Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Namkhanh02
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Namkhanh02
[edit]
- Namkhanh02 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- 2405:4802:1CC0:D040:390E:9990:7336:43F3 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
- 2405:4802:1CFD:C5C0:7517:E250:D5B0:4504 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • tools • luxo's • crossblock • block user • block log
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: (Was directed here from COM:ANUP. I haven't had to deal with this before, so I'm sorry if this isn't where this should be done or if I miss anything) Second listed IP left message on my talk page saying, in the middle of many angry words, that File:Flag of the Vietnamese Republican Youth Movement.svg is "[their] drawing", linking them to User:Vietnam.Conghoa and therefore User:Namkhanh02. The first IP started the discussion about the file two weeks ago, and I'm assuming it's the same person on another device or after a DHCP release and renewal. I was told at COM:ANUP the entire 2405:4802:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 IPv6 range is concerned, but there's just too many addresses there to check. Thank you and sorry. Rubýñ (Talk) 06:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Declined - Please review the instructions at COM:RFCU, which include "The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses." Эlcobbola talk 15:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Эlcobbola: Thanks for looking at this case. Without revealing anything publicly, could you please block the IPs which are a violation of Namkhanh02's block. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
- Эlcobbola: Thanks for looking at this case. Without revealing anything publicly, could you please block the IPs which are a violation of Namkhanh02's block. Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Namkhanh02
[edit]
- Namkhanh02 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Kim-giao tr (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Krolet (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Nam Hương Tử (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Nhatminh817 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Rvnvnch (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Uaileann (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Unserefahne (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Velenic (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Vân Tiên (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 大南ー統 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 安南風化 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 民爲貴 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- 花箋 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Duykien (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Vietnam.Conghoa (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale
[edit]- Reason: Similar vandalism patterns. Unblocked and unlocked. Membership in Category:Sockpuppets of Đăng Đàn Cung or Category:Sockpuppets of Namkhanh02. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeff_G.&diff=587671245&oldid=587609653 and m:srg#Global lock for socks of Đăng Đàn Cung. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: , these are all burner accounts, you're not going to see any activity from them as I have observed this user for years now ans asked others to ask a global ban for them, but I don't think that actually blocking their old socks is productive, as I've yet to ever seen them use "sleeper socks", plus checkusers can't check accounts that haven't been used in years and Uaileann is an obvious sock I noticed on day 1 (one) because he's always stupid enough to stick his hands in homeypots. Anyhow, I'm not sure if blocking unused accounts is a productive way to spend admin time. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Declined - Every account but Uaileann would be
Stale; there would thus be nothing to which to compare it. If Uaileann is editing disruptively ("Similar vandalism patterns," although no evidence was provided), handling can be based on behaviour. Эlcobbola talk 15:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Namkhanh02
[edit]- Namkhanh02 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
[edit]- Huyme (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- JVevermindDVT (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
- Phanlinhhn (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale
[edit]- Reason: There really isn't any doubt that this user is the same person, sockpuppeting. However, I am requesting a RFCU so that we may place a block on any IP or IP ranges with minimal collateral damage, as I don't feel like playing whack-a-mole on a daily basis. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Results
[edit]- I'm not sure. There is too much collateral on the IP ranges. Please keep reporting new socks so I can keep checking it. Trijnsteltalk 18:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Another sock: Metalgun (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Forgot to reply here, but I checked them yesterday. Trijnsteltalk 15:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Another sock: Metalgun (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log ) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.