User talk:Carolus Ludovicus~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Carolus Ludovicus!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 312448807139a5144d5a07f1e2581476

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

http://toolserver.org/~magnus/commonshelper.php

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung mehrerer deiner Bilder aus der Herz Jesu-Kirche

[edit]

Hallo Carolus, wie du ja bereits auf de:WP:DÜP/F bemerkt hast, sind leider einige der Kunstwerke, die du abfotografiert hast, noch geschützt. Ich habe daher mehrere Bilder von dir zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, nachstehen die Links zu den Löschanträgen. Vielleicht weißt du ja bei dem einen oder anderen Bild noch, von wem das entsprechenden Kunstwerk ist und wann der Urheber gestorben ist. Bitte schau auch nochmal auf DÜP/F vorbei, dort habe ich auch noch ein paar Fragen.

Beste Grüße, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Puppenbrunnen

[edit]

Hallo,

Warum hast du denn die ekligen blaustichigen Bilder des Puppenbrunnens hochgeladen, der läuft doch nicht weg? --Norbert Schnitzler (talk) 09:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn Du für Ersatz gesorgt hast, vergiß bitte nicht, das Ekelzeug weglöschen zu lassen. Meinen Segen hast Du nicht nur dazu, für Ersatz zu sorgen, gerade auch insbesondere auch für die anschließende Löschung der unnötig gewordenen Bilder. Wenn Du Dich mit dem Ersatz beeilst, ist das Risiko auch gering, daß inzwischen jemand das Ekelzeug verwendet und reihenweise Links recherchiert und erneuert werden müssen.
Ich hab damals die Knipse auf die "Mach-optimale-Bilder-Automatik" gestellt, glaube ich mich vage zu erinnern. Was hätte ich besser machen sollen? Die Photos entstanden irgendwann im Dezember 2008 zur späten Mittagszeit, kurz vor Einsetzen der Dämmerung. Es war stinkekalt -nicht nur in den Fingern- und meine Nichte sprang alle paar Sekunden ins Bild, um mich kurz darauf bettelnd an den versprochenen heißen Kakao zu erinnern.
Ich war froh, bei dem "nicht weglaufenden" Motiv ausnahmsweise einmal 1. in dem engen Hof etwas Licht und 2. die Knipse in der Hand und 3. manchmal keine an den Puppen spielnden Kiddies und Touries vor der Linse zu haben. Irgendwelche Tips?
Kurzum, ich glaube, die Ergänzung der Files ist bis auf weiteres eine Verbesserung. Für jeden Rat dankbar grüßt herzlich Carolus Ludovicus (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

20:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

02:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]