Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2019-34

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Hayden+Byerly/Muppets+Most+Wanted+Premieres+Hollywood+Part/Bp1pJFix5tV Okki (talk) 13:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Storkk at 08:18, 14 August 2019 UTC: Likely copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 13:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

R2-D2 is a copyrighted design, so these images are not yet able to be hosted on Commons.

russavia (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe these two be derivatives of a copyrighted character, and therefore, subject to copyright.

Themightyquill (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted R2D2 is a copyrighted character. There are additional images in this category which could be checked/nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:R2-D2 (10585062134).jpg (COM:TOYS)

Josve05a (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I have included File:Maker Faire 2007 - S2-D2 (508247085).jpg in the deletions because it is not useful with the large areas of pixelation in the middle. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

R2-D2 is a copyrighted work.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • About a decade ago someone nominated a whole whack of pictures of model cars for deletion - you know the ones that are children's toys. The nomination claimed that a picture of a toy Mustang car violated a copyright. I can't remember for sure now, but I think they were claiming the pictures of the model violated Mattel's copyright, not the copyright of the Ford Motor Company. The strange thing is that no one objects to pictures of actual Mustang cars, just to models of them. I find that counter-intuitive.
  • I put the three R2D2 costumes I uploaded into a cosplay category. So, when someone takes a picture of someone wearing a Wonder Woman costume, or a Spiderman costume, are they violating a copyright? Is the person who makes themself a Wonder Woman or Spiderman costume violating a copyright? If those pictures violate a copyright, is it the copyright of Marvel, or of the amateur costume maker?
  • Is someone going to argue these arguments apply to the images in Category:Cosplay of Bender (Futurama)? Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: most of these are costumes made by fans. If I understand your argumentation this picture should be deleted because it is a derivated work, but not this one which is also a derivated work made in lego. The only difference is the building material. --Cody escadron delta (d) 05:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to submit a DR about it, you can do it. I am not obligated to submit DRs for all copyvios files, and I won't stop you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: you absolutely not answer to me. --Cody escadron delta (d) 06:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete These seem like obvious copyright violations here. Some kid in a cardboard box painted blue and white would be a stretch for deletion, but all the ones I looked at above are near exact copies. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussions above. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

DMacks (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I was careful to only pick files that actually contained (in my view) a substantial and clear image of R2-D2, rather than de minimis, merely relating to it, or something so stylized that it was not a DW of that specific robot. For the file you mention, it appears so clearly to be this subject as a substantive part of this image, even though it's redrawn by hand; see Commons:Fan art#Copyright in fan art. One could replace it with a different generic/free robot, but one could not simply crop it out altogether. DMacks (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: almost all, per nomination, except for the one released by the Star Wars account on Flickr. --Rosenzweig τ 01:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some sort of personal artwork. Unused file. Out of Scope Malcolma (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MasumRezanalta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Or please upload the whole image. Ras67 (talk) 21:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published at https://archive.alahednews.com.lb/details.php?id=145500, needs permission Ytoyoda (talk) 02:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character. [1] Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One person has red lanyard Liridon (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That person is OK with this photo. --Didym (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Or please upload the whole image.

Ras67 (talk) 00:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the uploads were incomplete/damaged due to my phone going out of wifi range while attempting an upload. I'll try to re-upload them when I have a chance :( WhisperToMe (talk) 16:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your efforts, i've seen that there are still other demaged photos on your uploads. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 01:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random numbers and text in file. Possibly oos. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: advertising. P 1 9 9   19:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope? Advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose. Not used. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]