User talk:Josedm
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Ελληνικά | Esperanto | Español | Estremeñu | فارسی | Français | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | Latina | Lietuvių | 日本語 | 한국어 | Magyar | Македонски | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Scots | Shqip | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / Srpski | Suomi | Svenska | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/- |
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
File:Nico eternidad.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
-Túrelio (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:Nicole Natalino Torres.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Nicole Natalino Torres.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Nicole Natalino Torres.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Trixt (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Gabriela Villalba.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Gabriela Villalba.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gabriela Villalba.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—Ed 17 (Talk) 16:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Nico sere.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Martin H. (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:Narea Tapia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nicole_Natalino1.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nicole_Natalino1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nicole_Natalino1.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 12:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Patty boyd1.jpg is uncategorized since 23 June 2009.
- Image:Nicole natalino hit 40.jpg is uncategorized since 25 June 2009.
- Image:Copyoforiginal.jpg is uncategorized since 11 July 2009.
- Image:Tal vez.jpg is uncategorized since 12 July 2009.
- Image:Ringo barbara wedsm.jpg is uncategorized since 18 July 2009.
- Image:Narea logo.png is uncategorized since 18 July 2009.
- Image:Logo-sodastereo.jpg is uncategorized since 19 July 2009.
- Image:Nicole Na..2.jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2009.
- Image:Nicole Na...jpg was uncategorized on 22 August 2009.
- Image:Jorge gonzález disco de oro corazoNes.jpg was uncategorized on 1 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Stella McCartney adidas 2009 .jpg was uncategorized on 31 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kudai Making Off 2008.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Miguel Tapia con un fanático en avión.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Miguel Tapia.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Benito Cerati.jpg was uncategorized on 9 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging Image:Nico making nhmas.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Nico making nhmas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Nico making nhmas.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Okki (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Not sure what you wanted to do with that page, but I added a speedy delete tag because there's no content. :-) Killiondude (talk) 03:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Nico logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Taichi (talk) 09:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Esta imagen podrá ser borrada.
|
Gracias por haber subido Image:Nicole natalino hit 40.jpg. A esta imagen le falta información sobre su licencia. Se ofrece un origen pero no existe comprobación que el autor o propietario de derechos de autor esté de acuerdo con la licencia atribuida. Por favor proporciona un enlace a una página web que contenga datos sobre la licencia o envía un e-mail con una copia del permiso a OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
A menos que se obtenga esta información, la imagen será borrada después de siete días. Gracias.
|
Taichi (talk) 09:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Photo inedit beatles.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Pymouss Tchatcher - 10:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Ringo barbara wedsm.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Pymouss Tchatcher - 11:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nico_making_nhmas.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nico_making_nhmas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nico_making_nhmas.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin H. (talk) 02:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Copyoforiginal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 02:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Permission must come from the heirs of John Lennon. Unlikely. --Martin H. (talk) 02:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Logo-sodastereo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Alakasam (talk) 23:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Nico making nhmas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Alakasam (talk) 23:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Tal vez.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Alakasam (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Narea logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Alakasam (talk) 23:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Babsrica3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Alakasam (talk) 23:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
File:John lennon and may pang 1974.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 04:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Los prisioneros
[edit]Lo siento, no es aceptable dicha imagen para este sitio debido a restricciones de derechos de autor. no todo el material en flickr se puede añadir aquí. -- Drini 14:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Files you uploaded may be deleted
[edit]The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commonswikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 04:56, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Re:Responda por favor
[edit]Lo siento, pero el sitio del primer enlace tiene una licencia {{By-nc-sa-2.5}}, lo que significa que no permite el uso comercial, requisito imprescindible en el material que se suba a WikimediaCommons, puedes leerlo en Commons:Sobre las licencias y el segundo enlace prohíbe expresamente la reproducción o copia de los contenidos de este sitio sin el expreso consentimiento de Consorcio Periodístico de Chile S.A.. Puedes intentar solicitar el permiso, en Commons:Modelos de mensajes tienes las instrucciones para hacerlo con textos modelo para enviar. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Re:Ayúdame
[edit]Si tienes el e-mail del dueño de la foto (el poseedor del copyright) él te habrá dicho, en ese correo, cómo quiere licenciarla, sino es así vuelve a escribirle utilizando una de estas solicitudes de permiso y cuando recibas su respuesta envía copia del permiso a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Tras esto deberás esperar a que los miembros de OTRS verifiquen el e-mail y te respondan. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Esa licencia no está permitida aquí, lo siento. Lee esta sección Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Beatles_crossing_Abbey_Road_by_Ian_McMillan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dockino (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Re:File:Stella_McCartney_adidas_2009_.jpg
[edit]Hola Josedm, la imagen ya ha sido verificada y corresponde con la licencia puesta. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Los prisioneros en vivo año 1986.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Hello, Josedm. You have new messages at Hoangquan hientrang's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Narea & Tapia Cumbre de Rock Chileno II.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Narea & Tapia Cumbre de Rock Chileno II.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Narea & Tapia Cumbre de Rock Chileno II.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Mathonius (talk) 03:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Cecilia Amenábar.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cecilia Amenábar.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Cecilia Amenábar.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Lymantria (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Respuesta
[edit]Es mejor que le hagas la consulta a User talk:Cookie que es administradora. Nicolás Pérez (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Cecilia Amenábar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Re:Rata.cl
[edit]Hola Josedm, disculpa por no responderte, no había visto tu último mensaje. Para solicitar un permiso sigue las instrucciones de Commons:Modelos de mensajes. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- La licencia la tienes que comprobar tú y aportar la fuente donde se pueda verificar. Según la dirección que has dado como fuente la imagen procede de una página que dice: Se prohíbe expresamente la reproducción o copia de los contenidos de este sitio sin el expreso consentimiento del Grupo Copesa, por lo tanto no deberías haberla subido, es una violación de copyright que he tenido que borrar. Por favor, asegúrate de que las imágenes son libres antes de subirlas, lee Commons:Sobre las licencias. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Stella McCartney adidas 2009 .jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Lucy_In_The_Sky_With_Diamonds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Evil IP address (talk) 17:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Benito Cerati.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Quan (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Benito Cerati 2012.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Benito Cerati 2012.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jorge González Calama 1994.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jorge González Calama 1994.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jorge González Calama 1994.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ww2censor (talk) 10:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Flickr uploads
[edit]In your recent two Flickr uploads as a source you gave a link to a Flickr album link instead of a unique image url. Albums can sometimes be very big and the reviewing robot cannot find an image with such a link which means a human volunteer must review it. I was able to fix them but in future please provide the image page url as you will see from the edits I made for you. It just saves everyone time and effort. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 10:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Nicole Natalino - Hechas en Chile 2009-08-16 (3831783457 b3b229af75 o).jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Nicole Natalino - Hechas en Chile 2009-08-16 (3831785091 67a96212f1 o).jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Nicole Natalino - Hechas en Chile 2009-08-16 (3831787815 184d33bf27 o).jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Nicole Natalino - Hechas en Chile 2009-08-16 (3832581762 29afaeb1a8 o).jpg
[edit]
Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Los Prisioneros - Calama (Mayo 2003).jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Los Prisioneros - Calama (Mayo 2003).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Los Prisioneros - Calama (Mayo 2003).jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Elisfkc (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Los Prisioneros - Reencuentro.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Los Prisioneros - Reencuentro.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Los Prisioneros - Reencuentro.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Elisfkc (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Los Prisioneros - Gira Corazones - 1990 - Calama.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Los Prisioneros - Gira Corazones - 1990 - Calama.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Los Prisioneros - Gira Corazones - 1990 - Calama.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Nicole Natalino - Premios 40 Principales 2008.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Nicole Natalino - Premios 40 Principales 2008.jpg was recently deleted by Rubin16 for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/23069137@N00/2953948984 is licensed under cc-by-nc-sa-2.0
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Jennifer Lopez Shades of Blue 25-Sep-2016.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
Эlcobbola talk 18:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]Эlcobbola talk 18:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Los Prisioneros epoca La Cultura de la Basura.jpg
- File:Los Prisioneros Narea Gonzalez Tapia.jpg
Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Los Prisioneros - feria del disco 9 de octubre 2001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 18:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Los prisioneros logo los cuatro luchos.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Эlcobbola talk 18:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
I'm not multiple accounts
[edit]- Oppose - COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither are on offer here. Block was for File:Jennifer Lopez Shades of Blue 25-Sep-2016.jpg, an obvious case of Flickrwashing after uploader had received numerous warnings about Flickr issues (and, indeed, all users are responsible for the content they upload.) Block was not for the URAA issue images, the focus of the request; the request, however, indeed demonstrates that the user does not understand the issue(s), further supporting the block. If user had actually read the nomination, or COM:L which is linked to dozens of times here (!!!), they would have observed that works must be free in both the US and country of origin. Эlcobbola talk 18:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I found this photo of Jennifer Lopez, searching Flickr for images that could be reusable and modifiable. When I saw the license, I realized that I did not have the licenses to be allowed to use these photos from Flickr. Despite that, the image clearly says that it is in the public domain, when reviewing the license, this is Public Domain Mark 1.0, in which it is authorized to reuse the image and / or make modifications to it at will. What is the problem?
Despite that, the image clearly says that it is in the public domain, when reviewing the license, this is Public Domain Mark 1.0, in which it is authorized to reuse the image and / or make modifications to it at will. What is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josedm (talk • contribs) 18:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The problem is that you've not bothered to read or understand a word of what's been communicated in either my comment above or the numerous warnings you've received. No one who had even glanced at COM:LL would have made this statement.
- Reviewing admin should take note of Mari900 and the revised block rationale. Эlcobbola talk 01:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- We are not the same person. I am male, she is female. She is my friend. I asked her for her support with this, first, I do not manage English and secondly because she agrees with what I think. I asked for his support with this as I cannot speak as I have been blocked. They can investigate our IPs, all they want, we are not the same person. Josedm (talk)
I agree to diminish your block to original one week, but I'm afraid, that when unblocked, you start to upload copyright violations again and you will be blocked again. So for unblocking you must explain, why your uploads violated copyright and why files about John Lennon and Los Angeles Negros mentioned by you do not violate copyright. If you cannot explain the difference, then unfortunately you must remain blocked. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for barely responding. The truth is that this topic is not pleasant at all, and I was tired of how tense this has been. First of all, I am a wiki administrator, I have had to deal with multi-accounts, I am not one. I understand that the cobbola interpreted it that way, but the blocking seemed unfair, first for uploading a photo of Jennifer Lopez that I specified that I did not know the correct license of the photo but it said public domain, then I was going to fill out the form they ask to consult about licenses that he does not know what it is, he was in that when he blocked me and put the photos that I uploaded to be deleted according to the law in Argentina, without being able to defend myself, I turned to my friend who lives in Mexico (I am from Chile) to who could speak on my behalf. Besides, I don't speak English, she does. Now I am communicating through a translator. I can guarantee you that we are not the same person at all. I am not multiple accounts.
Returning to the main topic. I uploaded these photographs according to the fact that they were taken and / or published in Argentina, and there it clearly says that 25 years have passed. And those three were taken in Argentina, they do not have a license, it is not even known who took it.
- File:Concierto Amnistía en Estadio Mundialista, Mendoza, Argentina 14-10-1988.jpg
- File:Jorge González Chateau Rock Cordoba Argentina 1987.jpg
It seems to me nothing was infringed. When I mentioned the photos of Los Ángeles Negros as an example, it is because it is also an old photo and it says that the source that was published is an Argentine magazine and I say that it complies perfectly. Now these photos were published in Argetina and are more than 30 years old. elcobbola says that it should also be free in the United States but what if I didn't make it free in the USA. I already asked my friend to put that it is not in the public domain in the United States.
I really don't understand and I do want to be unlocked. I will avoid uploading photos, especially those that appear on Flickr and can be reused. If I want to upload a photo I will ask to upload it, because the truth is I don't understand anything. By the way there are other photos that I deleted and I had the permission of the author and / or owner. But that I want to talk about later. Josedm (talk)
- Today would be the day I would be unlocked, but because I felt that it was an unfair lock, and I asked a friend to represent me since the administrator Эlcobbola, put to delete several photos, some of them do not violate the labels copyright, so I needed to defend that. I understand that Эlcobbola interpreted it as me but Mari990 is not me, she is my girlfriend, we live at a distance, but we have been there for 6 years and she supported me in this, apart from supporting me with English that I do not handle very well. I am going to try to avoid uploading questionable photos, or I accept the original block that was given to me but I cannot accept the block that was given to me from multiple accounts since that is a false charge, which I understand that Эlcobbola believed but should have been given the task of investigate rather than immediately assuming it was another account of mine. I am an administrator of a wiki, and I am not going to say that I am faultless, but when I make a wrong or unfair block I try to amend it. I only ask that you not give me the multi-account blocking because I am not and I am willing to check it. --Josedm (talk) 08:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Hello. Almost a year ago I messaging you again more calmly, the reason I didn't before was because I got mad and didn't want to know more about this situation.
- I didn't know that uploading picture from magazines or argentinian sites published more than 20 years ago, was commiting an infraction in United States. I didn't have the intention of using pictures for Wikipedia in English. I don't understand about licenses, really.
- Being suddenly blocked, with the risk of losing the photos that I uploaded and no participating on the debate, with an anxiety attack I asked for help to a friend who's English teacher, that it was another of my problems of not being able to communicate correctly because I don't know English, I asked them to create an account to post the disclaimer of those pictures are not free in the United States and to post on the debate. Because of my anxiety I couldn't think that the administrator who blocked me would believe that I created another account, and they help me to translate my first message as a claim.
- Later, you intervened, and my friend was busy, so I commented in an anxiety state once again, I decided to use Google translator that it was a great error cause I know it isn't 100% effective, even so I used it because of my impulse. If you compare my previous message with this one, you'll see the difference, and it has a lot of grammar mistakes, however this one it has structure, my friend helped me with the translation.
- Well, I wanted to say on that time that I'd never abuse of multiple accounts because I know that it's a fault that gets a block, and I wanted to I'm administrator in a wiki ([1]) and I alreadu explained the thing of the photos.
- I insist I never created another account, no before and nor after being blocked. My friend is the North America and I'm from the South America. The reason of my permanent blocking was because multiple accounts' abuse, that isn't fair because I've never do it. My original blocking was done (long time ago).
- I ask you in the kindest way my unlocking. I pledge to be more careful with what I upload, I'll ask for advice to an administrator. --Josedm (talk) 08:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Users can be unblocked, if they recognize the problem (you already did it) and if they give a credible promise not to continue (you have not done that). So for unblocking you must explain, how to distinguish free files from unfree files. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Well, I want to upload 100% free material, if you want to check I have the links.
- Users can be unblocked, if they recognize the problem (you already did it) and if they give a credible promise not to continue (you have not done that). So for unblocking you must explain, how to distinguish free files from unfree files. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- I ask you in the kindest way my unlocking. I pledge to be more careful with what I upload, I'll ask for advice to an administrator. --Josedm (talk) 08:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Being blocked a week it's ok, but a permanent blocking it's frustrating and too much for something that I didn't commit. I emphasize that I'm blocked because of "multiple accounts abuse", not by uploading pictures without free license in United States. It was never proved that account presumably mine was like that, it was never investigated, even the IP wasn't check, neither asked me to show that account wasn't me but my friend's.
- I reafirm again, in the most humble and sincerely my unblocking. And anything I want to do, I'll ask first. --Josedm (talk) 07:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- You have still problems with copyright. You wanted to upload https://www.flickr.com/photos/culturaargentina/20529677153/ into Commons. This is a bad idea. Please explain, what is wrong with that photo. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Being a poster of Ministry of Culture (Ministerio de Cultura) Argentina, by the way is not too poster but a picture that was uploaded by a Flickr account of Ministerio de Cultura, and that picture is not the original one. I believe everything was ok.
- But my terms were wrong, and despite from coming from Ministerio de Cultura Argentina's account that doesn't qualify with the requirements, so I don't upload that photo in case of being unblocked. --Josedm (talk) 03:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- You have still problems with copyright. You wanted to upload https://www.flickr.com/photos/culturaargentina/20529677153/ into Commons. This is a bad idea. Please explain, what is wrong with that photo. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- I reafirm again, in the most humble and sincerely my unblocking. And anything I want to do, I'll ask first. --Josedm (talk) 07:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- "Abusing multiple accounts" comprises both sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry. Josedm has again and again acknowledged meatpupptry:
- The utter lack of clue to continue representing, especially with more than a year's time to investigate (!!!), that "i'd never abuse of multiple accounts" is shameless. This is to say nothing of the copyright issue, which, also after a year's time, is not understood (reconcile the belief that this and this are acceptable with COM:FOP Argentina and COM:DW). Эlcobbola talk 18:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: I didn't know those rules, I didn't know that was not permitted, but I have mentioned, I felt bad, I didn't want lose all the pictures which were eliminated. I needed help from someone who could handle with the language to communicate better, if I knew I couldn't ask for help, I'm so embarrassed to do that.
- In the face of anger and frustration of my permanent blocking, I didn't to continue, but I always wanted to come back and show that I didn't use two accounts, but I postponed because of discouragement or being afraid of something worse.
- About the photos I uploaded protecting me of the argentinian laws it was because I saw many rock articles from 80's.
- Here you can see some examples: I didn't see problems with those quoted examples, I thought everything was under control.
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charly_García
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enanitos_Verdes_(1988).png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:G.I.T._(1986).png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CeratiAlbertiBosio.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soda_Stereo_1986.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GritoLeda.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gustavo_cerati_gabrielrocca.jpg
- Responding to the last thing, about the sculpture and reproduction of a picture, I said that I thought everything was ok because they were uploaded by the Ministerio de Cultura Argentina and as part the government there weren't troubles. Here you can see the author of the sculpture next to his artwork, next to the Minister Tristán Bauer . But after reading all of this, and despite of being from Ministerio de Cultura Argentina that is not enough, so I'll stop insisting of uploading those images, and I'll replace them with the guitar and from concerts instead.
- I ask to giving me a chance. I recognize my mistakes and errors, and I apologize because of that. I compromise to inform me better and ask for help with an administrator. --Josedm (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Archivo:Los Prisioneros Narea Gonzalez Tapia.jpg
[edit]Hola. Quisiera la referencia fiable que la imagen Archivo:Los Prisioneros Narea Gonzalez Tapia.jpg la tomaron en Argentina para que cuente con licencia de permiso aquí (en la Wiki). Gracias de antemano. Rolo Mai (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Licencia de Los Prisioneros Narea Gonzalez Tapia.jpg
[edit]Hola. Quisiera la referencia fiable que la imagen Archivo:Los Prisioneros Narea Gonzalez Tapia.jpg la tomaron en Argentina para que cuente con licencia de permiso aquí (en la Wiki). Gracias de antemano. (Rolo Mai (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC))
- Según tenía entendido, no era realmente necesario que se haya tomado la foto en Argentina sino que se haya publicado allá y esa foto tuviera más de 25 años de antigüedad. De acuerdo a la ley del artículo 34 de Argentina «Art. 34. — Para las obras fotográficas la duración del derecho de propiedad es de VEINTE (20) años a partir de la fecha de la primera publicación.» No dice nada de que la foto se tuvo que tomar en el país, si no la publicación, al menos así lo interpreté yo. Así pasa con la foto que hay de Los Ángeles Negros no dice que fue tomada en Argentina sino que fue publicada en una revista. --Josedm (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Imagen sin permiso aparente
[edit]Hola. He añadido plantilla de eliminación de la imagen Carátula la cultua de la basura los prisioneros.jpg publicada por ti. Si tienes el permiso adecuado o eres el autor por favor comunicarlo en la página de Discusióhhhhj para solucionar el problema al instante. Gracias de antemano. Rolo Mai (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hola. Esa foto subí hace casi 10 años, no tenía idea de las licencias y actualmente sigo sin entender, porque cuando creo que hay imágenes que subo que cumplen con los requisitos resulta que siempre no como este caso. Basado en la portada del álbum blanco de The Beatles que tiene como licencia
“ | Esta imagen, o el texto representado en ella, consiste sólo en formas geométricas simples y texto. Esto no alcanza el umbral de originalidad necesario para que esté protegido por derechos de autor, por lo tanto, está en dominio público. No obstante, podría estar sujeto a otro tipo de restricciones. Véase WP:PD#Fonts o Template talk:PD-textlogo para más información. | ” |
- No puedo debatir porque estoy bloqueado para siempre injustamente por algo que yo NO hice: abusar de cuentas múltiples, y no me han dado la oportunidad de demostrarlo. Pero aunque pudiera debatir, luego de esa situación para nada agradable, ya no tengo ganas de discutir, ya no sé que está bien o que está mal. --Josedm (talk) 21:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Carátula la cultua de la basura los prisioneros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Carátula de laculturadelabasura de Los Prisioneros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |