User talk:C messier/Archive 1

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Εικόνα Παγκρήτιου

Απλά συμπλήρωσα έναν σύνδεσμο προς το αρχικό αρχείο, και διόρθωσα και την άδεια (CC-0 δεν είναι το ίδιο με ΚΚ). Μπορείς να δεις την αλλαγή εδώ. Λυπάμαι για την εξαιρετικά καθυστερημένη απόκριση, φίλτατε, λόγω υποχρεώσεων. Φιλικά, Badseed ^talk 18:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear C messier,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:OAKA ACDC.jpeg

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 08:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A08 Koules 844.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Colours are a bit dull but ok for QI. --Mattbuck 19:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica 3997.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophagi AMH 334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aikaterini Sinaiton B080749.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica 3947.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too dark. Could you brighten it? --Tuxyso 23:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC) Done --C messier 23:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality now. --Tuxyso 21:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mineralogical mining museum of Agios Konstantinos 1847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One problem imo, easy to fix (see note, please). --JLPC 15:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)  Done I tried my best. --C messier 16:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC) OK now.--JLPC 18:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ελιά 4560.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Consensual review

Γεια σας,for the Consensual review you must wait 8 days for close and more you must count the effective  Support  Oppose. ευχαριστίες.--LivioAndronico talk 16:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

efcharisto

Thanks for nomination of my picture --Pe-sa (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Preparing for QIC

Could you please, help me to identify this species? Best Regards!!!!

• 
• 

Ezarateesteban 18:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) in flight in Venice at sunrise.jpg

Hi, my image [1] has been promoted by you as QI [2], but I've not been informed by QICbot of that and the QI-sign is not set on the file-site. Can you manage that? Kind regards! --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 10:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φορτέτζα 2809.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φορτέτζα 3143.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φορτέτζα 3167.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φαράγγι Σαμαριάς 3775.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but why f4.5?--Famberhorst 06:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC) Program mode, it's f/9 equivalent.--C messier 14:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC) Okay, thank you.--Famberhorst 19:26, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φαλάσαρνα 4598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καθολική εκκλησία Ρεθύμνου 2792 p.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καμάριζα 1747.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φαράγγι Σαμαριάς 3700.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λότζια Ηρακλείου 6092.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μιναρές Βελή Πασά 2949.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ρέθυμνο 2972.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φαράγγι Σαμαριάς 3782.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ρέθυμνο 2988.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too much sky and too much water.--XRay 09:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 16:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. Thanks. --XRay 05:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Θεά των Όφεων 6393.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You could add the geolocation of the Heraklion Museum. --Bgag 16:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minoan Snake Goddess figurines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ρέθυμνο 2926 p.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Marina-Bay Singapore Firework-launching-CNY-2015-03.jpg

Don't take it personal, but your idea about an alleged horizont line in this photo is somewhat crazy. The first reason is, that you cannot see a horizon from the balcony of my hotel. Second is, that at the lights at the left side are the lights from Gardens park and not from highrises. I am sorry, but I cannot correct an photo based on a new idea of tilt detection. There are only two ways to make a decision about tilt: Either you use verticals or you use the horizon of the open see. Never can you decide upon a shoreline. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually I tried to find where the horizon should be. --C messier (talk) 12:11, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

 Info I moved your message here. A talk is always to be continued where it started. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

You tell me, that despite the fact that it is night, you just make a guess where the horizon should be. Based on that guess, you insinuate, that there is a tilt? Did I got that right? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your balcony is B, C is the port and A are the ships. The b'BC corner is smaller than the b'BA corner, so from B, C appears lower in the image than A.--C messier (talk) 12:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Cccefalon, it is not really a guess. More distant objects at ground level (like the ships) should appear higher in the image than closer (the port visible through the skyscrapers), but that's not the case here.--C messier (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Just use the present verticals in the photo, thats enough. I don't see a reason why you are trying to "proof" that your theory is right. It is just a theory, because there is no horizon visible from the viewpoint. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Cccefalon, after perspective correction, all verticals became really vertical, as they are used to correct perspective, even if the horizon is tilted. --C messier (talk) 14:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

I made a slight improvement on the left side with the verticals of the concrete pilars as reference. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your QI review, please take a second look to Klinikum Bayreuth November 21014

I've uploaded a new version with lens correction profile in use and I think it is much better now, so I kindly ask you for a second look, regards --J. Lunau (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Removed nomination

Sorry, it was my mistake ! I didn't do it on purpose ! Sorry again ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Crete ?

Καλησπέρα, C messier,

Sorry for this personal question but: are you Cretan ? I'm just back from a wonderful journey to this magnificent island. I hope you will enjoy my pictures from there ! Best regards,--Jebulon (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Jebulon, I am from Athens, but I live in Crete the last 3,5 years. I'm looking forwards to see your work. --C messier (talk) 12:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Excellent ! I'm happy to have a greek colleague here in "Commons" !--Jebulon (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Rethymno lighthouse, answer

Dear C messier, there is nothing trivial in your infos ! I'm very happy to learn about this lighthouse (or about anything, actually). OK for Egypt ! Anyway, what an interesting country you are citizen of ! Thanks for all your precious comments and help... I hope I'll not make too much mistakes when uploading following pictures from Chania soon !!--Jebulon (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κομμένο Μπεντένι 7440.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me --Hubertl 10:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τείχη Ηρακλείου 7419.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 11:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Archaeological Museum of Heraklion, help needed

Hi my favourite Hellenic "commoner".

Every time I take a picture of an object in a museum, I take a picture of the related plaque too.

Unfortunately, the captions in the (wonderful) AMH are really poor, with almost no detailed elements, useful for a picture caption like this one for instance.

Do you know where I could find a good catalogue of the AMH collections "online", even in greek (I'm able to read greek a little, enough for a basic understanding) ? It could be very interesting for me, and for the enhancement of the knowledge ! (Odysseus.culture.gr is not complete, IMO) Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 14:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the link, the book is very interesting, even if not a "catalogue".I've already found explanations for objects I have taken in pictures I did'nt know how to explain. It will help me a lot for better captions, and for improving my knowledge of greek reading ! Very good !--Jebulon (talk) 22:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ρέθυμνο 2822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τούρκικο Σχολείο Ρεθύμνου 3071.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The contrast settings are too low. Also it needs magenta defringing -> take a look at the branches top right, they are completely light magenta. --Cccefalon 07:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 17:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Not 1005 resolved but I credit the late evening situation with a lot of red and magneta colours. Take it as a weak support. --Cccefalon 04:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φορτέτζα 3157.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and venetian (not egyptian  !) Do you think you could manage the strong chromatic noise in the sky ?--Jebulon 14:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 14:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Very good.--Jebulon 16:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Τεσσαράκοντα Κηφισιά 7919.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check for CAs top left.--XRay 13:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC) I can't see them, can you leave a note. Thanks. --C messier 14:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 15:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment Like Jebulon I've added notes to your image. CAs are still there.--XRay 16:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Done I hope :P. --C messier 17:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO it's acceptable now. --XRay 18:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Happy Easter !--Jebulon (talk) 11:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

• -Le Christ est ressuscité !
• -Il est vraiment ressuscité, Alléluia !

(as say Christians in France).--Jebulon (talk) 16:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μουσείο Γουλανδρή 7886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 13:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγγελος Ακοτάντος - Άγιος Φανούριος 7660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:41, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γενέσιο του Προδρόμου (1670) 7692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much magenta and also magenta fringes IMO. Fixable. Otherwise good. --Cccefalon 12:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Done Defringing, but not really sure what to do with magenta because it is one step from becaming IMO greenish. --C messier 12:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Don't change more! Your enhancements did it already! It's QI. --Cccefalon 13:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Άγιου Μηνά και Παντάνασσας 7590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Seems better now --Moroder 22:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Σταθμός ΗΣΑΠ Κηφισιά 7951.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me after new version --Hubertl 03:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Η δέηση - Συλλογή Αγίας Αικατερίνης 7672.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks for your update. Good quality. --Slaunger 17:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κύμη 8398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Θέκλας Εύβοια 8148 rt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Θέκλας Εύβοια 8144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μαρίνα Ζέας 8017.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κύμη 8392.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δεξαμενή Άλσους Κηφισιάς 7946.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κύμη 8391.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add Euboea and Greece to the file description. --Cayambe 09:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χανιά 3558.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI despite of the haze, but this is because of weather conditions. --Hubertl 21:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φαράγγι Σαμαριάς 3754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments specially.--Famberhorst 17:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Σταμάτα 7981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood, but a geocode would help.--Jebulon 23:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μετσόβιο Πολυτεχνείο 7936.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now --Hubertl 13:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agios Nikolaos chapel at Agios Nikolaos..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Done --C messier (talk) 08:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Δημήτριος Αυλωνάρι 8177.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πλατάνα Εύβοια 8257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Δημήτριος Αυλωνάρι 8227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Note: building is tilted.--Famberhorst 17:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 18:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Nice.--Famberhorst 18:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Δημήτριος Αυλωνάρι 8229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Athens Central Market - facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Félicitations !!

Bonjour mon Grec préféré de Commons!!

Je te félicite, une image prise par toi est en première page de la WP francophone !

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Accueil_principal

Je vais bien sûr, moi aussi, publier bientôt des photos de ce fameux disque !

à bientôt, --Jebulon (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χαμάμ Χάληδων 8783.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check for CAs at the tree top right. --XRay 14:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 15:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. --XRay 17:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αρχαίο νεκροταφείο Κυδωνίας 8245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 14:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τοπανάς 8353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τοπανάς 8356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χανιά Λιμάνι 8184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Empty sky, empty sea...IMO you should crop above, below, and at left until the first lamp post (ugly cropped van). My (severe) opinion...--Jebulon 20:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 20:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Support Better and good enough for me. (Remembers me good moments there).--Jebulon 20:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παναγία Λιαουτσιάνισσα 8380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A dirt in the sky, otherwise ok for QI. --Cccefalon 11:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)  Done Opps, I had uploaded the wrong version. --C messier 16:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Few suggestions: Hi, i saw you use Epl5, camera i used to have. Its strong and superb, just if you use it in correct setting. I see you got often to f/10. This is way to much for m4/3 format. Best results are around F/4...you can see some mine, i know use Ep5 and GM1 which have same size of sensor. I never go more than f/4.5 ...photo is loosing quality after that margin. Regards, --Mile (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion, I have not calculated diffraction limit for 4/3, but it must be around f/9. In some cases, f/4 doesn't deliver enough DOF. --C messier (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πλατεία Αθηναγόρα 8135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted cw. --Cccefalon 08:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 09:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύλη ενετικού διοικητηρίου 8380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Ρόκκος Χανιά 8406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, pse see the note. --Cccefalon 08:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 08:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μεγάλο Αρσενάλι 8187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO good now. --Berthold Werner 12:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC) --Berthold Werner 12:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κύμη 8395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χανιά από επιπρομαχώνα Σιάβο 8322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Φάρος Χανίων 8368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μιναρές Αχμέτ Αγά Χανιά 8298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Επιπρομαχώνας Sciavo ή Lando 8125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --Hubertl 09:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Χατζημιχάλη Νταλιάνη Χανιά 8774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μιναρές Αγίου Νικολάου 8411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Λεβίδου 7899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO contrast should be better. The black car isn't black.--XRay 06:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC) It can be completely black, it reflects the sky and brighter regions. (But please wait for a version with more contrast) --C messier 13:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)  Support Yes. IMO OK.--XRay 14:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ο Άγιος Ιωάννης ο Θεολόγος και Πρόχορος - Συλλογή Αγίας Αικατερίνης 7690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κηφισσιά σταθμός 7857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χανιά 8169.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Busy and unclear composition ? --Jebulon 20:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Intended to be a tight cityscape. --C messier 20:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)I'll wait for further comments by others...--Jebulon 20:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --MB-one 14:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήτη 1 8640 rt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Star Patmos 8649.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Star 2 στον Πειραιά 8657.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δημοτικός Κήπος Χανίων 8265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Potentially ruinous contrast issues handled well. But sky color could be better. --Daniel Case 15:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthodox liturgical rosewater sprinkler Agia Aikaterini Collection, Heraklion, Greece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

There are 10 images only in the category. Is the Orthodox liturgical rosewater sprinkler better? --C messier (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

add to scope the place where you can see the object differentiates it and would be useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

 Done --C messier (talk) 06:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Προμαχώνας Σαν Σαλβατόρε 8796.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γιαλί τζαμί Χανιά 8366.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 16:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μητρόπολη Χανίων 8319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αγία Ειρήνη Χανιά 8769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice compo. Might I hint, that the sky looks a little bit photoshopped and would benefit from reducing saturation? --Cccefalon 07:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γεώργιος Καστροφύλακας - Άγιος Χαράλαμπος και σκηνές από τον βίο του 7715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δυτική τάφρος Χανιά 8794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πρόσβαση στον επιπρομαχώνα Sciavo 8324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δημοτικός Κήπος Χανίων 8261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelische Kirchengemeinde Kretan 8443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  QuestionSomething wrong in the color in the sky ?--~~~~  Done Better? --C messier 12:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC) SupportYes.--Jebulon 19:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Α. Μελιδόνη 8418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

I made you croped version here, with some contrast added. --Mile (talk) 11:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χαλέπα 8764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Σκουφών 8343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportNice (I was there !)--Jebulon 09:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη τζαμιού Μεχμέτ Αγά Χανιά 8340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Optimist4343 09:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Σαρπάκη 8773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Καθολική εκκλησία Χανίων 8320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χανιά 8325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Επιπρομαχώνας Σάντα Καταρίνα 8351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη στην καθολική εκκλησία Χανίων 8140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. but why f3.5?--Famberhorst 18:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βυζαντινά τείχη Χανίων 8375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύλη Αγίου Γεωργίου Ηράκλειο 9939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I like the composition--ArildV 08:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ανατολικά τείχη Χανίων 8200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of Chania, Crete - interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be useful to put in the scope and in the caption the name of the region (Crete). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Ποτιέ, Χανιά 8299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Γιαλί Τζαμί Χανιά 8369.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 13:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μητροπολιτικός ναός Χανίων 8786.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πόρτα μητρόπολης Χανίων 8791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χαλέπα 8766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much magenta in the image; please see especially the branches at the right side. --Cccefalon 12:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 12:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Considerably better! Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη Γενιτσάρ Αγά Ηράκλειο 9932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Προμαχώνας Σαν Σαλβατόρε 8349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Πέτρος των Δομηνικανών 8470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Περιφέρεια Κρήτης 8997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύλη Βιττούρι 8493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βυζαντινά τείχη Χανίων 8780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09234 Λυκούργος Τσάκωνας.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09065 Robine Schürmann.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09080 Περικλής Ιακωβάκης.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09085 Jesper Arts.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 17:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κούλες 9428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is a bit noisy, but ok overall --Poco a poco 14:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη Μοροζίνι ή Λιοντάρια 9414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πύλη θαλασσίων τειχών Ηρακλείου 9437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Πέτρος των Δομινικανών Ηράκλειο 9448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks a little bit hazy - can you increase the contrast? --Code 18:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 18:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Code 16:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κουρμούληδων 54 Ηράκλειο 7353.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Οδός Πλαστήρα, Ηράκλειο 7342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice perspective. Thrash bins are a pity, but not your fault--Jebulon 15:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κούλες 9869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good, but it would have been better with more background and less foreground. --Iifar 14:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10331 Eleriin Haas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC) It will look better if you brighten it about 0.5 in Lightroom. --Kadellar 19:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10730 Jan Kudlička.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Don't you think you could brighten it a little, please ?--Jebulon 21:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Done You are right. --C messier 10:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC) Support I think it's good now.--Jebulon 22:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χάλκινο προσωπείο Μέδουσας ΑΜΗ 9034.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ομοίωμα ναού του τύπου της θεάς με υψωμένα χέρια ΑΜΗ 9145.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τύμπανο Ιδαίου Άνδρου 9098 rt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 19:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

No problem

if you want to do the complete housekeeper job from now on QI-Consensual review. --Hubertl (talk) 19:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 09958 Δημήτρης Τσιάμης.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark, brighten it please! --Kadellar 19:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 14:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC) I'd go beyond, but ok, thanks. --Kadellar 12:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Χαλέπιος πεύκη Σούνιο 1963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λεωφόρος Σοφοκλή Βενιζέλου Ρέθυμνο 2745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αγία Αικατερίνη των Σιναϊτών 7392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. Still, cannot really understand what you say. I wouldn't have shot ISO 200 and you should always apply some sharpness to your raws, but only there where it is needed --Poco a poco 11:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC) ISO 200 is the base ISO. --C messier 07:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Photo workers houses in Lavrio

Hi, I have redeveloped your photo (standard lens correction + small manual lens correction to improve perspective). Un fortunately I am not very satisfied about the result, because the house does not fit completely on the photo; I don't think it is from Q1-quality! Shall I upload my version on your photo? If you don't like it, you might always delete my version. Greetings, --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 08907 Martin Bingisser.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 12:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10475 Sietske Noorman.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Λιμάνι Ηρακλείου 9866.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Βιβλιοθήκη Αδριανού 7983.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Φαράγγι Σαμαριάς 3754.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Φαράγγι Σαμαριάς 3754.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιοι Ασώματοι Θησείο 7989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:49, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Because you are the master maintainer for consensual review

You do the same what I did. Finishing a discussion earlier when it seems, that the result is clear. But you meant to overrule my decisions twice. It´s now your work to do this job. Have fun. Please consider the periods exactly. You have had my mailaddress to talk with me about, but you mean, administrating and overruling is a good and acceptable practice. --Hubertl (talk) 09:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κρήνη Σαγκρέντο 9417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Διονύσιος Αεροπαγίτης - εσωτερικό 1053 hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC) Added a french description. (I was there !!) And I was to support, but Poco did it before me... Dionysos Arepoagitis was converted by Saint Paul, and became the first bishop of Athens.--Jebulon 10:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κινηματογράφος Αττικόν 1074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO: wires and walking man are not disturbing but please cut off the bus at the right side --Michielverbeek 22:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Done--C messier 22:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παλιά Δημοτική Πινακοθήκη, Αθήνα 1089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of Agios Markos, Heraclion, Crete.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αναστήλωση του Φετιχιέ τζαμιού Αθήνα 9755.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO no photos from building sites, just wait till restoration has been done. However I cannot deny technical quality is Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παλιά Βουλή των Ελλήνων 9741.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Πυρκαγιά Καρέα 2015-7-17 1270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning compostition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Τζιτζίκι 9650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit soft but good enough for QI. --Hockei 19:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Εργατικές κατοικίες Κυπριανός Λαύριο 2019.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 23:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment I have already done perspective correction. What was your reference point? Keep in mind it's an old building. --C messier 16:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC) Comment I reverted your version, because it was leaning out to the left. --C messier 19:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC) new version --C messier 13:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC) OK now. --Hubertl 06:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Αντώνιος - Άγιοι Απόστολοι Σολάκη 1133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 19:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Παλιά Βουλή των Ελλήνων 9737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CA at the left, and maybe some sharpening would be better --A.Savin 11:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC) Done --C messier 12:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC) Good. --A.Savin 12:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιος Σεραφείμ - Άγιοι Απόστολοι Σολάκη 1132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγιοι Απόστολοι του Σολάκη 1128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Δημαρχείο Αθηνών 9734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky bears a lot of color noise (the small red grains) and I suggest to raise color denoising. Elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 14:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Done (I think) --C messier 14:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Can pass as QI imo, though I guess, you denoised sky instead of color denoising'. Still red areas but below complaint level. --Cccefalon 04:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κίονας Αθηνάς - Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1223.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Κίονας Απόλλωνα - Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1224.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Άγαλμα Αδριανού στην Αρχαία Αγορά της Αθήνας 1164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μνημείο των Επώνυμων Ηρώων 1182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Μέγαρο Γεωργίου Στράτου - Εθνική Τράπεζα 1249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Αρσάκειο 1070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze drum from Idean Cave, Crete, late 8th century BC.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 08:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)