Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2017-10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-used personal photo. out of scope Kkairri (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akmal Munir786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non used personal photo. out of scope Kkairri (talk) 15:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hayat zwina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal pic/drawings, not within project scope

Daphne Lantier 23:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 23:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC) According to me you can leave it, it's my photo, it can be used by somebody. I would not cancel it. --Elenaf (talk) 09:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© model cars, see Com:TOYS

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC

I report what cstevencampbell said here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Cstevencampbell "think it's about time to say that there are types of subjects that really are not appropriate for Wikipedia and are best treated elsewhere (books and other published outlets) where permissions are obtained or fair use is considered more broadly. Such a subject is perhaps all too specialized for Wikipedia anyway".
I personally think it's insane that wikipedia can't show images that a museum can (like this image taken from a museum site: File:Politoys - Alfa Romeo Guilia G.T.jpg) --Arosio Stefano (talk) 08:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. A mess made in heaven. No easy way out of it. :-( --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saved all the photo that you are deleting (and other photos already deleted by someone else) here: http://polistil.altervista.org/all-diecast-of-the-italian-company/ If wikimedia commons change his mind, we can recover the photos from this site.... :'-( --Arosio Stefano (talk) 09:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Some clever elucubration by cstevencampbell.... (where can we put so everibody can see them?)

1. They are utilitarian. Toy cars produced in miniature, as extensions of the real cars they copy, are essentially utilitarian. Though they do not function like real machines, they normally exist as playthings, usually for children, which is a utilitarian function, just perhaps not an adult one. They also usually serve a promotional function as children playing with, for example, Chevrolets, are then encouraged to grow up and buy Chevrolets, a promotion of the automobile industry. An inherent truth in the business of toy cars, as seen in the fact that in many cases the real manufacturers would make in-house toy models for play to be distributed or sold to children (Hudson, Citroen, Alfa Romeo). This is a traditional purpose for toys which has existed at least since about 1930.

2. Replication of the real thing. Most toy and model makers in replicating real cars are not seeking the uniqueness of artistic representation. In fact, quite the opposite is true. When Matchbox makes a Mercedes-Benz C-Class sedan, its goal is the same as when Corgi Toys makes a C-Class sedan – to make, within the craftsman’s skills, the most accurate representation possible. The goal is normally the most accurate portrayal possible of the real car in miniature, not a unique artistic expression. In other words, the fact that one maker chooses to paint on rear lights while another manufacturer chooses tinted plastic lenses is not an effort to produce an artistic rendering - it is an attempt to replicate the real car as closely as possible – so adults and children will buy the ‘car of their dreams’, etc. Local choices in manufacturing serve only to transmit the idea of utilitarian function to the smaller replicated object. The goal is to recreate the real car, not artistically diverge from it. Over time, as manufacturing processes have become more precise, model manufacturers replicate the real car with greater and greater accuracy, thus emphasizing the real, usable, actual purpose of the object. The concept, of course, does not apply to Hot Rods, Customs or other fantastical creations (for instance by Mattel Hot Wheels) which do not replicate any real vehicle. These would be covered by copyright law. Attempts to recreate the real vehicle would not.

3. Licensing backs the idea of utilitarian function. Until the late 1980s, toy producers could recreate any vehicle they liked without paying royalties. After this, GM, Chrysler, Ford and other manufacturers required royalties of the toy manufacturers. This process resulted in two things. Fewer manufacturers who could afford the licensing and more precision replication in the toy or model as firms had closer contacts with blueprints and plans. This enhances the theme of utilitarian function in models. Auto companies want to maximize profits and protect their creations. Model manufacturers strive to make the most accurate representations of models possible – as much as possible, to recreate utilitarian and promotional function of the vehicles in miniature, thus the idea that different toy makers strive for uniqueness or artistic representation in their product is, at best, an imprecise argument.

4. Commercial exploitation generally does not apply. After the above, one might say, “Well there is always the possibility that images of these toys and models may be sold or used without due remuneration to the owners” - and this is a possibility, I suppose. Many, many books, from well-known publishers, though, discuss models of many kinds, from many companies and many different countries without direct permission from manufacturers. Most photos in a Wikipedia environment are examples, and, in any event, show only portions of vehicle or a car from one angle. To steal a design to develop a real car, one needs more sophisticated plans or blueprints than can be obtained from a picture or two.

--Arosio Stefano (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see the recreation of a real car as a toy as you do. A toy car, based on a real one, is more utilitarian than a unique creation made using imagination. In my book that is. The community decided otherwise in many instances before. Nothing we can do until that changes. :( Thanks for the rescue! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: Cstevencampbell was responded to here and here; he was/is musing on what he wishes were so, not stating what actually is (i.e., this is not a refutation of models as copyrightable objects). Эlcobbola talk 23:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These models have no other functions than to be pictorial, and not an utilitarian function as for a real vehicule. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: : Number 10 is still there, on purpose or forgot one? Basvb (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Basvb: This gave me a backend error - failure to acquire lock. I usually give these about 15 to 30 minutes, and then the deletion succeeds. lNeverCry 23:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the quick ping then, I should've been a bit more patient. Basvb (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

duplicated and corrupted files.

NinjaStrikers «» 09:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook copyvios and out of scope/bad quality photos

/St1995 14:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, see metadata. Out of project scope‎.

~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of those photos are copied from facebook. Also low quality photos.

Aftabuzzaman (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Golam Hossen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of those photos are copied from facebook.

Aftabuzzaman (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.Juliancolton | Talk 21:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishal Mondal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images, out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You see the flash very much, better photos of Olympia Traveller now available on Commons Carl Ha (talk) 16:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: This may be the only image of this model with this keyboard. Flash is not too bad. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful DmitTrix (talk) 18:44, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Small unused photo without camera data, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikibaophuoc17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/_lbUmUFnlFj3SG-d3xogPmJ4LWI=/0x372:2481x2026/1310x873/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/50288393/GettyImages-584836182.0.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted, copyvios. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikibaophuoc17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted content.

XXN, 16:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted, copyvios. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, unclear copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhojasar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope - commons is not a photoalbum

Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, no context to give it educational value. P 1 9 9   15:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]