Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2017-15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Combination of private photos. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: : Number 10 is still there, on purpose or forgot one? Basvb (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Basvb: This gave me a backend error - failure to acquire lock. I usually give these about 15 to 30 minutes, and then the deletion succeeds. lNeverCry 23:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the quick ping then, I should've been a bit more patient. Basvb (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

duplicated and corrupted files.

NinjaStrikers «» 09:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook copyvios and out of scope/bad quality photos

/St1995 14:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, see metadata. Out of project scope‎.

~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of those photos are copied from facebook. Also low quality photos.

Aftabuzzaman (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of those photos are copied from facebook.

Aftabuzzaman (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1645315, original file: https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-C5mgCPmx6xo/UeGU0F2rVwI/AAAAAAAAfY4/yumOeQqosqg/s1024/1.jpg Kleiner (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File claimed to be own work, however the date is 1969. Seems a photo of a photo, thus a possible copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 20:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Actually, it is probably a mistake in the license. If the photo was taken in Italy in the '60, the CC by-sa license should be replaced by PD-Italy and PD-1996. I leave the pleasure to eventually replace the license to the closing admin ;) Ruthven (msg) 14:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete incomplete deletion request made by the uploader within an hour of uploading - likely changed their mind, so we should respect their request Ww2censor (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete incomplete deletion request made by the uploader within two hours of uploading - likely changed their mind, so we should respect their request. It may even be a copyvio because tineye finds several versions https://tineye.com/search/7e88ba8852277e479ae787480750664bdb5d6143/?sort=score&order=desc

Ww2censor (talk) 10:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali.rajaei71 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some map of Europe of poor quality. It's not clear what it depicts either from description or title. Unused. No COM:EDUSE. XXN, 22:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 14:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photograph, unused, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 21:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adérito skilleer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adérito skilleer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal pics, not within project scope

Daphne Lantier 22:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachspsach (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, possibly unfree screenshot of a running laptop.

Ras67 (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within project scope — unused personal photo Daphne Lantier 18:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value -- simple jpg with plain text Daphne Lantier 19:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]