Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2018-14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test 6.jpg

[edit]

Image was uploaded to test the android app. It can now be deleted.

Deleted: uploaders request of a recently uploaded, unused file. --JuTa 16:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test 6.jpg

[edit]

Please delete this image. This was just a test by me - to review the Android App. HaBer21 (talk) 14:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test 6.jpg

[edit]

Maybe too unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diamond 2.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Batch of 9 files uploaded by Justjainz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

your opinions ared asked : batch of 9 unused small-sized files, but also personality/copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??

Roland zh (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avion 4.jpg

[edit]

Too dark to serve anything. There are better images of the building. E4024 (talk) 08:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wilson Gómez Arias Productor y director de cine y Tv de Colombia - 2014-04-20 07-07.jpg

[edit]

Low possibility of educational reuse, as subject is really not visible at all seb26 (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW, permission required

Didym (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - except two images whose copyrightable content is De Minimis, and one image cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that picture has been ever published. Original source, please.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

as indicated in all files. The original author is unknown. All photos are in public domain in Egypt. The first photo for example was published by Ismail Serageldin (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismail_Serageldin) grandson of Dr Ali Ibrahim at his official page on Facebook. I think Facebook and Twitter are treated as pintrust and other websites. Again all the photos have unknown author are in public domain in Egypt. It's practically nearly impossible to reach the original author for my capacity. I have made all efforts to try to teach other sources or the author, but didn't succeed. Kindly, unless you can find an original source or data about the author, it is unfair to delete it. Don't delete based on suspicion. Photos are in public domain in Egypt. Regards,--Ashashyou (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ashashyou: An image published 2013 is not public domain in Egypt. If published earlier please provide evidence by modifying the source. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The person in the photo has died in 1947. The photos depicted him in official Royal uniform. He was not allowed to wear such a uniform before being appointed as a minister of health. He served as minister of health between 1940-1941. The photo has been shot anytime between 1940-1947. That is what i mean. The author of the photo is the one who shot the photo, not the one who has put it online. The photographer is unknown. So according to Egyptian law it is in public domain. You can check {{PD-Egypt}} for end of copyright of unknown authors. Regards. --Ashashyou (talk) 16:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No there's a confusion betweed creation and publication: Egyptian law and template above you refer to always talks about publication, not creation and there's no evidence that image has been published before 2013 so please have Ismail Serageldin sending a permission via COM:OTRS since it's quite likely he inherited of this picture. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence that the photo was publicized before 2013 is that the person in the photo has died in 1947 and has signed it in 1946. The photo was taken inbetween 1940 and 1946.--Ashashyou (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of publication prior to 2013, which is required by COM:PUB. --ƏXPLICIT 03:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING.

Ruthven (msg) 15:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajaya samantaraya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, not in use, personal image.

— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashokrajpurohit36 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, not in use, personal images.

— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clemente .jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal selfies and photos. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal webhost.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, unused, out of project scope. No educational value.

— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jitesh kasera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

[[ Jitesh kasera is commerce student

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boldburner (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 15:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farhankhan48242 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).

hiàn 15:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal selfies and photos. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal webhost.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoyeb Ahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, unused, out of project scope. No educational value.

— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monu9226 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope, and see COM:NOTHOST.

Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monu9226 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal images.

Дима Г (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is self-promotion-only user. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miss Curvy Africa Founder 2014-03-31 03-57.jpg

[edit]

"Miss Curvy Africa Founder" - could this be serious? It looks like a very clear out of scope personal image to me. Note: Interestingly INC has edited this file without proposing its deletion. Am I missing something here? E4024 (talk) 16:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unidentified people

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/unused images of non-notable people/groups of people

INeverCry 03:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment – File:Aarons-CustomerCore-1000StoreCelebration-7402 (10929000135).jpg is now in use at w:Hair#Curly hair – Wdchk (talk) 03:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment – Given that so many of these nominated images are now in use within Wikipedia articles, it appears that the nominator has simply nominated for deletion most, if not all, of the images within the Category "Unidentified people" without regard for their content or possible usefulness for educational purposes. More care needs to be taken before nominating files for deletion, and mass nominations such as this one should be discouraged. ̴̴̴̴

̽ <bɾ>

  • Oppose – Little or no attempt has been made by the nominator to determine if any of the listed files may have an educational purpose, and in fact most of these files do have educational value, and many of these files are now in use within Wikipedia articles. The nominator is attempting a mass-deletion of files based solely on the fact that each was listed in the category “unidentified people”, despite the fact that many of the above files are mis-categorized because the people in many of the files are identified. The indiscriminate culling of files based on nothing more than categorization (or mis-categorization as the case may be) is not acceptable. Dolovis (talk), 15 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Delete to the Aarons-CustomerCore images, they serve no educative process, and that Dolovis has gone and added that rubbish to articles to try and justify their usage/etention is somewhere between ridiculous, and a disappointing abuse. The others, really do we have to step through a non-thematic compilation of images and try to provide an opinion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:2tone SG Dallas Shoot.jpg for licensing/impersonation problems (either it is uploaders own work and they are impersonating the subject, or it is someone elses work and the subject hasn't provided evidence of authors permission).
 Delete the entire Aarons-CustomerCore-1000StoreCelebration collection because these are out of scope and have been added to articles with tenuous links - this sort of photo stream is more appropriate to the company website or You-Twit-Face,
 Keep File:Actstrange1.jpg because it does fit into the article it has been added to but needs a description,
 Delete all the ones from File:Adima Porträtfoto.jpg to File:By MuRaT11.jpg as unused and/or out-of-scope (including the ones added to articles in a rather weak attempt to provide EDUSE's),
 Delete File:Capo (Rapper).jpg because although it is in use at de-wiki, it is of questionable copyright status based on this Google search limited to similar images before 1 October 2012,
 Delete all the ones from File:Cardan.jpg to File:Djwars.JPG as unused and out-of-scope images. Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one kept, rest deleted as blatantly out of Commons' scope FASTILY 09:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unidentified people

[edit]

images of unknown persons - not in use - no educational value (no COM:EDUSE)

CoCoCounty97 (talk) 00:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified ladies lamenting Keopuolani's death.jpg is in use.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A historical image from the US National Archives of President Franklin Roosevelt's funeral is of "no educational value" because the people pictured are not identified? It seems pretty clear the files nominated here haven't been individually considered, and this seems kind of disruptive. Dominic (talk) 01:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hanxu 2.JPG is obviously identified.--維基小霸王 (talk) 01:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is an insane number of mutually unrelated images to take up in a single request. That said, on the four images of mine I see among those nominated:
Disruptive, as Dominic wrote above, appears to be an appropriate chracterisation of this mass deletion request. Concerning the three files made and uploaded by me (1, 2, 3): They are part of a concert gallery, Category:Manu Delago Handmade (Popfest 2014). I'd rather not believe, that images of musicians are not welcome here, because only the bandleader has an article (yet). --Tsui (talk) 01:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hotel Bristol dinner.jpg is clearly identified, and is in use on dewiki. I'd  Keep on principle since the nominator has failed to properly check to see whether the files that have been put in this category actually meet the criteria specified in the DR. Overeager deletionism of historically valid images in use on Wikimedia projects benefits nobody. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at a few of these, more or less at random:
I propose a speedy close and keep. If some of these merit deletion, let's see them nominated in some reasonable manner. - Jmabel ! talk 01:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with all above, speedy close and keep. Nom clearly hasn't done their homework. My 4 that are listed are historic and clear enough that historians would be able to identify whom they seek.
 Keep Clearly a sloppy, disruptive and verging on vandalism DR. The files uploade by me (as others) are clearly educational and in scope:

Images of movie premieres: File:Dreamgirls Premiere (366221052).jpg File:Miss Potter Premiere (313202507).jpg File:Miss Potter Premiere (313202986).jpg File:P1090527 (155443143).jpg File:Wolfgang Petersen - Poseidon Premiere 5.jpg

Closing ceremony of the 2015 Military World Games File:Cerimônia de Encerramento (22218092771).jpg

Informal meeting of the EU competitiveness and telecommunications ministers File:Informal meeting of competitiveness and telecommunications ministers. Arrival and welcome Delegate (35856017401).jpg File:Informal meeting of competitiveness and telecommunications ministers. Arrival and welcome Delegate (35988640145).jpg

Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation

File:Επίσκεψη ΥΦΥΠΕΞ Κ. Γεροντόπουλου στο Ερεβάν της Αρμενίας (11355064175).jpg

Brazilian Senate

File:Solenidades. Homenagens (21768451894).jpg

In a few words, all in scope and sloppyly nominated for deletion. Tm (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It seems that this vandal as nominated thousands of images, in this DR and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unidentified men. Speedy close all of them and was blocked as a possible sockpuppet of a former prolific user. True or not, this Drs are pure vandalism, so better not waste peoples time with this actions. Tm (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There are other things in many of those photographs than just people. I am fine with deletion of few useless images but such large DR seems like waste of time. --Jarekt (talk) 02:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep and re-nominate in smaller batches, preferably less than 25 at a time. Artix Kreiger (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. File:Nickfalcon.jpg is in uses in en:w:Nick Fallon (as can be seen on the image page); apparently shows notable person in scope, though uploader unfortunately neglected to put a proper text description on Commons. Seems a sloppy mass deletion request done without checking usefulness/use of individual images. I suggest closing the batch as kept as too much useful would be lost. Individual images or more thoughtfully/carefully selected sets of images may be resubmitted for deletion request; this batch is too large and diverse. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • [1] - a notable in scope person in a notable location; another person in the photo is not identified, so the nomination states "images of unknown persons - not in use - no educational value". This nomination is simply irresponsible and completely inappropriate. "Category:Unknown persons" is *NOT* an inherent reason to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEPT per Artix Kreiger and other comments above. Inappropriate and irresponsibly sloppy mass deletion request. (This is a decision on the mass deletion listing; individual images may be relisted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unidentified people

[edit]

COM:CSD F10 personal photos of non-notable people.

RZuo (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/mobile_tracking/archive/2018-14&oldid=295239495"