User talk:DieBuche/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Description missing

[edit]

Hallo DieBuche. Bei Dateien mit ORTS-Vorlage, die von de-WP übertragen wurden, fehlt die Beschreibung standardmässig. Diese ist wohl meist im Datei-Logbuch oder in den gelöschten Versionen vorhanden. Kannst du die betreffenden Dateien erfassen oder die Beschreibung sogar automatisch nachtragen? --Leyo 14:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erfassen müsste gehen, nachtragen vielleicht. Hast du mal ein Beispiel dafür?--DieBuche (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Beispiel: File:Festina F16184 4.jpg --Leyo 16:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ja das geht. Ich warte erstmal noch bis der Bot die restlichen 4000 Dateien getaggt hat (ca. 20h); dann mache ich einen Querschnitt aus Cat:Description missing & OTRS und packe bei allen die aus de.wiki kommen die Beschreibung aus dem upload log rein. Weißt du ob der dieser ComonsHelper bug schon gefixt ist?--DieBuche (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Und hast du das auch bei anderen Sprachen gesehen, wenn ja kann ich die ja gleich mitbehandeln--DieBuche (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vor wenigen Tagen war der Bug jedenfalls noch nicht gefixt (siehe auch hier).
Bei anderen Sprachen ist mir dies nicht bekannt. --Leyo 19:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Zufällig eines aus en.wiki gefunden. Hat noch nichtmal ein OTRS: [1]--DieBuche (talk) 22:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Guck, es funktioniert [2]! Das Problem tritt übrigens bei allen Sprachen (ich hab bis jetzt de, en, ru, ka, uk geshen) und scheint auch ohne OTRS aufzutreten. --DieBuche (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gut gemacht! OK, aber mit OTRS tritt es halt einfach sehr „zuverlässig“ auf. --Leyo 18:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Die meisten dürften erledigt sein. Von 8500 überprüften Bildern waren 209 von dem Problem betroffen.--DieBuche (talk) 20:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maelstrom screenshot.png

[edit]

kuckemal - meinst Du, das passt nu so?--Biktora (talk) 19:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, Danke --DieBuche (talk) 19:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catholic Church in Siebiež.jpg

[edit]

Sorry, but you are wrong about this [3]. The Polish name is Siebież, not Siebiež. Siebiež is Belarusian Lacinka, but it's a town in Russia (and was in Russia when the picture was taken as well) and has never been a part of Belarus. There are no reasons not to name this photo by using the official English name of the town Sebezh. — Gleb Borisov (talk) 03:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but what does that mean [4][5]? You seem to have ignored my first message concerning the name of Sebezh. The case with Velizh is analogical. This is a town in Russia and has never been a part of Belarus, in addition this photo has been taken, when it was a part of Russia as well. And I repeat, these names are not written in Polish, but in Belarusian Latin alphabet. Vialiž is not even in the official Belarusian, but in Taraškevica orthography. So, please, don't do such actions any more, and rename these files, using their official English names according to the Russian language. Gleb Borisov (talk) 14:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that I oversaw your first comment. I thought that Siebiež were the polish name & according to the renaming rules, changing the language is not a valid reason. Since you make a reasonable case, consider these files renamed.--DieBuche (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you in advance. — Gleb Borisov (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Did I get all? I'm not sure--DieBuche (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, what do you mean?
If you have time, please, rename the following files as well:
— Gleb Borisov (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Botflag?

[edit]

Hi, you bot seems to operate without a botflag? So its edits all show up in my watchlist, even though bot edits should be hidden. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I applied for one now Commons:Bots/Requests/DieBucheBot --DieBuche (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Could you suspend your bot until you have it? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done--DieBuche (talk) 10:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What about getting autopatrolled right in the meantime? --Leyo 18:49, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SVG fixing

[edit]

Thank you for the SVG problem fixing in my File:Gobian Altai topography.svg image! Can you tell me what is possible to do to prevent this kind of problem in future? If i will edit this image (I will!) can I fix this problem? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CorelDraw often outputs incorrect svgs. In most cases, opening the file with inkscape & resaving as "optimized svg" gets rid of those problems --DieBuche (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin's noticeboard

[edit]

You are mentioned here here, please share your thoughts. Thanks, ZooFari 00:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note--DieBuche (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Description missing

[edit]

Many of images which was tagged as "Description missing" by user:DieBucheBot has an appropriately descriptive name. I think, the bot should have as the default treatment to copy the image name to the "description" field, the second treatment to copy description from some Wikipedia article where is the image used (it would be diffucult to pre-set) and only the third treatment to insert {{Description missing}}. --ŠJů (talk) 01:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was just the first step to get those images into the right category. Next one is the bot adding descriptions previously lost due to a bug by commonshelper, for example here. Afterwords I might try to fetch descriptions from other wikis using What is that written by magnus.--DieBuche (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder entfernen

[edit]

Hallo, könntest du bitte folgende Bilder löschen?: Bild1 Bild2 Wäre schön... --Serv (talk) 18:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fühl ich mich geehrt, dass du dachtest ich sei ein admin. Ich hab ein speedy draufgepackt, müsste bald weg sein :)--DieBuche (talk) 20:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sagen wir's so, du solltest eigtl. einer sein. ;) abf «Cabale!» 10:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dü könntest...

[edit]

...diese netten kleinen Knöpfchen doch eigtl. ganz gut gebrauchen, oder? Soll ich dich 'mal vorschlagen? Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 10:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja gerne, hat ich auch schon drüber nachgedacht--DieBuche (talk) 10:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dann viel Erfolg. :) Stimme bitte nochmal hier zu. Danke. abf «Cabale!» 10:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recompression

[edit]

OK. It was not my intention to recompress the photos. It was a "private iniciative" of my new computer. I observed the problem after the time I had uploaded some photos and bot signed it with "size not found". Finnaly I found the way to upload without recompression. Regards Electron <Talk?> 07:34, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks. Just wanted to make sure to let u know.--DieBuche (talk) 07:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Admin

[edit]

Thanks for your support.       Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:King_Abdullah_Economic_City_seaside.tif

[edit]

DieBuche, Gutentag. Please see my response to your approval of deletion request for this image at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:King_Abdullah_Economic_City_seaside.tif

I wish to retain the image for the reasons provided. Thank you. MykjosephMykjoseph (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I answered you at the deletion request. Please follow the steps laid out there--DieBuche (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License reviewer

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you have importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js') in your monobook.js or vector.js. The License cv tab has a new function, please see the documentation for configuration or report errors in a new section on that page. Thank you, ZooFari 22:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the note--DieBuche (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caucasus region Ovest.jpg

[edit]

Please do not vandalize other user's uploads as you did to File:Caucasus region Ovest.jpg. The file was clearly marked that the uploader wanted a border on the image. Please see the file history and links to the file. -Nard the Bard 01:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To honest, I fail to see how this is "vandalizing". On commons there is a general consent to avoid images having borders, watermarks or other elements which solely distract from their content etc. The other images in Category:Images_with_intentional_borders are all images which have a border either out of their historical contect, for example File:K._Malewich_Black_Square_1913.jpg, or are only used on personal user pages such as File:Gujoh2.JPG. I can't see how a border on this image is any beneficial, and if you look at the file history, I was not the first one to think that. The file is not even the user "own" creation, where such a stylistic device might be more easily accepted, but just taken from here. If you want to challenge common policies, please take it to COM:VP--DieBuche (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gdańsk Town Hall about 1860.jpg

[edit]

Dear friend.

In Gdansk are as many as four town halls. Four! Above average. The need to change the name to avoid confusion. Only one word: "Main". Only one word: "Main". --Starscream (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't just state that as a reason for the rename, would have avoided any confusion. moved--DieBuche (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm here for four years. I've never had to justify in very similar situations. You do not need Commonsdelinker. This picture is not used anywhere outside the Commons. So, please join the work. Greetings. --Starscream (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

DieBuche, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

— Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 09:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Admin! abf «Cabale!» 13:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Happy Admin! ;) abf «Cabale!» 13:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, das ist ja ein hübscher button ;)--DieBuche (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for renaming my file

[edit]

You renamed my file "Jussieu Antoine de.jpg" into "Jussieu Antoine Laurent.jpg". I asked for the renaming of this file on May 18, so I'm glad at last someone took notice. But when I created the tag, I asked for the file to be renamed into "Jussieu Antoine Laurent de.jpg". It's not quite clear to me but I guess you misread the tag and omitted the " de" in the new name. Would you be able to correct that? Meanwhile I asked for two other files, derived from the same picture, to be renamed too, on the same date. Can you see if you can find "Jussieu Antoine de cropped.jpg" and "Jussieu Antoine de medaillon.jpg" and rename them according to the tag included? And if these questions bother you, can you tell me how I could get the appropriate rights to rename my files myself because it certainly bothers me if it takes about two weeks before my applications for renaming files are taken into consideration and then only in part. - Wikiklaas (talk) 20:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i mistook the de as a suffix for "german"; I'll rename those later. You can apply here Commons:Requests for rights‎--DieBuche (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
all done. I moved the first name to the front though, since this is de facto standard on commons--DieBuche (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Antonelli

[edit]

You delected that screenshot in PD-Italy , please stop doing that, there's a discussion here [6]. MachoCarioca (talk) 22:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wasn't aware of that discussion, I see you changed the others to normal deletes. I'll undelete if there's a consensus that this is a valid tag--DieBuche (talk) 22:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

radialGradient

[edit]

Thanks for the help on the radialGradient issue. Could you talk more details about the solution you did? Thank you in advance. --百楽兎 (talk) 00:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File mover

[edit]

Thank you, I see now. May I ask one question? If there are links on file, but they are just one or two, may I change image names by myself, or it is necessary to give command to commons delinker? Regards, --Gaeser (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If there are just a few or even no links to the image, you can of course change them manually. It just gets tiresome if the image is widely used--DieBuche (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank's for answers! --Gaeser (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

moved pictures

[edit]

Hallo, habe gesehen, du hast ein "clean up" beim delinker gemacht. Dort waren die file move requests von mir auch eingetragten und scheints abgearbeitet, aber - bei keinem der von mir verschobenen Bilder finde ich eine Nutzung, weder auf Commons noch in den globalen wikis ??? Vor dem Löschen sollte doch genau DAS der Commons Delinker erledigen oder habe ich da was missverstanden?. P.S. auch eine manuelle Nachsuche mit dem Reiter "Nutzung" brachte keine Ergebnisse, der Cache kann also nicht schuld sein. Gruß, NobbiP 18:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

der CD war gestern den ganzen Tag abgestürtzt, deswegen ist er jetzt immer noch ein paar Stunden hinterher. die logs sind hier; grad hat er ein Bild getausch was ich vor ca. 4 stunden eingetragen hab.--DieBuche (talk) 18:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Info, war nur verwundert, dass die "Aufträge" von den "Commands" Seiten weg waren, dachte die würden erst gelöscht, wenn die Aufträge auch ausgeführt wurden. Schönen Abend - und noch'n Glückwunsch zum Admin (einer mehr den wir einfachen User ärgern können ;-) ). NobbiP 18:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot and File:ADM Gary Roughead CNO.jpg

[edit]

Even if the new description might be better than the original {{En}} one, would you check why imported them here? Now there are two {{En}} versions. -- User:Docu at 15:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DieBucheBot edit summary

[edit]

I still think it could be helpful if it would list at least part of the imported description in the edit summary. -- User:Docu at 15:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, I think the result is excellent. I wonder if it wouldn't be worth doing the same to add descriptions in languages we don't have yet. -- User:Docu at 15:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I stopped the bot for now & will do the following changes to the code later on: 1. Check for existing languages & don't add another one of it. 2. Ignore descriptions below a certain character limit (I saw a few cases where the whole description was
English: 1.
What summary do you think would be better:
  1. Bot: Adding automatically fetched description for en, fr, de
  2. Bot: Adding automatically fetched description: {{es|Buzón de correos, en color amarillo, en Alcalá la Real, Jaén, Es... (cutoff at 70 characters)

--DieBuche (talk) 17:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I'd add as much of the description text as possible (possibly en if available). +Maybe a count of the number of languages. -- User:Docu at 11:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please excuse that I didn't get to reply earlier.
The current version (Bot: Adding automatically created description for en, es, pt, ro; minor fixes) is fine too.
Excellent idea. -- User:Docu at 11:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing

[edit]

Hallo! Weil du schon an einem der Bilder dran warst: Saber68 betreibt ganz massiv Flickr washing. Ich habe den fraglichen Account erstmal hier ergänzt, ggf. sollten die anderen Bilder auch gelöscht werden. Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ein paar konnte ich retten, da sie vor 1987 in Algerien aufgenommen wurden, zwei offensichtliche vios hab ich gelöscht. Beim Rest ist nicht sicher dass das Bild in Algerien gemacht wurde, deswegen tendenziell auch -> löschen--DieBuche (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mulligans.png

[edit]

I answered to you in Deletion requests. --Diecizerouno (talk) 20:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?

[edit]

http://toolserver.org/~delinker/index.php?image=Sir_Edwin_Landseer._Windsor_Castle_in_Modern_Times._1841-1845.jpg Multichill (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tschuldigung, kA wie das passiert ist. Die Nutzungen sind wieder hergestellt, ich bin zur Sicherheit nochmal die Logs meiner dupe-löschungen durchgegangen, so was gab es aber zum Glück nicht nochmal--DieBuche (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Multichill (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:Gadget-QPreview.js

[edit]

Ich nehme an, deine kürzlichen Edits an MediaWiki:Gadget-QPreview.js sind für mein Problem verantwortlich, daher die Frage an dich: Bisher war die schnelle Vorschau immer ein zusätzlicher Button, den man alternativ zur normalen Vorschau benutzen kann. Jetzt gibt es nur noch einen Button und der liefert immer die schnelle Vorschau. Ich fand es immer sehr angenehm, dass ich die Wahl hatte, denn bei der schnellen Vorschau besteht die Gefahr, dass, wenn man einem Link folgt und dann den Zurück-Button des Browsers klickt, die Änderungen verloren gehen (normalerweise merkt Firefox sich alle Änderungen, aber leider nicht immer). Mit der normalen Vorschau kann man 100%ig sicher sein, dass nichts mehr verloren geht. Wäre schön, wenn man das alte Verhalten mit zwei Buttons wiederherstellen könnte. --Slomox (talk) 15:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, kein problem. Ich bau noch die Option eines separaten Buttons wieder ein--DieBuche (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fertig. Du musst wahrscheinlich deinen browser cache leeren. Für den separaten button packe "separateQPreviewbutton=true;" in dein vector.js oder monobook.js--DieBuche (talk) 13:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Was für eine Warnung auf Webkit-Browsern? addToolLink funktioniert auch vernünftig in den alten, nicht Portlet-basierten Skins. Statt einfach zu ersetzen, würde ich also eher versuchen, addToolLink so anzupassen, dass keine Warnung mehr ausgelöst wird. Lupo 06:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wieder das alte Ding, das die Funktion aufgerufen wird bevor sie geladen ist...Vielleicht wären hier die gleichen ifs und timeouts wie bei Quickmod sinnvoll.
Übrigens, ich hab mal ein bisschen rumgeschaut, und dies gefunden. Er benutzt die API, um die Vorlagen auf die Seite zu packen, muss daher nicht mehrere tabs öffnen und scih mit dem anderen zeug rumschlagen etc. Ich hab sein script ein bisschen hier angepasst. Grüße --DieBuche (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template replacement

[edit]

Hello. For your information. The fact that you replaced some templates, which was a good move, such as in Info:USS_Yorktown_(CV-5), caused a number of info: galleries to be no longer categorized as you can see in Special:UncategorizedPages. --Foroa (talk) 15:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. The template now categorizes into Info pages & if existing into a category of the same name. Obviously the pages will stay in Special:UncategorizedPages until the cache is cleared--DieBuche (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I am somewhat surprised not to see the info:xxx as an item in the categories, but not sure if this is really important. --Foroa (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Reset indent for another point) I noticed that after category moves, you tend to blank categories. Some categories should have a redirect after a move, others (blatant errors, common in/of/from mistakes, plural errors) are to be deleted with preferably an edit summary stating where the category has been moved to. Blanking a category or a page makes that the category appears several days later in Special:UncategorizedCategories or Special:UncategorizedPages which we try to keep as empty as possible (takes several hours per week), but requires significant work as we have to analyse each case if it concerns vandalisme, mistakes, beginners work (that may need assistance) or just a plain categorisation problem. So following the standard procedure saves us all unnecessary work and as a courtesy to the creators, the edit summary tells where the category has been moved to. Thank you and keep up the good work. --Foroa (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's because Info: is not an official namespace...The blankings, I just hadn't got around on deleting/redirecting the pages after I put the move request on Delinkers commands--DieBuche (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: Yeah, that's weird. --DieBuche (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kanagawa prefecture

[edit]

Prefecture is supposed to be capitalized. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 17:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? All the sub-cats have lowercaps.--DieBuche (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The subcats were made wrong, so I am trying to fix them. I am also trying to fix them for all prefectures too. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When looking in Category:Kanagawa Prefecture and Category:Prefectures of Japan all prefectures (generic terms such as the cantons in Switzerland) are not capitalised. --Foroa (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But when we use it in general English, Foo Prefecture and Blah Canton are capitalized, but not sure why for the cats they are not. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In general, in English title cases are mixed up with proper nouns. Prefecture or canton are not necessarily part of the original name, it can be considered as a qualifier. I hardly find articles on the en:wikipedia that are consistent in that aspect. While, normally, you should write the Rhone valley (lower case v) and Silicon Valley (capital V), while referring in the text to the valley in the first case, Valley in the second. In practise, it get all mixed up. Both positions are arguable, but what is important is that the use of the capitals is consistent across the country, which is the case in Japan and Switzerland. --Foroa (talk) 06:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For Japan, I would like to use capitals. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bildbeschreibung von la.wikipedia holen

[edit]

Hallo DieBuche, wenn dein Bot die Bildbeschreibung von la.wikipedia holt, sollte er {{imago sine descriptione}} besser ignorieren, denn das ist das Gegenteil von einer Bildbeschreibung ;-) Ich habe daher diesen Edit rückgängig gemacht. Grüße, --UV (talk) 21:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Der edit war wirklich ein bisschen sinnfrei. Danke für den Hinweis, ich bau ne Ausnahme ein--DieBuche (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot: Beschreibungskäse

[edit]

ist das: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/w/index.php?title=File:Druidenstein_2010-2.jpg&curid=10458516&diff=40295152&oldid=39837466 - Das ist mein Name und sicher nicht die Beschreibung. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auch das hier: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/w/index.php?title=File:Earthworm_on_earth_-_heart.jpg&curid=9918071&diff=40296129&oldid=37251358 Der Bot sollte nicht einfach blind die erstbeste Beschreibung aus Bilduntertiteln übernehmen. --Saibo (Δ) 00:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Der zweite Fall sollte nicht mehr passieren, ich hatte bereits zwar bereits Beschreibungen unter 5 Zeichen aussortiert, das wurde aber nur ausgeführt wenn die Bilder nicht in Gallerien waren. Ist jetzt aber gefixt, sry. Beim ersten kann ich leider nicht soviel machen. Ich könnte natürlich die min Länge erhöhen, würde damit aber auch mehr korrekte Beschreibung, die besonders in Asiatischen Sprachen wenige Zeichen einnehmen können, aussortieren. Bei 60.000 analysierten Dateien ist leider unvermeidbar, dass ab und zu auch unbrauchbares rauskommt--DieBuche (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Klar, ich wollte dich nur darauf hinweisen. Wenn es nicht einfach besser geht, dann ist es okay so. Kannst vielleicht die de:WP:Fotowerkstatt vom Scannen ausnehmen? Vielleicht auch andere oder alle Projektseiten?! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ist passiert. Genauso wie die Englische Version davon. Ich werd mal die nächste Zeit die Beschreibungen aus Projektseite im Log markieren und bei Bedarf ganz rausnehmen.--DieBuche (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

See User talk:Fetchcomms,  fetchcomms☛ 20:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sperrdauer

[edit]

Ich weiß, es gibt keine Richtlinien dazu und oft neigt man dazu, bei Sachen die man einfach als zu unverschämt empfindet lange Sperren zu verhängen. Bring nach meiner Erfahrung nichts:

  • URVs von neuen Benutzern sind (leider) an der Tagesordnung, wenn richtige Quelle angegeben ist kann ichs ja noch verstehen, aber diese falschen Uploads als "own work" verstehe ich auch nicht. Es ist nunmal so. Wenn ein neuer Benutzer der auf keinem Projekt viele Edits hat so aggiert dann sperr 1 oder 3 Tage. Länger bringt nichts da nach einem Tag der Autoblock (Sperrung der zuletzt verwendeten IP) ausläuft und er sich einen neuen Account anlegen wird, dann haben wir die Sockenpuppe und die Sucherei nach der Quelle des unfreien Bildes geht von vorne los.
  • Wenn der neue Benutzer die Uploads wiederholt dann sperren, als Eskalationsschritte ruhig eine Woche und als drittes dann indefinite, notfalls schneller mit {{Copyviouploadindefblock}}.
  • Wenn der Benutzer auf einem anderen Projekt etabliert ist vorsichtiger handeln, wenn er z.B. auf en.wp ist wird er sonst seine Bilder dort hochlade und das Problem ist nur verlagert. Monatssperren oder 1/2-1 Jahressperren bringen nur bei solchen Benutzern was und auch nur nach einer Aussprache die nicht zur Einsicht geführt hat.

Mir war User:박미례 aufgefallen, 6 Monate halte ich für falsch. Hätte ich dann gleich (1) indefinite mit copyviouploadindefblock gelöst und, da auch die verbleibenden 4 Bilder doch recht verdächtig sind, die verbleibenden Bilder gelöscht oder (2) mit {{End of copyvios}} belassen, der Benutzer wird wahrscheinlich eh nicht mehr aktiv. --Martin H. (talk) 01:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, sechs Monate ist nichts halbes und nichts ganzes. Ich hebe mal die Sperre auf (+{{End of copyvios}}), wenn er jemals wieder aktiv sein sollte, ist er/sie dann wenigstens einfacher erkennbar. Die restlichen Bilder kamen mir erst ein bisschen weniger suspekt vor, aber jetzt wo ich sehe, dass er/sie als Author einen User:PMR angibt, welcher noch nie irgendwo ein Bild hochgeladen hat ( http://toolserver.org/%7Evvv/sulutil.php?rights=1&user=PMR ), werde ich die wahrscheinlich auch löschen. Danke für den Hinweis --DieBuche (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ist mir auch aufgefallen und fand ich komisch, Unterstützung also dafür. --Martin H. (talk) 11:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kleiner Bug

[edit]

Hier hat dein Bot das „d“ in ein „D“ geändert, was zu einem Fehler führte. --Leyo 14:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis, Ich hab gleich das Template so verändert [7], dass es wie {{Information}} die Parameter unabhängig von Groß/Kleinschreibung akzeptiert. --DieBuche (talk) 14:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gtk-dialog-question-2.svg

[edit]

Hi DieBuche, Can you explain why you uploaded the duplicate ? –Krinkletalk 19:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly to create a "normal" unprotected version of the icon, independent of the one which is protected since it is widely used in the Mediawiki messages. --DieBuche (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DieBuche/Archive_2&oldid=41920310"