User talk:Hjajajsbbxb12
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Hi, Do not do that. And do not create a speedy deletion request. You can comment in the DR, still open. Yann (talk) 19:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I won't do that again, but can you delete the Barn Dance file, because that short is not Public Domain yet, and protect it so it won't be created until January 1, 2025, because the short was created in 1929, not 1928 or earlier, and according to this source: the short's copyright was renewed on December 10, 1956[1] Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- The short is copyrighted until 2025, but the poster is essentially the same as the 1928 one for Gallopin Gaucho, so there's no new copyright for it. Bedivere (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
File:SML Movie- Cody Goes To Kindergarten! Part 2.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Bedivere (talk) 01:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
File:The N 2002 prelaunch logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Bedivere (talk) 00:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- This logo is in the Public Domain, because it is too simple to be a copyrighted work, despite the hand in the logo. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is not too simple. Bedivere (talk) 01:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I know that. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 01:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is not too simple. Bedivere (talk) 01:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Hjajajsbbxb12.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
--Bedivere (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
Yours sincerely, Bedivere (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a duration of one week
[edit]You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of one week for the following reason: uploading duplicate files and copyright violations despite warnings, and general disruptive behavior.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.
|
--Bedivere (talk) 04:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lightstorm Entertainment 1994 logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Bedivere (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- As the blocking admin, I am not taking this unblock request. However, I would like to point out this discussion they brought to my talk page on the English Wikipedia. I also think that asking for an unblock or to shorten to a fixed term (proposed by the blocked user themselves) is not the greatest thing to do, by making void promises as they have also previously felt "sorry" for uploading non-free files on Commons, only to return to do it again, just what they promised not to do again, and exactly what they've posted on the unblock request itself. "Para muestra un botón", as we say in Spanish for an obvious example: see previous threads and my own talk page here and on the English Wikipedia, where they have resorted too to their disruptive behavior. I strongly oppose unblocking this user. --Bedivere (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
You promise not to upload copyright violations more, but how will you make difference between copyrighted and non-copyrighted files? Also please give a specific example about what will you upload when unblocked. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I will only upload Public Domain works on commons, Mostly works that were either created before 1929 or the author has been dead for more than 70 years. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 11:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I fail to see how this block is justified. Hjajajsbbxb12 has eight deleted files, and of those files five were deleted as "exact or scaled-down duplicate" (File:Download (8).svg, File:Disney XD 2009 logo.svg, File:Disnet XD 2009 logo.svg, File:The Home Depot - 1989.svg, File:Netflix logo (3).svg) and were indeed {{PD-textlogo}} otherwise. An indefinite block for "Uploading unfree files after warnings: + disruptive behaviour amounting to vandalism" for only three copyvios (that, unlike many copyvios, were at least sourced and attributed rather than purporting a bogus self claim) is inappropriate--as was, frankly, the first block (a week for two copyvios?) Where are the diffs for "disruptive behaviour amounting to vandalism"? @Bedivere: how do you reconcile this block with COM:BP ("As blocks are preventative rather than punitive, use a block duration that is proportional to the time likely needed for the user to familiarize themselves with relevant policies and adjust their behaviour") and COM:AGF? At most this is a username issue ("Usernames like 'Dasdpoieqdmcoiaq' that are random characters, [...], or confusing for other reasons can be blocked.") Эlcobbola talk 14:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to either be unblocked or my blocked shortened to double the time of the first block, which is also known as two weeks. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola More than the copyright violations issue (which they violated immediately after their first block) I proceeded to block indefinitely because I have followed the user here and on the English Wikipedia and found their behavior to be disruptive. I would agree a shorter block could be better but the unblocking admin or whoever reduces the block time should follow closely this user's behavior. Bedivere (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere: You've not answered my questions. Where are the diffs for "disruptive behaviour amounting to vandalism" on the Commons? We do not sanction users on the Commons for actions on sister projects. How do you reconcile this indefinite block (for a mere three copyvios) with COM:BP and COM:AGF? Эlcobbola talk 18:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- 11 March 2024 Tags for speedy deletion a perfectly PD poster as "fair use" reiterating to death that the short is not in the public domain, but it is the poster that they are requesting deletion of, not the short, which has a different copyright. The paradox is that they later uploaded a whole video from YouTube that is evidently copyrighted because "I thought the copyright holder allows anybody to use it". When you say we do not sanction users on the Commons for actions on sister projects, I agree with that, but it's been this user who's brought their problems from here over there. Afterwards they uploaded an evidently copyrighted logo as they claimed "This logo is in the Public Domain, because it is too simple to be a copyrighted work, despite the hand in the logo". They were given a last warning but they continued to upload logos which weren't theirs but they claimed as their own. Not only that, they knowingly duplicated SVG files, making small changes in their code (not visible) in order to upload a version of their "own". That was what led to their first block. Their second, indefinite block came after they uploaded this copyrighted logo. Bedivere (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I promise that I will not upload that copyriggted logo on commons ever again. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 20:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I can explain It, the difference between copyrighted and non-copyrighted files is that non-copyrighted files are also known as Public Domain material, the work is in the Public Domain either because it's copyright expired, because it was published in the United States before 1929, or the author died before 1954, the work is ineligible for copyright, the work's copyright wasn't renewed within the first 28 years, if the work is from before 1964, or it didn't have a copyright notice before 1978, copyrighted works are fair use, and earliest date a work currently can be copyrighted in the United States is on January 1, 1929, Copyrighted/Fair Use material is not allowed on commons, and this transition of copyrighted works into the Public Domain happens each year on January 1st, January 1st is also known as Public Domain Day, and I will only upload Public Domain material, when I'm unblocked. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- and Public Domain means the work is not protected by copyright. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 19:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can explain It, the difference between copyrighted and non-copyrighted files is that non-copyrighted files are also known as Public Domain material, the work is in the Public Domain either because it's copyright expired, because it was published in the United States before 1929, or the author died before 1954, the work is ineligible for copyright, the work's copyright wasn't renewed within the first 28 years, if the work is from before 1964, or it didn't have a copyright notice before 1978, copyrighted works are fair use, and earliest date a work currently can be copyrighted in the United States is on January 1, 1929, Copyrighted/Fair Use material is not allowed on commons, and this transition of copyrighted works into the Public Domain happens each year on January 1st, January 1st is also known as Public Domain Day, and I will only upload Public Domain material, when I'm unblocked. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- I promise that I will not upload that copyriggted logo on commons ever again. Hjajajsbbxb12 (talk) 20:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- 11 March 2024 Tags for speedy deletion a perfectly PD poster as "fair use" reiterating to death that the short is not in the public domain, but it is the poster that they are requesting deletion of, not the short, which has a different copyright. The paradox is that they later uploaded a whole video from YouTube that is evidently copyrighted because "I thought the copyright holder allows anybody to use it". When you say we do not sanction users on the Commons for actions on sister projects, I agree with that, but it's been this user who's brought their problems from here over there. Afterwards they uploaded an evidently copyrighted logo as they claimed "This logo is in the Public Domain, because it is too simple to be a copyrighted work, despite the hand in the logo". They were given a last warning but they continued to upload logos which weren't theirs but they claimed as their own. Not only that, they knowingly duplicated SVG files, making small changes in their code (not visible) in order to upload a version of their "own". That was what led to their first block. Their second, indefinite block came after they uploaded this copyrighted logo. Bedivere (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Bedivere: You've not answered my questions. Where are the diffs for "disruptive behaviour amounting to vandalism" on the Commons? We do not sanction users on the Commons for actions on sister projects. How do you reconcile this indefinite block (for a mere three copyvios) with COM:BP and COM:AGF? Эlcobbola talk 18:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently uploading media that is in violation of Commons' licensing policy, despite our warnings not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See block log.
(toolbox: contributions • page moves)
|
--Bedivere (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- ↑ (in English) (1956) Catalog of Copyright Entries, Library of Congress