. --Kanashimi (talk) 10:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I thoughtlessly renamed it as "JTWC wp0819" but please use your original file name and don't add "wp1019" anymore. Sorry for the misunderstanding. - 👦🗣️ 06:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Kanashimi (talk) 06:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA tropical cyclone c forecast map (jp).png

File:2019 JMA tropical cyclone c forecast map (jp).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA tropical cyclone c forecast map (en).png

File:2019 JMA tropical cyclone c forecast map (en).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: It seems no administrator removing the files? After confirmation, I will stop upload from this site. --Kanashimi (talk) 03:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thank you for the bot work request topic list! Very nice! Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 09:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try some days if this list can help peoples. --Kanashimi (talk) 09:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A big thank you from me too. Masum Reza^📞 00:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC forecast map name

Sorry for earlier. Can you make updates to Hagibis? I renamed the file but it seems that you had not updating at anymore. - 👦 08:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Kanashimi (talk) 08:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot is not detecting edits by bots?

Is your bot broken or something? The topic list on COM:BR hasn't been updated. I would have thought that Cewbot is not detecting edits by other bots but I made an edit and your bot hasn't detected my edits either. Masum Reza^📞 08:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Thank you. The bot meets 503 and I restart the bot now. --Kanashimi (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2019 JMA 1908 forecast map (en).png

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop upload files from JMA. --Kanashimi (talk) 22:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (en).png

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (en).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (jp).png

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (jp).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC warning graphics for the Southern Hemisphere?

Now Cewbot does not upload the warning graphics for tropical cyclones in the Southern Hemisphere. 🐱💬 02:53, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed But we should create Southern Hemisphere typhoon season serials. Category:2019 Southern Hemisphere typhoon season track maps --Kanashimi (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (en).png

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (en).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (jp).png

File:2019 JMA 1925 forecast map (jp).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptions not updating?

Hello! I've noticed that the file description for the tracks don't update together with the new versions of the images. This is causing the description to be stuck with its first description. Is it possible to change this in order to update the description to reflect the latest version? Or at least modify the description when a system has been made. Thanks! Chlod (talk) 08:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reporting. The bot updates too many kinds of sources. Do you mean the files like File:2020 CIMSS 29L Eta visible infrared map.GIF? --Kanashimi (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I meant the forecast tracks (such as File:2020 JTWC 22W forecast map.wp2220.gif). Sorry for the confusion. Chlod (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems needing to write some codes. I will find time to do it. --Kanashimi (talk) 10:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Thanks a lot for your help! Chlod (talk) 10:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Kanashimi (talk) 09:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC

Hello Kanashimi Cewbot didn't update for the JTWC warning graphics. HurricaneEdgar 12:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Sorry for late. --Kanashimi (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC and NHC Warning

Good day Kanashimi, I notice that cewbot didn't not update for the JTWC and NHC warning.HurricaneEdgar 10:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 11:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank a lot :) HurricaneEdgar 11:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 CIMSS 02L Bill visible infrared satellite loop.gif and File:2021 CIMSS 02L Two visible infrared satellite loop.gif

Hi:

I had to rename and recategorized these images that your bot wrongly name maps. These ares not maps but a satellite image loops. Please change the naming scheme of your bot.

Pierre cb (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 23:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK Pierre cb (talk) 02:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC Warning ?

HI, Kanashimi I noticed that cewbot did not upload the JTWC Warning for EPAC and WPAC. Thank you HurricaneEdgar 16:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know why, when I access https://www.metoc.navy.mil/jtwc/rss/jtwc.rss?1627948045643 via firefox, it tells me 404 - File or directory not found... Kanashimi (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Website of JTWC is now Fixing sorry making late reply HurricaneEdgar 05:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi kanashimi cewbot did not update now HurricaneEdgar 02:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Geostationary VIS-IR

Hi, There can your bot make update the geology VIR-IR since this is my idea HurricaneEdgar 15:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems we cannot access https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/WP/WP142021/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/himawari-8/ directly. What is the route to get the images? Kanashimi (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the website is down, i already contact the webmaster to fix this issue. HurricaneEdgar 03:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

However, I need get the information of tropical cyclones before uploading images. After the site is up, please tell me the route to get the images, thank you. Kanashimi (talk) 04:32, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Webmaster email me is said.

Hello,

The Lab experienced a power outage which we are working to restore. Apologize for any inconvenience.

Thank you for contacting us.

HurricaneEdgar 17:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will tell, you the route to get image. if the website is up :-) HurricaneEdgar 17:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The website is up now HurricaneEdgar 22:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this is all designation from the JTWC

If you click a designation like WP02 WP02

(this is example)

go to png clean

WP02 Surigae png clean

and click infrared-Gray

Infrared Gray WP02 Surigae

click himawari-8

Himawari-8

and now you can now get the image just click picture HurricaneEdgar 22:42, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can I get image with data from https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/proddemo.html ? So I can know the data of tropical cyclones in the same time... Kanashimi (talk) 23:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

uhmm no all of them here TC of 2021 HurricaneEdgar 23:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So... There are some problems. You can see, when I upload images, I also update data of the tropical cyclone. And sometimes also specify the category of image. If there is no information, I think the image itself is not enough. Is the site master knowing how to get the data of a image? Kanashimi (talk) 23:31, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seen, this is one problem, need more information this. HurricaneEdgar 02:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneEdgar Hi. I find there are several kinds of image to choice.

In https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/AL/AL922021/png_clean/ , how about Infrared/ and Infrared/ ?
And in https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/AL/AL922021/png_clean/Infrared/ , how about goes-17/ ?
What is the best naming of the files? Kanashimi (talk) 00:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I may use "2021 NRL 08E HILDA visible infrared satellite, infrared.png" or "2021 NRL 08E HILDA visible infrared satellite, infrared-gray.png" Kanashimi (talk) 00:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the best image name in the file is 2021 NRL 08E HILDA visible infrared sattellite, infrared-gray.png great title. HurricaneEdgar 02:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So the Infrared/ and Visible/ is not so good? And how about goes-17/ and other satellites? Kanashimi (talk) 02:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i have a link which is good to image here

goes-16 AL himawari-8 WPAC goes-17 EP mg-1 IO himawari-8 SWIO

HurricaneEdgar  02:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

might is this recommended by the title of image for

WPAC: 2021 NRL WP06 visible infrared sattelite if there no name use them, is there a name use this 2021 NRL WP06 Lupit visible infrared sattelite ( this is example )

@HurricaneEdgar I have tried some images. Please check the latest upload. --Kanashimi (talk) 03:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i have notice, your upload the image great as well :) HurricaneEdgar 11:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just to let you know, due to geostationary satellite placements, GOES-17 gives higher resolution pictures for storms in the Eastern Pacific since it is located over the basin; the same goes with GOES-16 in the Atlantic (GOES-17, GOES-16). Great work on the images! Akbermamps (talk) 06:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Akbermamps Thank you, and HurricaneEdgar, may you give me some advices, for the priority of satellite images? Please edit the code below:

var satellite_image_priority = {
	AL : [ 'himawari-8', 'goes-16', 'goes-17', 'mg-1' ],
	CP : [ 'himawari-8', 'goes-16', 'goes-17', 'mg-1' ],
	EP : [ 'himawari-8', 'goes-16', 'goes-17', 'mg-1' ],
	IO : [ 'himawari-8', 'goes-16', 'goes-17', 'mg-1' ],
	SH : [ 'himawari-8', 'goes-16', 'goes-17', 'mg-1' ],
	WP : [ 'himawari-8', 'goes-16', 'goes-17', 'mg-1' ],
};

Kanashimi (talk) 08:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there cewbot did not update HILDA Geostationary as now HurricaneEdgar 05:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems HILDA is not in https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/TC.html anymore, so I cannot get the data of the TC... Kanashimi (talk) 05:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

there is a Data of tc hilda now here https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/EP/EP122021/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/goes-17/ HurricaneEdgar 15:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, when I browser https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/TC.html , it is not in the list, so please upload the TC manually. Kanashimi (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Akbermamps and HurricaneEdgar, I create User:Cewbot/log/20190629/configuration, please update the NRL satellite image priority as you like. --Kanashimi (talk) 21:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone and done it now, though sadly since NRL lumps together multiple basins into the "SH" folder, some images may have resolution problems. Akbermamps (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone 03B

Hello, there is Cyclone 03B, i noticed that Cewbot did not upload of NIO can you fix this thank you. HurricaneEdgar 11:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Kanashimi (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot did not update as now pls fix it thank you HurricaneEdgar 09:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Latest file of https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/IO/IO032021/png_clean/Visible/himawari-8/ and https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/IO/IO032021/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/himawari-8/ are at 30-Sep-2021. It seems there is no new file... Kanashimi (talk) 10:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh, ok thank i cant not visit the website due unstable website HurricaneEdgar 10:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The website is okay anyway I have find this link https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/IO/IO032021/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/msg-1/ can you update it HurricaneEdgar 07:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which is currently update now HurricaneEdgar 07:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may change the configuration to whatever you want. Kanashimi (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Hi, the bot did not update forecast maps and satellite image can you fix this HurricaneEdgar 22:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kanashimi (talk) 22:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Cyclone AUS SWIO SPAC

Hello Kanashimi as the season is now starting AUS SWIO SPAC can you upload a satellite image thank you :) HurricaneEdgar 14:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kanashimi (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot adding {{LicenseReview}} to tistory.com files

Hi, I think your bot has been too active. For instance this file had its license already checked, and this one has a VRT-ticket. Can you plaese correct errors like these? Lymantria (talk) 16:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The algorithm of bot must be improved. Kanashimi (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Hi, Kanashmi I notice that cewbot did not update for satellite image and jtwc warning graphics can you fix thank you HurricaneEdgar 18:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the JTWC images is "fileexists-no-change", and the NRL is not available on the site... Kanashimi (talk) 21:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/WP/WP272021/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/himawari-8/ the NRL IS now available which the JTWC designeted this system as 27W -- HurricaneEdgar 23:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 09:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot LicenseReview error

This bot edit was in error - this isn't a file from Tistory, this is a file about Tistory. The source is a file already reviewed on Commons, there is no additional license review needed. --GRuban (talk) 17:27, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reporting. Is there a method to detect the files that is a file about Tistory? Kanashimi (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi, good day and happy new year Kanashimi! cewbot did not update for sattelite image but NRL has update the image see [3] and [4] HurricaneEdgar 05:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC need update HurricaneEdgar 08:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has a type error... A jpg marked as a gif. Kanashimi (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Hi, Kanashimi the bot did not upload image or JTWC can you fix this thank HurricaneEdgar 02:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 13:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you HurricaneEdgar 13:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

anyway the bot did not upload the sattelite (again) and rv my edit -- HurricaneEdgar 00:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this. Do you mean File:2022 NRL SH932022 INVEST infrared-gray satellite.png? The bot gets from https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2022/SH/SH932022/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/himawari-8/ Are there better source? Kanashimi (talk) 00:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i decide make upload the sattelite could you bot upload here link File:2022 NRL SH932022 INVEST infrared-gray msg-1 satellite.png HurricaneEdgar 01:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I updated File:2022 NRL SH932022 INVEST visible satellite.png, File:2022 NRL SH932022 INVEST infrared-gray satellite.png and User:Cewbot/log/20190629/configuration. Is this what you want? Kanashimi (talk) 01:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

need Update

Hi, Kanashimi the bot did not updated on the sattelite image on invest 92P thank you [File:2022 NRL SH922022 INVEST infrared-gray satellite.png Image] website is currently update as now https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2022/SH/SH922022/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/himawari-8/ -- HurricaneEdgar 12:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I modified User:Cewbot/log/20190629/configuration. Kanashimi (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

bot did not upload

Hi there, the bot did not upload the new desingnated on the JTWC which is 13S HurricaneEdgar 02:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link is currrently update https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2022/SH/SH132022/png_clean/Infrared-Gray/msg-1/ HurricaneEdgar 04:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 23:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much Kanashimi HurricaneEdgar 23:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Hi i saw that BOT did update since March could you fix it. HurricaneEdgar 07:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The bot hung up. I have restarted it. Kanashimi (talk) 08:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there is a new TD which issued now by the RSMC JMA. need update. -- HurricaneEdgar 09:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Cewbot did not update on the sattelite image pls update it -- HurricaneEdgar 03:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kanashimi (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

This bot is placing satellite images of tropical systems in the category of tracks of these systems. For example, I had to remove Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season track maps in this edit : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2022_NRL_AL012022_ONE_visible_satellite.png&diff=661806417&oldid=661698923 Please reconfigure your bot.

このボットは、熱帯システムの衛星画像をこれらのシステムのトラックのカテゴリに配置しています。たとえば、私は削除する必要がありました Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season track maps ボットを再構成してください。

I have modified the code. But it seems no chance to test it recently. --Kanashimi (talk) 10:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Topic list

添加了4个其他的页面，有劳您重启一下本任务（如果没看错的话还需要手工重启）。Stang^★ 00:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kanashimi (talk) 05:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

It seems that BOT Didn't not update (NHC forecast, satellite imagery) could you fix this? HurricaneEdgar 16:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Kanashimi (talk) 21:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season satellite images

Please stop your Cewbot to add this category to images it uploads. This is redondant with Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season and its sub-categories. Pierre cb (talk) 13:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pierre cb: Do you mean that it is better to put the images in Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season? Or would it be better to put it in this sub-category Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season satellite images? --Kanashimi (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read my text, all those images go into the sub-directories of Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season for the system they are related to (e.g. photos for Colin go into the sub-directory Category:Tropical Storm Colin (2022) for instance). For the Invests, they go into Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season until they are assigned to a named system or into Category:2022 Atlantic non-developing invests if they never develop. Pierre cb (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The code has been modified. Please report back if you find any problems. Kanashimi (talk) 20:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Pierre cb (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WPAC outdate again?

Hi I've notice that Cewbot did not upload satellite image. HurricaneEdgar 05:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneEdgar Does this problem continue to occur? Kanashimi (talk) 07:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are continue (as of now) HurricaneEdgar 07:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think File:2022 NRL WP112022 TOKAGE infrared-gray satellite.png, File:2022 NRL WP102022 MA-ON infrared-gray satellite.png is what you want, right? Kanashimi (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Village pump/topic list

hi! i suggest removing the {{Clear}}, and on Commons:Village pump/Header move this above {|class="floatright" width="35%" , so that there is less white space on VP. what do you think? RZuo (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do a test edit? Kanashimi (talk) 09:55, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

like now. RZuo (talk) 10:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kanashimi (talk) 10:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i experimented a bit more. reducing the title maxwidth from 24em to 22em will let a horizontal VP image float side by side with the table. RZuo (talk) 12:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done You may modify User:Cewbot/log/20170915/configuration yourself. Please consider whether users with different screen widths and cell phone users will have a better experience. Kanashimi (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muifa (OutUpdate)

Hi I noticed that Muifa sattelite imagery is not update can you fix it? thank you HurricaneEdgar 03:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this right? Don't know why, it seems MUIFA sometimes not shown in https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/TC.html Kanashimi (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BOT (Update)

Hi Kanashimi :) The Bot did not upload on the satelite imagery, can you fix it thanks. HurricaneEdgar 01:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the NRL list is still incomplete on Toolforge. I had to manually update the machine from other area. Kanashimi (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PD-old files from tistory dont need review

e.g. File:Hyewon-yeondangui.yeoin.jpg. can you please revert these additions by your bot? RZuo (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean to roll back all the actions of the robot request? If this is an unreasonable operation, maybe we could invite User:Minorax to talk about the idea? Kanashimi (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to not require a review, only 22 files with LR and from tistory. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TOC whitespace problem

see com:vp. clicking your toc doesnt jump to sections. it seems links with whitespaces dont work. need to replace them with underscores. RZuo (talk) 11:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the report. I have modified the program and should update it recently. Kanashimi (talk) 13:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problem of Cewbot

Hi. The bot might be broken due to longevity of Cyclone Freddy as it kept updating the file File:2023 JTWC 11S IR satellite imagery.jpg on 9th February but not 9th March. A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 JTWC 11S IR satellite imagery.11S 100000MARsair.jpg exists. Kanashimi (talk) 09:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove redundant licencereview template added by your bot

i'm here once again. please remove these redundant templates https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mariamne_Leaving_the_Judgment_Seat_of_Herod.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=610210573 added by your bot to pd-old files. RZuo (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but Minorax is actually the one who is more familiar with this task. So perhaps it would be better if you discussed this with him first before requesting a robot task. And I suggest you use Commons:Bots/Work requests. It would also help me to understand what you want to do if you could specify more clearly, for example by making a page list and asking for eliminating all the {{LicenseReview}}s. Thank you. Kanashimi (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images for Tropical Storm Bret

Hello!

Cewbot appears to not be uploading any photos or forecasts for Tropical Storm Bret. AtlanticHurr (talk) 03:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I restarted the robot. Kanashimi (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank you! AtlanticHurr (talk) 07:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Kenneth

Hello! Just wanted to note that Cewbot has not uploaded any images nor forecast map for TS Kenneth. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I restart the bot. Kanashimi (talk) 11:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Hello, I noticed that Cewbot is no longer updating the topic lists for the community pages. Can you help fix this? Clay (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Please report back if there are any problems. Kanashimi (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cewbot

Hello, I noticed that Cewbot is no longer updating the topic lists for the community pages. Can you help fix this? Clay (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Please report back if there are any problems. Kanashimi (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories of tropical cyclone seasons

Could your Cewbot stop inputting wrong or inexistent categories for tropical cyclones. For instance, you have inputted Category:2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season for satellite images of Category:Cyclone Djoungou from 2023-24 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season. In other cases, you have inputted a non-existent Category:2023-24 Southern Hemisphere typhoon season as there is no such thing as a Typhoon in south Pacific and all images sent there where from different sub-categories of Category:2023-24 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season.

Please input the correct sub-category the most related to your uploaded satellite images, not a random category!

Pierre cb (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will change the method of detecting the categories. Please let me know if it is still incorrect. Kanashimi (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 JTWC WTXS21 IR satellite imagery.90S.jpg

You bot is uploading images of tropical cyclones with bad names. If you follow the history of uploads of this files for instances, it was used in February for a satellite image of Category:Cyclone Djoungou but it is updated now with the photo of a totally different tropical system (Tropical Depression 8). It tried to comes back to the original but your bot overwritten it. I reloaded the original as an independent file. Could you avoid that in the future?

Pierre cb (talk) 13:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pierre cb That's kind of weird. So Filipo and Djoungou both use the WTXS21? Or which one should WTXS21 stand for? Kanashimi (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have no idea. Ask the JTWC. Pierre cb (talk) 04:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I basically named the files according to the information registered on the JTWC website. The latest number on the website is now WTXS22, so I think it won't touch WTXS21. Kanashimi (talk) 05:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong names of images

Please correct another time your Cewbot image names. It keeps doing wrong naming and/or categorization. For instance uploading new version of images over a totally different systems (e.g. File:2024 JTWC WTXS21 IR satellite imagery.95S.jpg), giving non-existant categories (e.g. "Category:2023-24 Southern Hemisphere typhoon season" as there is no such thing) or using wrong categories "Category:2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season" when it is obvious that it is Category:2023-24 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season). I kept reporting these errors and nothing change.

Pierre cb (talk) 03:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

95S: I don't see any 95S alerts right now. I guess maybe JTWC uses the same number on different tropical cyclones?
"Category:2023-24 Southern Hemisphere typhoon season": Sorry I forgot to update the code, I just did.
"Category:2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season": Sorry, can you give me a file case?

Kanashimi (talk) 12:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2024_CIMSS_20S_Twenty_visible_infrared_satellite_loop.gif&action=history Pierre cb (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I re-ran the program, and now the image is categorized into Category:2023-24 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season. The robots are basically categorized according to the information on the CIMSS web page. I'm curious if CIMSS changes the location information with the location of the tropical cyclone. Kanashimi (talk) 00:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessing old forecast cone images

Do you know how I can anchor a file used on Wikipedia to a specific version. I am most interested in the current version of Hurricane Makani's cone for its article on the English Wikipedia. Thanks, ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 23:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quxyz (talk • contribs) 23:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like this? Kanashimi (talk) 00:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure if that'd work because I don't think you can create images with links in Wikipedia. My issue looks to be moot anyways as the JTWC hasn't issued another advisory since 25 April. ✶Qux yz ✶ 22:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another way is to upload this version separately. Kanashimi (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of "Twenty-three"

Hello, I have noticed that Cewbot has uploaded a satellite loop named "File:2024 CIMSS 23S Twentythre visible infrared satellite loop.gif". The spelling of "twenty-three" is wrong, and I have moved it to the correct filename "File:2024 CIMSS 23S Twentythree visible infrared satellite loop.gif". It would be great if it could be corrected in the future. Thank you! 2003 LN 6 01:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I basically named it after the name CIMSS gave me. The name is not generated by the robot itself... Kanashimi (talk) 03:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Kanashimi/Archive 1

Tip: Categorizing images

Cewbot not really helpful

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Cleanup of Photos from Panoramio needing categories

Earthquake intensity maps

Notification about possible deletion

Sorry

A barnstar for you!

JTWC forecast map name

Cewbot is not detecting edits by bots?

Important message for file movers

Notification about possible deletion

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

JTWC warning graphics for the Southern Hemisphere?

Descriptions not updating?

JTWC

JTWC and NHC Warning

File:2021 CIMSS 02L Bill visible infrared satellite loop.gif and File:2021 CIMSS 02L Two visible infrared satellite loop.gif

JTWC Warning ?

Geostationary VIS-IR

Cyclone 03B

Cewbot

Tropical Cyclone AUS SWIO SPAC

Your bot adding {{LicenseReview}} to tistory.com files

Cewbot

Cewbot LicenseReview error

Image

Cewbot

need Update

bot did not upload

Cewbot

Cewbot

Cewbot

Topic list

Cewbot

Category:2022 Atlantic hurricane season satellite images

WPAC outdate again?

Commons:Village pump/topic list

Muifa (OutUpdate)

BOT (Update)

PD-old files from tistory dont need review

TOC whitespace problem

Problem of Cewbot

Remove redundant licencereview template added by your bot

Images for Tropical Storm Bret

Tropical Storm Kenneth

Cewbot

Cewbot

Categories of tropical cyclone seasons

File:2024 JTWC WTXS21 IR satellite imagery.90S.jpg

Wrong names of images

Accessing old forecast cone images

Spelling of "Twenty-three"

Navigation menu

Search