User talk:Butko/Архив (март 2015)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Translations

Hi! I noted that you categorized File:Церковь Казанчецоц.jpg as Category:Churches in unidentified countries. Maybe it was simply because you categorized many images and did not have time to look closer into all of them, but in case a tip might be of any worth, I'd like to point out that it is quite easy to identify countries by using Google translate, which can be accessed by a right-click with add-ons. I use Mozilla and gtranslate. Sincerely, --Jonund (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for advice --Butko (talk) 07:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Массовые загрузки

Ожидает

Добрый день, коллега. Видите ли, вслед за неаккуратной атрибуцией в источнике Вы повторили ошибку относительно автора этих литографий. А. В. Морозов - это ru:Морозов, Алексей Викулович, промышленник, коллекционер, автор Каталога собрания русских гравированных и литографированных портретов. В этом издании и нужно искать настоящего автора. С уважением, Sealle (talk) 03:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Исправил описание --Butko (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


Прошу помочь

Доброго здоровья! Вчера было удалено несколько файлов, загруженных мною (File:Fest logo ultimate.jpg и др., см. User talk:Лобачев Владимир). Я заметил, когда они уже были удалены и не смог среагировать (исправить, дополнить или просто объяснить). Причем файлы были сделаны или мною или сфотографированы специально по моей просьбе для Википедии. Что в этом случае посоветуете предпринять? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Плакаты были удалены т.к. кроме фотографа ещё учитывают права авторов самого плаката. Фотографии Геннадия Михеева были удалены, т.к. на его сайте написано, что он разрешает только некоммерческое использование, а такие материалы Викисклад не принимает. Чтобы загрузить его фотографии нужно, чтобы он изменил описание на сайте или написал письмо как описано здесь - Commons:OTRS/ru. То же самое с плакатами - нужны прямые разрешения от их авторов --Butko (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
А по поводу File:Fest logo ultimate.jpg? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Нужно найти автора плаката и получить его разрешение --Butko (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Это, если мне не изменяет память, логотип (плакат с логотипом) фестиваля "Звенящие кедры" в Белгороде, который рисовал я. Имеется и векторный оригинал. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Я его здесь также разместил. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Восстановил. --Butko (talk) 17:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Спасибо большое. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 17:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 21:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 00:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


ЭСБЕ и НЕ ЭСБЕ

Андрей, начиная с File:Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary 007.jpg и заканчивая File:Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary 572.jpg (из того, что пока вижу, это не ЭСБЕ, а Engraved illustrations of Classical Sculpture from Iconographic Encyclopedia of Science, Literature and Art, Published in 1851. В подверждение [вот]. Думаю нужно убрать эти файлы из категории Images from Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary и создать для них другую. Файлы ценные, интересные, но не из этой энциклопедии, увы. --С уважением, sav 14:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Спасибо. Поменяю. --Butko (talk) 20:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Я перенёс изображения в Category:Engraved illustrations from Iconographic Encyclopedia of Science, Literature and Art, Published in 1851 и переименовал их. Только у меня получилось 488 файлов, а не 445 как в обсуждении по ссылке. Описания поменяю чуть позже, пока можно проверить правильный ли список получился --Butko (talk) 22:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Спасибо за оперативность. --С уважением, sav 00:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Скан серии марок

Здравствуйте, уважаемый коллегаǃ Привел в порядок сканы марок СССР 1938 г. c:Category:Stamps of the Soviet Union, 1938. Осталось разобраться с одним изображением. Ваш скан серии марок [[1]] Является дубликатом скана [[2]], только у вашего скана черные поля больше. Как вы отнесетесь к удалению вашего изображения? --Matsievsky (talk) 08:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Думаю, одного файла вполне достаточно --Butko (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


Номера танков-памятников в Донецке

Здравствуйте. Если вы ещё появляетесь в Донецке и у вас появится такая возможность, попробуйте сфотографировать заводские серийные номера танков Т-34 и Т-34-85 у мемориала (где точно, см. [3]). Хотелось бы создать категории для "путешественников", чтобы включали все их фотографии. Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Попробую, если их не забрали для военных нужд. По-моему, какую-то часть техники из парка использовали --Butko (talk) 20:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

The problem is in specifying the exact author of the file. I looked at vk profile of the original uploader Katsyaryna Sidarenka of this photo. I took the first Shurik I found and thought that it's him. Could you please contact Katsyaryna Sidarenka and ask her who exactly was the author of the photo. --217.21.43.22 14:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Years as categories

ButkoBot sometimes categorizes images with a year. It is almost never useful to add a year as a category, since those who take a look in a category search for images that illustrate the topic of that category, and not random events that happened to take place in a certain year. Year-categories are easily cluttered by irrelevant images. They should rather contain subcategories and images of important events. I suggest that we let users add year-categories manually and avoid letting bots do it. --Jonund (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

It was test attempt to sort out files without categories. Now bot doesn't add such categories any more --Butko (talk) 18:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Paper money

Hi Butko, how are you? I have a doubt about one of your edits. Since numismatics is "the study or collection of currency, including coins, tokens, paper money, and related objects.", why did you remove its category from here? Regards, Sturm (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

This file has been already placed into Category:Banknotes. If we include banknotes into numismatics, we should include all category instead simple file. --Butko (talk) 05:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Congrats for you great history of contributions. Best wishes from Brazil! Sturm (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Нужна помощь

Не моги бы вы взглянуть и желательно удалить вот это?--79.126.105.213 22:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Уже удалили --Butko (talk) 06:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Wellcome Images Barnstar

Wellcome Images volunteer barnstar
Thank you for helping to categorise the Wellcome Image library uploads. You are in our project hall of fame for your work! :-) -- (talk) 13:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you --Butko (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Панарамио

Здравствуйте. Загрузил фото с Панарамио https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vagonostroitel_stadium.jpg Что нужно добавить, дабы его не удалили? Наверное нужна проверка администратором -- Absent69 2014-12-06

К сожалению, лицензия этой фотографии не совместима с Викискладом, т.к. нужно ещё разрешение автора создавать производные работы --Butko (talk) 21:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Piers

Not sure it was covered in the discussion, but cases like this make the renaming look like a bad idea. (Where is the discussion, by the way?) -- Tuválkin 23:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I created Category:Unidentified piers, but it should be meta-category. Country is one of criterions of identification such us type, date, architector, material etc. --Butko (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. The issue I mean arises when the country is known (Maldives) but the exact location is not. In that example, should Category:Piers in unidentified countries be removed, since the contry is known, the whole categorization of the photo would lose any connection to piers. A way to fix it would be Category:Unidentified piers in the Maldives, but given the scarce amount of unidentified piers in Commons (or at least those categorized as such), it seems unwarrented. -- Tuválkin 14:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes, Unidentified piers in the Maldives is beter name for category --Butko (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

О вандализме участника Silar

Доброго здоровь, коллега! Для статьи о славянских традициях праздника ru:Громницы мною была создана категория Category:Candlemas (slavic festival) и загружены соответствующие иллюстрации. Однако в последнее время указанный участник удаляет из нее все файлы. Аргументации, что существует такая статья — не помогли. К сожалению, мои знания английского не позволяют создать соответствующую дискуссию. Посоветуйте, как правильно поступить в данной ситуации? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Files_from_Ukraine_by_media_type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Alan Liefting (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

ANNA news

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 23:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

ButkoBot doing bad categorizations

Edits like this are absolutely wrong, the country is well identified. You are merely pigeonholing files to a subcategory without any criteria, please stop doing that.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Country is well identified now --Butko (talk) 03:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

You are also misrepresenting what your bot is doing by using a vague and innocuous term as "maintenance" in the edit summary. These kind of category changes are not maintenance at all.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:47, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Amazing work! Aga (d) 14:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you --Butko (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

"Maintenance"

Could you please give Butkobot's edits, such as [4], a better description than "Maintenance"? "Maintenance of Category:Fountains" perhaps. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok. I'll give better descriptions --Butko (talk) 09:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I nominated several images for VI, and one for FP. Thanks again for uploading these. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

У этой фотографии с датой всё нормально? Можно добавить немножко описания что это и где? --sasha (krassotkin) 08:49, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Да, судя по составу участников фото сделано гораздо раньше. Дата в EXIF от сканера, наверное Настя сканировала отпечаток или плёнку. Попробую уточнить. --Butko (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)


Возврат флага переименования

Здравствуйтеǃ Не могли бы вы вернуть мне права на переименование файлов? --Matsievsky (talk) 20:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Переклади

Привіт! Чи можеш впровадити мої переклади в MediaWiki - [5] --A1 (talk) 10:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Butko (talk) 21:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 03:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Monasteries_in_unidentified_countries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Gnangarra 02:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Categories naming

I see you using a bot to recategorise images into Category:Foo in unidentified Country this is inaccurate as the image are in country categories already they just havent been put into a country category within a specific structure ie buildings in country. You are also removing them from higher level categories and placing them into a single branch when they should in other more appropriate categories within the higher level structure. I suggest you take some time to think about how to better identify and sort these so as to avoid devaluing the whole collection. Gnangarra 02:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

I agree that Subject unsorted by country can be more accurate name. Single photos shouldn't be in higher level categories. Usualy higher level categories are added by bot, flickf2coommons or users without expirience and duplicate with more accurate categories. Category by country doesn't depend on other appropriate categories. They may be changed separately. --Butko (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

This video needs a direct source link, and there's something wrong with how it displays and plays; I can play the first 6 seconds, but then the frame freezes, and only the audio continues. I reviewed the rest with no problems. INeverCry 03:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

I'll try to fix file soon --Butko (talk) 09:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Цікаво

Цікаво, а навіщо Ви розповсюджуєте російську брехливу пропаганду [6] ? Чи Ви із тих, хто "протів хунти" і за "рюскій мір" ? — Green Zero обг 17:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

 Comment @Stas1995: I've restored Green Zero's original edit as it's probably better to let Butko decide how he wants to respond. INeverCry 23:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


Пристегните ремни

На Вас лично открыли травлю в укрвики. SkyBon (talk) 12:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Кастую Вас в тред. SkyBon (talk) 13:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Спасибо за поддержку. Не удивлён таким поведением --Butko (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

категории персон

Вы в массовом порядке создаёте категории персон без defaultsort'а. Это приводит к тому, что в материнских категориях практически невозможно что-либо найти попервой букве фамилии. Ваш бот сможет исправить все ваши недочёты, или вы сделаете всё сами вручную very soon now, или предпочитаете переложить эту работу на коллег? --A.Savin 08:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Исправлю вручную very soon --Butko (talk) 08:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Спасибки. --A.Savin 09:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


Deletion requests

Переименование/удаление марок СССР

Здравствуйтеǃ Можно ли с вами консультироваться по поводу переименования/удаления изображений марок на складе? --Matsievsky (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Пожалуйста. Спрашивайте. --Butko (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Ваша марка 1969 г.. Эта же марка есть еще в виде 2 гашеных 1 и 2, а также 2 чистых 3 и 4. Что лучше сделать с вашей маркой: удалить или оставить? --Matsievsky (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Вот эта отсканирована лучше, чем моя. Но моя крупнее. 3 и 4 вообще одинаковые. Я бы из всего набора (включая мою) оставил номера 2 и 3, но это не принципиально --Butko (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Тогда не могли бы вы удалить вашу марку или хотя бы выставить вашу марку на удаление как ее заливщик? Эту марку я уже пытался удалить несколькими способами, но безуспешно. А у вас как у хозяина особые права. Возможно, по критериям Склада ваша марка неудаляема. Впрочем, у меня сложилось впечатление, что сканы рваных марок также не подлежат удалению по этим критериям... --Matsievsky (talk) 23:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Спасибоǃ Планируете ли вы еще марки заливать на Склад? Особенности некоторых марок практически невозможно показать при съемке их обычным сканером, а вот снимки фотоаппаратом могут решить эту проблему. --Matsievsky (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Пока не планировал что-то ещё загружать из марок. Только если появятся новые материалы или буду разбирать архивы --Butko (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

ex-Category:Cities and villages in France

Hello,

I just noticed (bit late) the change of name from that one to "Category:Localities of cities and villages in France". This new name looks like it's been thought of by a non-native Engl. speaker, which wld be beside the point:

  • if it didn't turn out quite heavier-sounding than the previous title (but that's the least of it);
  • if it didn't make it that much harder to find because the new name is quasi impossible to think of for whoever hasn't seen it before - which implies that some photos do not receive the category they correspond to;
  • and by the same principle if it didn't make it more difficult to remember;
  • if the novelty did not stop at adding a redundancy in the title, thus skipping the usefulness of adding any information.

So. Out of (somewhat shocked) curiosity, could you please explain the rationale behind changing the name of all these categories to names that are longer, heavier in the mouth, not quite english thus harder to find and harder to remember, all that (and that much work) for something that appears to be worse in all regards? I am quite appalled, so thanks for the info, I would much like to understand. Basicdesign (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I've renamed Category:Cities and villages in France to Category:Populated places in France. That's all. Aim was unification of names in Category:Populated places by country. I didn't create categories Localities of cities and village... --Butko (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Две гашеные марки

Здравствуйтеǃ Имеется 2 скана одной и той же гашеной марки, физически марки разныеː 1 и 2, 1-я ваша. Сканы одинакового очень большого разрешения. Но по качеству разные. Нужно ли их оба оставить, или один из них можно перезалить качественным сканом чистой марки (мой скан с разрешением в 2 раза ниже)? --Matsievsky (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Думаю, лучше загрузить отдельным файлом, а там сравнить можно будет --Butko (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
1) Если чистую марку загрузить отдельным файлом, то в случае, если одна из двух гашеных будет потом удаляться, получится лишняя нагрузка на участников. 2) Также при перезаливке гашеной марки чистой гашеная марка как бы останется под чистой на странице. 3) Кроме того, тогда возникнет еще одно лишнее стандартное переименование, связанное с png-форматом, которого не будет в случае перезаливки. Так что, заливать третий файл? --Matsievsky (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Не видя картинки мне сложно сказать как лучше. Если картинка смотрится лучше моей, то можно и поверх залить, а если при этом и разрешение не будет уменьшено, то однозначно да --Butko (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Извиняюсь, плохо оформил ссылки на картинки. Они в цифрах 1 и 2 в начале обсуждения. Повторюː 1-я гашеная марка и 2-я гашеная марка, чистой марки пока нет. --Matsievsky (talk) 20:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Это я понял. Исходя из этого я и отвечал --Butko (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
В общем, на Ваше усмотрение. Оба способа имеют плюсы и минусы, а переделать всегда можно --Butko (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Да, запутался я. Вот, перезалилː 1-я гашеная марка. --Matsievsky (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
В этой серии еще 3 марки, 3 пары сканов с гашеными марками. Ситуация точно такая же, марки такие же. С вашего разрешения, тоже перезалью. --Matsievsky (talk) 20:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Ok. Только хорошо бы её немножко повернуть, чтобы была ровная. Сейчас правая сторона выше левой. Это проще сделать пока фон не обрезан по зубчики --Butko (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Спасибо за ценное замечаниеǃ Полагал, что на повороты менее полградуса можно внимания не обращать... Вырежу сначала png-формат из архива, у меня скан с серией марок... --Matsievsky (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Вырезки из марок

Здравствуйте, Butko. Можете ответить мне на этот вопрос? --Interfase (talk) 08:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

На мой взгляд, вырезки защищены авторским правом, т.к. они уже не являются знаком почтовой оплаты. А как юристы законы интерпретируют - я не знаю --Butko (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
ОК. Спасибо. --Interfase (talk) 08:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Поставил вопрос на обсуждение на w:ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское право#Вырезки из марок. --Matsievsky (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
В продолжение темы. А если марка подретуширована, то есть рисунок марки изменен, например, подправлен фон изображения, то марка остается маркой, то есть подлежит свободному распространению? --Matsievsky (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Ретушь ретуши рознь. Если это было просто улучшение качества, то всё остаётся как было. А если оригинальный фон марки поменяли, на фон из другого изображения, то непонятно зачем это нужно на Викискладе --Butko (talk) 07:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Вот пока единственный замеченный мной случай с полной (необрезанной) маркой. Оригинальная марка имеет фон как бы с "осыпавшейся краской". Рисунок "осыпания" совершенно одинаковый и на блоке, и во всех каталогах. Кстати, другая марка этой серии тоже с "осыпанием" краски. На складе есть вами "подретушированная" марка, которую мне посоветовали оставить (я ее сгоряча перезалил, пришлось по-новой загружать). Может, удалить ее? --Matsievsky (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Подкатегории

Здравствуйтеǃ Если у категории А есть подкатегория Б, то изображения из Б обычно не помещают в А, а если помещают, то из А могут их удалить. А если еще у Б есть подкатегория В, то изображения могут находиться одновременно в А и В? --Matsievsky (talk) 18:41, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

В этом случае тоже могут оставить только в В, т.к. будет считаться, что файл уже и так есть в А (А → Б → В). А вот, например, если а А есть подкатегории Б и Г, то файл одновременно может быть и в Б и в Г. --Butko (talk) 07:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Я на систему Б и Г и перехожу. Но такой случай, что Г обычно полностью (а иногда частично) есть в Б. --Matsievsky (talk) 09:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Фото путешествия по Беларуси 276.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 08:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Бот в Украинской Википедии

Здравствуйте! У вашего бота есть флаг в Украинской Википедии, однако аккаунт неактивен уже три с половиной года. До 2011 года бот занимался интервики, что сейчас неактуально. Собираетесь ли вы в будущем использовать бота в УкрВики? Если нет, то возражаете ли вы против снятия флага из-за неактивности? --Aced (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Бот удобен когда нужно сделать много однотипных правок и я заранее не могу сказать когда такая возможность понадобится. К тому же, насколько я понимаю, в украинской Википедии это скорее политический вопрос, чем технический и мои возражения роли не сыграют --Butko (talk) 07:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Переименование марок

Здравствуйтеǃ Первый раз отказали в переименовании файлов с изображениями гашеных марок. Причем в именах нет ни каталога, ни номера по каталогу. Вот один из файловː Борьба. Не переименовали 4 марки из серии 5 марок, причем пятую перед этим переименовал другой участник. Что посоветуете делать? Выставить на повторное переименование? --Matsievsky (talk) 10:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

@Matsievsky: Your request is violating the language policy. Pleas don't ask to rename such files. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: , I am forbidden to rename these files to any names? --Matsievsky (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
@Matsievsky: Imho no need to give all maps a long english name. Please establish consensus before doing/requesting such changes. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: , I give identical names to identical stamps. It is bad? And do establish consensus with author of the files Butko? I have established consensus with Billinghurst already . --Matsievsky (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
And why a long name? Three files have only two words in the name section "Shot description" - only one word is less... --Matsievsky (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015

Вітаємо!

З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»

Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015

Вітаємо!

З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 10:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Категории в подкатегориях

Здравствуйтеǃ Вопрос такойː а если в категории А есть подкатегория Б, а в них обеих - подкатегория В, то одну из категорий В можно удалить? --Matsievsky (talk) 12:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

В общем случае, та В, что в А будет избыточной. Например, если категория Марки 2000 года находится в категории Марки по годам, то в категории Марки она уже лишняя --
Спасибо, я так и предполагал. --Matsievsky (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)