Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising NawlinWiki (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joan Miro died in 1983. FOP in Spain applies to "Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares", so museums seems to be excluded. BrightRaven (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totally true. I've been talking with the museum that owns the work, and they are considering to permit a CC copyleft. Meanwhile, It would be better to delete the file. Thanks for your comment! ; )

I do not think the museum can grant any authorization to publish this work. Only Miro's legal successor can do it. BrightRaven (talk) 13:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, low quality => no use Antemister (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyrighted and on a page on the English Wikipedia which is nominated for speedy deletion. -- Luke (Talk) 01:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of black tree trunks against an underexposed sky, no location, no description, no categories and not in use, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Image from here, dated January 28th, 2014 – marked "Copyright © 2014 Bubblews L.L.C." Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, relatively small size, nice resolution, but the Description & Name of this file indicate pranking or hoaxing and out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Image from here. No evidence of copyright holder on that page which is a fan tribute to this racer who had just passed away. Post there is sourced and dated " Last edited by Shawnny; 05-20-2010 at 05:14 AM. " Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, notice the contact info above the summary. Image previously published here, marked "© SIA Ask.fm 2014". Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: no permission, see COM:OTRS Krd 18:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is this? See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Image from [[[COM:COPYVIO]]: Image from http://hotspicyupdates.blogspot.com/2013/08/shreya-ghoshal-latest-spicy-hot-twitter.html here], marked © 2013 Latest High Quality Images of Bollywood and South Indian Actresses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution and missing meta data makes this unlikely to be user's own work but a possible COM:COPYVIO. Image is similar to this one suggesting it may come from a meme or wallpaper site. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, Image from here, page is marked copyright for webpage, says content copyright remains with creators. No indication that this uploader is original creator. No metadata. Polemic Description and no date. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found here surrounded by a type of advertisement that suggests this page is not an official Japanese Government website. It reads "LAST UPDATE 2001,08,04(FirstUp 2000,08,30)", far earlier than this upload which is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of no potential educational or encyclopedic value, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused and the uploader is probably not the photographer Natuur12 (talk) 19:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: see COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (the holiday is in-scope, a self-created "card" celebrating it probably isn't). Also concerns about source of the multiple images used as its basis. Ubcule (talk) 20:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Might also be a copyvio (the low resolution backs this up) but I can't be sure as other uses found on web could theoretically have been transferred from here since it was uploaded. Ubcule (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 23:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of e.g. this picture, while the uuploader claims it is own work. The user has recive a 'last warning' for vandalism on enwp and will most likely be blocked if one more cas of vandalism. Josve05a (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of a project scope Alan (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is Commons now here as a venue for free advertising? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: spam. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrea chinca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look like own work; no EXIF. Tineye does not find anything. Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small files without metadata. All the user's uploads have the same problem. In addition, they are very out of project scope. Some of them are text-only files in .jpg-format. All files are unused. I delete them all as out of scope, files consisting photos are maybe copyright violations also. Taivo (talk) 08:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small ‎(280×73 pixels), unused, the uploader's only contribution, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope personal image (comment "added image for use on page" must refer to deleted en.wikipedia article- see here- as it's no longer in use). Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. The quality is bad: image does not show the loveliness of fair maiden Jessica. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The dog image is- without any further information- pretty much out of scope.

The images of the ship are duplicates and both low-resolution with a circular frame. The description on "Unknown 3" translates as "ship" but *I* could have told you that. Small scale, framing and near-complete lack of information render these of low educational value and borderline out-of-scope for that reason.

Ubcule (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small files without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Quality is bad, descriptions are inadequate. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description translates as ""The is a concrete plant," said a wise man named Timo". Increasing the image brightness shows some noise that suggests it's an actual photo, but there's just noise there, so it's still useless. Ubcule (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, we have better photos about concrete plants. Actually the file seems totally black for me. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tinyeye comes back with 230 results, not own work. Mjrmtg (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Likely copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tinyeye comes back with 7 results, not own work Mjrmtg (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope PierreSelim (talk) 06:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:15, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope and/or unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (or misused) personal image. Was formerly used as part of CV at this en.wikipedia user page, but since that was blatant misuse of facilities by non-contributor, that page has been blanked and this image may now be removed from Commons. Ubcule (talk) 23:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Unused personal image out of scope russavia (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only page in the File namespace. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 08:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 23:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 00:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly copyrighted and not "own work", see http://www.sashfactor.info/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7628&start=20#p120481 Ies (talk) 06:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by High Contrast. Yann (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo says the author is different from the uploader; no info on what the picture is about. Ymblanter (talk) 09:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:24, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, low resolution, no exif data 4ing (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and/or unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Indeedous (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of the portrait; no evidence that the portrait is free. ireas (talk) 20:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 21:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Indeedous (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (uploaded from mobile, but seems not to be taken with a mobile device; no EXIF data); no meaningful description → no educational use ireas (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


No, our picture is larger, both height and width. Our picture extends farther up (more space above the head), farther down (ours has the feet), and ours even extends farther to the sides (the top right text reads "BOA" on ours, merely "BO" on theirs. It is not possible for our picture to be a cropped version of theirs, while the reverse might be possible. All that said getting an OTRS permission isn't actually a bad idea...--GRuban (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, our picture can’t be a crop of the Twitter profile picture. But that picture can’t be a crop of our picture either. That’s the reason why I’d like to have an OTRS permission. Regards, --ireas (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please send evidence of permission to com:OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 14:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Indeedous (talk) 23:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. ireas (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Indeedous (talk) 23:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image ireas (talk) 21:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2014 - Livingly Media, Inc 27.253.89.142 04:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused animated signature gif -- out of scope .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the author as said in the watermark; therefore a permission according to COM:OTRS is required. ireas (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image, no educational use. ireas (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. ireas (talk) 10:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; unused personal image, no educational use, low quality ireas (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image, low quality. ireas (talk) 10:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 10:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry photo (or out of aspect ratio?), no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Runner1928 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2d works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited File:46th Street Light Rail sign and advertisements.jpg so that it satisfies Commons requirements. But File:46th Street Light Rail sig.jpg is a duplicate file and can be deleted. Runner1928 (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: now text only, no artwork. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Runner1928 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern artworks without permission from artists.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that File:Brauer Museum of Art during student art show 01.jpg and File:Brauer Museum of Art during student art show 02.jpg are problematic, and I will refrain from uploading images like these in the future. I do not necessarily agree with deletion of File:San Francisco Museum of Modern Art staircase.jpg. The purpose of this image is to illustrate the staircase, and in the image the artwork occupies perhaps 20% of the image and furthermore is occluded. But I do see that the majority of the artwork is visible, and the image is high resolution and so even a portion of the total image serves as a reproduction of most of the artwork. Runner1928 (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: On the staircase -- if it were a really great image, I might push the envelope and keep it. But it's not -- it's a very difficult subject and this doesn;t really show it well. The image is also a difficult shape for most uses. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a derivative of the 2 logos. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clue as to who this "celebrity" is, unless that's his actual name. Probable out-of-scope and/or unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional fluff (out-of-scope and/or unused personal image). Ubcule (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:23, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:23, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:23, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Congratulations! (unused private image, out of scope.) Indeedous (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (no idea who this is) and/or unused personal Ubcule (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image or missing essential information Indeedous (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as it is unusable due to low quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like an unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete unless the uploader is Photo/Photographer Lorenzo Mollicone (Alchemy Imageworks) this is a copyvio that is incorrectly sourced Ww2censor (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This needs a confirmation to OTRS by Mr. Mollicone. De728631 (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete In addition to the reasons already specified, my understanding is that our policies preclude images that have another organization's commercial logo watermarked on them (as this one does, bottom left). So even if that OTRS permission were properly filed, it would have to be on an unwatermarked version, not on this version. Bearcat (talk) 22:45, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per discussion Krd 16:40, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, unused (private) image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; just go to Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom, also probable attack image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; low-quality selfie. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate to File:ABC Family logo.svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; sorry, Girls, Commons is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; please; Commons is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; Facebook is for selfies, not Commons. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted software Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of no realistic educational application. Also, Commons is not a free web host Rrburke (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of dubious educational value... out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No realistic educational application, so out of project scope. Copyright suspect: appears to have been downloaded from random website Rrburke (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the daily low qualiy penis image without any possible educational use. We don't need every day new low quality penis self shots by exhebitionists - Commons is not the right place for that. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Target file File:Penis 2014-04-07 15-48.jpg
Pixel resolution = 3264 x 2448
Source category: Erect human penis (filter by mime 'image')
Total number of unique images in category, 5 child and 5 grandchild categories: 884
Number with pixel >= target resolution: 172 (in top 19%)
Number with file size >= target file size: 221 (in top 25%)
Report completed: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:47 (27.6s runtime)

Deleted: per discussion: no additional educational use, out of scope Krd 10:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by McCloney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo/fan photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deawromyfutsal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo not legitimately in use, lacking realistic educational application; out of project scope Rrburke (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screencap of unknown origin; implausible claim of "own work". Should be deleted according to the precautionary principle. See, e.g., http://video.agaclip.com/w=ahKuNXWH7cE --Rrburke (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Uploaded for use in deleted hoax article en:Roman Kalethic Church JohnCD (talk) 17:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation (www.chroniclelive.co.uk/whats-on/john-newman-o2-academy-newcastle-6644323) Ed (Edgar181) 17:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been brought to my attention that this is not a free image and is probably not the own work of the uploader - the same image can be seen here with a note saying "John Ross ©". 97198 (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Either copyright violation, or we need OTRS Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (no EXIF information, small resolution). ireas (talk) 10:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: http://www.bubblegumdancer.com/artist.php?id=86 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work of a grammar book. ireas (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal images

ireas (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no educational use ireas (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Studio Gangster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: no educational use

ireas (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 11:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable screencap of copyrighted broadcast. Comments here seem to indicate that the source photo was published at least a week before being uploaded here (Google Translate suggests the first comment is from 18 March). Storkk (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:10, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metrobtv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside project scope nonnotable stations

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metrobtv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamelalsoultan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 16:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dre constant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2287661/Jessica-Raine-new-partner-Tom-Goodman-Hill-Dont-midwife--shes-married-man.html discospinster (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: (c) by dailymail Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/education/photo_gallery_beccles_free_school_opens_to_pupils_1_1506930 discospinster (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: (c) vio: Picture: James Bass Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; no educational value, not even indicated who the picture is of Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Looks like to be derivated from a printed magazine. Gunnex (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Dfdgffr" uploaded by Rtsgyv thenkgubfic: out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I do not see advertizing. Actually I do not see anything recognizable. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jje985 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Attack/hoax images used on the enWiki BLP en:Ha Ha Clinton-Dix

Storkk (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]