Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2021-1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 13 Eleven 2004 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All seems to be non-free screenshots of movies.

CptViraj (talk) 05:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 23:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cropped this image but orientation is not the same as preview Pratyk321 (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: image was rotated meanwhile. --Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Nepal: non-free (2010) statue.

Eleassar (t/p) 09:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can any one suggest me is there any solution for this? What if I obtain any letter from the owner of the statue? is there any format of such letter? -Krish Dulal (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This would be appreciated, however the permission to freely license these photos should be obtained from the sculptor (author) of the statue, not from the owner. Please follow the guidelines at COM:OTRS. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See prior discussion. Unveiled in 1992 and built/designed by Kamal Jain, CEO of Hilltake Group of Companies. Lest Nepal's copyright law is changed to allow commercial use of images of copyrighted artistic works without artists' prior authorization.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue was completed in 2010. There is no freedom of panorama in Nepal, permission from the creator is needed as he/she is unlikely to be dead for 50 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. For those that might be COM:DM, the other subjects are out of COM:Scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Looks like the court of the museum. Every architectural element is de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 20:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:FOP Yemen -akko (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a derivative work without information of the original work. sB talk 13:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Own work" seems very unlikely, looks like a scan from a book. --91.34.38.171 15:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This photo, taken in Israel, is over 50 years old, which as far as I am aware, puts it in the public domain. It was supplied by the author of a book on Nechama Leibowitz.--Gilabrand (talk) 08:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gilabrand labeling as "own work" was clearly incorrect, and unfortunately you are mistaken about public domain. See Commons:Copyright_rules#Copyright_rules_by_territory. Copyright is life+70 in general, ranging up to life+100 in about five countries. Almost nothing is Public Domain unless the author died prior to 1951 (unless explicitly released as public domain, or US-govt work which is declared public domain, or other rare exceptions). That copyright length is arguably excessive and absurd, but absurd law is still law. Alsee (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, Delete from commons as copyrighted, unless we receive licensing from the copyright owner. However it is likely possible to local-upload to EnWiki and some other specific wikis that have a compatible EDP which allow fair use of copyrighted content under certain restrictions. Alsee (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, false license, false authorship claim, no indication of actual free license provided. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry to see that this photo was deleted. The professor in question died many years ago and has no family. She was an important figure in Israel, whose work continues to resound until today. Someone who wrote a book about her provided me with the photo, which I cropped a bit. There is no one who can provide another photo and there is no question that whoever took this one, probably in the 1950s, is no longer living. So does a person who has no family deserve to be forgotten and have no one know what they looked like because of some absurd copyright law?Gilabrand (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, Demonstrably free licensed status is a primary requirement here on Wikimedia Commons. Whether copyright laws might sometimes be "absurd" or not, we are bound to follow them to the best of our abilities here. I'll also note that you uploaded the photo with multiple false claims. As to importance regardless of license status, you may wish to check at en:Wikipedia if it could be used in an article under "non-free fair use" status. Otherwise, there are a great number of other places on the internet where photos can be uploaded. Thanks for your attention, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tallinn TV Tower was built in 1980. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period (usually 70 years) of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is considered as a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so therefore we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Unfortunately, Estonia has no Commons-acceptable FoP.

A1Cafel (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Due to COM:VPC#Estonia is a country where FOP is not OK but still have, I'm not sure if what's the actual situation of this country. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
JWilz, I'm afraid that @Jklamo: disagree with you, they think that all TV towers are utilitarian buildings that should always allowed even in FOP Notok countries (at least, per Special:Diff/554535249). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deleted most, per nomination, because there is no COM:FOP Estonia. The argument this tower is utiliatrian might be true, but imho this does not mean it is not a work of architecture. Photos of work architecture made in Estonia cannot be maintained on Commons. Therefore according to the law in Estionia, photos prominently showing the tower should be deleted. kept two images. One could be cropped, the rest of the image is maintained, the uncropped version is deleted. The other photo only shows a technical detail of the tower, which I consider not architecture. Elly (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same source as this. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted: This file was also mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hande-Erçel.jpg but closing admin didn't notice it. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]