User talk:Iwaqarhashmi/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
No license
Hi, Do not tag with "no license" files which do have a license. If the license is not valid, please create a deletion request with arguments. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right, that was a mistake on my part. I meant to tag the files with "no source" instead of "no license." Thanks for pointing it out! Waqar💬 08:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect speedy deletion reason
Hello Iwaqarhashmi. It seems you have submitted J-Ser 1.png for speedy deletion because it was assumed to be a personal photo by an non-contributor. I have uploaded this photo because I am currently working on a Dutch article about artist J-Ser. I'm asking to remove this deletion request as I think it does not meet the criteria (CSD F10). It is no selfie nor low quality and it contributes to the article. Joumanist (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joumanist The image was tagged for speedy deletion (CSD F10) because it appears to be a personal photo. Additionally, the article itself is being considered for deletion due to Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. If you believe J-Ser meets notability requirements, you can request undeletion of both the image and article by following Wikipedia's procedures. Waqar💬 14:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the article is currently under review, I have made some major changes after the initial deletion request. I find the instructions somewhat unclear as to where I can send such an undeletion request, though I would greatly appreciate some help with this as I'm fairly new to Wikipedia. As I mentioned before it is no personal photo and is not under any copyright, so the picture itself should be fine to use on Wikipedia. Joumanist (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Joumanist that's great that you've made significant changes to the article. I can definitely point you in the right direction. Wikipedia itself is quite helpful with these processes. If you head back to your talk page, there should be instructions specific to that file's deletion. These instructions will tell you exactly where to submit your undeletion request. In the meantime, if the image usage is relevant and adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines, that shouldn't be an issue during the undeletion process. Here's hoping everything goes smoothly! Waqar💬 19:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the article is currently under review, I have made some major changes after the initial deletion request. I find the instructions somewhat unclear as to where I can send such an undeletion request, though I would greatly appreciate some help with this as I'm fairly new to Wikipedia. As I mentioned before it is no personal photo and is not under any copyright, so the picture itself should be fine to use on Wikipedia. Joumanist (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow thank you very much for granting me autopatrol rights! I appreciate your trust in my contributions and edits.
- I understand that this doesn't affect my editing process, but it will definitely help streamline the review process for both myself and the patrollers. This allows them to focus on edits that might need more attention. I'm also excited about the additional features available to me, these will be very helpful for my future contributions.
- Thanks again for this recognition! Waqar💬 15:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thank you for tirelessly catching vandals and username violations! All the best -- Chuck Talk 16:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) |
- @Alachuckthebuck Appreciate the kind words! I'll do my best to keep an eye out and keep things positive. Waqar💬 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are welcome (honestly, seeing the volume of your posts to com:AN/B has been astonishing.
- All the best -- Chuck Talk 18:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. I appreciate you recognizing my contributions. I'm so glad my work has been helpful. Waqar💬 18:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey,
I have received the speed deletion notification for my edit on Chandrashekhar Bandiyappa page. Can i please know the reason? Rakspraks (talk) 15:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- File:Bandiyappa 2.jpg was removed because it falls under CSD F10, which applies to personal photo uploaded by people who are not regular Wikipedia contributors. Waqar💬 15:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey,
Hi, my name is Pedro, I'm a member of the Projeto Mais Teoria da História na Wiki. The images File:Foto Fátima 2024.jpg and File:Foto frente Fátima 2024.jpg have been flagged for deletion. I would like to clarify that the user uploaded these images because they will be used in the promotional artwork for the Mais Mulheres event. The user will be one of the organizers of the event. The event information can be accessed at this link. Could I advise her to upload them again, indicating the need to include this category? Pedro Henrique Batistella (Projeto Mais+) (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I'd be glad to help Pedro, but I can't advise re-uploading the images without proper attribution (copyright considerations and acceptable licenses) according to Wikimedia Commons guidelines. By following these guidelines, your user can ensure that the images are properly attributed and licensed for use on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Waqar💬 20:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Flagging images for copyright issues
Hi there, please stop flagging my own images for copyright issues. I took them myself attending the festivals as press. The images also have corresponding licensing models attached. The author is also attached properly. If there are any more issues, please let me know. Timlukask (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- So it was not you who took the photograph, it was taken in the Duma in Russia by a photographer whom I know, he gave the go-ahead for the use of this photograph from an article from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation https://kprf-ugra.ru/archives/24781 Umarochka (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Patroller!
Hi Iwaqarhashmi,
You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.
As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.
We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.
If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.
Kadı Message 18:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Iwaqarhashmi. Thanks for the work that you do. However, when you come across selfies like this please don't tag them with {{No permission since}}. These can be CSD'ed normally under COM:CSD#F10 criteria of speedy deletions. Selfies uploaded by the one who's in the subject don't need VRT permission tags and similarly those files that are uploaded as own. If such files are not own, and there is a valid reason, those should be marked as copyright violation. Best regards, ─ Aafī (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely! Thanks for clarifying this. I'll keep this in mind when reviewing uploads. Waqar💬 06:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This is getting annoying.
Maybe if you hadn't deleted my User page, which I was in the middle of working on and lost all my hard work on, I'd have a place to put the photos I've uploaded. Please stop.
Karusamsu (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand you're upset about losing your work, but user pages should be dedicated to contributions made to the encyclopedia itself, not personal storage. This is outlined in the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST. Best, Waqar💬 16:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
speedy noms
Hi. Please have a level of AGF when someone uploads an image and not within five minutes nominate it as a personal image for deletion. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Adding to what Billinghurst says, in general speedy deletions are for the obvious cases where it doesn't require a deletion discussion. So if the deletion reason isn't clear cut, a DR is always better. Abzeronow (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Waqar💬 07:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Rollback right given
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Kadı Message 11:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I want upadate that article please support me
I want upadate that article please support me
Thank you Ravikumar1993 (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for your valuable contributions. AnnaLanuza (talk) 08:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
Hi Iwaqarhashmi, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Jianhui67 T★C 09:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
File renaming query
Thank you for helping process rename requests. I noticed two recent renames from your account:
- File:מעבר חצייה מוגבה – מיתון תנועה באוניברסיטת בר-אילן.jpg -> File:מעבר חצייה מוגבה – מיתון תנועה באוניברסיטת בר-אילן (ליד שער 40), יולי 2024.jpg
- File:מחפר של Hyundai בעבודות בנייה באשדוד.jpg -> File:מחפר של Hyundai בעבודות בנייה באשדוד, יולי 2024.jpg
I do not speak Hebrew and cannot determine whether these two rename requests met rename guidelines.
Are you using Google Translate or some other tool to determine what the difference is between existing names and requested names? If not, it would to best to avoid rename requests for file names that are not in English or in a language you do not speak. If you are, then I guess that is OK even though it requires that extra effort and still might miss things. A native speaker would be able to handle these requests much more efficiently and accurately. Regards. // sikander { talk } 🦖 03:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Two more:
- French file name: File:M (375) Pupitre électrique Siège Simon.jpg
- Spanish file name: File:Presentación del recorrido en el sector del romeral G37.jpg
Do you speak Spanish and French? // sikander { talk } 🦖 03:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Sikander,
- Thanks for reaching out about the recent rename requests. Yes, I am currently using Google Translate to get a general idea of the meaning behind non-English filenames. It helps me understand the topic and allows me to make basic decisions about the rename request. Also, I do know some basic Spanish. Just so you know, if something seems unclear, I avoid making changes unless I'm very confident about the meaning. Waqar💬 06:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Unfinished move GNU nano 8.1.png
Hi, could you please complete the rename request of File:GNU nano 8.1.png? Thanks. —Mykhal (talk) 20:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done, I tagged it for speedy deletion. Waqar💬 20:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
apology
i apologise for posting this that are not related to education by then didn't know the aim of this site 102.70.6.138 05:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Photos de la révolution des oeillets, sur les mêmes lieux, 40 ans après (14195651678).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Photos de la révolution des oeillets, sur les mêmes lieux, 40 ans après (14380830312).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Photos de la révolution des oeillets, sur les mêmes lieux, 40 ans après (14382250985).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Photos de la révolution des oeillets, sur les mêmes lieux, 40 ans après (14359161846).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Photos de la révolution des oeillets, sur les mêmes lieux, 40 ans après (14382248565).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Lisbonne, 40 ans après sur les mêmes lieux (14378926821).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Flying animals
It looks like you just added 490 photos of birds to Category:Flying animals. All birds are already part of this category by virtue of being in Category:Birds, etc. Please undo. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites, done Waqar💬 20:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. It looks like a lot of these photos are just in Category:Birds but not in more specific categories. If possible, it would be good to put them in more narrow categories, like for species. Otherwise it can be hard for people to use them. e.g. File:Baby Canada Goose (14317103271).jpg says it's a baby Canada goose. That means it would go in Category:Branta canadensis (juvenile). Up to you if that's something you want to do, though. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 20:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're right, it's important to put photos in specific categories so people can find them easily. It's a lot of work, and I'm busy uploading new ones. I'll try to do it if I have more free time. Best, Waqar💬 20:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. It looks like a lot of these photos are just in Category:Birds but not in more specific categories. If possible, it would be good to put them in more narrow categories, like for species. Otherwise it can be hard for people to use them. e.g. File:Baby Canada Goose (14317103271).jpg says it's a baby Canada goose. That means it would go in Category:Branta canadensis (juvenile). Up to you if that's something you want to do, though. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 20:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Trees
Category:Unidentified trees in the United States is a better placeholder category than Category:Trees, when transferring a lot of images from a particular Flickr user who hasn't tried to identify the trees either. I've just done a batch replace to categorise such images from Daniel R. Blume. Belbury (talk) 11:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha, thanks! Waqar💬 15:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Chocolat (2864434006).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 05:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Title transfer .ogg
Hello dear, you rename some files to .oga, however the file extension should be .ogg. thanks إسلام (talk) 20:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, it looks like the file extensions changed to .oga automatically when I tried to rename them. Waqar💬 20:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Could you please support to delete them to can upload again with correct extension. إسلام (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, dear license reviewer
Hi Iwaqarhashmi, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.
Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!
Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --Regards, Aafi (talk) 08:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Dauda Malik.png
Mind nominating the Wikidata page for deletion as well when you encounter this kind of spam? Trade (talk) 20:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks! Waqar💬 22:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Demirkapı Tüneli - 31.08.2024 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bluetime93 💬 16:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Demirkapı Tüneli - 31.08.2024 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bluetime93 💬 16:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Demirkapı Tüneli - 31.08.2024 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bluetime93 💬 16:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Demirkapı Tüneli - 31.08.2024 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bluetime93 💬 16:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Demirkapı Tüneli - 31.08.2024 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
bluetime93 💬 16:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Mural (4439651523).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
please remove templates after you done about renaming
thanks, check: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Happiness_II_Bridge_(Menghe).jpg&action=history
also, i copy pasted your edit notice page. it is good. thank you :D, also check: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Modern_primat/Editnotice modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, it was a script bug. Since you're a file mover, you must know we don't remove templates manually after moving files; it's a completely automated procedure. Also, the move error sometimes happens to lots of users, and I have to remove the template manually. Thanks for fixing it btw! Waqar💬 14:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Template editor given
Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Template line break fix
Congrats on template editor rights!
Can I ask for your help in figuring out where an unnecessary <br />
tag in Template:LicenseReview/layout-passed is coming from? For example, on File:Sharmeen_Murshid_and_Helena_Dalli_G20_Women_Empowerment_Ministerial_Meeting.jpg#Licensing the HTML printed is:
<p><br /><style data-mw-deduplicate="TemplateStyles:r892700814">.mw-parser-output .license-review-passed{width:100%;margin:0.5em auto;background:var(--background-color-success-subtle,#d5fdf4);padding:5px;border:1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1)}.mw-parser-output .license-review-failed{width:100%;margin:0.5em auto;background:var(--background-color-error-subtle,#fee7e6);padding:5px;border:1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1)}.mw-parser-output .license-review-needed{width:100%;margin:0.5em auto;background:var(--background-color-warning-subtle,#fef6e7);padding:5px;border:1px solid var(--border-color-base,#a2a9b1)}</style></p>
It might be the linebreak in <noinclude>[[Category:Layout templates]]</noinclude>
in that template, but I cannot test this. When you get a chance, please take a look. Thanks! // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, there's no
<br />
tag in the source code of the above template: <templatestyles src="LicenseReview/styles.css" /> :{| class="license-review-passed" dir="{{#dir:{{{lang|}}}}}" :|- :|[[File:Checked copyright icon.svg|link=|40px|alt=]] :|{{lang| {{{lang|}}} | {{{text|empty}}}}} :|}{{Iffile|{{#if:{{{passed_cat|}}}|[[Category:{{{passed_cat|}}}]]|[[Category:{{#ifeq:{{{site_name}}}|license|Files from external sources with reviewed licenses|Admin reviewed {{{site_name}}} images}}|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}}}<noinclude> :[[Category:Layout templates]] :</noinclude>
Waqar💬 08:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)- Yeah, but there is a linebreak after
<noinclude>
and perhaps that is being rendered as a<br />
tag when transpiled. // sikander { talk } 🦖 13:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)- I don't think that's the issue. It's more likely that the line break is simply being ignored by the transpilation process. This is because
<noinclude>
tags are typically used to exclude content from the final output. Therefore, any content within a tag, including line breaks, is not intended to be rendered. Waqar💬 13:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)- I wonder where it is coming from. Content in the noinclude tag should be ignored, but that is the only text that looks unusual to me. For example File:BombayHook2018-26 (48432026177).jpg does not have the extra br tag in the license area. Anyways, thank you looking into it. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think that's the issue. It's more likely that the line break is simply being ignored by the transpilation process. This is because
- Yeah, but there is a linebreak after
Template:Cquote
Hello, Waqar Hashmi. Could you please check why this Template isn’t working on my user page. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 14:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like you're trying to use the Cquote template inside another template. This must be causing the issue. Templates are designed to be used independently, not nested within each other. Try placing it directly on your user page, outside of any other template. This should allow it to function correctly and display the quote as intended. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- But other templates on the page are working fine.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 07:02, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Noincluding
Hi. Please noinclude cats when adding them to DR subpages as here. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, the Krd bot does that automatically, but I'll add noinclude manually from now on. Best, Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)