User talk:Kadellar/2013

2013

Commons Picture of the Day

Hi Kadellar,

I work for the Upper Deck Co. As the Photo Manager and we would like to use your image of Lucas Nogueira on one of our trading cards and also would like to inquire if you might have more images of him. We are willing to pay licensing fees to you. Please email me back as soon as possible.

john_ibriks@upperdeck.com

Your help is appreciated.

Sincerely, John

Hi Kadellar,

My name is Jawad Qadir and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Foundation blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/

Given that your photo is scheduled for 27 January 2013, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. If you're interested, please email me at jqadir@wikimedia.org.

Thanks, Jqadir (WMF) (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysler Building - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Debod - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could be better but OK. --King of Hearts 01:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Murillo y Puerta de Murillo del Museo del Prado - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Capricho - Jardín Artístico de la Alameda de Osuna - 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iste Praetor 19:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Capricho - Jardín Artístico de la Alameda de Osuna - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --A.Savin 17:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gogol Bordello - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Hot Chili Peppers - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! James LaBrie - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Hot Chili Peppers - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Does this band ever wear shirts? --Mattbuck 10:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln Memorial - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Álvaro de Bazán - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gogol Bordello - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gogol Bordello - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El último vagón - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems ok to me, though would have been nicer a bit sharper. --Mattbuck 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks. New version uploaded anyway, it's straight now. --Kadellar 23:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eva Cebrián - Goya 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière du Père-Lachaise - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presentación Premios Goya 2013 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --MB-one 21:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Eiffel, École militaire, Champ-de-Mars, Palais de Chaillot, La Défense - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enrique González Macho - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be cropped on the left but QI anyway. --JLPC 10:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enrique González Macho - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente del Ángel Caído - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segovia - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 20:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento Cuartel de la Montaña - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de Vacas - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 22:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Alfonso XII de España en los Jardines del Retiro - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M Clan - 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise --The Photographer 17:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Where especially? I've seen loooots of landscapes with much more noise than this concert shot. --Kadellar 22:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)  weak support Noise is almost OK, I think you can improve noise in the dark areas via software. --Tuxyso 07:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Your computer screen must be more lightful than mine, I only see black; but I'll have a try. --Kadellar 13:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC) OK to me. Mattbuck 08:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks, Mattbuck. Anyway, I've just applied a little bit of NR and I've corrected CA I hadn't seen. --Kadellar 11:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreón de Lozoya, Casa de Bornos, Casa de Solier, monumento a Juan Bravo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a Juan Bravo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, (despite the two strange clothing accessories!) --JLPC 18:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreón de Lozoya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segovia - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isabel Pantoja - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Carl English y Zoran Dragić.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice scene with good quality --Indeedous 20:38, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manel Comas - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Tariq Kirksay - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 21:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Carl English y Fran Vázquez - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of noise but QI level --Poco a poco 16:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Daniel Clark y Luka Žorić - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --~Pyb 20:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homenaje a Carlos Jiménez - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus a bit off but acceptable. --Mattbuck 01:22, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Fran Vázquez, Germán Gabriel, Sergi Vidal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Carl English y Zoran Dragić.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Carl English y Zoran Dragić.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Carl English y Txemi Urtasun - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Tariq Kirksay y Txemi Urtasun - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, but forgivable. --Mattbuck 22:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenio Cañada - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manel Comas, Arsenio Cañada, Juanma Iturriaga - Liga ACB - TVE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The guy on the right doesn't look very happy to be there. --Mattbuck 22:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Hahaha actually he's listening to the earphones, they can't hardly hear each other (I couldn't). They make interesting comments, but first they must listen! He's a great guy! Thanks for all your reviews! --Kadellar 22:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendo - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise --The Photographer 18:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC) It is not. See his hair. It is a concert, not a landscape. --Kadellar 19:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Noise seems acceptable for me. QI --PierreSelim 15:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Lamont Barnes y Fran Vázquez - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Fran Vázquez y Lamont Barnes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynx lynx - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neophron percnopterus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus ruber - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 19:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynx lynx - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dof problem but face is focused. I'm no biologist, but I think q requires a more specific category of subspecies. Remember add geotag. Well done --The Photographer 04:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC) As I've seen, Lynx lynx is enough. I don't think the geotag is interesting here, maybe in the wild it would. Thanks for reviewing. --Kadellar 18:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Concesionario de Mercedes-Benz, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-03-30, DD 21.JPG

Hola Kadellar, me preguntas en QIC por qué no he nominado la imagen como FPC. El caso es que no he nominado esa, pero una de la misma colección, de momento, con éxito. Creo que el logo no juega un papel primordial en la imagen (tampoco en la que has promovido). Muchas imágenes de vehículos serían más problemáticas que estas imágenes. Te mando un saludo, Poco a poco (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Acabo de corregir el CA, gracias por el aviso. No te entendí cuando trataste de darme a entender que la QIC era mejor FPC que la actual. Lo curioso es que en nada la imagen ha conseguido 13 votos a favor y en QIC no la promueve nadie :) A mí la FPC me gusta más porque la parte derecha está cortada, lo que le da a la imagen un toque más abstracto. De hecho, estoy pensando en nominar algún día también esta otra (quizás cortando la parte superior con el nombre de empresa), ¿qué opinas? un saludo y gracias por las felicitaciones! Poco a poco (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Creo que tienes razón sobre el problema de granulado de la imagen. No se debe al efecto que tantas veces comentó Iifar (ese se debió a un abuso de la elminación de ruido que hice durante un buen tiempo). No te sabría explicar porqué en este caso la calidad no es la esperada. Esta otra, por ejemplo, tiene mejor calidad, aunque tengo que trabajar la perspectiva con tiempo antes de nominarla.

Con respecto a tus FPCs, la del alimoche me convenció por la calidad de la imagen y porque es un animal que no se ve a menudo, me encanta su peinado :). La imagen del flamenco no tiene tanta calidad y su postura no me llama la atención. Un saludo! Poco a poco (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Respecto al lince, la composición está bien y la expresión del animal es intersante (si bien, yo hubiera intentado incluir también la oreja), y sobre todo la definición del ojo, que fue lo que me motivó a aprobarla en QI. Desde el punto de vista de FPC, tengo las mismas dudas que tú, un f/5,6 es algo justito, podría haberse sacado más partido de la imagen, y como te comentaba hubiera intentado sacar la oreja, pero si yo fuera tú, lo intentaría. Yo también acabo de iniciar una FPC a modo de sondeo, sin verlo del todo claro. Saludos, Poco a poco (talk) 07:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Luka Žorić y Germán Gabriel - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice face. --Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neophron percnopterus - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me --Hockei 17:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus ruber - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 21:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavo cristatus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 06:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Vías de tren Fuencarral-Chamartín.jpg

Category:Railway lines in Spain is a subcategory of Category:Rail transport infrastructure in Spain, which is a subcategory of Category:Rail transport in Spain, therefore, include File:Vías de tren Fuencarral-Chamartín.jpg while in the first and last is redundant and does not meet the standards of Wikimedia.--JT Curses (talk) 15:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

He visto en tu página que hablas español. También Category:Estación de Chamartín es una subcategoría, varios niveles más abajo, de Category:Rail transport in Spain, por lo que la redundancia era doble. Un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenicopterus ruber - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. --Christian Ferrer 14:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos - Zoo de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and quality picture. --Christian Ferrer 14:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Neophron percnopterus - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neophron percnopterus - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Jayson Granger - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Josh Fisher - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos - Zoo de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dromaius novaehollandiae - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pica pica - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Lmbuga 20:38, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pica pica - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Germán Gabriel, Andy Panko, Luka Žorić - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise level just ok --Poco a poco 20:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Earl Calloway - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of noise, but good quality--Lmbuga 19:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - Edgar Vicedo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a la hispanidad - Museo de América - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estudiantes vs Unicaja Málaga - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dromaius novaehollandiae - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 07:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murallas de Ávila - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:42, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speothos venaticus - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Jastrow 16:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pecari tajacu - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lynx lynx - 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lynx lynx - 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M Clan - 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eva Hache.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope.--Jebulon (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctictis binturong - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cuteish. --Mattbuck 12:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Steindy 18:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murallas de Ávila - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 18:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Isabey Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CN, but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 17:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Bosque del Recuerdo - 01.jpg

Hola Kadellar, la última version del archivo es, sin duda, mejor que la anterior. Pero los problemas con el cielo, y en especial con el cielo combinado con algunos elementos en un plano anterior (ramas y demás) siguen ahí, y no les veo solución. Como también te comenté creo que la nitidez es algo limitada, quizás un f/4 no fuera lo más apropiado para esta escena. Vamos, que no EMO no es QI, y no veo que pueda serlo, lo siento. Un saludo! Poco a poco (talk) 08:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speothos venaticus - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see only fur and grass, but very sharp and good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Hahaha It is taken exactly from above (is there a category for that??). I read the species name at the info plate ;) --Kadellar 20:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gyps fulvus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very nice --A.Savin 16:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptoptilos crumeniferus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot! --NorbertNagel 20:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptoptilos crumeniferus - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elaphurus davidianus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ciconia ciconia - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ciconia ciconia - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bison bison - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Lmbuga 14:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bison bison - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 13:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gyps fulvus - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gyps fulvus - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Samoa vs Holanda - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Nazionale di rugby a 15 dell'Italia - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Segovia - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Segovia - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot. --Steindy 22:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 08:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Italy women's national rugby union team.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 56.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 56.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 21:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM + EOS 1D Mk IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spain men's national handball team 2013-2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good, but it will change every year. I propose to add to the scope the year or season.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, good idea. For this one, I'd choose Spain men's national handball team 2013-2014, because this was the first match with the new coach and people in the picture are not all the same as in the World Championship held last January. --Kadellar (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. -- Hispalois (talk) 04:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spain women's national handball team in 2013.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good, but it will change every year. I propose to add to the scope the year or season. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, good idea. Added! ;) --Kadellar (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. --Hispalois (talk) 05:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - Selección femenina de España - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. To me 1200 ISO is appropriate here. --Cayambe 08:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autographa gamma en Trachelospermum jasminoides - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Knin (grb).gif

Eleassar (t/p) 07:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality with regard to shooting conditions. But I would crop the small part of the head at the left out. --Tuxyso 07:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I didn't see that face, I'll rework. --Kadellar 09:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Selección de España - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I had prefered a non-cropped head, but for a profile shot it's OK. Technically quality is quite good. --Tuxyso 07:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Don't understand your logic, this girl is not looking at the camera either Poco a poco 22:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC) That is a profile shot, showing her in a wider context. The other photo is a frontal portrayal where the photographed person does not look into the camera. --Tuxyso 11:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Selección de España - 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Selección de España - 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autographa gamma en Trachelospermum jasminoides - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 19:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Selección de España - 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasius niger y Cinara tujafilina en Thuja orientalis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - Selección masculina de España - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hell's Fire - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose halo surrounding the head, sorry. And too tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 01:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)  Done No halo now. --Kadellar 13:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC) QI for me--Lmbuga 19:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI for me, but see note. I love the image, very good in spite of...--Lmbuga 01:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Improvable. Please... improve it --Lmbuga 01:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Not sure how to improve that. The grey background is actually a blue sky, but it doesn't fit at all with the guitarist, so I changed it; that's where the little halo might come from. --Kadellar 12:57, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyenda involuntaria - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The forehead of the person is blown out--Lmbuga 01:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC) New review, and I don't have problem with the forehead. Nice picture and nice forhead IMO. QI for me if you improve the noise and the CA over the forehead--Lmbuga 10:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)  Done now. --Kadellar 13:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Nice perspective and good IMO (the overexposed forehead is expressive, I think--Lmbuga 18:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crisix - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 01:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Selección de España - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please paint out the head in the bottom left? Mattbuck 21:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC) Yes, done now. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 18:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC Ok for the conditions. Mattbuck 22:11, 2 July 2013 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manuel Ángel Fernández Mateo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - Selección masculina de España - 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - Selección masculina de España - 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

POTD INTERVIEW

Hi Kadellar,

My name is Michael Guss and I'm a communications volunteer with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. As you are familiar with, we have a feature on the Wikimedia blog [2] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on Wikimedia Commons. Given that one of your photos, Neophron Percnopterus , is scheduled for 25 July 2013, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by email to discuss your photography and your POTD. Please let me know if you would be interested! You can email me mgusswikimedia.org or respond on my talk page.

Thanks,

Michael MGuss (WMF) (talk) 17:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

your photo in new Commons brochure

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that a photo of yours is in the new Commons welcome brochure (as part of a screenshot of the main page). Thanks for contributing that great shot!--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sôber y Carlitos - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hora Zulú - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not the best detail, but correct focus, OK for QI --A.Savin 17:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XXL - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. Vassil 14:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XXL - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very good expression. Vassil 14:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. Vassil 14:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb. --Smial 15:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bebe - MN Gredos - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bebe - MN Gredos - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive. Perhaps FP? --Smial 13:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the reviews! I'd be so happy to get a concert FP... --Kadellar 13:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M Clan (2013) - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just above 2 Mpx, just ok. -- Smial 21:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sôber - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M Clan (2013) - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but why such an ultra-low resolution? Down-scaled due to NR? --Tuxyso 20:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Yes, I downscaled them, maybe a bit too much. Commons users and noise don't get on very well, and it was unavoidable here. Thanks for the review. --Kadellar 09:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC) IMHO noise with such shooting conditions is inevitable. It had not been a problem for me in this case. --Tuxyso 14:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment I can follow the decision to scale down, as in the past repeatedly stage photos were declined because of some noise. Sometimes one is forced to use ISO3200 or even more to get a reasonably sharp shot, no current camera is free of noise then. -- Smial 13:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M Clan (2013) - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, I like it -- Achim Raschka 04:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, I like it -- Achim Raschka 04:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 16:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crisix - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 21:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verónica Cuadrado, Elisabeth Chávez - Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressiv photo and good quality. -- Spurzem 20:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Diego Kravetz-edit.jpg

Hola trate de arreglar la imagen, que te parece ahora? Saludos!!! --Ezarateesteban 22:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

El usuario JBarta del taller gráfico tuvo la gentileza de retocar y subir otra versión de la imágen. Saludos!!!! Ezarateesteban 22:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sôber - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 09:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sôber - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very noisy, but I think it's ok. --Mattbuck 09:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jorge Dueñas - Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive photo and good quality. -- Spurzem 20:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vendetta Fucking Metal - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hell's Fire - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verónica Cuadrado, Eli Pinedo, Patricia Elorza - Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verónica Cuadrado - Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Smial 21:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! XXL - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - QI for me -- Achim Raschka 06:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torneo de clasificación WRWC 2014 - Italia vs España - 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd probably crop a bit off the bottom, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gyps fulvus - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roger Glover.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. VT98Fan (talk) 19:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyenda involuntaria - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lasius niger y Cinara tujafilina en Thuja orientalis.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lasius niger y Cinara tujafilina en Thuja orientalis.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buitrago del Lozoya - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buitrago del Lozoya - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 11:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysler Building - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynx lynx - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the image although there are some technical flaws. Please ad to the description the nature of the black dots on the right (dirt?) --Moroder 10:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Yes, it was dirt. Longer description now (Is "dots" ok?). --Kadellar 16:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Gracias muchas --Moroder 07:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buitrago del Lozoya - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 08:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Autographa gamma en Trachelospermum jasminoides - 01.jpg

Please revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 17:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syncerus caffer nanus - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María del Castillo - Buitrago del Lozoya - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I agree w Lmbuga. --Slaunger 12:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)  Done better now. --Kadellar 16:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crisix - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Strange but powerful composition, I love it. Sharp and good quality IMO--Lmbuga 14:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del reloj de Buitrago del Lozoya - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --ArildV 09:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla de Buitrago del Lozoya - 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diego Simeone - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Autographa gamma en Trachelospermum jasminoides - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autographa gamma en Trachelospermum jasminoides - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diego Simeone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful portrait. --JLPC (talk) 12:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Minimalism

Hi Carlos,

It's good to know that someone in our community shares our interest in simple subjects and compositions! However, I very much doubt that our partner reviewers and photographs find any interest (educational, artistic or otherwise) in images like this one or this one. Your example, on the contrary, has more chances of being appreciated due to the richer patterns shown. A pity that image equality is not perfect (which is a must in our cruzade for minimalism!). As for finding a suitable category for our artsy attempts I'm afraid Commons is not the right place. Any ideas? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

• I have created a gallery with the photos of my own which I consider more or less minimalist: User:Alvesgaspar/minimalism. Only one of them is a FP... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Toledo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 23:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Alcalá - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla de Buitrago del Lozoya - 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christian Fernández Salas - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent! --Ralf Roletschek 11:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David Villa - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Blue Elf 13:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente del Arrabal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla de Buitrago del Lozoya - 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toni García - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Ralf Roletschek 11:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla de Buitrago del Lozoya - 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla de Buitrago del Lozoya - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla de Buitrago del Lozoya - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good IMO--Lmbuga 17:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of San Servando, Southwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : could you please add "SE view" to the scope, as we usually do here. Thanks. --JLPC (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Done Scope updated. --Kadellar (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support : OK now. Useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Toledo - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Muy bien. Sin novedad en el Alcazar, mi general.--Jebulon 13:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María del Castillo - Buitrago del Lozoya - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María del Castillo - Buitrago del Lozoya - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María del Castillo - Buitrago del Lozoya - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de san Martín - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice view --A.Savin 13:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de las Santas Justa y Rufina - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:38, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Toledo - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 16:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de san Servando - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 16:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Ildefonso - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great. --ArildV 16:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposal for a new mailing list : photoreporter

Hello,

I've launched a proposal to create a mailing list for photographers who cover sports, festivals... meta:Talk:Mailing_lists#Proposal_for_a_new_mailing_list_:_photoreporter Pyb (talk) 18:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buitrago del Lozoya - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toledo - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szent István-bazilika - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --ArildV 10:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Toledo - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, ok quality (a bit soft inmo).--ArildV 06:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de El Parral - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 13:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:10, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Santa María del Castillo, Buitrago del Lozoya, Northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice. --JLPC (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto de Segovia - 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 12:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segovia - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Juan Bravo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 17:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Alcalá - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better, QI --Poco a poco 19:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

QIC Truck Stop

Hi Kadellar,
thanks for taking the time and your voting at the pic of the country musician at QIC taken by me and nominated by Frank - as a beginner in concert photography these kinds of comments are very valuable for me, especially coming from a guy used to work at this area too. I just uploaded a less processed version and hope the clipped whites are gone or even tolerable. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 20:51, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Kruszwica kolegiata śś. Piotra i Pawła(WLZ13).JPG

I corrected this image by your comment here. 1bumer (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Buitrago del Lozoya - 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buitrago del Lozoya - 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Segovia - 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Magdalena a los pies de Cristo en el convite de Simón - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Segovia - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Esteban de Segovia - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:48, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Berthold Werner 12:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, QI for me -- Moroder 13:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, QI for me -- Moroder 13:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Toledo - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main altar of the Cathedral of Segovia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:21, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 17:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - good lighting effect on the keyboard -- Achim Raschka 05:53, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Millán - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Segovia - 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Segovia - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:George Vince's Cross.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:George Vince's Cross.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Throne of the Alcázar of Segovia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

El truco del parque

¡En realidad me estás sobrevalorando!. No conozco el truco del parque. La posición de la cámara sólo tiene su origen en que es casi el único sitio desde que se ve la fachada al atardecer y desde el que no se ven las horribles grúas que la rodean. :)

Saludos. Barcex (talk) 17:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Mayor de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The dark areas are underexposed. --P e z i 18:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC) I don't understand this review either. Are they dark areas or underexposed bright areas? The space behind the columns lies in complete shadow, this is quite early in the morning, that space is dark also in the flesh. Brightening that would make losing a lot of contrast. --Kadellar 19:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Comment uploaded to show what I mean. If you don't like please revert --P e z i 20:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC) OK, I see what you mean, but I prefer the first version. There were hard shadows at that time in the morning. --Kadellar 20:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Support OK, I now understand what you mean --P e z i 20:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de san Martín - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Alcalá - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments burnt out lights; building in the upper left is producing a "ghost" --P e z i 18:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC) I don't understand your review. I can't delete the building and lights are usually burnt, because they are lights. --Kadellar 19:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Comment uploaded to show what I mean. If you don't like please revert --P e z i 20:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC) I didn't like your version, I think the gate was overexposed. It's better to keep the building in shadow so it's not disturbing. I hadn't even seen it. --Kadellar 20:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Support OK, I now understand what you mean --P e z i 20:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segovia - UNESCO - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Segovia - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (and high historical value)--Jebulon 08:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GP Camión de España 2013 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GP Camión de España 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 00:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maikel Melero - Exhibición Freestyle GP Camión de España 2013 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yeah! For shure also FP ;-) --Smial 22:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Szent István-bazilika - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Szent István-bazilika - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maikel Melero - Exhibición Freestyle GP Camión de España 2013 - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maikel Melero - Exhibición Freestyle GP Camión de España 2013 - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 09:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

für dich :-)

Schöne Grüße aus Vorarlberg --Böhringer (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really cool pic, and QI for me -- Achim Raschka 19:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctem - Asaco Metal Fest 2013 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Selection WikiCon

(da du deutsch lesen kannst, ausnahmsweise mal auf deutsch)

Hi Kadellar,
in den nächsten Tagen werde ich eine Zusammenstellung von Bildern auf commons machen, die bei der diesjährigen WikiCon in Karlsruhe gezeigt werden sollen - ich habe dabei auch bereits ein paar deiner Bilder ergänzt. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du mir hilfst: Ist es dir möglich, einen Satz sehr guter Bilder aus dem letzten Jahr +/- bsp. deiner Sport und Konzertbilder (gern auch aus anderen Bereichen - Ausnahme WLM Deutschland, da dort eine eigene Show geplant ist) in die Category:Selection WikiCon 2013 zu ergänzen. Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tobermory Main Street 2012-08-09.jpg

Thank-you for reviewing this picture. Following your comments, I've reworked the image to restore detail in the trees. Could you please have another look? Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huelga educativa 24-O - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deep Purple - MN Gredos - 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I wish you a very very happy and prosperous Diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huelga educativa 24-O - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.No apologies necessary. Great shot. --Smial 08:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nero and Agrippina (Aphrodisias Archaeological Museum, Turkey).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : Useful (I've linked the scope to a category, as it is required by VIC rules. Hope you'll agree. Friendly.) --JLPC (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
...but you link to the museum...--Jebulon (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Well, it's ok for me. It's the only sculpture of Nero and Agrippina there. I wanted the scope to be wider but probably this way is better in case we need another hypothetical similar scope. --Kadellar (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

No no, sorry for the misunderstanding. I think the scope is good, but not the link. As for me, the best is :Nero and Agrippina, (Aphrodisias Archaeological Museum, Turkey).--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar de Segovia - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Diego Simeone - 01.jpg

File:Diego Simeone - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ggenellina (talk) 06:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Athabasca

Athabasca has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--117Avenue (talk) 05:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Kadellar, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

POTD

Congratulations for this wonderful Picture of the Day, I'm stil astonished !--Jebulon (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much once again! :D --Kadellar (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 15:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anacridium aegyptium - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty guy :) --Poco a poco 20:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Kadellar, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anacridium aegyptium - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anacridium aegyptium - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Info

[FYI http://www.zazzle.de/der_agyptischer_geierneophron_percnopterus_hülle-179994154920613135] Regards   • Richard • [®] • 16:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kadellar, I have a similar "problem". I wish you happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)