User talk:Banfield/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Statue of Liberty made with LEGO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 13:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Hola queria avisarte que te deje una respuesta a tu solicitud de borrado en Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Argentina_500_pesos_back_2016.jpg espero haber seguido todos los requerimientos o lineamientos para realizar una respuesta en contra de una solicitud de borrado, aunque por falta de experiencia quizas pueda tener errores, si le prestaras atencion principalmente al fondo del asunto y no a como realize el... ¿descargo? estaria yo agradecido, y cualquier inconcistencia en la manera o forma, me la hagas saber para corregirla, muchas gracias, Saludos --WiZaRd SaiLoR (talk) 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hola, una pregunta relacionada pero en realidad generica, si un empleado del gobierno nacional o trabajador contratado a tal fin es comicionado por un gobierno para que les realize un diseño o tome una foto, como puede ser un billete o el logo de casa rosada o el logo para el link de youtube de la casa rosada que publica en su pagina con licencia CC BY 2.5 AR
segun vos esa foto o diseño no podria ser libre por mas que el contenido de la pagina este licenciada con CC BY 2.5 AR?
quizas pueda ser como meterme la llave en la nariz, pero, un buen ejemplo de eso, es una foto, de la escultura que representa a un personaje de historieta como lo puede ser clemente. cuya foto creada para y proveniente de la pagina del gobierno de la ciudad de buenos aires (CC BY 2.5 AR) ahi quien es el titular de derechos de autor de la imagen que yo subi? caloi? el escultor? el gobierno de la ciudad de buenos aires que encargo y compro la realización de dicho diseño y luego de emplazarla en la via publica dentro de su territorio la mando fotografiar?
es un terreno complicado querer atribuir a terceras personas los derechos de un gobierno el gobierno esta formado por personas, empleados y contratados para realizar determinados trabajos PARA el gobierno.
a que me refiero? a esto que YO subi [1] y a esto otro que yo tambien subi [2] asi como cientos (o mas) de otras imagenes subidas con licencias CC por el gobierno de la republica argentina (casarosada) y el gobierno de la ciudad autonoma de buenos aires. en sus respectivas paginas oficiales.
te pongo como ejemplo esas imagenes que yo subi, para no involucrar a terceros, pero lo hago teniendo la seguridad que son totalmente correctas y legales de subir a commons. y que no hacen otra cosa que beneficiar a la :las personas teneras disponibles tal como se publicaron con sus licencias libres en sus sitios oficiales.
Commons no esta infringiendo ninguna ley al alojar contenido publicado con licencia CC BY 2.5 AR, y la imagen de muestra que yo subi asi como las 2 fotos que aqui mismo de buena fe te especifico no pueden en nincun caso estar violando ninguna ley Argentina por haber sido publicadas mediante dicha licencia, el caso de ejemplo que vos comentas, seria un caso diferente a menos que el gobierno le encomendara realizar un trabajo a Picasso para dicho gobierno y luego publicara el trabajo en su sitio web. lo cual seria diferente a simplemente tomar una imagen de la web de un cuadro de picasso y publicarla en el sitio de casa rosada. lo que no es el caso aqui cabe recordar que si picaso realiza un diseño trabajando para el gobierno de la republica argentina, y el gobierno no diera el dato que el diseño lo realizo picasso, es otro caso diferente tambien. --WiZaRd SaiLoR (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
WiZaRd SaiLoR: Una obra o escultura emplazada en la vía pública no está en dominio público en Argentina, así la haya encargado el gobierno nacional, municipal o quien fuera. Es titular quien la diseñó. Y la foto de Clemente que mencionás tampoco correspondería que permanezca en Commmons, porque es la reproducción de una obra protegida. La foto, como tal, está con licencia CC, pero la escultura sigue estando protegida y es incompatible. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 16:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Desbloqueo de página de discusión

Hola Banfield, perdona el tono de mis anteriores mensajes. Supongo que puedes entender que estuviese frustrado por esta discusión circular ("solicita el desbloqueo en tu página", "la página está bloqueada"). Como creo que te ha comentado un compañero común, me gustaría poder solicitar mi desbloqueo. Sin embargo, no puedo hacerlo porque mi página de discusión está bloqueada (o yo no puedo editar en mi página de discusión, que tiene el mismo efecto). No creo que ese bloqueo esté basado en política alguna y por eso te solicito que desbloquees mi página (y me des los permisos para editar en ella, concretamente en la del usuario Discasto). De antemano, muchas gracias --Discasto talk 12:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Muchas gracias :-) Me atrevo a pedirte que desbloquees la página de Discasto. Ecemaml ya no es mi cuenta principal y no la uso en ningún proyecto. Un cordial saludo y, de nuevo, gracias --Discasto talk 14:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hola Banfield, ¿podrías desproteger mi página de discusión? Aunque puedo técnicamente editar mi página de discusión, resulta estár protegida (aquí) y, consecuentemente, no puedo editar en ella. Gracias --Discasto talk 15:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
¡¡¡Muchas gracias!!! :-) --Discasto talk 15:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AHeneen (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AHeneen (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of picture

Hi Banfield. Today you notified me of the proposed deletion of the File:Bosque Arrayanes setiembre 2011 01.JPG. You put as reason "Personal picture, not in use, out of scope." Which are the Wikipedia rules stating that this file should be deleted? Thanks for your time. Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for answering in my profile. I am reading some information. Please see this about personal information: "a limited amount of personal information (perhaps a short biography) and a freely licensed tasteful personal photograph or two are usually allowed". So... isn't this a contradiction regarding the proposal of deleting my picture...?
Gracias, Banfield. Entiendo, hay diferentes políticas al respecto según en qué proyecto estés activo. OK. Saludos, --Fadesga (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
File:PRO Vandalismo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cambalachero (talk) 18:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Hola Banfield, vi que eres el creador de este artículo. Subí una foto. No es muy buena, pero quizá podrías usarla para ilustrar el artículo. A tu juicio. Un saludo --Discasto talk 17:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Che, pero la imagen mia era de antes del 2010. Bah, no estoy 100% seguro, porque no puedo ver el historial de la pagina. :( MarianoC (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Ahi le pregunté al admin que la borró: la foto fue subida en 2006, bastante antes que la fecha de esa campaña, así que seguro no eran de esas. Estoy hablando con el admin para ver si la restaura. MarianoC (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Cambiar de nombre un archivo

Veo que tu tu tienes "file mover rights" en Wikimedia Commons, por favor cambia el nombre de este archivo y ponle este nombre: File:El_Mencho_.jpg

la razón del cambio de nombre es que hay dos archivos con el mismo nombre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Master545445 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

TE ESTAS EQUIVOCANDO BORRANDO FOTOS

LAS FOTOS QUE ESTAS BORRANDO DE LA PAGINA SON NUEVAS Y NO TIENEN NINGÚN COPYRIGHT, VAS A SER DENUNCIADO POR VANDALISMO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ale 18 juarez (talk • contribs) 20:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Renewallogo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CentreLeftRight 21:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Desbloqueo página de discusión.

Buenas noches o buenas tardes,

quería preguntarte si era posible que desprotegieras mi página de discusión (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusión:A4exocet) y la prohibición de editarla en mi bloqueo para así poder solicitar mi desbloqueo nuevamente dado a que ha pasado más de un año desde mi última solicitud efectiva, eso o si era posible en su defecto que plantearas mi caso en la lista de correos de los bibliotecarios o en algún otro lado para que mi solicitud pudiera ser considerada esta vez,

gracias desde ya y te deseo un buen comienzo de año próximo y fin de éste,

saludos----A4exocet (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC).

Pay attention to copyright
File:Elecciones Argentina.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright © Tribunal Electoral del Chubut
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yilku1 (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Elecciones Argentina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Cayman Islas Moneda Anverso.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle de Esquel, provincia del Chubut (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Ayer nomás - Los Gatos - Vinilo simple.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 02:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


File:LOGO + MUNICIPALIDAD.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Meno25.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)