User talk:Ies/Archive 2015-1

Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nidrac36

Please dont delete these Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Nidrac36

Hey Ies. Can we please keep these pictures ON. You said they were low quality. Thats really not the case. It seems that way, because they're taken with astronomical filters. They have some interesting artifacts on them. Some of the artifacts looks blurry, like as if they're moving or that the camera is. But looking at the background & foreground, you can see the buildings & trees are stationary, so thats not the case. These are some interesting pics. Please let them be, they definitely have educational value. thanks :)Emphatik (talk) 10:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ies. Can we close this nomination request & keep the pictures as detailed in the nomination page? Its been a little over a week now. thanks Emphatik (talk) 22:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not happy that a sockpuppet supports the delition request. However, there was one week time to give the images useful descriptions and appropriate categories so that other users can see that the images are filter tests, that the bad look is provoked to demonstrate something etc., and therefore the images are worth to be kept. But nothing happens. We still have *very low* quality images with a vague descriptions and without any category. Hence I think that even the uploader doubts about his images. Moreover, if you look for sun filter images in the web you only find *much better* quality images what means that the images here in question are much worse in any comparsion. Until now I can't see any reason to keep them. -- Ies (talk) 07:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ies, they were meant to be "low quality" in that what hes trying to capture are the artifacts that show up when he uses filters to photograph the sun. I've added that to the description. The author is himself Italian, which is why he didnt add a description.Emphatik (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Globales Benutzerkonto

Hallo Ies! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass dein globales Benutzerkonto nicht mit deinem dewiki-Konto verbunden ist. Hat dies einen besonderen Grund? In den nächsten Wochen werden alle Benutzerkonten in irgendeiner Weise eindeutige globale Konten werden. Da fänd ich es sinnvoller, dies über Special:MergeAccount lieber direkt selbst zu steuern, bevor lokale Konten noch irgendwie umbenannt werden. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo DerHexer, danke der Nachfrage, das wollte ich sowieso gradebiegen lassen. Ich selbst kann es leider nicht. Das notwendige Passwort habe ich nach Umzug auf einen neuen Computer nicht mehr. Ein neues Passwort kann ich mir nicht per E-Mail zusenden lassen, da die damals für das dewiki-Konto angegebene Mailadresse nicht mehr existiert. Kannst Du helfen und alle Kontenangaben an die von Commons angleichen? -- Ies (talk) 05:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why removing category

Hi, I'm wondering why you have removed the "Category:Natural patterns" on my images like this one? File:Frost-pattern_2.png Please add it again for all the images and the next time you have ideas like this please contact me first so we can discuss it, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goran tek-en, there is no need for any discussion. The images were over-categorized and that's what I corrected. Note that Category:Frost patterns is a child category of Category:Natural patterns. Therefore adding the latter as additional category is wrong. For further information about categorizing and why images shouldn't be over-categorized please read Commons:Categories. Btw, Category:Eisblume was completely wrong! -- Ies (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder kategorisieren

Hallo,

danke für diesen Hiweis. Leider weiß ich aber nicht, was Du mir damit sagen möchtest? Welches Bild meinst Du? Von welchem Artikel sprichst Du? Ohne diese Infos kann ich Dir nicht weiterhelfen? LG

Could you please undelete my photographs? Proof of license enclosed.

Hi there,

All of the photos that you have deleted have been uploaded to Flickr with the correct ShareAlike license. You can see the page in question here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/130476644@N02/

It would be great if you could therefore undelete the images so I can use them across Wikipedia. Many thanks,

Warren

Who is there? Who is Warren? -- Ies (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:DO-Zollern-II-IV 8584 1.JPG

Hello Ies. The first locomotive is the Arnold Jung : https://www.flickr.com/photos/34148515@N03/9078389068/ . The second behind is a fireless locomotive, but i do not know the builder.
Cordialement.Altona (talk) 21:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

La Gazette / L'Echo Le Régional photos

Hello Les, I'm the editor of La Gazette du Val d'Oise and L'Echo-Le Régional newspapers. So, I give to Commons wikimedia the right to use the first pages of these newspapers. Thanks for suspending censure.

Who is there? Who writes me without signature? -- Ies (talk) 13:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

	Hello, Ies. You have new messages at Omo Obatalá's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Re: File:South east Asia.svg

Aaaaaa, what a mistake. Will be corrected. Thank you very much.--Ma▀▄Ga 13:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaffeesahne 1 ies.jpg

File:Kaffeesahne 1 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

🎂CAKE🎂 07:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Birgu

Do you know what is the name of the street which leads from Fort Saint Angelo to the border with Cospicua? There are three categories, and I suspect they all refer to the same road: Ix-Xatt tal-Birgu (which you created in March 2014), Vittoriosa Waterfront (which you created last week) and Xatt il-Forn (which I created just now). On Google Earth, the whole street is known as "Xatt il-Forn" (see here), however the terms "Xatt il-Birgu" and "Vittoriosa Waterfront" both seem to be in use. What is you opinion regarding these categories? PS. I replied to your message on my talk page. --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 10:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google maps turned out to be unreliable in certain areas of Malta and I think it's unreliable in the current case, too. Actually I took an image of an "Ix-Xatt tal-Birgu" street sign and saw some more of them where Google maps indicates "Xatt il-Forn". My suspicion is that the latter was the old name for that steet and that it was renamed during the restauration works. To me there seem three street names in use at the west coast of Birgu:

from Fort St. Angelo south to the Maritime Museum: Ix-Xatt tal-Birgu,
west (also north and south) of the Freedom Memorial: Xatt ir-Rizq,
a footpath rather than a street further south to Café Bacino and the boundary: Vittoriosa Waterfront.

In Cospicua the footpath is continued

from the boundary south to Kazin tal-Banda San Gorg along to Fuq San l-Inkurunazzjoni in the former dock 1 area,
further south along to Ix-Xatt ta' Bormla (wrong as Ix-Xatt ta' Bormila in Google) directly at the former dock 1.

Btw. Google maps is also wrong in Senglea. Where Google indicates Ir - Rampa Ta' L - Isla is actually Triq is-Sur. The southern part of Google's Ix-Xatt Juan B. Azzopardi is actually Triq it-Tarzna (north of the Sheer Bastion) and Triq il-31 ta' Marzu (south of the Sheer Bastion). The latter belongs to Senglea and not to Cospicua as Google's boundary lines suggest. etc. etc. It's a rather unpleasant and time robbing work to cross-check that all. -- Ies (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could MaltaPost's postcode finder (which can be found here) be a used as a definitive source of the street names? The streets listed are:

"Xatt tal-Birgu" (including Fort St. Angelo, Café Bacino and Grand Harbour Marina (referring to Cottonera Marina?). The Wet Ditch would also be considered here since it's close to the fort)
"Xatt il-Forn" (including the Malta Maritime Museum. The Admiralty Gate would also be considered here since it's close to the museum)

The list does not include "Vittoriosa Waterfront" or "Xatt ir-Risq". For now, I've moved Fort St. Angelo back to Xatt tal-Birgu. What do you think regarding the other categories? --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, MaltaPost's postcode finder seems the most reliable source for inhabited streets. However, meanwhile I found two more sources for Xatt ir-Risq.

Here Times of Malta mentiones Xatt ir-Risq in the dock 1 area.
Here Malta Independent describes "Xatt ir-Risq stretching from the Freedom monument in Vittoriosa to the area below Cospicua’s belvedere, as part of the Dock 1 project".

I think as an inhabited area it's not listed in the postcode finder.

All in all we seem to have three names now.

"Xatt tal-Birgu",
"Xatt il-Forn", and
"Xatt ir-Rizq" for the recently reconstructed and inhabited street/footpath/belvedere from the Freedom monument south to dock 1 in Cospicua.

Do you agree?

Regarding the Cottonera Marina: All signs I saw there said "Grand Harbour Marina". I guess it was renamed by its new owner. See the Grand Harbour Marina website

-- Ies (talk) 06:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Cottonera/Grand Harbour Marina, sources from when it was being built use the name "Cottonera Marina" (eg. these sources from 2003 and 2004), so probably that was the original name. Now it seems that "Grand Harbour Marina" is used as you said, and I just renamed the category.

Regarding the names of the streets, I agree with you and think it should be as follows:

The section from Fort St. Angelo to the old treasury is known as Xatt tal-Birgu (subcategories Fort St. Angelo, Wet Ditch and Grand Harbour Marina)
the section from the Maritime Museum to Admiralty Gate is known as Xatt il-Forn (subcategories Malta Maritime Museum, Admiralty Gate and Grand Harbour Marina)
the section from the Freedom Monument to the border with Cospicua is known as Xatt ir-Risq (subcategories Freedom Monument, Bacino Café and Grand Harbour Marina - note that Bacino Café is listed on MaltaPost's postcode finder as in "Xatt tal-Birgu", but the area is clearly Xatt ir-Risq as per the Times of Malta/Malta Independent sources you found)

The marina is situated all along the entire creek, so I included it as a subcategory for all the three streets. I nominated the now empty Vittoriosa Waterfront category for deletion. I think that this is an informal name referring to all the three streets put together, especially the area of Xatt tal-Birgu and Xatt il-Forn. --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -- Ies (talk)

Zinc and galvanization

Regarding this, en.wikipedia says "Galvanization, or galvanisation, is the process of applying a protective zinc coating to steel or iron, to prevent rusting".
For this reason, I think it is appropriate to include "Zinc" in the categorization of "Galvanization".
What is your opinion about it? --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 02:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I got fooled by the similar German word "Galvanisation" what means electroplating. Thank you for paying attention. -- Ies (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:An Ambiguous Report About the End of the World poster.jpg

I noticed your speedy. They all have an OTRS from JAKUBISKO FILM EUROPE, SE. J e e 18:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files with OTRS

Hi, Do not request deletion for files which have a valid OTRS ticket. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Vogelpark Viernheim

Dear Ies, For my article "Vogelpark Viernheim", I now categorized all the photos used in the article except one - for that animal I could not find any latin name in internet, if I can find later I will ad. Thanks for the advise. Could you please take time to have a look again if everything is right now? This is my first article, I am not so skilled in internet topics, so I hope you understand this is very new to me. Der Super-Dickmann

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with this park and can't help. Better ask user:4028mdk09 who made Category:Vogelpark Viernheim and took most if not all imges there. -- Ies (talk) 09:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@user:Der Super-Dickmann: vermutlich suchst Du Category:Deutsches Lachshuhn? Ob es hierfür und für Haustierrassen überhaupt auch einen lateinischen Namen gibt, weiß ich nicht. --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC) PS. Falls Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich auf meiner Benutzerdiskussionsseite - dort gerne auch auf deutsch. [reply]

Bilder Skulpturenpark Schloss Gottorf

Hallo Ies oder Frank, vielen Dank für all die Skulpturenfotos. Einen großen Teil habe ich auf meiner Webseite eingestellt. Du findest sie mit dem direkten Link: http://www.zuzuku.de/msde/434.htm - Bitte prüfe, ob ich Dich regelkonform als Urheber eingesetzt habe. Schöne Grüße, User:Kamahele

Hallo Kamahele, da hast Du eine schöne Webseite gemacht. So gut aussehend hatte ich meine Bilder gar nicht in Erinnerung. Das Licht war beim Knipsen nicht immer optimal und manche Bilder hätte man zu einer anderen Tageszeit (nicht so im Schatten) sicher besser hingekriegt, aber ich hatte nicht die große Auswahl und beim Knipsen immer meine Frau "im Nacken". Die ist zwar meistens sehr geduldig mit mir, wurde aber hier doch etwas unruhig, als ich wirklich jede Skulptur mehrfach knipste.

Nun, so weit ich sehen kann ist alles regelkonform. Danke für den Link! Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Frank,

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skulpturenpark_Schloss_Gottorf ist fertig.

Deine Bilder sind sehr hilfreich, der Text allein wäre eine langweilige Auflistung gewesen.

Vielen Dank, User:Kamahele - Eberhard Hauff 18:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goch Asperden - Kloster Graefenthal 07 ies.jpg

Hello. The above file was the subject of a deletion request because the license plate could be read on the car at the right of the image. I have covered up the plate but otherwise not done anything to the photo. Unfortunately I have had to make your original version invisible to the public. Green Giant (talk) 14:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for solving the problem. -- Ies (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MARCEL THOMAS - SERGE GAINSBOURG.jpg et File:Étoiles du cinéma Français.jpg

Cette photo a été prise par Marcel THOMAS, avec l'autorisation de Serge GAINSBOURG. C'est pourquoi cette photo se trouve sur la page consacrée au photographe.

Pourquoi la supprime-t-on alors ?

Merci pour vos éclaircissements. Lestontonsflingueurs (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC) Lestontonsflingueurs 16 février 2015[reply]

I'm afraid my French is too bad to understand you. Please write in English (or German). -- Ies (talk)

He's saying that "this (meaning 'these') photo(s) have been taken by Marcel Thomas, with Serge G.'s authorisation. This is why this photo is in the page dedicated to the photograph." (just translating, don't know what yous are on about.) Basicdesign (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re. possible deletion

Hi there,

these pics that you listed are extracts of public government maps, in public domaine, available for free and without registration on the internet. Something like the cadastre, which itself is definitely copyleft - that at least I am 100% sure of. I am not savvy (euphemism) with the copyright business, but I've seen these maps copied for any and all sorts of uses (public, private, decent, indecent, etc) and as far as I know there's never been any claim, so there's likely no ground for any or else it would have cropped up by now. Plus, I have altered these maps by highlighting the river arms as this is the aim of these pics. Itou for the GR132. Here, that's all I know. If you still think it's an abuse, no prob, get rid of them. Wish you good evening, Basicdesign (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Addrock2.jpg deleted

Hi les !

The picture you 've marked as violation of copyright. I am a member of the band photo you dialed. How do I show that I am authorized to use the photo ?

FedexADD !

Please use our Open-source Ticket Request System. See Commons:OTRS. -- Ies (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke!

Vielen Dank für deine Kategorisierungen meiner Nordwalde-Bilder. Es sieht nach Handarbeit aus. Obwohl du ja auch schon lange dabei bist, möchte ich einen vorsichtigen Tipp geben: Du kennst die beiden Helferlein Cat-a-lot und Hotcat? Sie erleichtern derartige Arbeiten durchaus. --XRay ^talk 18:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, mea culpa

I've just copied a bulk of links and I didn't pay attention. So, I suggest the images listed at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Kornjaca be deleted immediately. There're enough good images anyway. I would delete them myself, but, I don't know how. Thanks.

Soll Dein Katschwachfug also so bleiben?

Siehe insbesondere hier!

Ich stelle fest, daß die Katstruktur für Artikelautoren, die den Bestand durchsuchen wollen, völlig untauglich ist. Und die meisten Nonsenskats hast Du selber angelegt. Und da Du vermutlich selber Dein "System" nicht verstehst, wird auch nichts gepflegt und das Chaos wird mit jedem hinzukommenden Bild von Dritten, insbesondere durch Nordenfans Bilderflut, größer.

Aber Du hast ja Rollbackrechte, die bei dir, wie man hier sieht, bestens aufgehoben sind, kein Mißbrauch zu erwarten ...

Prima Gemeinschaftsprojekt, die Commons. Wenn so die de-WP - in der Du dankenswerterweise seit Jahren nicht editierst - wäre, dann wären wirklich nur noch Ballerspieler da und die Artikel hätten entsprechendes Niveau. --Elop (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Um es noch einmal zu konkretisieren:

Ich halte von der Geographiekat auf Commons auf der Ortsebene rein gar nichts und würde sie entsprechend völlig entfernen.

Auf Artikelebene macht die Sinn, aber bei den Bildern kaum, da sie Sachen zusammenfaßt, die nicht zusammengehören!

Bei den Bildern wären Karten, Panoramen/Skylines, Gebäude, Veranstaltungen und ein paar andere sinnvolle Primärkats. Und nur mit sinnvollen Kats findet der Suchende das, wonach er gesucht hatte. --Elop (talk) 22:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bishop's Palace (Mdina)

Hi Ies, what building are you referring to as the "Bishop's Palace"? I think that the neo-Gothic building shown in most of the images is actually a private house, not the Bishop's Palace (see this source: "... and the English Neo-Gothic house in the main square built around the turn of the 20th century.")

There is an Archbishop's Palace in Mdina (pictured here) but it is located in Pjazza tal-Arċisqof adjacent to the cathedral.

What are your views on this? --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I made a mistake here. So as the "English Neo-Gothic house" is not the Archbishop's Palace - but still worth a category - how should we call and categorize it? -- Ies (talk) 07:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find a name for the house. I've renamed the category to No. 3, Misraħ San Pawl, the house number and the name of the square (Misraħ San Pawl and Pjazza San Pawl are both used). Some sources refer to the house as "Casa Gourgion" (see here and here), but I'm not convinced that this is its real name. On MEPA's map (see pg. 8 here), the building is simply referred to as "No. 3, Misrah San Pawl" (no. 48 on map), while "Gourgion Palace" is the building adjacent to it which corners with Villegaignon Street (no. 49 on map). MaltaPost's postcode finder does not give a house name when you enter no. 3, Misrah San Pawl either.--Xwejnusgozo (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs reply

Hi, Hreinn Gudlaugsson needs a reply. TherasTaneel (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I hope he understands our category system and is willing to adapt. -- Ies (talk) 19:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tiergartenstraße (Wuppertal)

Schaumal, die Bilder von der "Tiergartenstraße", das sollte Category:Freyastraße 7 (Wuppertal) sein, oder? --Atamari (talk) 10:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nee, die Bilder in Category:Tiergartenstraße (Wuppertal) sind tatsächlich in der Tiergartenstraße (bei Freyastraße 7 links um die Ecke) gemacht. Man könnte auch noch die Haus-Nr. 279/281 kategorisieren. Schaue mal bei File:Wuppertal - Tiergartenstraße 11 ies.jpg genau hin. -- Ies (talk) 14:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, dann sind noch mehr Häuser von diesem Häuseblock bemalt. Dann würde ich wirklich noch eine Kategorie zum Hausvorchlagen. Evtl. auch paintings ba Erika Nabel in Tiergartenstraße und paintings by Erika Nabel on Wupperwall (oder ähnlich). --Atamari (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Na ja, ich persönlich würde die Bilder von Erika Nagel lieber noch zusammenhalten. Noch ist es ja ganz übersichtlich. -- Ies (talk) 17:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:River wall of Wupper in Wuppertal -> Ufermauer der Wupper (in Wuppertal)
Category:Paintings on river wall of Wupper in Wuppertal by Erika Nagel Gemälde auf der Ufermauer [...] von Erika Nagel

Ist erst mal mein Vorschlag. --Atamari (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist besser als ich zuerst dachte. Von wegen Kategorien: Hast Du gelesen, was User:Elop weiter oben ("Soll Dein Katschwachfug also so bleiben?") schrieb? Er hat so seine ganz eigene Vorstellung davon, was sinnvolle Kategorien sind. Offenbar hat er nicht verstanden, dass Commons kein Teil der Deutschen Wikipedia und daher nicht dafür optimiert ist, er versteht das hierarchisch aufgebaute Kategorisierungssystem von Commons nicht, erkennt nicht die international angewandten Kategorisierungsstandards und gibt mir persönlich die Schuld für die für ihn unverständlichen Kategorien. Da weiß man nicht, ob man darüber lachen oder weinen soll. -- Ies (talk) 17:53, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin damit auch überhaupt nicht gleicher Meinung. Elop hat dort deutlich überreagiert. --Atamari (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinguinanlage im Zoo Wuppertal

Das eine Bild in Category:Große Pinguinanlage im Zoo Wuppertal zeigt, glaube ich die "alte" Pinguinanlage. --Atamari (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ja stimmt, habe ich wieder vereinzelt. -- Ies (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

à propos Djamel Dahou

Bonjour je voulais vous demander comment je peux avoir la license de ce fichier ? Djamel Dahou --YacineDZ (talk) 10:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid my French is too bad to understand you. Please write in English (or German). -- Ies (talk) 14:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hermannsdenkmal

Hallo, mit deiner Rotationsanforderung von File:Detmold - 2014-03-30 - Hermannsdenkmal (10).jpg bin ich nicht so recht zufrieden. Ich hatte das Bild absichtlich so gedreht, damit die Schrift auf dem Schwert gut lesbar ist - als Gegenstück zu File:Hermannsdenkmal-Schwert.jpg. --Magnus (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte es gut gemeint und das Schwert senkrecht gedreht, wie es gehalten wird. Wenn Du es aber absichtlich zur besseren Lesbarkeit waagerecht gedreht hast, spricht nichts dagegen, wenn Du es wieder zurück drehst. -- Ies (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malta - Senglea - Triq il-31 ta' Marzu 01 ies.jpg

File:Malta - Senglea - Triq il-31 ta' Marzu 01 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 23:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shoe brakes vs. Category:Tread brakes

Hallo,

I'm not a native English speaker, and it seems you're not either. So, this discussion may be pointless here, but here is the point: you created a Category:Shoe brakes a few years ago, I missed this existing category and created another one, Category:Tread brakes, today.

As the later is rather new, it would be easier to delete it, but I think it is accurate. For me, a shoe brake is a brake that has a shoe, and this is the case for tread brakes and drum brakes and some propeller shaft brakes. So, Would you mind if I re-categorise the media to Category:Tread brakes?

Should we then ask for the deletion of Category:Shoe brakes, or use it as a greater category enclosing Category:Tread brakes and Category:Drum brakes?

Grüsse

Cdang (talk) 08:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ies,

Do you have a particuliar opinion about the topic, or do you agree (or don't mind) if I recategorise ?

Cdang (talk) 09:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of street photography

Hi Ies Who come you nominate my street photography pictures for deletion? Have you ever read the definition of street photography? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_photography I do 100% street photography, I just take small details of the street/public space. Yes this is new, but still street photography. Kind Regards Mimizane

2015-03-14, 10:32‎, User:Mimizane Jr.

Category:Paintings in the Von-der-Heydt-Museum

Betr. User_talk:Ies/Archive_2009-1#Category:Paintings_in_the_Von-der-Heydt-Museum

... ich glaube, die temporäre Leihgabe ist nicht so gut. Ich glaube, es ist besser die Kat aufzulösen. Die drei Bilder ("Rembrandt, Rubens, Van Dyck-- Italiensehnsucht nordischer Barockmaler : Meisterwerke aus dem Museum der Bildenden Künste Budapest") könnte man in einer Ausstellungs-Kategorie machen, Ereignis von 1995. Interessanter ist zu kategorisieren was wirklich zur Sammlung von der Heydt gehört und nicht, was mal sechs Wochen im Haus hing. --Atamari (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

die Holländische Nähschule gehört doch zur Sammlung. --Atamari (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files « "Caribe" - Lisbon, 2004 » and « Sauvons la "Calypso" »

Hello,
I saw your messages about possibles copyrights violations for the files File:"Caribe" - Lisbon, 2004.jpg and File:Sauvons la "Calypso".JPG . For the first photo, i've the authorization of the owner and i send him a mail to ask him to send a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to confirm i've received his authorization to upload his photo on the website. For the second picture, i've make this montage from a picture free of rights (this one : File:La calypso, vue d'ensemble.JPG). Could you retired these possible copyrights violations banners please? Thank you in advance. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the first photo, unfortunately, there is neither any trace of evidence that you did what you wrote nor a visible likelihood that you will get that permission. For the second photo obviously Oliver BERNARD is the copyright holder. As the watermark is clearly visible I have to doubt your words. -- Ies (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
For the first photo, i can make a screenshot of the mail and send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org but i prefer when is the photograph who make to be sure he didn't change of advice. For the second photo, i'm not very gifted for derivated works. Could you please make the necessary changes to ccorrect this copyright troubles, because undeed the original photo (without writing) is from Olivier Bernard but it's me who had writed « Seules les missions imossibles réussissent. J.-Y. C. Sauons la "Calypso" » on the photo. So in this type of case, i don't really know who's the request owner. Thphotograph of the original photo, the person who had make changes or the two?
Thank you in advance. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 14:53, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't downgrade your images!

Hi, Michielverbeek, please don't downgrade your images! For instance in your images File:Duisburg, Seilscheibe der Schachtanlage Rheinpreussen foto3 2013-07-28 15.40.jpg and File:Duisburg, modern straatzicht1 in het centrum foto7 2013-07-28 15.12.jpg the now "warmer" but actually unnatural brown sky is a big change to the worse. If these images look better now for you please check your computer monitor! Greetings, -- Ies (Overleg)

Hi Ies! Thanks for your comment, also when it's criticism. This moment I am busy to upgrade my NRW-images and I realize I exaggerate in reducing the highlights. I have looked again to all those photos and I have made developed them again; new uploads will come very soon. I hope you like them and tastes are sometimes quiet different. Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Unnecessary borders

	Hello, Ies. You have new messages at Natalie-S's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Natalie-S (talk) 23:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maria im Schnee: Wuppertal>Ennepetal

Hallo, hast du de:Beyenburger Kapelle Maria Schnee (mit Löschantrag) gesehen? Das Ding liegt in Ennepetal (Wuppermitte ist Stadtgrenze). Die Änderungen an deinen Fotos siehst du wahrscheinlich auf der Beobachtungsliste. Kategorien und Beschreibungen sind schon alle korrigiert. Jetzt sind noch 2 Punkte offen: die Ortsangaben in den Dateinamen und eventuell die Einbindung auf deinen Städte-Unterseiten. Dateiverschiebungen könnt ich machen. Vorne steht bei deinen Bildern überall "Wuppertal Beyenburg" dran, korrekt wäre zB "Ennepetal Schemm" oder auch nur "Ennepetal". Hast du einen Wunsch dazu? Holger1959 (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info. Da hatte auch ich nicht aufgepasst und mich durch die Nähe zu Beyenburg irreführen lassen. Wenn Du verschiebst, wäre "Ennepetal Schemm" recht, aber sooo wichtig ist mir das nicht. Danke für Deine Hilfe, ich komme derzeit leider nur sporadisch und kurzzeitig ins Netz. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verschiebungen sind jetzt erledigt. Da [1] kannst du noch selbst rumräumen, das müssten alle Bilder sein. Holger1959 (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! -- Ies (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for the excellent coverage of German cities! Ijon (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

plant identification

Hello, I would be happy if you check if you can help in this conversation. I remember that you understand these issues Chenspec (talk) 19:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grapsus_adscensionis_in_Tenerife

Grapsus adscensionis in Tenerife has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Leyo 17:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caminos- Lisbet Fernández - Fuerteventura.jpg

Vielleicht liegt es nur daran, dass ich 2 Wochen in einem Hotel in der Nähe war und daher den richtigen Augenblick besser erwischen konnte. Aber Du hast recht, nicht alle Tage waren eitel Sonnenschein. Viele Grüße --Llez (talk) 15:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]