User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2021/August
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Afonso Pena International Airport photo
That Afonso Pena International Airport photo was from 1997!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:18:45:F1D6:44C5:5D14:BDEE:DE2A (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Theuser555: No, it was taken 2020:05:26 09:45:11 by Rafael Ferreira per https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9752846 . How did you get the right to license it? Please login. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
A goat for you!
"Thank and you're welcome" gave me a big laugh this morning. Thanks :)
Missvain (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: Thanks for fixing the DR and file status, and for the goat. You're welcome re your thanks. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
SignBot not working
@Jeff G.: I wanted to ask if the SignBot is workin or not. If you can see my talk page, signbot is spamming the templates. I saw every recent thing I done, and it was preceded by four tides.Is there any malfunction with this. If there is, how to fix it? This is irritating and will decrease my rating when I try to get a right. They will get the grab of it, and I am just gone --Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Contributers2020: SignBot last posted to your user talk page 03:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC). That was two minutes after you made this edit with an unmatched {{Delh}}, as per the design of the bot. It previously posted 13:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC), two minutes after you did the same thing in this other edit. It previously posted 02:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC), two minutes after you posted an actual unsigned comment in this third edit. So yes, it has been working as designed over the last few days. Please be more careful, and use {{Delh}}, a separator, {{subst:nac}}, a sig, and {{Delf}} in the same edit when non-admin closing DRs, like I did here and there. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Source URL changes
Please undo all of your changes to the source URLs of images in the set including File:Lantern Slide - Tangyes Ltd, AA Type Petrol Engine, circa 1910.jpg - the new URLs you applied are not the sources for the mages concerned. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:33, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: Those were related to YuriNikolai's request at Commons:Bots/Work requests#Updating many source links. I'm sorry if the museums' websites misplaced the source image (the old URL doesn't work either). — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- The old URLs - the valid source of the images - are archived at the Wayback Machine; the new URL - which are not the sources of the images, despite your claims to the contrary - are not, and are not valid; nor is there any evidence that they ever have been. Again: please revert the edits (including your revert of my edit here). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- How can you claim that the new URLs are not valid when the images are literally accessible there? The old URL is redirecting people to the new one, except in browsers where it doesn't because its certs expired, which causes users to get safety warnings and get blocked out of the museum's website. The museum has moved all images from one system using museumvictoria to museumsvictoria. This is where all users will find them now. It's a good thing that the old URLs are archived but these links have been updated, and this is a simple matter of updating them here as well for the convenience of everyone involved. I genuinely don't know what you mean when you say there is no evidence that the new URLs have ever been valid. Did you even open it? YuriNikolai (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- EDIT:The specific URl you linked to - link - was in fact never archived in the Wayback Machine except as a redirect, which leads precisely to the link we have added. Otherwise, it displays the museum's 404 page. YuriNikolai (talk) 01:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- I have found other links which may have been broken by the bot edit. Most of the bot edits are, IMO, necessary, but some of the ones linking to direct image links may need to be updated. I'll post about this on Commons:Bots/Work requests#Updating many source links however as it's better than keeping this discussion isolated. YuriNikolai (talk) 17:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- The old URLs - the valid source of the images - are archived at the Wayback Machine; the new URL - which are not the sources of the images, despite your claims to the contrary - are not, and are not valid; nor is there any evidence that they ever have been. Again: please revert the edits (including your revert of my edit here). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Jeff G. Hello, thanks for the replacements! However i have noticed a replacement happened on File:Dasyurus geoffroii Gould.jpg, which had a link with museumvictoria on its URL but wasn't indexed in the category/following the URL convention we were working with, so broke with the replacement. I worry other links may have been replaced from museumvictoria to museumsvictoria outside of Collections from Museums Victoria too. Other images on the same category (The Mammals of Australia (John Gould) that didn't have museumvictoria in their URL were not affected, so maybe the edit went through searching for words without checking on what category it worked, which affected sources from MV's old bioinformatics system (which is in dire need of a bot to add Wayback Machine links, but that's another story). Can you help with reverting these cases, if they exist? YuriNikolai (talk) 01:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @YuriNikolai: Sorry, as the problem at museumvictoria.com.au affected all browses to there, I replaced all references to it. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- No problem, from what i can tell by searching in sources, it will be manageable to fix the ones using the bioinformatics format manually. YuriNikolai (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Deletion?
@Jeff G.: long time no see . Would take a look at these images? Might be they should be deleted. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje: Hi again, I hope you are well. I warned the user and started Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ਗੁਰਜੰਟ ਸਿੰਘ. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:12, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff G. I am extremely well (Covid free = extremely well) You too I may hope? Thanks for Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ਗੁਰਜੰਟ ਸਿੰਘ. I feel a lot better when you make these kind of deletion requests. Lotje (talk) 11:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje: Yes, I have had 2 shots of the Pfizer COVID 19 vaccine, and I strongly urge all eligible people to get vaccinated. Have you at least read COM:MDR and COM:VFC? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I to got my 2 shots..., but urging all eligible people to get vaccinated is unfortunately not enough, I am afraid. People should realize being vaccinated is not a free ticket to safety. On the contrary, it created a false sense of safety amongst the vaccinated. Somehow, only relatively few people seem to understand being vaccinated is one thing, keeping social distance in an effort not to spread the virus (even amongst vaccinated) is even more important. Last month 7 fully vaccinated elderly in a nursing home died from a Covid-19 variant from Columbia. The virus has no frontiers... And no, I never read COM:MDR (on my watchlist now) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje: Yes, I have had 2 shots of the Pfizer COVID 19 vaccine, and I strongly urge all eligible people to get vaccinated. Have you at least read COM:MDR and COM:VFC? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff G. I am extremely well (Covid free = extremely well) You too I may hope? Thanks for Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ਗੁਰਜੰਟ ਸਿੰਘ. I feel a lot better when you make these kind of deletion requests. Lotje (talk) 11:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I have nominated this image for deletion but I do not think that the reason I nominated this image for deletion was right, so I decided to delete my nomination but the wikimedia commons refuses to let me delete It because It sees It as blanking and unconstructive edit. so can you help me. Kiro Bassem (talk) 11:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Kiro Bassem: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abu Hamza al-Masri.jpg is still active, please comment there. You may find {{Withdrawn}} or {{Vk}} helpful there. See also COM:D. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I'm working on this case. Can you tell me why do you suspect it's a derivated work? Perhaps from a paper photo? Thanks- --Ganímedes (talk) 11:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: The watermark and the uploader's desire to upload here a copyrighted photo of a copyrighted toy mascot wearing a copyrighted uniform. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- The "watermark" just says "Plaza Mayor de Orense y Ayuntamiento" ("Plaza Mayor of Orense and City Hall") and looks more like a label. The file has got full EXIF. Anyway, Mussklprozz has approved the ticket. Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:36, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:48, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- The "watermark" just says "Plaza Mayor de Orense y Ayuntamiento" ("Plaza Mayor of Orense and City Hall") and looks more like a label. The file has got full EXIF. Anyway, Mussklprozz has approved the ticket. Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:36, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm writing here since the other editor seems not online right now and I'd ask you to look at this discussion: all I did was upload a file with a free license from Flickr (posted by this user on March 28th 2020, with the following permission: "Autor je predao fotografiju na korištenje za promotivne svrhe.") on Commons, but @Ytoyoda: claims the picture was taken from this article, which was written on 5th October 2020, months later. Recently I've added more information about the file and since the file was also reviewed by a bot, and obviously I didn't mean make any copyright violation. Thanks, --France3c0 (talk) 15:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- @France3c0: I started Commons:Deletion requests/File:Senidah at 2020 MAC.jpg for you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! --France3c0 (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- @France3c0: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! --France3c0 (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Atletico Madrid
Hi Jeff G.,
It's been over 3 days since our discussion at the helpdesk about renaming Atlético de Madrid players categories along the lines of other club categories in Category:Women's association football players by club in Spain and Category:Association football players by team in Spain. Because nobody has added anything since the 12th, and there were no objections, I think we can safely move forward. A glance at your userpage showed me you have tons more experience than I do here, so how do you suggest we move on?
By the way:Have you noticed that of the above categories, 1 is by club and the other 1 is by team? As you can see here: Category:Association football players by team by country and here: Category:Women's association football players by club by country, this is across the board!
Regards, --Dutchy45 (talk) 06:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Dutchy45: I asked Jmabel to go for it in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Please undelete File:Putin palace exterior 2626.jpg
OTRS discussion: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2021#File:Putin_palace_aqua-discotheque_2616.jpg_and_other_files
- One of the files remained deleted: File:Putin palace exterior 2626.jpg --Anoneska (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Mussklprozz as ticketholder for Ticket:2021043010008237. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Anoneska: As far as I can see, the file had been restored according to the ticket, but later it got deleted again. Maybe that I just missed to insert the permission template, or maybe someone removed it afterwards by an act of vadalism. I issued a new undeletion request. Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Done File is restored and permission tag added. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Mussklprozz: It appears you forgot. Thanks for getting it restored. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:32, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Done File is restored and permission tag added. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Anoneska: As far as I can see, the file had been restored according to the ticket, but later it got deleted again. Maybe that I just missed to insert the permission template, or maybe someone removed it afterwards by an act of vadalism. I issued a new undeletion request. Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging @Mussklprozz as ticketholder for Ticket:2021043010008237. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope?
Hello Jeff G. are these images out of scope in your opinion? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje: Yes, indeed. I reported them, and in looking further found and reported a sockfarm at COM:ANU#Mohammed Khan Chowdhury sockfarm. Also, in case you didn't notice, I have another active RfA. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Tagging
You have tagged only User:കണ്ണിപൊയിൽ സഖാക്കൾ as suspected sockpuppet, please tag rest of the socks too which are globally locked under Adhithya Kiran Chekavar. Pv67 and Ninetyeightpointone are also locked.--137.97.87.130 08:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Done. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Use of an image on luier
Hello Jeff G. wondering if you know where I can address myself to have any clarification about the usage of this image outside commons. It is a perfect image to illustrate the word. I do not want to end up in trouble for adding it on the Dutch wiktionary because of the personallity rights. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje: Any use on any WMF project should be fine. Commercial use in a print ad in the US would be a problem without a model release from the baby's agent, parent, or guardian. See also COM:REUSE. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Geff G. Lotje (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Lotje: You're welcome, but please call me Jeff. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Geff G. Lotje (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Utilisation Fichier provenant de Geneanet
Bonjour Jeff G., Ayant commis, au départ beaucoup d'erreurs, je voudrais avoir votre avis sur l'utilisation, dans Wikimedia Commons, d'un fichier image provenant du site Geneanet et qui est enregistré sous la licence CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 creative Commons, le fichier en question, et s'il est possible de l'utiliser, comment dois-je, techniquement, pour le télécharger dans Wikimedia Commons. Merci pour votre aide. Bien cordialement. --Ltqphg (talk) 17:40, 28 août 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Ltqphg : nous ne permettons pas les licences avec le terme NC ici, car ce ne sont pas assez « libres ». Voir COM:L svp.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:02, 28 août 2021 (UTC)
- Merci pour votre réponse. Bien cordialement. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Jeff, since your userpage is on my watchlist coming back to above conversation: images with the CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 license, would thos be okay? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 11:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ltqphg, Odysseus1479, and Lotje: I'm sorry, but the license restriction "‐NonCommercial" AKA -nc- (noncommercial) is not usable by itself for Wikimedia Commons. For the reasons, please see Commons:Licensing/Justifications. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Jeff, since your userpage is on my watchlist coming back to above conversation: images with the CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 license, would thos be okay? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 11:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Merci pour votre réponse. Bien cordialement. --Ltqphg (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Not actually deleted
There seems to have been some sort of glitch. Hopefully now fixed. Thank you for pointing it out. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: You're welcome, and thanks for taking the time to address it and the other Admin work you do! — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Attention to another suspect user
I've just discovered another user Uaileann having some problematic edits in his user contributions, maybe he is another sockpuppet of Đăng Đàn Cung. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 16:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Great Brightstar: Might it instead be better to report as Musée Annam? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Great Brightstar: I reported the user to m:srg#Global lock for socks of Đăng Đàn Cung and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Namkhanh02. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)