User talk:DeFacto/Valued Image Promotions 2015

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leyland Cruiser trucks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I agree with Spurzem: photo has some quality issues, nevertheless for me best in scope (truck is only object seen on photo, most details)
 Comment No good quality. There is not enough contrast between the roof of the track and the sky. Further I don't like this kind of deleting lisens plate. May be that it is a rare image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for the comments. What would be a better technique to hide the number plate? DeFacto (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Badge of Thames, Ford's UK commercial vehicle brand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mini Clubman SRV4 Safety Research Vehicle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Laurence's Church Tower, King's Newnham, UK.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The very first Morris Mini (621 AOK).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Badge of Wolseley Motors, a British motor car marque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Badge of the Donald Healey Motor Company, a British motor car marque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Crooked House of Windsor viewed from the south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Could you provide a copy with higher resolution? --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, done as requested @Palauenc05: . DeFacto (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
   Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Risøy viewed through the Risøybroa (Risøy bridge) from the north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Line-up of Minis at the 2006 Issigonis centenary rally.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, modified the scope to include the event. DeFacto (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Saint Carannog in Llangrannog, Wales.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This image could be placed on an encyclopedia. Some article on this saint have no illustration. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment it's now added to the French article Saint Caradec. DeFacto (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

•  CommentA very good image, but possibly the wrong category has been highlighted in the scope - I suggest that scope should be linked to ":Category:Saint Carantoc" rather than to ":Category:Llangrannog". If you are using the Welsh form of the name in your description, it might be appropriate to also give the English form or, if you can manage it, give the description in both English and Welsh. (An on-line English Welsh dictionary suggests that "Cerflun o Sant Carannog yn Llangrannog, Cymru" might be appropriate, but I am unable to comment about the quality of this translation). Martinvl (talk) 08:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, I nominated it as an image of that specific statue in Llangrannog rather than as a image relating generally to the saint himself. DeFacto (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. The scope is valid. It is also possible to nominate the image with a different scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The south-east fascade of Compton Verney House.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flower of the Meconopsis betonicifolia (Himalayan blue poppy).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The binomial should always be in italics. The photograph must be geocoded; The scope must be reduced to flower. It would be good that this beautiful image to be used in encyclopedias. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, fixed now. DeFacto (talk) 06:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A pleasing image that illustrates the flower well, which is properly linked to other Wikimedia artciles. The scope properly identifies this image as the flower alone (which is 8-10 cm across - the plant is about 1.2 metres in height. Source: Royal Horticultural Society). Martinvl (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canisbay Church viewed from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Surf Snowdonia artificial wave pool, an overview from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Tilt and perspective issues. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment I've uploaded a straighter version, see what you think. DeFacto (talk) 06:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Public wave riding at Surf Snowdonia, Wales.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Question Nice work DeFacto, but sorry for asking (It's my second vote/comment here) but it is enough for a VI, if it's only used on Commons but not on Wikipedia? Just asking because for a "world's first artificial surfing lagoon" their should be found a Wikipedia article (I think this one 'Surf Snowdonia').

If it isn't needed to be used i will set it directly to 'supported' but if it's u should find a place in this article where u can place your picture and then i wil support it. Best regards --Dr. Chriss (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

• @DeFacto: Okay thanks for your answer. Useful and therefor  Support --Dr. Chriss (talk) 18:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment @Dr. Chriss: I don't think the images have to be in use elsewhere, but it would be good if it was. Currently the en article is the only one about this facility that I could find. Maybe more will appear soon, but it only opened in August 2015. DeFacto (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talisker distillery from the bank of Loch Harport, Isle of Skye.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blickling Hall - south-west facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trucks in the livery of British Road Services.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question shouldn't the photo be geocoded?

•  Comment @J. Lunau: as the trucks could move to anywhere, it is a non-place-related shot. So I do not believe it needs geocoding. DeFacto (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment I disagree - Geocoding an image is a way allowing a third part to authenticate the image. In this case, if the lorries were in a museum (they look like museum-pieces to me), then anybody can go to the museum and check the lorries for themselves. If, on the other hand, the lorries were in a lorry-park, then the inquirer knows not to expect to see them there. At the moment we do not know whether or not these were working examples when the photo was taken or whether they were museum exhibits. Martinvl (talk) 09:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment@DeFacto I share Martinvls arguments. If you are right, only non moving buildings should be geocoded but it is usual for VI to geocode cars as well (can be seen here) --J. Lunau (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment @J. Lunau and Martinvl: I've added the geocode location to the image file as requested and also added context to its description. DeFacto (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment @DeFacto: Thank you, I've added German description as well. --J. Lunau (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support useful and best in scope --J. Lunau (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Myreton Motor Museum, Aberlady, Scotland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Geocoding is missing --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, the bot only just caught up, it is geocoded now. DeFacto (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope is too broad - it covers both the exterior of the museum and its interior. A far better scope would be "Exterior of the Myreton Motor Museum, Aberlady, Scotland". Having said that,COM:VIS#Buildingsstates "Buildings, like other places, should be of more than local interest to justify a scope". I did a Google search for the museum, concentrating a sources that listed all the motor museums in the UK. Neither [AutoExpress] or [Britains Finest] catalogued the Myreton Motor Museum. This leaves me to believe that it is of local importance only. I therefore oppose the submission on two separate count. Martinvl (talk) 12:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Crocodile Rock on the beach in Millport, Isle of Cumbrae.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Woolsthorpe Manor viewed from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This image satisfies all six criteria for a VI nomination. User:Martinvl

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bodnant Hall - west facade, Bodnant Garden, Tal-y-cafn, Wales.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Cotswold Motor Museum viewed from the other side of the bridge outside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Pin Mill, Bodnant Garden, Tal-y-cafn, Wales.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, nobody has any comments, good, bad, or indifferent, for this image? DeFacto (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fisherman and Child sculpture in Mallaig harbour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose This statue is of only local importance and the sculptor is almost unknown. I could not find any references to him or the statue (not even in Wikipedia) other than local announcements of the sculptor donating this statue to the local community. Martinvl (talk) 08:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support We can not neglect the local cultures or naive art. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 19:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Brontë Parsonage Museum viewed from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Maybe it should put "Brontë Parsonage Museum", in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from The Brontë Parsonage viewed from the east to The Brontë Parsonage Museum viewed from the east --DeFacto (talk) 06:20, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Marilyn Monroe sculpture, Haugesund.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Marilyn Monroe sculpture in Haugesund harbour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Henry Moore's house in Perry Green, England.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Touching Souls sculpture in the grounds of Tewkesbury Abbey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxburgh Hall viewed from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The view towards Inveraray Castle from the bridge over the River Aray.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Two-seater Bentley 4½ Litre supercharged, 1929.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There is a specific category for this car: category:1929 Blower Bentley (Ralph Lauren car collection). Should be put in this category and change the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Info, @Archaeodontosaurus: thanks for that advice, but this is not the same car, surprisingly. This is a blower though, so I've changed the scope to that. DeFacto (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment If this car is from the Ralph Lauren car collection then

1. I agree with Archaeodontosaurus that the image shoulf be linked to that category.
2. I disagree with Archaeodontosaurus that the scope should be extended to include that category. That is far too fine a scope and defeats the very purpose of VIs which is to aid users of Commons.
3. The blanking of the numberplate should be undone. The car's numberplate is already in Commons and including it in this image will serve to link it to other images.

Martinvl (talk) 08:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Info, @Martinvl: it's a different car and I can't see any other images of its number plate in the category, so I'd prefer to keep the ID private for now. DeFacto (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Bentley 4½ Litre 1929 to Bentley 4½ Litre supercharged, 1929 --DeFacto (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC) {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment It's better. But we still have the problem of file:Birkin Bentley 4½ Litre Blower.jpg. It is very different, and we can not compare such different cars objectively. Maybe we could add "two seater" in scope and there would be no problem.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Info @Archaeodontosaurus: advice taken and actioned . Thanks. DeFacto (talk) 14:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Bentley 4½ Litre supercharged, 1929 to Two-seater Bentley 4½ Litre supercharged, 1929 --DeFacto (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC) {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Warwick Castle viewed from the bridge over the River Avon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Info, uploaded a better quality image in response to previous comments and renominated
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Carreg Bica rock on the foreshore in Llangrannog, Wales.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There are pages on Wikipedia which photos could be used. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

 Info, @Jacek Halicki: I've added a usage. DeFacto (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kenilworth Castle in the snow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There are pages on Wikipedia which photos could be used. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

 Info, thanks, yes - I just added one. DeFacto (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Llangollen Motor Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morris Mini-Minor Traveller.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Lakeland Motor Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antarctic 100 memorial, Cardiff Bay - viewed from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Mini Moke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shoeburyness Garrison gate and clock tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There are pages on Wikipedia which photos could be used. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done, usage added. DeFacto (talk) 22:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shoeburyness artillery school experimental quick-fire battery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There are pages on Wikipedia which photos could be used. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done, usage added. DeFacto (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

 Best in ScopeJacek Halicki

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morris Mini-Minor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gunby Hall viewed from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Charles (talk) 21:27, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cricket at the Lynton and Lynmouth cricket ground.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Charles (talk) 21:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coventry Climax ET 199 fork lift truck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morris Mini Cooper S - AJB 44B - rear view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard 1980 1098cc Mini Clubman saloon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Really no such thing as a 'standard' Mini Clubman. Should specify year, engine cc. Charles (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Done, @Charlesjsharp: good points - I've now addressed them, I hope. DeFacto (talk) 23:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support thanks. Charles (talk) 00:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The interior of the very first Morris Mini (621 AOK).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Library Cottage, Lyme Regis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lawrence of Arabia's cottage, Clouds Hill.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Done (inserted missing ":" in category syntax). DeFacto (talk) 14:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault Estafette with tall box body.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Only one in category. Charles (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Truvelo Combi speed camera installation in England.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Need to specify model. They make more than one type. Charles (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Done, it's a Combi. DeFacto (talk) 05:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment This could basically be placed anywhere in the world, doesn't really make sense to me to include England in the scope. If you're asking me: Call it Truvelo Combi speed cameras and either create a new category for this brand or just link the scope to en:Truvelo Combi. --El Grafo (talk) 08:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Info, @El Grafo: this is uniquely an English camera as it has the regulation yellow reflective treatment. When used in other countries the same camera will either have no reflector or a different colour or patterned reflector design or even camouflage. DeFacto (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

• OK, that makes sense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support OK. Yann (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard 1979 1098cc Mini Clubman Estate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Great Hall, Oakham Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 The Cliff on Mevagissey harbour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Done, whoops, corrected now, thanks. DeFacto (talk) 06:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Upton House, Banbury - main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burns Cottage from the front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "In Memory Of Loved Ones Lost At Sea" statue in Kirkcudbright Harbour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose: The scope for this nomination is far too narrow. If we include every memorial to those lost at sea, then we must include every memorial to those who died fighting for their country or those who were victims of genocide. The UK alone has over 66000 war memorials! We clearly need to be more selective about memorials that qualify as VIs in their own right. The other alternative is that this memorial is a seminal work by a sculptor (artist) who has an article in Wikipedia. Charlie Easterfield does not fall into this category, though I did find one other reference to a work of his in Commons. Martinvl (talk) 17:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

 Info, @Martinvl: please see the scope definition - this was nominated as an image of a specific sculpture and not as an image of a memorial. DeFacto (talk) 17:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

 Info: @DeFacto: : I am fully aware of that and as explained above that scope was, in my view, far too narrow. Martinvl (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

 Question, @Martinvl: I'd be interested to know what scope you think would be appropriate for this image then. All sculptures by this lady? All sculptures in Kirkcudbright? All wooden sculptures? Please be more constructive. DeFacto (talk) 19:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

 Info: I suggest the scope "Memorials in Scotland to those lost at sea". You might notice that I have added a new category to the image. Martinvl (talk) 03:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment This proposal is bad. Am I less afraid than 66,000 nominations to forget that one. The memory work does not, per package. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Jean11 (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard 1972 850cc Mini Pickup.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I think this is an Austin mini from the badge, not a Morris (as shown in the file name), and the scope should reflect that. Charles (talk) 11:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

 Info, @Charlesjsharp: according to MiniWorld, the Austin and Morris marques were dropped in 1969. From that date they were all sold as simply "Mini Pickup", and the badge does reflect that. This particular car, although badged as merely "Mini", is actually registered as a Morris, hence the file name. DeFacto (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
OK, sorry to make you work for my support! Charles (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beaulieu Palace House viewed from the south-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: I have compared this image to other images that satisfy this scope in Commons and am happy to support this nomination without a MVR. Martinvl (talk) 03:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8, 10 and 12, Long Street, Cerne Abbas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canons Ashby House.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support: I have checked this nomination against all six VI criteria and am satisfied that they are all met. I must place on record however that I added a Wikilink to the description. Martinvl (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard 1963 998cc Wolseley Hornet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aston Martin DB10.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment As this is a recent vehicle, I suspect better images may be offered and it may be too early to rate this one as a VI. Charles (talk) 09:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment: @Charlesjsharp: I changed the status back to "supported" as a comment does not affect the status of a nomination. Only if Charles (or anybody else) had actually opposed this nomination, then the status would be "discussed". Martinvl (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Thanks. It's just that the process of replacing VI images with better ones seems lengthy... Charles (talk) 16:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aston Martin DB5.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard 1968 998cc Riley Elf Mark III.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 16:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Arch Gate, Badby Woods.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Standard 1962 848cc Austin Minivan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Sir Robert Clayton by sculptor Grinling Gibbons.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dylan Thomas's Writing Shed - interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Scope must say interior or specify room. Charles (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Done, @Charlesjsharp: I agree, and have made the change - thanks, DeFacto (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Dylan Thomas's Writing Shed to Dylan Thomas's Writing Shed - interior --DeFacto (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Ok for new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Livingstone Centre - the main buildings.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The monumental bronze "Livingstone and the Lion".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1956 Jaguar XK140 fixed head coupé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1963 Trojan 200.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1953 Jaguar C-Type.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Have we defined that we should a category for every year of a vehicle, or perhaps every engine size etc? It would be worth considering some guidelines as otherwise VI categories could profilerate. This happens to be a noteworthy vehicle so perhaps the scope could be Jaguar C-Type 1953 Mille Miglia. Charles (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, yes this specific car raced in the 1953 Mille Miglia (I've now added that fact to the file description), although the C-Type in general was more notable in the Le Mans 24-hour. And I'd be happy to participate in a discussion about car scopes in general, but perhaps not on this candidate page. DeFacto (talk) 10:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Jubilee Clock Tower in Seaton, England - viewed from the south-east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Perhaps you can add "view from SE" to the scope? --87.177.146.8 21:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Done, I agree. DeFacto (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from The Jubilee Clock Tower in Seaton, England to The Jubilee Clock Tower in Seaton, England - viewed from the south-east --DeFacto (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Best in new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support As above --Llez (talk) 06:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zelden van Passe windmill.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I have added a Dutch translation and a number of Wikilinks to the original image. Martinvl (talk) 11:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laidhay Croft Museum building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultima GTR - front three-quarter view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm only opposing for now so we can have a debate on car scopes - see discussion page. Charles (talk) 14:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Ultima GTR to Ultima GTR - front three-quarter view --DeFacto (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment, scope discussion is at Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list#Car scopes. DeFacto (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't assess this one - too much choice in the category gallery. Charles (talk) 15:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment What would be useful is to put, now in VI, the rear view of the same vehicle. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Agree, I'm working on it - watch this space. :) DeFacto (talk) 18:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Done, see here. DeFacto (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultima GTR - rear three-quarter view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Packwood House - viewed from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mini Pickup 1969–1983 - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The nychthemeron clock, Snowshill Manor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Rotunda, Stowe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There appears to have a problem of perspective. The columns are narrower at the top must be taken into account in the correction. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Done, I thought it looked wrong, but didn't realise why! Thanks for your enlightenment. :) Although a new one is uploaded, I cannot see it on the page yet - even after cache purge. DeFacto (talk) 07:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Hermitage, Stowe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aston Martin DB10 - rear three-quarter view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Hadn't we agree rear view is OK? Charles (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

 Comment, @Charlesjsharp: the discussion hasn't been closed on that yet, so I guess it isn't finalised. I thought if I wasn't specific here, and was challenged to an "MVR" against other straight "rear views", I wouldn't be able to cite an actual rule, so put it in full. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Palladian Bridge, Stowe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Corinthian Arch, Stowe - from the south-east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Best image looking down towards Stowe, but there is an image looking up the hill. Just add from the East/West or whatever.Charles (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment, @Charlesjsharp: good point. I'll do that. DeFacto (talk). 15:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from The Corinthian Arch, Stowe to The Corinthian Arch, Stowe - from the south-east --DeFacto (talk). 15:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment, @Jacek Halicki: support vote cancelled because of scope change. DeFacto (talk). 15:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Wooden Bridge, Stowe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wolseley 2200 - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MG Maestro EFi - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MG Maestro EFi - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austin Victoria MKII De Luxe - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question why the number plate is manipulated? --Ralf Roleček 20:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Info @Ralf Roletschek: it's common on Commons and English Wikipedia - to protect owner privacy and reduce the opportunity and temptation for number plate cloning and other vehicle crime. DeFacto (talk). 20:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

• But that's ugly. And why not so? Its german but you understand only the photos... --Ralf Roleček 20:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC) I never change a number plate.

I'm not very skilled - can you help? Is black better? DeFacto (talk). 20:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Can cou send me the originals to ralf@roletschek.de - i change the number plate. --Ralf Roleček 20:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done. DeFacto (talk). 21:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austin Victoria MKII De Luxe - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The RAF North Coates Strike Wing World War II War Memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ's Chapel of God's Gift, Dulwich - from the north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The automotive factory frontage in Drews Lane, Birmingham - during its LDV era.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Cathedral", Forest of Dean Sculpture Trail.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Healey Westland Roadster - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The view of London north from Lambeth Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support There's another image which is in some ways a better photo but this one has a wider angle and is more useful. Charles (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imperial War Museum, London - north view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lambeth Bridge, London - north-west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elizabeth Tower - west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image (whch is already a featured image has virtually the same scope, is a much better image and also has a much better description. Martinvl (talk) 10:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl: that image is cropped too high so doesn't show the full tower height. DeFacto (talk). 10:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl: It's a close call. The featured image has better resolution, but this one has better composition and color. WikiPedant (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

@WikiPedant: Is it worth organising a MVR run-off?

@Martinvl: After rereading the VI criteria and the QI criteria, it's pretty clear that very high resolution is a more important criterion for a quality image than for a valued image. The VI criteria specify only "reasonable sharpness". I think this image is the most telling illustration within the scope of the subject (and I even looked though all 566 Commons external views of the Tower), so I'm going to support it. -- WikiPedant (talk) 23:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--WikiPedant (talk) 23:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support At full resolution it looks horribly over-sharpened, but that's not really of concern here. At the default review size it illustrates the subject better, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Martinvl. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 05:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austin Maxi 1970-1980 - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Of course, but what a dreadful car it was. Charles (talk) 10:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Castle Bridge remains, Warwick - west view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chesterton Windmill.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment. This is certainly an excellent image, but this B&W one with the same scope is also excellent. I wouldn't want to elevate one above the other. Maybe tighten the scope by adding "in color"? -- WikiPedant (talk) 23:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austin Maxi 1970-1980 - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)