Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2018-3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution of this file. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without any use for Wikipedia projects. Neither Commons is a place to host selfies, except for Wikipedists who want to show their face on their user pages. SuZumiya (talk) 07:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 23:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IamAnisurrahman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appear to be COM:NETCOPYVIOs. For example, File:Darul Uloom Ishatul Islam Battagram.jpg was uploaded 4. May 2016. That image, however, appeared here 16. November 2013, more than two years prior to your upload, in a higher resolution, and with someone else's authorship credit (overridden in the Commons version). File:Beautiful Battagram.jpg, as another example, is merely a colorshifted and resized version of this from tripmondo, where it was credited to Majid khan. All images consequently in doubt, and indeed are generally low resolution, have telling visual artifacts (e.g. misalignment at the bottom of File:Shingli Payeen 2014.jpg) and lack camera EXIF.

Эlcobbola talk 22:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unlikely to have any educational use. --ghouston (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a problem 223.176.89.227 11:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image, file with same filename has been deleted before for same reason. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 20:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Fanghong. --Didym (talk) 21:38, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a problem 223.176.89.227 11:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image, file with same filename has been deleted before for same reason. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 20:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Fanghong. --Didym (talk) 21:38, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/25025709_908771699290659_6267852616382808064_n.jpg. However, it seems likely to me that the uploader is the copyright holder, since anyone can use an Instagram account, and the image isn't widely disseminated, and the uploader has a similar name as the watermark. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Magog the Ogre. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Magog. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one more image related to this old request. He added it to my own and other user categories as well (I removed that already) DerFussi 06:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shrinivaskulkarni1388

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs celebrities. Missing EXIF data. Unlikely to be Own work.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

your opinions are asked : batch of 25 (rather) personal files of a Dipavali celebration, and personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??

Roland zh (talk) 01:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: Some, as per [1]. Yann (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images (en:Ramkumar Shedge).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete photos

[edit]

hello, these photos are the stills clicked by me on movie based government project beti bachao beti padhao, uploaded someone will use it films article, but yes if you feel it has no Wikipedia value then please delete it. Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person with useless description, clearly not related to any of the categories added by the uploader. BD2412 T 14:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:مراكش 2.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farouk oujjair (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be 3D artworks - in Morocco, no Freedom of Panorama when artwork is main subject.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farouk oujjair (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Larger or higher-quality versions of (obviously the same or related) images are available (checking via Google Images) and apparently predate their upload here. This strongly suggests that they are not uploader's work as claimed. If these are freely-usable for any other reason (i.e. not copyrightable), then the reason must be stated explicitly here.

Translation: تتوفر نسخ أكبر أو ذات جودة أعلى (من البديهي أنها نفس الصور أو متقاربة) وموجودة في مواقع أخرى قبل أن يتم تحميلها هنا. هذا يشير حتما إلى أنها ليست عملك الخاص كما هو مشار إليه في وصف الصور.

.إذا كانت هذه الملفات قابلة للاستغلال بحرية لأي سبب آخر (على سبيل المثال لا حقوق الطبع والنشر)، يجب ذكر السبب بوضوح

Ubcule (talk) 20:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nabil Mahbub Khan Nader (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaurav sharma Evolution (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. No educational value. Unused personal image.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused COM:SELFIE. HyperGaruda (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough data to check freedom of panorama Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. No FOP in Afghanistan for the internal of the mosque. Ruthven (msg) 22:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, Gasa Aliro. Seems to be a Twitter profile pic of someone by the name Abd-al-Rahman al-Jar‘î. An uncropped version popped up in 2012, before it was uploaded here in 2013. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Heather Hensley (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Dyolf77 at 17:54, 31 Dezember 2017 UTC: Out of project scope - --Krdbot 01:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has two problems. At first, this is small unused personal file and the uploader's only contribution, out of project scope. At second, collages need source and license for every used image, probably copyright violation too. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Jithil is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: wasn't able to find a copy on the net. File is in use. Ruthven (msg) 22:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Currency#Hong_Kong Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal selfie/image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]